153,99 €
Employ the latest satellite positioning tech with this extensive guide GPS Satellite Surveying is the classic text on the subject, providing the most comprehensive coverage of global navigation satellite systems applications for surveying. Fully updated and expanded to reflect the field's latest developments, this new edition contains new information on GNSS antennas, Precise Point Positioning, Real-time Relative Positioning, Lattice Reduction, and much more. New contributors offer additional insight that greatly expands the book's reach, providing readers with complete, in-depth coverage of geodetic surveying using satellite technologies. The newest, most cutting-edge tools, technologies, and applications are explored in-depth to help readers stay up to date on best practices and preferred methods, giving them the understanding they need to consistently produce more reliable measurement. Global navigation satellite systems have an array of uses in military, civilian, and commercial applications. In surveying, GNSS receivers are used to position survey markers, buildings, and road construction as accurately as possible with less room for human error. GPS Satellite Surveying provides complete guidance toward the practical aspects of the field, helping readers to: * Get up to speed on the latest GPS/GNSS developments * Understand how satellite technology is applied to surveying * Examine in-depth information on adjustments and geodesy * Learn the fundamentals of positioning, lattice adjustment, antennas, and more The surveying field has seen quite an evolution of technology in the decade since the last edition's publication. This new edition covers it all, bringing the reader deep inside the latest tools and techniques being used on the job. Surveyors, engineers, geologists, and anyone looking to employ satellite positioning will find GPS Satellite Surveying to be of significant assistance.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1261
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015
Title Page
Copyright
Preface
Author Biographies
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Commonly Used GNSS Abbreviations
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Least-Squares Adjustments
2.1 Elementary Considerations
2.2 Stochastic and Mathematical Models
2.3 Mixed Model
2.4 Sequential Mixed Model
2.5 Model Specifications
2.6 Minimal and Inner Constraints
2.7 Statistics in Least-Squares Adjustment
2.8 Reliability
2.9 Blunder Detection
2.10 Examples
2.11 Kalman Filtering
Chapter 3: Recursive Least Squares
3.1 Static Parameter
3.2 Static Parameters and Arbitrary Time-Varying Variables
3.3 Dynamic Constraints
3.4 Static Parameters and Dynamic Constraints
3.5 Static Parameter, Parameters Subject to Dynamic Constraints, and Arbitrary Time-Varying Parameters
Chapter 4: Geodesy
4.1 International Terrestrial Reference Frame
4.2 International Celestial Reference System
4.3 Datum
4.4 3D Geodetic Model
4.5 Ellipsoidal Model
4.6 Conformal Mapping Model
4.7 Summary
Chapter 5: Satellite Systems
5.1 Motion of Satellites
5.2 Global Positioning System
5.3 GLONASS
5.4 Galileo
5.5 QZSS
5.6 Beidou
5.7 IRNSS
5.8 SBAS: WAAS, EGNOS, GAGAN, MSAS, and SDCM
Chapter 6: GNSS Positioning Approaches
6.1 Observables
6.2 Operational Details
6.3 Navigation Solution
6.4 Relative Positioning
6.5 Ambiguity Fixing
6.6 Network-Supported Positioning
6.7 Triple-Frequency Solutions
6.8 Summary
Chapter 7: Real-Time Kinematics Relative Positioning
7.1 Multisystem Considerations
7.2 Undifferenced and Across-Receiver Difference Observations
7.3 Linearization and Hardware Bias Parameterization
7.4 RTK Algorithm for Static and Short Baselines
7.5 RTK Algorithm for Kinematic Rovers and Short Baselines
7.6 RTK Algorithm with Dynamic Model and Short Baselines
7.7 RTK Algorithm with Dynamic Model and Long Baselines
7.8 RTK Algorithms with Changing Number of Signals
7.9 Cycle Slip Detection and Isolation
7.10 Across-Receiver Ambiguity Fixing
7.11 Software Implementation
Chapter 8: Troposphere and Ionosphere
8.1 Overview
8.2 Tropospheric Refraction and Delay
8.3 Troposphere Absorption
8.4 Ionospheric Refraction
Chapter 9: GNSS Receiver Antennas
9.1 Elements of Electromagnetic Fields and Electromagnetic Waves
9.2 Antenna Pattern and Gain
9.3 Phase Center
9.4 Diffraction and Multipath
9.5 Transmission Lines
9.6 Signal-to-Noise Ratio
9.7 Antenna Types
Appendix A: General Background
A.1 Spherical Trigonometry
A.2 Rotation Matrices
A.3 Linear Algebra
A.4 Linearization
A.5 Statistics
Appendix B: The Ellipsoid
B.1 Geodetic Latitude, Longitude, and Height
B.2 Computation on the Ellipsoidal Surface
Appendix C: Conformal Mapping
C.1 Conformal Mapping of Planes
C.2 Conformal Mapping of General Surfaces
C.3 Isometric Plane
C.4 Popular Conformal Mappings
Appendix D: Vector Calculus and Delta Function
Appendix E: Electromagnetic Field Generated by Arbitrary Sources, Magnetic Currents, Boundary Conditions, and Images
Appendix F: Diffraction over Half-Plane
Appendix G: Single Cavity Mode Approximation with Patch Antenna Analysis
Appendix H: Patch Antennas with Artificial Dielectric Substrates
