Guidelines for Combustible Dust Hazard Analysis -  - E-Book

Guidelines for Combustible Dust Hazard Analysis E-Book

0,0
114,99 €

-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.

Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

This book describes how to conduct a Combustible Dust Hazard Analysis (CDHA) for processes handling combustible solids. The book explains how to do a dust hazard analysis by using either an approach based on compliance with existing consensus standards, or by using a risk based approach. Worked examples in the book help the user understand how to do a combustible dust hazards analysis.

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern

Seitenzahl: 305

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017

Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



 

 

 

 

This book is one in a series of process safety and guideline and concept books published by the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). Please go to www.wiley.com/go/ccps for a full list of titles in this series.

GUIDELINES FOR COMBUSTIBLE DUST HAZARD ANALYSIS

 

 

 

 

CENTER FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS SAFETY OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS NEW YORK, NY

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.

 

A Joint Publication of the Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

Published simultaneously in Canada.

 

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission.

 

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.

 

For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at (317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.

 

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic formats. For more information about Wiley products, visit our web site at www.wiley.com.

 

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available.

 

ISBN: 978-1-119-01016-6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is our sincere intention that the information presented in this document will lead to an even more impressive safety record for the entire industry; however, neither the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), its consultants, CCPS Technical Steering Committee and Subcommittee members, their employers, their employers officers and directors, warrant or represent, expressly or by implication, the correctness or accuracy of the content of the information presented in this document. As between (1) AIChE, its consultants, CCPS Technical Steering Committee and Subcommittee members, their employers, their employers officers and directors, and (2) the user of this document, the user accepts any legal liability or responsibility whatsoever for the consequence of its use or misuse.

Contents

Cover

Series

Title

Copyright

Information

Contents

List of Tables

List of Figures

Acronyms and Abbreviations

Glossary

Acknowledgments

Preface

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Book

1.2 Book Road Map

1.3 References

2. Background

2.1 Nature of the Dust Fire and Explosion Problem

2.1.1 Dust Explosion Statistics

2.1.2 Case Study: Hoeganaes Corporation

Findings and Lessons

2.2 Requirements for Dust Fires and Explosions

2.2.1 Layer Fire.

2.2.2 Flash Fires and Explosions

2.3 Combustibility and Explosivity Parameters

2.3.1 Explosibility Screening Test

2.3.2 Deflagration Index, K

St

(bar-m/sec)

2.3.3 Maximum Pressure, P

max

(Bar)

2.3.4 Minimum Explosible Concentration, MEC (g/m

3

)

2.3.5 Minimum Ignition Energy, MIE (mJoules, mJ)

2.3.6 Minimum Auto Ignition Temperature, Cloud, MAIT (°C)

2.3.7 Layer Ignition Temperature, LIT (°C)

2.3.8 Limiting Oxygen Concentration, LOC (vol% O

2

)

2.3.9 Volume Resistivity (Ohm-m)

2.4 Comparison to Combustible Vapors

2.5 Effect of Parameters

2.6 Summary

2.7 References

3. The Hazards Within – Dust Inside Equipment

3.1 Methods of Prevention, Protection, Mitigation

3.1.1 Ignition Control

3.1.2 Inerting/Oxidant Control

3.1.3 Combustible Concentration Control

3.1.4 Deflagration Venting

3.1.5 Deflagration Suppression

3.1.6 Containment

3.1.7 Deflagration Isolation

3.2 Issues

3.2.1 Air/Material Separators

3.2.2 Size Reduction Equipment (grinders, mills, etc.)

3.2.3 Dryers

3.2.4 Silos/Hoppers

3.2.5 Portable Containers

3.2.6 Conveyors

3.2.7 Blenders/Mixers

3.2.8 Feeding into Vessels Having Flammable Vapor Atmospheres

3.3 Summary

3.4 References

4. Hazards of Dust External to Equipment

4.1 Case Study – Imperial Sugar

4.2 Issues Inside a Room or Building

4.3 Methods of Prevention and Protection

4.3.1 Control of Dust Deposits Outside of Equipment

4.3.2 Ignition Control

4.3.3 Damage Limiting Construction

4.4 Summary

4.5 References

5. Traditional Approach to Hazard Assessment and Control

5.1 Introduction

5.1.1 Process Safety Information (PSI)

5.1.2 Competent Team

5.2 Steps to the Traditional Approach

5.2.1 Step 1 – Is a combustible dust involved?

5.2.2 Step 2 – Determine Which Standards Apply

5.2.3 Step 3 - Determine Where Fire/Explosion Hazards Exist

5.2.4 Step 4 – Review Unit Operation vs. Standard Requirements for Prevention and Mitigation of Fires/Explosions

5.2.5 Step 5 – Make Recommendations

5.2.6 Step 6 – Document the DHA

5.2.7 Step 7 – Implement the Recommendations

5.3 Summary

5.4 References

6. Risk-based Approach to Dust Hazard Analysis

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Technique for a Risk-based DHA

