0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The Myths of the New World," Daniel G. Brinton offers a groundbreaking exploration of indigenous mythologies across the Americas, delving into their rich tapestry of narratives and symbols. Written in the late 19th century, Brinton's work employs a comprehensive comparative approach, presenting myths not merely as folklore but as essential cultural artifacts that reflect the spiritual and social underpinnings of Native American societies. The literary style is systematic and scholarly, yet imbued with a deep reverence for the material, revealing profound connections between language, culture, and human experience. Daniel G. Brinton, an esteemed American anthropologist and archaeologist, was remarkably attuned to the complexities of indigenous cultures, an awareness fostered by his extensive travels and interactions with Native communities. His academic background in medicine and philosophy uniquely equipped him to analyze myths through a multidimensional lens, seeking to bridge the gap between Euro-American understanding and indigenous perspectives. Brinton's advocacy for the preservation of Native American heritage and his critical perspectives on cultural assimilation underscore the motivations behind his meticulous documentation of myths. This seminal work is highly recommended for scholars, students, and anyone intrigued by the intersection of mythology, anthropology, and cultural studies. Brinton's insights not only illuminate the rich narrative traditions of the Americas but also encourage readers to appreciate the profound wisdom embedded within these myths, offering a more nuanced understanding of the human condition across cultures. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
The Myths of the New World
Table of Contents
Introduction
At the crossroads of story and inquiry, The Myths of the New World explores how the Indigenous peoples of the Americas fashioned coherent cosmologies through symbol, ritual, and narrative. Written by Daniel G. Brinton, an American ethnologist and linguist, this study offers a wide-ranging examination of meaning-making across diverse cultures from the hemisphere commonly called the New World. Brinton seeks patterns without erasing differences, approaching myth not as fanciful invention but as a disciplined expression of belief, memory, and environment. The result is a work that asks readers to take Indigenous intellectual traditions seriously and to consider how symbols convey knowledge across languages and landscapes.
First published in 1868, Brinton’s book belongs to nineteenth-century scholarship in comparative mythology and the emerging fields of anthropology and the history of religions. It is a work of non-fiction, scholarly synthesis, and analysis rather than a narrative history or collection of tales. Its scope spans North, Central, and South America, drawing on reports, vocabularies, and ritual descriptions available to a researcher of his era. While framed by the intellectual currents of its time, the study positions American mythologies as worthy of systematic treatment, aiming to identify organizing ideas that recur across regions without reducing distinctive traditions to a single template.
Readers encounter an analytical voice that balances breadth with close attention to symbolic detail. Brinton arranges materials thematically, moving from cosmological concepts to ritual structures, and from linguistic traces to interpretive frameworks. The prose reflects nineteenth-century scholarly style: careful, synthesizing, and committed to orderly argument. The experience is less that of folklore retold than of ideas unfolded—an effort to map how images, numbers, directions, deities, and ceremonial acts express a logic of the sacred. Throughout, he tests competing explanations, weighing naturalistic, psychological, and cultural readings of myth while assessing the reliability of sources inherited from travelers, missionaries, and early chroniclers.
Central concerns include creation and origin narratives, the ordering of space through the cardinal points, the cycles of sun, wind, and waters, and conceptions of life, death, and the soul. Brinton is attentive to how colors, numbers, and ritual gestures form coherent symbolic systems, and how heroic figures and culture bearers encode moral instruction and communal memory. He explores how the visible world—storms, seasons, celestial movements—becomes a language for invisible realities. Rather than presenting myths as isolated stories, the book treats them as interconnected expressions of worldview, asking what they reveal about knowledge, ethics, and the place of human communities within a living cosmos.
A persistent thread is methodological: how to interpret traditions recorded through colonial lenses without losing Indigenous categories of thought. Brinton evaluates inherited narratives with caution, distinguishing embellishment from consistent motifs and seeking convergences across independent testimonies. He draws on philology, symbolism, and cross-cultural comparison while acknowledging the constraints of his evidence base. The study reflects its period’s aspirations to scientific order, yet it also pushes against dismissive attitudes by granting American mythologies intellectual dignity. That duality—historically situated methods paired with a respectful aim—shapes the book’s tone and offers insight into the formation of comparative mythology as a scholarly enterprise.
