1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 0,00 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 0,00 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Musaicum Books
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
Strabo's 'Geography' is a monumental work that serves as a comprehensive guide to the geographical knowledge of the ancient world. Written in the 1st century AD, the book combines a mix of historical anecdotes, cultural insights, and detailed descriptions of various regions, making it a valuable resource for understanding the ancient world. Strabo's literary style is characterized by its meticulous attention to detail and its engaging storytelling, allowing readers to immerse themselves in the rich tapestry of the ancient world. The 'Geography' is considered a seminal work in the field of ancient geography and has been cited by scholars for centuries. Strabo's work provides a window into the geographical knowledge and perceptions of the ancient Greeks and Romans, shedding light on their understanding of the world around them. Studying this work can offer invaluable insights into the mindset of ancient civilizations and their interactions with the world. This book is recommended to anyone interested in ancient history, geography, or classical literature, as it offers a unique perspective on the ancient world that is both informative and engaging. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020
Ähnliche
Geography
Books
Table of Contents
Introduction
Between the edges of the known sea and the ambitions of empire, a geographer assembles a world from memory, measurement, and rumor, testing the limits of knowledge as carefully as a navigator sounding depths before a coast dark with possibility, drawing lines that both record what ships and soldiers have verified and admit where silence begins, and in the act of mapping that inhabited expanse he confronts the perennial question of how facts, travel, and power cooperate, collide, and correct one another to produce a coherent picture of the earth and the peoples who occupy its mountains, rivers, cities, and shores.
Strabo, a Greek writer from Amaseia in Pontus who lived from the late first century BCE into the early first century CE, composed the work known as Geography in seventeen books. Writing in Greek during the age of Augustus and Tiberius, he set out to describe the oikoumene—the inhabited world—as it was known to learned readers of his time. Combining reports from earlier scholars with observations from his own travels in regions such as Asia Minor, Greece, Italy, and Egypt, Strabo presents a comprehensive survey that seeks utility for public life and clarity for study, without sacrificing breadth, curiosity, or critical restraint.
The book’s status as a classic rests on its rare fusion of scholarship and literary design. Geography does not merely list places; it shapes a persuasive view of how locations, climates, resources, and peoples interrelate within history. Strabo’s narrative voice moves from mountains and rivers to customs and political arrangements, all in a prose that is learned yet lucid. By setting geographical writing within a coherent argument about usefulness and credibility, he extends the reach of earlier Hellenistic inquiry and offers readers a model for synthesizing knowledge across disciplines, an achievement that continues to command respect across centuries.
Geography also endures because it became a conduit for earlier learning otherwise at risk of disappearance. Strabo evaluates and transmits the results of predecessors such as Eratosthenes and Polybius, and he reflects on poetic testimony that informed older geographic ideas. Later writers in antiquity and Byzantium drew upon his work for information and perspective, and the text’s preservation in Greek manuscript tradition ensured that Renaissance scholars could again engage with its methods and data. Through this long afterlife, Strabo’s pages have often served as both archive and argument, storing fragments of the past while modeling critical judgment.
The design of the seventeen books reveals Strabo’s ambition and care. He opens with methodological reflections and a sustained assessment of prior authorities, setting criteria for trustworthy testimony and useful arrangement. He then proceeds region by region through the Mediterranean and adjacent lands, extending outward to the edges of what his age considered habitable. The scope is panoramic yet orderly, attentive to coastlines and interiors alike. While one book survives only in part, the corpus as a whole is remarkably complete, offering a coherent structure that invites sustained reading and enables selective consultation for particular regions or themes.
Central to Strabo’s achievement is his method: he weighs evidence. Where distances, routes, and celestial phenomena have been measured, he privileges calculation; where travelers and historians report, he compares accounts; where tales strain credulity, he registers caution. He draws especially on learned predecessors while integrating what he observed during journeys under Roman rule. The result is a practical geography that treats location as inseparable from human affairs—useful for administration and strategy, and illuminating for anyone who seeks to understand how terrain shapes history and how communities adapt to the possibilities and constraints of their environments.
Strabo writes as a consummate prose artist as well as a researcher. His sentences guide the reader from landscape to people, from ports to hinterlands, from resources to customs, with a rhythm that suggests conversation among fields of knowledge. He can be briskly analytical when dismissing error, and expansive when a topic merits context. Anecdotes appear not as ornament but as tests of plausibility. The literary poise of the work supports its intellectual seriousness, allowing it to teach readers how to interpret reports, evaluate claims, and locate a single place within a network of relations.
The historical moment of composition matters. Strabo writes during the consolidation of Roman power around the Mediterranean, when routes, institutions, and information were being aligned on an imperial scale. His vantage point is thus both Greek and Roman, Hellenistic in education and Roman in horizon. The book does not function as imperial propaganda; it rather assumes a world structured by Roman roads, commerce, and administration, and asks what that structure reveals about distances, borders, and exchanges. Geography emerges as a civic art: a way of knowing that can assist decision-making and clarify the conditions under which societies prosper or falter.
Running through the work are themes that retain force: the reach and limits of knowledge, the reliability of witnesses, the relation between physical setting and cultural practice, and the tension between centers and peripheries. Seas, rivers, and mountain chains are not mere features; they organize contact, commerce, and conflict. Climate moderates possibility without dictating outcome. Patterns of settlement, resources, and travel routes connect seemingly distant places. In elaborating these themes, Strabo consistently asks what can be known, by whom, and to what end—questions that make Geography more than an inventory, and instead a philosophy of place.
The transmission and study of Geography reveal its durable value. Copied and read in the Greek-speaking world, the work traversed late antiquity and Byzantium, with excerpts and summaries helping preserve parts that suffered damage. Modern critical editions and translations have further stabilized the text, enabling rigorous analysis of Strabo’s sources and arguments. Because the work gathers data otherwise lost, historians, philologists, archaeologists, and historical geographers consult it to contextualize inscriptions, reconstruct ancient itineraries, and identify sites, while also examining its methods as a landmark in the history of scientific and humanistic inquiry.
