125,99 €
This book provides a comprehensive overview of the latest research and standardization progress towards the 5th generation (5G) of mobile communications technology and beyond. It covers a wide range of topics from 5G use cases and their requirements, to spectrum, 5G end-to-end (E2E) system architecture including core network (CN), transport network (TN) and radio access network (RAN) architecture, network slicing, security and network management. It further dives into the detailed functional design and the evaluation of different 5G concepts, and provides details on planned trials and pre-commercial deployments across the globe. While the book naturally captures the latest agreements in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) New Radio (NR) Release 15, it goes significantly beyond this by describing the likely developments towards the final 5G system that will ultimately utilize a wide range of spectrum bands, address all envisioned 5G use cases, and meet or exceed the International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT) requirements for the year 2020 and beyond (IMT-2020).
5G System Design: Architectural and Functional Considerations and Long Term Research is based on the knowledge and consensus from 158 leading researchers and standardization experts from 54 companies or institutes around the globe, representing key mobile network operators, network vendors, academic institutions and regional bodies for 5G. Different from earlier books on 5G, it does not focus on single 5G technology components, but describes the full 5G system design from E2E architecture to detailed functional design, including details on 5G performance, implementation and roll-out.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1207
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2018
Cover
Title Page
Contributor List
Foreword 1
Foreword 2
Acknowledgments
List of Abbreviations
Part 1: Introduction and Basics
1 Introduction and Motivation
1.1 5
th
Generation Mobile and Wireless Communications
1.2 Timing of this Book and Global 5G Developments
1.3 Scope of the 5G System Described in this Book
1.4 Approach and Structure of this Book
References
2 Use Cases, Scenarios, and their Impact on the Mobile Network Ecosystem
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Main Service Types Considered for 5G
2.3 5G Service Requirements
2.4 Use Cases Considered in NGMN and 5G PPP Projects
2.5 Typical Use Cases Considered in this Book
2.6 Envisioned Mobile Network Ecosystem Evolution
2.7 Summary and Outlook
References
3 Spectrum Usage and Management
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Spectrum Authorization
and Usage Scenarios
3.3 Spectrum Bandwidth Demand Determination
3.4 Frequency Bands for 5G
3.5 Spectrum Usage Aspects at High Frequencies
3.6 Spectrum
Management
3.7 Summary and Outlook
References
4 Channel Modeling
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Core Features of New Channel Models
4.3 Additional Features of New Channel Models
4.4 Summary and Outlook
References
Part 2: 5G System Architecture and E2E Enablers
5 E2E Architecture
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Enablers and Design Principles
5.3 E2E Architecture Overview
5.4 Novel Concepts and Architectural Extensions
5.5 Internetworking, Migration and Network Evolution
5.6 Summary and Outlook
References
6 RAN Architecture
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Related Work
6.3 RAN Architecture Requirements
6.4 Protocol Stack Architecture and Network Functions
6.5 Multi‐Connectivity
6.6 RAN Function Splits
and Resulting Logical Network Entities
6.7 Deployment Scenarios and Related Physical RAN Architectures
6.8 RAN Programmability and Control
6.9 Summary and Outlook
References
7 Transport Network Architecture
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Architecture Definition
7.3 Technology Options and Protocols
7.4 Self‐Backhauling
7.5 Technology Integration and Interfacing
7.6 Transport Network Optimization and Performance Evaluation
7.7 Summary
References
8 Network Slicing
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Slice Realization in the Different Network Domains
8.3 Operational Aspects
8.4 Summary and Outlook
References
9 Security
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Threat Landscape
9.3 5G Security Requirements
9.4 5G Security Architecture
9.5 Summary
References
10 Network Management and Orchestration
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Network Management and Orchestration Through SDN and NFV
10.3 Enablers of Management and Orchestration
10.4 Orchestration
in Multi‐Domain and Multi‐Technology Scenarios
10.5 Software‐Defined Networking
for 5G
10.6 Network Function Virtualization
in 5G Environments
10.7 Autonomic Network Management
in 5G
10.8 Summary
References
Part 3: 5G Functional Design
11 Antenna, PHY and MAC Design
11.1 Introduction
11.2 PHY and MAC Design Criteria and Harmonization
11.3 Waveform Design
11.4 Coding
Approaches and HARQ
11.5 Antenna Design, Analog, Digital and Hybrid Beamforming
11.6 PHY/MAC Design for Multi‐Service Support
11.7 Summary and Outlook
References
12 Traffic Steering and Resource Management
12.1 Motivation and Role of Resource Management in 5G
12.2 Service Classification
: A First Step Towards Efficient RM
12.3 Dynamic Multi‐Service Scheduling
12.4 Fast‐Timescale Dynamic Traffic Steering
12.5 Network‐based Interference Management
12.6 Multi‐Slice RM
12.7 Energy‐efficient
RAN Moderation
12.8 UE Context
Management
12.9 Summary and Outlook
References
13 Initial Access, RRC and Mobility
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Initial Access
13.3 States and State Handling
13.4 Mobility
13.5 Summary and Outlook
References
14 D2D and V2X Communications
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Technical Status and Standardization Overview
14.3 5G Air Interface Candidate Waveforms for Sidelink Support
14.4 Device Discovery
on the Sidelink
14.5 Sidelink Mobility Management
14.6 V2X Communications for Road Safety Applications
14.7 Industrial Implementation of V2X in the Automotive Domain
14.8 Further Evolution of D2D Communications
14.9 Summary and Outlook
References
Part 4: Performance Evaluation and Implementation
15 Performance, Energy Efficiency and Techno‐Economic Assessment
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Performance Evaluation
Framework
15.3 Network Energy Efficiency
15.4 Techno‐Economic Evaluation and Analysis of 5G Deployment
15.5 Summary
References
16 Implementation of Hardware and Software Platforms
16.1 Introduction
16.2 Solutions for Radio Frontend Implementation
16.3 Solutions for Digital HW Implementation
16.4 Flexible HW/SW Partitioning
Solutions for 5G
16.5 Implementation of SW Platforms
16.6 Implementation Example: vRAN/C‐RAN Architecture in OAI
16.7 Summary
References
17 Standardization, Trials, and Early Commercialization
17.1 Introduction
17.2 Standardization Roadmap
17.3 Early Deployments
17.4 Summary
References
Index
End User License Agreement
Chapter 02
Table 2‐1. NGMN use case analysis by their characteristics and the dominant 5G service type, with H = high, L = low, and M = medium denoting the stringency of requirements.
Table 2‐2. 5G PPP Phase 1 use case families.
Table 2‐3. Vertical industry business cases.
Table 2‐4. Relationship between the NGMN use case families, 5G PPP use case families and the three main 5G service types.
Chapter 03
Table 3‐1. Estimated spectrum requirements for pre‐5G technologies in the year 2020 [8].
Table 3‐2. Bands identified for IMT and under study in ITU‐R [1].
Table 3‐3. Aggregate adjacent channel interference at the fixed service receiver [22].
Chapter 04
Table 4‐1. Parameters of path loss models for different outdoor scenarios.
Table 4‐2. Parameters of path loss models for different indoor scenarios.
Chapter 06
Table 6‐1. Latency
contributions of protocol stack layers in LTE [19].
Table 6‐2. RAN‐specific API calls [42].
