94,99 €
A unique, multi-discipline, developmental approach to childhood psychopathology
Child and Adolescent Psychopathology is the only comprehensive text in the field to address genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors within a developmental context. Based on cutting-edge research and aligned with the DSM-5, this book emphasizes how, when, and why disorders emerge among young people, and the ways in which symptom profiles change at different stages of development. This new third edition has been updated to include new chapters on OCD and trauma disorders consistent with DSM-5 classification, and includes new discussion on epigenetics and the neighborhood effects on the development of delinquency. Coverage includes extensive discussion of risk factors, from disturbed attachment relations and abuse/neglect, to head injury and teratogen exposure, followed by in-depth examination of behavior disorders and psychological disorders including Autism Spectrum, Schizophrenia Spectrum, and Eating Disorders.
Psychological disorders in children are increasingly being explored from a relational perspective, and continuous advances in neurobiology research are adding an additional dimension to our understanding of cause, effect, and appropriate intervention. This book provides detailed guidance toward all aspects of childhood psychopathology, with a multi-discipline approach and a unique developmental emphasis.
As the field of child psychology continues to evolve, behavioral and psychological disorders move beyond a list of symptoms to encompass the 'whole child'—biology, chemistry, environment, and culture are becoming increasingly relevant in understanding and treating these disorders, and must be considered from the earliest assessment stages. Child and Adolescent Psychopathology provides comprehensive information on childhood disorders from a developmental perspective.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1991
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2016
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Foreword
Preface
List of Contributors
PART I: THE DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING MENTAL ILLNESS
Chapter 1: Developmental Psychopathology as a Scientific Discipline: A 21st-Century Perspective
Relevance And Importance
Principles of DP
Summary
Chapter Contents
References
Chapter 2: Classifying Psychopathology: The DSM, Empirically Based Taxonomies, and the Research Domain Criteria
Historical Context
The
DSM
and Developmental Psychopathology
Empirically Derived Classification Systems
The Research Domain Criteria
Conclusions
References
Chapter 3: Genetic, Environmental, and Epigenetic Influences on Behavior
Historical Context
The Developmental Psychopathology Perspective
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Psychiatric Genetics
Gene-Environment Interdependence
Epigenesis
Genetics of Comorbidity
Genetics of Continuity
Summary and Conclusions
References
PART II: VULNERABILITIES AND RISK FACTORS FOR PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
Chapter 4: Risk and Resilience in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Historical Context
Contemporary Terminological And Conceptual Issues
Unifying Concepts for Understanding Risk and Resilience: Current Perspectives on Stress, Coping, and Emotion Regulation
Risk and Resilience: Children of Depressed Parents
Conclusions
References
Chapter 5: Child Maltreatment and Risk for Psychopathology
Epidemiology of Abuse and Neglect
Maltreatment and Children's Risk For Psychopathology
Is the Association Between Maltreatment and Psychopathology Causal?
Etiological Formulations
Moderators of Child Maltreatment
Conclusions
References
Chapter 6: Impulsivity and Vulnerability to Psychopathology
Historical Context
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Etiological Formulations
Genetics and Heritability
Impulsivity and Vulnerability to Psychopathology
Research Domain Criteria Framework
Synthesis and Future Directions
References
Chapter 7: High-Reactive Temperament, Behavioral Inhibition, and Vulnerability to Psychopathology
Historical Context
Diagnostic Issues
The Etiological Role of Temperaments
High- and Low-Risk Infants: Developmental Progression
Synthesis
References
Chapter 8: The Adaptive Calibration Model of Stress Responsivity: Concepts, Findings, and Implications for Developmental Psychopathology
Historical Context
Conditional Adaptation and Maladaptation
Functions of the Stress Response System
Environmental Information
Patterns of Responsivity
Adaptive Calibration and the Allostatic Load Model
Conclusion
References
Chapter 9: Exposure to Teratogens as a Risk Factor for Psychopathology
Introduction and Etiological Formulations
Historical Context
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Mental Health Outcomes in FASD
Psychopathology Related to Other Prenatal Exposures
Conclusions
Risk and Protective Factors
Synthesis and Future Directions
References
Chapter 10: Brain Injury and Vulnerability to Psychopathology
Historical Context
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Prevalence
Etiological Formulations
Developmental Considerations
Brain Injury and the Frontal Lobes
Clinical Considerations
Summary and Conclusions
References
Chapter 11: Emotion Dysregulation as a Vulnerability to Psychopathology
Historical Context
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Emotion Dysregulation From a Clinical Perspective
Etiological Formulations
Heritability of Emotion Dysregulation
Summary and Conclusions
References
Chapter 12: Neighborhood Effects on the Development of Delinquency
Historical Context
Etiology
Developmental Progression
Sex Differences
Cultural Considerations
Summary and Conclusions
References
PART III: EXTERNALIZING DISORDERS
Chapter 13: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Historical Context
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Diagnostic Issues and
DSM
Criteria
Prevalence
Risk Factors and Etiological Formulations
Developmental Progression
Comorbidity
Sex Differences
Cultural Considerations
Protective Factors
Theoretical Synthesis
Summary and Conclusions
References
Chapter 14: Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Conduct Disorder, and Juvenile Delinquency
Introduction
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Comorbidity
Considering Development and Sex Differences
Prevalence and Age of Onset
Adolescent and Adult Outcomes of Childhood ODD and CD
Vulnerabilities to and Risk Factors for Conduct Problems
Neural Mechanisms
Theoretical Synthesis
Unresolved Questions and Future Directions
Validity of Diagnostic Subtypes of CD
References
Chapter 15: Substance Use Disorders
Introduction
Prevalence of Alcohol and Other Drug Use
DSM-5
