Dentofacial and Occlusal Asymmetries -  - E-Book

Dentofacial and Occlusal Asymmetries E-Book

0,0
122,99 €

-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.

Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

Comprehensive and accessible resource that covers all crucial aspects of dentofacial and occlusal asymmetries

Dentofacial and Occlusal Asymmetries covers all crucial aspects of asymmetries encountered in the stomatognathic region regarding diagnosis, treatment planning, management, and prognosis. Divided into three core sections, the first part focuses on the etiology of asymmetry and whether it is congenital or acquired through disease or trauma. The second and third sections go on to discuss localization and management, providing information on topics such as interception, correction, and camouflage. Specific sample topics covered in the book include:

  • Treatment approaches: interceptive, tooth movements, goal-oriented biomechanics, and jaw repositioning
  • Treatment principles: dentofacial orthopedics, camouflage, and orthodontic-surgical treatment
  • Localization and problem list: medical and dental history, clinical examination, dental cast analysis, and radiographic/imaging assessment
  • Medical, social and psychological aspects: growth disorders and helping children and their families with facial differences

Written by a team of renowned experts in the field, Dentofacial and Occlusal Asymmetries will serve as an invaluable resource to postgraduates in orthodontic, pediatric dentistry, and oral and maxillofacial surgery programs as well as orthodontists, pediatric dentists, pediatricians, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons aiming for optimal results in the diagnosis and management of these complex malocclusions and dentofacial deformities.

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern

Seitenzahl: 782

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2024

Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



Table of Contents

Cover

Table of Contents

Title Page

Copyright Page

List of Contributors

1 Introduction

References

Part I: Etiology

2 The Etiology of Dentofacial and Occlusal Asymmetries – An Overview

Introduction

Congenital

Postnatally

References

3 Congenital

3.1 Distortion/Malformation

Etiology – Definition

Craniosynostosis

Plagiocephaly

Muscular Torticollis

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Scoliosis

Hemifacial Hyperplasia

References

3.2 Syndromes and Rare Diseases with Asymmetry in the Craniofacial and Dental Regions

Syndromes and Rare Diseases

Unilateral Overgrowth of Craniofacial or Dental Structures

Unilateral Underdevelopment of Craniofacial or Dental Structures

References

4 Acquired

4.1 Acquired Dentofacial Deformity and Asymmetry

Introduction

The Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) and Its Association with Asymmetric Dentofacial Development

Dental Occlusion and Acquired Skeletal and Dental Asymmetries

Acquired Dentofacial and Dental Asymmetries

Autoimmune Conditions

Skeletal Growth Diseases

Conditions with Skeletal Undergrowth

Conditions with Skeletal Overgrowth

Soft‐tissue Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Conditions

Management of Acquired Dentofacial Deformity and Asymmetry

Conclusion

Acknowledgment

References

Part II: Localization and Problem List

5 Examination of Special Features in Patients with Dentofacial and Occlusal Asymmetries

Introduction

Head Posture

Functional Assessment

Photographic Assessment

Conclusion

References

6 Imaging: Craniofacial Asymmetries

Introduction

Asymmetry

Differential Diagnosis and Decision Tree for a Craniofacial Asymmetry

Imaging for Asymmetry

Analysis

Overall Regional Changes Associated with the Developmental Onset of TMJ Disorders

Common Disorders and Associated Local and Regional Changes

Conclusions

References

7 Cephalometric Radiographic Assessment of Facial Asymmetry

Introduction

Radiographic Methods for Diagnosis of Asymmetry

Concluding Remarks

References

8 EMG and Ultrasonography of Masticatory Muscles

Introduction

Understanding the Functional Profile of the Muscle

Clinical Methods to Record Masticatory Muscles Functional Capacity

Posterior Crossbite with Functional Shift. Effects on Masticatory Muscles?

References

9 Localization and Problem List – 3‐D Face Reconstruction

Introduction

Facial Asymmetry Diagnosis and Complementary Exams for Facial Asymmetry Localization

Image Analysis in CBCT Scans for Skeletal Asymmetry

Head Orientation

Scroll Through All Cross‐Sectional Slices

Assessment of the 3D Rendering Viewing from Different Perspectives

List of Problems in Skeletal Craniofacial Asymmetries Through 3D Assessment

Zygomatic and Maxillary Unilateral Hypertrophy

Sinus and Maxillary Hypoplasia

Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia

Unilateral Condylar Resorption

Craniofacial Macrosomia

Asymmetry Localization and Quantification

Mirroring and Superimposition

Quantification

Determining the Asymmetry Directions

Final Considerations

Acknowledgments

References

Part III: Management

10 Treatment Approaches

10.1 Very Early Treatment of Dentofacial Asymmetries: Why, When, and How?

Introduction

Etiology

Diagnostic Evaluation

Very Early Treatment for Unilateral Posterior Crossbite with Class I, II, III Malocclusion

What if a Class II Subdivision Develops After Early Crossbite Correction?

What About Stability of Very Early Crossbite Correction?

Summary

References

10.2 Tooth Movement and Goal‐oriented Mechanics in the Treatment of Patients Exhibiting Asymmetry

Introduction

Diagnosis – Problem List

Molar Rotation (First Order)

Molar Tipping (Second Order)

Posterior Crossbite (Third Order)

Early Loss of Mandibular Deciduous Canines

Treatment

Correction of Unilateral Molar Rotation

Current Mechanics Used to Correct a Class II Subdivision Malocclusion

Unilateral Tip‐back Mechanics

Conclusion

References

11 Treatment Principles

11-1 Dentofacial Orthopedics in the Management of Hemifacial Microsomia and Nager Syndrome Cases

Introduction

Case Reports

Discussion

Conclusion

References

11.2 Rational Diagnosis and Treatment of Dental Asymmetries

Introduction

Classification of Dental Asymmetries

Diagnosis of Dental Asymmetries

Management of Posterior Dental Asymmetries

Management of Anterior Dental Asymmetries

Conclusions

Acknowledgment

References

12 Orthodontics, Maxillofacial Surgery, and Asymmetries

12.1 Dental Arch Shape in Relation to Class II Subdivision Malocclusion

Introduction

Dental Arch Form

Case 1

Case 2

Discussion

References

12.2 Asymmetric Application of Lingual Arches

Introduction

Color Code of the Wire and Force System

Shape‐driven Concept

Force‐driven Concept and Definition of Shapes

Unilateral Expansion

Unilateral Tip‐back and Unilateral Tip‐forward

Summary

References

12.3 Skeletal Anchorage for the Correction of the Canted Occlusal Plane

Treatment of the Canted Occlusal Plane

Biomechanics for the Correction of the Canted Occlusal Plane

The Trans‐Palatal Arch (TPA) Plus Hooks

Details of TPA Plus Hooks

The Propeller

The Ulysses and the Anka‐Jorge Plate

Extrusion

Conclusion

References

12.4 Managing the Class II Subdivision Malocclusion with ExtractionCamouflage: Case Reports

Introduction

Case 1

Case 2

Conclusions

References

12.5 The Use of Aligners for Correction of Asymmetries

Introduction

Dental Corrections (Non‐extraction Therapies)

Dental Corrections (Extraction Therapies)

Skeletal Anchorage Therapies

Surgical Intervention

Conclusions

References

12.6 TMJ Conditions Causing Facial Asymmetry: Diagnosis and Treatment

Introduction

Overdevelopment

Unilateral Facial Under‐development

Adolescent Internal Condylar Resorption (AICR)