6.2.1 Step 1: Identify Failure Scenarios

6.2.2 Step 2: Evaluate the Consequences

6.2.3 Step 3: Are the Consequences Tolerable?

6.2.4 Step 4: Estimate Likelihood and Risk

6.2.5 Step 5: Is the Risk Tolerable

6.2.6 Step 6: Recommend and Evaluate Solutions

6.2.7 Step 7: Is the Mitigated Risk Tolerable?

6.2.8 Step 8: Document Results

6.3 DHA Risk Assessment, Additional Requirements

6.3.1 DHA Leader Competency

6.3.2 Documentation

6.4 Managing Change and Updating Risk Assessment

6.5 Summary

6.6 References

7. Special Considerations: Combustible Dust Issues in Existing Facilities

7.1 Introduction

7.2 Existing Facilities and Combustible Dusts

7.2.1 Potential Issues

7.2.2 Issues Impact

7.2.3 Precautions

7.3 Summary

7.4 References

8. Worked Examples

8.1 Introduction

8.2 Example 1

8.2.1 Process Description – Example 1

8.2.2 Traditional DHA – Example 1

8.2.3 Risk-based DHA – Example 1

8.2.4 Comparison of Traditional vs. Risk-based Approach – Example 1

8.3 Example 2

8.3.1 Process Description 2

8.3.2 Traditional DHA

8.3.3 Risk-based DHA

8.3.4 Comparison of Traditional vs. Risk-based Approach – Example 2

8.4 Example 3

8.4.1 Process Description – Example 3

8.4.2 Traditional DHA – Example 3

8.4.3 Risk-based DHA – Example 3

8.5 Summary

8.6 References

Appendix A Regulations and Codes

A.1 Regulations

A.1.1 U.S.

A.1.2 International

A.2 Codes

References

Appendix B Additional Resources

B.1 Books

B.2 U.S. Chemical Safety Board Reports

B.3 Journal Articles

B.4 Other

Appendix C Data for Risk-based DHA

C.1 Probability Assessment of Process Unit Fire or Dust Explosion

C.1.1 Initiating Event Frequencies

C.1.2 Ignition Probabilities

C.1.3 Protection Layer PFDs

C.2 References

Appendix D Good Practices

D.1 Self Assessment

D.2 Housekeeping

D.2.1 Combustible Dust Housekeeping Inspection Checklist

D.3 Explosion Protection Methods

Appendix E DHA Roadmap

Notes for Figure E.1

Index

Eula

Guide

Cover

Contents

1 Introduction

Pages

C1

ii

iii

iv

v

xiii

xiv

xv

xvii

xviii

xix

xx

xxi

xxii

xxiii

xxiv

xxv

xxvi

xxvii

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

219

220

221

223

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

GLOSSARY

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

PREFACE

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Book

1.2 Book Road Map

1.3 References

2. Background

2.1 Nature of the Dust Fire and Explosion Problem

2.1.1 Dust Explosion Statistics

2.1.2 Case Study: Hoeganaes Corporation

Findings and Lessons

2.2 Requirements for Dust Fires and Explosions

2.2.1 Layer Fire.

2.2.2 Flash Fires and Explosions

2.3 Combustibility and Explosivity Parameters

2.3.1 Explosibility Screening Test

2.3.2 Deflagration Index, K

St

(bar-m/sec)

2.3.3 Maximum Pressure, P

max

(Bar)

2.3.4 Minimum Explosible Concentration, MEC (g/m

3

)

2.3.5 Minimum Ignition Energy, MIE (mJoules, mJ)

2.3.6 Minimum Auto Ignition Temperature, Cloud, MAIT (°C)

2.3.7 Layer Ignition Temperature, LIT (°C)

2.3.8 Limiting Oxygen Concentration, LOC (vol% O

2

)