Chapter 08
Table 8‐1. Key points and main open issues related to the support of network slicing.
Chapter 10
Table 10‐1. Components of the ETSI NFV framework.
Table 10‐2. Functional split of 5GEx interfaces and candidate solutions [21].
Chapter 12
Table 12‐1. Accuracy score for each classification mechanism.
Table 12‐2. Interference‐based TDD configuration classification.
Chapter 13
Table 13‐1. Implications of the main 5G services and their requirements on the 5G control plane functions.
Table 13‐2. Initial access options nomenclature. O: analog omni‐directional, D: analog directional, Dig: digital directional.
Table 13‐3. RRC states in 5G.
Table 13‐4. Number of high rise APs.
Chapter 14
Table 14‐1. The effect of DCC methods on certain key performance indicators. The arrows indicate that the magnitudes increase (↑) or decrease (↓) when the methods are active.
Table 14‐2. System performance w.r.t. system capacity (parameter:
).
Chapter 15
Table 15‐1. Summary of simulation performance evaluation results from METIS‐II [12].
Table 15‐2. Parameters for eMBB and mMTC traffic profiles.
Table 15‐3. ARPU estimates in EUR for EU 28 countries for 2020‐2025 period.
Chapter 16
Table 16‐1. Parameters for the numerical complexity analysis.
Table 16‐2. Mean time for FH link read/write and compression/decompression.
Table 16‐3. HW load of RRU/DU.
Table 16‐4. Parameters for the different C‐RAN deployments.
Chapter 17
Table 17‐1. Overview of 5G field trials in Japan in 2017.
Table 17‐2. Summarized list of trials by SK Telecom.
Chapter 01
Figure 1‐1. Main drivers behind past cellular communications generations and 5G.
Figure 1‐2. Combined overall 5G timeline of the mentioned different bodies.
Figure 1‐3. Illustration of the scope of the 5G system design covered in this book, in the form of few selected examples of the many topics covered in the book.
Chapter 02
Figure 2‐1. Key capabilities of IMT beyond 2020 [2]. a) Expected enhancements of IMT‐2020 vs. IMT‐Advanced.
b) Importance of KPIs for different service types.
Figure 2‐2. UC families considered by NGMN with representative UCs [6].
Figure 2‐3. Current value chain of the mobile telecommunications industry.
Figure 2‐4. Current value net of MNOs [14].
Figure 2‐5. Evolution of the value net of MNOs with 5G [14].
Chapter 03
Figure 3‐1. Concept for spectrum management and spectrum sharing [6].
Figure 3‐2. Voronoi cells in a 37 cell scenario, with 0.5 km inter‐site distance (ISD) and 20% error in phase and distance.
Figure 3‐3. Required system gain for different deployment scenarios in relation to frequency ranges [22].
Figure 3‐4. Impact of beamforming on coexistence under license‐exempt operation [6].
Figure 3‐5. Functional architecture of a holistic spectrum management system.
Chapter 04
Figure 4‐1. Evolution of the SCM/WINNER II channel model family.
Figure 4‐2. LOS probability in a shopping mall at different frequencies [12].
Figure 4‐3. (Left) Calculated penetration loss at 2 GHz for transverse‐magnetic (TM) polarization with incident angles of 0
°
(solid) and 45
°
(dashed); (Right) Calculated penetration loss for TM polarization for concrete of 15 cm width, and glass slabs with incident angle of 0
°
.
Figure 4‐4. Schematic of knife edge diffraction blockage model [16].
Figure 4‐5. RMS delay spread versus frequency in UMi‐Street Canyon (Left) and Indoor Office (right) in the 3GPP NR channel model [3] (0.5‐100 GHz) and the mmMAGIC channel model [5] (2‐96 GHz for outdoor and 2‐60 GHz for indoor).
Figure 4‐6. Comparison between UMi LOS path loss with and without ground reflection modeling.
Chapter 05
Figure 5‐1. An example of a network‐sliced architecture.
Figure 5‐2. Applying softwarization in a network slice.
Figure 5‐3. A tenant‐enabled network.
Figure 5‐4. High‐level overview on a typical MEC environment.
Figure 5‐5. E2E architecture overview [5].
Figure 5‐6. Functional split between NG‐RAN and 5G core [8].
Figure 5‐7. Comparison between the LTE and 5G QoS architecture [8][10].
Figure 5‐8. Abstract spectrum sharing architecture.
Figure 5‐9. Example of a 5G transport network reference architectural framework [20].
Figure 5‐10. 3GPP 5G system modularized architecture.
Figure 5‐11. Connecting an access‐agnostic core network with multiple access networks.
Figure 5‐12. Architectural options for roaming services; (a) conventional and (b) new option.
Figure 5‐13. Possible enhanced network controller architecture.
Figure 5‐14. Simplified architecture for interworking between 4G and 5G [10].
Figure 5‐15. Specific 4G/5G interworking options considered by 3GPP [29].
Figure 5‐16. LWA radio protocol architecture for the non‐collocated scenario [9].
Figure 5‐17. Non‐roaming architecture for the 5G CN with non‐3GPP access [10].
Chapter 06
Figure 6‐1. High‐level architecture of the 5G‐RAN [3][5] as assumed in this chapter. Note that for brevity here only gNBs and a 5G core network are depicted ‐ for (e)LTE / NR interworking scenarios, see Section 5.5.1.
Figure 6‐2. Examples for user plane NFs that are specific, agnostic or overarching w.r.t. AIVs or services.
Figure 6‐3. Comparison of UP processing between LTE and 5G (where the letter H indicates headers).
Figure 6‐4. Possibly service‐tailored protocol stack configurations in 5G [20][21].
Figure 6‐5. Layer 2 UP latency after service‐specific optimizations [23].
Figure 6‐6. Example NF instantiations in a 5G multi‐service and multi‐tenancy RAN [24].
Figure 6‐7. UP aggregation (left) and a possible RRC diversity option (right) for LTE‐A/5G multi‐connectivity [21].
Figure 6‐8. Additional bearer split and UP aggregation options for 5G/5G multi‐connectivity.
Figure 6‐9. Different variants of 5G/Wi‐Fi multi‐connectivity
[21]. Note that all 3 variants are possible with or without bearer split.
Figure 6‐10. Architectural evolution from 4G to 5G: Towards a two‐dimensional split into CP/UP NFs and CUs/DUs [27].
Figure 6‐11. Main horizontal split options for the 5G RAN, see also [5].
Figure 6‐12. RAN split interface data rate requirements for UP traffic [15][18].
Figure 6‐13. Likely most relevant overall split constellations in the 5G RAN [27][31].
Figure 6‐14. Deployment scenarios envisioned by 3GPP [5].
Figure 6‐15. Multi‐operator multi‐vendor indoor deployment scenarios considered by SCF.
Figure 6‐16. 3‐tier RAN functional split in view of different deployment scenarios.
Figure 6‐17. High‐level SD‐RAN architecture.
Chapter 07
Figure 7‐1. Converged heterogeneous network and compute infrastructures [5].
Figure 7‐2. (a) 5G transport control plane architecture, (b) Slice abstraction towards tenant.
Figure 7‐3. Generic network architecture. Exchange nodes contain different OLTs, which are part of a central office, in order to serve the different access trees.