Reactive Arthritis

Trauma

TMJ Ankylosis

Hemifacial Microsomia (HFM)

Connective Tissue/Autoimmune Diseases (CT/AI)

References

12.7 Distraction Osteogenesis in Maxillofacial Surgery

Introduction

Biological Basis

Staging of Distraction Osteogenesis

Indications for Distraction Osteogenesis

The Distractors and Their Function

Preoperative Patient Evaluation

Surgical Procedure

Postoperative Procedure – Activation of the Device

Complications

Orthodontic Collaboration

Distraction Osteogenesis and/or Conventional Orthognathic Surgery

Conclusion

References

12.8 Maxillo‐mandibular Growth in Hemifacial (or Craniofacial) Microsomia

Introduction – Clinical Appearance

Craniofacial Growth in Hemifacial Microsomia

Long‐term Growth After Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible

Long‐term Results After Costochondral Graft in Growing Patients with Hemifacial Microsomia

Clinical and Prognostic Differences in the Orthopedic and Surgical Treatment of Hemimandibular Hypoplasia in Hemifacial Microsomia versus Pseudo‐hemifacial Microsomia (or Condylar Coronoid Collapse Deformity)

References

12.9 Special Treatment Considerations of Face Asymmetries

Introduction

Diagnosis

Categories of Asymmetry

Special Treatment Considerations

References

12.10 The Vertical Component of Asymmetry: Etiology and Treatment

The Three‐dimensional Nature of Asymmetry

Interaction between Maxillary and Mandibular Asymmetries

Unimaxillary Vertical Asymmetry not Affecting the Symmetry of the Other Jaw

Conclusion

References

12.11 Helping Children and Their Families with Facial Differences – Patient Centered Outcomes and Experiences

Introduction

The Face as a Functional Structure and as an Element of Identity

The Facial Difference from the Patient's Perspective

The Facial Difference from the Family Perspective

Psychosocial Support for Children and Families

References

Index

End User License Agreement

List of Tables

Chapter 3-2

Table 3.2.1 Overview of conditions included in the chapter.

Chapter 4-1

Table 4.1.1 Contributing factors with an impact on the development of denta...

Table 4.1.2 Etiological conditions that may cause dentofacial deformity and...

Chapter 9

Table 9.1 Quantification values of positional and regional asymmetry of the...

Chapter 12-4

Table 12.4.1 Pre‐treatment cephalometric values of case 1.

Table 12.4.2 Pre‐ and post‐treatment cephalometric values of case 1.

Table 12.4.3 Pre‐treatment cephalometric values of case 2.

Table 12.4.4 Pre‐ and post‐treatment cephalometric values of case 2.

Chapter 12-10

Table 12.10.1 Vertical differences (mm) between right and left sides at the...

Table 12.10.2 Difference between mandibular corpus lengths in younger and o...

Table 12.10.3 Correlations among measurements of heights at the level of th...

List of Illustrations

Chapter 1

Figure 1.1 Vitruvian Man drawn by Leonardo Da Vinci in 1492 demonstrating th...

Figure 1.2 Three images where the right face is composed of two right sides,...

Chapter 2

Figure 2.1 Asymmetric anterior open bite generated by prolonged thumb suckin...

Figure 2.2 Twelve‐year‐old girl referred for treatment of maxillary space de...

Figure 2.3 (a–c) Radiographs of a patient who days after a trauma detected a...

Figure 2.4 (a–b) Extraoral and intraoral images of a patient that had experi...

Figure 2.5 Result of a straight‐wire treatment with unilateral Class II elas...

Figure 2.6 (a) Plaster model of a patient with a canine with high labial pos...

Figure 2.7 A patient who has been treated with a straight‐wire appliance.

Chapter 3-2

Figure 3.2.1 Boy 9, 3 years of age with congenital infiltrating lipomatosis ...

Figure 3.2.2 A boy, 10.5 years of age with segmental odontodysplasia (SOD). ...

Figure 3.2.3 Clinical photos of a 16‐year‐old girl with Klippel–Weber–Trenau...

Figure 3.2.4 14‐year‐old female with focal dermal hypoplasia (FDH). (a) En f...

Figure 3.2.5 Boy (5 years of age) with incontinentia pigmentia (IP) and with...

Figure 3.2.6 Female with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED), 10 years o...

Figure 3.2.7 Male 18 years old with regional odontodysplasia. (a—d) Clinical...

Figure 3.2.8 Male with agenesis of all mandibular teeth in left side. (a) In...

Chapter 4-1

Figure 4.1.1 Normal and abnormal mandibular growth and development. Interpla...

Figure 4.1.2 From temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis to malocclusion in...

Figure 4.1.3 Autoimmune condition. A 10‐year‐old girl with juvenile idiopath...

Figure 4.1.4 Scleroderma. Patient with facially localized scleroderma and le...

Figure 4.1.5 Hemifacial hyperplasia, (a) asymmetric mandible, longer ramus a...

Figure 4.1.6 Soft‐tissue condition (Tumor). A 17‐year‐old boy diagnosed with...

Figure 4.1.7 Distraction splint treatment of unilateral TMJ involvement in s...

Figure 4.1.8 Surgical distraction osteogenesis. (a) Correction of dentofacia...

Figure 4.1.9 Unilateral surgical distraction osteogenesis (DO). DO: A 17‐yea...

Chapter 5

Figure 5.1 Collection of children, adolescent, and adult patients with face ...

Figure 5.2 (a) Patient with a torticollis where the cervical muscle is contr...

Figure 5.3 Patient with a torticollis with mild face asymmetry as appears in...

Figure 5.4 (a) Patient with Sprengel’s deformity which influences the inclin...

Figure 5.5 (a) Radiograph of the column of a young boy; (b) the scoliosis in...

Figure 5.6 (a) An 8‐year‐old girl with a functional displacement of the mand...

Figure 5.7 Right canine crossbite developed during the mixed dentition as a ...

Figure 5.8 Differential diagnosis in midline discrepancies. Opening and clos...

Figure 5.9 Asymmetry in bicondylar position is correlated with the occlusal ...

Figure 5.10 (a) Adult patient suffering from a forced bite; (b) when opening...

Figure 5.11 Pronounced deviation of the mandible to the left during maximal ...

Figure 5.12 (a) Frontal image of a skull from the 15

th

century. It can be se...

Figure 5.13 A 9‐year‐old girl with hemifacial microsomia and with ear and so...

Figure 5.14 Photos taken at the three planes of space indicated in the corners of the...

Figure 5.15 A 8‐year‐old girl with Goldenhar syndrome with extra‐oral and in...

Figure 5.16 Extra‐oral and intra‐oral photographs of an 11‐year‐old girl wit...

Figure 5.17 A CBCT image of a 17‐year‐old female with face asymmetry due to ...

Chapter 6

Figure 6.1

DDx

. This table illustrates a differential diagnosis and decision...

Figure 6.2

Cartesian co‐ordinates (6 DOF)

: The orientation process all...

Figure 6.3

Asymmetry features

: oriented and rendered CBCT volume of a 14 yea...

Figure 6.4

Progressive condylar resorption

(Alsabban et al. 2018; Dahl Krist...

Figure 6.5

Condylar hypoplasia

: oriented and rendered CBCT volume of a 15‐ye...