Reading Strabo today requires attention to both insight and limitation. His perspective reflects the learning and assumptions of his time, and his judgments about peoples and places can carry the biases embedded in ancient categories. Yet precisely because he explains his criteria and weighs competing reports, the work teaches how to read sources critically. It shows how a careful writer can move from story to structure, from data to argument, and from scattered observations to a map that helps orient understanding without pretending to finality or exhaustive certainty.
As an introduction to Geography, this volume invites readers to approach Strabo as a guide to disciplined curiosity. The book’s classic status lies in its breadth, its method, and its prose—qualities that have influenced generations of writers who describe landscapes, trace networks, and study cultures. In an age that still struggles to connect local knowledge with global systems, Strabo’s synthesis remains instructive: it demonstrates how careful description can serve public life, how criticism refines inquiry, and how mapping the known always points toward what remains to be learned.
Synopsis
Strabo of Amasia, a Greek scholar writing in the early first century CE, composed Geography in seventeen books as a comprehensive description of the inhabited world. Synthesizing reports from earlier authors, official records, and his own travels, he aimed to provide a resource useful to statesmen and educated readers. The work combines physical outlines of lands and seas with ethnography, history, and economic observations, insisting that geography supports political judgment. Organized broadly by regions, it proceeds from methodological discussions to detailed surveys of Europe, Asia, and Africa. Throughout, Strabo evaluates sources, preferring sober testimony over marvels and emphasizing geography’s practical and cultural dimensions.
The opening books establish purpose and method. In Book 1, Strabo argues for geography’s utility and reviews predecessors, praising contributions while correcting errors. He examines the use of poets, especially Homer, as witnesses for early geographic knowledge, cautioning about poetic exaggeration. Book 2 develops the technical framework: the size and shape of the inhabited world, the division into zones, the role of astronomical observations for latitude, and the mapping of distances along parallels and meridians. Strabo appraises cartographic practices and the appropriate degree of precision, linking measurement to historical narrative and administrative needs rather than to abstract, purely mathematical completeness.
Beginning his regional survey with Europe’s far west, Strabo treats Iberia in Book 3. He outlines the peninsula’s boundaries at the Pyrenees, the Atlantic, and the Mediterranean, describing coasts, harbors, and inland mountain chains. Major rivers structure the account and anchor comments on settlement, agriculture, and mineral wealth. He notes established cities and ports important to long-distance trade, along with Roman provincial organization after recent conquests. Ethnographic sketches are paired with strategic considerations, such as control of straits and passes. Strabo compares diverse testimonies about the Atlantic seaboard, weighing travel narratives against hearsay to characterize this fringe of the Mediterranean world.
Turning north and east in Book 4, Strabo surveys Gaul, the Alps, and the islands of Britain and Ireland. River systems and mountain barriers organize the description, showing how the Rhône, Rhine, and their tributaries tie interior regions to different seas. He records peoples, urban centers, and the growth of road networks under Roman authority, noting how military campaigns yielded better information. Britain enters the narrative cautiously, with distances, climates, and resources reported from reliable observers and balanced against uncertain claims. The Alpine passes appear as vital connectors between Italy and transalpine provinces, shaping movements of commerce, armies, and cultures.
Books 5 and 6 focus on Italy and Sicily. Strabo situates Rome within central Italy’s geography, relating the city’s growth to riverine access, harbors, and surrounding plains. He describes the Apennines, fertile lowlands, and coasts dotted with renowned sites, and he remarks on volcanic phenomena in southern Italy and Sicily. The catalogue of towns and regions proceeds from the Tyrrhenian to the Adriatic side, integrating notes on agriculture, crafts, and communications. Sicily’s position between Italy and Africa receives special attention, as do its mountains and straits. Strabo consistently ties topography to historical settlement patterns and to administrative and economic functions.
Book 7 addresses northern and northeastern Europe, including areas around the Danube and the Thracian and Pontic zones, though portions of this material are preserved imperfectly. He treats peoples beyond the better-known Mediterranean rim with care, indicating routes, frontiers, and natural resources where testimony permits. With Books 8 to 10 he turns south to Greece. The Peloponnese is followed by central Greece and Attica, then Thessaly and Boeotia, before Euboea and the Aegean islands, including Crete. Ancient cults, sanctuaries, and legendary itineraries are mapped onto the landscape, while Strabo correlates Homeric geography with contemporary knowledge and with the political realities of his day.
Asia occupies Books 11 to 14, beginning with regions north and east of the Taurus. Strabo describes the Caucasian area, including peoples near the Black Sea’s eastern shores, and moves through Armenia and Media, addressing the Caspian and adjacent lands. He then surveys interior Anatolia—Cappadocia, Pontus, Galatia, and Phrygia—before proceeding to the western littoral of the Troad, Aeolis, and Ionia, and onward to southwestern districts such as Caria, Lycia, Pamphylia, and Cilicia. Strategic passes and river valleys, notably gateways across the Taurus, structure commerce and military movement. Islands associated with these coasts are included as nodal points for maritime exchange and culture.
Books 15 and 16 carry the account farther east and south. Drawing on reports from Alexander’s companions and later writers, Strabo outlines Persia and neighboring regions, then India along the Indus and areas reached by Hellenistic exploration, judging marvel tales against practical testimony. He proceeds to Mesopotamia, Assyria, and Babylonia, and to Syria and Phoenicia, integrating notes on cities, agriculture, and trade. Judaea appears within this Levantine setting. Arabia is discussed with attention to incense routes, seaports, and desert crossings, as well as contacts across the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. Throughout, Strabo links environment, communications, and state power.
Book 17 concludes with Egypt and North Africa. The Nile’s course, inundation, and Delta provide the framework for Egypt’s settlement, agriculture, and administration, with Alexandria presented as a major cultural and commercial center. Strabo also describes regions to the south, traditionally termed Aithiopia, and surveys the Mediterranean littoral of North Africa under Roman control, highlighting coastal cities and interior oases. His closing sections maintain the work’s balance of physical outline, ethnography, and historical context. Geography emerges as a discipline tying landscapes to human affairs, and as a durable repository of coordinated knowledge that later readers used to interpret the ancient Mediterranean and its surrounding worlds.