For contemporary readers, the book matters both as an early systematic account and as a document of intellectual history that invites critical engagement. It illuminates how scholars first articulated patterns in American myth while also exhibiting assumptions and terminologies that today require careful contextualization. Reading it alongside current Indigenous scholarship and updated ethnographies encourages questions about voice, authority, and the ethics of representation. The work opens discussions about how symbols travel across languages, how ritual orders social life, and how cosmologies guide ecological and moral understanding—questions that remain resonant in debates about cultural continuity, decolonization, and the stewardship of knowledge.
Approached in this spirit, The Myths of the New World offers a reflective, idea-rich journey into the structures of sacred thought across the Americas. It rewards readers who appreciate rigorous synthesis and who are willing to examine how evidence, interpretation, and worldview interact in the study of religion and culture. As an early contribution to comparative mythology by Daniel G. Brinton, it stands at the intersection of curiosity and system, history and analysis. Its pages invite patient reading, measured skepticism, and an openness to symbolic language—an introduction not only to a body of myths, but to the very craft of understanding them.
Synopsis
Daniel G. Brinton’s The Myths of the New World surveys the religious ideas and myths of Indigenous peoples across the Americas. It sets out a comparative method, distinguishing myth from history, legend, and theology, and situates American traditions within a universal human tendency to explain nature through personified narratives. Brinton emphasizes collecting myths in native languages, warns against missionary distortions and sensational claims, and rejects theories attributing American myths to Old World importation. He contends that these traditions arose independently, shaped by environment, language, and social life. The opening frames myth as early philosophy and poetry, offering insight into thought processes rather than literal chronicles.
The book outlines how myths originate from the personification of natural phenomena and the metaphorical habits of early speech. It describes the transition from sensations—light, wind, storm, dawn—to imagined beings, and shows how figures gain attributes through linguistic play, poetic parallelism, and ritual practice. Brinton proposes that dreams, omens, and shamanic experiences further reinforce mythic forms. He presents a guiding interpretive principle: much American mythology centers on celestial and meteorological processes, agricultural cycles, and cardinal directions. Throughout, he stresses the need for critical comparison, chronological layering, and attention to local context to avoid conflating late syncretism with ancient beliefs.
Surveying broad patterns, Brinton describes a pantheon populated by powers of the sky, sun, fire, wind, thunder, and earth, often organized around the four quarters. He addresses the notion of a supreme being, arguing that while many groups recognized high deities or universal forces, this does not equate to developed monotheism. Instead, hierarchies of nature spirits and culture heroes prevailed. He notes widespread dualism and twin motifs, as well as myths relating to maize and sustenance. The discussion also treats priesthoods, shamans, and ritual specialists, who mediated between communities and invisible forces, and shaped ceremonial calendars, sacrifices, and public festivals.
Brinton details worship of the heavens as a central feature, with sun and fire cults prominent in Mesoamerica and the Andes. He describes institutional forms, such as temples, state rites, and calendrical observances, alongside household devotions. Thunder and wind receive distinct honors, with storm deities linked to fertility and peril. The four directions, often associated with colors, animals, and winds, structure ritual space and mythic geography. The narrative outlines how political centralization affected the ritual system, expanding priestly classes and state ceremonies. Through this, he emphasizes the continuity between cosmological concepts and social organization, showing how cycles of time, labor, and worship interlocked.
The text then treats culture heroes and civilizers—figures like Quetzalcoatl, Viracocha, Itzamna, and Bochica—who teach arts, laws, and agriculture, and whose stories encode cosmological themes. In the North, characters such as Manabozho (Michabo) exemplify transformative hero-tricksters. Brinton interprets these personages as largely derived from light, wind, or dawn phenomena, their ethical and cultural roles accruing over time. He notes recurring patterns of departure and promised return, creative acts followed by withdrawal, and twin cycles in Central America. By comparing names, attributes, and myth episodes, he argues that hero myths consolidate environmental observations and social aspirations into enduring narrative frameworks.