Criteria and Diagnostic Issues
Historical Context and Etiological Formulations
Environmental Risk Factors and Genetic Vulnerabilities
Developmental Pathways to Abuse and Dependence
Effects of Adolescent Alcohol Use on Brain Development
Summary and Conclusions
References
PART IV: INTERNALIZING DISORDERS
Chapter 16: Anxiety Disorders
Historical Context
Diagnostic Issues and
DSM-5
Criteria
Prevalence
Etiology
Developmental Progression
Comorbidities
Cultural Considerations
Sex Differences
Research Domain Criteria
Summary and Conclusions
References
Chapter 17: Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Introduction
Historical Context
DSM-5
Criteria and Diagnostic Issues
Prevalence
Developmental Progression
Sex Differences
Comorbidities
Cultural Considerations
Etiology
Neuropsychological Functioning
Research Domain Criteria
Summary and Conclusions
References
Chapter 18: Depressive Disorders
Introduction
Historical Context
Prevalence
Developmental Progression and Comorbidity
Sex Differences
Etiology
Cultural Considerations
Research Domain Criteria
Synthesis and Future Directions
References
Chapter 19: The Development of Borderline Personality and Self-Inflicted Injury
Introduction
Historical Context
Diagnostic, Terminological, and Conceptual Issues
Etiological Formulations
Familiality and Heritability
Genetics and Neurotransmitter Dysfunction
Contextual and Family Risk Factors
Summary and Conclusions
References
PART V: OTHER DISORDERS
Chapter 20: Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders in Infants, Children, and Adolescents
Historical Context
Etiology
Diagnostic Issues and
DSM-5
Criteria
Prevalence
Research Domain Criteria
Synthesis and Future Directions
References
Chapter 21: Bipolar Disorder
Historical Context
Episodes
Specific Bipolar Disorder Diagnoses
Problems With Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder Among Youth
Prevalence
Etiology
Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology
Sex Differences
Comorbidities
Cultural Considerations
Research Domain Criteria
Theoretical Synthesis and Future Directions
References
Chapter 22: Autism Spectrum Disorder
Historical Context
Terminological and Conceptual Issues
Prevalence
Etiologic Formulations
Developmental Progression
Protective Factors
Synthesis and Future Directions
References
Chapter 23: Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia
Historical Context
Diagnostic Issues and
DSM-5
Criteria
Differential Diagnostic Issues
Prevalence
Sex Differences
Comorbidity
Overlap Between Autism and COS
Risk Factors
Insights into Pathophysiology
Theoretical Synthesis and Future Directions
Continuity Between COS and Adult-Onset Schizophrenia
References
Chapter 24: Eating Disorders
Historical Context
Diagnostic Issues and
DSM-5
Criteria
Prevalence
Risk Factors, Protective Factors, and Etiologic Formulations
Developmental Progression
Comorbidity
Sex Differences
Cultural Considerations
Synthesis and Future Directions
References
About the Authors
Theodore P. Beauchaine
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Author Index
Subject Index
End User License Agreement
iii
iv
ix
x
xi
xiii
xiv
xv
xvii
xviii
xix
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
111
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
405
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
681
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Chapter 2: Classifying Psychopathology: The DSM, Empirically Based Taxonomies, and the Research Domain Criteria
Figure 2.1 A simplified depiction of the hierarchical latent structure of psychopathology.
Chapter 3: Genetic, Environmental, and Epigenetic Influences on Behavior
Figure 3.1 The general latent structure of psychopathology, as determined by twin, adoption, and population-based studies.
Figure 3.2 The bifactor structure of psychopathology, including a superordinate general vulnerability factor (see Caspi et al., 2014; Lahey et al., 2011; Lahey et al., 2012).
Chapter 8: The Adaptive Calibration Model of Stress Responsivity: Concepts, Findings, and Implications for Developmental Psychopathology
Figure 8.1 Predicted curvilinear relation between developmental context and optimal levels of stress responsivity.
Chapter 13: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Figure 13.1 Patterns of comorbidity in the MTA study (A 14-month randomized clinical trial, 1999).
Chapter 19: The Development of Borderline Personality and Self-Inflicted Injury
Figure 19.1 Biosocial developmental model of BPD and SII.
Chapter 22: Autism Spectrum Disorder
Figure 22.1 Experience-based risk processes in autism.
Chapter 8: The Adaptive Calibration Model of Stress Responsivity: Concepts, Findings, and Implications for Developmental Psychopathology
Table 8.1 Comparison of Adaptive Calibration Model (ACM) and Allostatic Load Model (ALM)
Chapter 13: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Table 13.1 Summary of Brain Imaging Findings in ADHD
Table 13.2 Summary of Neuropsychological Findings in ADHD
Edited by
Theodore P. Beauchaine
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Copyright © 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
Published simultaneously in Canada.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Readers should be aware that Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If legal, accounting, medical, psychological or any other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
For general information on our other products and services, please contact our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.
Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Beauchaine, Theodore P., editor. | Hinshaw, Stephen P., editor.
Title: Child and adolescent psychopathology / edited By Theodore P. Beauchaine, Stephen P. Hinshaw.
Description: Third edition. | Hoboken, N.J. : John Wiley & Sons Inc., [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016026246 | ISBN 9781119169956 (cloth) | ISBN 9781119169963 (epdf) | ISBN 9781119169970 (epub)
Subjects: LCSH: Child psychopathology. | Adolescent psychopathology.
Classification: LCC RJ499 .C48237 2016 | DDC 618.92/89—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016026246
THIRD EDITION
The remarkable third edition of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology represents an academic tour de force presenting the science of development associated with progressions to mental disorder. These processes are typically multiple and interacting. Indeed, their importance is clear, as neurodevelopmental models of psychopathology are dominant today. Sadly, both stigmatization—primarily from profound misunderstanding of mental disorders—and low economic status remain barriers to research and treatment (Martinez & Hinshaw, 2016; Merikangas et al., 2011).
