Ancient Word, Changing Worlds E-Book

Stephen J. Nichols

• Herausgeber: Crossway
• Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
• Sprache: Englisch

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2009

Beschreibung

Belief in the Bible as God's authoritative revelation to humanity forms the bedrock of the Christian faith, laying the groundwork for nearly everything in the practice of theology. For the last 150 years or so, this doctrine has been put under the microscope of the modern age, with focused attention-and criticism-falling on three main subject areas: the authority of Scripture, the sufficiency of Scripture, and the interpretation of Scripture. Ancient Word, Changing Worlds tells the story of these developments in the doctrine of Scripture in the modern age, combining in one volume both narrative chapters and chapters devoted to primary source materials. This new genre of historical theology will appeal to general readers, who will be drawn in by the book's prose style, and students, who will benefit from features like timelines, charts, explanations of key terms, and introductions and explanatory notes for the primary source documents.

Leseprobe

Ancient Word, Changing Worlds

Copyright © 2009 by Stephen J. Nichols and Eric T. Brandt

Published by Crossway Books a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers 1300 Crescent Street Wheaton, Illinois 60187

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, except as provided by USA copyright law.

Cover design: Jon McGrath

Cover photo: iStock

First printing, 2009

Printed in the United States of America

Scripture quotations are taken from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible:English Standard Version®). Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles,a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission.All rights reserved.

PDF ISBN: 978-1-4335-0547-8

Mobipocket ISBN: 978-1-4335-0548-5

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-publication-data Nichols, Stephen J., 1970— Ancient Word, changing worlds : the doctrine of Scripture in amodern age / Stephen J. Nichols and Eric T. Brandt. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-4335-0260-6 (tpb). 1. Bible—Evidences, authority, etc. I. Brandt, Eric T., 1984– . II. Title.. BS480.N48   2009.

220.1—dc22

2008040948

VP    19  18  17  16  15  14  13  12  11  10  0915  14  13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  1

For Heidi

(SJN)

For Megan

(ETB)

Loving wives, cherished friends

Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction

1 Sacred Word in the Modern World: The Inspiration of Scripture

2 In Their Own Words: Select Documents on the Inspiration of Scripture

3 Battling for the Bible in the Modern World: The Inerrancy of Scripture

4 In Their Own Words: Select Documents on the Inerrancy of Scripture

5 Finding Meaning in the (Post-)Modern World: The Interpretation of Scripture

6 In Their Own Words: Select Documents on the Interpretation of Scripture

Glossary

Appendixes

1 Doctrinal Statements on Scripture

2 Key Biblical Texts on the Doctrine of Scripture

3 A Guide for Further Reading

Acknowledgments

Eric would like to thank Steve for suggesting that they write this book together. He is also grateful to his new bride, Megan, for her support and assistance with this project. He will not easily forget how gracious and encouraging she was as he wrote his last few pages on their honeymoon.

Steve would like to thank his colleagues and administrators at Lancaster Bible College for their commitment to the Word that endures forever. He is also grateful to his wife, Heidi, for reading through his chapters. They are much better off for it.

We are grateful to Lester Hicks, who read an early version of the manuscript and made many helpful observations. Ted Griffin at Crossway once again proved to be a most observant and kind editor. And finally, we are grateful to Al Fisher for both a new and a seasoned friendship.

We dedicate this book to our wives, without whom this book wouldn’t have been written.

Introduction

Mark Twain, as only he could, once said, “It is full of interest. It has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood-drenched history; and some good morals; and a wealth of obscenity; and upwards of a thousand lies.”1 Of course, you have figured out that he was speaking of the Bible, otherwise referred to as the Good Book. That book has had its defenders and detractors, champions and critics, friends and foes. Perhaps in no time has the Bible been more a subject of controversy, however, than in the modern age, this age of Mark Twain and of the rise of modern science and of rapid and cataclysmic change.

It seems that each age of the church has its unique challenges and opportunities. The early church faced the crisis of persecution and the crises of the heretics who challenged the biblical teaching on, among other things, Christ. The medieval church wrestled with the union of church and empire. The church in the era of the Reformation not only had to withstand the religious and political establishment but also had to reconstruct the church itself, from the platform planks of significant doctrines all the way to the structure of the church service. The church in the “modern age,” a rather ambiguous descriptor, also faces unique challenges and opportunities. Perhaps chief among them is the role of the supernatural in light of the ascendancy of naturalistic and scientific worldviews. To put the matter differently, what does an ancient book, the supernatural revelation from God contained in the pages of Scripture, have to say to an increasingly complex and changing modern world? How does an ancient word speak to our changing world?