Appendix I: Convex Patch Array Geodetic Antenna
References
Author Index
Subject Index
End User License Agreement
iv
xv
xvi
xvii
xix
xxi
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
737
731
732
733
734
735
736
738
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
763
764
765
766
767
769
770
771
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
36
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
161
160
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
186
185
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
346
343
344
345
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
444
443
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Figure 2.1.1
Figure 2.2.1
Figure 2.7.1
Figure 2.7.2
Figure 2.7.3
Figure 2.7.4
Figure 2.7.5
Figure 2.7.6
Figure 2.7.7
Figure 2.8.1
Figure 2.10.1
Figure 2.10.2
Figure 2.10.3
Figure 2.10.4
Figure 2.10.5
Figure 3.3.1
Figure 3.3.2
Figure 3.4.1
Figure 3.4.2
Figure 4.1.1
Figure 4.1.2
Figure 4.1.3
Figure 4.2.1
Figure 4.2.2
Figure 4.2.3
Figure 4.3.1
Figure 4.3.2
Figure 4.3.3
Figure 4.3.4
Figure 4.3.5
Figure 4.3.6
Figure 4.3.7
Figure 4.3.8
Figure 4.4.1
Figure 4.4.2
Figure 4.4.3
Figure 4.4.4
Figure 4.4.5
Figure 4.4.6
Figure 4.4.7
Figure 4.4.8
Figure 4.4.9
Figure 4.4.10
Figure 4.4.11
Figure 4.4.12
Figure 4.4.13
Figure 4.4.14
Figure 4.4.15
Figure 4.4.16
Figure 4.5.1
Figure 4.5.2
Figure 4.5.3
Figure 4.5.4
Figure 4.6.1
Figure 4.6.2
Figure 4.6.3
Figure 4.6.4
Figure 4.7.1
Figure 5.1.1
Figure 5.1.2
Figure 5.1.3
Figure 5.1.4
Figure 5.1.5
Figure 5.1.6
Figure 5.1.7
Figure 5.2.1
Figure 5.2.2
Figure 5.2.3
Figure 5.2.4
Figure 5.2.5
Figure 5.2.6
Figure 5.2.7
Figure 5.3.1
Figure 5.4.1
Figure 5.4.1
Figure 6.2.1
Figure 6.2.2
Figure 6.2.3
Figure 6.2.4
Figure 6.2.5
Figure 6.2.6
Figure 6.2.7
Figure 6.2.8
Figure 6.3.1
Figure 6.4.1
Figure 6.4.2
Figure 6.5.1
Figure 6.5.2
Figure 6.5.3
Figure 6.5.4
Figure 6.5.5
Figure 6.5.6
Figure 6.5.7
Figure 6.5.8
Figure 6.5.9
Figure 6.5.10
Figure 6.5.11
Figure 6.5.12
Figure 6.5.13
Figure 6.5.14
Figure 6.5.15
Figure 7.2.1
Figure 7.4.1
Figure 7.4.2
Figure 7.4.3
Figure 7.4.4
Figure 7.4.5
Figure 7.4.6
Figure 7.4.7
Figure 7.5.1
Figure 7.5.2
Figure 7.5.3
Figure 7.5.4
Figure 7.5.5
Figure 7.6.1
Figure 7.7.1
Figure 7.7.2
Figure 7.7.3
Figure 7.9.1
Figure 7.9.2
Figure 7.9.3
Figure 7.10.1
Figure 8.1.1
Figure 8.1.2
Figure 8.1.3
Figure 8.3.1
Figure 8.3.2
Figure 8.3.3
Figure 8.3.4
Figure 8.3.5
Figure 8.4.1
Figure 8.4.2
Figure 9.1.1
Figure 9.1.2
Figure 9.1.3
Figure 9.1.4
Figure 9.1.5
Figure 9.1.6
Figure 9.1.7
Figure 9.1.8
Figure 9.1.9
Figure 9.1.10
Figure 9.1.11
Figure 9.1.12
Figure 9.2.1
Figure 9.2.2
Figure 9.2.3
Figure 9.2.4
Figure 9.2.5
Figure 9.2.6
Figure 9.2.7
Figure 9.2.8
Figure 9.2.9
Figure 9.2.10
Figure 9.2.11
Figure 9.2.12
Figure 9.2.13
Figure 9.2.14
Figure 9.2.15
Figure 9.3.1
Figure 9.3.2
Figure 9.3.3
Figure 9.3.4
Figure 9.3.5
Figure 9.3.6
Figure 9.4.1
Figure 9.4.2
Figure 9.4.3
Figure 9.4.4
Figure 9.4.5
Figure 9.4.6
Figure 9.4.7
Figure 9.4.8
Figure 9.4.9
Figure 9.4.10
Figure 9.4.11
Figure 9.4.12
Figure 9.4.13
Figure 9.4.14
Figure 9.5.1
Figure 9.5.2
Figure 9.5.3
Figure 9.5.4
Figure 9.6.1
Figure 9.6.2
Figure 9.6.3
Figure 9.7.1
Figure 9.7.2
Figure 9.7.3
Figure 9.7.4
Figure 9.7.5
Figure 9.7.6
Figure 9.7.7
Figure 9.7.8
Figure 9.7.9
Figure 9.7.10
Figure 9.7.11
Figure 9.7.12
Figure 9.7.13
Figure 9.7.14
Figure 9.7.15
Figure 9.7.16
Figure 9.7.17
Figure 9.7.18
Figure 9.7.19
Figure 9.7.20
Figure 9.7.21
Figure 9.7.22
Figure 9.7.23
Figure 9.7.24
Figure 9.7.25
Figure 9.7.26
Figure 9.7.27
Figure 9.7.28
Figure 9.7.29
Figure 9.7.30
Figure 9.7.31
Figure 9.7.32
Figure 9.7.33
Figure A.1.1
Figure A.5.1
Figure A.5.2
Figure A.5.3
Figure A.5.4
Figure A.5.5
Figure B.1.1
Figure B.1.2
Figure B.1.3
Figure B.2.1
Figure B.2.2
Figure B.2.3
Figure B.2.4
Figure B.2.5
Figure C.1.1
Figure C.1.2
Figure C.4.1
Figure C.4.2
Figure C.4.3
Figure C.4.4
Figure D.1
Figure D.2
Figure D.3
Figure D.4
Figure E.1
Figure E.2
Figure E.3
Figure E.4
Figure F.1
Figure H.1
Figure H.2
Figure H.3
Figure H.4
Figure I.1
Figure I.2
Table 1.1
Table 2.5.1
Table 2.5.2
Table 2.5.3
Table 2.5.4
Table 2.5.5
Table 2.7.1
Table 2.7.2
Table 2.7.3
Table 2.8.1
Table 3.1.1
Table 3.2.1
Table 3.3.1
Table 3.4.1
Table 3.5.1
Table 4.1.1
Table 4.3.1
Table 4.4.1
Table 4.4.2
Table 4.4.3
Table 4.4.4
Table 4.5.1
Table 4.5.2
Table 4.5.3
Table 4.5.4
Table 4.6.1
Table 4.7.1
Table 5.1.1
Table 5.1.2
Table 5.2.1
Table 5.2.2
Table 5.2.3
Table 5.2.4
Table 5.2.5
Table 5.4.1
Table 5.5.1
Table 5.6.1
Table 6.2.1
Table 6.2.2
Table 6.3.1
Table 6.7.1
Table 7.1.1
Table 7.2.1
Table 7.2.2
Table 7.4.1
Table 7.4.2
Table 7.5.1
Table 7.6.1
Table 7.9.1
Table 7.10.1
Table 7.10.2
Table 8.2.1
Table 8.2.2
Table 9.1.1
Table A.5.1
Table B.1.1
Table B.2.1
Table B.2.2
Table C.4.1
Table C.4.2
Table C.4.3
Table C.4.4
Table C.4.5
Table C.4.6
Table C.4.7
Table C.4.8
ALFRED LEICK
LEV RAPOPORT
DMITRY TATARNIKOV
Cover image: Eric Morrison, UMaine and Wiley
Cover design: Wiley
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
Copyright © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey
Published simultaneously in Canada
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom.