The chapters show remarkable breadth, including the challenge of integrating genetics, brain imaging, brain trauma, and prenatal and physiological as well as environmental variables in a clinically meaningful way. Clinicians have already benefitted from studies detailing patterns of continuity and discontinuity. Indeed, such investigations can help to prevent premature prediction and labeling that in itself may be harmful. These models, as well as the transactional nature of many dysfunctional behaviors, preclude simplistic causal pathways.
Brain imaging has yet to contribute to clinical diagnosis and care, even though longitudinal and large-sample cross-sectional studies are starting to indicate subpopulation developmental brain phenotypes that have integrative potential for developmental psychopathology (Giedd et al., 2015; Gur, 2016). For example, it is possible that different developmental trajectories in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder reflect alternate clinical forms, as delayed cortical developmental may well relate to greater improvement in adolescence (Shaw et al., 2013).
In our sister science of developmental neurobiology, true “clinical breakthroughs” have emerged, such as the use of rapamycin for tuberous sclerosis (Franz et al., 2006), and magnesium infusion for prevention of cerebral palsy (Rouse et al., 2008). These are large-effect-size interventions of interest to child psychiatrists because of associated psychopathologies in these conditions. Both were serendipitous discoveries, which by definition cannot be planned. At the same time, it remains troubling how much risk remains embedded in political arenas of community infrastructure (e.g., support for schools, housing, and law enforcement). We must transcend psychobiology to incorporate multiple levels of analysis, as amply shown in the following chapters.
The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC; Cuthbert, 2014), highlighted in a number of chapters, do not represent a truly new approach. Dimensional as well as categorical measures have been hallmarks of NIH-funded psychiatric research for decades (Weinberger, Glick, & Klein, 2015), and neurobiologically founded, multiple-levels-of analysis research has contributed to key advances in our understanding of etiology since at least the mid-20th century (Beauchaine & Thayer, 2015). Evidence is mounting for age- and category-related interactions with dimensional brain MRI measures (e.g., Wiggins et al., 2016). In all, the RDoC provides a useful and surprisingly interactive set of measures.
Finally, I found inspiration in the several authors who reviewed the predictive and possible treatment implications of regulatory physiological measures for developmental psychopathology. Ultimately, these models will be judged on when and how these regulatory processes can be changed, given the complexity of initial measurements and the potential for highly individualized treatment plans. One might read this entire volume as a basis for future personalized therapies, paralleling the present movement in medicine. In all, the chapters herald considerable promise for the future.
Judith L. Rapoport, MDChief, Child Psychiatry BranchNational Institute of Mental Health10 Center Drive Building 10, Room 3 N202Bethesda, MD 20892-1600
Beauchaine, T. P., & Thayer, J. F. (2015). Heart rate variability as a transdiagnostic biomarker of psychopathology.
International Journal of Psychophysiology
, 98, 338–350.
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014). The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology.
World Psychiatry
, 13, 28–35.
Franz, D. N., Leonard, J., Tudor, C., Chuck, G., Care, M., Sethuraman, G.,…Crone, K. R. (2006). Rapamycin causes regression of astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis complex.
Annals of Neurology
, 59, 490–498.
Giedd, J. N., Raznahan, A., Alexander-Bloch, A., Schmitt, E., Gogtay, N., & Rapoport, J. L. (2015). Child psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health longitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging study of human brain development.
Neuropsychopharmacology
, 40, 43–49.
Gur, R. C. (2016). Prospective community studies linking cognitive deficits to subclinical symptoms and a step toward precision medicine.
JAMA Psychiatry
, 73, 109–110.
Martinez, A., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2016). Mental health stigma: Theory, developmental issues, and research priorities. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.),
Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 4. Risk, resilience, and intervention
(3rd ed., pp. 997–1039). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Merikangas, K. R., He, J. P., Burstein, M., Swendsen, J., Avenevoli, S., Case, B.,…Olfson, M. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A).
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
, 50, 32–45.
Rouse, D. J., Hirtz, D. G., Thom, E., Varner, M. W., Spong, C. Y., Mercer, B. M.,…Roberts, J. M. (2008). A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy.
New England Journal of Medicine
, 359, 895–905.
Shaw, P., Malek, M., Watson, B., Greenstein, D., de Rossi, P., & Sharp, W. (2013). Trajectories of cerebral cortical development in childhood and adolescence and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Biological Psychiatry
, 74, 599–606.
Weinberger, D. R., Glick, I. D., & Klein, D. F. (2015). Whither Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)?: The good, the bad, and the ugly.
JAMA Psychiatry
, 72, 1161–1162.
Wiggins, J. L., Brotman, M. A., Adleman, N. E., Kim, P., Oakes, A. H., Reynolds, R. C.,…Leibenluft, E. (2016). Neural correlates of irritability in disruptive mood dysregulation and bipolar disorders.
American Journal of Psychiatry
. Epub ahead of print.
As we noted in the preface of the second edition of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (Beauchaine & Hinshaw, 2013), global costs of mental illness—in terms of morbidity, mortality, and other forms of human suffering—are staggering. In many developed countries including the United States, over one third of individuals suffer from a major psychiatric disorder at some point in their lives (Kessler et al., 2009). In low- and middle-income countries, mental disorders account for 25% and 34%, respectively, of total years lived with disability, yet most of those affected receive no treatment (WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium, 2004). Although treatment rates are slightly higher in wealthy countries, mental disorders continue to carry significant stigma. As a result, many avoid seeking help, and a lack of treatment parity remains for mental disorders vs. other health-related conditions (Hinshaw, 2007; Martinez & Hinshaw, 2016).