Figure 6.6

Hemifacial microsomia

: oriented and rendered CBCT volume of a 7.6...

Figure 6.7

Condylar hyperplasia

: oriented and rendered CBCT volume of an adu...

Figure 6.8

Hemimandibular elongation

: oriented and rendered CBCT images of a...

Figure 6.9

Osteochondroma

: oriented and rendered CBCT images of 31‐year‐old ...

Chapter 7

Figure 7.1 Structures and landmarks of the posteroanterior radiograph. 1, Mo...

Figure 7.2 Angular and linear measurements from the posteroanterior radiogra...

Figure 7.3 Structures and landmarks of submentovertex radiograph. 1, Metalli...

Figure 7.4 Measurements from the submentovertex radiograph. Mandibular coord...

Figure 7.5 Treatment of a Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3‐premolar ...

Figure 7.6 Treatment of a Class II subdivision malocclusion with 1‐premolar ...

Figure 7.7 Treatment of a Class III subdivision malocclusion with 3‐premolar...

Chapter 8

Figure 8.1 Transverse ultrasound scan of the masseter. The wide white shadow...

Chapter 9

Figure 9.1 Schematic illustration of the rotational descriptors known as pit...

Figure 9.2 Facial photographs of a female patient with facial asymmetry. Not...

Figure 9.3 Head position in a coronal view of the scan and in the 3D model i...

Figure 9.4 Illustration of an orientated rendering skull with the Frankfurt ...

Figure 9.5 Axial, coronal, and sagittal slices with vertical red line fixed ...

Figure 9.6 Coronal, axial, and sagittal views in different slices (a–d). Cor...

Figure 9.7 Rendered skull in different views. (a) Frontal view of the skull ...

Figure 9.8 Three‐dimensional model derived from a CBCT full face scan of a p...

Figure 9.9 Patient presenting with sinus and maxillary hypoplasia in the lef...

Figure 9.10 Axial slice of a CBCT scan from a patient with sinus and maxilla...

Figure 9.11 Patient presenting with facial asymmetry caused by left mandibul...

Figure 9.12 A follow‐up of male patient with facial asymmetry. At 12 years o...

Figure 9.13 Planar scintigraphy image of the patient shown in Figure 9.12, p...

Figure 9.14 3D mandibular model of a patient with facial asymmetry and osteo...

Figure 9.15 Patient with facial asymmetry and history of mandibular trauma a...

Figure 9.16 3D craniofacial reconstruction of three young patients with cran...

Figure 9.17 Flowchart for the image analysis steps in asymmetry cases.

Figure 9.18 Original (yellow) and mirrored (white) 3D models. Superimposed m...

Figure 9.19 Original (Or, yellow) and mirrored (Mir, white) 3D models showin...

Figure 9.20 3D models showing the landmarks and reference planes for asymmet...

Chapter 10-1

Figure 10.1.1 Unilateral posterior crossbite on the right with concomitant l...

Figure 10.1.2 (a) and (b) In very young children, a UPC causes only an asymm...

Figure 10.1.3 (a)–(c) In 80% of children in the pure deciduous or early mixe...

Figure 10.1.4 (a) and (b) If the midline deviation upon opening disappears, ...

Figure 10.1.5 (a) and (b) In these patients, a cant of the lower anterior oc...

Figure 10.1.6 (a)–(c) Single tooth crossbite correction with 6 weeks of cris...

Figure 10.1.7 (a)–(e) Lower facial asymmetry due to a UPC on the left with f...

Figure 10.1.8 (a) and (b) One daily activation of the rapid maxillary expand...

Figure 10.1.9 (a)–(d) After 6 months of stabilization, the RPE was removed. ...

Figure 10.1.10 (a)–(d) Ten years later, very early crossbite correction has ...

Figure 10.1.11 (a)–(e) The right UPC causes a chin deviation to the right si...

Figure 10.1.12 (a)–(c) Despite rapid maxillary expansion, the mandible did n...

Figure 10.1.13 (a)–(c) A “box” criss‐cross elastic helps to guide the mandib...

Figure 10.1.14 (a)–(d) Successful early crossbite correction without any nee...

Figure 10.1.15 (a)–(e) Mild Class III traits with left UPC and noticeable lo...

Figure 10.1.16 (a)–(c) Rapid maxillary expansion followed by application of ...

Figure 10.1.17 (a)–(j) Bilateral Class III elastics to counteract the Class ...

Figure 10.1.18 (a)–(f) Anterolateral crossbite on the right side due to a fu...

Figure 10.1.19 (a)–(d) Rapid maxillary expansion for 4 weeks followed by 6 m...

Figure 10.1.20 (a)–(f) No further treatment is necessary. The second deciduo...

Figure 10.1.21 (a)–(e) A 4 1/2‐year‐old girl with UPC on the right in combin...

Figure 10.1.22 (a) and (b) Before and after 6 weeks of rapid maxillary expan...

Figure 10.1.23 (a)–(c) Rapid maxillary expansion with Class II elastic on th...

Figure 10.1.24 (a)–(c) Five months later, the UPC on the right side has been...

Figure 10.1.25 (a) and (b) Note the positive effect of crossbite and Class I...

Figure 10.1.26 (a)–(c) Good overall maintainability of the very early correc...

Figure 10.1.27 (a)–(e) Right UPC combined with a Class II malocclusion a den...

Figure 10.1.28 (a)–(d) Rapid maxillary expansion for 6 months followed by 9 ...

Figure 10.1.29 (a)–(e) The same patient 5 years later. Very early treatment ...

Figure 10.1.30 (a)–(c) At 6 years of age, a UPC on the right side with a low...

Figure 10.1.31 (a)–(c) After rapid maxillary expansion the UPC is corrected ...

Figure 10.1.32 (a)–(d) One year later, a Class II subdivision malocclusion o...

Figure 10.1.33 (a)–(d) Coincident midlines upon opening after a second 8‐mon...

Figure 10.1.34 (a)–(d) Apart from the positive effect on the lower facial as...

Chapter 10-2

Figure 10.2.1 (a) Frontal facial view of patient with hemifacial macrosomia....

Figure 10.2.2 (a) Frontal view of patient with asymmetry due to unilateral m...

Figure 10.2.3 Bite stick in place to demonstrate canting of the occlusal pla...

Figure 10.2.4 (a) Frontal view of patient with asymmetry associated with rig...

Figure 10.2.5 Corrected axis tomogram of left condyle revealing obliteration...

Figure 10.2.6 (a, b) Panoramic radiograph (a) and frontal cephalogram (b) of...

Figure 10.2.7 (a) Frontal view of a patient with a mandibular asymmetry due ...

Figure 10.2.8 (a) Frontal view of a Class II subdivision malocclusion in the...

Figure 10.2.9 (a) An efficient way to assess molar rotation by tracing a lin...

Figure 10.2.10 Assessment of the mesio‐distal axial inclination of the molar...

Figure 10.2.11 Evaluation of the bucco‐lingual axial inclination of the mola...

Figure 10.2.12 (a) Clinical example showing a dental midline discrepancy due...

Figure 10.2.13 Equilibrium diagram generated when a molar is rotated unilate...

Figure 10.2.14 Force system generated in the sagittal plane. As the right mo...

Figure 10.2.15 Force system generated by Class II elastics on a continuous a...

Figure 10.2.16 Frontal view. Unilateral Class II elastic wear creates a cant...

Figure 10.2.17 When unilateral Class II elastic is used with coil springs as...

