Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
- Herausgeber: tredition
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
- Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2024
A book for men and women from middle age to advanced years who have suddenly and unexpectedly become confronted with the huge effects that the male prostate can have on the body. It is a tale of what can happen to both men and women when the prostate transforms over time as the body changes, free of any of the minor or major taboos surrounding those involved. The book presents both a subjective and an objective account, from a female and a male perspective, of what the prostate is and of the physical, psychological and social effects that changes to the prostate can bring as one ages or reaches old age. The latest medical, psychotherapeutic and social measures available to help men with prostate issues and their partners are discussed. It also addresses the therapeutic taboos that have previously prevented us from attempting a systemic approach to the physical, psychological and social transformation that men and women undergo when they reach middle age and beyond.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 203
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Ähnliche
When right is wrong and wrong is right
About the author
N. N. studied Human Medicine and Systemic Management before obtaining a doctorate on the subject of corticosteroids. Over the course of their clinical activities N. N. developed an interest in the systemic links between the organism, the psyche and the social system and the associated recursive, paradoxically organised control loops.
The subject addressed in this book is one that is fitting of a Greek tragedy, where ‘right is wrong and wrong is right’.
On the circular stages of Ancient Greece, tragedies unfolded whilst the actors’ faces remained hidden behind masks through which the voices of the ‘personae’ were filtered. In that sense there are parallels with this book; the individual behind it remains hidden, and only their voice is heard.
Many thanks to all those who assisted during rehearsals – which took place without masks – and posed questions that helped to refine the ideas behind this book and ultimately the text within it.
Publisher
tredition GmbH
Heinz-Beusen-Stieg 5
22926 Ahrensburg
ISBN 978-3-384-15763-8
The Prostate Gland
A Story
Why was this story written?
I believe that to read this book you need be nothing more than – quite simply – a man.
This particular man’s plea is for something that has been – at least theoretically – possible for every woman above the age of 40 since the research conducted by Dr Johannes Huber, a university professor and gynaecological endocrinologist from Vienna, Austria and German gynaecologist Dr Volker Rimkus. More specifically, he believes that men over the age of 40 should also be able to have their blood tested for adrenal and gonadal insufficiency and to receive bioidentical hormone replacement therapy in order to return their hormone levels to those of a healthy young adult.
But not only that: he is also calling for adrenal and gonadal deficiency to be taken just as seriously as pancreatic (insulin) insufficiency and thyroid (thyroxine) insufficiency, and for normal reference values to be based on levels typical of a young adult as advocated by Volker Rimkus, instead of normalising individual age-related deficiencies and letting fate take its course.
The information provided in this book is essential to understanding all of this; information that will be the subject of many a controversial and emotional discussion.
This book is not about broken hearts above the belt, for which surgical and intensive medical treatment is already available. It discusses highly emotional subjects below the belt that are capable of breaking more hearts than it is commonly believed.
Manneken Pis, Brussels
‘The only option left is to perform surgery to remove the diseased organs or parts thereof, replace the organs via transplant or use prosthetics.
Anyone with a family member who has undergone one of these emergency procedures would be prepared to do whatever it takes to seek an alternative remedy.’
Jürgen Schole and Wolfgang Lutz (1987)
Regulationskrankheiten
The Prostate Gland
Cover
Title Page
Prologue
Prologue
6. Appendix
The Prostate Gland
Cover
3
4
5
6
7
9
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
245
247
249
251
253
254
255
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
269
271
272
273
274
Prologue
When I began my first semester at the Faculty of Human Medicine, I was taught about the history of the university faculties. ‘Faculty’, I was told, comes from the Latin word ‘facultas’ – meaning ‘ability’ – as this is something one can acquire at university. For example, in the Faculty of Life Sciences one could acquire the ability to study nature and become a life scientist; in the Faculty of Law one could study the legal system and acquire the ability to become a legal scholar; and in the Faculty of Humanities one could study the thoughts and knowledge of humankind and become a philosopher.
