Construction Innovation E-Book
110,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Wissenschaft und neue Technologien
- Serie: Innovation in the Built Environment
- Sprache: Englisch
Construction innovation is an important but contested concept, both in industry practice and academic reflection and research. A fundamental reason for this is the nature of the construction industry itself: the industry and the value creation activities taking place there are multi-disciplinary, heterogeneous, distributed and often fragmented.
This book takes a new approach to construction innovation, revealing different perspectives, set in a broader context. It coalesces multiple theoretical and practice-based views in order to stimulate reflection and to prepare the ground for further synthesis. By being clear, cogent and unambiguous on the most basic definitions, it can mobilise a plurality of perspectives on innovation to promote fresh thinking on how it can be studied, enabled, measured, and propagated across the industry.
This book does not gloss over the real-life complexity of construction innovation. Instead, its authors look explicitly at the challenges that conceptual issues entail and by making their own position clear, they open up fresh intellectual space for reflection.
Construction Innovation examines innovation from different positions and through different conceptual lenses to reveal the richness that the theoretical perspectives offer to our understanding of the way that the construction sector actors innovate at both project and organizational levels.
The editors have brought together here leading scholars to deconstruct the concept of innovation and to discuss the merits of different perspectives, their commonalities and their diversity. The result is an invaluable sourcebook for those studying and leading innovation in the design, the building and the maintenance of our built environment.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 449
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015
Ähnliche
CONTENTS
Cover
Series page
Title page
Copyright page
About the Authors
Foreword
Preface
1 Introduction
Construction Innovation: Concepts and Controversies
Perspectives on Construction Innovation
Instead of Conclusions
References
2 Incentives for Innovation in Construction
Introduction
A Schumpeterian Definition of Construction Innovation
Innovation in Construction
Construction Innovation and Complexity
Construction Innovation and Asymmetric Information
Construction Innovation and Multi-Parametric Optimization
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
3 Built-in Innovation and the Ambiguity of Designing Accessibility
Introduction: Making Innovation Accessible
Methodology
The Case: The World’s Most Accessible Office Building
Discussion: In Search of the Innovation
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
4 Stakeholder Integration Champions and Innovation in the Built Environment
Introduction
Stakeholder Integration Champions, Collaboration and Participation
Method
Creating the Conditions for Innovation in the Built Environment
Integration for Innovation
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
5 Grassroots Innovation in the Construction Industry
Introduction
Grassroots Innovation
The Elements of Grassroots Innovation
Grassroots Innovation in Practice
Assessing the Potential of Grassroots Innovation in Construction
Conclusion
References
6 Regulation and Innovation in New Build Housing
Introduction
Regulation and Innovation for Sustainable Building
Case Study Example
Conclusions
Acknowledgement
References
7 An Industrial Network Perspective on Innovation in Construction
Introduction
Innovation in the Construction Industry
An Industrial Network Perspective on Innovation
Understanding Innovation as Resource Interaction Processes
Empirical Examples
Conclusions
References
8 Innovation Diffusion Across Firms
Introduction
Antecedents
Central Themes
Points of Departure
How to Approach the Problem
Mapping Networks of Innovation Diffusion
The Innovation Diffusion Network
The Network of Firms Engaged in the Innovation Diffusion Process
Sense-Making Framework
Conclusion
References
9 Clients Shaping Construction Innovation
Introduction
Empirical Grounding
Findings
Conclusions
References
10 Innovation in Road Building
Introduction
Methods
Findings and Discussion
Pre-Project Product Certification Process
Conclusion
References
11 Innovating for Integration: Clients as Drivers of Industry Improvement
Introduction
Theory of Integration
Drivers and Strategies for Innovation Diffusion
Framework for Analysis
Integrated Project Delivery
Building Information Modelling
Supply Chain Integration
Conclusions
References
12 Project Delivery Systems and Innovation: The Case of US Road Building
Introduction
Design-Build
Public-Private Partnerships
Construction-Manager-as-General-Contractor
Conclusion
References
13 The Leitmotif of Building-Products Innovation in Finland
Introduction
The Evolving Context of Building Products Innovation in Finland
The Evolution of Industry Strategies
Innovation Strategies in the Finnish Building Products Industry
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Advertisements
Index
End User License Agreement
List of Tables
Chapter 04
Table 4.1 Types of SICs in the built environment. Examples and projects studied for each type.
Chapter 06
Table 6.1 Key Microgeneration Technologies for New Housing
Chapter 09
Table 9.1 Types of Innovation and Methods for Client/User Interaction.
Table 9.2 Overview of Technological Frames.
Table 9.3 Role of Clients and Implications for Sociotechnical Change in Construction.
Chapter 10
Table 10.1 Key Product Innovation Drivers, Australian Road Construction.
Chapter 11
Table 11.1 Framework for Analysis.
Table 11.2 Integrated Project Delivery.
Table 11.3 Building Information Modelling.
Table 11.4 Supply Chain Integration.
Chapter 12
Table 12.1 Additional Mountain View Corridor Project Scope Enabled by Innovations Resulting from Construction-Manager-as-General-Contractor Delivery.
Chapter 13
Table 13.1 Information about the companies in 2013 and innovation cases studied regarding environmental objectives in building product innovation.
Table 13.2 Case firms and descriptions of innovation cases with environmental content.
Table 13.3 Summary of innovation characteristics and drivers.