Cosmogonic narratives outline the making of earth and sky, the origins of sun and moon, and the emergence of humans. Brinton catalogs creation themes such as the earth-diver, world mountain or tree, and emergence from caves, lakes, or womb-like spaces. Deluge traditions are widespread, often linked to storm imagery, seasonal renewal, or moral calamity. He views the flood complex as a recurring symbolic response to environmental rhythms rather than a single historical memory. The section tracks regional variations, noting how culture heroes sometimes rescue survivors, set new ordinances, or reorder the world, creating a new epoch marked by calendrical rites and agricultural beginnings.
Brinton next addresses the soul and the afterlife, discussing terms derived from breath, shadow, or vitality, and the possibility of multiple soul aspects. He describes journeys to the underworld or the sun’s abode, environments of trial or repose, and distinctions made for warriors, nobles, or those dying specific deaths. Moral elements appear variably across traditions, with some afterworlds structured by ethical conduct and others by cosmological status. Funerary customs—offerings, cremation, burial goods, and mourning rites—reflect beliefs about continued agency and reciprocity. He notes guardian and psychopomp figures, and the role of dreams, trance, and divination in negotiating posthumous destinies.
Symbols and rites receive systematic treatment. Brinton examines the cross, tree, serpent, maize mother, and color-number schemes as expressions of cardinal order, fertility, or celestial paths. He discusses bloodletting, sacrifice, medicine bundles, and ordeal as means of renewing power and mediating with deities. Calendars, astronomical observations, and numeration support divination, festival timing, and state administration. A philological approach interprets divine names and ritual terms, tracing how polysynthetic languages foster metaphor and mythic growth. The analysis links speech patterns to myth structure, arguing that figures and episodes arise through persistent poetic analogy, ritual reinforcement, and social memory rather than borrowed theological systems.
Concluding, Brinton asserts the independent development and coherence of American mythologies and their value for comparative studies. He emphasizes the mental unity of humankind while acknowledging regional diversity and historical layering. Myths are presented as early science and art, organizing observations of nature into intelligible forms that guide conduct and ritual. He calls for rigorous, language-based collection and careful separation of original narratives from later syncretism. The overall message is that New World myths constitute a structured, explanatory corpus, revealing consistent patterns of thought that parallel, but do not derive from, Old World traditions, and that illuminate the evolution of religious ideas.
Historical Context
Daniel G. Brinton’s The Myths of the New World appeared in 1868, with a revised edition in 1876, from the vantage of a postbellum United States scholarly community centered in Philadelphia. Although not a narrative, its setting is hemispheric: from the Arctic to the Andes, and temporally from precontact eras to the colonial centuries when myths were recorded. The time of writing was marked by rapid expansion of museums, learned societies, and a belief in comparative science. Brinton assembled missionary chronicles, indigenous texts, and travel reports to map religious systems across the Americas, writing amid Reconstruction politics and a brisk transatlantic exchange of ethnological ideas.
Foremost in shaping his materials were the conquests that opened archives of belief to outside recorders. In Mexico, Hernán Cortés and allied forces overthrew Tenochtitlan on 13 August 1521; in the Andes, Francisco Pizarro seized Atahualpa at Cajamarca in 1532 and reached Cuzco in 1533. Franciscan and Dominican missionaries then compiled Nahua, Maya, and Quechua accounts. Bernardino de Sahagún’s work at Tlatelolco and in the Florentine Codex (c. 1540s–1585) preserved cosmologies and rites. In Yucatán, Diego de Landa’s Relación de las cosas de Yucatán (1566) followed his 1562 auto da fé at Maní, which destroyed codices while paradoxically recording alphabets and rituals. In highland Guatemala, the K’iche’ Popol Vuh was transcribed by Francisco Ximénez circa 1701–1703 at Chichicastenango. Brinton mined these textual strata to reconstruct mythic systems and to contrast precontact structures with colonial transformations.
