139,99 €
This book discusses the media, beliefs, the news, the Internet, etc. but it should not be seen as yet another critique of the media system, exploring with indignant fascination the idea of a machination against truth set up to serve a society of domination. These kinds of theories, whether they pertain to conspiracy theories or, more subtly, to a self-styled "critical" way of thinking, have always seemed to be the expression of a form of intellectual puerility. This is not to say that attempts at manipulating opinions do not occur, or that our world is free from compromised principles, or indeed corruption; far from it, but none of this is the key issue.
In fact, reality can somehow be even more unsettling than those myths, however sophisticated they may be, that envisage the media system hand-in-hand with industry, science, and so forth, all in agreement so as to lead the "people" away from the truth. It is more unsettling because the processes described in this book and that allow falsehood and dubiousness to take hold of the public sphere are boosted by the development of IT, the workings of our minds, and the very nature of democracy. And finally, it is more unsettling because we are all responsible for what is going to happen to us.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 268
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015
Cover
Title
Copyright
Preface
Introduction
1 More is Less: Mental Avarice and Mass Information
1.1. The revolution of the cognitive market
1.2. Amplification of the confirmation bias
1.3. The Seattle affair
1.4. The theorem of information credulity
1.5. Filter bubbles
2 Why Does the Internet Side with Dubious Ideas?
2.1. The utopia of the knowledge society and the empire of beliefs
2.2. The ditherer’s problem
2.3. Competition between belief and knowledge on the Internet
2.4. Psychokinesis
2.5. The Loch Ness Monster
2.6. Aspartame
2.7. Crop circles
2.8. Astrology
2.9. Overview of resutls
2.10. How can we explain these results?
2.11. The Titanic syndrome
2.12. When Olson’s paradox plays against knowledge
2.13. Charles Fort, his life, and his works in a few words
2.14. Fort products: argumentative mille-feuilles
2.15. The sharing of the arguments of conviction
2.16. A Fortean product in the making: Michael Jackson’s fake death
2.17. When Fort reinforces Olson
2.18. Would you believe it!
2.19. It is all in the Bible, all of it
2.20. The transparency paradox
2.21. A shorter incubation period
3 Competition Serves the Truth, Excessive Competition Harms It
3.1. Michael Jackson’s son, abused by Nicolas Sarkozy
3.2. A “prisoner’s dilemma” kind of situation
3.3. Presidential unfaithfulness and the burnt Koran
3.4. The IRC curve (information reliability/competition)
4 What Can Be Done? From the Democracy of the Gullible to the Democracy of Enlightenment
4.1. The hope of the astrophysicist
4.2. The bad education
4.3. When gullibility looks like intelligence
4.4. The sum of imperfections
4.5. Toward cognitive demagogy
4.6. How to keep the illusion scholar inside us in check
4.7. Declaration of mental independence
4.8. The fourth power
4.9. A new form of scientific communication
4.10. A new militancy
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
End User License Agreement
1 More is Less: Mental Avarice and Mass Information
Figure 1.1.
Number of Internet users (in millions) across the globe
2 Why Does the Internet Side with Dubious Ideas?
Figure 2.1.
The devil shape and the 9/11 attacks
Figure 2.2.
Searches on Google for the words “Haiti earthquake” (dotted) and “HAARP”
Figure 2.3.
Conspiracy-related arguments after the Charlie Hebdo attacks
3 Competition Serves the Truth, Excessive Competition Harms It
Figure 3.1.
Degree of competition
4 What Can Be Done? From the Democracy of the Gullible to the Democracy of Enlightenment
Figure 4.1.
Curve of subjective probabilities
1 More is Less: Mental Avarice and Mass Information
Table 1.1.
Number of websites dedicated to conspiracy theories out of the first 30 results given by Google
2 Why Does the Internet Side with Dubious Ideas?
Table 2.1.
Orientation of the first 30 websites displayed by Google in relation to the topic of psychokinesis
Table 2.2.
Orientation of the first 30 websites displayed by Google in relation to the topic of the Loch Ness Monster
Table 2.3.
Orientation of the first 30 websites displayed by Google in relation to the topic of the health hazard posed by aspartame
Table 2.4.
Orientation of the first 30 websites displayed by Google in relation to the topic of crop circles
.
Table 2.5.
Orientation of the first 30 websites displayed by Google in relation to the topic of astrology
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Cover
Contents
iii
iv
vii
ix
x
xi
xii
xiii
xv
xvi
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
109
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
Gérald Bronner
FOCUS SERIES
Series Editor Jean-Charles Pomerol
First published in the English language 2016 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
First published in the French language by Presses Universitaires de France, from pages 3–146 and 275–325 (of the French Edition) © La démocratie des crédules, Presses Universitaires de France, 2013.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address:
ISTE Ltd 27-37 St George’s Road London SW19 4EU UK
www.iste.co.uk
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA
www.wiley.com
© ISTE Ltd 2016 The rights of Gérald Bronner to be identified as the author of this work have been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2015954428
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISSN 2051-2481 (Print) ISSN 2051-249X (Online) ISBN 978-1-84821-916-8
This book will mention the media, beliefs, the news, the Internet, etc. but it should not be seen as yet another critique of the media system, exploring with indignant fascination the idea of a machination against truth set up to serve a society of domination. These kinds of theories, whether they pertain to conspiracy theories or, more subtly, to a self-styled “critical” way of thinking, have always seemed to me the expression of a form of intellectual puerility. This is not to say that attempts at manipulating opinions do not occur, or that our world is free from compromised principles, or indeed corruption; far from it, but none of this is the key issue.
In fact, reality somehow strikes me as even more unsettling than those myths, however sophisticated they might be, which envisage the media system hand-in-hand with industry, science and so forth, all in agreement to lead the “people” away from the truth. This is more unsettling, because the processes that will be described in this book and that allow falsehood and dubiousness to take hold of the public sphere are boosted by the development of IT, the workings of our mind, and the very nature of democracy… It is more unsettling then because we are all responsible for what is going to happen to us.
On December 19th, 2011, I received an email from one of the coordinators of the Reopen-09/11 website, who claims that the official version of the 9/11 attacks, the one maintaining that those murderous acts were fomented by Al-Qaeda, is questionable. If he wrote to me, it is due to the fact that, on several occasions, I have had the opportunity to show in newspapers, on the radio and even on television, how the mechanisms of belief we call conspiracy theories were at work. As it happens, I have sometimes taken as an example those individuals believing that these attacks have been organized by the CIA. There would be many things to say about that very polite email, if only about this apparently innocent and very sensible question he asked me: “Don’t you think that an independent investigation would once and for all allow those who believe the accredited version and those who are in doubt to come to an agreement?” This question suggested that the official report [NAT 04] had been written by dubious experts and it gave the impression, as often happens when an “independent” assessment is required, that my interlocutor wouldn’t be satisfied unless that assessment eventually yielded a report that would substantiate his theories. It so happened that what mostly drew my attention was the heading of his email: “right to doubt”, which indicated that its sender felt one of his basic rights had been scoffed at.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!