List of Illustrations
Chapter 08
Figure 8.1 Innovation Diffusion Network for One Actor Within One Firm. (Larsen 2011)
Figure 8.2 Network of Firms Enacting the Innovation Diffusion Process (not Artificially Bounded by One Firm).
Figure 8.3 Network of Firms Enacting the Innovation Diffusion Process (not Artificially Bounded by One Firm).
Figure 8.4 Network of Firms Enacting the Innovation Diffusion Process (not Artificially Bounded by One Firm).
Figure 8.5 Innovation Diffusion Network – Within
One Firm
, Across the
Network of Firms
(developed from Larsen 2005, 2011).
Chapter 09
Figure 9.1 The Construction Client as a User.
Figure 9.2 The Construction Client as a Producer.
Figure 9.3 The Construction Client as an intermediary.
Chapter 10
Figure 10.1 Participants in the building and construction project system. based on Gann and Salter (1998).
Chapter 11
Figure 11.1
The three imperatives, research areas and vision of IDDS
. (Owen et al., 2013).
Figure 11.2 Winch’s model of the innovation structures in the construction industry. (Winch 1998).
Chapter 12
Figure 12.1 Contractual Relationships Between Parties in Design Build.
Figure 12.2 Contractual Relationships Among Parties in Private Public Partnerships.
Figure 12.3 Contractual Relationships Between Parties in Construction-Manager-as-General-Contractor.
Chapter 13
Figure 13.1 The intermediary position of the building products industry in the value chain.
Guide
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Pages
ii
iii
iv
ix
x
xi
xii
xiii
xiv
xv
xvii
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
Innovation in the Built Environment
Series advisors
Clare Eriksson, Royal Institution of Chartered SurveyorsCarolyn Hayles, University of BathRichard Kirkham, University of ManchesterAndrew Knight, Nottingham Trent UniversityStephen Pryke, University College LondonSteve Rowlinson, University of Hong KongDerek Thomson, Loughborough UniversitySara Wilkinson, University of Technology, Sydney
Innovation in the Built Environment (IBE) is a book series for the construction industry published jointly by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and Wiley-Blackwell. Books in the series address issues of current research and practitioner relevance and take an international perspective, drawing from research applications and case studies worldwide.
Innovation in the Built Environment:
presents the latest thinking on the processes that influence the design, construction and management of the built environment
based on strong theoretical concepts and draws on both established techniques for analysing the processes that shape the built environment – and on those from other disciplines
embraces a comparative approach, allowing best practice to be put forward
demonstrates the contribution that effective management of built environment processes can make
Books in the IBE series
Akintoye & Beck:
Policy, Finance & Management for Public-Private Partnerships
Booth,
et al.: Solutions for Climate Change Challenges in the Built Environment
Boussabaine:
Risk Pricing Strategies for Public-Private Partnerships
Kirkham:
Whole Life-Cycle Costing
London,
et al.: Construction Internationalisation
Lu & Sexton:
Innovation in Small Professional Practices in the Built Environment
Pryke:
Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies
Orstavik,
et al.: Construction Innovation
Roper & Borello:
International Facility Management
Senaratne & Sexton:
Managing Change in Construction Projects: a Knowledge-Based Approach
Wilkinson,
et al.: Sustainable Building Adaptation
We welcome proposals for new, high quality, research-based books which are academically rigorous and informed by the latest thinking; please contact:
Madeleine MetcalfeSenior Commissioning EditorCONSTRUCTION, CIVIL ENGINEERING & BUILT ENVIRONMENTWiley-[email protected]
Construction Innovation
Edited by
Finn Orstavik
University College Buskerud and VestfoldNorway
Andrew Dainty
Loughborough UniversityUK
Carl Abbott
University of SalfordUK
This edition first published 2015© 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Registered officeJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom.
Editorial offices9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, United Kingdom.The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom.
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author(s) have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Construction innovation / edited by Finn Orstavik, Andrew Dainty, Carl Abbott. pages cm Includes index.
ISBN 978-1-118-65553-5 (cloth)1. Civil engineering–Technological innovations. 2. Construction industry–Technological innovations. I. Orstavik, Finn., editor. II. Dainty, Andrew, editor. III. Abbott, Carl, editor. TA153.C728 2015 624.068′4–dc23 2014026260
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Cover image: [Production Editor to insert]Cover design by [Production Editor to insert]
About the Authors
Carl AbbottCarl Abbott is Professor of Construction Innovation & Enterprise in the School of the Built Environment at the University of Salford and Director of the Salford Centre for Research & Innovation (SCRI) in the built and human environment. Carl’s research interests include innovation in university-city regions and the sustainable delivery of housing. Significant research projects in which Carl has been involved include the EU funded ‘INNOPOLIS’, the Economic and Social Research Council Distributed Innovation Project ‘The impact of environmental regulation on innovation in the housing sector’, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council/Électricité de France funded ‘People Energy & Buildings’ project on the uptake of micro-generation technologies in housing.
Catherine BarlowCatherine Barlow is a Research Fellow at the University of Salford and was previously a researcher for a regional housing association. Catherine’s research has primarily focussed on innovation and regulation in the context of UK housing. Catherine’s PhD was on the impact of the Code for Sustainable Homes on UK housing. Since gaining her PhD, Catherine has developed her research interests working as a Research Fellow on projects concerned with low energy housing including the Greater Manchester Local Interaction Programme, Milesecure 2050 and the Innovative Retrofit of Housing.