For general information about our other products and services, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at (317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Leick, Alfred.
GPS satellite surveying / Alfred Leick, Lev Rapoport Dmitry Tatarnikov. – Fourth edition.
pages cm
Includes index.
ISBN 978-1-118-67557-1 (cloth) – 9781119018285 (epdf) – 9781119018261 (epub) 1. Artificial satellites in surveying. 2. Global Positioning System. I. Rapoport, Lev. II. Tatarnikov, Dmitry. III. Title.
TA595.5.L45 2015
526.9′82–dc23
2014040585
GPS Satellite Surveying has undergone a major revision in order to keep abreast with new developments in GNSS and yet maintain its focus on geodesy and surveying. All chapters have been reorganized in a more logical fashion. Because the GNSS systems have developed significantly since the last edition of the book, we have added new material on the GLONASS, Beidou, and Galileo systems, as well as on the ongoing modernization of GPS. A separate chapter was included on recursive least squares. Another chapter on RTK implementation was added that uses these recursive least-squares algorithms to process across-receiver observation differences and is capable of accepting observations from all GNSS systems. Examples are supported by real data processing. A third new chapter was added on GNSS user antennas. This chapter was prepared by an antenna expert to provide the necessary background information and details to allow practicing engineers to select the right antenna for a project. As to GNSS processing approaches, major new sections were added on PPP-RTK and TCAR. Six new additional appendices were added containing in-depth mathematical supplements for those readers who enjoy the mathematical rigor.
The original author of GPS Satellite Surveying, Alfred Leick, appreciates the contributions of Lev Rapoport and Dmitry Tatarnikov and most cordially welcomes these very qualified individuals as co-authors. All three of us wish to thank our families for their outstanding support throughout our professional careers. Lev Rapoport wishes to thank Javad GNSS for permission to use their receivers Triumph-1, Delta TRE-G3T, and Delta Duo-G2D for data collection, and Dr. Javad Ashjaee for the opportunity to get acquainted with GNSS technologies and observe its history through the eyes of a company employee. Dmitry Tatarnikov wishes to thank his colleagues at the Moscow Technology Center of Topcon for their contributions to the research, development, and production of antennas, and the management of Topcon Corporation for support of this work. Alfred Leick expresses his sincere appreciation to anybody contributing to this and any of the previous revisions of GPS Satellite Surveying. We appreciate Tamrah Brown's assistance in editing the draft in such a short period of time.
Alfred Leick received a Ph.D. from Ohio State University, Department of Geodetic Science, in 1977. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the peer-reviewed journal GPS Solutions (Springer), and author of numerous technical publications. His teaching career at the University of Maine in the area of GPS (Global Positioning System), geodesy, and estimation spans 34 years. Other teaching assignments included photogrammetry and remote sensing, digital image processing, linear algebra, and differential equations. He was the creator of the online GPS-GAP (GPS, Geodesy and Application Program) program at the University of Maine, which now continues to be available via Michigan Technological University (www.onlineGNSS.edu) in modified form. Dr. Leick launched his GPS research in 1982 when testing the Macrometer satellite receiver prototype at M.I.T. He continued GPS research throughout the years, including while on sabbatical leave at the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory (Cambridge, MA) in 1984, 3S-Navigation (Irvine, CA) in 1996, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Pasadena, CA) in 2002, as an Alexander von Humboldt Research Associate at the University of Stuttgart in 1985, a Fulbright Scholar at the University of Sao Paulo during the summers of 1991 and 1992, and a GPS Project Specialist on behalf of World Band and NRC (National Research Council) at Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping (P.R. China) in the Spring of 1990. He is a Fellow of ACSM (American Congress on Surveying and Mapping).
Dmitry V. Tatarnikov holds a Masters in EE (1983), Ph.D. (1990), and Doctor of Science (the highest scientific degree in Russia, 2009) degrees, all in applied electromagnetics and antenna theory and technique from the Moscow Aviation Institute—Technical University (MAI), Moscow, Russia. He joined the Antenna and Microwave Research Dept. of MAI in 1979, and is currently a professor of Radiophysics, Antennas and Microwave Dept. at MAI. In 1979–1994, he was involved in microstrip-phased array antenna research and development. In 1994, he joined Ashtech R&D Center in Moscow as an Antenna Research Fellow in the high-precision GNSS area. In 1997–2001, he was with Javad Positioning Systems as a senior scientist in the antenna area, and since 2001 he has been leading the Antenna Design with Topcon Technology Center, Moscow, Russia. Prof. Tatarnikov has authored and co-authored more than 70 publications in this area, including a book, research papers, conference presentations, and 12 patents. He has developed student courses in applied electromagnetics, numerical electromagnetics, and receiver GNSS antennas. He is a member of IEEE and the Institute of Navigation (ION), USA.