Historical Context
Strabo’s Geography emerged in the transition from the Hellenistic kingdoms to the early Roman Empire, roughly late first century BCE to early first century CE. The eastern Mediterranean’s lingua franca was Greek, while Roman political and military institutions framed public life. City-states, allied communities, and client kingdoms operated under Roman oversight, with the Augustan Principate consolidating authority after decades of civil war. Scholarly traditions from places like Alexandria and Rhodes supplied methods and texts. Within this setting, Strabo wrote in Greek for an educated audience, aiming to describe the inhabited world as a practical compendium for rulers, generals, and teachers living under Roman hegemony.
Born in Amaseia in Pontus around 64/63 BCE, Strabo belonged to an elite local milieu shaped by earlier allegiance to Mithridates VI and subsequent Roman settlement. He studied with Aristodemus of Nysa and later with the grammarian Tyrannion and the philosopher Xenarchus, part of a Greco-Roman intellectual network centered in Asia Minor, Rome, and possibly Alexandria. He traveled extensively, including Italy, Greece, and Egypt, and composed a large, now-lost historical work before the Geography. The latter was drafted over years and likely completed in the early reign of Tiberius (after 14 CE), reflecting decades of observation, reading, and synthesis across imperial territories.
Strabo lived through Rome’s transformation from Republic to Principate. After Julius Caesar’s assassination (44 BCE) and the ensuing civil wars, Octavian defeated Antony and Cleopatra at Actium (31 BCE) and established his rule as Augustus (27 BCE). Administrative reforms, veteran settlements, and the gradual regularization of provinces marked a new political order. The so-called Pax Romana fostered long-distance travel and information exchange that undergird Strabo’s project. Geography mirrors these conditions: it presumes reliable roads, stable frontiers, and a centralized authority able to collect, disseminate, and evaluate knowledge about far-flung peoples and places for governing purposes.
The eastern provinces that Strabo knew best had been reshaped by the Mithridatic Wars (c. 88–63 BCE) and Pompey’s reorganization of Asia Minor and Syria. Pompey annexed territories, installed client kings, and founded or refounded cities, laying a framework maintained and adjusted by Augustus. Pontus, Bithynia, Galatia, Cappadocia, and Commagene formed a mosaic of provinces and client realms. Strabo’s detailed treatment of Anatolia—its river systems, cities, cultic centers, and roads—reflects this inheritance. He frequently links ethnographic characterizations and economic resources to the recent Roman settlement, explaining how military conquest and diplomacy altered boundaries, hierarchies, and routes.
Egypt’s annexation in 30 BCE created a pivotal Roman province under a prefect. Strabo visited soon after, traveling up the Nile to Syene (Aswan) and observing Alexandria’s urban planning, the Fayum’s irrigation, temples, and quarry districts. He comments on the Nile’s inundation, the canal systems, and agricultural productivity that supplied Rome’s grain. His account intertwines autopsy with prior literature, showing how conquest opened scholarly access to a once royal Ptolemaic domain. The failed expedition of the prefect Aelius Gallus into Arabia (late 20s BCE) and the organization of Red Sea ports framed Strabo’s discussion of Egypt’s strategic and commercial importance.
To the east, the Parthian Empire contested influence with Rome across Mesopotamia, Armenia, and the upper Euphrates. Augustus famously negotiated the return of Roman standards in 20 BCE, preferring diplomacy and client kingship to direct annexation. Armenia oscillated between the spheres, serving as a buffer. Strabo surveys Parthian governance, cavalry strength, royal succession, and regional geography, drawing on Greek and Roman writers and recent political events. His treatment underscores an imperial frontier managed through treaties, dynastic marriages, and occasional campaigns, demonstrating how geography in his hands functions as a register of power balances as well as distances and terrains.
In the west, Roman expansion under Caesar and Augustus transformed Gaul, Spain, and the Alpine regions. Caesar’s conquest of Gaul (58–50 BCE) integrated the region into Roman administrative and road networks. Augustus oversaw the Cantabrian Wars (29–19 BCE) in northern Spain and campaigns in the Alps (16–15 BCE), while operations along the Rhine and Danube established a frontier system. Strabo’s descriptions of tribes, resources, and trade routes align with this consolidation, sometimes contrasting agricultural, urbanized regions with forested, pastoral zones. He embeds ethnographic notes within accounts of military corridors and river systems, highlighting the link between provincial control and geographic intelligibility.
The Augustan state invested in infrastructure that made Strabo’s project feasible. A network of paved roads, milestones, and bridges tied provincial centers to Italy. The cursus publicus, a state courier system, enabled official communications and facilitated the movement of administrators and information. Strabo frequently reports measurements in stadia and stage-posts, drawing on itineraries and official surveys. Routes such as the Via Egnatia connected the Adriatic to Macedonia and the Aegean, structuring movement across the Balkans. This logistical web not only supported armies and tax collection but also the circulation of scholars, merchants, and texts that furnished the data assembled in the Geography.
Mediterranean and Indian Ocean commerce underpinned everyday life and imperial revenues. Strabo notes the prominence of Egyptian grain, North African estates, and regional specializations such as Spanish metals and Anatolian timber. He records Red Sea ports like Myos Hormos and Berenice, through which ships sailed to the Arabian and Indian coasts. By the late Hellenistic and early Roman periods, mariners increasingly exploited seasonal monsoon winds, shortening voyages. Nabataean intermediaries, with Petra as a hub, channeled incense and aromatics northward. Strabo situates these exchanges within a fiscal and administrative frame, explaining how customs stations, harbors, and client polities integrated distant markets into Roman oversight.
Strabo’s intellectual landscape was shaped by earlier Greek geographic inquiry. He inherits and critiques Eratosthenes’ systematic mapping, Hipparchus’ astronomical refinements, Polybius’ historically informed chorography, and Poseidonius’ wide-ranging ethnography. He also makes use of historians and periploi, along with local authors such as Artemidorus of Ephesus. From Rome, he knew of Marcus Agrippa’s world survey and its display on the Porticus Vipsania, a public map project that compiled distances and regions. Strabo discusses such measurements, sometimes approving, sometimes skeptical, showing a method that compares authorities, weighs plausibility, and integrates new imperial data into the long Greek tradition.