Figure 7‐4. 5G‐XHaul components and resources: a) Unified mobile FH/BH over converged wireless/optical data centre networks, b) Functional split of DU processing, c) Elastic allocation of TSON resources for heavy CPRI traffic and light‐weight Ethernet flows.
Figure 7‐5. Self‐backhauling, i.e., sharing of radio technology and radio resources between BH and access links.
Figure 7‐6. High‐level Ethernet‐based encapsulation formats for different functional split options and example fields within the application “payload” field.
Figure 7‐7. Provider backbone bridging (PBB), constituting a MAC‐in‐MAC
format.
Figure 7‐8. a) Average traffic per BS based on the dataset [42], b)‐c) Total power consumption and total service delay over time for a traditional RAN and joint FH/BH scenarios with and without processing sharing.
Figure 7‐9. (a) Reference measurements of the platform without the splits, (b) Real‐time evaluation of the MAC/PHY splits for UDP based transferring of data. RT: Real time.
Figure 7‐10. Real‐time evaluation of the PDCP/RLC splits for different protocols. RT: Real time.
Figure 7‐11. (a) Monitoring in a converged FH using in‐line Ethernet “smart” probes, (b) Example of KPI extraction and monitoring (delay and frame‐delay variation, FDV) in an Ethernet FH.
Chapter 08
Figure 8‐1. Key principles of network slicing.
Figure 8‐2. Exemplary implementation of network slices in the 5G CN with common and slice‐specific NFs.
Figure 8‐3. Representative RAN slicing scenarios with different level of resource sharing and isolation.
Figure 8‐4. Slice‐aware MAC scheduling architecture.
Figure 8‐5. Examples for service‐ or slice‐specific network functions or configurations thereof [22].
Figure 8‐6. Slicing in the context of cross‐provider orchestration [26].
Figure 8‐7. E2E network slice example for 5G services on factory premises.
Figure 8‐8. Implementation options for multi‐slice resource management.
Figure 8‐9. Phases of network slice lifecycle management [30].
Figure 8‐10. Domain‐specific FCAPS management and lifecycle management of a network slice.
Chapter 09
Figure 9‐1. Security and trust domains in traditional networks.
Figure 9‐2. The impact of virtualization on the security and trust domains in 5G network.
Figure 9‐3. 5G security and trust domain paradigm.
Figure 9‐4. Key architectural differences between 4G and 5G, with implications on the approaches towards achieving transport infrastructure security.
Figure 9‐5. Automated 5G network security.
Figure 9‐6. Possible control, management and orchestration architecture supporting automated security [15].
Figure 9‐7. Details of NFV orchestrator.
Chapter 10
Figure 10‐1. Abstract view of basic SDN components.
Figure 10‐2. Abstract SDN architecture overview.
Figure 10‐3. Recursive hierarchical SDN architecture.
Figure 10‐4. ETSI NFV architecture [5].
Figure 10‐5. Development of YANG modules in IETF [10].
Figure 10‐6. Infrastructure and tenant SDN controllers in the NFV architecture.
Figure 10‐7. Peer controllers in the ONF architecture.
Figure 10‐8. 5GEx reference architectural framework [21].
Figure 10‐9. Functional architecture of 5GEx [21].
Figure 10‐10. Proposed hierarchical ABNO architecture including hierarchical levels topological view and detail of hABNO architecture.
Figure 10‐11. Possible architecture for autonomic management [36].
Figure 10‐12. Autonomic management control loop.
Chapter 11
Figure 11‐1. CCDF of the PAPR for DFT‐s‐OFDM and OFDM signals with/without PAPR reduction schemes (top) and corresponding EVM performance (bottom).
Figure 11‐2. Performance comparison of the waveform candidates for asynchronous UL access (scenario 1, top) and mixed numerology coexistence (scenario 2, bottom).
Figure 11‐3. PSD of different waveforms without any hardware impairments (top) and with phase noise (bottom).
Figure 11‐4. EVM performance of different waveforms with hardware impairments.
Figure 11‐5. Harmonized transmitter for multi‐carrier waveform generation.
Figure 11‐6. Turbo encoder with periodic puncturing.
Figure 11‐7. Tanner graph example of an ME‐LDPC code with a base graph size of 24 nodes.
Figure 11‐8. Channel polarization.
Figure 11‐9. Parity‐check Polar encoder including classical CRC Polar encoder.
Figure 11‐10. Hybrid beamforming with analogue RF beamforming.
Figure 11‐11. Practical examples of deployment scenarios of MMIMMO systems, see Section 3.4 in [9].
Figure 11‐12. Helsinki airport simulated deployment scenario.
Figure 11‐13. Sub‐frame design variants. GP: Guard Period.
Figure 11‐14. High‐level description of the three access protocols types considered: (a) Multi‐stage access protocol with an access, connection establishment and data phase; (b) Two‐stages access protocol with access and data phases; and (c) One‐stage access with combined access and data phase.
Chapter 12
Figure 12‐1. Overview of service classification techniques.
Figure 12‐2. Example mechanism for the service classification process.
Figure 12‐3. Performance evaluation results considering the indicative scenario.
Figure 12‐4. High‐level illustration of the main interfaces to the dynamic scheduler for unicast transmissions.
Figure 12‐5. Basic illustration of possible scheduling of users on a slot resolution for a TDD scenario, where
T
slot
is the time duration of a slot and UL/DL indicates UL/DL.
Figure 12‐6. Latency values from packet latency cumulative distribution function (CDF) with variable TTI configurations and offered loads for a mix of eMBB and low‐latency traffic © 2017 IEEE [25].
Figure 12‐7. Sketch of the basic principles of punctured scheduling on the DL shared data channel.
Figure 12‐8. Three transceivers: Ideal rate matching, puncturing at transmitter (Tx) only, and puncturing at both Tx and receiver (Rx) with (a) transport block size (TBS): 17568 bits, (b) TBS: 28366 bits [26]. QAM: Quadrature Amplitude Modulation.
Figure 12‐9. Overview of service flow delivery mechanism and 5G QoS architecture [4] [15] [30].
Figure 12‐10. Average percentage (%) of interfered links as functions of the number of concurrent links in 1 km
2
, without and with different PGIA algorithms.
Figure 12‐11. Average throughput (marked as THR in the figure) per link as a percentage (%) of the total throughput achievable by one single link as functions of the number of concurrent links in 1 km
2
, without and with different PGIA algorithms.
Figure 12‐12. The user throughput for each packet for the video service.
Figure 12‐13. NN operation in 5G dynamic radio topology.
Figure 12‐14. User throughput CDFs on DL with different deployment scenarios (a), (b), and (c), together with the throughput gain of the NN deployments compared to pico cell deployments at the 10th and the 50th percentiles of the CDFs (d). Mean user throughput (denoted as
φ
) levels are provided in the legends © 2017 IEEE [43].
Figure 12‐15. Mean user throughput for different NN activations © 2016 IEEE [44].
Figure 12‐16. Mean user throughput for different LAA NN Activations © 2017 IEEE [46].
Figure 12‐17. Basic SWCM encoder and decoder structures © 2016 IEEE [54].
Figure 12‐18. SWCM and MLD achievable rate regions © 2016 IEEE [54].
Figure 12‐19. Link‐level performance for the 2/2‐layer SWCM MIMO scheme, interference‐aware successive decoding (IASD), IAD, and MMSE‐IRC in the
MIMO Ped‐B interference channel with average INR of 15 dB © 2016 IEEE [54].