A doctor, I was told, must understand a little of each: of the nature of man, of man’s thoughts and social system, which is in turn founded upon the legal system. Thus, the Faculty of Medicine was instated as the fourth faculty with the objective of training doctors, of bestowing upon them the ability to examine humans, to understand their nature, their thoughts and their social system, and to provide treatment to help them get better.
Another objective was said to be to teach future doctors to recognise their own humanity; to examine their own medical interventions, their own thoughts, their own social system and to adhere to the Ancient Greek maxim ‘know thyself’, such as it was advocated in the cradle of Western culture.
Now, 50 years later, I have discovered that this triadic concept of human knowledge has been reformulated by systems theorist and medical doctor Professor Fritz B. Simon in his work Formen (‘Forms’).
In Formen, the human abilities acquired at university – namely the ability to understand human nature, the ability to understand how humans think and the ability to understand law-based social systems – are described as an ability to understand phenomenologically distinct, auto-poietic human cognition systems; as an ability to acquire knowledge of/from the organism, of/from the consciousness and of/from the social system.
These three phenomenologically distinct human cognition systems – organism, consciousness and social system – are described as being linked, just as I was taught in my first semester studying human medicine.
One could thus posit that any knowledge acquired of/from human beings or of/from medicine is both facilitated and confined by the cognitive possibilities and limitations of our organism, our consciousness and the social system in which we live, our culture.
Over the 50 years that have passed since my first semester studying medicine, the field has changed paths. Its new path has led it away from the concept of ‘universitas’, away from an all-encompassing triadic, auto-poietic understanding of humankind, and towards a ‘pure’, allegedly objective science of the nature of man.
Though it has not done so explicitly, the field of medicine has nonetheless implicitly returned to the philosophy of René Descartes (1596–1650), to res cogitans and res extensa, to our everyday experience as thinking subjects, res cogitans, surrounded by objects, res extensa, that appear to exist independently of us.
In order to eliminate all traces of subjectivity from the objective study of humankind, the thinking subject – res cogitans, the individual human – has been replaced by physical measurement systems that provide reproducible results, data in the form of images or numbers, analytics generated by artificial intelligence. Individual observations have been labelled ‘subjective’ and cast aside, replaced by quantifiable, standardisable data – by statistics. Intersubjectivity has become devoid of value in objective terms.
Despite (or perhaps because of) all the progress achieved and the arrival of modern technology, today we are no closer to solving the questions and problems to which the field of medicine has devoted itself. This should give us pause for thought. To quote British mathematician and logician George Spencer-Brown: ‘If a method leads to serious complications, as this one does, history teaches us that it is inappropriate.’
Thus, my aim with this book is to apply – from a subjective, first person perspective – a comprehensive, universal, systemic approach to the characteristics/diseases of an organ (namely the prostate gland), the medical diagnosis and treatment of which is associated with major physical, psychological and social collateral damage.
This may pave the way for treatment approaches which, instead of resulting in physical, social and psychological mutilation, offer a chance for healing.
→ George Spencer-Brown, Laws of Form, Preface to the 1979 Edition
1. The Theory
1.01 Medicine
Sometimes it is worth taking the time to elucidate the etymolog- ical roots of a term. ‘Med’, so I have read, is Indo-Germanic and means ‘to measure’, ‘to ensure compliance’, ‘to care’. And the word ‘heal’ is related to ‘whole’.
Wikipedia describes medicine as an empirical science. Medicine, then, is pure empiricism. That is what I learned at the start of my clinical semester studying human medicine. This statement is based on the assumption that things can always turn out differently to what we know from our experience. And that was indeed the case at patients’ bedsides. There was also talk of ‘tried-and-tested techniques’; techniques that had proven their efficacy. At an early stage in our systems theory studies we were also introduced, without any further justification needed, to the maxim ‘ut aliquid fieri’ – the idea of simply doing something with the expectation that this will eventually bear fruit.