The scientific tools available to Strabo included the concept of a spherical earth, climatic zones (climata) based on latitude, and shadow-length ratios from gnomon observations. He reports the celebrated estimate of Earth’s circumference by Eratosthenes, while also relaying debates involving Hipparchus and Poseidonius over distances and the size of the oikoumene. Yet he emphasizes utility: geography, he argues, serves statesmen and generals more than geometers. Accordingly, he privileges coherent regional description over exact coordinates, insisting that reliable travel distances, natural boundaries, and political units matter most for administration, strategy, and education within a vast, hierarchically organized imperial space.
Ethnography plays a central role in Strabo’s framework. Inherited Greek categories distinguish between more and less “civilized” lifeways, often linking climate, diet, and institutions to character. Strabo applies these topoi to peoples from Iberia to India, yet he sometimes notes cultural change under Roman rule—settlement, law, and trade reshaping local customs. He is cautious with extraordinary claims, subjecting far-northern reports, especially those derived from Pytheas, to skepticism. In this blend, ethnography justifies governance by associating stability with certain civic forms, while also cataloging diversity that administrators and travelers needed to understand to move safely and profitably through the provinces.
Urban life provided the basic matrix of Strabo’s descriptions. Greek poleis and Hellenistic foundations retained councils, festivals, and gymnasia, while Roman colonies and municipalities introduced Latin law and veteran communities. Koine Greek remained dominant in the eastern provinces, facilitating education and administration alongside Latin. Coinage standardized transactions; harbor taxes and market dues supported civic budgets. Strabo frequently cites local products and industries—mines, fisheries, textiles, and vineyards—situating them in regional exchanges. His interest in harbors, roads, and river mouths underscores how urban nodes mediated everyday life, from grain rations to artisanship, within an increasingly interconnected imperial economy.
Religion and sacred geography are interwoven with politics in Strabo’s account. He catalogs sanctuaries, priesthoods, and sacred revenues, noting how major temples such as those at Ephesus and Comana Pontica anchored regional identities and economies. Festivals drew crowds and facilitated exchange, while oracles and cultic traditions legitimated local elites. Under Augustus, the imperial cult spread across the provinces, adding new focal points of loyalty. Strabo treats such sites as landmarks for navigation and as institutions with jurisdiction over land, taxes, and asylum, revealing how sacral landscapes both preserved older patterns and adapted to the administrative logic of Roman sovereignty.
Military activity generated crucial data for Strabo’s world picture. Greek sources on Alexander’s campaigns supplied “stathmoi” (stage) measurements across Asia, while Roman reconnaissance and road surveys consolidated knowledge in Gaul, Spain, and the Balkans. Naval expeditions refined coastal charts of the Atlantic and North Sea. Strabo repeatedly prefers firsthand testimony from soldiers, officials, and merchants, setting it against literary authorities. His skepticism toward implausible distances or monstrous peoples reflects a methodological commitment: geography is to be corrected by experience, especially the practical experiences of those who build roads, levy troops, collect customs, and sail the seasonally shifting winds.
Public representations of space influenced Strabo’s synthesis. Augustus promoted an orbis terrarum rhetoric through triumphs and inscriptions, notably the Res Gestae, which listed regions pacified or allied. Agrippa’s survey, later displayed in the Porticus Vipsania, offered a Romanized conspectus of the world. Strabo cites Roman measurements and administrative divisions, but he also subjects them to critical scrutiny, correcting overestimates or vague boundaries. This dialogue between imperial display and scholarly evaluation shows how elite knowledge functioned: official data supplied unprecedented scope, while Greek critical techniques sought coherence and credibility for readers concerned with policy, education, and the ethical appraisal of rule.
The composition of the Geography spanned years and drew on Strabo’s earlier Historical Sketches, which treated events from Hellenistic times into the rise of Augustus. Writing in seventeen books and in Greek prose, Strabo addressed an audience of cultivated administrators and students accustomed to rhetorical and philosophical training. The work’s completion in the early Tiberian period places it at a moment when Augustan institutions had stabilized but memory of conquest remained fresh. That timing explains its dual posture: a retrospective on centuries of Greek inquiry and a contemporary report on provinces, allies, and rivals under a regime that defined the known world’s political horizons at scale unprecedented in the Mediterranean past.
Author Biography
Strabo (c. 64 BCE–after 23 CE) was a Greek geographer and historian from Amaseia in Pontus, active during the transition from the Hellenistic kingdoms to the Roman Empire. He is best known for the seventeen-book Geographica, a sweeping description of the inhabited world that integrates topography, ethnography, and history. Writing as a learned Greek under Roman rule, he sought to synthesize earlier scholarship and contemporary observation into a coherent account useful to statesmen and educated readers. His work preserves valuable reports about regions and peoples, many of which are otherwise unattested, and it remains a central source for understanding the Mediterranean and Near Eastern world of his age.
Strabo received a cosmopolitan education characteristic of elite intellectuals of his era. In Asia Minor he studied grammar with Aristodemus of Nysa, and in Rome he continued his studies with the scholar Tyrannion. He also engaged with philosophical instruction, notably under Xenarchus, a Peripatetic. His long stays in Rome and Alexandria gave him access to rich libraries and scholarly networks. Strabo’s reading ranged from Homer to technical treatises; he drew heavily on Eratosthenes for geographical framework, on Polybius for historical method, and on Posidonius and Hipparchus for scientific and astronomical discussions. These influences shaped his ambition to unite literary culture with empirical inquiry.
Although Strabo relied on many written sources, he traveled widely and often wrote from personal observation. He knew western Asia Minor and mainland Greece, and he spent significant time in Rome. His account of Egypt reflects first-hand travel along the Nile as far as Syene, and he describes the administrative landscape of Roman rule there. He refers to contemporary military and exploratory enterprises, including the Arabian expedition of the prefect Aelius Gallus, integrating official reports into his narrative. Strabo blended autopsy with informed hearsay from merchants, officials, and earlier writers, continually signaling where his knowledge was direct and where it depended on others.