Figure 10.2.18 Application of an intrusive force unilaterally will result in...

Figure 10.2.19 Jasper Jumper in place for Class II correction. Points of att...

Figure 10.2.20 Force system delivered by the Jasper Jumper. The molar will n...

Figure 10.2.21 Occlusal view of both the maxillary and mandibular dental arc...

Figure 10.2.22 Frontal view of the mandibular arch. The effect of the unilat...

Figure 10.2.23 Shamy appliance with a unilateral tip‐back spring on the righ...

Figure 10.2.24 Pendulum appliance which can be used for unilateral or bilate...

Figure 10.2.25 The desired force system necessary to achieve a unilateral mo...

Figure 10.2.26 Force system generated when a unilateral tip‐back moment is a...

Figure 10.2.27 Schematic representation of a three piece base arch.

Figure 10.2.28 Force system developed when a transpalatal arch with a second...

Figure 10.2.29 (a–c) Pretreatment views of the right and left buccal occlusi...

Chapter 11-1

Figure 11.1.1 (a–d) A 4‐year‐old female patient diagnosed with a hemifacial...

Figure 11.1.2 The principle with the use of a functional appliance with a co...

Figure 11.1.3 The approach applied in the treatment by means of a splint tha...

Figure 11.1.4 (a) The clinical examination revealed a boy with an asymmetric...

Figure 11.1.5 (a) The panoramic radiograph of the male patient with Nager sy...

Figure 11.1.6 (a) The surgical distraction for elongation of the ramus in ad...

Chapter 11-2

Figure 11.2.1 An extra‐oral clinical examination utilizing the interpupillar...

Figure 11.2.2 A clinical examination can be performed by looking from inferi...

Figure 11.2.3 A straight instrument or piece of floss placed in line with th...

Figure 11.2.4 The presence of an occlusal cant assessed by asking the patien...

Figure 11.2.5 Examination of dental midline asymmetry.

Figure 11.2.6 Asymmetry of dental arches evaluation.

Figure 11.2.7 Panoramic radiographic examination.

Figure 11.2.8 Identification of mandibular asymmetry on a lateral cephalomet...

Figure 11.2.9 Frontal cephalometric evaluation.

Figure 11.2.10 3D cephalometric analysis.

Figure 11.2.11 Occlusal asymmetry with mesial‐in rotation of the maxillary f...

Figure 11.2.12 A Class II malocclusion case in which the upper first molars ...

Figure 11.2.13 Tipping of the maxillary first molar is a common problem asso...

Figure 11.2.14 Orthodontic appliances are used to tip back the molar and reg...

Figure 11.2.15 A case in which an upper removable appliance can be used in c...

Figure 11.2.16 Asymmetry management and malocclusion correction.

Figure 11.2.17 The use of unilateral Class II elastics may lead to extrusion...

Figure 11.2.18 A traditional J‐hook or TAD can be used to mitigate this effe...

Figure 11.2.19 A J‐hook headgear is used in addition to a unilateral Class I...

Figure 11.2.20 To avoid Class II elastics use, and prevent proclining the lo...

Figure 11.2.21 Space closure management using closing loops, tiebacks, and d...

Figure 11.2.22 A case in which extractions were performed, and the lower spa...

Figure 11.2.23 Skeletal and dental crossbites can be distinguished based on ...

Figure 11.2.24 Rapid palatal expansion can be utilized to expand and split t...

Figure 11.2.25 A case of maxillary constriction treated using rapid palatal ...

Figure 11.2.26 Dental midline deviations may present in a few ways: (1) only...

Figure 11.2.27 The axial inclination of the anterior teeth may also be a cau...

Figure 11.2.28 The use of extractions and proper bracket positioning to corr...

Figure 11.2.29 Asymmetrical space closure using closing loops is an excellen...

Figure 11.2.30 A patient in which asymmetrical space closure was used to cen...

Figure 11.2.31 Asymmetric mechanics are required to treat asymmetrical probl...

Figure 11.2.32 A case in which TADs were used to correct upper midline devia...

Figure 11.2.33 Asymmetrical use of J‐hooks for malocclusion management, midl...

Figure 11.2.34 Moving each tooth separately, using sequentially activated op...

Figure 11.2.35 A case where asymmetrical rotational control is applied to co...

Figure 11.2.36 The “Yin‐Yang” archwire consists of a curve of Spee on one si...

Figure 11.2.37 A case in which asymmetrical extractions were performed to co...

Chapter 12-1

Figure 12.1.1 Patient presenting with a Class II subdivision malocclusion wi...

Figure 12.1.2 (a–e) Intra‐oral images illustrating the presence of a maxilla...

Figure 12.1.3 Combined tracing of the lateral cephalogram and the occlusogra...

Figure 12.1.4 (a–c) Distal movement of the right upper canine being performe...

Figure 12.1.5 (a–e) The retraction of the maxillary right canine into a Clas...

Figure 12.1.6 (a–e) A step was introduced to a 0.017 × 0.025‐inch stainless ...

Figure 12.1.7 (a–e) Finishing wires in place.

Figure 12.1.8 Smiling photograph illustrating coincidence of the maxillary a...

Figure 12.1.9 (a–e) Treated outcome at 5‐year follow‐up. Class I incisor rel...

Figure 12.1.10 Patient presenting with a Class II subdivision malocclusion w...

Figure 12.1.11 (a–e) Intra‐oral photographs highlighting crowding of the ant...

Figure 12.1.12 (a) As in Case 1, asymmetric extraction of a maxillary first ...

Figure 12.1.13 (a–c) The maxillary left canine was retracted to a Class I po...

Figure 12.1.14 (a–d) Following space closure, both upper and lower arch were...

Figure 12.1.15 (a–d) Power arms extending from the right side were applied t...

Figure 12.1.16 (a–d) The transpalatal arch was asymmetrically activated with...

Figure 12.1.17 (a–d) Regeneration of arch symmetry with Class I canines and ...

Figure 12.1.18 (a–e) Final occlusal outcome with well‐aligned arches, midlin...

Figure 12.1.19 Smiling photograph illustrating midline coincidence and symme...

Chapter 12-2

Figure 12.2.1 Lingual arch designs for unilateral expansion based on shape‐d...

Figure 12.2.2 Various force systems for unilateral expansion. (a) Single for...

Figure 12.2.3 The passive shape of a lingual arch. (a) Occlusal view; (b) fr...

Figure 12.2.4 Simulation of deactivation force system. Passive shape (green ...

Figure 12.2.5 Deactivated shape. (a) Deactivated shape is fabricated exactly...

Figure 12.2.6 Activated shape. (a) Before activation (green color), After ac...

Figure 12.2.7 (a) and (b) A patient with a severely lingually tipped mandibu...

Figure 12.2.8 Various force diagrams. (a) Equal and opposite forces. This is...

Figure 12.2.9 Unilateral tip back and tip forward lingual arch. (a) Passive ...

Figure 12.2.10 (a) Passive shape; (b) deactivated shape; (c) activated shape...

Figure 12.2.11 (a) and (b) A patient with Class I molar relationship on the ...

Chapter 12-3

Figure 12.3.1 Diagrammatic presentation of the envelope of discrepancy in th...

Figure 12.3.2 The deviated directions of maxilla and mandible that affect bo...

Figure 12.3.3 To correct the canted occlusal plane all four quadrants of pos...