Figure 12‐20. Selection of dynamic TDD configuration with pilot contamination effect © 2017 IEEE [59].
Figure 12‐21. Left: Signaling steps in a centralized implementation, and Right: Greedy sequence assignment gains over random assignments.
Figure 12‐22. CDF of the total power consumption for 3 and 2 coordinated BSs employing joint transmission hybrid beamforming and joint transmission fully digital beamforming, respectively. The target spectral efficiency is 4 bit/s/Hz.
Figure 12‐23. SLA control loop.
Figure 12‐24. Flow chart of algorithm for RM for network slicing.
Figure 12‐25. Simulation results of RM for network slicing.
Figure 12‐26. (a) Integrated access and BH deployment scenario using sBH gNBs [74], (b) Normal RAN‐sBH operation, (c) Coordinated RAN‐sBH active‐mode operation [15] [70], see also Section 7.4.
Figure 12‐27. The RAN coordination layer concept and application for cell switch‐on/off.
Figure 12‐28. Framework for adaptive UE measurement configuration process © 2017 IEEE.
Chapter 13
Figure 13‐1. A day in the life of a 5G UE, showing basic control plane functionality.
Figure 13‐2. Example of 5G lean design compared to LTE for one PRB. Since there are no active users in the cell, the 5G cell can turn off the PDCCH symbols (yellow/light grey dots), decrease the periodicity of the synchronization signals (green/grey dots) and decrease the RS transmissions (red/black dots).
Figure 13‐3. Example of the relative 5G power consumption vs. LTE for different NR cell DTX probabilities.
Figure 13‐4. Example of configurable SS burst set transmission.
Figure 13‐5. Misdetection probability vs data SNR.
Figure 13‐6. Delay vs. overhead for a) synchronization phase and b) random access phase.
Figure 13‐7. On the left: the considered mmWave multi‐user system. On the right: an example of the convergence process of the GA‐based beamforming for systems with (
α
= 0.001) and without (
α
= 0) delay cost of the algorithm.
Figure 13‐8. Signaling exchange for grouping and for RACH attempt.
Figure 13‐9. Average collision rate for the group‐based system access compared with LTE.
Figure 13‐10. Comparison of the collision or retransmission probability for high‐ and low‐priority requests.
Figure 13‐11. 5G RRC state machine [16].
Figure 13‐12. Signaling procedure of mobility during Connected Inactive and RRC activation/inactivation [16].
Figure 13‐13. Inactivation with service specific configuration [16].
Figure 13‐14. RAN Tracking Areas [16].
Figure 13‐15. RTA update procedure [18].
Figure 13‐16. RAN‐based paging [18].
Figure 13‐17. UE in RRC Connected Inactive state transmits small packet in UL data.
Figure 13‐18. Slot scheme for the presented multi‐connectivity uplink measurement framework. Green and red dashed lines refer to the control messages exchanged via the legacy communication link and the high‐capacity backhaul connections, respectively.
Figure 13‐19. a) High‐ and low‐rise APs, b) two‐tier deployment.
Figure 13‐20. Possible system architectures involving cluster heads.
Figure 13‐21. Summary of signaling procedure for UE‐autonomous SgNB addition, change, and release.
Figure 13‐22. Signaling flow diagram illustrating the basic principles of synchronized RA‐less handover.
Figure 13‐23. Simple illustration of the timing diagram for synchronous RA‐less handover: (a) case where the UE receives data only from a single cell at time, (b) option with hysteresis time where the UE receives data from both cells.
Figure 13‐24. Mean measured cross‐correlations between the received signals in LOS and NLOS scenarios, as a function of the spacing between the forward predictor antenna and a rearward main antenna on the roof of a vehicle moving at 50 km/h. Results are shown without and with the use of a pre‐compensator of the mutual electromagnetic coupling between the antennas.
Figure 13‐25. Normalized MSE of the predictions of complex channel coefficients as a function of antenna separation, using the predictor antenna scheme – Left: theoretical limits for the NMSE, calculated from the measured correlations between the two antenna signals. Right: corresponding measured prediction performance.
Chapter 14
Figure 14‐1. D2D scenario with synchronization toward one BS.
Figure 14‐2. Overview of the synchronization effects of D2D sidelink transmission.
Figure 14‐3. a) OFDM waveform in the time domain affected by timing offset. b) Received OFDM spectrum for different values of sampling delay error.
Figure 14‐4. Waveform candidates for 5G, OFDM (top), FBMC (middle), UFMC (next page), time (left), frequency (right).
Figure 14‐5. BER performance with respect to the timing offset. The target BER determines the highest tolerable TO.
Figure 14‐6. Energy efficiency comparison between orthogonal and underlay discovery according to the announcers payload (A’s payload) [37].
Figure 14‐7. Procedure of autonomous discovery (broadcast message).
Figure 14‐8. Single cluster mean discovery time with HD and FD, assuming the IAN receiver and four frequency resources [39].
Figure 14‐9. Minimum discovery time for HD and FD assuming the IAN and the IC receiver [39].
Figure 14‐10. Effect of mobility on D2D communication reliability.
Figure 14‐11. Sphere packing in a motorway to select simultaneous transmitters. White vehicles transmit simultaneously, and black vehicles wait for other transmission opportunities.
Figure 14‐12. Selection of simultaneous transmitters for two different ranges.
Figure 14‐13. First ring of neighbours.
Figure 14‐14. The hidden node problem.
Figure 14‐15. Application of D2D communication in non‐public‐safety scenarios.
Figure 14‐16. Signalling diagram in multi‐cell scenario.
Figure 14‐17. System performance w.r.t. battery life.
Figure 14‐18. (a) Illustrations of D2D pairs, BS and cellular user distributions in the simulation (b) Performance comparisons between proposed cooperative D2D transmission method and without any cooperative method at different D2D pair number.
Chapter 15
Figure 15‐1. ITU‐R process and its alignment with 3GPP specifications.
Figure 15‐2. Traffic density for the “wide area coverage” deployment scenario.
Figure 15‐3. Coverage obtained for a 50 Mbps target user throughput in DL in the “wide area coverage” deployment scenario.
Figure 15‐4. User experienced data rate for the “video broadcasting” scenario.
Figure 15‐5. Packet loss rate for the “video broadcasting” scenario.
Figure 15‐6. Traffic volume density vs. packet arrival rate for dense urban information society.
Figure 15‐7. Packet reception ratio vs. distance in the Madrid Grid urban scenario.
Figure 15‐8. Relative increase of average DL throughput for different access priorities. Performance achieved at packet arrival rate of 1 packet/s (low load) is the baseline (100%).
Figure 15‐9. Relative increase of average packet transmission latency for different access priorities. Performance achieved at packet arrival rate of 1 packet/s (low load) is the baseline (100%).
Figure 15‐10. Illustration of power consumption behaviour of a BS with a constant power spectrum density.
Figure 15‐11. RAN energy efficiency for the dense urban information society use case.
Figure 15‐12. RAN energy efficiency gain for the dense urban information society use case over a baseline 4G deployment.
Figure 15‐13. Cumulative discounted cash flow of an MNO with different numbers of MNOs in the area [45].