Before the Geography, Strabo composed a large historical work known as Historical Sketches in forty-seven books, now lost except for fragments and testimonia. It appears to have continued the narrative of Greek and Roman affairs beyond Polybius, but its precise scope is uncertain. The surviving Geographica, arranged in seventeen books, opens with methodological discussions, then surveys Europe, Asia, and Libya, the latter term covering North Africa and Egypt. He reports distances, routes, cities, customs, and natural features, while critiquing earlier authorities. The work balances descriptive narrative with analytical evaluation of sources, aiming to produce a comprehensive account of the oikoumene for an imperial age.
Strabo conceived geography as an applied discipline serving civic and strategic needs. He favored a practical approach over abstract mathematical speculation, though he engaged with astronomical and geometrical arguments when they clarified the shape and climate of the inhabited world. He often evaluates the credibility of predecessors, accepting Eratosthenes in many fundamentals while correcting him, and treating some reports, such as those of Pytheas on the far North, with marked skepticism. For Strabo, ethnography and history were integral to geography: he traced how peoples, constitutions, and economies shaped regions. This orientation produced a narrative attentive to cultural character as well as terrain and distance.
The immediate ancient reception of Strabo is imperfectly documented, but his Geography endured through manuscript transmission, especially in Byzantine scholarly circles that excerpted, summarized, and copied portions of the text. The work reentered broader circulation in early modern Europe through translations and printed editions, becoming a major resource for humanists and historians interested in classical places and peoples. Because Strabo compiled and evaluated a wide array of earlier sources, many now lost, his books offered a unique portal into otherwise inaccessible traditions. Modern textual scholarship has reconstructed the work from multiple manuscript families, preserving its voice despite the uneven survival of copies.
The precise details of Strabo’s later life and death are uncertain; internal references suggest he lived into the reign of Tiberius and was active after 23 CE. His mature outlook reflects the consolidation of Roman power under Augustus and Tiberius and the opportunities that imperial order afforded learned inquiry and travel. As a witness to the early Principate, he provided a synoptic view in which geography and history illuminate one another. Today his Geography remains indispensable for ancient topography, ethnography, and historiography, frequently consulted by classicists, archaeologists, and historians. Its measured criticism, wide learning, and integrative method continue to shape scholarly understanding.
Geography
Volume 1
Table of Contents
BOOK I.
INTRODUCTION.
SUMMARY.
That geographical investigation is not inconsistent with philosophy.—That Homer gives proof of it throughout his poems.—That they who first wrote on the science have omitted much, or given disjointed, defective, false, or inconsistent accounts.—Proofs and demonstrations of the correctness of this statement, with general heads containing a summary description of the disposition of the whole habitable earth.—Credit to be attached to the probabilities and evident proofs that in many regions the land and sea have been shifted, and exchanged places with each other.
CHAPTER I.
1.1If the scientific investigation of any subject be the proper avocation of the philosopher, Geography, the science of which we propose to treat, is certainly entitled to a high place; and this is evident from many considerations. They who first ventured to handle the matter were distinguished men, Homer, Anaximander the Milesian, and Hecatæus, (his fellow-citizen according to Eratosthenes,) Democritus, Eudoxus, Dicæarchus, Ephorus, with many others, and after these Eratosthenes, Polybius, and Posidonius, all of them philosophers.
Nor is the great learning, through which alone this subject can be approached, possessed by any but a person acquainted with both human and divine things,2 and these attainments constitute what is called philosophy. In addition to its vast importance in regard to social life, and the art of government, Geography unfolds to us the celestial phenomena, acquaints us with the occupants of the land and ocean, and the vegetation, fruits, and peculiarities of the various quarters of the earth, a knowledge of which marks him who cultivates it as a man earnest in the great problem of life and happiness.
2. Admitting this, let us examine more in detail the points we have advanced.
And first, [we maintain,] that both we and our predecessors, amongst whom is Hipparchus[1], do justly regard Homer as the founder of geographical science, for he not only excelled all, ancient as well as modern, in the sublimity of his poetry, but also in his experience of social life. Thus it was that he not only exerted himself to become familiar with as many historic facts as possible, and transmit them to posterity, but also with the various regions of the inhabited land and sea, some intimately, others in a more general manner. For otherwise he would not have reached the utmost limits of the earth, traversing it in his imagination.
3. First, he stated that the earth was entirely encompassed by the ocean, as in truth it is; afterwards he described the countries, specifying some by name, others more generally by various indications, explicitly defining Libya,3 Ethiopia, the Sidonians, and the Erembi (by which latter are probably intended the Troglodyte Arabians); and alluding to those farther east and west as the lands washed by the ocean, for in ocean he believed both the sun and constellations to rise and set.
The stars also he describes as bathed in the ocean.6
4. He portrays the happiness of the people of the West, and the salubrity of their climate, having no doubt heard of the abundance of Iberia,7 which had attracted the arms of Hercules,8 afterwards of the Phœnicians, who acquired there an extended rule, and finally of the Romans. There the airs of Zephyr breathe, there the poet feigned the fields of Elysium, when he tells us Menelaus was sent thither by the gods:—
5. The Isles of the Blest10 are on the extreme west of Maurusia,11 near where its shore runs parallel to the opposite coast of Spain; and it is clear he considered these regions also Blest, from their contiguity to the Islands.
6. He tells us also, that the Ethiopians are far removed, and bounded by the ocean: far removed,—
Nor was he mistaken in calling them separated into two divisions, as we shall presently show: and next to the ocean,—
Speaking of the Bear, he implies that the most northern part of the earth is bounded by the ocean:
Now, by the “Bear” and the “Wain,” he means the Arctic Circle; otherwise he would never have said, “It alone is deprived of the baths of the ocean,” when such an infinity of stars is to be seen continually revolving in that part of the hemisphere. Let no one any longer blame his ignorance for being merely acquainted with one Bear, when there are two. It is probable that the second was not considered a constellation until, on the Phœnicians specially designating it, and employing it in navigation, it became known as one to the Greeks.15 Such is the case with the Hair of Berenice, and Canopus, whose names are but of yesterday; and, as Aratus remarks, there are numbers which have not yet received any designation. Crates, therefore, is mistaken when, endeavouring to amend what is correct, he reads the verse thus:
replacing οἴη by οἶος, with a view to make the adjective agree with the Arctic Circle, which is masculine; instead of the Arctic Constellation, which is feminine. The expression of Heraclitus is far more preferable and Homeric, who thus figuratively describes the Arctic Circle as the Bear,—“The Bear is the limit of the dawn and of the evening, and from the region of the Bear we have fine weather.” Now it is not the constellation of the Bear, but the Arctic Circle, which is the limit of the rising and the setting stars.