2.3.9 Volume Resistivity (Ohm-m)

2.4 Comparison to Combustible Vapors

2.5 Effect of Parameters

2.6 Summary

2.7 References

3. The Hazards Within – Dust Inside Equipment

3.1 Methods of Prevention, Protection, Mitigation

3.1.1 Ignition Control

3.1.2 Inerting/Oxidant Control

3.1.3 Combustible Concentration Control

3.1.4 Deflagration Venting

3.1.5 Deflagration Suppression

3.1.6 Containment

3.1.7 Deflagration Isolation

3.2 Issues

3.2.1 Air/Material Separators

3.2.2 Size Reduction Equipment (grinders, mills, etc.)

3.2.3 Dryers

3.2.4 Silos/Hoppers

3.2.5 Portable Containers

3.2.6 Conveyors

3.2.7 Blenders/Mixers

3.2.8 Feeding into Vessels Having Flammable Vapor Atmospheres

3.3 Summary

3.4 References

4. Hazards of Dust External to Equipment

4.1 Case Study – Imperial Sugar

4.2 Issues Inside a Room or Building

4.3 Methods of Prevention and Protection

4.3.1 Control of Dust Deposits Outside of Equipment

4.3.2 Ignition Control

4.3.3 Damage Limiting Construction

4.4 Summary

4.5 References

5. Traditional Approach to Hazard Assessment and Control

5.1 Introduction

5.1.1 Process Safety Information (PSI)

5.1.2 Competent Team

5.2 Steps to the Traditional Approach

5.2.1 Step 1 – Is a combustible dust involved?

5.2.2 Step 2 – Determine Which Standards Apply

5.2.3 Step 3 - Determine Where Fire/Explosion Hazards Exist

5.2.4 Step 4 – Review Unit Operation vs. Standard Requirements for Prevention and Mitigation of Fires/Explosions

5.2.5 Step 5 – Make Recommendations

5.2.6 Step 6 – Document the DHA

5.2.7 Step 7 – Implement the Recommendations

5.3 Summary

5.4 References

6. Risk-based Approach to Dust Hazard Analysis

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Technique for a Risk-based DHA

6.2.1 Step 1: Identify Failure Scenarios

6.2.2 Step 2: Evaluate the Consequences

6.2.3 Step 3: Are the Consequences Tolerable?

6.2.4 Step 4: Estimate Likelihood and Risk

6.2.5 Step 5: Is the Risk Tolerable

6.2.6 Step 6: Recommend and Evaluate Solutions

6.2.7 Step 7: Is the Mitigated Risk Tolerable?

6.2.8 Step 8: Document Results

6.3 DHA Risk Assessment, Additional Requirements

6.3.1 DHA Leader Competency

6.3.2 Documentation

6.4 Managing Change and Updating Risk Assessment

6.5 Summary

6.6 References

7. Special Considerations: Combustible Dust Issues in Existing Facilities

7.1 Introduction

7.2 Existing Facilities and Combustible Dusts

7.2.1 Potential Issues

7.2.2 Issues Impact

7.2.3 Precautions

7.3 Summary

7.4 References

8. Worked Examples

8.1 Introduction

8.2 Example 1

8.2.1 Process Description – Example 1

8.2.2 Traditional DHA – Example 1

8.2.3 Risk-based DHA – Example 1

8.2.4 Comparison of Traditional vs. Risk-based Approach – Example 1

8.3 Example 2

8.3.1 Process Description 2

8.3.2 Traditional DHA

8.3.3 Risk-based DHA

8.3.4 Comparison of Traditional vs. Risk-based Approach – Example 2

8.4 Example 3

8.4.1 Process Description – Example 3

8.4.2 Traditional DHA – Example 3

8.4.3 Risk-based DHA – Example 3

8.5 Summary

8.6 References

Appendix A Regulations and Codes

A.1 Regulations

A.1.1 U.S.

A.1.2 International

A.2 Codes

References

Appendix B Additional Resources

B.1 Books

B.2 U.S. Chemical Safety Board Reports

B.3 Journal Articles

B.4 Other

Appendix C Data for Risk-based DHA

C.1 Probability Assessment of Process Unit Fire or Dust Explosion

C.1.1 Initiating Event Frequencies

C.1.2 Ignition Probabilities

C.1.3 Protection Layer PFDs

C.2 References

Appendix D Good Practices

D.1 Self Assessment

D.2 Housekeeping

D.2.1 Combustible Dust Housekeeping Inspection Checklist

D.3 Explosion Protection Methods

Appendix E DHA Roadmap

Notes for Figure E.1

INDEX

List of Tables

Appendix C

Table C.1.

