95,99 €
Hepatologists, both researchers and front-line clinicians, now have a comprehensive guide to the treatment of patients with the HCV virus. This book focuses mainly on the efficacy and clinical use of antiviral therapies, including the use of antivirals post liver transplantation and in the presence of the HIV virus. It also explores the foundations for understanding antiviral therapies in HCV, such as the complex pharmacology and mechanisms of antiviral drugs. A 'late-breaking information' chapter contains the most recent trial results on the latest antiviral drugs.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 590
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2011
Contents
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Contributors
Preface
Section I: Foundations for Understanding Antiviral Therapies in HCV
Chapter 1: HCV Replication
Introduction
The HCV Genome
Models to Study HCV Replication
The HCV Virion and Entry
HCV Replication
Chapter 2: Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes
Introduction
HCV Genotypes and Subtypes
Intergenotypic Recombinants
Quasispecies
Genotype-Specific Effects of HCV Proteins on Response to Antiviral Therapy
Insulin Resistance
Steatosis
Conclusion
Chapter 3: Immune Responses to HCV: Implications for Therapy
Introduction
Humoral Immune Responses to HCV
Adaptive Cellular Immune Responses to HCV
HCV and Immune Evasion: Mechanisms of Viral Persistence
Immune Responses to HCV: Implications for HCV Therapy
Concluding Remarks
Chapter 4: Mechanisms of Action of Antiviral Drugs: The Interferons
Introduction
Hepatocyte Response to HCV Infection
Recognition of HCV by RIG-I and TLR-3
Activation and Antagonism of HCV Recognition Pathways
Interferon-stimulated Genes and HCV Control
ISGs and Prediction of Treatment Outcome in CHC Infection
IL28B and its Prediction to CHC Treatment Response and Spontaneous Clearance
Concluding Remarks
Chapter 5: Pharmacology and Mechanisms of Action of Antiviral Drugs: Ribavirin Analogs
Introduction
Ribavirin
Ribavirin Analogs
Levovirin
Taribavirin
Inosine 5′-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase (IMPDH) Inhibitors
Summary
Chapter 6: Pharmacology and Mechanisms of Action of Antiviral Drugs: Polymerase Inhibitors
Introduction
Nucleoside Inhibitors
Non-Nucleoside Inhibitors
Perspectives
Acknowledgments
Chapter 7: Pharmacology and Mechanisms of Action of Antiviral Drugs: Protease Inhibitors
Introduction
Need for Improved Anti-HCV Therapies
Design of NS3 Protease Inhibitor Ciluprevir/BILN 2061: First Anti-HCV Proof-of-Concept in Humans
NS3 Protease Inhibitors in Clinical Development
Challenges and Future Directions
Acknowledgments
Chapter 8: Measuring Antiviral Responses
HCV RNA Level Measurement
Response-Guided Therapy with Current Standard-of-Care
Response-Guided Therapy with Future Standard-of-Care
Section II: Efficacy and Clinical Use of Antiviral Therapies
Chapter 9: Genotype 1: Standard Treatment
Goals of Therapy
Duration of Treatment
Deriving the Regimen
Monitoring Treatment Response
Medication Dosing
Side Effects and Dose Adjustments
Identifying Candidates for Therapy
The Future
Chapter 10: Individually Tailored Treatment Strategies in Treatment-naïve Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Patients
Introduction
Assessment of Baseline Viral Load
Viral Kinetics during Therapy: When to Measure HCV-RNA in Serum
Is it Possible to Further Individualize Treatment Beyond the Time Points of Weeks 4, 12, and 24?
Impact of Ribavirin in Individualized Treatment Strategies for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection
Patients in Whom Shorter Treatment Durations May Not Be Considered
Impact of IL28B Genotype on Treatment Individualization
Summary
Chapter 11: Genotype 1 Relapsers and Non-responders
The Burden of Failures of Anti-HCV Therapy
Management of Patients Who Failed to Respond to Antiviral Therapy
Emerging Treatments
Conclusion
Chapter 12: Standard Therapy for Genotypes 2/3
Introduction
Peginterferon Alfa and Ribavirin for Genotype 2 or 3
Differences in Response to Treatment between HCV Genotype 2 and 3 Infections
Relevance of a Rapid Virological Response in HCV Genotype 2 or 3
Peg-IFN Formulations, Ribavirin Dose, and Response to Treatment
Albinterferon in the Treatment of Hepatitis C Genotype 2 or 3
Duration of Treatment in Hepatitis C Genotype 2 or 3
Treatment of Patients with Advanced Liver Disease
Predictors of Treatment Response: Other Factors to Consider
Long-Term Outcome of Peg-IFN Alfa and RBV Treatment
Summary and Conclusions
Chapter 13: Altered Dosage or Durations of Current Antiviral Therapy for HCV Genotypes 2 and 3
Background
Variable Length of Antiviral Therapy
Studies Randomizing Patients at Baseline to Short or Standard Treatment Duration
Conquering HCV Clearance in All Patients
Optimal Treatment Duration for Non-RVR Patients
Dosages of Peginterferon Alfa
Dosages of Ribavirin
Conclusions
Chapter 14: Genotypes 2 and 3 Relapse and Non-response
Background
Why Do Patients Infected with Genotypes 2 and 3 Not Have SVR?
Preventing Treatment Failure in G2/G3 Patients
Management of Relapse or Non-response to Antiviral Therapy
Management of Relapse in Patients Who Underwent Short Treatment Regimens
Future Therapies for Patients Who Experienced a Treatment Failure
Acknowledgments
Chapter 15: Hepatitis C Genotype 4 Therapy: Progress and Challenges
HCV Genotype 4: Shifting Epidemiology
Treatment of Chronic HCV-4 Naïve Patients
Duration of Chronic HCV-4 Therapy
The Efficacy of Different Pegylated Interferon Formulations in HCV-4 Infections
HCV-4 Therapy in Special Populations
Emerging New Regimen for Treatment of Chronic HCV-4
Personalizing Chronic HCV-4 Therapy
Conclusions and Future Prospects
Chapter 16: Antivirals in Acute Hepatitis C
Diagnosis of Acute Hepatitis C
Prevention of HCV Transmission
Treatment of Acute Hepatitis C
Timing of Therapy
Duration of Therapy
Is Ribavirin Needed to Treat Acute Hepatitis C?