Figure 12.3.4 Landmarks of the Grummons frontal cephalometric analysis: Ag, ...

Figure 12.3.5 Un‐face assessment of face asymmetry and evaluation of the can...

Figure 12.3.6 The 3‐D reconstruction and CBCT sections show the deviated nas...

Figure 12.3.7 When the temporal bones are asymmetrical then, as a result, th...

Figure 12.3.8 MRI examination reveals an anterior disc displacement of the r...

Figure 12.3.9 Un‐face facial photograph.

Figure 12.3.10 (a)–(e) The upper second molar lingual cusps caused occlusal ...

Figure 12.3.11 (a)–(c) Intraoral photographs taken during the course of trea...

Figure 12.3.12 Frontal cephalometric radiographs taken before the start (a) ...

Figure 12.3.13 Comparison of the initial occlusal plane with the one after t...

Figure 12.3.14 (a)–(c) Intraoral photographs taken after the treatment.

Figure 12.3.15 The TPA plus hooks with the Benefit plate integrated into the...

Figure 12.3.16 By observing the maxillary wall from the occlusal view, the o...

Figure 12.3.17 The lateral aspect of the radiograph shows that the nasal flo...

Figure 12.3.18 (a) and (b) In the mandible, the intermolar width will increa...

Figure 12.3.19 The TPA plus hooks appliance.

Figure 12.3.20 Configuration of the TPA plus hooks system combined with the ...

Figure 12.3.21 Configuration of the TPA plus hooks system for distalization ...

Figure 12.3.22 The Center of Resistance of the maxilla is different from the...

Figure 12.3.23 (a) and (b) Female patient with canted occlusal plane before ...

Figure 12.3.24 (a)–(f) Pretreatment intraoral photographs show a malocclusio...

Figure 12.3.25 (a) Pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiograph (the black ...

Figure 12.3.26 Pretreatment panoramic radiograph shows the impaction of the ...

Figure 12.3.27 (a) and (b) Views of the biomechanics with upper lingual appl...

Figure 12.3.28 (a) and (b) Lateral right view from a panoramic radiograph an...

Figure 12.3.29 (a) and (b) Intraoral occlusal photographs of the maxilla wit...

Figure 12.3.30 (a) and (b) Pretreatment and posttreatment photographs showin...

Figure 12.3.31 The en‐masse retraction in the mandible was done by engaging ...

Figure 12.3.32 (a)–(d) Posttreatment intraoral photographs.

Figure 12.3.33 Intraoral photograph 2 years after retention.

Figure 12.3.34 (a)–(c) The frontal cephalometric radiographs taken before th...

Figure 12.3.35 The entire Propeller (top) and its components.

Figure 12.3.36 The anterior TAD was placed between the left canine and the l...

Figure 12.3.37 Dental arch form correction by connecting the premolar area o...

Figure 12.3.38 (a)–(c) The horizontal use of the Propeller is shown in the l...

Figure 12.3.39 The vertical use of the Propeller can be utilized on the prem...

Figure 12.3.40 (a)–(f) The case is a male, age 11Y10M, with complaint of upp...

Figure 12.3.41 The bite jumping appliance Forsus has been used to correct th...

Figure 12.3.42 (a) and (b) A TPA with hooks was constructed on the palate to...

Figure 12.3.43 The use of the Propeller after the removal of Forsus is neces...

Figure 12.3.44 (a) and (b) Posttreatment intraoral photographs.

Figure 12.3.45 Superimposition of the lateral cephalometric tracings (black ...

Figure 12.3.46 (a)–(c) The frontal cephalometric radiographs taken before th...

Figure 12.3.47 Extraoral frontal photographs presenting the significantly im...

Figure 12.3.48 (a)–(c) The Ulysses wire when is placed on the mandible.

Figure 12.3.49 The Anka‐Jorge plate.

Figure 12.3.50 The Anka‐Jorge plate placed in the zygomatic buttress for con...

Figure 12.3.51 (a)–(c) Patient has a bruxism habit resulting to a flattening...

Figure 12.3.52 (a) and (b) Intraoral photographs of occlusal views show the ...

Figure 12.3.53 (a)–(d) Extraoral profile and un‐face photographs showing the...

Figure 12.3.54 (a)–(c) The auxiliaries used with the Anka‐Jorge plate are mo...

Figure 12.3.55 (a)–(c) Posttreatment extraoral photographs.

Figure 12.3.56 (a)–(d) Lateral cephalometric tracing superimposition 6 month...

Figure 12.3.57 (a) and (b) For better vertical control a finger spring (elev...

Figure 12.3.58 A single spring (elevator spring) can be used in selected cas...

Figure 12.3.59 (a) and (b) Pretreatment and progress frontal photographs sho...

Figure 12.3.60 (a)–(d) Pretreatment and progress intraoral photographs showi...

Figure 12.3.61 (a) and (b) Pretreatment and progress profile photographs sho...

Figure 12.3.62 (a) and (b) Pretreatment and progress frontal cephalometric t...

Figure 12.3.63 Lingual fixed orthodontic appliance combined with the spring ...

Figure 12.3.64 (a) and (b) Pretreatment and progress un‐face photographs aft...

Figure 12.3.65 (a) and (b) Left and right arms of the TPA are hooked the ele...

Figure 12.3.66 (a) and (b) Pretreatment (yellow color line of occlusal plane...

Figure 12.3.67 Superimposition of pretreatment (black line) and progress aft...

Figure 12.3.68 (a) and (b) Pretreatment and progress after the use of elevat...

Chapter 12-4

Figure 12.4.1 (a–h) Pre‐treatment photographs of case 1. The subdivision rig...

Figure 12.4.2 Pre‐treatment panoramic radiograph.

Figure 12.4.3 Pre‐treatment lateral cephalometric radiograph displaying mild...

Figure 12.4.4 (a–c) Levelling and alignment phase following extractions of t...

Figure 12.4.5 (a–c) Working phase with stainless steel wires and monolateral...

Figure 12.4.6 (a–h) Post‐treatment photographs of case 1 displaying bilatera...

Figure 12.4.7 Post‐treatment panoramic radiograph.

Figure 12.4.8 Post‐treatment lateral cephalometric radiograph.

Figure 12.4.9 (a–f) Post‐retention records displaying stability 2 years post...

Figure 12.4.10 (a–h) Pre‐treatment photographs of case 2. The subdivision ri...

Figure 12.4.11 Pre‐treatment panoramic radiograph. The previous loss of toot...

Figure 12.4.12 Pre‐treatment lateral cephalometric radiograph displaying sev...

Figure 12.4.13 (a–c) Working phase. The three orthodontic miniscrews are ins...

Figure 12.4.14 (a–c) Working phase. The end of the space closure phase (the ...

Figure 12.4.15 (a–c) Finishing phase following miniscrews removal in the max...

Figure 12.4.16 (a–h) Post‐treatment photographs of case 2 displaying a well‐...

Figure 12.4.17 (a, b). Post‐treatment photographs of spontaneous lip compete...

Figure 12.4.18 Post‐treatment panoramic radiograph.

Figure 12.4.19 Post‐treatment lateral cephalometric radiograph.

Chapter 12-5

Figure 12.5.1 (a) Pre‐treatment images of a child in mixed dentition showing...

Figure 12.5.2 (a) Pre‐treatment images of a teenager with a congenitally mis...

Figure 12.5.3 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical C...

Figure 12.5.4 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical C...