When the two of us met nearly 18 years ago, knowledge of the causes of mental illnesses was quite limited compared to today. Although behavioral genetics studies had shown that most psychiatric disorders are at least moderately heritable, little was known about molecular genetic, neural, or hormonal mechanisms of heritability. Moreover, neither epigenetic alterations in gene expression, nor rare structural variants, had been identified as possible mechanisms through which environment might confer vulnerability to psychopathology. Many prevailing models of mental illness still pitted nature and nurture against each other as competing causes of psychopathology. Transactional models, in which biological vulnerabilities are presumed to interact with environmental risk factors to eventuate in mental illness, were few in number and limited in specification of neurobiological mechanisms, as advanced neuroimaging was in still in its infancy.
Given limitations in technology, most of what we learned about mental illness has traditionally been obtained through observation and classification of symptoms (see Chapter 2 [Beauchaine & Klein]). Although useful in early stages of identifying different forms of mental illness, symptom classification often tells us little if anything about underlying causal processes—be they biological or environmental—that lead to particular disorders. In editing this book, we therefore sought authors with expertise in the developmental psychopathology perspective, which emerged only about 35 years ago (see Chapter 1 [Hinshaw]). This perspective follows from the observation that human behavioral traits—including those that predispose to psychopathology—almost always arise from complex transactions between biological vulnerabilities and exposure to environmental risks across development. For example, heritable conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, schizophrenia, and substance dependence are shaped strongly by environmental influences, and effects of environmentally transmitted risks such as child maltreatment are moderated by genes and other biological predispositions (see e.g., Beauchaine & McNulty, 2013). Furthermore, through epigenetic mechanisms, the expression of several genes that are implicated in behavior regulation can be altered by experience, including exposure to stress and trauma—findings that defy anachronistic distinctions derived from reductionistic models. Thus, we asked all authors to identify both biological and environmental contributors to psychopathology and to discuss how these interact and transact across development to amplify risk.
This dynamic view of mental disorders served as the impetus for both the first and second editions of this book, and continues as a driving force behind the current third edition, which includes substantially updated material. Before the first edition was published, most graduate-level psychopathology texts were organized around the symptom-based approach to classifying mental illness, with limited consideration of the genetic and neural underpinnings of behavior or the interplay between biological vulnerabilities and environmental risk factors across development. However, in the nine years since the first edition was published, appreciation for the complexity of such transactions in the development of psychopathology has increased, and many new and exciting findings have emerged (see e.g., Beauchaine & Goodman, 2015).
Elucidating causes of mental illness is an international public health concern. The better we understand etiology across all relevant levels of analysis, including genetic, neural, familial, and cultural (to name a few), the better position we are in to devise more effective prevention and intervention programs (Beauchaine, Neuhaus, Brenner, & Gatzke-Kopp, 2008). Thus, even though this text does not address treatment, we hope readers will keep in mind while digesting each chapter how important it is to identify causes of mental illness in our efforts to reduce human suffering. This motivation played a central role in the National Institute of Mental Health (2015) establishing the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project. RDoC is a collaboration between NIMH and researchers around the world to develop a neuroscience-informed system of characterizing psychopathology that identifies genetic, neural, hormonal, and social determinants of major behavioral systems that contribute to human function, and at the extremes, mental illness (see Chapter 2 [Beauchaine & Klein]).
Readers will likely note that some disorders that are often addressed in psychopathology texts are not included in this book. For example, we do not cover developmental disorders or intellectual disability. In omitting these disorders, we are not implying that they are unimportant. Rather, the vast literature on developmental disabilities makes it difficult to cover the topic adequately in a text that already includes 24 chapters. Thus, we were left with a difficult choice, and we decided not to limit coverage of the conditions contained herein. We refer interested readers to other sources (e.g., Burack, Hodapp, Iarocci, & Zigler, 2011) for excellent coverage of this domain.
We now invite you to join us in the quest for a deeper understanding of the development of mental disorders, which almost always originate in childhood and adolescence. We hope that our emphases on genetic and other biological vulnerabilities, and how these interact with environmental risk factors and contexts will challenge any preconceived notions you may have about what is “biological” and what is “environmental” in relation to normal and atypical development. We hope as well that our coverage will prompt the next generation of investigators, clinicians, and policymakers to pursue the daunting but essential goal of explaining, treating, and preventing the devastation that so often accompanies psychopathology.
Theodore P. BeauchaineStephen P. Hinshaw
Beauchaine, T. P., & Goodman, S. H. (Eds.). (2015). Ontogenic process models of psychopathology [Special Section].
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
,
124
, 771–877.
Beauchaine, T. P., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2013). Preface. In T. P. Beauchaine & S. P. Hinshaw (Eds.),
Child and adolescent psychopathology
(2nd ed., pp. xi–xiii). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Beauchaine, T. P., & McNulty, T. (2013). Comorbidities and continuities as ontogenic processes: Toward a developmental spectrum model of externalizing behavior.
Development and Psychopathology
,
25
, 1505–1528.
Beauchaine, T. P., Neuhaus, E., Brenner, S. L., & Gatzke-Kopp, L. (2008). Ten good reasons to consider biological processes in prevention and intervention research.
Development and Psychopathology
,
20
, 745–774.
Burack, J. A., Hodapp, R. M., Iarocci, G., & Zigler, E. (Eds.). (2011).
The Oxford handbook of intellectual disability and development
. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hinshaw, S. P. (2007).
The mark of shame: Stigma of mental illness and an agenda for change
. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kessler, R. C., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Chatterji, S., Lee, S., Ormel, J.,…Wang, P. S. (2009). The global burden of mental disorders: An update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys.
Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale
,
18
, 23–33.
Martinez, A., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2016). Mental health stigma: Theory, developmental issues, and research priorities. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.),
Developmental psychopathology. Vol. 4: Risk, resilience, and intervention
(3rd ed., pp. 997–1039). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
National Institute of Mental Health. (2015).
NIMH strategic plan for research
. Retrieved from
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/strategic-planning-reports/index.shtml
WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium. (2004). Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.
Journal of the American Medical Association
,
291
, 2581–2590.