By the Bear, then, which he elsewhere calls the Wain, and describes as pursuing Orion, Homer means us to understand the Arctic Circle; and by the ocean, that horizon into which, and out of which, the stars rise and set. When he says that the Bear turns round and is deprived of the ocean, he was aware that the Arctic Circle [always] extended to the sign opposite the most northern point of the horizon. Adapting the words of the poet to this view, by that part of the earth nearest to the ocean we must understand the horizon, and by the Arctic Circle that which extends to the signs which seem to our senses to touch in succession the most northern point of the horizon. Thus, according to him, this portion of the earth is washed by the ocean. With the nations of the North he was well acquainted, although he does not mention them by name, and indeed at the present day there is no regular title by which they are all distinguished. He informs us of their mode of life, describing them as “wanderers,” “noble milkers of mares,” “living on cheese,” and “without wealth.”16
7. In the following speech of Juno, he states that the ocean surrounds the earth.
Does he not here assert that ocean bounds all its extremities, and does it not surround these extremities? Again, in the Hoplopœia,18 he places the ocean in a circle round the border of Achilles’ shield. Another proof of the extent of his knowledge, is his acquaintance with the ebb and flow of the sea, calling it “the ebbing ocean.”19 Again,
The assertion of thrice, instead of twice, is either an error of the author, or a blunder of the scribe, but the phenomenon is the same, and the expression soft-flowing,21 has reference to the flood-tide, which has a gentle swell, and does not flow with a full rush. Posidonius believes that where Homer describes the rocks as at one time covered with the waves, and at another left bare, and when he compares the ocean to a river, he alludes to the flow of the ocean. The first supposition is correct, but for the second there is no ground; inasmuch as there can be no comparison between the flow, much less the ebb of the sea, and the current of a river. There is more probability in the explanation of Crates, that Homer describes the whole ocean as deep-flowing, ebbing, and also calls it a river, and that he also describes a part of the ocean as a river, and the flow of a river; and that he is speaking of a part, and not the whole, when he thus writes:—
He does not, however, mean the whole, but the flow of the river in the ocean, which forms but a part of the ocean. Crates says, he speaks of an estuary or gulf, extending from the winter tropic towards the south pole.23 Now any one quitting this, might still be in the ocean; but for a person to leave the whole and still to be in the whole, is an impossibility. But Homer says, that leaving the flow of the river, the ship entered on the waves of the sea, which is the same as the ocean. If you take it otherwise you make him say, that departing from the ocean he came to the ocean. But this requires further discussion.
8. Perception and experience alike inform us, that the earth we inhabit is an island: since wherever men have approached the termination of the land, the sea, which we designate ocean, has been met with: and reason assures us of the similarity of those places which our senses have not been permitted to survey. For in the east24 the land occupied by the Indians, and in the west by the Iberians and Maurusians,25 is wholly encompassed [by water], and so is the greater part on the south26 and north.27 And as to what remains as yet unexplored by us, because navigators, sailing from opposite points, have not hitherto fallen in with each other, it is not much, as any one may see who will compare the distances between those places with which we are already acquainted. Nor is it likely that the Atlantic Ocean is divided into two seas by narrow isthmuses so placed as to prevent circumnavigation: how much more probable that it is confluent and uninterrupted! Those who have returned from an attempt to circumnavigate the earth, do not say they have been prevented from continuing their voyage by any opposing continent, for the sea remained perfectly open, but through want of resolution, and the scarcity of provision. This theory too accords better with the ebb and flow of the ocean, for the phenomenon, both in the increase and diminution, is every where identical, or at all events has but little difference, as if produced by the agitation of one sea, and resulting from one cause.
9. We must not credit Hipparchus, who combats this opinion, denying that the ocean is every where similarly affected; or that even if it were, it would not follow that the Atlantic flowed in a circle, and thus continually returned into itself. Seleucus, the Babylonian, is his authority for this assertion. For a further investigation of the ocean and its tides we refer to Posidonius and Athenodorus, who have fully discussed this subject: we will now only remark that this view agrees better with the uniformity of the phenomenon; and that the greater the amount of moisture surrounding the earth, the easier would the heavenly bodies be supplied with vapours from thence.
10. Homer, besides the boundaries of the earth, which he fully describes, was likewise well acquainted with the Mediterranean. Starting from the Pillars[2],28 this sea is encompassed by Libya, Egypt, and Phœnicia, then by the coasts opposite Cyprus, the Solymi,29 Lycia, and Caria, and then by the shore which stretches between Mycale30 and Troas, and the adjacent islands, every one of which he mentions, as well as those of the Propontis31 and the Euxine, as far as Colchis, and the locality of Jason’s expedition. Furthermore, he was acquainted with the Cimmerian Bosphorus,32 having known the Cimmerians,33 and that not merely by name, but as being familiar with themselves. About his time, or a little before, they had ravaged the whole country, from the Bosphorus to Ionia. Their climate he characterizes as dismal, in the following lines:—
He must also have been acquainted with the Ister[3],35 since he speaks of the Mysians, a Thracian race, dwelling on the banks of the Ister. He knew also the whole Thracian36 coast adjacent thereto, as far as the Peneus,37 for he mentions individually the Pæonians, Athos, the Axius,38 and the neighbouring islands. From hence to Thesprotis39 is the Grecian shore, with the whole of which he was acquainted. He was besides familiar with the whole of Italy, and speaks of Temese40 and the Sicilians, as well as the whole of Spain41 and its fertility, as we have said before. If he omits various intermediate places this must be pardoned, for even the compiler of a Geography overlooks numerous details. We must forgive him too for intermingling fabulous narrative with his historical and instructive work. This should not be complained of; nevertheless, what Eratosthenes says is false, that the poets aim at amusement, not instruction, since those who have treated upon the subject most profoundly, regard poesy in the light of a primitive philosophy. But we shall refute Eratosthenes42 more at length, when we have occasion again to speak of Homer.