Conclusions
Chapter 17: Antivirals in Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension
Introduction
Compensated Cirrhosis
Decompensated Cirrhosis
Maintenance Interferon
Side Effects
Conclusions
Chapter 18: Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis C Following Liver Transplantation
Introduction
Timing of Antiviral Therapy
Tolerability of Current Antiviral Therapy
Efficacy of Current Antiviral Therapy for Established Chronic Hepatitis
Future Antiviral Strategies
Summary
Chapter 19: Antiviral Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection with Extrahepatic Manifestations
Introduction
HCV-Associated Mixed Cryoglobulinemia Vasculitis
HCV-Associated B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Other HCV-Associated Extrahepatic Manifestations
Conclusion
Chapter 20: Cytopenias: How they Limit Therapy and Potential Correction
Mechanisms by which Interferon Contributes to Cytopenia
Mechanisms by Which Ribavirin Contributes to Anemia
Management of Neutropenia
Management of Thrombocytopenia
Management of Anemia
The Importance of Assessing Response During Therapy
Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest
Chapter 21: The Problem of Insulin Resistance and its Effect on Therapy
Introduction
Defining Insulin Resistance
Insulin Signaling
Molecular Mechanisms of Insulin Resistance in CHC
Host Factors Influencing IR
Effect of IR on Treatment Response
Management Strategies for CHC in the Setting of IR
Summary
Chapter 22: HIV and Hepatitis C Co-infection
Global Prevalence of HIV/HCV Co-Infection
Natural History of HCV in HIV Co-infection
Diagnosis and Monitoring of HCV in HIV Infection
Treatment of HIV-HCV Co-infection
Management of Treatment Non-Response and End-Stage Liver Disease
New Directions in Therapy
Chapter 23: HCV and Racial Differences
Introduction
Epidemiology
Treatment
Summary
Chapter 24: HCV and the Pediatric Population
Epidemiology and Natural History
Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future
Special Treatment Considerations for Pediatric Populations
Chapter 25: New Horizons: IL28, Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy for HCV
Introduction
NS3/4A Protease Inhibitors
NS5B Polymerase Inhibitors
NS5B Nucleos(t)ide Inhibitors
NS5B Non-Nucleos(t)ide Inhibitors
NS5A Inhibitors
Cyclophilin Inhibitors
Other DAA Targets
Other Novel Therapeutic Approaches
Drug Resistance
Combination Strategies
IL28B Polymorphism
Unresolved Issues
Summary and Conclusions
Authors’ Declaration of Personal Interests
Index
This edition first published 2012 © 2012 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell Publishing was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell's publishing program has been merged with Wiley's global Scientific, Technical and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell.
Registered office: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting a specific method, diagnosis, or treatment by physicians for any particular patient. The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. Readers should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization or Website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or Website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet Websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. No warranty may be created or extended by any promotional statements for this work. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any damages arising herefrom.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Advanced therapy for hepatitis C / edited by Geoffrey W. McCaughan, John G. McHutchison, Jean-Michel Pawlotsky. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-8745-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-4051-8745-X (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-1-4443-4631-2 (ePDF) ISBN-13: 978-1-4443-4634-3 (Wiley Online Library) [etc.] 1. Hepatitis C–Treatment. 2. Antiviral agents. I. McCaughan, Geoffrey W. II. McHutchison, J. G. III. Pawlotsky, Jean-Michel. [DNLM: 1. Hepatitis C–therapy. 2. Antiviral Agents–therapeutic use. WC 536] RC848.H425A38 2012 616.3′62306–dc23 2011016561
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
This book is published in the following electronic formats: ePDF 9781444346312; Wiley Online Library 9781444346343; ePub 9781444346329; Mobi 9781444346336
Contributors
Nezam H. Afdhal MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USA
Angelo Andriulli MD Gastroenterology Department IRRCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
Martin Baril PhD Research Associate Institut de Recherche en Immunologie et Cancérologie (IRIC) Montréal, Québec, Canada
Michael R. Beard PhD Head, Hepatitis C Virus Research Laboratory School of Molecular and Biomedical Science The University of Adelaide & Center for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology Adelaide, SA, Australia
Thomas Berg MD Professor Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology Division of Hepatology University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany
David G. Bowen MBBS, PhD Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, NSW, Australia
Patrice Cacoub MD, PhD Professor Department of Internal Medicine Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
Laurent Chatel-Chaix PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Institut de Recherche en Immunologie et Cancérologie (IRIC) Montréal, Québec, Canada
Grace M. Chee PharmD Hepatology Department Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, CA, USA
Stéphane Chevaliez PharmD, PhD National Reference Center for Viral Hepatitis B, C and delta Department of Virology & INSERM U955 Hôpital Henri Mondor Université Paris-Est Créteil, France
Lotte Coelmont PhD Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy Rega Institute for Medical Research University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium
Antonio Craxì, MD Full Professor of Gastroenterology Sezione di Gastroenterologia, Di.Bi.M.I.S. Policlinico Paolo Giaccone University of Palermo Palermo, Italy
Leen Delang PhD Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy Rega Institute for Medical Research University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium
Gregory J. Dore BSc, MBBS, MPH, PhD, FRACP Professor and Head, Viral Hepatitis Clinical Research Program National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research The University of New South Wales; Infectious Diseases Physician St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, NSW, Australia
Mark W. Douglas BSc (Med)(Hons), MBBS (Hons), PhD, FRACP Senior Lecturer, Hepatology and Virology Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute Sydney Emerging Infections and Biosecurity Institute University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia
Xavier Forns MD, PhD Liver Senior Specialist Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic IDIBAPS and Ciberehd (Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas) Barcelona, Spain
Mathy Froeyen PhD Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry Rega Institute for Medical Research University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium
Ed Gane MB ChB, MD, FRACP Associate Professor and Hepatologist New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit Auckland City Hospital Auckland, New Zealand
Jacob George MBBS (Hons), FRACP, PhD Director of Gastroenterology and Hepatic Services Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millenium Institute University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia
Rebekah G. Gross MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Weill Cornell Medical College New York, NY, USA
Piet Herdewijn PhD Professor of Pharmacy Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry Rega Institute for Medical Research University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium
Ira M. Jacobson MD Vincent Astor Professor of Medicine Chief, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Weill Cornell Medical College New York, NY, USA
Sanaa M. Kamal MD, PhD Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Ain Shams Faculty of Medicine Cairo, Egypt; Department of Gastroenterology Tufts School of Medicine Boston, MA, USA
Daniel Lamarre PhD Full Professor, Department of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC) Université de Montréal Montréal, Québec, Canada
Alessandra Mangia MD Liver Unit IRRCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
Diarmuid S. Manning MB, BCh Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
Stella Martínez MD Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic IDIBAPS and Ciberehd (Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas) Barcelona, Spain
Gail V. Matthews MBChB, MRCP (UK), FRACP, PhD Clinical Academic National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
Geoffrey W. McCaughan MBBS, PhD, FRACP Head of Liver Immunobiology Program Centenary Research Institute A.W. Morrow Professor of Medicine Director A.W. Morrow GE/Liver Center Director Australian Liver Transplant Unit Royal Prince Alfred Hospital University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia
John G. McHutchison, MD Senior Vice President, Liver Disease Therapeutics Gilead Sciences, Inc. Foster City, CA, USA
Leonardo Mottola PhD Liver Unit IRRCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
Andrew J. Muir MD MHS Director, Gastroenterology/Hepatology Research Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC, USA
Johan Neyts PhD Professor of Virology Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy Rega Institute for Medical Research University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium
Venessa Pattullo MBBS, FRACP Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Division of Gastroenterology Toronto Western Hospital University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky MD, PhD Director, French National Reference Center for Viral Hepatitis B, C and delta Head, Department of Virology, Bacteriology, and Hygiene INSERM U955 Hôpital Henri Mondor Université Paris Est Créteil, France
Salvatore Petta MD, PhD Sezione di Gastroenterologia, Di.Bi.M.I.S. Policlinico Paolo Giaccone University of Palermo Palermo, Italy
Fred Poordad MD Associate Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; Chief, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, CA, USA
Scott A. Read MSc Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia
Jose María Sánchez-Tapias MD, PhD Senior Consultant Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic IDIBAPS and Ciberehd (Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas) Barcelona, Spain
Kathleen B. Schwarz MD Director, Pediatric Liver Center Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Professor of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA
Mitchell L. Shiffman MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia Bon Secours Virginia Health System Richmond and Newport News, VA, USA
Benjamin Terrier MD Department of Internal Medicine Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Université Paris 6 Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
Alexander J. Thompson MD, PhD St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL), North Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Durham, NC, USA
Edmund Tse MBBS, FRACP School of Molecular and Biomedical Science The University of Adelaide and the Center for Cancer Biology SA Pathology Adelaide, SA, Australia
Heiner Wedemeyer MD Professor Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover, Germany
Johannes Wiegand MD Private Lecturer Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology Division of Hepatology University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany
Kenneth Yan MBBS, Mmed (Clin Epi), FRACP Conjoint Associate Lecturer St George Clinical School Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
Amany Zekry MBBS, PhD, FRACP Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinical School of Medicine St George Hospital Sydney, NSW, Australia
Preface
Hepatitis C virus results in chronic liver disease in over 170 million people worldwide. This book arrives at a watershed in the history of antiviral treatment of the hepatitis C virus. It is the beginning of the end of non-specific antiviral approaches via interferon-based therapies. From now on the field will be dominated by the arrival of HCV-specific direct antiviral agents. Initially these agents will still require interferon and ribavirin but already clinical trials are under way that do not include either of these agents.