Peter Arnett
Pennsylvania State University
Robert F. Asarnow
UCLA School of Medicine
Theodore P. Beauchaine
The Ohio State University
Alexandra H. Bettis
Vanderbilt University
Joseph C. Blader
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Deepika Bose
University of California, Los Angeles
Sandra A. Brown
University of California, San Diego
Gabrielle A. Carlson
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Pamela M. Cole
Pennsylvania State University
Bruce E. Compas
Vanderbilt University
Sheila E. Crowell
University of Utah
Nicole A. Crocker
San Francisco VA Medical Center
Geraldine Dawson
Duke University School of Medicine
Marco Del Giudice
University of New Mexico
Lauren R. Doyle
San Diego State University
Bruce J. Ellis
University of Utah
Susan Faja
Harvard Medical School
Megan Finsaas
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Jennifer K. Forsyth
UCLA Department of Psychology
Susanna L. Fryer
University of California San Francisco
Lisa Gatzke-Kopp
Pennsylvania State University
Brandon L. Goldstein
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Meredith Gruhn
Vanderbilt University
Sarah E. Hall
Wheaton College
Nastassia J. Hajal
University of California, Los Angeles
Stephen P. Hinshaw
University of California, Berkeley
Sara R. Jaffee
University of Pennsylvania
Wesley G. Jennings
University of South Florida
Jerome Kagan
Harvard University
Erin A. Kaufman
University of Utah
Daniel N. Klein
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Benjamin B. Lahey
University of Chicago
Mark F. Lenzenweger
State University of New York at Binghamton and Weill Cornell Medical College
Deanna Linville
University of Oregon
Sarah N. Mattson
San Diego State University
Victoria C. Merritt
Pennsylvania State University
Jessica E. Meyer
Pennsylvania State University
Emily Neuhaus
Seattle Children's Research Institute
Joel Nigg
Oregon Health and Science University
Nicholas M. Perez
University of South Florida
John Piacentini
University of California, Los Angeles
Bruce D. Perry
Child Trauma Academy
Houston, TX
Emily Ricketts
University of California, Los Angeles
Donna J. Roybal
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Colin L. Sauder
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Katherine E. Shannon Bowen
University of Washington
Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff
Iowa State University
Wendy K. Silverman
Yale University School of Medicine
Eric Stice
Oregon Research Institute
Kristin L. Tomlinson
University of California, San Diego
Ian R. Gizer
University of Missouri
Irwin D. Waldman
Emory University
Carl F. Weems
Iowa State University
Jennifer Winward
University of California, San Diego
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Information continues to accumulate, at an increasingly rapid pace, about the complex processes and mechanisms underlying the genesis and maintenance of child and adolescent forms of mental disorder. Our major goal for this, the third edition of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology—in chapters written by international experts on the topics of interest—is to present current information, particularly surrounding core vulnerabilities and risk factors for major dimensions and categories of behavioral and emotional problems of youth. As in our prior editions (Beauchaine & Hinshaw, 2008, 2013), we emphasize psychobiological vulnerabilities in the active context of environmental forces that shape development. Framed somewhat differently, an important objective for each chapter is to delineate potential ontogenic processes in progressions to mental disorder, signifying mechanisms underlying individual development, with the realization that multiple vulnerabilities and risk factors interact and transact in case-specific yet ultimately predictable ways (Beauchaine & Hinshaw, 2016; Beauchaine & McNulty, 2013; Hinshaw, 2015). Parallel to the first two editions, we do not prioritize assessment or treatment-related information in this book, given that such coverage would necessitate a second or even third volume (e.g., Mash & Barkley, 2006, 2007).
Although the book's title focuses on children and adolescents, I note immediately that psychopathology, in many (if not most) cases, unfolds across the entire lifespan. Most so-called adult manifestations of mental disorder have origins, if not outright symptom presentations, prior to age 18. Moreover, even the earliest-appearing forms of behavioral and emotional disturbance typically portend escalating symptoms and impairments that can persist for decades (e.g., Kessler, Berglund, Demler, Jin, & Walters, 2005). Because resilience is also a possibility (Luthar, 2006), lifespan approaches to the topics of interest in this book are increasingly mandated for thorough understanding, carrying profound clinical as well as scientific implications. The child is the father of the man—and the mother of the woman—given that adults emerge from a cascading set of processes set in motion years before.
Before delving further, I immediately acknowledge the major debt that Ted Beauchaine and I owe to all of our contributors, as each is a major force in the scientific literature. We asked them to integrate state-of-the-art knowledge into the chapters that follow. Indeed, given the fast-escalating sophistication of mechanistic accounts of the development of psychopathology—which are now integrating genetic vulnerability and brain architecture in the presence of contextual forces across development, providing unprecedented levels of synthesis (Hinshaw, 2015)—no current compendium can afford to rest on the laurels of previous editions. The field's work is emerging at ever-more-detailed levels of analysis, with the promise of accounts that should, in the future, better inform evidence-based practice in the context of validated knowledge structures that can be applied to the clinical phenomena under consideration. In this initial chapter, I delineate the clinical and policy-related importance of the subject matter at hand, explicate core principles of developmental psychopathology (DP), and provide a general overview of the sequence of the chapters and their contents. In so doing I aim to set the stage for the cutting-edge advances and wisdom provided in the remainder of the volume.
The subject matter under consideration in this volume is at once clinically compelling and conceptually fascinating. Mental disorders yield substantial impairment, pain, and suffering for individuals, families, communities, and even cultures. The levels of personal and family tragedy involved are often devastating (Hinshaw, 2008a). At the same time, multifactorial vulnerabilities and risk factors—along with the complex, transactional developmental progressions that produce symptoms and impairments—challenge investigators from disciplines as diverse as neuroscience, genomics, public health, psychology, psychiatry, and public policy to emerge with new insights and syntheses. Overall, the clinical need is urgent and the scientific motivation compelling.