Figure 12.5.5 (a) Pre‐treatment Images of an adult showing a missing #12 con...

Figure 12.5.6 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical C...

Figure 12.5.7 (a) Pre‐treatment images of a teenager showing an asymmetrical...

Figure 12.5.8 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical C...

Figure 12.5.9 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical C...

Figure 12.5.10 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical ...

Figure 12.5.11 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical ...

Figure 12.5.12 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical ...

Figure 12.5.13 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical ...

Figure 12.5.14 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing a Class II denta...

Figure 12.5.15 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical ...

Figure 12.5.16 (a) Pre‐treatment images of an adult showing an asymmetrical ...

Chapter 12-6

Figure 12.6.1 Case 1. (a–c) A 14‐year‐old female presents with condylar hype...

Figure 12.6.2 Case 1. (a–c) Presurgery occlusion views showing mandibular de...

Figure 12.6.3 Case 1. (a) Cephalometric analysis shows a Class III skeletal ...

Figure 12.6.4 Case 2. (a, b) An 18‐year‐old female with significant vertical...

Figure 12.6.5 Case 2. (a–c) Presurgery occlusion shows mandibular dental mid...

Figure 12.6.6 Case 2. (a) Presurgical cephalometric analysis shows the extre...

Figure 12.6.7 Case 2. (a) MRI shows the vertical and anteroposterior enlarge...

Figure 12.6.8 Case 3. (a–c) A 16‐year‐old female (TMJ onset at age 12 years)...

Figure 12.6.9 Case 3. (a–c) Presurgery occlusion shows mandibular dental mid...

Figure 12.6.10 Case 3. (a) Cephalometric tracing shows a retruded mandible, ...

Figure 12.6.11 Case 4. (a–c) An 18‐year‐old male sustained a unilateral disp...

Figure 12.6.12 Case 4. (a–c) Presurgery occlusion demonstrates a transverse ...

Figure 12.6.13 Case 4. (a) Presurgical cephalometric analysis demonstrates a...

Figure 12.6.14 Case 5. (a–c) This 14‐year‐old female was born with left‐side...

Figure 12.6.15 Case 5. (a–c) Presurgery occlusion has a transverse cant, lef...

Figure 12.6.16 Case 5. (a) Cephalometric analysis demonstrates the retruded ...

Figure 12.6.17 Case 6. (a–c) A 16‐year‐old female with bilateral TMJ juvenil...

Figure 12.6.18 Case 6. (a–c) The occlusion demonstrates asymmetry with the m...

Figure 12.6.19 Case 6. (a) Cephalometric analysis shows the vertical differe...

Chapter 12-7

Figure 12.7.1 Girl 11 years old with rheumatoid arthritis affecting the righ...

Figure 12.7.2 Boy 5 years old with facial asymmetry due to Goldenhar syndrom...

Figure 12.7.3 Boy 5 years old with mandibular hypoplasia due to severe traum...

Figure 12.7.4 Boy 6 months old with excessive micrognathia due to P. Robin s...

Figure 12.7.5 Boy 13 years old with severe upper micrognathia. (a) Intraoral...

Chapter 12-8

Figure 12.8.1 Patient affected by an HFM with mandibular deformity Type I: t...

Figure 12.8.2 Nontreated female patient affected by HFM type III. Frontal fa...

Figure 12.8.3 Male patient affected by HFM IIb treated with early DO: fronta...

Figure 12.8.4 Nontreated female patient affected by hemifacial microsomia ty...

Figure 12.8.5 Male patient affected by HFM type III treated with early CCG: ...

Figure 12.8.6 Male patient affected by HFM. Frontal photograph of the patien...

Figure 12.8.7 Male patient mislabeled as HFM, treated with unilateral mandib...

Figure 12.8.8 Male patient mislabeled as HFM, treated with an asymmetrical f...

Figure 12.8.9 Female patient correctly diagnosed as CCC deformity treated wi...

Chapter 12-9

Figure 12.9.1 Everything that is oblique is underestimated in the lateral vi...

Figure 12.9.2 The University of Milan cephalometric analysis on CBTC includi...

Figure 12.9.3 Dentofacial deformity with the discrepancy on one plane.

Figure 12.9.4 Dentofacial deformity with the discrepancy on two planes.

Figure 12.9.5 Dentofacial deformity with the discrepancy on three planes.

Figure 12.9.6 (a) A clinical case with impaired transverse and vertical deve...

Figure 12.9.7 (a) A patient presenting oral respiration with transversal hyp...

Figure 12.9.8 (a) Unilateral fracture of the mandibular condyle passed unnot...

Figure 12.9.9 (a) Left condylar fracture with left joint function restricted...

Figure 12.9.10 (a) Patient with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: distal positi...

Figure 12.9.11 (a) Patient with Binder syndrome; (b) correction of the midli...

Figure 12.9.12 (a) Altered mandibular position due to occlusal interference;...

Figure 12.9.13 (a) Skeletal discrepancy on one plane. The mandible is displa...

Figure 12.9.14 (a) Skeletal discrepancy on two planes; (b) the final result ...

Figure 12.9.15 (a) Skeletal discrepancy on three planes; (b) the final resul...

Figure 12.9.16 (a) Skeletal discrepancy on three planes; (b) the final resul...

Chapter 12-10

Figure 12.10.1 Facial photographs (a, b) and posteroanterior cephalometric r...

Figure 12.10.2 Hemifacial microsomia in a boy before treatment (a) with a fu...

Figure 12.10.3 Posteroanterior cephalometric images of children aged 8 years...

Figure 12.10.4 Vertical and horizontal asymmetry over time in unilateral cle...

Figure 12.10.5 Patients with VMA. Horizontal lines on facial photographs ind...

Figure 12.10.6 VMA in a 19‐year‐old woman. (a) Frontal facial photograph, di...

Figure 12.10.7 (a) Frontal facial photograph reveals differential occlusal l...

Figure 12.10.8 VMA in a 18.5‐year‐old girl. (a) Frontal facial photograph, h...

Figure 12.10.9 VMA in a 25.7‐year‐old woman. (a) Frontal facial photograph: ...

Figure 12.10.10 The following bilateral landmarks (r: right, l: left) were m...

Guide

Cover Page

Table of Contents

Title Page

Copyright Page

List of Contributors

Begin Reading

Index

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Pages

iii

iv

xiv

xv

xvi

xvii

1

2

3

4

5

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

301

302

303

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

311

312

313

314

315

316

317

318

319

320

321

322

323

324

325

326

327

328

329

330

331

332

333

334

335

336

337

338

339

340

341

342

343

344

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

353

354

355

356

357

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

365

366

367

368

369

370

371

372

373

374

375

376

377

378

379

380

381

382

383

384

385

386

387

388

389

390

391

392

393

394

395

396

397

398

399

400

401

402

403

404

405

406

407

408

409

410

411

412

413

414

415

416

417

418

419

420

421

422

423

424

425

426

427

428

429

430

431

432

433

434

435

436

437

438

439

440

441

Dentofacial and Occlusal Asymmetries

Edited by

Birte Melsen, D.D.S., Dr. Odont., Dr. h.c.

Visiting Professor of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY, USA

Former Professor and Head of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health,

Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

Athanasios E. Athanasiou, D.D.S., M.S.D., Dr. Dent.