This publication outlines the current standard of care up until this time and includes therapeutic approaches to wide patient groups. We believe that the structure of the book will remain relevant for future editions as the new therapies are gradually rolled out across these patient groups, as well as across an increasing number of countries.
G.W.M. J.G.M. J-M.P.
I
Foundations for Understanding Antiviral Therapies in HCV
1
HCV Replication
Michael R. Beard
School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is classified in the Hepacivirus genus within the family Flaviviridae and is the leading cause of chronic hepatitis and liver disease related morbidity worldwide. With an estimated 170 million people infected worldwide and the ability of the virus to establish a chronic infection in approximately 70% of cases, it is not surprising that HCV represents a major cause of global suffering and morbidity and a burden to many public health systems. Chronic HCV infection is often associated with development of serious liver disease, including cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Accordingly, a thorough understanding of the life cycle and molecular biology of HCV and its interaction with the host are essential in the development of treatment and vaccine strategies. Although these studies have been hampered by the lack of a small-animal model and, until recently, a lack of a tissue culture system that accurately reflects the life cycle of HCV, significant progress has been made in the understanding of HCV molecular biology and pathogenesis. In this chapter we discuss recent advances in models to study HCV replication and the HCV life cycle.
The HCV Genome
HCV possesses a 9.6 kb single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome composed of a 5′ UTR (untranslated region), a long open-reading frame (ORF) encoding a polyprotein of approximately 3000 amino acids, and a 3′ UTR (Figure 1.1). The polyprotein can be divided into three segments based on the functional aspects of the proteins: the NH2 terminal region comprises the structural proteins (core, E1, and E2); a central region consists of two proteins (p7 and NS2) that are not involved in HCV replication or are structural components of the virus, but probably play a role in virion morphogenesis; and the COOH-terminal proteins (NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B) that are required for HCV replication (Figure 1.1). A detailed description and function of the HCV proteins can be found in an excellent review from Moradpour and colleagues [1]. After release of the HCV genome into the cytoplasm the genome is exposed to the host cellular machinery for translation of the viral polyprotein. The 5′ and 3′ UTRs are highly conserved and critical to viral genome replication and translation of the viral polyprotein. The 5′ UTR is approximately 341 nucleotides long and contains a highly structured RNA element known as the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) that is recognized by the cellular 40S ribosomal subunit to initiate translation of the RNA genome in a cap-independent manner. The importance of the secondary and tertiary structure of the IRES domain for initiation of translation has been demonstrated by mutational analysis. However, the primary sequence, particularly in stem-loop IIId and IIIe, is also critical for efficient HCV IRES activity [2,3]. Recently, the structural nature of HCV IRES interactions with the 40S ribosomal subunit and the eIF3 complex has been revealed by cryo-electron microscopy [4,5]. Preceding the IRES at the extreme 5′ end are elements required for viral replication that overlap partially with the IRES region (domain II), leading to speculation that this region is involved in regulation of a viral translation to replication switch [6]. Consistent with this speculation is the recent observation that a short highly conserved RNA segment at the 5′ end of the HCV genome binds a liver-specific microRNA, miR-122, that is required for efficient HCV replication in cultured hepatoma cells [7]. However, in the HCV-infected liver no correlation was noted between miR-122 abundance and levels of HCV RNA in the liver or serum, which suggests that the impact of miR-122 may be less prominent in vivo than in vitro [8]. miR-122 may impact HCV replication indirectly through stimulation of translation of the viral polyprotein by enhancing association of ribosomes with the IRES [9]. Although more work is required to determine its role in the HCV life cycle and pathogenesis, modulation of miR-122 expression and activity presents as an attractive target for future therapy.
Figure 1.1 Genomic organization and polyprotein processing of the HCV genome. The HCV genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA genome that is flanked by 5′ and 3′ UTRs of highly ordered secondary structure. The polyprotein is cleaved by either host- or viral-encoded proteases (depicted by triangles) to liberate the mature structural and non-structural proteins.
Like the 5′ UTR, the 3′ UTR of the HCV genome contains a high degree of secondary structure. This region is 200–300 nucleotides in length and is comprised of three major elements involved in replication: (i) a variable region (30–50 nucleotides), which directly follows the NS5B stop codon; (ii) a polyuridine (U/C) tract (20–200 nucleotides); and (iii) a highly conserved region (98 nucleotides), known as the 3′ X region, which forms a three stem-loop structure [10,11,12]. Mutational analysis has revealed that the poly-U/C tract and the 3′ X region play a more important role than the variable region in the synthesis of negative-strand RNA [13].
Models to Study HCV Replication
HCV Replicons
The development of the subgenomic HCV replicon system, first reported in 1999, significantly enabled the study of HCV replication in cultured cells for the first time [14]. Replicons represent autonomously replicating HCV RNAs, and typically contain an in-frame insertion of a selectable antibiotic marker (e.g., neomycin phosphotransferase: G418) within the amino terminal HCV core sequence, followed downstream by a heterologous IRES from encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), a picornavirus, to drive internal translation of the downstream HCV open reading frame (NS2 to NS5B) (Figure 1.2). The minimal requirements for a viable HCV replicon are HCV-derived 5′ and 3′ termini and the non-structural proteins (NS3 to NS5B) that form the replication complex, however, replication-competent HCV replicons encoding the complete HCV polyprotein are viable [15,16]. Transfection of Huh-7 (hepatoma-derived) cells with synthetically derived transcripts followed by selection with G418 results in the establishment of cell lines that harbor autonomous replication of the virus. HCV RNA isolated from cell lines under antibiotic selection often contains cell-culture adapted mutations that greatly enhance replication, although the molecular basis for this increased replication is unclear [15,17,18]. These adaptive mutations often map to the NS5A protein and may potentially influence phosphorylation, resulting in a hypophosphorylated state and increased replication. Adaptive mutations have also been mapped to NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5B. Interestingly, these replication-adaptive cell-culture mutations have been shown to reduce in vivo infectivity in chimpanzees, highlighting the adaptive nature of these viruses derived from cell culture [19]. HCV replicons are not restricted to Huh-7 cells, and other cell lines such as HeLa and cells of murine origin have also yielded selected clones of replicating HCV, highlighting that HCV replication is not restricted to liver-derived cells of human origin [20,21].