I begin with the concept of impairment. As elaborated in nearly every working guide to psychopathology (e.g., American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Wakefield, 1992), a designation of mental illness mandates, beyond behavior patterns or symptoms, that the individual in question display impairment or “harm” before a diagnosis is made. Clinically, then, attention must be paid to the often-excruciating pain and suffering attending to conditions as diverse as autism-spectrum disorders, various sequelae of maltreatment, severe attention deficits and impulsivity, interpersonal aggression, significant anxiety and mood disorders, thought disorders (including schizophrenia), eating-related conditions, self-destructive behavior patterns and personality configurations, and substance use disorders. Each is linked to setback and suffering, societal reverberations, and significant costs, the latter measurable in terms of huge expenditures borne by society, not related just to treatment per se but to the long-range outcomes of interpersonal, educational, and vocational failure that often attend to mental disorders (for an example of the huge costs linked to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], see Hinshaw & Scheffler, 2014).
Of course, impairment and harm—whether personal or experienced by others—are not sufficient for designating individuals as suffering from a mental disorder. In the view of Wakefield (1992), both harm (which involves a value-laden component) and dysfunction (a scientific construct) are required before mental illness should be diagnosed. Per Wakefield, dysfunction is “the failure of a mental mechanism to perform a natural function for which it was designed by evolution” (p. 373). Although mental health fields lack the objective markers and pathognomonic signs1 as those found in medicine and neurology (see Chapter 2 [Beauchaine & Klein]), our aim for the accumulated work in the present volume is to propel knowledge of dysfunctional mechanisms related to child and adolescent psychopathology. At the same time, findings from each chapter remind us that the origins of mental health conditions are reciprocal, dynamic, multilevel, and fully linked with processes linked to environmental context.
Not every aspect of psychopathology is necessarily impairing. At the level of evolution, it cannot be the case that mental disorder is inevitably or inexorably linked to personal failure or reduced fecundity; otherwise, how would conditions such as severe thought and mood disorders have perpetuated across human history (for evolutionary psychological explanations of mental disorder, see Neese, 2005)? Partial genetic loadings or vulnerabilities in biological relatives may well carry adaptive advantage; at least some aspects of symptoms could yield inspiration or thriving. Still, clinical and population-level facts regarding impairment linked to mental illness are stark. Emotional and behavioral problems among children and adolescents are distressingly prevalent and often lead to serious impairments in such crucial life domains as academic achievement, interpersonal competencies, and independent living skills (for thorough accounts, see Mash & Barkley, 2014). These conditions incur intensive pain for individuals, families, and communities at large, delimiting life opportunities and triggering major burdens for caregivers, school districts, and health care systems. In short, far too many young lives are compromised by mental illness.
Moreover, child and adolescent conditions and mental-health-related issues are growing in impact. As just one harrowing example, recent data from the World Health Organization reveal that, worldwide, the number-one cause of death for girls aged 15–19 years is now suicide (World Health Organization, 2014). Rates of self-injury have escalated rapidly over the past decades, and conditions like autism and ADHD are undergoing huge increases in diagnosed prevalence (e.g., Visser et al., 2014). The age of onset of serious mood disorders appears to be dropping, signaling the importance of contextual “push” in unearthing vulnerability (Hinshaw, 2009). In both the developing and developed world, serious mental disorder in youth portends major life consequences and even tragedy (see, for example, Sawyer et al., 2002).
Moving beyond childhood and adolescence per se, each year the Global Burden of Disease findings convey that a number of mental health conditions (along with neurological and substance use disorders) are among the world's most impairing illnesses (Whiteford, Ferrari, Degenhardt, Feigin, & Vos, 2015). Indeed, the variable called “years lived with disability” is dominated by individuals with mental disorders in our current era, on par with and often surpassing so-called physical diseases. By the time of adulthood, economic costs related to mental illness escalate with respect to employment-related impairments, yielding huge public-entitlement expenditures and lack of productivity. In short, from a number of important lenses, mental disorders are tragically impairing, robbing individuals of opportunities to thrive and be productive, often in the prime of their lives. If readers sense a call to action in these words, they have read my intentions precisely.
Crucially, mental health and physical health are inexplicably intertwined. It is now well known that serious mental disorder is associated with reductions in life expectancy averaging from 10 to 25 years (e.g., Chang et al., 2011). The reasons here are plentiful: high-risk lifestyles, lack of access to medical care, suicide, homicide, co-occurring chronic (e.g., cardiovascular disease; diabetes), and infectious (e.g., HIV) illnesses, and related unhealthy practices such as smoking and substance abuse. Even nonpsychotic disorders (e.g., ADHD; many forms of depression) are linked to long-term health risks (e.g., Barkley, Murphy, & Fischer, 2008). Recent findings reveal links between a range of mental disorders and a startling list of chronic physical illnesses (Scott et al., 2016).
Given this set of enormously costly, persistent, and deeply human consequences and needs, why not rely on traditional clinical efforts in psychology and psychiatry for solutions, given their long, venerable histories? As detailed in earlier accounts, however, these efforts have led to static views of psychopathology, with priority given to categorical diagnoses that inevitably lump together individuals with substantially different etiologic pathways into the same “condition” (e.g., Cicchetti, 1984, 1990). Moreover, the reciprocally deterministic nature of development, both typical and atypical, is not well captured by such static diagnostic systems (or nosologies, see Chapter 2 [Beauchaine & Klein]). Because of the huge expansion of knowledge in a host of related fields and subfields, the complex yet compelling perspectives offered by DP have taken hold with increasing rapidity, providing a call to investigators from a host of seemingly disparate disciplines regarding the promise of uncovering relevant mechanisms. Absent the multifaceted nature of DP models and paradigms, traditional perspectives are too often sterile and impoverished, carrying huge potential for treatments and prevention efforts to be directed at the wrong targets.