Dean and Professor of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

Honorary Professor of Orthodontics, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences Dubai, UAE

Former Dean, Professor and Head of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki, Greece

This edition first published 2025© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.

The right of Birte Melsen and Athanasios E. Athanasiou to be identified as the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.

Registered OfficesJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.

Trademarks: Wiley and the Wiley logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries and may not be used without written permission. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyThe contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting scientific method, diagnosis, or treatment by physicians for any particular patient. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.

Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data applied for:

ISBN 9781119794813 (hardback)

Cover Design: WileyCover Images: Courtesy of George Anka, Ioannis Latrou, Ute Schneider‐Moser

List of Contributors

Aron Aliaga‐Del Castillo, D.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D.Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodonticsand Pediatric Dentistry School of DentistryUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor, MIUSA

George Anka, D.D.S., M.S.Private Practice of OrthodonticsTokyoJapan

Athanasios E. Athanasiou, D.D.S., M.S.D., Dr. Dent.Dean and Professor of Orthodontics, School of DentistryEuropean University CyprusNicosiaCyprusHonorary Professor of OrthodonticsMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicineand Health SciencesDubaiUAEFormer Dean, Professor and Head of OrthodonticsSchool of DentistryAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Zakaria Bentahar, D.M.D., M.D.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.Professor of OrthodonticsHassan II UniversityCasablancaMorocco

Joseph Bouserhal, D.D.S., M.D.S., Ph.D.Professor and Acting Chair, Department of OrthodonticsFaculty of Dental MedicineSaint Joseph University of BeirutBeirutLebanonDirector, Craniofacial Research LaboratoryFaculty of Dental MedicineSaint Joseph University of BeirutBeirutLebanonAdjunct Clinical Professor, Department of Orthodontics andDentofacial Orthopedics, Henry Goldman School of DentistryBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Lea J. Bouserhal, DDS, M.S.Private Practice of OrthodonticsBeirutLebanon

Philippe J. Bouserhal, D.D.S., M.D.S.Private Practice of OrthodonticsBeirut, Lebanon and LeuvenBelgium

Eugene Chan, B.D.S., M.D.Sc., M.Orth.R.C.S.Ed., M.R.A.C.D.S.(Ortho), Ph.D.Clinical Professor, Discipline of OrthodonticsSchool of Dentistry Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Kwangchul Choy, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.Clinical Professor, Department of OrthodonticsSchool of DentistryYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Lucia H. Soares Cevidanes, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.Thomas and Doris Graber Endowed Professor of Dentistryand Associate Professor, Department of OrthodonticsSchool of DentistryUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor, MIUSA

M. Ali Darendeliler, B.D.S., Ph.D., Dip. Orth., Certif. Orth.,Priv. Doc, F.I.C.D., M.R.A.C.D.S. (Orth.)Professor and Chair, Discipline of OrthodonticsSchool of DentistryFaculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyAustraliaHead, Department of OrthodonticsSydney Dental HospitalSydneyAustralia

Karine Evangelista, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.Assistant Professor, Division of OrthodonticsSchool of DentistryFederal University of GoiásGoiásBrazil

Giampietro Farronato, M.D., D.D.S.Professor Emeritus of Orthodontics, School of DentistryUniversity of MilanMilanItaly

Padhraig S. Fleming, B.Dent.Sc.(Hons.), M.Sc., Ph.D., F.D.S.(Orth.), F.F.D.(Orth.), F.H.E.A.Chair and Professor of Orthodontics and ProgrammeLead, Doctorate in Orthodontics, Division of Public andChild Dental HealthDublin Dental University Hospital, The University ofDublin, Trinity College DublinIrelandHonorary Professor of OrthodonticsQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Joseph G. Ghafari, D.M.D.Professor and Chair, Department of Dentofacial MedicineAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterBeirutLebanon

Hans Gjørup, DDS, PhDSpecialist in OrthodonticsIkastDenmark

Ismaeel Hansa, B.D.S., M.D.S.Private practice of OrthodonticsDurbanSouth Africa

David C. Hatcher, D.D.S., M.Sc., M.R.C.D. (C)Specialist in Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologyUniversity of California Los Angeles, University ofCalifornia San Francisco, University of California Davisand University of PacificCaliforniaUSA

Dorte Haubek, D.D.S., Ph.D., Dr. Odont.Professor, Department of Dentistry and Oral HealthAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Ioannis Iatrou, D.D.S., M.D., Ph.D.Professor Emeritus of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgerySchool of DentistryNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Guilherme Janson, D.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D. (deceased)Professor and Head, Department of OrthodonticsBauru Dental SchoolUniversity of São PaoloBauru, São PaoloBrazil

Eleftherios G. Kaklamanos, D.D.S., Cert., Cert., M.Sc., M.A., Ph.D.Associate Professor, School of DentistryAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreeceAdjunct Associate Professor of Orthodontics, Hamdan BinMohammed College of Dental MedicineMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine andHealth SciencesDubaiUAEAssociate Professor, School of DentistryEuropean University CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Stavros Kiliaridis, D.D.S., Odont. Dr. / Ph.D.Professor Emeritus of Orthodontics, School of DentalMedicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerlandAdjunct Professor, Department of Orthodontics andDentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Steven J. Lindauer, D.M.D., M.Dent.Sc.Paul Tucker Goad Professor and Chair, Department ofOrthodontics, School of DentistryVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmond, VAUSA

Cesare Luzi, D.D.S., M.Sc.Visiting Professor, Department of OrthodonticsUniversity of Ferrara, Ferrara and University CattolicaRomeItaly

Camila Massaro, D.D.S., M.S.D., Ph.D.Bauru Dental SchoolUniversity of São PauloBauruBrazilSchool of DentistryUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor, MIUSA

Maria Costanza Meazzini di Seyssel, D.M.D., M.Med.Sci.Scientific Director, Cleft Lip and Palate Regional CenterOperation Smile S. Paolo HospitalMilanItalyConsultant for Craniofacial Anomalies, Department ofMaxillo‐Facial SurgeryS. Gerardo HospitalMonzaItalyAdjunct Professor in Craniofacial AnomaliesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly

Birte Melsen, D.D.S., Dr. Odont., Dr. h.c.Visiting Professor of Orthodontics, College of DentistryNew York UniversityNew York, NYUSAFormer Professor and Head of OrthodonticsDepartment of Dentistry and Oral HealthAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Lorenz Moser, M.D., D.D.S.Visiting Professor, Department of OrthodonticsUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Thomas Klit Pedersen, D.D.S., Ph.D.Clinical Professor, Consultant OrthodontistDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAarhus University Hospital and Section of OrthodonticsDepartment of Dentistry and Oral HealthAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Pertti Pirttiniemi, D.D.S., Ph.D., Dr. Orthod.Professor Emeritus of Oral Development andOrthodontics, Faculty of OdontologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas, Ph.D.Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Ute E.M. Schneider‐Moser, D.D.S., M.S.Visiting Professor, Department of OrthodonticsUniversity of FerraraFerraraItalyDepartment of OrthodonticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PAUSA

Bhavna Shroff, D.D.S., M.Dent.Sc., M.P.A.Norborne Muir Professor and Graduate Program DirectorDepartment of Orthodontics, School of DentistryVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmond, VIUSA