Lev B. Rapoport received a Master's in Electrical Engineering in 1976 from the radio-technical department of the Ural Polytechnic Institute, Sverdlovsk, and a Ph.D. in 1982 in automatic control from the Institute of System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Science (RAS), Moscow. In 1995, he received a Doctor of Science degree in automatic control from the Institute of Control Sciences RAS. Since 2003, he has held the head of the “Non-linear Systems Control” laboratory position in this institute. From 1993 to 1998, he worked for Ashtech R&D Center in Moscow part time as a researcher. From 1998 to 2001, he was with Javad Positioning Systems as a Real Time Kinematics (RTK) team leader. From 2001 to 2005, he worked for Topcon Positioning Systems where he was responsible for RTK and Machine Control. From 2005 to 2011, he worked for Javad GNSS as an RTK team leader. Dr. Rapoport has been a consultant at Huawei Technologies R&D Center in Moscow since 2011. Dr. Rapoport is professor of the control problems department of the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. He has authored 90 scientific papers, many patents, and conference presentations. He is a member of IEEE and the Institute of Navigation (ION). His research interests include navigation and control.
Financial support from the following company is gratefully acknowledged:
ARNS
Aeronautical Radio Navigation Service
ARP
Antenna reference point
AS
Antispoofing
ASK
Amplitude shift keying
B1
B1 Beidou carrier (1561.098 MHZ)
B2
B2 Beidou carrier (1207.14 MHz)
B3
B3 Beidou carrier (1268.52MHz)
BOC
Binary offset carrier
BPSK
Binary phase shift keying
C/A-code
Coarse/acquisition code (1.023 MHz)
CDMA
Code division multiple access
CIO
Celestial intermediary origin
CCRF
Conventional celestial reference frame
CEP
Celestial ephemeris pole
CORS
Continuously operating reference stations
CTP
Conventional terrestrial pole
CTRS
Conventional terrestrial reference system
DGPS
Differential GPS
DOD
Department of Defense
DOP
Dilution of precision
DOY
Day of year
E6
E6 Galileo carrier (1278.75 MHz)
ECEF
Earth-centered earth-fixed coordinate system
EOP
Earth orientation parameter
FAA
Federal Aviation Administration
FBSR
Feedback shift register
FDMA
Frequency division multiple access
FSK
Frequency shift keying
FOC
Full operational capability
GAST
Greenwich apparent sidereal time
GDOP
Geometric dilution of precision
GEO
Geostationary earth orbit
GIF
Geometry-free and ionospheric-free solution
GIM
Global ionospheric model
GLONASS
Global'naya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikkovaya Sistema
GNSS
Global navigation satellite system
GML
Gauss midlatitude functions
GMST
Greenwich mean sidereal time
GPS
Global positioning system
GPSIC
GPS Information Center
GPST
GPS time
GRS80
Geodetic reference system of 1980
HDOP
Horizontal dilution of precision
HMW
Hatch/Melbourne/Wübbena function
HOW
Handover word
IAG
International Association of Geodesy
IAU
International Astronomical Union
ICRF
International celestial reference frame
IERS
International Earth Rotation Service
IGDG
Internet-based dual-frequency global differential GPS
IGS
International GNSS Service
IGSO
Inclined geosynchronous satellite orbit
ISC
Intersignal Correction
ITRF
International terrestrial reference frame
IOC
Initial operational capability
ION
Institute of Navigation
IWV
Integrated water vapor
JD
Julian date
JPL
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
L1
L1 carrier (1575.42 MHz)
L2
L2 carrier (1227.6 MHz)
L5
L5 carrier (1176.45 MHz)
LAMBDA
Least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment
LC
Lambert conformal mapping
LEO
Low-earth orbiting satellite
LHCP
Left-hand circular polarization
MEO
Medium earth orbit
NAD83
North American datum of 1983
NAVSTAR
Navigation Satellite Timing and Ranging
NEP
North ecliptic pole
NGS
National Geodetic Survey
NIST
National Institute of Standards and Technology
NOAA
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
PCO
Phase center offset
OPUS
Online processing user service
OTF
On-the-fly ambiguity resolution
P-code
Precision code (10.23 MHz)
PCV
Phase center variation
PDOP
Positional dilution of precision
ppb
parts per billion
ppm
parts per million
PPP
Precise point positioning
PPS
Precise positioning service
PRN
Pseudorandom noise
PSK
Phase shift keying
PWV
Precipitable water vapor
QPSK
Quadature phase shift keying
RHCP
Right-hand circular polarization
RINEX
Receiver independent exchange format
RNSS
Radio navigation satellite services
RTCM
Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services
RTK
Real-time kinematic positioning
SA
Selective availability
SBAS
Satellite-based augmentation system
SINEX
Solution independent exchange format
SLR
Satellite laser ranging
SNR
Signal-to-noise ratio
SP3
Standard product #3 for ECEF orbital files
SPC
State plane coordinate system
SPS
Standard positioning service
SRP
Solar radiation pressure
SVN
Space vehicle launch number
SWD
Slant wet delay
TAI
International atomic time
TDOP
Time dilution of precision
TEC
Total electron content
TECU
TEC unit
TIO
Terrestrial intermediary origin
TLM
Telemetry word
TM
Transverse Mercator mapping
TOW
Time of week
TRANSIT
Navy navigation satellite system
URE
User range error
USNO
U.S. Naval Observatory
UT1
Universal time corrected for polar motion
UTC
Coordinate universal time
VDOP
Vertical dilution of precision
VLBI
Very long baseline interferometry
VRS
Virtual reference station
VSWR
Voltage standing wave ratio
WAAS
Wide area augmentation service
WADGPS
Wide area differential GPS
WGS84
World Geodetic System of 1984
WVR
Water vapor radiometer
Y-code
Encrypted P-code
ZHD
Zenith hydrostatic delay
ZWD
Zenith wet delay
Over the last decade, the development and application of GNSS (global navigation satellite system) has been unabatedly progressing. Not only is the modernization of the U.S. GPS (global positioning system) in full swing, the Russian GLONASS (Global'naya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema) system has undergone a remarkable recovery since its decline in the late 1990s to be now fully operational. The first static and kinematic surveys with the Chinese Beidou system are being published, and the signals of the European Galileo system are being evaluated. While many individuals might look back on the exciting times they were fortunate to experience since the launch of the first GPS satellite in 1978, there are many more enthusiastic individuals gearing up for an even more exciting future of surveying and navigation with GNSS. Yes, it seems like a long time has passed since sunset admirers on top of Mount Wachusett, seeing a GPS antenna with cables connected to a big “machine” in a station wagon were wondering if it would “take off,” or if you were “on their side,” or regular folks in a parking lot approaching a car with a “GPS” license plate were wondering if you had “such a thing.”