Chapter 16
Figure 16‐1. Concept of a three‐band transmitter with an example of signal carrier positions.
Figure 16‐2. Architecture of a possible multi‐antenna transmitter.
Figure 16‐3. Architecture overview of the various stages of the IBFD SIC. The dashed parts are not used in the IBFD implementation.
Figure 16‐4. BS computational complexity in terms of number of real‐valued multiplications per Tx/Rx symbol – NR wideband.
Figure 16‐5. Multiplications and additions of the proposed harmonized and the non‐harmonized implementation of the six waveforms.
Figure 16‐6. Number of flops of the proposed harmonized and the non‐harmonized implementation of the six waveforms.
Figure 16‐7. REPLICA CMP [29] with
P
processors,
M
c
‐way multi‐mesh network and
P
active memory modules (P=processor core, I=instruction memory module, t=scratchpad, c=step cache, a=active memory unit, M=shared memory module, L=local memory module and S=switch).
Figure 16‐8. OpenAirInterface (OAI) three‐tier heterogeneous RAN architecture, see also Section 6.7.
Figure 16‐9. Considered C‐RAN network topology.
Figure 16‐10. FH throughput needed for 5 MHz and 10 MHz bandwidth.
Figure 16‐11. RTT of the FH and RF for 5 MHz/10 MHz bandwidth.
Figure 16‐12. User plane packet delay jitter for 5 MHz/10 MHz bandwidth.
Figure 16‐13. User plane good‐put of several deployment scenarios.
Figure 16‐14. User plane packet RTT for 5 MHz and 10 MHz BW.
Figure 16‐15. RRU prototype.
Figure 16‐16. Indoor deployment floorplan.
Figure 16‐17. Campus outdoor deployment.
Chapter 17
Figure 17‐1. The 3GPP standardization timeline for 5G [2].
Figure 17‐2. The ITU‐R IMT‐2020 (5G) timeline [8].
Figure 17‐3. 5G Pan‐European trials roadmap strategy [14].
Figure 17‐4. Promotion and uptake of next‐generation mobile service implementation projects in Japan.
Figure 17‐5. Nine promotion models considered in Japan.
Figure 17‐6. 5G R&D and system field trials in Japan.
Figure 17‐7. Trial examples, a) and b) at 4.5 GHz and 28 GHz, and c) at 28 GHz.
Figure 17‐8. 5G key five vertical services that Korea is interested in during 2018‐2022.
Figure 17‐9. SK Telecom's T5: The world's 1st 5G Connected Cars.
Figure 17‐10. SK Telecom's Happy Dream Park Baseball stadium.
Figure 17‐11. KT's 5G Trial Sites at Ganghwamun and PyeongChang.
Figure 17‐12. KT's 5G deployment plan for the 2018 Winter Olympics.
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
iii
iv
v
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
xxi
xxiv
xxv
xxv
xxvi
xxvii
xxix
xxx
xxxi
xxxii
xxxiii
xxxiv
xxxv
xxxvi
xxxvii
xxxviii
xxxix
xl
xli
xlii
xliii
xliv
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
79
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
263
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
451
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
Edited by
Patrick Marsch
Deutsche Bahn AG, Germany
Ömer Bulakçı
Huawei German Research Center (GRC), Germany
Olav Queseth
Ericsson Research, Sweden
Mauro Boldi
Telecom Italia, Italy
This edition first published 2018© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Patrick Marsch, Ömer Bulakc¸ı, Olav Queseth and Mauro Boldi to be identified as the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Office(s)John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial OfficeThe Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication data applied for
ISBN: 9781119425120
Cover Design: WileyCover Images: ©cono0430/Shutterstock; ©Iaremenko Sergii/Shutterstock
To my wife Ines and our kids Philipp and Daniel for their continuous love and support, and to the great team in Nokia Wrocław that I was privileged to work with in the past years.
Patrick Marsch
To my family for their continuous support and encouragement over the years and my big brother Mesut Bulakçı, MD for guiding me to the right career path at my early age.
Ömer Bulakçı
For Eskil, Ellen and Ester.
Olav Queseth
To the memory of my father Ivano.
Mauro Boldi
Adrian Kliks
Poznan University of Technology
Akira Matsunaga
KDDI
Alessandro Grassi
Politecnico di Bari
Alexandros Kaloxylos
University of Peloponnese
Ali Yaver
Nokia
Andreas Georgakopoulos
WINGS ICT Solutions
Anna Tzanakaki
University of Bristol
Antonio de la Oliva
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Athul Prasad
Nokia Bell Labs
Balázs Sonkoly
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Caner Kilinc
Ericsson
Carolina Canales
Ericsson
Catherine Douillard
IMT Atlantique
Chan Zhou
Huawei German Research Center
Changqing Yang
Huawei
Charbel Abdel Nour
IMT Atlantique
Chen Xiaobei
IMT 2020
Chia‐Yu Chang
EURECOM
Chris Pearson
5GAmericas
Christian Mannweiler
Nokia Bell Labs
Damiano Rapone
Telecom Italia
Daniel Calabuig
Universitat Politècnica de València
Daniel Camps Mur
I2CAT
Dario Sabella
Intel
David Garcia‐Roger
Universitat Politècnica de València
David Gutierrez Estevez
Samsung
David Martín‐Sacristán
Universitat Politècnica de València
Davide Sorbara
Telecom Italia
Didier Bourse
Nokia
Dieter Ferling
Nokia Bell Labs
Dimitra Simeonidou
University of Bristol
Dong Ku Kim
5G Forum Korea
Du Ho Kang
Ericsson
Eckhard Grass
IHP
Elena Trouva
NCSRD
Emmanouil Pateromichelakis
Huawei German Research Center
Evangelos Kosmatos
WINGS ICT Solutions
Felix Ngobigha
University of Essex
Fernando Sanchez Moya
Nokia
Frank Schaich
Nokia Bell Labs
Frederic Pujol
iDate
Fredrik Tillman
Ericsson
Gennaro Boggia
Politecnico di Bari
Gerd Zimmermann
Deutsche Telekom
Geza Koczian
University of Essex
Gian Michele Dell'Aera
Telecom Italia
Giorgio Calochira
Telecom Italia
Giovanna D'Aria
Telecom Italia
Giuseppe Piro
Politecnico di Bari
Hans Dieter Schotten
DFKI
Hans Otto Scheck
Nokia
Hao Lin
Orange
Hirsam El Shaer
Vodafone
Hitoshi Yoshino
Softbank
Hong Beom Jeon
Korea Telecom
Honglei Miao
Intel
Hua Wang
Keysight
Ioannis‐Prodromos Belikaidis
WINGS ICT Solutions
Jakob Belschner
Deutsche Telekom
Jan Christoffersson
Ericsson
Jesús Gutiérrez
IHP
Ji Lianghai
University of Kaiserslautern
Jian Luo
Huawei German Research Center
Jinhyo Park
SK Telecom
Jose Alcaraz‐Calero
UWS
Jose F. Monserrat
Universitat Politècnica de València
Josep M. Fabrega
CTTC
Josep Mangues
CTTC
Kai Habel
Fraunhofer HHI
Katerina Demesticha
WINGS ICT Solutions
Klaus Pedersen
Nokia Bell Labs
Kwang Taik Kim
Samsung
Laia Nadal
CTTC
László Toka
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Leonardo Gomes Baltar
Intel
Luciana Costa
Telecom Italia
Luis M. Campoy
Telefónica
Luis Miguel Contreras Murillo
Telefónica
Madalina Baltatu
Telecom Italia
Malte Schellmann
Huawei German Research Center
Marco Caretti
Telecom Italia
Marco Di Girolamo
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Marco Giordani
University of Padova
Marco Gramaglia
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Marco Mezzavilla
NYU
Maria Carmela De Gennaro
Magneti Marelli
Mark Doll
Nokia Bell Labs
Markos Anastasopoulos
University of Bristol
Marten Ericsson
Ericsson
Martin Kurras
Fraunhofer HHI
Mauro Boldi
Telecom Italia
Mehrdad Shariat
Samsung
Michael Färber
Intel
Michał Maternia
Nokia