Figure 1.2 Schematic diagram of the organization of the (a) genomic and (b) subgenomic HCV replicons. In both cases the HCV IRES drives expression of the neomycin phosphotransferase gene while the EMCV IRES drives expression of the HCV proteins.
The antibiotic selection process not only selects for HCV genomes with high replication capacity but also clones of Huh-7 cells that are highly permissive for HCV infection. One such cell line, Huh-7.5, has been “cured” of HCV by treatment with low doses of interferon-α, is hyperpermissive for HCV replication [22], and is clearly enriched for factors that promote replication and/or defects in innate viral sensing pathways. For example, Huh-7.5 cells have a spontaneous knockout of the dsRNA cellular sensing protein RIG-1 and do not mount a robust antiviral response to viral infection that allows for HCV replication. This highlights the importance of innate immune sensing in HCV infection and is consistent with the ability of the HCV NS3/4A protein to cleave IPS-1, which is integral to the innate immune RIG-I pathway [23].
HCV replicons have been valuable tools for studying numerous aspects of the HCV life cycle and interaction with the host cell. However, their major limitation has been inability to produce infectious virus particles even when the complete complement of HCV proteins is expressed, for reasons that are not entirely clear [15,16,22]. The original replicon concept has undergone evolution and replicons are now available that contain various markers (e.g., GFP, luciferase) that allow quantitative assessment of HCV replication and have been useful in high-throughput screening of antiviral compounds.
Productive Viral Infection in Cell Culture
The recent identification in 2005 of a cloned HCV genome (genotype 2a), known as JFH-1, that is capable of initiating high-level replication in cell culture and production of infectious virus particles represents a major breakthrough in the pursuit of a cell-culture model for HCV [24,25]. In contrast to HCV replicon systems, transfection of Huh-7 cells with RNA synthesized in vitro from the cloned JFH-1 cDNA genome and a related genotype 2a chimera, FL-J6/JFH replicate efficiently in Huh-7 cells without the need for cell-culture adaptive mutations. Moreover, virus particles produced by these cells are infectious in chimpanzees and can be serially passaged in vivo [25] while the FL-J6/JFH virus can infect mice containing human liver grafts [24]. Interestingly, virus produced in vivo has a lower buoyant density than virus produced in cell culture, suggesting association with low-density lipids [26]. This system represents a major advance in the study of virus-host interactions and the virus life cycle, all in the context of replicating virus. Similarly, the highly adapted genotype 1a HCV isolate known as H77-S (derived from the H77 isolate) [27] is also capable of instigating HCV RNA replication and production of infectious virus particles [28]. This represents another breakthrough in the generation of tools to study the HCV life cycle, particularly because this genotype is more prevalent worldwide and is associated with more significant liver disease. Intragenotypic and intergenotypic chimeras of HCV that contain the non-structural protein-encoding regions of JFH-1 and the structural protein-encoding regions of other HCV genomes may help define regions of structural proteins that influence the efficiency of virus particle synthesis and secretion [29]. This relatively new cell-culture model system will be invaluable in the study of many aspects of virus-host interaction, including viral entry, and assembly and release, which were previously inaccessible to manipulation.
The HCV Virion and Entry
The relatively low levels of HCV in plasma samples have hampered visualization of viral particles; however, virus-like particles have been identified by electron microscopy, which has indicated that infectious HCV virions are roughly spherical particles of diameter 55–65 nm with fine projections of approximately 6 nm ([25] and references therein). The major protein constituents of the host-derived lipid bilayer envelope are the highly glycosylated HCV envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2 that surround the viral nucleocapsid, composed of many copies of the HCV core protein and the genomic HCV RNA (Figure 1.3). HCV from serum and plasma fractionates with a wide range of buoyant densities that can be attributed to association of the virus with lipoproteins, in particular apolipoprotein-B (Apo-B) and apolipoprotein-E (Apo-E), which are components of host low density lipoprotein (LDL, Apo-B) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL, Apo-B, Apo-E) and suggest a close association with circulating LDL/VLDL [26]. The physiological association of HCV with LDL/VLDL remains unexplained mechanistically; however, it could be involved in viral uptake (see below), or alternatively the association of Apo-B with HCV virions may indicate a role for the hepatic LDL/VLDL secretory pathway in release of the virus.
Figure 1.3 The HCV particle. The RNA genome is encapsidated by the icosahedral nucleocapsid consisting of the core protein. The nucleocapsid is enveloped by a host-derived spherical lipid bilayer that is enriched with heterodimers of the envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2.
Hepatocytes are the main target for infection with HCV; however, identification of the cellular receptors responsible for HCV entry has proven difficult due to the lack of appropriate model systems. However, using a combination of HCV pseudotyped particles (HCVpp) [30,31] and cell-culture-derived HCV (HCVcc) [25], the complement of HCV receptors now seems complete.
The 25 kDa tetraspanin molecule CD81 and the human scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) both bind HCV E2 and are necessary but not sufficient for HCV entry [32]. For example, CD81 ectopic expression in hepatocyte-derived cell lines that are negative for CD81 confers susceptibility to HCVpp and HCVcc; however, expression of both factors in non-hepatocyte-derived cell lines does not concur infectivity [24,30]. Clearly additional hepatocyte factors are required for HCV entry. Using an interactive cloning and expression approach, the tight junction protein claudin-1 (CLDN1) was recently identified as an HCV co-receptor [33]. CLDN1 was found to be essential for entry into hepatic cells and rendered non-hepatic cells susceptible to infection. However, despite the identification of CD81, SR-B1, and CLDN1 as essential HCV entry co-factors, a number of human cell lines and those of non-primate origin remained resistant to HCV infection, suggesting an additional entry factor. Using a cyclic lentivirus-based screen of a cDNA library derived from a highly HCV-permissive hepatocarcinoma cell line (Huh-7.5) for genes that render the non-permissive CD81+, SR-BI+ 293T cell line infectable with HCVpp, the remaining crucial factor was recently identified as occludin (OCLN), also a tight junction protein [34]. Although expression of all four entry factors (CD81, SR-B1, CLDN1, OCLN) renders mouse cell lines susceptible to HCVpp infection, these cells could not support HCVcc infection. This is not surprising given past reports of inefficient replication of HCV RNA in mouse cell lines, and suggests that specific hepatocyte factors are crucial for efficient HCV replication. The identification of CD81 and OCLN as the minimal human-specific entry factors (HCV can bind to murine SR-B1 and CLDN1) not only significantly advances our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of HCV entry but also provides important steps for the development of a mouse model of HCV infection and provides an attractive target for the development of novel antiviral strategies.
Other molecules have been suggested to be involved in HCV entry. The association of HCV virions in serum with LDL and VLDL suggests that the LDL receptor (LDLR) may be an attractive candidate receptor. However, its precise role remains to be determined [26,35]. LDLR is not sufficient itself for entry and it does not bind directly to HCV E2 [30]. Together with the glycosaminoglycans, the LDLR in concert with other cell-surface proteins may serve to collect HCV at the cell surface and facilitate binding with receptors crucial for HCV entry. Consistent with this, a role has been proposed for L-SIGN and DC-SIGN in HCV attachment although they do not seem to mediate cell entry of HCV and their role is unclear [36].