Much has been published on the subject of GNSS, primarily about GPS because of its long history. Admirably efficient search engines uncover enormous amounts of resources on the Internet to make an author wonder what else is there to write about. We took the opportunity of updating GPS Satellite Surveying to add strength by including two additional authors, while looking at rearranging the material in a way that reflects the maturity and permanency of the subject and de-emphasizes the news of the day or minor things that may have gotten the early pioneers of GPS excited.
Perhaps the most visible outcome of the rearrangement of the material for this edition is that GNSS in earnest starts only in Chapter 5, which may come as a surprise to the unexpected reader. However, if was determined that first presenting the geodetic and statistical foundations for GPS Satellite Surveying would be more efficient, and then focusing on GNSS, thus taking advantage of having the prerequisites available and not being side-tracked by explaining essential fill-in material. Therefore, there are two chapters devoted to least-squares estimation, followed by a chapter on geodesy. These three chapters clearly identify the traditional clientele this book tries to serve, i.e., those who are interested in using GNSS for high-accuracy applications. The other chapters cover GNSS systems, GNSS positioning, RTK (real-time kinematic), troposphere and ionosphere, and GNSS user antennas. There are nine appendices.
Chapter 2, least-squares adjustment, contains enough material to easily fill a regular 3-credit-hour college course on adjustments. The focus is on estimating parameters that do not depend on time. The material is presented in a very general form independently of specific applications, although the classical adjustment of a geodetic or surveying network comes to mind as an example. The approach to the material is fairly unique as compared to a regular course on least squares because it starts with the mixed model in which the observations and the parameters are implicitly related. This general approach allows for an efficient derivation of various other adjustment models simply by appropriate specifications of certain matrices. Similarly, the general linear hypothesis testing is a natural part of the approach. Of particular interest to surveying applications are the sections on minimal and inner constraints, internal and external reliability, and blunder detection.
Chapter 3, recursive least squares, represents new material that has been added to this fourth revision. In particular in view of RTK application where the position of the rover changes with time, it was deemed appropriate to add a dedicated chapter in which the estimation of time-dependent parameters is the focus. Consequently, we changed the notation using the argument of time consistently to emphasize the time dependency. A strength of this chapter is that it explicitly deals with patterned matrices as they occur in RTK and many other applications. Apart from the term “recursive least squares,” other terms might be “first-order partitioning regression” or “Helmert blocking,” that express the technique applied to these patterned matrices. Although Chapters 2 and 3 are related since there is only one least-squares method, Chapter 3 stands on its own. It also could serve easily as a text for a regular 3-credit-hour college course.
Chapter 4 is dedicated to geodesy. It provides details on reference frames, such as the ITRF (international terrestrial reference frame), as well as the transformation between such frames. The geodetic datum is a key element in this chapter, which is defined as an ellipsoid of defined location, orientation, and size and an associated set of deflection of the vertical and geoid undulations. Establishing the datum, in particular measuring gravity to compute geoid undulations, is traditionally done by geodesists. The fact that here it is assumed that all this foundational material is given indicates that geodesy is treated not as a science by itself in this book but rather as an enabling element that supports accurate GNSS applications. As the “model for all,” we present the three-dimensional (3D) geodetic model, which is applicable to networks of any size and assumes that the geodetic datum is available. In addressing the needs of surveying, the topic of conformal mapping of the ellipsoidal surface is treated in great detail. This includes, as a transitional product encountered along the way, computations on the ellipsoidal surface. It is well known that computing on the conformal mapping plane is limited by the area covered by the network since distortions increase with area. Additionally, the respective computations require the geodesic line, which is mathematically complicated, and the respective expressions are a result of lengthy but unattractive series expansions. Clearly, an attempt is made to point out the preference of the 3D geodetic model when there is the opportunity to do so.
Chapter 5, finally, introduces the various GNSS systems. In order to provide background information on satellite motions, the chapter begins with an elementary discussion of satellite motions, the Kepler elements that describe such motions, and the particularly simple theory of normal orbits, i.e., motion in a central gravity field. The disturbing forces that cause satellites to deviate from normal orbits are discussed as well. However, the material is not presented at the level of detail needed for accurate satellite orbit determination. We assume that orbit determination will continue to be handled by existing expert groups and that respective products will be available either through the broadcast navigation message or the International GNSS Service (IGS) and other agencies in the form of precise and/or ultra-rapid ephemeris and satellite clock data. This chapter includes new material on GPS modernization and on the GLONASS, Galileo, and Beidou systems. In the meantime, interface control documents are available for all these GNSS systems and posted on the Internet. The reader is advised to consult these documents and similar publications that expertly address the space segment.
Chapter 6 discusses in detail the various GNSS positioning approaches conveniently in “one place.” It begins with specifying the fundamental pseudorange and carrier phase equations. All relevant functions of these observables are then grouped and listed without much additional explanation. These functions are all well known; exceptions might be the triple-frequency functions. We introduce the “across” terminology in order to more easily identify the specific differencing. As such, we have the across-receiver, across-satellite, and across-time observation (single) differences, and then the traditional double-difference and triple-difference functions. A separate section is dedicated to operational details. That section includes everything one needs to know when carrying out high-accuracy positioning with GNSS. We especially stress the “GNSS infrastructure” that has established itself to support users. By this, we mean the totality of GNSS services provided by government agencies, user groups, universities, and above all the IGS and the (mostly) free online computing services. IGS provides products of interest to the sophisticated high-end GNSS user, while the computation services are of most interest to those responsible for processing field data. This is indeed a marvelous GNSS infrastructure that is of tremendous utility.