Table C2.

Table C.3.

Table C.4.

Table C.5.

Table C.6.

Table C.7.

Table C.8.

Appendix D

Table D.1.

Chapter 2

Table 2.1

Table 2.2.

Table 2.3.

Table 2.4.

Chapter 3

Table 3.1.

Chapter 4

Table 4.1

Table 4.2.

Chapter 6

Table 6.1.

TABLE 6.3.

Table 6.5.

Chapter 8

Table 8.1.

Table 8.2.

Table 8.3.

Table 8.4.

Table 8.5.

Table 8.6.

Table 8.7.

Table 8.8.

Table 8.9

Table 8.10

Table 8.11.

Table 8.12.

Table 8.13.

Table 8.14.

Table 8.15.

Table 8.16.

Table 8.17

Table 8.18

Table 8.19

Table 8.20.

Table 8.21.

Table 8.22.

Table 8.23.

Table 8.24.

Table 8.25.

Table 8.26.

Table 8.27.

Table 8.28.

Table 8.29.

Table 8.30.

Table 8.31.

Table 8.32.

Table 8.33.

Table 8.34.

Table 8.35.

Table 8.36.

Table 8.37.

Table 8.38.

Table 8.39.

Table 8.40.

Table 8.41.

Table 8.42.

Table 8.43.

Table 8.44.

Table 8.45.

Table 8.46.

Table 8.47.

List of Illustrations

Appendix D

Figure D.1

Example Housekeeping Data Collection Sheet (source, Rodgers, Sam, Application of the NFPA 654 Dust Layer Thickness Criteria—Recognizing the Hazard, Process Safety Progress, V. 31, No. 1, March 2012.)

Figure D.2

Selection method for explosion protection

Appendix E

Figure E.1.

Roadmap through DHA process

Chapter 2

Figure 2.1.

Dust Incidents, injuries and fatalities, 1980–2005 (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.2.

Percent of incidents by industry (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.3.

Fine product collected from the Hoeganaes plant (penny shown for scale) (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.4.

Scene of January 2011 incident. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.5.

Mounds of iron dust along elevated surfaces at the Hoeganaes plant, February 3, 2011. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.6.

Iron dust on rafters and overhead surfaces, February 3, 2011. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.7.

Hole in 4-inch piping after the May 27, 2011 incident. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.8.

The fire triangle (Crowl 2011)

Figure 2.9.

Effect of surface area-to-mass ratios (Courtesy PSP)

Figure 2.10.

Flash fire square.

Figure 2.11.

Dust Explosion Pentagon (PSP, CEP)

Figure 2.12.

Secondary dust explosion (Courtesy OSHA)

Figure 2.13.

Dust accumulations at Imperial Sugar (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.14.

Damage at Imperial sugar (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.15.

DeBruce grain elevator after explosion (Taveau 2012)

Figure 2.16.

Schematic of 20 L Sphere (Courtesy Kuhner AG)

Chapter 4

Figure 4.1.

Motor cooling fins and fan guard covered with sugar dust, large piles of sugar cover the floor, Courtesy CSB

Figure 4.2.

Imperial Sugar Refinery. Courtesy CSB

Figure 4.3.

Imperial Sugar refinery after the explosion

Chapter 5

Figure 5.1a.

GESTIS Database search results for paraformaldehyde.

Figure 5.1b.

GESTIS Database search results for paraformaldehyde, < 23 µm.

Figure 5.1c.

GESTIS Database search results for paraformaldehyde, 560 µm.

Figure 5.2.

Example Process Flow Diagram

Chapter 6

Figure 6.1.

Technique for Selecting the Design Bases for Process Safety Systems (adapted from

Guidelines for Design Solutions for Process Equipment Failures

(CCPS 1998)).

Figure 6.2.

Example Qualitative Risk Matrix Example (CCPS 2008)

Chapter 6

Figure 8.1.

Example 1, Simple grinding process.

Figure 8.2.

Example 1, Simple grinding process with nodes identified

Figure 8.3.

Risk Matrix for worked examples (CCPS 2008).

Figure 8.3.

Grinder line feeding stirred vessel.

Figure 8.4.