Frédéric BougrainFrédéric Bougrain works as a researcher for the Economics and Human Sciences Department at the Scientific and Technical Centre for Building, University Paris Est in France. His research is concentrated on innovations in the building and construction industry, public–private partnerships, asset management in the social housing sector and energy-saving performance contracts. He previously lectured at the University of Orléans (France) where he defended his PhD thesis on innovation, small- and medium-size enterprises and the consequences for regional technology policy.
Mario BourgaultMario Bourgault has conducted more than a decade of research in the field of innovation and project management. He has held the Canada Research Chair in Technology Project Management since 2004. He is also head of Polytechnique Montreal’s graduate program in project management. His work has been published in a number of journals, including Project Management Journal, International Journal of Project Management, R&D Management and International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. In addition to his academic credentials, he spent several years in the field working as a professional engineer, and he maintains close ties with the industry as a researcher and expert consultant.
Lena E. BygballeLena E. Bygballe is Associate Professor at the Department of Strategy and Logistics at BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway. She is also chair of the Centre for the construction industry in the same department. Her research interests are in the area of interorganisational relationships with particular focus on organisation, learning and innovation.
Andrew DaintyAndrew Dainty is Professor of Construction Sociology at Loughborough University’s School of Civil and Building Engineering. For the past 20 years, his research has focused on social action within construction and other project-based sectors, particularly the social rules and processes that affect people working as members of project teams. He has a particular interest in practice-based perspectives on innovation in construction and in the relationship between innovation strategy and the performance of project-based firms. Andrew is co-editor of the leading research journal Construction Management and Economics, a past chair of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) and former joint coordinator of CIB Task Group 76 on Recognising Innovation in Construction.
Nathalie DrouinNathalie Drouin, PhD (University of Cambridge), MBA (HEC-Montréal), is the Associate Dean of Research and former Director of Graduate programs in Project Management, School of Management at Université du Québec à Montreal (ESG UQAM) and a professor, Department of Management and Technology, ESG UQAM. She teaches initiation and strategic management of projects in the Graduate Project Management Programs. Her research has been funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Institute of Health Research, the Quebec Research Council, and the Project Management Institute. She is a Member of the Scientific Committee of the Project Management Research Chair, ESG UQAM.
Marianne FormanMarianne Forman is Senior Researcher at the Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University, Denmark. Her research area encompasses innovation, user-driven innovation, sustainable transition, environmental management in companies and product chains, project management and change processes, working environment and cooperation inside companies and among companies.
She graduated from the Danish Technical University (1991), where she also defended her PhD thesis on Processes of Change and Participation Forms in Preventive Environmental Work (1998).
Martha E. GrossCurrently based in Arup’s New York office, Martha Gross is a Senior Infrastructure Consultant with a focus on delivering transportation megaprojects. From her past and present roles as contractor, owner’s engineer, and lender’s advisor on highway and bridge projects up to $3 billion in construction cost, she has gained extensive first-hand experience with design-build and public-private partnership contracting. Among other recognitions she holds an MBA and PhD in civil engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, where her research focussed on infrastructure finance and delivery via PPP contracts.
Håkan HåkanssonHåkan Håkansson is Professor in International Management at the Department of Innovation and Economic Organisation at BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway. His research interests are in the area of interorganisational business relationships and business networks with particular focus on innovation and economic development.
Kim HaugbølleKim Haugbølle has been working closely with construction clients for almost twenty years, and he was instrumental in the establishment of the Danish Construction Clients Association in 1999. He is coordinating the CIB Working Commission on Clients and Users in Construction with Professor David Boyd. Kim has published extensively on innovation and technology assessment in the construction industry with special emphasis on procurement, sustainable design and life cycle economics. The academic insights have been turned into the development of a life cycle costing tool for the Danish version of the German Sustainable Building Council sustainability certification scheme.
J. L. (John) HeintzDr. John L. Heintz is Head of Section and Associate Professor in the Design and Construction Management Section of the Faculty of Architecture at the Delft University of Technology. Before pursuing his PhD in architecture at the Technical University of Delft, he earned his professional degree in architecture from the University of Calgary, graduating with the AIA Gold Medal. His research interests include the strategic management of architectural firms, new forms of architectural practise, design collaboration, design quality and knowledge sharing in design projects. He is co-author of De Architect in de Praktijk (in Dutch).
Malena IngemanssonMalena Ingemansson is post doc at the Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Uppsala University. Her research interests are in the area of technology development and innovation involving settings such as industrial production and academia.
Kristian KreinerKristian Kreiner is professor at Copenhagen Business School, Department of Organization. He was the founder and director of the Centre for Management Studies of the Building Process (www.CLIBYG.org). In his research, he aims to understand how things are organized under conditions of complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity. These interests have occasioned detailed empirical studies in many sectors and industries, not the least in construction. Current studies include research on the ways in which we manage to make difficult or impossible choices, for example in connection with architectural competitions.
Heli KoukkariHeli Koukkari is Principal Scientist at the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, which she joined in 1982. Her R&D topics have covered overall performance and sustainability of buildings; concrete, steel, composite and timber structures and most recently innovation processes. She has been vice-chair of the COST Action C25, Sustainability of Constructions – Integrated Approach to Life-Time Structural Engineering, and member of the RTD Committee of the European Network of Building Research Institutes ENBRI; of the TC14 Sustainable and Eco-Efficient Steel Construction of the European Convention for Constructional Steelwork ECCS; and of Work Group3, Construction & Infrastructure of the European Steel Technology Platform ESTEP.