As to the actual GNSS positioning approaches, Chapter 6 is concerned with three types of approaches, each having been assigned a separate section. The first section deals with the navigation solution, which uses the broadcast ephemeris, and the traditional double-differencing technique with ambiguity fixing for accurate positioning. The double differences are formed on the basis of the base station and base satellite concept to conveniently identify the linear dependent double differences. We note that the reason for the popularity of the double-difference functions is the cancelation of common mode errors, such as receiver and satellite clock errors and hardware delays, as well as the tropospheric and ionospheric impacts on the carrier phases in the case of short baselines. The formation of double-difference functions is briefly contrasted with the equivalent undifferenced approach in which only the nonbase-station and nonbase-satellite observation contains an ambiguity parameter, while each of the others contains an epoch-dependent parameter. The latter approach results in a large system of equations that can be efficiently solved by exploring the pattern of the matrices.
In the second section, we discuss PPP (precise point positioning), CORS (continuous operating reference stations), and the classical differential correction that applies to RTK and PPP-RTK, which has been gaining popularity. In the case of PPP, the user operates one dual-frequency receiver and uses the precise ephemeris and satellite clock corrections to determine accurate position; the known drawback of the technique is long station occupation times. The use of the “classical” differential pseudorange and carrier phase correction is also well established, in particular in RTK. The differential correction essentially represents the discrepancies of the undifferenced observations computed at the reference stations. The user receives the differential correction of one or several reference stations and effectively forms double differences to determine its precise position. In the case of PPP-RTK, biases are transmitted to the user. These biases represent the difference of the satellite biases (clock error and hardware delay) and the base station bias (clock error and hardware delay). The user applies the received biases to the observations and carries out an ambiguity-fixed solution for precise point positioning. The advantage of the PPP-RTK approach is that the biases only primarily depend on the changes of the base station clock. Therefore, if the base station is equipped with an atomic clock, the variability of the transmitted biases can be reduced. Using the classical differential correction, the RTK user needs to estimate ambiguities, where and denote the number of receivers (reference plus rover) and satellites involved, whereas the PPP-RTK user only needs to estimate ambiguities. In the case of PPP-RTK, some of the work is shifted to the reference network since it computes the biases relative to the base station, whereas the differential corrections refer to the respective reference station and not a specific base station.
In the third section, we deal with TCAR (three carrier phase ambiguity resolutions). This technique is an extension of the popular dual-frequency technique of computing the wide-lane ambiguity first and independently from the actual position solution. In the case of TCAR, one uses triple-frequency observations to resolve the extra-wide-lane, wide-lane, and narrow-lane ambiguities first.
Additionally, a separate section is dedicated to ambiguity fixing. First, the popular LAMBDA (least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment) technique is discussed in detail. This is followed by material on lattice reduction. It was deemed important to add material to see how other disciplines deal with problems similar to ambiguity fixing in GNSS, and in doing so remaining open-minded as to other possible efficient solutions, in particular as the number of ambiguities increases when eventually all visible satellites of all systems are being observed.
Chapter 7 is dedicated to RTK. Since RTK includes static positioning as a special case, it is considered the most general approach. The technique is applicable to short baselines and long baselines if all effects are appropriately modeled. The chapter refers to a practical implementation of RTK algorithms that uses the formalism of recursive least squares given in Chapter 3, uses across-receiver differences as opposed to double differences, and is designed to include observations from all GNSS systems. Its recipes for software implementations are intended for specialists in geodetic software design. All examples are illustrated by way of real data processing.
Chapter 8 deals with the troposphere and ionosphere. The material is presented in a separate chapter in order to emphasis the major contribution of GPS in sensing the troposphere and ionosphere and, conversely, to understand the major efforts made to correct the observations for ionospheric and tropospheric effects in positioning. In addition to dealing with tropospheric refraction and various models for zenith delays and vertical angle dependencies, some material on tropospheric absorption and water vapor radiometers has been included. The chapter ends with a brief discussion on global ionospheric models.
Chapter 9 represents a major addition to this edition of the book. It is well known that multipath is affecting all GNSS positioning techniques, whether based on carrier phases or pseudoranges, since it is directly related to the ability of the user antenna to block reflected signals. Also realizing that geodesist and surveyors typically are not experts in antenna design, it was thought that a dedicated chapter on GNSS user antennas would provide an important addition to the book. We maintained the terminology and (mostly) also the notion that is found in the antenna expert community in the hope that it would make it easier for GPS Satellite Surveying readers to transition to the respective antenna literature if needed. Existing texts are often found to be too simple to be useful or too difficult for nonspecialists to understand. As an example of our approach, the Maxwell equations appear in the first section of the chapter but actually are not used explicitly except as support in the appendices. However, the majority of expressions are thoroughly derived and the respective assumptions are clearly identified. In several instances, however, it was deemed necessary to provide additional references for the in-depth study of the subject.
Chapter 9 is subdivided into seven sections. These sections deal with elements of electromagnetic fields and waves, antenna pattern and gain, phase center variation, signal propagation through a chain of circuits, and various antenna types and manufacturing issues and limitations. The material of this chapter is supplemented by six appendices which contain advanced mathematical material and proofs in compact form for readers who enjoy such mathematical depth. In general, the material is presented with sufficient depth for the reader to appreciate the possibilities and limitations of antenna design, to judge the performance of antennas, and to select the right antenna for the task at hand, in particular for high-accuracy applications.
Depending on one's view, one might consider GPS an old or new positioning and timing technology. Considering that the first GPS satellite was launched in 1978, one certainly can see it as old and well-established technology. However, given that new applications of GPS, and now we need to say GNSS, are continuously being developed, it is certainly also fair to characterize this as new technology. Whatever the reader's view might be, it is impossible to trace back all instances of important developments in GNSS unless, of course, one is willing to write a dedicated book on the history of GNSS. Nevertheless, the “pioneering years” of GPS were extremely uplifting as progress could be measured by leaps and bounds, and results were achieved at a level of quality that one had not expected. We present a brief, and probably subjective, review with a slant toward surveying of the major events up to the year 2000. Today, of course, progress continues to be made, in particular as other GNSS systems become operational; the progress is, however, now smooth and less steep.
