How They Caught Ian Huntley
Dylan Frost© Copyright 2025 Dylan Frost
-
ContentsWho is Ian Huntley?How They Caught Ian Huntley Part 1How They Caught Ian Huntley Part 2How They Caught Ian Huntley Part 3What Happened to Ian Huntley Afterwards? Photo CreditWHO IS IAN HUNTLEY?Ian
Huntley is a notorious and much despised true crime figure in Britain.
You'd probably be hard pressed to find any living person in Britain
more hated than Ian Huntley. Huntley was convicted for killing the ten
year-old girls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in the small town of
Soham in Cambridgeshire in 2002. It was a truly awful case and a most
distressing and sad one for the media to cover. Sometimes with true
crime cases the killer is caught almost by accident (see Dennis Nilsen
and Jeffrey Dahmer) but it was some solid police work backed up by
information from the public which sealed the fate of Huntley. Huntley
made mistakes too which came back to haunt him but for a time he seemed
to be making a surprisingly good fist of riding out the situation and
hiding his guilt. It took nearly two weeks for the police to realise
that Huntley was the culprit and the person responsible for the missing
girls. Until that point he hadn't even been treated as a suspect. Huntley
was an active member of the group of volunteers who gave up their time
to help search for Holly and Jessica. He was hiding in plain sight.
Huntley would even invite police officers to his home for a cup of tea
during the search for the 'missing' girls. He cultivated friendly
relations with both the police and the media. It was all a carefully
orchestrated charade by Huntley. He had killed the girls and now he was
posing as the last person anyone would suspect of harming them. This
required a remarkable piece of acting but Huntley almost pulled it off.
On August the 4th, 2002, Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman had left a
late afternoon Sunday family garden barbecue to go to the sports centre
and buy some sweets from the vending machine in the village of Soham in
Cambridgeshire. They never returned. Ian Huntley lived just across the
road from the sports centre. He seized his chance to lure the girls
into his house and no one ever saw them again. The two girls
had an 8-30 PM curfew imposed by their parents so were usually always
home by that time. At 9-45 PM that night, the girls were still not back
and Jessica was not answering her Nokia mobile phone. It had
(suspiciously) been switched off. The two girls were reported missing
by their parents and a huge police search was quickly underway. Police
and volunteers searched through the night to no avail. This was a most
distressing case that quickly attracted national media attention. A
large media presence descended on Soham and news crews became a
familiar sight to locals. Ian Huntley was the 28 year-old caretaker at
Soham Village College. This was not the school Holly and Jessica
attended. They went to a primary school. Holly and Jessica knew
Huntley's girlfriend Maxine Carr because she used to work as a teaching
assistant at their school. They did not know Ian Huntley at all though.
They'd seen him around town a few times but that was about it. Ian
Huntley told the police he was probably the last person to speak to the
girls before they went missing because they had walked past his house
early in the evening while he was in the garden with his dog. Huntley
was shrewd. He volunteered this information because he thought it would
make him less suspicious. In reality he had murdered the girls and
hidden the bodies in woodland a forty minute drive away. Huntley said
he was washing his dog when the girls passed and after a brief
conversation (Huntley said the girls asked how Maxine was) they seemed
happy and cheerful when they wandered off. All of this was a lie.
Huntley then lingered on at the scene of the crime in the middle of a
police investigation and escalating media scrutiny of the case. In this
one might argue that he had little choice. To flee would be to draw
suspicion. He even ended up as a fairly regular person for local
reporters to interview. Huntley was meek and articulate when he spoke
to the media. He was perfectly calm and even conveyed a projection of
simulated empathy. Huntley was trusted in the community and
assisted the police in searching the school buildings and playing
fields. Huntley even had some contact with one of the parents of the
missing girls. He was playing the part of the concerned local citizen
almost perfectly. There was a very small window in time where Ian
Huntley might possibly have felt as if he was in control of events in
Soham. He might even have felt he stood a slim chance of getting away
with his crimes. The clips of Huntley on the news now are fascinating
in retrospect. It's amazing, given the circumstances, how calm and
collected he was and how he simulates sadness and empathy. It was often
said of Ian Huntley that he seemed to enjoy the attention when he
lingered on in Soham after murdering Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman.