11. What we have already advanced is sufficient to prove that poet the father of geography. Those who followed in his track are also well known as great men and true philosophers. The two immediately succeeding Homer, according to Eratosthenes, were Anaximander, the disciple and fellow-citizen of Thales, and Hecatæus the Milcsian. Anaximander [Pg 12] [Pg 13] was the first to publish a geographical chart. Hecatæus left a work [on the same subject], which we can identify as his by means of his other writings.
12. Many have testified to the amount of knowledge which this subject requires, and Hipparchus, in his Strictures on Eratosthenes, well observes, “that no one can become really proficient in geography, either as a private individual or as a professor, without an acquaintance with astronomy, and a knowledge of eclipses. For instance, no one could tell whether Alexandria in Egypt were north or south of Babylon, nor yet the intervening distance, without observing the latitudes.43 Again, the only means we possess of becoming acquainted with the longitudes of different places is afforded by the eclipses of the sun and moon.” Such are the very words of Hipparchus.
13. Every one who undertakes to give an accurate description of a place, should be particular to add its astronomical and geometrical relations, explaining carefully its extent, distance, degrees of latitude, and “climate.”44 Even a builder before constructing a house, or an architect before laying out a city, would take these things into consideration; much more should he who examines the whole earth: for such things in a peculiar manner belong to him. In small distances a little deviation north or south does not signify, but when it is the whole circle of the earth, the north extends to the furthest confines of Scythia,45 or Keltica,46 and the south to the extremities of Ethiopia: there is a wide difference here. The case is the same should we inhabit India or Spain, one in the east, the other far west, and, as we are aware, the antipodes47 to each other.
14. The [motions] of the sun and stars, and the centripetal force meet us on the very threshold of such subjects, and compel us to the study of astronomy, and the observation of such phenomena as each of us may notice; in which too, very considerable differences appear, according to the various points of observation. How could any one undertake to write accurately and with propriety on the differences of the various parts of the earth, who was ignorant of these matters? and although, if the undertaking were of a popular character, it might not be advisable to enter thoroughly into detail, still we should endeavour to include every thing which could be comprehended by the general reader.
15. He who has thus elevated his mind, will he be satisfied with any thing less than the whole world? If in his anxiety accurately to portray the inhabited earth, he has dared to survey heaven, and make use thereof for purposes of instruction, would it not seem childish were he to refrain from examining the whole earth, of which the inhabited is but a part, its size, its features, and its position in the universe; whether other portions are inhabited besides those on which we dwell, and if so, their amount? What is the extent of the regions not peopled? what their peculiarities, and the cause of their remaining as they are? Thus it appears that the knowledge of geography is connected with meteorology48 and geometry, that it unites the things of earth to the things of heaven, as though they were nearly allied, and not separated.
16. To the various subjects which it embraces let us add natural history, or the history of the animals, plants, and other different productions of the earth and sea, whether serviceable or useless, and my original statement will, I think, carry perfect conviction with it.
That he who should undertake this work would be a benefactor to mankind, reason and the voice of antiquity agree. The poets feign that they were the wisest heroes who travelled and wandered most in foreign climes: and to be familiar with many countries, and the disposition of the inhabitants, is, according to them, of vast importance. Nestor prides himself on having associated with the Lapithæ,50 to whom he went, “having been invited thither from the Apian51 land afar.”
So does Menelaus:—
Adding as a peculiarity of the country,
And of Egypt:—“Where the sustaining earth is most prolific.”54 And Thebes,
Such information greatly enlarges our sphere of knowledge, by informing us of the nature of the country, its botanical and zoological peculiarities. To these should be added its marine history; for we are in a certain sense amphibious, not exclusively connected with the land, but with the sea as well. Hercules, on account of his vast experience and observation, was described as “skilled in mighty works.”56
All that we have previously stated is confirmed both by the testimony of antiquity and by reason. One consideration however appears to bear in a peculiar manner on the case in point; viz. the importance of geography in a political view. For the sea and the earth in which we dwell furnish theatres for action; limited, for limited actions; vast, for grander deeds; but that which contains them all, and is the scene of the greatest undertakings, constitutes what we term the habitable earth; and they are the greatest generals who, subduing nations and kingdoms under one sceptre, and one political administration, have acquired dominion over land and sea. It is clear then, that geography is essential to all the transactions of the statesman, informing us, as it does, of the position of the continents, seas, and oceans of the whole habitable earth. Information of especial interest to those who are concerned to know the exact truth of such particulars, and whether the places have been explored or not: for government will certainly be better administered where the size and position of the country, its own peculiarities, and those of the surrounding districts, are understood. Forasmuch as there are many sovereigns who rule in different regions, and some stretch their dominion over others’ territories, and undertake the government of different nations and kingdoms, and thus enlarge the extent of their dominion, it is not possible that either themselves, nor yet writers on geography, should be equally acquainted with the whole, but to both there is a great deal more or less known. Indeed, were the whole earth under one government and one administration, it is hardly possible that we should be informed of every locality in an equal degree; for even then we should be most acquainted with the places nearest us: and after all, it is better that we should have a more perfect description of these, since, on account of their proximity, there is greater need for it. We see there is no reason to be surprised that there should be one chorographer57 for the Indians, another for the Ethiopians, and a third for the Greeks and Romans. What use would it be to the Indians if a geographer should thus describe Bœotia to them, in the words of Homer:—
To us this is of value, while to be acquainted with the Indies and their various territorial divisions would be useless, as it could lead to no advantage, which is the only criterion of the worth of such knowledge.