Graeme D. LarsenGraeme D. Larsen is Lecturer in Construction Management and the School Director of Post Graduate Research Studies, University of Reading. His research interests are wide reaching, from innovation diffusion to competitiveness networks of small- to medium-size enterprises. He is actively engaged with the Chartered Institute of Building, being an academic and industry membership assessor. His more recent research focused on corporate social responsibility, use of communication networks, innovative procurement methods in niche markets, sustainability and resilience planning.
Gonzalo LizarraldeA specialist in planning, management and evaluation of international architecture projects, Gonzalo Lizarralde is a professor at the School of Architecture at the Université de Montréal. He has fifteen years of experience in consulting for architecture and construction projects and has published numerous articles in the fields of low-cost housing and project management. Dr. Lizarralde has been awarded research grants and scholarships from the National Research Foundation of South Africa, the Canadian and Quebec governments and other funding agencies. Dr. Lizarralde is director of the IF Research Group, which studies the processes related to the planning and development of construction projects.
Martin LoosemoreMartin Loosemore is Professor of Construction Management at UNSW, Sydney, Australia. He is a Visiting Professor at The University of Loughborough, UK, and a Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and of the Chartered Institute of Building. Martin was an advisor on international workplace productivity and reform to the Australian Federal Government’s 2003 Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. He served for six years on the Australian Federal Government’s Built Environment Industry Innovation Council advising on Australian Government innovation policy.
Karen ManleyKaren Manley is a researcher in the area of innovation in infrastructure projects. She is currently Associate Professor, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology and Higher Degree Research Director, School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment. She has many years of experience as an academic and private consultant, specialising in the application of post-neoclassical approaches to the analysis of innovation and industry growth. She investigates knowledge flows, networking and innovation systems to shed light on the performance of a number of industries, including the construction industry. Her current research focus is on innovative approaches to collaborative procurement and sustainable building. She has published extensively in international journals, and her work has informed the development of government policy across Australia in the area of innovation capacity.
R. Edward Minchin Jr.In a twenty-nine-year career in industry and academia, Dr. Minchin has worked as a contractor’s unskilled labourer; contractor’s cost estimator; highway, bridge and drainage designer; owner’s inspector; owner’s field engineer; transportation agency executive; lecturer; researcher; and arbiter. Since obtaining his PhD (Pennsylvania State University, 1999), his research has resulted in over 95 publications with recent emphasis on project delivery systems, especially CMGC and DB. He currently holds the Rinker Professorship and serves as Director of Master’s Programs at the M.E. Rinker Sr. School of Construction Management at the University of Florida. In his role as arbiter, he currently sits on six Disputes Review Boards.
Finn OrstavikFinn Orstavik has his doctoral degree in sociology from the University of Oslo (1996). He is specializes in innovation studies and has early in his career done historical studies of military research and development and private sector innovation in digital computers in Norway. His later research covers empirical and historical studies of industry development, the institutional system of innovation and innovation policy. His theoretical interests span Giddens’ structuration theory, general systems theory, Luhmann’s theory of social systems, innovation theory and American pragmatist philosophers (e.g. Dewey, Mead, Follett). He has studied innovation and knowledge processes in the construction industry over a period of 10 years and has published studies amongst others on industrial clusters, innovation systems and innovation in Norwegian house building. Orstavik has been Research Director of the Centre for Regional Innovation and teaches master level courses on Innovation and Leadership and Innovation and Globalisation at the University College in Buskerud and Vestfold in Norway.
Timothy M. RoseTimothy M. Rose is a Lecturer in the Science and Engineering Faculty at Queensland University of Technology and a Course Leader of the Master of Project Management and Master of Infrastructure Management courses at this university. Prior to this appointment, Tim worked as a senior project manager on major construction projects in Australia. His multidisciplinary research has contributed to both construction project management and broader business management in project based-industries as the presence of his research in journals across these fields has demonstrated. He has published more than twenty peer reviewed articles and book chapters in the areas of procurement, sustainability and innovation, and has a strong research interest in applied economic and psychological-based models that predict motivation, commitment and performance across complex construction supply chains.
Martin SextonMartin Sexton has been Principal Investigator and Co-investigator on numerous Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council and European Commission awards totalling in excess of £7 million. He is recognised internationally for his research in the area of innovation management, particularly in the contexts of small construction firms and knowledge-intensive professional service firms. Martin is currently focusing on transition management for sustainability, environmental innovation, energy systems and the impact of regulation on innovation. Martin was formerly the Joint Co-ordinator of the CIB Working Commission 65 – Organisation and Management of Construction.
Laurent VielLaurent Viel is a PhD candidate at Université de Montréal. He has been affiliated with the IF Research Group since 2012. His research examines the ethical considerations of collaboration and participation processes in urban projects. Since 2013, he works with a municipality in France.
J. W. F. (Hans) WamelinkHans Wamelink is Professor of Design & Construction Management and Head of the Department Real Estate & Housing at the Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology. His main focus is on cooperation in the supply chain, new ways to contract and process innovation. Previously he worked for ten years as part-time Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Technology Management of Eindhoven University of Technology. He has also gained substantial experience in practise as the owner and managing director of a management and consultancy firm.