Michela Svaluto Moreolo
CTTC
Mike Parker
University of Essex
Mikko Säily
Nokia Bell Labs
Milos Tesanovic
Samsung
Miquel Payaró
CTTC
Muhammad Shuaib Siddiqui
i2CAT
Nathan Gomes
University of Kent
Navid Nikaein
EURECOM
Nicolas Barati
NYU
Nikos Makris
UTH Nitlab
Nuno Pratas
Aalborg University
Nuria Molner
IMDEA Networks and Univ. Carlos III de Madrid
Nurul H. Mahmood
Aalborg University
Ömer Bulakc¸ı
Huawei German Research Center
Olav Queseth
Ericsson
Pablo Serrano
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Panagiotis Demestichas
University of Piraeus
Panagiotis Spapis
Huawei German Research Center
Paris Flegkas
UTH Nitlab
Patrick Marsch
Nokia (now Deutsche Bahn)
Paul Arnold
Deutsche Telekom
Peter Rost
Nokia Bell Labs
Philippos Assimakopoulos
University of Kent
Qi Wang
UWS
Raffaele D’Errico
CEA‐LETI
Raffaele de Peppe
Telecom Italia
Ramon Casellas
CTTC
Raúl Muñoz
CTTC
Rauno Ruismaki
Nokia Bell Labs
Raymond Knopp
EURECOM
Ricard Vilalta
CTTC
Riccardo Trivisonno
Huawei German Research Center
Salah El Ayoubi
Orange (now CentraleSupélec)
Samer Bazzi
Huawei German Research Center
Sandra Roger
Universitat Politècnica de València
Sergio Barberis
Telecom Italia
Shangbin Wu
Samsung
Shubhranshu
ITRI
Sinh L. H. Nguyen
Aalto University
Stavroula Vassaki
WINGS ICT Solutions
Stuart D. Walker
University of Essex
Sylvie Mayrargue
CEA‐LETI
Takehiro Nakamura
NTT DOCOMO
Tao Chen
VTT
Tapio Rautio
VTT
Taylan Şahin
Huawei German Research Center and Technische Universität Berlin
Terje Tjelta
Telenor
Thanasis Korakis
UTH Nitlab
Thomas Rosowski
Deutsche Telekom
Thorsten Wild
Nokia Bell Labs
Tomasz Mach
Samsung
Tommy Svensson
Chalmers University of Technology
Valerio Frascolla
Intel
Victor Lopez Alvarez
Telefónica
Vladica Sark
IHP
Volker Jungnickel
Fraunhofer HHI
Wei Jiang
DFKI
Wu Yong
Huawei
Xavier Costa
NEC
Yang Yang
Intel
Yinan Qi
Samsung
Yu Bao
Orange
Yukihiko Okumura
NTT DOCOMO
Yves Bellego
Orange
Digital technologies have a profound transformative impact on our societies and economies. The digital revolution opens the door to novel activities, applications and business cases that could not be envisaged before. As part of the Digital Single Market initiative launched as one of the ten priorities of the Juncker Commission, the European Commission proposed in 2016 an ambitious package of measures to foster the advent of a digital society and economy in Europe.
5G is an important pillar of this strategy. The European 5G vision co‐created with a multiplicity of actors is fully aligned with our wider digitization strategy, as 5G is designed to support smart connectivity in domains as diverse as the automotive, healthcare, factories, energy or media sectors.
The stakes are high. 5G has the potential to open new B2B businesses, whilst operators are currently facing a stagnation of their revenues in Europe. Market estimates point at a potential of € 550 billion extra revenues in 2025 from vertical industries, adding to the classical broadband consumer markets. The “connectivity package” released in September 2016 by the European Commission has thus proposed an ambitious strategy for 5G in Europe. It includes a new connectivity strategy moving Europe in the Gigabit/s connectivity era, a reform of the telecom regulatory framework with specific spectrum and investment friendly measures, and a 5G Action Plan with a package of actions to put in place the right framework conditions for the launch of 5G in Europe in 2020.
European efforts are indeed key to keep abreast of a fierce global competition. The USA and South Korea have already announced the deployment of early versions of 5G technology in 2018. Japan plans 5G introductions in 2020, and China pursues a bold technological development plan. These pre‐commercial initiatives are putting high pressure on the quick release of the required standards. In that context, it is imperative that the European 5G strategy targeting vertical markets gets quickly validated, both from a technology and business perspective. The 5G Action Plan consequently calls for early cross‐industry and large‐scale trials in Europe. These will be supported by the next phase of the 5G Public Private Partnership (5G PPP), a € 700 million Research and Innovation initiative launched in 2013 by the European Commission to materialize our bold ambitions in this domain.
The European 5G vision requires a versatile network platform that can adapt to demanding requirements of a multiplicity of business models, whilst current networks are more designed as “one size fits all” platforms. Moving towards 5G, deployment will largely piggyback on the results of previous phases of the 5G PPP, which have invested tremendous 5G research efforts in a multiplicity of domains, covering issues as diverse as new radio access technologies, network architectures with co‐operation of a multiplicity of fixed or mobile access networks including satellites, operation of new spectrum in the millimeter wave ranges, network virtualization, redesign of the core network, applications of software techniques to network management, as typical examples.
This book presents the results of the research carried out in these multiple domains during the first phase (2014‐16) of the 5G PPP. It shows an impressive set of technological achievements, unlocking many of the roadblocks on the road towards achieving the most demanding KPIs of 5G, such as data rates beyond 10 Gbit/s, latencies in the milliseconds range, or service creation and deployment within a few minutes. This work has also been instrumental in supporting the European industry to make informed choices for what concerns 5G standards and spectrum requirements and allocation.
I am grateful to all the colleagues who have shown undivided commitment to make 5G a reality in Europe, and I am sure that the readers will enjoy reading this book as a testimony to these efforts.
Khalil Rouhana, Deputy Director‐General in DG CONNECT,European Commission
As chairman of the 5G Infrastructure Association board, it is with great pleasure that I see this book come to fruition, and I welcome the chance to add a personal message of support. I believe this is a timely and important work, which in hindsight will be seen as one of the key results from the 5G pre‐standardization period.
Although not limited to only European research work, the major input to this book represents the key results from the 5G Public Private Partnership (5G‐PPP) research programme. Within the 5G PPP programme, the 5G Infrastructure Association (5G IA) is the organization which represents European industry. The 5G IA is committed to the advancement of 5G in Europe and to building global consensus on 5G. To this aim, the Association brings together a global industry community of telecoms & digital actors, such as operators, manufacturers, research institutes, universities, verticals and SMEs. I believe this book may play a useful role for this 5G IA goal of advancement of 5G, by providing a definitive source for the current state of 5G research.