Table 1.1 lists some of the noteworthy events up to the year 2000. GPS made its debut in surveying and geodesy with a big bang. During the summer of 1982, the testing of the Macrometer receiver, developed by C. C. Counselman at M.I.T., verified a GPS surveying accuracy of 1 to 2 parts per million (ppm) of the station separation. Baselines were measured repeatedly using several hours of observations to study this new surveying technique and to gain initial experience with GPS. During 1983, a first-order network densification of more than 30 stations in the Eifel region of Germany was observed (Bock et al., 1985). This project was a joint effort by the State Surveying Office of North Rhein-Westfalia, a private U.S. firm, and scientists from M.I.T. In early 1984, the geodetic network densification of Montgomery County (Pennsylvania) was completed. The sole guidance of this project rested with a private GPS surveying firm (Collins and Leick, 1985). Also in 1984, GPS was used at Stanford University for a high-precision GPS engineering survey to support construction for extending the Stanford linear accelerator (SLAC). Terrestrial observations (angles and distances) were combined with GPS vectors. The Stanford project yielded a truly millimeter-accurate GPS network, thus demonstrating, among other things, the high quality of the Macrometer antenna. This accuracy could be verified through comparison with the alignment laser at the accelerator, which reproduces a straight line within one-tenth of a millimeter (Ruland and Leick, 1985). Therefore, by the middle of 1984, 1 to 2 ppm GPS surveying had been demonstrated beyond any doubt. No visibility was required between the stations, and data processing could be done on a microcomputer. Hands-on experience was sufficient to acquire most of the skills needed to process the data—i.e., first-order geodetic network densification suddenly became within the capability of individual surveyors.
Table 1.1GPS Development and Performance at a Glance until 2000
1978
Launch of first GPS satellite
1982
Prototype Macrometer testing at M.I.T.
Hatch's synergism paper
1983
Geodetic network densification (Eifel, Germany)
President Reagan offers GPS to the world “free of charge”
1984
Geodetic network densification (Montgomery County, Pennsylvania)
Engineering survey at Stanford
Remondi's dissertation
1985
Precise geoid undulation differences for Eifel network
Codeless dual-band observations
Kinematic GPS surveying
Antenna swap for ambiguity initialization
First international symposium on precise positioning with GPS
1986
Challenger
accident (January 28)
10 cm aircraft positioning
1987
JPL baseline repeatability tests to 0.2−0.04 ppm
1989
Launch of first Block II satellite
OTF solution
Wide area differential GPS (WADGPS) concepts
U.S. Coast Guard GPS Information Center (GPSIC)
1990
GEOID90 for NAD83 datum
1991
NGS ephemeris service
GIG91 experiment (January 22–February 13)
1992
IGS campaign (June 21−September 23)
Initial solutions to deal with antispoofing (AS)
Narrow correlator spacing C/A-code receiver
Attitude determination system
1993
Real-time kinematic GPS
ACSM ad hoc committee on accuracy standards
Orange County GIS/cadastral densification
Initial operational capability (IOC) on December 8
1–2 ppb baseline repeatability
LAMBDA
1994
IGS service beginning January 1
Antispoofing implementation (January 31)
RTCM recommendations on differential GPS (Version 2.1)
National Spatial Reference System Committee (NGS)
Multiple (single-frequency) receiver experiments for OTF
Proposal to monitor the earth's atmosphere with GPS (occultations)
1995
Full operational capability (FOC) on July 17
Precise point positioning (PPP) at JPL
1996
Presidential Decision Directive, first U.S. GPS policy
1998
Vice president announces second GPS civil signal at 1227.60 MHz
JPL's automated GPS data analysis service via Internet
1999
Vice president announces GPS modernization initiative and third civil GPS signal at 1176.45 MHz
IGDG (Internet-based global differential GPS) at JPL
2000
Selective availability set to zero
GPS Joint Program Office begins modifications to IIR-M and IIF satellites
President Reagan offered GPS free of charge for civilian aircraft navigation in 1983, once the system became fully operational. This announcement can be viewed as the beginning of sharing arrangements of GPS for military and civilian users.
Engelis et al. (1985) computed accurate geoid undulation differences for the Eifel network, demonstrating how GPS results can be combined with orthometric heights, as well as what it takes to carry out such combinations accurately. New receivers became available—e.g., the dual-frequency P-code receiver TI-4100 from Texas Instruments—which was developed with the support of several federal agencies. Ladd et al. (1985) reported on a survey using codeless dual-frequency receivers and claimed 1 ppm in all three components of a vector in as little as 15 min of observation time. Thus, the move toward rapid static surveying had begun. Around 1985, kinematic GPS became available (Remondi, 1985). Kinematic GPS refers to ambiguity-fixed solutions that yield centimeter (and better) relative accuracy for a moving antenna. The only constraint on the path of the moving antenna is visibility of the same four (at least) satellites at both receivers. Remondi introduced the antenna swapping technique to accomplish rapid initialization of ambiguities. Antenna swapping made kinematic positioning in surveying more efficient.
The deployment of GPS satellites came to a sudden halt due to the tragic January 28, 1986, Challenger accident. Several years passed until the Delta II launch vehicle was modified to carry GPS satellites. However, the theoretical developments continued at full speed. They were certainly facilitated by the publication of Remondi's (1984) dissertation, the very successful First International Symposium on Precise Positioning with the Global Positioning System held at the National Geodetic Survey, and a specialty conference on GPS held by the American Society of Civil Engineers in Nashville in 1988.
Kinematic GPS was used for decimeter positioning of airplanes relative to receivers on the ground (Mader, 1986; Krabill and Martin, 1987). The goal of these tests was to reduce the need for traditional and expensive ground control in photogrammetry. These early successes not only made it clear that precise airplane positioning would play a major role in photogrammetry, but they also highlighted the interest in positioning other remote sensing devices carried in airplanes.