The precise molecular events underlying HCV binding and entry are not well understood. However, HCV binding to the cell surface is thought to occur in a stepwise process by binding to several receptors followed by transfer to the tight junction proteins CLDN1 and OCLN that may facilitate cellular uptake (Figure 1.4). Similar to other flaviviruses, HCV entry is thought to be mediated by clathrin-mediated endocytosis with delivery of the nucleocapsid from the endosome in a pH-dependent manner [37,38,39]. Furthermore, the E1 and E2 proteins are class II fusion proteins that result from the production of a fusion pore in the endosome membrane that facilitates genome release to the cytoplasm [40].
Figure 1.4 Model for HCV entry. HCV particles associated with LDL and VLDL are thought to be tethered to the hepatocyte surface by the LDL-R and GAGs and subsequent stepwise interactions with CD81 and SR-B1. HCV is transferred to the tight junction proteins OCLN and CLDN-1 from where virus enters the cell by endocytosis. Release of the HCV core containing the RNA is mediated by fusion of the E1 and E2 proteins with the endosome. The relative roles and the spatial distributions of each of the HCV receptors remain to be determined.
HCV Replication
The HCV replication process is summarized in Figure 1.5. After translation of the HCV proteins from the positive-sense RNA genome by direct interaction of the host 40S ribosomal subunit with the IRES within the 5′ UTR of the genome, HCV replication begins. This IRES-directed translation is cap-independent and enables virus translation/replication to continue even after host cell cap-dependent translation has been shut down in response to viral infection.
Figure 1.5 Lifecycle of HCV. 1, Virus binding and internalization; 2, release of HCV RNA and translation of viral proteins; 3, association of HCV proteins in ER and formation of the replication complex in association with lipid droplets, replication of HCV RNA; 5, virion maturation and packaging of RNA; 6, release of virions.
Similar to other positive-stranded viruses, HCV is believed to replicate in association with intracellular membranes in a complex called the membranous web, although the exact details of this association are not well understood. It is thought that the association predominantly with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes may provide support for the organization of the replication complex, compartmentalization of the viral products, concentration of lipid constituents important for replication, and protection of the viral RNA from host-mediated innate immune defenses. This membranous web was first noticed in cultured cells harboring HCV replicons and contains detectable concentrations of the non-structural proteins NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B, and is very similar to sponge-like inclusions noted in liver tissue from HCV-infected chimpanzees [41--44]. Expression of NS4B alone induces the formation of the membranous web, and recent work has shown that membrane association is facilitated by amino acids 40 to 69 of the N-terminal region of NS4B [45].
The phosphorylation status of NS5A appears to be a determinant of HCV RNA replication with mutations that reduce hyperphosphorylation of NS5A dramatically enhancing HCV RNA replication [46,47]. In this manner, hyperphosphorylation of NS5A may induce a switch from genome replication to viral protein translation. NS5A also interacts with several host proteins that may be important in HCV replication through formation of the replication complex or facilitating assembly. NS5A interacts with the SNARE-like vesicle-associated membrane host proteins, VAP-A and VAP-B [48]. NS5A also interacts with geranylgeranylated F-box protein, FBL2, which is essential for replication and seems to be part of the replication complex [49]. How this interaction contributes to replication is unclear but it may help anchor the replicase complex to membranes. Its involvement in the replication process highlights the close interaction between HCV replication and the host cholesterol biosynthetic pathway [50]. Another host factor, cyclophilin B, has also been implicated in HCV replication through interaction with NS5B and stabilization of RNA binding, and was originally discovered through the ability of the powerful immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A (CsA) to inhibit HCV replication [51]. However, more recent work suggests that cyclophilin A plays a critical role in cleavage of NS5A/5B and assembly of the replication complex [52,53]. CsA analogs are currently being developed as antivirals against HCV [54].
The precise details of the HCV RNA replication process are still unclear but comparison with other flaviviruses suggests that the positive-stranded genome serves as a template for the synthesis of negative-strand RNA. Components of the membrane-bound replication complex associate with the 3′ end of the positive strand of the genome, with NS5B at the catalytic core, and initiate de novo synthesis of negative-strand RNA. These two strands remain base-paired, which results in the formation of a double-stranded RNA molecule that is copied multiple times by semiconservative replication by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) NS5B to generate multiple progeny, positive-strand viral RNA genomes. Importantly, the NS5B RdRp has no proofreading capacity and as such is error prone. This lack of proofreading ability results in the generation of many different but closely related genomes, often referred to as quasispecies. This genetic diversity is ideally suited to escape of immune control and is a significant factor in the generation of antiviral resistance to select antiviral agents. While a proportion of new positive-strand genomes serve as templates for viral protein translation, others associate with the core protein and form dimers within core-protein-enriched nucleocapsids. The association of the core protein with cytoplasmic lipid droplets has emerged as a critical determinant of nucleocapsid and infectious viral particle assembly. It is thought that the core uses this platform to recruit replication complexes and associated new genomes from closely associated ER-derived “lipid-droplet-associated membranes” in the assembly process [55,56]. Core particles may then become enveloped via budding through the ER where viral glycoproteins (E1/E2 heterodimers) become embedded. Little is known about the process of viral particle egress except that particles change in their biophysical properties (increased density) upon exit. Recent studies have indicated that the processes of HCV particle assembly, maturation, and secretion are dependent upon the machinery involved in the assembly and secretion of VLDL by hepatocytes [57].
The development and use of in vitro cell-culture model systems described above has been and continues to be fundamental in dissecting the stages of HCV replication and identification of viral-host interactions at the molecular level (Figure 1.5). While these studies are important for our understanding of HCV biology, they also provide specific targets for the development of novel therapeutics designed to completely eradicate HCV infection across all genotypes. Current therapies for HCV focus on modulation of the host immune response. However, with a greater understanding of HCV replication and host interactions, we are currently in a phase of developing therapeutics that directly target various stages of the HCV life cycle. Drugs targeting HCV entry and fusion, viral helicase, and polymerase or protease function are all under clinical investigation, with some showing exceptional promise. These targeted therapies when used in combination with the current therapeutic regime of Peg-IFN alfa-2 and ribavirin will provide the foundation for systemic eradication of HCV in infected persons. Furthermore, defining novel host factors essential for HCV replication and a greater understanding of the immunological correlates of immunity to HCV will provide the cornerstone for further development of novel therapeutics to combat HCV infection.
References
1. Moradpour D, Penin F, Rice CM. Replication of hepatitis C virus. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007;5(6):453–63.
2. Kieft JS, Zhou K, Jubin R, et al. The hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site adopts an ion-dependent tertiary fold. J Mol Biol 1999;292(3):513–29.
3. Psaridi L, Georgopoulou U, Varaklioti A, Mavromara P. Mutational analysis of a conserved tetraloop in the 5′ untranslated region of hepatitis C virus identifies a novel RNA element essential for the internal ribosome entry site function. FEBS Lett 1999;453(1–2):49–53.
4. Siridechadilok B, Fraser CS, Hall RJ, et al. Structural roles for human translation factor eIF3 in initiation of protein synthesis. Science 2005;310(5753):1513–15.
5. Spahn CM, Kieft JS, Grassucci RA, et al. Hepatitis C virus IRES RNA-induced changes in the conformation of the 40s ribosomal subunit. Science 2001;291(5510):1959–62.
6. Appel N, Schaller T, Penin F, Bartenschlager R. From structure to function: new insights into hepatitis C virus RNA replication. J Biol Chem 2006;281(15):9833–6.
7. Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, et al. Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific MicroRNA. Science 2005;309(5740):1577–81.
8. Sarasin-Filipowicz M, Krol J, Markiewicz I, et al. Decreased levels of microRNA miR-122 in individuals with hepatitis C responding poorly to interferon therapy. Nat Med 2009;15(1):31–3.
9. Henke JI, Goergen D, Zheng J, et al. MicroRNA-122 stimulates translation of hepatitis C virus RNA. EMBO J 2008;27(24):3300–10.
10. Blight KJ, Rice CM. Secondary structure determination of the conserved 98-base sequence at the 3′ terminus of hepatitis C virus genome RNA. J Virol 1997;71(10):7345–52.
11. Kolykhalov AA, Feinstone SM, Rice CM. Identification of a highly conserved sequence element at the 3′ terminus of hepatitis C virus genome RNA. J Virol 1996;70(6):3363–71.
12. Tanaka T, Kato N, Cho MJ, et al. Structure of the 3′ terminus of the hepatitis C virus genome. J Virol 1996;70(5):3307–12.
13. Yi M, Lemon SM. 3′ nontranslated RNA signals required for replication of hepatitis C virus RNA. J Virol 2003;77(6):3557–68.
14. Lohmann V, Korner F, Koch J, et al. Replication of subgenomic hepatitis C virus RNAs in a hepatoma cell line. Science 1999;285(5424):110–13.
15. Ikeda M, Yi M, Li K, Lemon SM. Selectable subgenomic and genome-length dicistronic RNAs derived from an infectious molecular clone of the HCV-N strain of hepatitis C virus replicate efficiently in cultured Huh7 cells. J Virol 2002;76(6):2997–3006.
16. Pietschmann T, Lohmann V, Kaul A, et al. Persistent and transient replication of full-length hepatitis C virus genomes in cell culture. J Virol 2002;76(8):4008–21.
17. Blight KJ, Kolykhalov AA, Rice CM. Efficient initiation of HCV RNA replication in cell culture. Science 2000;290(5498):1972–4.
18. Lohmann V, Korner F, Dobierzewska A, Bartenschlager R. Mutations in hepatitis C virus RNAs conferring cell culture adaptation. J Virol 2001;75(3):1437–49.
19. Bukh J, Pietschmann T, Lohmann V, et al. Mutations that permit efficient replication of hepatitis C virus RNA in Huh-7 cells prevent productive replication in chimpanzees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99(22):14416–21.
20. Kato T, Date T, Miyamoto M, et al. Nonhepatic cell lines HeLa and 293 support efficient replication of the hepatitis C virus genotype 2a subgenomic replicon. J Virol 2005;79(1):592–6.
21. Zhu Q, Guo JT, Seeger C. Replication of hepatitis C virus subgenomes in nonhepatic epithelial and mouse hepatoma cells. J Virol 2003;77(17):9204–10.
22. Blight KJ, McKeating JA, Rice CM. Highly permissive cell lines for subgenomic and genomic hepatitis C virus RNA replication. J Virol 2002;76(24):13001–14.
23. Foy E, Li K, Wang C, et al. Regulation of interferon regulatory factor-3 by the hepatitis C virus serine protease. Science 2003;300(5622):1145–8.
24. Lindenbach BD, Evans MJ, Syder AJ, et al. Complete replication of hepatitis C virus in cell culture. Science 2005;309(5734):623–6.
25. Wakita T, Pietschmann T, Kato T, et al. Production of infectious hepatitis C virus in tissue culture from a cloned viral genome. Nat Med 2005;11(7):791–6.
26. Nielsen SU, Bassendine MF, Burt AD, et al. Association between hepatitis C virus and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)/LDL analyzed in iodixanol density gradients. J Virol 2006;80(5):2418–28.
27. Kolykhalov AA, Agapov EV, Blight KJ, et al. Transmission of hepatitis C by intrahepatic inoculation with transcribed RNA. Science 1997;277(5325):570–74.
28. Yi M, Villanueva RA, Thomas DL, et al. Production of infectious genotype 1a hepatitis C virus (Hutchinson strain) in cultured human hepatoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(7):2310–15.
29. Pietschmann T, Kaul A, Koutsoudakis G, et al. Construction and characterization of infectious intragenotypic and intergenotypic hepatitis C virus chimeras. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(19):7408–13.
30. Bartosch B, Dubuisson J, Cosset FL. Infectious hepatitis C virus pseudo-particles containing functional E1-E2 envelope protein complexes. J Exp Med 2003;197(5):633–42.
31. Drummer HE, Maerz A, Poumbourios P. Cell surface expression of functional hepatitis C virus E1 and E2 glycoproteins. FEBS Lett 2003;546(2–3):385–90.
32. Pileri P, Uematsu Y, Campagnoli S, et al. Binding of hepatitis C virus to CD81. Science 1998;282(5390):938–41.
33. Evans MJ, von Hahn T, Tscherne DM, et al. Claudin-1 is a hepatitis C virus co-receptor required for a late step in entry. Nature 2007;446(7137):801–5.
34. Ploss A, Evans MJ, Gaysinskaya VA, et al. Human occludin is a hepatitis C virus entry factor required for infection of mouse cells. Nature 2009;457(7231):882–6.
35. Agnello V, Abel G, Elfahal M, et al. Hepatitis C virus and other flaviviridae viruses enter cells via low density lipoprotein receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96(22):12766–71.
36. Lozach PY, Amara A, Bartosch B, et al. C-type lectins L-SIGN and DC-SIGN capture and transmit infectious hepatitis C virus pseudotype particles. J Biol Chem 2004;279(31):32035–45.
37. Blanchard E, Belouzard S, Goueslain L, et al. Hepatitis C virus entry depends on clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Virol 2006;80(14):6964–72.
38. Koutsoudakis G, Kaul A, Steinmann E, et al. Characterization of the early steps of hepatitis C virus infection by using luciferase reporter viruses. J Virol 2006;80(11):5308–20.
39. Tscherne DM, Jones CT, Evans MJ, et al. Time- and temperature-dependent activation of hepatitis C virus for low-pH-triggered entry. J Virol 2006;80(4):1734–41.
40. Drummer HE, Poumbourios P. Hepatitis C virus glycoprotein E2 contains a membrane-proximal heptad repeat sequence that is essential for E1E2 glycoprotein heterodimerization and viral entry. J Biol Chem 2004;279(29):30066–72.
41. Egger D, Wolk B, Gosert R, et al. Expression of hepatitis C virus proteins induces distinct membrane alterations including a candidate viral replication complex. J Virol 2002;76(12):5974–84.
42. Gosert R, Egger D, Lohmann V, et al. Identification of the hepatitis C virus RNA replication complex in Huh-7 cells harboring subgenomic replicons. J Virol 2003;77(9):5487–92.
43. Moradpour D, Brass V, Bieck E, et al. Membrane association of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is essential for hepatitis C virus RNA replication. J Virol 2004;78(23):13278–84.
44. Moradpour D, Gosert R, Egger D, et al. Membrane association of hepatitis C virus nonstructural proteins and identification of the membrane alteration that harbors the viral replication complex. Antivir Res 2003;60(2):103–9.
45. Gouttenoire J, Montserret R, Kennel A, et al. An amphipathic {alpha}-helix at the C terminus of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 4B mediates membrane association. J Virol 2009;83(21):11378–84.