Foreword
Members of the CIB community worldwide are proud of the contribution that they collectively make to creating and maintaining a better built environment. They are aware of the challenges that the construction industry faces and the important role that innovation plays in realising powerful solutions. Nevertheless, despite the strong interest, agreeing on a simple definition and an approach to measuring innovation remains elusive. CIB members may feel that the innovation construct is both complex and nebulous, and disagree about questions as fundamental as whether the industry is innovative or not. However, one thing that all agree upon is that we need to know more about the innovation phenomenon. It was for this reason that I was keen to endorse the idea of creating a CIB Task Group titled ‘Recognising Innovation’ in Dubrovnik in 2009.
During its lifetime the group and its members were a vibrant presence at CIB events. Amongst other activities, they hosted debates, conducted scenario workshops and ran special paper tracks. Not least importantly they announced the idea of publishing this book. Here they have coalesced many of the perspectives emerging through the efforts of the group, along with those of other leading scholars in the construction innovation field. The result is a presentation of an eclectic and informative set of perspectives that sheds light on innovation and its importance in realising our aspirations for the built environment.
On behalf of CIB and our membership, I am very pleased to endorse this publication. It is a thought-provoking and valuable contribution to research on innovation in the built environment. I am confident that it provides important insights for anyone wishing to understand, to do research on or to effectively manage innovation in or adjacent to the construction sector.
Dr. Wim Bakens
Secretary General, CIB
Preface
The origin of this book lies in the work of an international collaborative task group convened by the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), and the development of ideas have been enriched by a research project on knowledge processes in construction carried out through the years 2007–2012 with financing from the Research Council of Norway and industry partners. The CIB Task Group 76 explored the ways in which innovation was recognised and measured in the construction industry. It brought together diverse perspectives on innovation in the built environment in order to understand the multiple ways in which the term has been mobilised and deployed in construction research and practice. Over three and a half years, the group provided a forum for critical debates, workshops, and special paper tracks, through which a range of divergent meanings and implications of innovation were revealed. This book coalesces some of these perspectives with those of other scholars within the construction innovation field. It has been written to stimulate new debates in construction innovation within the research and practice communities and to inspire reflection on the ways in which innovation can be considered and ultimately capitalised on for the benefit of organisations and society at large.
As the editors of the volume, we wish to thank all the excellent scholars who have contributed to the book in such a positive and insightful way. We also wish to thank our friends in Wiley Blackwell who have encouraged and supported this project all the way from inception to completion. We hope that this book provides some thought-provoking insights that will inspire future research and scholarship into the ways in which we study, recognise, and encourage innovation within the construction sector.
Finn Orstavik, Andy Dainty and Carl Abbott
May 2014
1Introduction
Finn Orstavik, Andrew Dainty and Carl Abbott
Historically, two very different and yet inseparable impulses have shaped modern business: a quest for more efficient production and the pursuit of competitive advantage through novelty and innovation. Production is typically carried out in enterprises whose survival depends on offering goods and services for which alternatives may be available from a range of competing suppliers. To survive and flourish under such circumstances, enterprises have to make efforts, for example, to reduce prices (by avoiding waste and increasing productivity) and/or to create novel value propositions (by innovating). Although these fundamental agendas are certainly not mutually exclusive, embracing innovation encompasses much more than addressing production and distribution inefficiencies. In his early theory on economic development, the Austrian-American economist Joseph A. Schumpeter suggests that what really counts is the competition from new commodities, new technology, new sources of supply, and new types of organization (Schumpeter 1983). Unlike gradual efficiency improvements, he reiterates in a later work, that innovation ‘strikes not at the margins of the profits and the outputs of the existing firms but at their foundations and their very lives’. If price competition is comparable to forcing a door, then innovation is more like bombardment, he proclaims (Schumpeter 1976).
However, to succeed in realizing innovations is difficult, ‘first, because they lie outside of the routine tasks which everybody understands’ and ‘secondly, because the environment resists in many ways that vary, according to social conditions, from simple refusal either to finance or to buy a new thing, to physical attack on the man who tries to produce it’ (Schumpeter 1976). Even though Schumpeter saw that innovation-based competition was becoming institutionalised as ‘technological progress is increasingly becoming the business of teams of trained specialists who turn out what is required and make it work in predictable ways’, he still maintained that the resistance to innovation based on economic interests vested in the established order would never go away (Schumpeter 1976). Accordingly, when considering construction and the production of the built environment in modern societies, he in the same text noted that vested interests and the weight of tradition in a very significant way stifled innovation, representing ‘the great obstacle on the road toward mass production of cheap housing which presupposes radical mechanization and wholesale elimination of inefficient methods of work on the plot’.
As pointed out by Loosemore in Chapter 5 in this volume, a simple linear model of innovation has often dominated thinking about construction innovation in public policy, in academic institutions and in industry organizations and firms. In this linear model, results from scientific research and technological development are supposed to feed into commercial activities and drive industrial development and growth (Stokes 1997). This model of innovation is seen by many as inextricably linked to Schumpeter’s theories and his notion of the entrepreneurial function in capitalist economies (Pavitt 2005). Arguably, this model forms a set of implicit premises when it is contended that the construction industry has a troubled record of innovation for growth and competiveness. This is a recurring theme in the literature on construction. The problem is seen as a lack of willingness to adopt novel results from scientific research and technological development, and even more generally, an inability or unwillingness to learn (e.g. Egan 1998; Lepatner 2007).