Lichten and Border (1987) reported repeatability of 2–5 parts in in all three components for static baselines. Note that 1 part in corresponds to 1 mm in 100 km. Such highly accurate solutions require satellite positions of about 1 m and better (we note that today's orbit accuracy is in the range of 5 cm). Because accurate orbits were not yet available at the time, researchers were forced to estimate improved GPS orbits simultaneously with baseline estimation. The need for a precise orbital service became apparent. Other limitations, such as the uncertainty in the tropospheric delay over long baselines, also became apparent and created an interest in exploring water vapor radiometers to measure the wet part of the troposphere along the path of the satellite transmissions. The geophysical community requires high baseline accuracy for obvious reasons, e.g., slow-moving crustal motions can be detected earlier with more accurate baseline observations. However, the GPS positioning capability of a few parts in was also noticed by surveyors for its potential to change well-established methods of spatial referencing and geodetic network design.
Perhaps the year 1989 could be labeled the year when “modern GPS” positioning began in earnest. This was the year when the first production satellite, Block II, was launched. Seeber and Wübbena (1989) discussed a kinematic technique that used carrier phases and resolved the ambiguity “on-the-way.” This technique used to be called on-the-fly (OTF) ambiguity resolution, meaning there is no static initialization required to resolve the ambiguities, but the technique is now considered part of RTK. The navigation community began in 1989 to take advantage of relative positioning, in order to eliminate errors common to co-observing receivers and make attempts to extend the distance in relative positioning. Brown (1989) referred to it as extended differential GPS, but it is more frequently referred to as wide area differential GPS (WADGPS). Many efforts were made to standardize real-time differential GPS procedures, resulting in several publications by the Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services. The U.S. Coast Guard established the GPS Information Center (GPSIC) to serve nonmilitary user needs for GPS information.
The introduction of the geoid model GEOID90 in reference to the NAD83 datum represented a major advancement that helped combine GPS (ellipsoidal) and orthometric height differences and paved the way for replacing much of leveling by GPS-determined heights. More recent geoid models are available.
During 1991 and 1992, the geodetic community embarked on major efforts to explore the limits of GPS on a global scale. The efforts began with the GIG91 [GPS experiment for International Earth Rotation Service (IERS) and Geodynamics] campaign and continued the following year resulting in very accurate polar motion coordinates and earth rotation parameters. Geocentric coordinates were obtained that agreed with those derived from satellite laser ranging within 10 to 15 cm, and ambiguities could be fixed on a global scale providing daily repeatability of about 1 part in . Such results are possible because of the truly global distribution of the tracking stations. The primary purpose of the IGS campaign was to prove that the scientific community is able to produce high-accuracy orbits on an operational basis. The campaign was successful beyond all expectations, confirming that the concept of IGS is possible. The IGS service formally began January 1, 1994.
For many years, users worried about the impact of antispoofing (AS) on the practical uses of GPS. AS implies switching from the known P-code to the encrypted Y-code, expressed by the notation P(Y). The purpose of AS is to make the P-codes available only to authorized (military) users. The anxiety about AS was considerably relieved when Hatch et al. (1992) reported on the code-aided squaring technique to be used when AS is active. Most manufacturers developed proprietary solutions for dealing with AS. When AS was implemented on January 31, 1994, it presented no insurmountable hindrance to the continued use of GPS. GPS users became even less dependent on AS with the introduction of accurate narrow correlator spacing C/A-code receivers (van Dierendonck et al., 1992), since the C/A-code is not subject to AS measures. By providing a second civil code on L2, eventually a third one on L5, and adding new military codes, GPS modernization will make the P(Y)-code encryption a nonissue for civilian applications, and at the same time, provide enhanced performance to civilian and military users.
A major milestone in the development of GPS was achieved on December 8, 1993, when the initial operational capability (IOC) was declared when 24 satellites (Blocks I, II, IIA) became successfully operational. The implication of IOC was that commercial, national, and international civil users could henceforth rely on the availability of the SPS (Standard Positioning Service). Full operational capability (FOC) would be declared on July 17, 1995, when 24 satellites of the type Blocks II and IIA became operational. Also, Teunissen (1993) introduced the least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment (LAMBDA), which is now widely used.
The determination of attitude/orientation using GPS has drawn attention for quite some time. Qin et al. (1992) report on a commercial product for attitude determination. Talbot (1993) reports on a real-time kinematic centimeter accuracy surveying system. Lachapelle et al. (1994) experiment with multiple (single-frequency) receiver configurations in order to accelerate the on-the-fly ambiguity resolution by means of imposing length constraints and conditions between the ambiguities. While much attention was given to monitoring the ionosphere with dual-frequency and single-frequency code or carrier phase observations, Kursinski (1997) discusses the applicability of radio occultation techniques to use GPS in a general earth's atmospheric monitoring system (which could provide high vertical-resolution profiles of atmospheric temperature across the globe).
The surveying community promptly responded to the opportunities and challenges that came with GPS. The American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM) tasked an ad hoc committee in 1993 to study the accuracy standards to be used in the era of GPS. The committee addressed questions concerning relative and absolute accuracy standards. The National Geodetic Survey (NGS) enlisted the advice of experts regarding the shape and content of the geodetic reference frame; these efforts eventually resulted in the continuously operating reference stations (CORS). Orange County (California) established 2000 plus stations to support geographic information systems (GIS) and cadastral activities. There are many other examples.
Zumberge et al. (1998a,b) report single-point positioning at the couple-of- centimeters level for static receivers and at the subdecimeter level for moving receivers. This technique became available at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) around 1995. The technique that requires dual-frequency observations, a precise ephemeris, and precise clock corrections is referred to as precise point positioning (PPP). These remarkable results were achieved with postprocessed ephemerides at a time when selective availability (SA) was still active. Since 1998, JPL has offered automated data processing and analysis for PPP on the Internet (Zumberge, 1998). Since 1999, JPL has operated an Internet-based dual-frequency global differential GPS system (IGDG). This system determines satellite orbits, satellite clock corrections, and earth orientation parameters in real time and makes corrections available via the Internet for real-time positioning. A website at JPL demonstrates RTK positioning at the subdecimeter for several receiver locations.
Finally, during 1998 and 1999, major decisions were announced regarding the modernization of GPS. In 2000, SA was set to zero as per Presidential Directive. When active, SA entails an intentional falsification of the satellite clock (SA-dither) and the broadcast satellite ephemeris (SA-epsilon); when active it is effectively an intentional denial to civilian users of the full capability of GPS.