Despite scientific and clinical urgency surrounding this entire topic, barriers stand in the way of increased scientific understanding and access to evidence-based treatment. Perhaps the primary issue is that mental disturbance, at any age, remains highly stigmatized (e.g., Hinshaw, 2007; Hinshaw & Stier, 2008; Martinez & Hinshaw, 2016). Intensive stigma and shame—related to the unpredictability of the behavior patterns in question, the threat they convey to perceivers' well-being, and their media-propelled linkages to violence and incompetence—too often preclude help seeking, prevent empathic responses, and serve to render mental health a lower priority than physical health, despite inextricable linkages between the two. Depressingly, although public knowledge of mental illness has grown considerably since the 1950s, the U.S. public is far more likely to link mental illness with dangerousness than in the past (see Phelan, Link, Stueve, & Pescosolido, 2000). Moreover, rates of stigma and social distance related to mental illness have not changed appreciably in recent decades (Pescosolido et al., 2010). Reasons are complex but may relate to (a) increased numbers of seriously impaired individuals on the streets, without needed community services and resources; (b) enhanced public awareness that “dangerousness” is one of the few mandates for involuntary commitment to hospitals—along with frequent media attention linking mental illness to mass shootings, oftentimes inaccurately; and (c) the tenuousness of evidence that biogenetic ascriptions to mental illness (i.e., that it is a “brain disease” or a “disease like any other”) can eliminate stigmatization (see Haslam & Kvaale, 2015; Martinez, Piff, Mendoza-Denton, & Hinshaw, 2011; Pescosolido et al., 2010). Indeed, although biological perspectives are a necessary antidote to the “blaming the family” and “castigating the individual” perspectives that dominated psychology and psychiatry for much of the 20th century, their reductionistic promotion is neither accurate nor aiding the cause of stigma reduction, in part because they appear to promote pessimism and dehumanization. Instead, DP perspectives offer complex as opposed to simplistic or reductionistic conceptions of mental disorder, potentially leading to appreciation of the multidetermined biological and contextual factors related to psychopathology instead of personal or family weakness or blame, or notions of genetic flaw (e.g., Haslam & Kvaale, 2015; Martinez & Hinshaw, 2016).
In all, despite major advances in both basic science and clinical applications in recent years, as highlighted in the following chapters, the field's knowledge of developing brains and minds in multiple, interacting contexts is still rudimentary. It is hard to imagine otherwise, given the sheer complexity of the subject matter under consideration. As noted in introductory chapters to the earlier editions of this volume (Hinshaw, [2008b, 2013]), the trajectory of human prenatal neural development is nothing short of staggering, with literally thousands of new neurons proliferating during each second of development after the first few weeks following conception, as well as massive pruning and synaptogenesis in the first several years of life. Still, for those who enjoy a challenge and are excited by questions that will take both many decades and many great minds and scientific teams to answer—with the potential payoff of bettering the human condition—the hope is that this volume will serve as a call to join the major scientific and clinical efforts so urgently needed. Indeed, if the field is to continue to make headway toward understanding, treating, and preventing the serious clinical conditions that emerge during childhood and adolescence, the best minds of the current and forthcoming generations of scholars and clinicians need to join the effort.
At this point, I provide a review of core axioms and principles of DP. These points reflect the multidisciplinarity and transactional nature of the field, signifying that static models and unidimensional conceptions are simply not able to explain the fascinating and troubling development of maladaptive behavior patterns comprising the domain of psychopathology.
Many of the conceptual bases for integrating developmental principles and models into the study of child and adolescent psychopathology have been present for several centuries, spanning diverse fields and disciplines (e.g., Cicchetti, 1990). Yet it is only in the past 40 years that DP has taken formal shape as a perspective on behavioral and emotional disturbance throughout the lifespan, and as a major conceptual guidepost for the study of both normal and atypical development. During this period, DP has exerted a major force on clinical child psychology, child psychiatry, developmental psychology, developmental neuroscience, and a number of other disciplines in both behavioral and neurological sciences. Not only have new courses been formed at major universities, but journals have been created and new paradigms of conceptualizing mental disorder have gained traction (Insel et al., 2010; see Chapter 2 [Beauchaine & Klein]). It is remarkable how pervasive the DP perspective has become, galvanizing a host of clinical and scientific efforts and in the process becoming mainstream.
DP simultaneously comprises a theoretical model regarding the origins of mental disorders, a multidisciplinary approach linking principles of normative development to the genesis and maintenance of psychopathology, and a scientific discipline closely tied to clinical child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry but transcending the usual diagnosis-based emphases of these fields (Cicchetti, 2016; Lewis & Randolph, 2014). Through its focus on the dynamic interplay of biology and context, genes and environments, and transactional processes linking multilevel influences to the development of healthy and atypical functioning, DP has come to dominate current conceptual models of psychopathology. Many of its core ideas emerge from disciplines such as philosophy, systems theory, and embryology (see Gottlieb & Willoughby, 2006, for elaboration). The syntheses represented in this volume, reflecting DP's continuing growth into the first two decades of the 21st century, are cutting-edge, given the major knowledge explosion in recent years, related largely to greater understanding of psychobiological influences as they transact with contextual forces.
What characterizes a truly developmental view of psychopathology, versus descriptive, symptom-focused presentations dominating most classification systems? DP's originators contended with this core question (e.g., Achenbach, 1974; Cicchetti, 1990; Rutter & Sroufe, 1984; Sroufe & Rutter, 2000), and current syntheses still grapple with the fundamental issues involved (Cicchetti, 2016; Lewis & Rudolph, 2014). From my perspective the key issues constitute multidisciplinarity; acknowledgment of dynamic, multilevel processes; and appreciation of systems-level change in producing developmental transitions (whether the systems are biological or social). Despite the many gains that have been made, it is important to realize at the same time how far we must still travel to comprehend the development and maintenance of psychopathology via the tools and models of DP. The trail ahead is long and steep.