Now, 50 years on, the field of medicine has become double-blind. Subjective experience is no longer relevant. Instead, it is a question of providing double-blind, statistically sound evidence in service of a desire, an ability – perhaps even an obligation when one looks at the latest medical guidelines – to heal causes rather than symptoms. Though it should be noted that here, ‘heal’ is used in the sense of preserving life, of preventing death.
In medicine, measurements are used for a specific purpose, namely to heal, to prevent death. And healing, we are told, is a result of medical intervention.
It appears that whether or not a person has heard of the warning ‘medicus curat natura sanat’ – the physician cures while nature heals – issued by the physician Paracelsus (1493–1541) is nothing but an indication of whether or not they are trained in classics. The awareness of its relevance in our daily activities has been lost.
Although clinical measurement and observation is the first step in any medical intervention – in the words of Dr Franz Volhard, ‘the gods placed diagnosis before therapy’ – one must nonetheless ask the question: ‘what is the doctor looking at?’ or preferably ‘what else could they look at?’.
Paracelsus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim (1493–1541)
1.02 Object
The quote from the German text Regulationskrankheiten from the year 1987, with which I have prefaced these musings on the prostate gland, is still an accurate description of how the field of medicine deals with organs classified as diseased in order to help – even 36 years later. This is also true of the organ that we will be discussing: the prostate gland. Objective observation, objective examination, objective assessment – these are the premises of today’s scientifically defined medicine.
As in all the life sciences, observations must be objective and consensually verifiable or falsifiable. In medicine, this process of objective observation is referred to as diagnosis.
The diagnosing physician turns their focus to an object as they would to an item, a thing, ‘that prohibits their own action, that they are confronted with, that offers resistance to their own movement’. This resistance may take the form of a mass, a feeling, a functional disorder, a thing that demands their attention.
An object, an item, a thing; a metaphorical cube, a black box that is distinct from its environment. This object has boundaries, is ascribed a name and a value.
To once again cite British mathematician and logician George Spencer-Brown, a distinction is made, an object appears and is given a name or an ‘indication’, and a value inevitably emerges.
→ Fritz B. Simon (2021) Systemtheorie reloaded. Online Seminar Series
4D Hypercube – Tesseract
1.03 Organ
Similarly to objects, organs are regarded as distinct from their environment, their boundaries are defined and they are given a name. Just like any object that is delineated and named, the organ is ascribed a certain value. This value reflects the significance of that organ to humans, to the phenomenologically distinct realms of being: a person’s organism, their psyche, their social system.
As an anatomical and functional component of the organism, the organ is cognitively coupled with the organism. One could argue that the organ is under permanent cognitive observation by the organism, which is in turn observed by the consciousness, which is in turn coupled with the social system. This is an example of the ‘expansion of the boundaries of the field of observation and investigation’ as described and advocated in systems theory.
When an organ performs its function as a component of the organism, and the organism and organ work in perfect harmony as is biologically expected, this state of being of the organ and organism is not coupled with the consciousness; it resides unconsciously in the cognitive realm of the organism.
It is only when a state of non-alignment occurs, when an expected functional biological behaviour is not performed, that this dysfunctionality reaches the realm of the consciousness and from there the social system in the form of communication.
In other words, when an organ is not aligned with the expectations of the organism, with the expectations of the consciousness and/or the social system that are coupled therewith, the organ is observed, named and ascribed a value.
The organism expects the organ to perform its function. The consciousness expects the organ to behave discreetly, appropriately. The social system expects the organ to refrain from disrupting the social order. If the organ meets these expectations, it is granted the title of ‘healthy’.
→ Fritz B. Simon (2021) Systemtheorie reloaded. Online Seminar Series
1.04 The Norm
Organs that are not disruptive are regarded by the organism, by the consciousness and by the social system as normal – as healthy. The term ‘healthy’ is a layman’s term for which there is no more precise definition. This term is not used in scientific medicine, as there is no scientific criterion for measuring ‘healthiness’.