This book is timely because we are at a water shed in both the 5G PPP and in terms of 5G in general. Within the 5G PPP, we are at a time where most of the phase 1 projects have completed or are about to complete. This means that a lot of the fundamental 5G research has been completed and the focus of the programme in phase 2 will move more towards demonstration of trial systems and integration of vertical domains such as automotive, e‐health and Industry 4.0. As such, it is a perfect time to document and disseminate the key results of those phase 1 5G PPP projects.
In terms of the broader view, 5G is also moving from the pre‐standardization to post‐standardization phase. At the time of writing this book, 3GPP has almost concluded on the so‐called first drop of 5G technology, focusing on non‐stand‐alone operation of 5G in conjunction with (e)LTE. This first drop will of course not include the complete functionality, and it is important to point out that standardization will need many years to completely specify 5G. Nonetheless, some aspects of 5G will be finalized in the near future, and the influence of the 5G PPP projects on many of the design choices made both through direct research and creation of pre‐standardization consensus should not be underestimated.
As well as giving an important snapshot of where we are in terms of 5G today and some clear guidance of where we think it should go in the future, I believe the depth and quality shown in this book is a clear validation for the vision and goals of the 5G PPP in general. There is still much work to do to make 5G a reality that lives up to the promised goals, and I believe this book is an important step on that journey.
Dr. Colin Willcock, Chairman of the Board, 5GInfrastructure Association
In the mid of 2015, the first phase of 5th Generation Public Private Partnership (5G PPP) projects kicked off, and the time until now has been hectic, but also very rewarding. During this period, 5G has moved from vision and concepts to technologies that are almost ready to be deployed, and we are glad and proud to have been part of this work.
This book is based on the outcome of 12 projects within the 5G PPP framework, as detailed in Section 1.2, and complemented by contributions from various additional 5G experts across the globe. We would like to thank all the contributors for the substantial effort and engagement invested into this book, despite the fact that the writing of the book collided with that of the final deliverables of most of the involved projects. In particular, we would like to express a big thank you to the main chapter editors for consolidating the often diverse viewpoints and terminologies used by different projects or entities into a coherent story. Knowing that many contributors have also spent their free time to finalize the book, and given that the work behind the development of new technologies like 5G is typically as demanding and time‐consuming as it is rewarding and inspiring, we would also like to thank the families of the contributors for their continuous patience and support.
Naturally, we would like to thank the European Commission for funding the projects that have led to this book, and in particular Bernard Barani for his personal support of the book.
Beyond the researchers who have been directly involved in the projects, there are of course much more persons involved in our home organizations. We would hence like to thank all our colleagues in the mobile communications industry, research institutes and universities for inspiring discussions, the contribution of ideas, and the help on various tasks.
Dr. Bulakçı would also like to thank Wu Jianjun and Dr. Egon Schulz from Huawei for the support in preparation of this book.
Last but not least, we would like to thank Sandra Grayson, Louis Manoharan and Adalfin Jayasingh from Wiley for the pleasant collaboration and continuous support throughout the writing and production process of this book.
Patrick Marsch, Ömer Bulakçı, Olav Queseth and Mauro BoldiOn behalf of the book contributors
Term
Meaning
3D
Three‐Dimensional
3G
3
rd
Generation (
cellular communications
)
3GPP
3
rd
Generation Partnership Project
4G
4
th
Generation (
cellular communications
)
5G
5
th
Generation (
cellular communications
)
5G AP
5G Action Plan
5G IA
5G Infrastructure Association
5G PPP
5
th
Generation Public Private Partnership
5GAA
5G Automotive Association
5GC
5G Core Network
5GMF
Fifth Generation Mobile Communication Promotion Forum
5GPoAs
5G Points of Attachment
5GTTI
5G Trial & Testing Initiative
AAS
Active Antenna System
ABG
Alpha Beta Gamma
ABS
Almost Blank Subframes
ABNO
Applications‐Based Network Operations
ACDM
Algebraic Channel Decomposition Multiplexing
ACK
Acknowledged
A‐CPI
Application‐Controller Plane Interface
ADB
Aggregated Data Bundle
ADC
Analog‐to‐Digital Converter
AE
Action Enforcer
AF
Application Function
AF‐x
Adaptation Function–
number
x
AI
Air Interface
AIV
Air Interface Variant
AL
Aggregation level
AM
Acknowledged Mode
AMC
Adaptive Modulation and Coding
AMF
Access and Mobility Management Function
AN
Access Network
ANDSF
Access Network Discovery and Selection Function
AN‐I
Access Network‐Inner (
layer
)
ANN
Artificial Neural Networks
AN‐O
Access Network‐Outer (
layer
)
ANQP
Access Network Query Protocol
AP
Access Point
API
Application Programming Interface
APT
Average Power Tracking
AR
Augmented Reality
ARIB
Association of Radio Industries and Businesses
ARP
Allocation and Retention Priority
ARPU
Average Revenue Per User
ARQ
Automatic Repeat reQuest
AS
Access Stratum
ASIC
Application Specific Integrated Circuit
AS‐PCE
Active Stateful Path Computation Element
ATIS
Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions
AUSF
Authentication Server Functions
BB
BaseBand
BBU
BaseBand Unit
BCH
Reed Muller or Bose, Ray‐Chaudhuri and Hocquenghem codes
BCJR
Bahl, Cocke, Jelinek and Raviv algorithm
BF
BeamForming
BF‐OFDM
Block‐Filtered OFDM
BH
BackHaul
BLER
Block Error Rate
BMS
Broadcast/Multi‐cast Services
BPSK
Binary Phase Shift Keying
BRP
Beam Resource Pool
BS
Base Station
BSM
Basic Safety Message
BSR
Buffer State Reporting
BSS
Business Support System
B‐TAG
Backbone VLAN Tag
BV
Bandwidth‐Variable
BVT
Bandwidth‐Variable Transponders
C/I
Carrier‐to‐Interference (
ratio
)
CA
Carrier Aggregation
CAGR
Compound Annual Growth Rate
CAM
Cooperative Awareness Messages
CAPEX
Capital Expenditures
CCDF
Complementary Cumulative Distribution Function
CCE
Control Channel Entity
CCH
Control Channel
CCNF
Common Control Network Functions
CCSA
China Communications Standards Association
CD
Code Division
CDF