Steven M. Siegel, D.M.D.Private Practice of OrthodonticsGlen Burnie, MDUSA

Peter B. Stoustrup, D.D.S., Ph.D.Associate Professor and Head, Section of OrthodonticsDirector of Postgraduate Orthodontic ProgramDepartment of Dentistry and Oral HealthAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Emese Szabò, D.D.S.Private Practice of OrthodonticsRomeItaly

Nadia Theologie‐Lygidakis, D.D.S., M.Sc.(Med), M.Sc.(Dent), Ph.D.Associate Professor, Department of Oral and MaxillofacialSurgery School of DentistryNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Nikhillesh Vaiid, B.D.S., M.D.S., Ph.D., F.D.T.F.(Ed.), M.F.D.S. R.C.S.(Glasgow)Adjunct Professor, Department of OrthodonticsSaveetha Dental CollegeSaveetha Institute of Medical and Technical SciencesSaveetha UniversityChennaiIndia

Vidhya Venkateswaran, B.D.S., M.P.H., Ph.D.DATA Scholar, National Institute of Dental andCraniofacial ResearchBethesda, MDUSA

Larry M. Wolford, D.M.D.Clinical Professor, Departments of Oral and MaxillofacialSurgery and OrthodonticsTexas A&M University College of DentistryBaylor University Medical CenterDallas, TXUSA

1Introduction

Birte Melsen and Athanasios E. Athanasiou

CHAPTER MENU

References

Although each person shares with the rest of the population many characteristics, there are enough differences to make each human being a unique individual. Such limitless variation in the size, shape, and relationship of the dental, skeletal, and soft tissue facial structures are important in providing each individual with their identity (Bishara et al. 2001).

Dorland's Medical Dictionary defines symmetry as “the similar arrangement in form and relationships of parts around a common axis or on each side of a plane of the body” (Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary2000).

The absence of symmetry is asymmetry and is frequently experienced by man in their facial features, both structurally and functionally.

The term symmetry is generally used in two different contexts:

The first meaning is a precise and well‐defined concept of balance or “patterned self‐similarity” that can be demonstrated or proved according to the rules of a formal system, namely geometry, physics, or otherwise.

The second meaning is an imprecise sense of harmonious or esthetically pleasing proportionality and balance reflecting beauty or perfection. As such, symmetry was demonstrated within art by Leonardo Da Vinci in his Vitruvian Man in 1492 (

Figure 1.1

) (Baudouin and Tiberghien

2004

).

Asymmetry has, on the other hand, been part of the features characterizing the unpleasant and the unharmonious (Edler 2001; Rhodes et al. 2001).

Whereas symmetry in art is used to express harmony, beauty, and peace, asymmetrical layouts are generally more dynamic, and by intentionally ignoring balance, the designer can generate tension, express movement, or convey a mood such as anger, excitement, joy, or casual amusement (Komoro et al. 2009).

Facial asymmetry, being a common phenomenon, was probably first observed by the artists of early Greek statuary who recorded what they had found in nature – normal facial asymmetry (Lundstrom 1961).

A perfect facial symmetry is extremely rare and practically all normal faces exhibit a degree of asymmetry (Figure 1.2). As in art, where the side has an importance in the interpretation of a movement displayed on a painting, the two sides of the face may express feelings (Schirillo 2000).

The left side of the face is considered more emotionally expressive and more often connotes more negative emotions than the right side. Also interestingly, artists tend to expose more of their models left cheek than their right. This is significant, in that artists also portray more females than males with their left cheek exposed. These psychological findings lead to explanations for the esthetic leftward bias in portraiture (Schirillo 2000; Powell and Schirillo 2009).

The studies of asymmetry of the craniofacial region can be divided into two categories. One is focusing on facial asymmetry in various populations and its impact on perception of the individual's attractiveness and health. The second category is dealing with the influence of asymmetry on treatment of patients receiving orthodontic treatment or craniofacial surgery.

Studies of various populations belong to the first category, and facial symmetry has been associated with health, physical attractiveness, and beauty of a person. It is also hypothesized as a factor in interpersonal attraction, and relevant research indicates that bilateral symmetry is an important indicator of freedom from disease and worthiness for mating (Edler 2001).

Figure 1.1 Vitruvian Man drawn by Leonardo Da Vinci in 1492 demonstrating the symmetry of the ideal body.

Figure 1.2 Three images where the right face is composed of two right sides, the middle one is the real face, and the left one is composed of two left sides.

Most facial asymmetries among nonpatients are, however, fluctuating meaning that they have no significant influence on the attractiveness of the face. The perception of a face as attractive is more influenced by averageness meaning: what do the persons I like in “my tribe” look like. The beauty ideal is clearly changing with time and between various populations (Rhodes et al. 2001). The impact of averageness was studied by Komoro et al. (2009) who let laypeople evaluate the effect of symmetry and averageness on photographs and found that symmetry had a limited if any influence on attractiveness, thus confirming earlier findings by Baudouin and Tiberghien (2004). In a more recent study, it was found that symmetry on one hand reduced attractiveness by decreasing perceived normality, but on the other hand could also increase attractiveness by promoting the perceived symmetry (Zheng et al. 2021). Furthermore, it has been suggested that completely symmetrical faces might appear unemotional and thus less attractive (Swaddle and Cuthill 1995).

The second category of studies deal with asymmetry in relation to treatment. In reference to the need for treatment, it should be noted that the point at which normal asymmetry becomes abnormal cannot be easily defined and is often determined by the clinician's sense of balance and the patient's perception of the imbalance (Bishara et al. 2001). Minor asymmetry of the craniofacial skeleton and in the dentoalveolar region is often not easily detected. This can be the reason for which the optimal result of an orthodontic treatment cannot be reached since the asymmetry will often interfere with a satisfactory finishing.

The true prevalence of asymmetries in a population has never been described. Methodological limitations related to etiological factors, timing of appearance, degree of severity, progressing characteristics, and individuals' age, have enabled relevant studies only in subgroups of patients with facial asymmetry (i.e. hemofacial microsomia) or dentofacial deformities in university orthodontic clinics.

When studying dentofacial deformity patients at the University of North Carolina, it was found that 34% demonstrated an apparent facial asymmetries. When present, asymmetry affected the upper face in only 5%, the midface (primarily the nose) in 36%, and the chin in 74% (Severt and Proffit 1997).

Recently, Evangelista et al. (2022) performed a review of the prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal sagittal patterns and found that there was a significant difference between findings reported from different studies varying from 17.43 to 72.95%, and indicated that the more severe malocclusions exhibited more severe chin deviations than the nonorthodontic population.

Whereas most of the relevant studies have been focusing on facial asymmetry, Sheats et al. (1998) looked into the occlusal status of patients being treated in a graduate clinic and found that in 62% of the patients, the mandibular midline deviated from the facial midline.

An important part of this book will focus on the treatment of patients with various types of facial and dentoalveolar asymmetry focusing on interception, correction, or camouflage. The interception can only be performed for asymmetries related to functional deviations or/and eruption of teeth. Corrections and camouflage in some patients with skeletal asymmetries start at an early age and often continue for the remaining growth period. In adult patients, treatment comprises displacement of teeth and dentoalveolar modeling with goal‐oriented biomechanics and orthognathic surgery when needed. For asymmetries with different localization, their etiology and the possible treatment modalities from a biological, biomechanical, and surgical viewpoints will be discussed. In relation to management, generating symmetry is among the goals of most treatment plans. However, when the outcome of orthodontics is assessed, even minor asymmetries are frequently impossible to generate a result that is compatible with ideal morphology and function.