46. Appel N, Pietschmann T, Bartenschlager R. Mutational analysis of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A: potential role of differential phosphorylation in RNA replication and identification of a genetically flexible domain. J Virol 2005;79(5):3187–94.
47. Evans MJ, Rice CM, Goff SP. Phosphorylation of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A modulates its protein interactions and viral RNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101(35):13038–43.
48. Hamamoto I, Nishimura Y, Okamoto T, et al. Human VAP-B is involved in hepatitis C virus replication through interaction with NS5A and NS5B. J Virol 2005;79(21):13473–82.
49. Wang C, Gale M, Jr., Keller BC, et al. Identification of FBL2 as a geranylgeranylated cellular protein required for hepatitis C virus RNA replication. Mol Cell 2005;18(4):425–34.
50. Ye J, Wang C, Sumpter R, Jr., Brown MS, et al. Disruption of hepatitis C virus RNA replication through inhibition of host protein geranylgeranylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100(26):15865–70.
51. Watashi K, Ishii N, Hijikata M, et al. Cyclophilin B is a functional regulator of hepatitis C virus RNA polymerase. Mol Cell 2005;19(1):111–22.
52. Kaul A, Stauffer S, Berger C, et al. Essential role of cyclophilin A for hepatitis C virus replication and virus production and possible link to polyprotein cleavage kinetics. PLoS Pathog 2009;5(8):e1000546.
53. Liu Z, Yang F, Robotham JM, Tang H. Critical role of cyclophilin A and its prolyl-peptidyl isomerase activity in the structure and function of the hepatitis C virus replication complex. J Virol 2009;83(13):6554–65.
54. Flisiak R, Feinman SV, Jablkowski M, et al. The cyclophilin inhibitor Debio 025 combined with PEG IFNalpha2a significantly reduces viral load in treatment-naive hepatitis C patients. Hepatology 2009;49(5):1460–68.
55. Miyanari Y, Atsuzawa K, Usuda N, et al. The lipid droplet is an important organelle for hepatitis C virus production. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9(9):1089–97.
56. Shavinskaya A, Boulant S, Penin F, et al. The lipid droplet binding domain of hepatitis C virus core protein is a major determinant for efficient virus assembly. J Biol Chem 2007;282(51):37158–69.
57. Gastaminza P, Cheng G, Wieland S, et al. Cellular determinants of hepatitis C virus assembly, maturation, degradation, and secretion. J Virol 2008;82(5):2120–29.
2
Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes
Scott A. Read and Mark W. Douglas
Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia
Introduction
The hepatitis C virus (HCV) was cloned by Choo et al. in 1989 [1]. Like most RNA viruses, the genome exhibits a high degree of genetic variability. Thus, it soon became evident that a unified classification scheme was required and a consensus paper was published in 1994 [2]. This scheme identified 6 HCV genotypes and 11 subtypes, based on phylogenetic analysis of the NS5B region, and is still used today (Figure 2.1). More than 75 confirmed and provisional subtypes of HCV have now been identified, which are still grouped into 6 major genotypes (Table 2.1).
HCV genetic variability is seen at all levels of classification: between genotypes, within genotypes (subtypes), and within the infected individual (quasispecies). HCV genotypes differ from each other at the nucleotide level by over 30%; subtypes by 20–25%; and quasispecies by up to 10% [4,5]. This degree of polymorphism results from the error-prone viral RNA polymerase and many years of divergent evolution within different human populations. The resulting HCV genotypes have unique distributions, but all share similar gene arrangement, viral replication, and the ability to establish persistent infection. This chapter will focus on genetic differences among HCV genotypes and genotype-specific differences in disease pathogenesis and treatment response.
HCV Genotypes and Subtypes
Although HCV genotypes differ by up to one third overall, sequence divergence is not uniform across the genome. The most conserved region is the 5′ untranslated region (UTR), where RNA secondary structure forms the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) that initiates replication [6]. In contrast, the most diverse genes are for the envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2, which under immune pressure have evolved nine times faster than the 5′ UTR [7].
Each HCV genotype contains distinct subtypes, the geographic distributions of which reflect local social and medical practices, as well as host genetics. Contaminated blood products and needle sharing have allowed widespread dissemination of genotypes 1a, 1b, and 3a, which together account for over 80% of HCV infections worldwide [3]. Focal outbreaks have led to high local prevalence of certain subtypes, such as subtype 4a, which accounts for over 50% of HCV cases in Egypt. This followed mass parenteral antischistosomal therapy (PAT) administration in the latter half of the twentieth century [8]. In contrast, geographic isolation and/or inefficient sexual transmission routes in parts of South-East Asia have kept genotype 6 subtypes geographically restricted.
Figure 2.1 Evolutionary tree of the major subtypes of HCV. Subtypes can be differentiated by their distribution, risk groups and epidemiology. IDU, injecting drug user. Reproduced from [3], with permission from the Society for General Microbiology.
Intergenotypic Recombinants
With 3% of the world's population infected with an ever-increasing number of HCV genotypes and subtypes [9], the emergence of intergenotypic recombinants was virtually inevitable. During co-infection with multiple genotypes, subtypes, or strains of HCV, template switching can occur during replication, resulting in a recombinant virus containing two (or more) parental portions in its genome. This process is not site-specific and has been reported for the E1, E2, NS2, NS3, and NS5A genes [10,11,12,13]. Recently Sentandreu et al. estimated that intrasubtype recombination occurs in over 10% of HCV infected patients [11], but the rate of recombination between genotypes is probably much less, due to their divergent sequences.
Table 2.1 Defined HCV genotypes and their representative subtypes.
GenotypeAssigned subtypesa1a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m2a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r3a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, k, l4a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t5a6a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u7aa Bold indicates confirmed subtype designation demonstrated by the coding sequences of two or more variants that are epidemiologically independent. Source: http://hcv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/HCV/classification/genotable.htmlQuasispecies
The HCV RNA polymerase lacks proofreading ability, resulting in a high frequency of point mutations. The production of 1010 to 1012 new viral genomes per day [14], with a mutation rate of 1.5–2.0 ×10−3 sites per genome per year [15], results in a “swarm” of different HCV quasispecies in chronically infected individuals. Host immunity exerts the main selection pressure in vivo, resulting in mutants that replicate efficiently and evade the adaptive and innate immune responses. Genetic diversity is also thought to play a role in antiviral resistance as patients with higher pre-treatment quasispecies diversity are less likely to respond to interferon and ribavarin [16].
Genotype-Specific Effects of HCV Proteins on Response to Antiviral Therapy
The effectiveness of interferon-based therapy depends on HCV genotype [17]; less than 50% of patients with genotype 1 infection obtain a sustained virologic response (SVR) on current treatment regimens, compared to 75% or 80% with genotypes 2 and 3 [18,19]. Interactions have been observed between HCV E2, core, NS3/4A, and NS5A proteins and the innate immune system, so diversity among these proteins may influence treatment response.
The HCV E2 protein contains a 12 amino acid sequence that closely mimics the double-stranded RNA protein kinase (PKR) autophosphorylation site and translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) phosphorylation site, termed the PKR-eIF2a phosphorylation homology domain (PePHD) [20]. It has been suggested that the degree of E2-PKR homology may correlate with resistance to treatment [20], but other studies have produced conflicting results [21,22]. Larger studies are thus required.