I list several core points that are commonly viewed as central to the DP perspective. These include the necessity of (a) interweaving studies of normal development and pathological functioning into a true synthesis; (b) examining developmental continuities and discontinuities of traits, behavior patterns, emotional responses, and disorders; (c) exploring both risk and protective factors and their interplay, so that competence, strength, and resilience as well as pathology and impairment can be understood; (d) involving reciprocal, transactional models of influence in the field's causal models through which linear patterns of association and causation are replaced by probabilistic, dynamic, nonlinear, and complex conceptual models; and (e) capturing the importance of both psychobiological vulnerabilities and social/cultural context in understanding the function of behavioral and emotional patterns.
Three related principles bear emphasis:
Multiple pathways to pathology exist. Indeed, disparate routes may lead to behaviorally indistinguishable conditions or outcomes, exemplifying the construct of
equifinality
. For example, aggressive behavior can result from physical abuse, from a heritable tendency toward disinhibition, from injury to the frontal lobes, from coercive parenting interchanges with the developing child, from prenatal and perinatal risk factors acting in concert with early experiences of insecure attachment or parental rejection, or—as is probably most often the case—from different combinations of these vulnerabilities and risk factors. A key problem with static nosologies is their assumption that everyone receiving a similar psychiatric diagnosis has the “same” underlying patterns and processes of psychopathology. Similarly,
multifinality
pertains when a given vulnerability, risk factor, or initial state fans out into disparate outcomes across different individuals (Cicchetti & Rogosch, 1996). Maltreatment may or may not lead to severe maladaptation, depending on a host of intervening factors. As another example, extremes of inhibited temperament may induce intense shyness and social withdrawal; but other, healthier outcomes are also possible, depending on the presence or absence of additional risk or protective factors.
DP models often place emphasis on person-centered research designs, in which the typical practice of examining global effects of one or more risk/protective variables across an entire sample or population is supplemented by consideration of unique subgroups—whether defined by genotypes, personality variables, socialization practices, neighborhoods, or other key factors—and their unique developmental journeys across the lifespan (see Bergman, von Eye, & Magnusson, 2006). From a slightly different perspective, developmental continuities and discontinuities may well differ across homogeneous subgroups of participants. Even in variable-centered research, key moderator variables and mediator processes must always be considered (e.g., Hinshaw, 2002; Kraemer, Stice, Kazdin, Offord, & Kupfer, 2001), to ensure that (a) results are applicable to subsets of participants grouped on moderator variable of interest (males versus females, those from different ethnic groups, or those with different patterns of comorbidity) and (b) underlying mechanisms of change, gleaned from mediator variables, are taken into account.
Given the rapid growth in recent years of genomic models as well as brain imaging methods, DP researchers in the 21st century must pay increasing attention to the role of the brain, and neuroscientific principles in general, toward accounting for the wide range of extant pathologies and their devastating effects. The field has come a long way from the middle of the 20th century, when biological and temperamental factors were virtually ignored in accounts of child development and psychopathology. Again, however, progress will be stalled if the psychosocial reductionism of prior generations is replaced by biological and genetic reductionism in the current era. A key antidote is for students and investigators to embrace a multiple-levels-of-analysis approach, integrating across genes and gene products, neural systems, and temperamental traits and core behavioral patterns, in contexts of families, schools, and neighborhoods, including the general culture (Cicchetti, 2008; Insel et al., 2010). Isolated, single-factor or single-level models and paradigms are inadequate to the task.
In other words, the greatest potential for progress in the DP field is made when investigators travel back and forth between “micro” and “macro” levels—including intermediate steps or pathways—to understand mechanisms that underlie development of adjustment and maladjustment. The essential task is to link events at the level of genes (e.g., genetic polymorphisms; transcription and translation), neurotransmitters, and neuroanatomical development, into individual differences in temperament, social cognition, and emotional response patterns. At the same time, such bottom-up conceptions must be supplemented by top-down understanding of ways in which family interaction patterns, peer relations, school factors, and neighborhood/community variables influence the developing, plastic brain, even at the level of gene expression (see Chapter 3 [Beauchaine, Gatzke-Kopp, & Gizer]). Overall, progress toward understanding pathological behavior will require multidisciplinary efforts in which investigators ranging from geneticists and biochemists, scientists focusing on basic psychological processes and individual psychopathology, experts on family and neighborhood processes, examiners of clinical service systems, and public health officials as well as policy experts must work collaboratively and in increasingly diversified ways. The phenomena under consideration are too complex, too dynamic, and too multifaceted to be understood by an exclusive focus on psychobiological processes, family factors, peer processes, or cultural factors in isolation. Performing the necessary kinds of investigations often mandates large-scale, complex, and interdisciplinary work, necessitating collaborations across traditional disciplinary boundaries.
Note that key concepts and principles of DP have been stated and restated across a large number of articles, chapters, and books. Indeed, detailed discussion could easily fill a volume unto itself. The challenge for the current chapter is to encapsulate several core tenets, in the service of foreshadowing and illuminating content on specific processes and specific mental dimensions and disorders.
As opposed to the study of discrete, mutually exclusive categories of disorder, DP models emphasize that nearly all relevant phenomena represent aberrations in continua of normal developmental pathways and processes—and, accordingly, that without understanding typical development, the study of pathology will remain incomplete and decontextualized. As just one example, related to a research area within my own expertise, illuminating the nature of ADHD requires thorough understanding of normative development of attention, impulse control, and self-regulation (e.g., Barkley, 2015; Hinshaw & Scheffler, 2014; Nigg, Hinshaw, & Huang-Pollack, 2006; Sonuga-Barke, Bitsakou, & Thompson, 2010; see also Chapter 13