Several recent contributions have, however, problematized this view and have pointed out the importance of recognising the varied nature and effects of innovation. For example, in their comprehensive work on the management of innovation, Tidd and Bessant (2013) espouse a process view of innovation, one of ‘turning ideas into reality and capturing value from them’ (p. 21). They see innovation as far more than the generation of new ideas. Innovation also encompasses the need to carefully select the ideas with potential, to implement them and to capture value from them. Process-oriented research on innovation, such as documented in contributions by Van de Ven et al. (1989, 1999), also shows that innovation does not follow linear pathways and is generally marked by ambiguity and discontinuity. Innovation is often very costly in part because organizations have to reframe their approach to reflect the new circumstances that result from the innovation efforts themselves. Beyond this, innovators and those affected by innovation will also learn to anticipate effects. Hence, reflexivity enters into innovation processes, which means that actions and decisions can be understood only contextually and in a temporal framework. All this serves to emphasise the need to consider innovation as a complex phenomenon and to develop alternatives to the simple linear model that has dominated much of the innovation discourse. Much remains before innovation in construction is adequately understood, and so different standpoints and models should be explored in research.
Construction Innovation: Concepts and Controversies
The doubts found in some of the research literature regarding the validity of the broad generalization that construction sector stakeholders are reluctant to innovate and to learn new and efficient ways of building (Winch 2003; Abbott et al. 2007; Whyte and Sexton 2011) does not overshadow the overall impression created by industry experts and policy-makers that it is the culture and/or the structural composition of the industry that explains its reluctance to innovate. This perception is compounded by the sector lagging behind other sectors when measured against traditional innovation metrics (NESTA 2007) and commentaries on innovation found within sector reform reports. The most recent UK report – the Industrial Strategy for Construction (BIS 2013) – suggests that around two-thirds of construction contracting companies fail to innovate. Indeed, aspects of the production of the built environment have been referred to as ‘backwards’ (Woudhuysen and Abley 2004) and parts of it even as ‘degenerate’ (Silber 2007). It may be that since Schumpeter himself made known his views on the challenges of innovation in the construction and building sector, a suspicion has lingered that the industry is in the grips of particular stakeholder interests that uphold the status quo at the expense of the industry as a whole and of society. It would seem, therefore, that significant challenges remain in terms industrial organization and innovation (Manseau and Seaden 2001).
Signs of insufficient performance in the construction sector are not hard to find, with quality and safety problems, numerous bankruptcies and projects often running late and over budget (Flyvebjerg, Bruzelius, and Rothengatter 2003; Williams 2005). Similarly, there are examples of practices that endure virtually unchanged over years in spite of obvious issues with quality and performance and of indications that compliance with minimum quality requirements in building codes is routinely treated as ‘best practice’ by constructors (Orstavik 2014; see also Chapter 6 in the present volume). Still, novel materials, new business models and new ways of designing built objects are emerging, demonstrating that much creative problem solving and local innovation is actually going on in the sector. Also, tangible results of much creative work remains hidden inside projects and fails to translate across other projects and diffuse more widely (Dubois and Gadde 2002; Abbott et al. 2007). As has been pointed out by Slaughter (1993, 1998, 2000), successful innovation requires a deeper consideration of the social and organizational contexts in which it is located. Such complexity renders the evaluation and quantification of innovation in construction difficult, so traditional metrics such as research and development (R&D) expenditure and patent rates are arguably poor proxies for the actuality of innovation in the sector. Also work by both NESTA (Halkett 2007) and Barrett et al. (2007) has suggested that innovations in service provision or microlevel project innovations developed through interactions between construction companies, consultants and clients are often not picked up by others. What emerges here, again, is a highly complex and contested arena both for defining innovation and for establishing appropriate metrics, and one that demands a plurality of different perspectives if it is to be understood within the multiple and diverse contexts that make up the construction sector.
Perspectives on Construction Innovation
In trying to open up a more pluralistic perspective on construction innovation, we have sought to include in this volume contributions that mobilise theoretical frameworks as structuring devices or as lenses necessary to bring forth productive interaction and reflection between differing positions. The point here is that we have sought to avoid privileging any particular position over others, instead making clear that concepts can be understood differently. This being said, there are some important points of departure that underpin the contributions of this text. First, we contend, much as Schumpeter did in his early theory, that innovation should be considered more than a purely economic phenomenon. Second, an essential feature of innovation is that it is maintained through dynamic value creation efforts. In fact, innovation can be defined as humanly created changes in established approaches to value creation. We prefer using the term value creation rather than production, to avoid narrow interpretations of this term. However, the term value creation will often be synonymous with the term production in discussions and theories about innovation. A third underpinning consideration is that value creation invariably concerns human work, combining diverse elements into ‘new combinations’. These are not necessarily ‘things’ in the sense of tangible objects but anything that human beings care to combine into entities because they think these have value of some kind. ‘New combinations’ is, of course, a term also used by Schumpeter, and we agree with Drejer (2004) that there is nothing in Schumpeter’s theories that reduces innovation solely to concerning physical objects or processes related to producing such objects. Thus, innovation is in this volume seen as humanly created changes in established ways of creating value, whatever it is that is made and whatever this value consists of. What is created and consumed does not need to be material, but if we are to speak about innovation, change has to be effected in the way value is created, and this change must be seen by particular stakeholders as meaningful. And it must in some way be lasting (or sticky) because creating a novelty (for instance a technical invention or a novel architectural design for one building) that does not enter into a practice, is not used in other contexts and does not in any way diffuse cannot in itself be innovation. This follows from our definition of innovation itself because it identifies innovation as changes in established ways of value creation. Both the ‘established ways’ and the ‘novel ways’ resulting from innovation are institutionalized and, hence, to some extent lasting (Orstavik 2014). However, and as a matter of course, the timespans for which innovations are actually relevant will vary to a great deal.