Spray Dryer PFD

Pages

C1

ii

iii

iv

v

xiii

xv

xvii

xviii

xix

xx

xxi

xxii

xxiii

xxiv

xxv

xxvi

xxvii

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

14

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

47

48

50

51

52

53

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

74

75

76

77

80

81

82

83

84

85

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

183

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

219

220

221

223

224

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Particulate Materials involved in Reported Dust Explosions

Table 2.2. Secondary explosion incidents (Frank 2004 and Taveau 2006)

Table 2.3 Dust Hazard classes

Table 2.4 Parameter/Property Influence on Risk of Dust Explosibility

Table 3.1. Equipment Involved in Dust Explosions

Table 4.1 Division Determination Guidelines Based on Dust Layer Thickness

Table 4.2. Unscheduled Housekeeping

Table 6.1. Losses by Cause (Ignition Source)

TABLE 6.2. Consequence Categories for Qualitative Risk Matrix in Figure 6.2

TABLE 6.3. Frequency Categories for Qualitative Risk Matrix in Figure 6.2

TABLE 6.4. Risk Ranking/Response Categories for Qualitative Risk Matrix in Figure 6.2

Table 6.5. Example Risk Assessment documentation

Table 8.1. Hazard Properties for Example 1

Table 8.2. Node 1 – Traditional DHA, Bulk Bag Unloading

Table 8.3. Node 2 – Traditional DHA, Feed Hopper

Table 8.4. Node 3 - Traditional DHA, Hammer Mill

Table 8.5. Node 4 - Traditional DHA, Cyclone

Table 8.6. Node 5 – Traditional DHA, Dust Collector

Table 8.7. Node 6 – Traditional DHA, Product Hopper

Table 8.8. Node 7 – Traditional DHA, Packaging Unit

Table 8.9 Node 8 – Traditional DHA, Fugitive Dust Collector

Table 8.10 Node 9 – Traditional DHA, Enclosures/Rooms

Figure 8.3. Risk Matrix for worked examples (CCPS 2008).

Table 8.11. Consequence Categories for Risk Matrix Example in Figure 8.3.

Table 8.12. Frequency Categories for Risk Matrix Example in Figure 8.3.

Table 8.13. Node 1A - Risk-based DHA, Bulk Bag unloading

Table 8.14. Node 1B - Risk-based DHA, Bulk Bag unloading

Table 8.15. Node 2A - Risk-based DHA, Feed Hopper

Table 8.16. Node 2B - Risk-based DHA, Feed Hopper

Table 8.17 - Node 3A - Risk-based DHA, Hammer Mill

Table 8.18 - Node 3B - Risk-based DHA, Hammer Mill

Table 8.19 - Node 3C - Risk-based DHA, Hammer Mill

Table 8.20. Node 4A - Risk-based DHA, Cyclone

Table 8.21. Node 4B - Risk-based DHA, Cyclone

Table 8.22. Node 4C - Risk-based DHA, Cyclone

Table 8.23. Node 4D - Risk-based DHA, Cyclone

Table 8.24. Node 5A - Risk-based DHA, Dust Collector

Table 8.25. Node 5B - Risk-based DHA, Dust Collector

Table 8.26. Node 5C - Risk-based DHA, Dust Collector

Table 8.27. Node 5D - Risk-based DHA, Dust Collector

Table 8.28. Node 5E - Risk-based DHA, Dust Collector

Table 8.29. Node 6A - Risk-based DHA, Product Hopper

Table 8.30. Node 6B - Risk-based DHA, Product Hopper

Table 8.31. Node 7A - Risk-based DHA, Packaging Unit

Table 8.32. Node 7B - Risk-based DHA, Packaging Unit

Table 8.33. Node 7C - Risk-based DHA of Packaging Unit

Table 8.34. Node 8A - Risk-based DHA, Fugitive Dust Collector

Table 8.35. Node 8B - Risk-based DHA, Fugitive Dust Collector

Table 8.36. Node 9A - Risk-based DHA, Feed Hopper Room

Table 8.37. Node 9B, Risk-based DHA - Feed Hopper Room

Table 8.38. Selected Physical Properties of Methanol

Table 8.39. Node 6 - Traditional DHA, Product Hopper

Table 8.40. Node 7 - Traditional DHA, Mix Tank

Table 8.41. Node 6C - Risk-based DHA, Product Hopper

Table 8.42. Node 7A - Risk-based DHA, Mix Tank

Table 8.43. Node 1 - Traditional DHA of Spray Dryer

Table 8.44. Node 1A - Risk-based DHA of Spray Dryer

Table 8.45. Node 1B, Risk-based DHA, Spray Dryer

Table 8.46. Node 1C - Risk-based DHA, Spray Dryer

Table 8.47. Node 1D - Risk-based DHA, Spray Dryer

Table C.1. Probability Assessment of Fire or Explosion in a Process Unit (adapted from Dahn et al. 2000)