The term ‘ill’ is also a layman’s term. There is no scientific criterion for measuring ‘illness’ either. The term ‘ill’ is used within the social system to express the idea that a human within that system is not functioning as expected, for example because they cannot go to work. If a physician is of the opinion that such a person is able to return to work, they issue them with a doctor’s note that provides social acknowledgement of their ‘healthiness’.
Healthy and ill are not terms used in scientific, objective medicine. Instead, evidence is collected and diagnoses are made. Objective, physical measurements are taken. Data is gathered.
If, as systems theorist and physician Professor Fritz B. Simon notes, numerous different states of being fall under the definition of ‘survival’, this begs the question: which people in which state can provide data that defines the norm, the normal state, and can be used as a benchmark for objectively distinguishing between ill health and good health?
We are not talking about the subjective question of which measured values a person needs to demonstrate in order to feel fit and healthy, but the question of which values represent the norm, the state in which a person can objectively live their life or survive.
→ Seminar: Systemtheorie Reloaded with systems theorist and physician Fritz B. Simon
Normal Distribution Curve Gauß’sche Glockenkurve
In order to define this norm, tests are carried out on a statistically defined number of apparently healthy individuals. These individuals are divided into cohorts: newborns, infants, children, adults. For some of the tests, the adults are divided up by age and gender. A normal distribution curve is drawn over all the data collected, and the central 95% is defined as the norm.
1.05 Exceptions
Over the past four decades, only a small number of the normal ranges statistically defined by objective scientific medicine have been deviated from
when it became apparent that some of the values that fell within the normal distribution were actually correlated with changes in the organism that are classified as diseases.
This was the case for blood glucose. In some, usually elderly individuals, the hormone insulin is not produced by the pancreas in quantities appropriate to their diet and exercise regime. Their blood glucose level increases and this results in changes to their organs.
It was therefore decided, based on medical experience, to stop using the normal distribution values and to instead set the benchmark at a level typical of a young adult.
A similar process was applied to cholesterol, which is prone to increasing after the age of 35. In this case, a correlation with cardiovascular disease was postulated, though there is still no scientific evidence to back up this claim. No account was taken of the age-associated reduction in cholesterol usage in hormone metabolism, the increased proportion of unsaturated fats in oils declared as ‘healthy’ in recent decades, or the work done by Austrian biochemist and specialist in human metabolism and ageing processes Hermann Esterbauer (1936–1997).
It is noteworthy that these values are determined by the organism’s regulatory molecules – hormones – the levels of which can vary due to a range of factors, including in particular chromosomal gender, gene polymorphisms, age, nutritional status, social situation and psyche.
→ Hans-W. Diel and Jila Maki (2022) Lipoprotein(a)
Chemical Structure of Cholesterol Parent Substance for the Steroid Hormones
1.06 Statistics
Statistics provide us with values for the participating population in the form of a probability distribution. Those whose vital parameters – as measured in a medically objective manner – fall within this normal distribution are considered normal, and thus not in need of medical treatment. The statistics are generated by performing tests on people who are deemed to be suitable for this purpose.
For example, the original reference values for vitamin D – a lightdependent hormone – were determined based on tests performed on students in Boston, a city located at 42 degrees latitude. The values were low, which is unsurprising given the typical lifestyle of students, who spend much of their time indoors, and Boston’s location in the Northern hemisphere. Clarity was only achieved when tests were performed on lifeguards along America’s sunny coastlines, which caused quite a stir. It is the American doctor and biochemist Michael F. Holick (*1946) who we have to thank for these findings.
The situation is similar for the hormone insulin, the levels of which vary depending on diet and exercise.
The statistical values for the adrenal and gonadal steroids – the hormones produced in the adrenal cortex, testicles and ovaries – remain the subject of much discussion to this day. The normal range is very broad, as demonstrated by the standard values for the hormone testosterone in men and by the individual variation in women’s hormone levels, which start to drop off at the age of 30. Depending on the situation, this drop in hormone levels is declared to be a physiological consequence of ageing, an individual age-specific norm.