Elements of these underpinning characteristics can be traced throughout the contributions contained within this volume and in the way the chapters are organized. Each chapter is intended to provide a different viewpoint on innovation in the built environment and to challenge some conventional way of thinking about construction innovation. Among the most widely diffused common-sense assumptions about innovation is that it is profitable and that the fundamental driving force for innovation is the economic gains that innovation brings. In Chapter 2 on incentives for innovation, Finn Orstavik challenges such assumptions. He argues on the basis of Schumpeter’s perspective on innovation that even though innovation is a decisive factor in competition between firms, innovation is much more than an economic phenomenon for these firms. Actually, innovation is the outcome of actions and decisions that are of a different kind than those recognized as economic and rational. In fact, the gains from innovation are highly uncertain; therefore, innovation is more like a lottery than it is a normal investment in expansion of an existing business. For Orstavik, it is essential to understand reasons for innovative behaviour in construction and therefore not to jump to conclusions about motivations. For example, one should certainly not simply assume that stakeholders are irrational when they decide to avoid investing in innovation. Observers have to ask, rather, what it is with construction that makes it less enticing to play the lottery of innovation there than in other industrial sectors. The answer, Orstavik argues, is found in the ubiquitous presence of asymmetric information in building activities and in the fact that construction production involves the creation of bespoke complex and dynamic systems. The specific form of production dominant in building entails multi-parametric optimization, not limited to the establishment of a novel line of production, but integrated into the actual production operations themselves. The complexity of building operations and design makes multi-parametric optimization essential and unavoidable. This is a fundamental reason that innovation is less appealing in the construction sector than in many other sectors.
Multi-parametric optimization is also at the heart of Kristian Kreiner’s contribution in this book. In Chapter 3, he examines a particular case, a construction project that was aimed at producing the world’s most accessible office building. Considering the value aspect of innovation, Kreiner finds that the aim of this project in itself represented an ambition for carrying out an innovative building project. The innovative content could not, however, be clearly defined in terms of the resulting building being more accessible than any other building. It proved impossible to operationalize this concept because accessibility is multidimensional and it depends to such an extent on the enormous diversity of human wants and needs. The task of creating the world’s most accessible building involved an effort in multi-parametric optimization with no clear solution. What the project did contribute, however, and what was a genuine novelty in the approach to creating value (a new building), was not a new technical system or a new architectural design, but rather the way the building design process was conceptualized. This concerned both the rationale and the modus operandi of the design process. Rather than creating a single, optimal, or nearly optimal design for the building, the solution was to conceive of the building and its users as a ‘living ecology’. Rather than being a fixed structure with assigned meanings, the building was to be seen as a living ecology where meaning would be continually created by the users. In this project, therefore, the essential innovation – if what has been developed is actually carried over into later projects and in this sense is sticky – is the changed way of thinking about design in the design work and in the overall building process. In his fascinating story, Kreiner draws attention to both the inherent difficulties in determining the qualities of a product and the fragility of the conditions that shape the eventual material outcome. He also sensitizes us to the ambiguities that can face us when trying to determine the actual value of an innovation. In this case, what is created is a larger space for human beings to creatively contribute to the making of meaning in their own life worlds in interaction with the material and social realities surrounding us.
These issues resonate across many of the chapters that follow, and not least with the subsequent Chapter 4 by Gonzalo Lizarralde, Mario Bourgault, Nathalie Drouin, and Laurent Viel. In their text, the authors are concerned with what they see as an overly restricted vision of value and of what construction innovation is about in general. A stakeholder perspective on construction innovation is mobilized, and the argument is made that more stakeholders ought to be involved in building and in design. Rather than sticking to a narrow – statistical – understanding of what is to be counted as construction, many more activities have to be considered as relevant. In general, all those involved and affected by innovation in the built environment should be considered stakeholders and ought to have a say in these processes. Also, the value of innovation cannot be considered only in terms of added value and profitability realized by construction firms. A broader understanding of value, resulting from interest articulation and negotiations among stakeholders, is essential for the ability to organize innovation in the built environment in good ways. Also, there is an urgent need to understand that integration champions are essential in innovation in the built environment. Champions are often aiming for quite different things than economic profit. Instead, they are working to integrate stakeholders and facilitate stakeholders’ active involvement and the champions are as such essential both for innovation in the built environment and for our ability to understand what innovation in the built environment and in construction is fundamentally about.