In the past eras of the church, various theologians and church leaders rose to the occasion of the challenges facing the church, leading the church into deeper reflection on Scripture and clearer expression of theology and worship. The Christological heresies of the early church yielded the treasures of the Nicene and Chalcedonian Creeds. The Reformation’s recovery of both Scripture and the apostolic teaching produced the Reformation solas of sola scriptura (Scripture alone), sola fide and sola gratia (salvation and justification by faith alone and by grace alone), solus Christus (Christ alone), and soli Deo gloria (for the glory of God alone). And so it is in the modern age. The challenge to supernatural revelation, the challenge to the Bible, has been met with deeper reflection on and clearer expression of the doctrines of Scripture. These doctrines orbit around three words, words that have received a great deal of attention in the nineteenth, twentieth, and now into the twenty-first centuries. These three words are inspiration, inerrancy, and interpretation. This book tells the story of these words, and particularly the story of how these words were developed in these last few centuries. It is the story of how the ancient word of God speaks to and in our changing world.

Chapter 1 begins with the first of these words, inspiration, the doctrine that stresses the divine origin of Scripture. Religious writings claim to be the words of the divine. The Bible is not unique in laying forth such a claim. But the Bible claims not simply to be another revelation by another deity. The Bible claims to be the true and authentic word of the one and only Triune God. This claim is out of step with the modern world on two counts. First, it’s a claim to the reality and reliability of the supernatural. Secondly, it’s an exclusive claim. The first claim is out of step with a naturalistic worldview, while the second is out of step with a pluralistic world-view. Yet, the doctrine of inspiration is foundational to the Christian view of revelation. And since Christians endeavor to build their faith and practice upon Scripture, the doctrine of inspiration arguably plays a central role in all doctrine.

Closely related to the doctrine of inspiration comes the second word this book treats, inerrancy. B. B. Warfield, one of the figures who casts a long shadow over this discussion, made the connection to inspiration and inerrancy by simply claiming that if Scripture is inspired, of divine origin, then it follows that it is authoritative, reliable, and true, which is to say inerrant. Now the debate, especially as the twentieth century goes, really heats up. As one book title has it, we have embarked on The Battle for the Bible. Is the Bible true? Is it accurate? These questions are fundamental to the Christian faith and the Christian claims.

Just as you cannot speak of the Bible without addressing inspiration and inerrancy, one more word merits attention, interpretation. Like inspiration and inerrancy, this word too has drawn a great deal of attention in recent decades. Developments in the fields of linguistics and literary criticism have had quite a ripple effect on biblical interpretation. In some ways, the ascendancy of these fields of linguistics and literary criticism stands behind this new age we have entered into culturally, the postmodern era. Many of the prominent and founding voices of postmodernism, such as Jacques Derrida and Jean-François Lyotard, were primarily literary scholars. These developments and these figures have changed the nature of the discussion of how individuals and communities understand and relate to texts. Interpretation of the biblical text is not immune from these developments. As can be expected, not a little debate has emerged over these developments in the field of biblical interpretation. Indeed, if every age of the church has its unique challenges and opportunities, it does seem that in the modern age, and now in the postmodern age as well, the doctrine of Scripture has been on center stage.

This book looks at each of these words. Chapter 1 relays the narrative of the development of the doctrine of inspiration, chapter 3 treats inerrancy, and chapter 5 explores interpretation. These narrative chapters are complemented by chapters 2, 4, and 6, which provide readings in the primary source documents. These readings present the voices of the major figures in these debates, allowing these figures to speak for themselves. These readings also provide succinct summaries, pointing readers, should you want more, to a whole wealth of material. This book covers roughly a 150-year history, from the 1850s right up until this first decade of the twenty-first century. Of course, these three words—inspiration, inerrancy, and interpretation—continue to garner much interest and are the subject of no little controversy, in days past and recent.

The Bible has a rich history in the modern world. Copies are given away at weddings and births and placed in hotel room nightstands. Hands are placed on it for the taking of oaths. And, as many country songs point out, it is almost ubiquitously regarded as the Good Book. But the Bible also faces its share of attacks and criticism. In the face of those attacks, many biblical scholars and theologians have taken up the challenge of defending and commending the Bible. They have labored to show that an ancient book does indeed have something to say to modern and even postmodern people. This book seeks to tell that story.

1Mark Twain, Letters from the Earth: Uncensored Writings (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2004), 14.

1: Sacred Word in the Modern World: The Inspiration of Scripture

We believers in the full inspiration of the Bible do not merely admit that. We insist upon it.

J . GRESHAM MACHEN

I’ve often thought the Bible should have a disclaimer in the front saying this is fiction.

IAN MCKELLAN

No less than the famed “Lion of Princeton,” B. B. Warfield, nearly built a whole career on two words: inspiration and inerrancy. And from the late nineteenth on into the twentieth centuries, these were fighting words. Some have claimed that Warfield spent so much time with these words because he was a contentious man, that he was always up for a good fight. This portrayal has Warfield on the prowl for some argument that he could win, scouring for some controversy through which he could showcase his theological talents. No doubt, Warfield could handle himself, he could win arguments, and he had plenty of theological ability and mettle to display if he wanted to. But he took up this challenge not because he was a pugilist by nature and not because he belonged to some theological persuasion that relished controversy. Instead, if we take him at his word, he engaged the discussion over these words because they are so crucial to Christianity. Warfield indeed fought for these doctrines, but he fought for them because he knew how important they are to the “doctrine and duty,” the thought and practice, of the church.