Cumulative Distribution Function
CDMA
Code Division Multiple Access
CDN
Content Delivery Network
CH
Cluster Head
CI
Close‐In
CIoT
Cellular Internet of Things
C‐ITS
Cooperative‐ITS
CLI
Cross‐Link Interference
CMO
Control, Management and Orchestration
CMOS
Complementary Metal‐Oxide Semiconductor
CN
Core Network
CoMP
Coordinated/Cooperative Multi‐Point
COST
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
COTS
Commercial Off‐The‐Shelf
CP
Control Plane
CPE
Common Phase Error
CPM‐19
Conference Preparatory Meeting in 2019
CP‐OFDM
Cyclic Prefix OFDM
CPRI
Common Public Radio Interface
CPU
Central Processing Unit
CQI
Channel Quality Indicator
C‐RAN or CRAN
Centralized/Cloud Radio Access Network
CRC
Cyclic Redundancy Check
C‐RNTI
Cell Radio Network Temporary Identifier
CRS
Cell‐specific Reference Symbols
CSI
Channel State Information
CSIT
Channel State Information (
transmitter side
)
CSMA/CA
Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance
CSP
Communication Service Provider
CTC
Convolutional Turbo Codes
CTO
Chief Technology Officer
CU
Central Unit
D2D
Device‐to‐Device
D2N
Device‐to‐Network
DAC
Digital‐to‐Analog Converter
DAS
Distributed Antenna System
DBSCAN
Density‐Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise
DC
Dual Connectivity
DCC
Decentralized Congestion Control
DCI
Downlink Control Information
DCN
Dedicated Core Network
D‐CPI
Data‐Controller Plane Interface
DD‐OFDM
Direct Detection OFDM
DDoS
Distributed Denial of Service
DECOR
Dedicated Core
DEI
Drop Eligible Indicator
DEN
Decentralized Environmental Notification
DFT
Digital Fourier Transform
DFT‐s‐OFDM
DFT‐spread OFDM
DL
Downlink
DM
Decision‐Maker
DMC
Dense Multipath Component
DMRS
DeModulation Reference Signal
DNS
Domain Name System
DoS
Denial of Service
DPD
Digital Pre‐Distortion
DPDK
Data Plane Development Kit
DR
D2D Receiver
D‐RAN
Distributed Radio Access Network
DRB
Data Radio Bearer
DRX
Discontinuous Reception
DSC
Decentralized Congestion Control Sensitivity Control
DSP
Digital Signal Processor
DSRC
Dedicated Short Range Communications
DT
Decision Tree
DTT
Digital Terrestrial Television
DTX
Discontinuous Transmission
DU
Distributed Unit
DVB
Digital Video Broadcasting
DWDM
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing
E2E
End‐to‐End
EATA
European Automotive‐Telecom Alliance
EC
European Commission
ECDSA
Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
EDCA
Enhanced Distributed Channel Access
eDECOR
evolved DECOR
eICIC
Enhanced Inter‐Cell Interference Coordination
eIMTA
Enhanced Interference Mitigation and Traffic Adaptation
EIRP
Effective Isotropic Radiated Power
eLTE
enhanced Long‐Term Evolution
EM
Element Management
eMBB
enhanced Mobile BroadBand
eMBMS
enhanced Mobile Broadband Multimedia Services
EMF
Electro‐Magnetic Field
eNB
enhanced Node‐B
EPC
Enhanced Packet Core
ePDCCH
enhanced PDCCH
EPS
Evolved Packet System
ET
Envelope Tracking
ETH
Ethernet
ETN
Edge Transport Nodes
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
EU
European Union
E‐UTRA
Evolved‐UTRA
EVM
Error Vector Magnitude
F1
Horizontal interface in the RAN
F1‐C
Horizontal interface in the RAN (control plane)
F1‐U
Horizontal interface in the RAN (user plane)
FBMC
Filter Bank Multi‐Carrier
FBR
Front‐to‐Back Ratio
FCAPS
Fault Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security
FCC
Federal Communications Commission
FC‐OFDM
Flexibly Configured – OFDM
FD
Full Duplex
FDD
Frequency Division Duplexing
FDM
Frequency Division Multiplexing
FDMA
Frequency Division Multiple Access
FDV
Frame‐Delay Variation
FEC
Forward Error Correction
FeICIC
Further enhanced Inter‐Cell Interference Coordination
FFT
Fast Fourier Transform
FH
Fronthaul
FI
Float Intercept
FIR
Finite Impulse Response
FN
False Negatives
FP
False Positives
FPGA
Field Programmable Gate Array
FQAM
Frequency Quadrature Amplitude Modulation
FS
Feature Selection
Fs‐C
Intra‐RAN control plane interface
FSPL
Free‐Space Path Loss
Fs‐U
Intra‐RAN user plane interface
FTP
File Transfer Protocol
FTTA
Fiber‐to‐the‐Antenna
GA
Genetic Algorithm
GAA
General Authorized Access
GaN
Gallium Nitride
GAN
Generic Access Network
GDB/GLDB
GeoLocation DataBase
GEPON
Gigabit Ethernet PON
GFDM
Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing
GLOSA
Green Light Optimal Speed Advice
GMPLS
Generalized Multi‐Protocol Label Switching
gNB
Gigabit (enhanced) Node‐B
GOPS
Giga Operations
GPON
Gigabit PON
GPP
General Purpose Processing
GPRS
General Packet Radio Service
GPS
Global Positioning System
GSCM
Geometry‐based Stochastic Channel Model
GSM
Global System for Mobile Communications
GTP
GPRS Tunnelling Protocol
GUI
Graphical User Interface
HARQ
Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest
HD
High Definition
HO
HandOver
HPA
High Power Amplifier
HSIC
Hybrid Self Interference Cancellation
HSPA
High‐Speed Packet Access
HSS
Home Subscriber System
HSTD
Horizontal Security and Trust Domains
HTHP
High Tower High Power
HW
Hardware
I2I
Indoor‐to‐Indoor
IaaS
Infrastructure‐as‐a‐Service
IAD
Interference‐Aware Detection
IAN
Interference‐as‐Noise
IASD
Interference‐Aware Successive Decoding
IAT
Inter‐Arrival Time
IATN
Inter Area Transport Node
IBFD
In‐Band Full‐Duplex
ICI
Inter Carrier Interference
ICIC
Inter‐Cell Interference Coordination
I‐CPI
Intermediate‐Controller Plane Interface
ICT
Information and Communications Technology
ID
Identifier
IDFT
Inverse DFT
IEEE
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
IETF
Internet Engineering Task Force
iFFT
inverse Fast Fourier Transform
IFOM
IP Flow Mobility
IIC
Industrial Internet Consortium
IIR
Infinite Impulse Response
IMS
IP Multimedia Subsystem
IMT
International Mobile Telecommunications
IMT2020 or IMT‐2020
IMT for year 2020 and beyond
IMT‐A
IMT‐Advanced
INR
Interference‐to‐Noise Ratio
IoT
Internet of Things
IP
Internet Protocol
IPr
Intellectual Property
IPsec
Internet Protocol Security
IPv4
Internet Protocol version 4
IPv6
Internet Protocol version 6
IQ
Inphase and Quadrature Phase
IR
Incremental Redundancy
IR‐HARQ
incremental redundancy HARQ
ISD
Inter‐Site Distance
ISG
Industry Standard Group (in ETSI)
ISI
Inter Symbol Interference
ISM
Industrial, Scientific and Medical
ISO
International Organization for Standardization
IT
Information Technology
I‐TAG
Backbone Service Instance Tag
ITS
Intelligent Transport Systems
ITU
International Telecommunication Union
ITU‐R
ITU ‐ Radiocommunication sector
JT
Joint transmission
KED
Knife Edge Diffraction
KPI
Key Performance Indicator
KSP
Known Symbol Padding
KTX
Korea Train eXpress
LAA
License(d)‐Assisted Access
LBT
Listen‐Before‐Talk
LCP
Logical Channel Prioritization
LD
Linear Discriminant
LDM
Local Dynamic Map
LDPC