Stakeholder involvement is a theme discussed further by Martin Loosemore in Chapter 5. As mentioned earlier in this introduction, Loosemore questions the linear model of innovation, which he sees lifting its head much too often in discussions about innovation in construction and when the challenges facing the industry are debated. Innovation should not be conceived of solely as an outcome of scientific research and technology development and the discussions about construction innovation should not simply be on the transfer of technology or the ability of firms to learn and their willingness to innovate. Construction firms have to continually renew themselves and their mode of doing business, given the demanding realities of innovation based competition. The source of novelty for this kind of competition is more often than not the creativity and collaborative potential of people doing project work. Loosemore raises the questions to what extent innovation actually can be planned and managed and to what extent innovation is rather an emergent phenomenon originating in the creativity of and the collaboration between those people who are themselves involved in the construction projects. Loosemore proposes to adopt a grassroots perspective on innovation and draws attention to some important recent contributions to innovation theory, amongst others targeting service provision industries and aiming to supersede conventional innovation analyses anchored in a view of economic growth as based on the expansion of efficient volume production of standard products.
The non-linearity of innovation processes is a theme further developed by Carl Abbott, Martin Sexton, and Catherine Barlow in Chapter 6. These authors are also interested in the role of stakeholders in construction and construction innovation and have used a socio-technical network perspective to analyse how decisions are made on adopting sustainability-related innovations, such as micro-generating technology in new build housing. Several case studies have been performed that have given novel insights into the complex ways in which technology, regulation and organizational processes combine to shape the innovation context. In the chapter, an illustration based on one of these case studies is used to show that innovation can be triggered by regulation but that outcomes often do not necessarily reflect ultimate policy objectives in an effective way. The adoption of an innovation is decided through a recursive process of interest articulation and negotiations, and the fundamental impulse for innovation comes from above such as from regulations formulated on the national level. The outcome – the innovation – can end up being a compromise that does not, or only partially, fulfil needs of stakeholders. Policy aims can be stifled and the diffusion of innovation inhibited due to the entirely logical behaviour of actors with misaligned needs.
We have seen that two strikingly diverse perspectives are developed in Chapter 5 and 6. The former proposes a bottom-up view, the latter a top-down perspective on what triggers – or should trigger – innovation in the built environment: grassroots initiatives versus state-imposed regulations. For those feeling the urge for moving towards a synthesis between the two, potentially useful conceptual resources and arguments are found in Chapter 7. Here, the authors Lena Bygballe, Håkan Håkansson and Malena Ingemansson present an industrial network perspective on innovation. They acknowledge the many interdependencies necessary for realising innovation and the involvement of many stakeholders located along the value chains of building. Furthermore, they call attention to the fact that the realities of construction innovation are consistent with the important general point made by Schumpeter (1983) in that resources necessary for innovation most often are committed to entirely other purposes. This means that innovation cannot but be disruptive to some extent, and this nearly always creates significant obstacles. Innovation can be successful only when new or different interfaces are created between technical and organisational resources. Innovation is driven forwards by way of interaction and adaptation processes between actors and their resources. This close interaction involving learning, long-term relationships, and trust is not compatible with basic neoclassical market models, has obvious and important implications for any attempt to formulate effective innovation policy, and for companies’ own structuring of their innovation efforts.
Graeme Larsen further explores the realities networks in construction innovation in Chapter 8. His focus is not so much on the first creation of novelties as it is on the diffusion of innovations, and the transformation of innovation taking place as they are diffused to ever-new firms. Larsen is interested in the large number of small and medium sized constructors in the UK industry, and presents an interpretive analysis of a large data set on network linkages. The data is analysed with the help of social network analysis software, and graphic illustrations provide a rare view into the complex realities of networks that actors in construction are embedded in. Actors are part of dynamic networks through which innovations are shaped, changed and contested over time, albeit not in isolation of the immediate surroundings nor unaffected by broader institutional forces. Networks inside and outside organizations are visualised, hence, the discussion regarding the nature of industrial innovation networks in Chapter 7 is complemented and increases our understanding of just how ubiquitous such networks are. An important policy implication highlighted by the author is that efforts to promote diffusion of innovation must be context specific and localized, rather than based on generic best practice initiatives, if they are to be effective.
Another take on innovation networks and collaboration is developed by Kim Haugbølle, Marianne Forman and Frédéric Bougrain in Chapter 9. Here and similar to Chapter 11 later in this volume, the focus is not on the networks as such, but on the specific role played by clients in the context of innovation. An analysis is presented that details the ways clients can influence innovation – in their role as stakeholders: as producers, as users or as intermediaries. In a similar way as in Chapter 6 that discussed the intricacies of deciding on employing micro-generation technology, the authors of Chapter 9 point out that innovation is realized not by individual people acting on their own, but through complex interactions among actors and technologies that together can be seen as forming dynamic socio-technical systems. Indeed, moving close to the idea of grassroots driven innovation (Chapter 5) regarding the actual sources of innovation, the authors find that clients often are closely involved in innovation development, and they are found to be effective in promoting all kinds of innovation: not only novel products but also innovative processes and organizational and market innovations.
All of the chapters in this volume from Chapter 4 through to Chapter 9 are concerned fundamentally with different types of actors, their role as stakeholders, and the complexities of their linkages and interactions in innovation. Abbott et al. in Chapter 6 concentrate attention on the effects of policies and policy instruments while maintaining the focus on actors. In this way, the authors introduce the institutional arrangements into the analysis in a way that goes beyond the idea that individual actors are integrated in networks.
In Chapter 10, without departing fully from the established track, authors Timothy Rose and Karen Manley emphasize even more than Abbott et al. the significance of institutional arrangements for innovative behaviour and decision making. Rose and Manley’s point of departure is comparable to that also formulated by Larsen in Chapter 8, and by Wamelink and Heintz in Chapter 11: namely, that innovation in construction generally happens through diffusion. In Chapter 10