Table C2. Probability Matrix for Table C.1

Table C.3. Initiating Event Frequencies

Table C.4. Effectiveness of ignition source controls. (Daycock and Rew 2004)

Table C.5. Ignition probability vs. MIE (Howat 2006)

Table C.6 Ignition sensitivity guidance (VDI 2007)

Table C.7. Ignition ease criteria (Dahn, et al, 2000)

Table C.8. Protection layer PFDs

Table D.1. Combustible Dust Housekeeping Inspection Checklist

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1. Dust Incidents, injuries and fatalities, 1980–2005 (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.2. Percent of incidents by industry (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.3. Fine product collected from the Hoeganaes plant (penny shown for scale) (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.4. Scene of January 2011 incident. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.5. Mounds of iron dust along elevated surfaces at the Hoeganaes plant, February 3, 2011. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.6. Iron dust on rafters and overhead surfaces, February 2011. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.7. Hole in 4-inch piping after the May 27, 2011 incident. (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.8. The fire triangle (Crowl 2011)

Figure 2.9. Effect of surface area-to-mass ratios (Courtesy PSP)

Figure 2.10. Flash fire square

Figure 2.11. Dust Explosion Pentagon (PSP, CEP)

Figure 2.12. Secondary dust explosion (Courtesy of OSHA)

Figure 2.13. Dust accumulations at Imperial Sugar (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.14. Damage at Imperial sugar (Courtesy CSB)

Figure 2.15. DeBruce grain elevator after explosion (Taveau 2012)

Figure 2.16. Schematic of 20 L Sphere (Courtesy Kuhner AG)

Figure 4.1. Motor cooling fins and fan guard covered with sugar dust, large piles of sugar cover the floor, Courtesy CSB

Figure 4.2. Imperial Sugar Refinery. Courtesy CSB

Figure 4.3. Imperial Sugar refinery after the explosion

Figure 5.1a. GESTIS Database search results for paraformaldehyde.

Figure 5.1b. GESTIS Database search results for paraformaldehyde, < 23 µm

Figure 5.1c. GESTIS Database search results for paraformaldehyde, 560 µm

Figure 5.2. Example Process Flow Diagram

Figure 6.1 Technique for Selecting the Design Bases for Process Safety Systems (adapted from

Guidelines for Design Solutions for Process Equipment Failures

(CCPS 1998))

Figure 8.1. Example 1, Simple grinding process

Figure 8.2.

Figure 8.3.

Figure 8.3. Grinder line feeding stirred vessel

Figure 8.4. Spray Dryer PFD

Figure D.1.

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AIChE

American Institute of Chemical Engineers

ALARP

As Low as Reasonably Practicable

ASTM

American Society for Testing and Materials

BPCS

Basic Process Control System

CSB

U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

CCPS

Center for Chemical Process Safety

DHA

Dust Hazard Analysis

FIBC

Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container

FRPPE

Fire Retardant Personnel Protective Equipment

HAZOP

Hazard and Operability Study

HIRA

Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis

IEC

International Electrotechnical Commission

LFL

Lower Flammable Limit

LOC

Limiting Oxygen Concentration

LOPA

Layer of Protection Analysis

MEC

Minimum Explosible Concentration

MIE

Minimum Ignition Energy

MAIT

Minimum Auto Ignition Temperature of a Dust Cloud

MOC

Management of Change

MOOC

Management of Organizational Change

NFPA

National Fire Protection Association

OSHA

U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration

PFD

Probability of Failure on Demand

PFD

Process Flow Diagram

PHA

Process Hazard Analysis

PSI

Process Safety Information

PSM

Process Safety Management

RBPS

Risk-based Process Safety

RIBC

Rigid Intermediate Bulk Container

SCAI

Safety Controls Alarms and Interlocks

SDS

Safety Data Sheet

SHE

Safety, Health and Environmental

SFPE

Society of Fire Protection Engineers

SHIB

Safety Hazard Information Bulletin

SIS

Safety Instrumented Systems

SME

Subject Matter Expert

UFL

Upper Flammable Limit

UK

United Kingdom

U.S.

United States

GLOSSARY