Precontact religious landscapes provide the comparative backbone of the study. The Mexica alliance, formed in 1428 and centered at Tenochtitlan, venerated Huitzilopochtli and Quetzalcoatl under a 260-day tonalpohualli and a 365-day xiuhpohualli. Classic and Postclassic Maya centers such as Palenque, Copán, and Uxmal inscribed the deeds of deities like Itzamna and Kukulkan and elaborated multilayered underworlds. In Tawantinsuyu, the Inca organized Cusco’s ceque system around shrines to Inti and Viracocha, as chronicled later by Bernabé Cobo in 1653. North of Mesoamerica, Iroquois, Algonquian, and Pueblo narratives traced origins through figures like Sky Woman and Spider Grandmother. Brinton juxtaposed these systems to argue for shared logics across regions.
Nineteenth-century antiquarianism supplied the visual and philological evidence that made large-scale comparison feasible. John Lloyd Stephens and Frederick Catherwood’s expeditions of 1839–1841 yielded Incidents of Travel volumes in 1841 and 1843, with precise drawings of Copán, Uxmal, and Palenque that fixed Maya iconography for scholars. Lord Kingsborough’s nine-volume Antiquities of Mexico (London, 1831–1848) reproduced codices such as the Borgia and Laud. In Paris, Charles Étienne Brasseur de Bourbourg issued Landa’s Relación in 1864 and a French Popol Vuh in 1861, while Henry R. Schoolcraft’s six volumes on the Indian tribes of the United States (1851–1857) gathered northern myths. The Smithsonian Institution, founded in 1846, disseminated reports and collections. Brinton’s book synthesizes this dispersed archive into a hemispheric argument about symbolism.
Debates over human difference and religious evolution in the 1830s–1870s formed an unavoidable backdrop. Samuel George Morton’s Crania Americana (Philadelphia, 1839) and Josiah Nott and George Gliddon’s Types of Mankind (1854) advanced polygenist hierarchies. Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859) recast the language of development, and Edward B. Tylor’s Primitive Culture (1871) framed animism as an early, universal stage. Brinton positions American myths within a developmental schema yet emphasizes psychological unity and comparable reasoning across peoples. By privileging linguistic, calendrical, and ritual structures over cranial metrics, he redirected attention from biological ranking to cultural analysis.
United States expansion and Indian policy also conditioned the archive. The Indian Removal Act of 28 May 1830 precipitated the Cherokee Trail of Tears in 1838–1839 toward Indian Territory. The Indian Appropriations Act of 1851 formalized the reservation system; the Sand Creek Massacre on 29 November 1864 in Colorado Territory exposed the violence accompanying it; and the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty was followed by Congress’s 1871 end to treaty-making. Missionaries and officials, amid dispossession, compiled vocabularies, hymnals, and tales among Plains, Great Lakes, and Southwest peoples. Brinton’s synthesis treats these materials as coherent cosmologies to be studied on their own terms rather than curiosities of vanishing tribes.
The American Civil War (1861–1865) and Reconstruction were formative for Brinton’s generation. Trained as a physician, he served as a Union Army surgeon before returning to Philadelphia’s networks of the American Philosophical Society and the American Ethnological Society, where empirical standards and cataloging practices took hold. The Smithsonian’s publications program expanded, and surveys in the West gathered artifacts and myths. The 1876 Centennial International Exhibition in Philadelphia displayed archaeological casts and ethnographic collections to mass audiences. Brinton released his revised edition that year, aligning the work with a professionalizing Americanist scholarship and a museum culture that sought systematic classification across Algonquian, Iroquoian, Nahua, Mayan, and Andean corpora.
As social and political critique, the book insists that American indigenous religions are rational, structured systems with cosmologies, ethics, and metaphysics equal in complexity to Old World traditions. By foregrounding calendars, creation narratives, and ritual symbolism, it undermines the colonial trope of savage superstition that long justified conquest, removal, and forced conversion. It implicitly rebukes policies of cultural erasure by demonstrating intellectual achievement in Lenape, Nahua, Maya, and Quechua sources. At the same time, its evolutionist scaffolding reveals the period’s scientistic urge to rank cultures, exposing both the possibilities and the limits of nineteenth-century reformist scholarship.