17. Even if we descend to the consideration of such trivial matters as hunting, the case is still the same; for he will be most successful in the chase who is acquainted with the size and nature of the wood, and one familiar with the locality will be the most competent to superintend an encampment, an ambush, or a march. But it is in great undertakings that the truth shines out in all its brilliancy, for here, while the success resulting from knowledge is grand, the consequences of ignorance are disastrous. The fleet of Agamemnon, for instance, ravaging Mysia, as if it had been the Trojan territory, was compelled to a shameful retreat. Likewise the Persians and Libyans,59 supposing certain straits to be impassable, were very near falling into great perils, and have left behind them memorials of their ignorance; the former a monument to Salganeus on the Euripus, near Chalcis, whom the Persians slew, for, as they thought, falsely conducting their fleet from the Gulf of Malea60 to the Euripus; and the latter to the memory of Pelorus, who was executed on a like occasion. At the time of the expedition of Xerxes, the coasts of Greece were covered with wrecks, and the emigrations from Æolia and Ionia furnish numerous instances of the same calamity. On the other hand, matters have come to a prosperous termination, when judiciously directed by a knowledge of the locality. Thus it was at the pass of Thermopylæ that Ephialtes is reported to have pointed out to the Persians a pathway over the mountains, and so placed the band of Leonidas at their mercy, and opened to the Barbarians a passage into Pylæ. But passing over ancient occurrences, we think that the late expeditions of the Romans against the Parthians furnish an excellent example, where, as in those against the Germans and Kelts, the Barbarians, taking advantage of their situation, [carried on the war] in marshes, woods, and pathless deserts, deceiving the ignorant enemy as to the position of different places, and concealing the roads, and the means of obtaining food and necessaries.
18. As we have said, this science has an especial reference to the occupations and requirements of statesmen, with whom also political and ethical philosophy is mainly concerned; and here is an evidence. We distinguish the different kinds of civil government by the office of their chief men, denominating one government a monarchy, or kingdom, another an aristocracy, a third a democracy; for so many we consider are the forms of government, and we designate them by these names, because from them they derive their primary characteristic. For the laws which emanate from the sovereign, from the aristocracy, and from the people all are different. The law is in fact a type of the form of government. It is on this account that some define right to be the interest of the strongest. If, therefore, political philosophy is advantageous to the ruler, and geography in the actual government of the country, this latter seems to possess some little superiority. This superiority is most observable in real service.
19. But even the theoretical portion of geography is by no means contemptible. On the one hand, it embraces the arts, mathematics, and natural science; on the other, history and fable. Not that this latter can have any distinct advantage: for instance, if any one should relate to us the wanderings of Ulysses, Menelaus, and Jason, he would not seem to have added directly to our fund of practical knowledge thereby, (which is the only thing men of the world are interested in,) unless he should convey useful examples of what those wanderers were compelled to suffer, and at the same time afford matter of rational amusement to those who interest themselves in the places which gave birth to such fables. Practical men interest themselves in these pursuits, since they are at once commendable, and afford them pleasure; but yet not to any great extent. In this class, too, will be found those whose main object in life is pleasure and respectability: but these by no means constitute the majority of mankind, who naturally prefer that which holds out some direct advantage. The geographer should therefore chiefly devote himself to what is practically important. He should follow the same rule in regard to history and the mathematics, selecting always that which is most useful, most intelligible, and most authentic.
20. Geometry and astronomy, as we before remarked, seem absolutely indispensable in this science. This, in fact, is evident, that without some such assistance, it would be impossible to be accurately acquainted with the configuration of the earth; its climata,61 dimensions, and the like information.
As the size of the earth has been demonstrated by other writers, we shall here take for granted and receive as accurate what they have advanced. We shall also assume that the earth is spheroidal, that its surface is likewise spheroidal, and above all, that bodies have a tendency towards its centre, which latter point is clear to the perception of the most average understanding. However we may show summarily that the earth is spheroidal, from the consideration that all things however distant tend to its centre, and that every body is attracted towards its centre of gravity; this is more distinctly proved from observations of the sea and sky, for here the evidence of the senses, and common observation, is alone requisite. The convexity of the sea is a further proof of this to those who have sailed; for they cannot perceive lights at a distance when placed at the same level as their eyes, but if raised on high, they at once become perceptible to vision, though at the same time further removed. So, when the eye is raised, it sees what before was utterly imperceptible. Homer speaks of this when he says,
Sailors, as they approach their destination, behold the shore continually raising itself to their view; and objects which had at first seemed low, begin to elevate themselves. Our gnomons, also, are, among other things, evidence of the revolution of the heavenly bodies; and common sense at once shows us, that if the depth of the earth were infinite,63 such a revolution could not take place.
Every information respecting the climata64 is contained in the “Treatises on Positions.”65
21. Now there are some facts which we take to be established, viz. those with which every politician and general should be familiar. For on no account should they be so uninformed as to the heavens and the position of the earth,66 that when they are in strange countries, where some of the heavenly phenomena wear a different aspect to what they have been accustomed, they should be in a consternation, and exclaim,
Still, we do not expect that they should be such thorough masters of the subject as to know what stars rise and set together for the different quarters of the earth; those which have the same meridian line, the elevation of the poles, the signs which are in the zenith, with all the various phenomena which differ as well in appearance as reality with the variations of the horizon and arctic circle. With some of these matters, unless as philosophical pursuits, they should not burden themselves at all; others they must take for granted without searching into their causes. This must be left to the care of the philosopher; the statesman can have no leisure, or very little, for such pursuits. Those who, through carelessness and ignorance, are not familiar with the globe and the circles traced upon it, some parallel to each other, some at right angles to the former, others, again, in an oblique direction; nor yet with the position of the tropics, equator, and zodiac, (that circle through which the sun travels in his course, and by which we reckon the changes of season and the winds,) such persons we caution against the perusal of our work. For if a man is neither properly acquainted with these things, nor with the variations of the horizon and arctic circle, and such similar elements of mathematics, how can he comprehend the matters treated of here? So for one who does not know a right line from a curve, nor yet a circle, nor a plane or spherical surface, nor the seven stars in the firmament composing the Great Bear, and such like, our work is entirely useless, at least for the present. Unless he first acquires such information, he is utterly incompetent to the study of geography. *So those who have written the works entitled “On Ports,” and “Voyages Around the World,” have performed their task imperfectly, since they have omitted to supply the requisite information from mathematics and astronomy.*68
22. The present undertaking is composed in a lucid style, suitable alike to the statesman and the general reader, after the fashion of my History.69 By a statesman we do not intend an illiterate person, but one who has gone through the course of a liberal and philosophical education. For a man who has bestowed no attention on virtue or intelligence, nor what constitutes them, must be incompetent either to blame or praise, still less to decide what actions are worthy to be placed on record.