Core protein has been shown in vitro to up-regulate suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3), a key negative regulator of the interferon-stimulated JAK-STAT signaling pathway [23]. Hepatic expression of SOCS3 is higher in patients who do not respond to interferon-based therapy [24] and SOCS3 levels are higher in genotype 1 infection than genotype 2, consistent with genotype-specific variations in treatment response [24].
The NS3/4A complex forms a viral protease that cleaves non-structural proteins from the HCV polyprotein [25]. NS3/4A also cleaves the signaling molecules TRIF and Cardif, ablating pattern recognition receptor (PRR) signaling from Toll-like receptor-3 (TLR3) and RIG-I, respectively [26,27]. Franco et al. compared NS3 protease activity between 12 HCV isolates and showed up to a six-fold variation, with the highest activity in genotype 1 isolates [28].
NS5A is the most promiscuous HCV protein, interacting with key components of metabolic, growth, and immune signaling cascades [29]. NS5A interacts with PKR to prevent autophosphorylation and subsequent eIF2 phosphorylation, in part via a 40 amino acid segment in the C-terminal domain called the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) [30]. Enomoto et al. showed that genotype 1b strains with mutations in this region responded better to treatment [31]. Reports vary [32,33], but a meta-analysis found a positive correlation between the number of ISDR mutations and response to therapy [34]. NS5A is a highly immunogenic protein, so Simmonds has proposed a balance between optimal function and immune evasion [3]. NS5A from genotype 2 and 3 isolates may be more immunogenic than genotypes 1 and 4, so under increased selection pressure it becomes less efficient at suppressing innate immunity, resulting in better treatment outcomes.
Elevated hepatic basal interferon-stimulated genes (ISG) expression is seen in patients who do not respond to interferon therapy, blunting their interferon response [17,35]. Interestingly, pre-treatment ISG levels are higher in genotype 1 and 4 infections than genotype 2 and 3, perhaps contributing to genotype-specific response rates [17].
Insulin Resistance
HCV genotype 1 and 4 infections are associated with insulin resistance [36,37], which reduces the response to interferon-based therapy [38], as discussed in Chapter 23 and reviewed recently [39]. Differential effects of genotypes 1 and 3 core on insulin signaling have been observed [40], and may partially explain genotype-specific differences in treatment response.
Steatosis
HCV affects lipid metabolism in a genotype-specific manner, with a strong association between genotype 3 and steatosis [41,42]. Genotype 3-associated steatosis appears to be a direct viral effect, as it occurs in the absence of other metabolic risk factors [43,44], correlates with increased viral load [41,45], and improves following successful antiviral therapy [46,47,48]. In contrast, patients infected with non-3 genotypes develop steatosis in association with HCV-induced insulin resistance and other metabolic abnormalities [45,49].
Conclusion
The HCV genome, although highly diverse overall, remains constrained by its host in many key areas. The error-prone RNA polymerase has allowed HCV to diversify among populations, resulting in various genotypes and subtypes, and to adapt quickly to an individual host through quasispecies diversity. Hypervariable regions in immunogenic proteins allow the virus to escape the host immune system, while regions essential for viral structure and replication remain conserved.
The complex interactions between HCV and its human host vary among genotypes, providing significant challenges for interferon-based therapies. A number of specific HCV polymerase and protease inhibitors are in phase III clinical trials, but they are rarely effective against all genotypes, and resistance emerges rapidly [50]. It is therefore likely that a multifaceted treatment approach is required to eradicate this virus, which has demonstrated the ability to securely embed itself within the liver interactome.
References
1. Choo QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, et al. Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science 1989;244(4902):359–62.
2. Simmonds P, Alberti A, Alter HJ, et al. A proposed system for the nomenclature of hepatitis C viral genotypes. Hepatology 1994;19(5):1321–4.
3. Simmonds P. Genetic diversity and evolution of hepatitis C virus – 15 years on. J Gen Virol 2004;85(Pt 11):3173–88.
4. Simmonds P, Holmes EC, Cha TA, et al. Classification of hepatitis C virus into six major genotypes and a series of subtypes by phylogenetic analysis of the NS-5 region. J Gen Virol 1993;74(Pt 11):2391–9.
5. Maggi F, Fornai C, Vatteroni ML, et al. Differences in hepatitis C virus quasispecies composition between liver, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and plasma. J Gen Virol 1997;78(Pt 7):1521–5.
6. Spahn CM, Kieft JS, Grassucci RA, et al. Hepatitis C virus IRES RNA-induced changes in the conformation of the 40s ribosomal subunit. Science 2001;291(5510):1959–62.
7. Salemi M, Vandamme AM. Hepatitis C virus evolutionary patterns studied through analysis of full-genome sequences. J Mol Evol 2002;54(1):62–70.
8. Frank C, Mohamed MK, Strickland GT, et al. The role of parenteral antischistosomal therapy in the spread of hepatitis C virus in Egypt. Lancet 2000;355(9207):887–91.
9. Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5(9):558–67.
10. Kageyama S, Agdamag DM, Alesna ET, et al. A natural inter-genotypic (2b/1b) recombinant of hepatitis C virus in the Philippines. J Med Virol 2006;78(11):1423–8.
11. Sentandreu V, Jimenez-Hernandez N, Torres-Puente M, et al. Evidence of recombination in intrapatient populations of hepatitis C virus. PLoS ONE 2008;3(9):e3239.
12. Kalinina O, Norder H, Mukomolov S, Magnius LO. A natural intergenotypic recombinant of hepatitis C virus identified in St. Petersburg. J Virol 2002;76(8):4034–43.
13. Legrand-Abravanel F, Claudinon J, Nicot F, et al. New natural intergenotypic (2/5) recombinant of hepatitis C virus. J Virol 2007;81(8):4357–62.
14. Neumann AU, Lam NP, Dahari H, et al. Hepatitis C viral dynamics in vivo and the antiviral efficacy of interferon-alpha therapy. Science 1998;282(5386):103–7.
15. Bukh J, Miller RH, Purcell RH. Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus: quasispecies and genotypes. Semin Liver Dis 1995;15(1):41–63.
16. Morishima C, Polyak SJ, Ray R, et al. Hepatitis C virus-specific immune responses and quasi-species variability at baseline are associated with nonresponse to antiviral therapy during advanced hepatitis C. J Infect Dis 2006;193(7):931–40.
17. Sarasin-Filipowicz M, Oakeley EJ, Duong FH, et al. Interferon signaling and treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(19):7034–9.
18. Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347(13):975–82.
19. Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H, Jr., Morgan TR, et al. Peginterferon-alpha2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann Intern Med 2004;140(5):346–55.
20. Taylor DR, Shi ST, Romano PR, et al. Inhibition of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR by HCV E2 protein. Science 1999;285(5424):107–10.
21. Munoz de Rueda P, Casado J, Paton R, et al. Mutations in E2-PePHD, NS5A-PKRBD, NS5A-ISDR, and NS5A-V3 of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and their relationships to pegylated interferon-ribavirin treatment responses. J Virol 2008;82(13):6644–53.
22. Ukai K, Ishigami M, Yoshioka K, et al. Mutations in carboxy-terminal part of E2 including PKR/eIF2alpha phosphorylation homology domain and interferon sensitivity determining region of nonstructural 5A of hepatitis C virus 1b: their correlation with response to interferon monotherapy and viral load. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12(23):3722–8.
23.