Huntley gave television interviews for the nightly news and was
prominent at community meetings and candlelight vigils. He seemed to be
taking satisfaction in the (ultimately mistaken) belief that he had
pulled the wool over everyone's eyes. When the two girls in
Soham went missing and Ian Huntley was interviewed on television, no
one watching at home had a sudden sixth sense that he was the person
responsible. Huntley was not overtly and obviously suspicious. Huntley
had managed to move the bodies of Holly and Jessica after he killed
them to a quiet country ditch near RAF Lakenheath about twenty miles
away. He had then tried to burn the bodies to destroy the forensic
evidence. Once this was done he blended back into the Soham community
and posed as a good citizen who was upset about the missing girls and
ready to help the volunteers and police find them. So how did this
awful man finally get captured and convicted for his crimes? Well,
let's take a deep dive into how they captured Ian Huntley...HOW THEY CAPTURED IAN HUNTLEY PART 1The
disappearance of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman triggered national
media coverage and frantic activity in Soham. Mass searches were
undertaken by volunteers in the surrounding countryside. The town
became a hive of activity. Eyewitness sightings of the girls swamped
police telephones, CCTV was scoured, and any possible lead was pursued.
Child abduction cases in a 200 mile radius were researched to see if
there might be a connection. The police investigation to find the girls
was named Operation Fincham. The police quickly deployed a helicopter
and a police dog handler. Traffic police with four wheel drive vehicles
searched the local fens. There were soon television appeals by the
distressed parents - who were naturally desperate for any information
witnesses might have concerning the missing girls. However, the two
girls everyone was looking for proved to be elusive. The hours turned
to days with no sign or Holly or Jessica. This was potentially a tragic
development. In missing child cases the general rule is that if they
aren't found within 48 hours then they are most likely not alive
anymore. Soham clung to the desperate hope that Holly and
Jessica were still alive and would be returned to their families.
Sadly, they were already dead. They died just before seven in the
evening less than three hours before they were reported missing. Ian
Huntley was the only person in Soham who knew the girls were dead and
he was keeping that dark secret to himself. Some would contend that
Huntley might not have been the only person who knew the fate of the
girls as the police and volunteers went about their work. Some
observers in this case (including the prosecution at the trial) believe
that Huntley's girlfriend Maxine Carr knew more than she ever revealed.
Maxine Carr is a complex component in this case as we shall see in the
chapters which follow. There are conflicting theories concerning how
much Carr did or did not know. Despite vilification in the media
though, Maxine Carr was not Myra Hindley * - who she was (rather
unfairly and much to her annoyance) frequently compared to by the
tabloids. Maxine Carr wasn't even in Soham when the girls were
killed by Ian Huntley. She had nothing to do with the deaths of the
children. The salient question in relation to Maxine Carr is whether or
not she deduced or was told that the girls were dead and assisted
Huntley in covering this up. This theory contends that Maxine Carr
wanted to preserve her new life in Soham and her relationship with Ian
Huntley to the extent she was willing to assist in covering up the fact
the two girls had died in her house. It always felt like a stretch
though to attribute such heartless motives and cold behaviour to Maxine
Carr. She had always come across as a kind and responsible person when
she worked as a teaching assistant at Holly and Jessica's primary
school. Carr denied she knew anything about what had happened between
Huntley and the two victims and was found not guilty of assisting an
offender. Ian Huntley would later claim that he told Maxine Carr the
girls were dead and she orchestrated the clean up operation to keep
this a secret. There was never any proof this was the case though and
Ian Huntley is not exactly someone you'd take at his word. Carr
supplied Huntley with a false alibi which was of great assistance to
him but the evidence suggests she did this because she believed Huntley
to be innocent. The media arrived in Soham in some numbers
when the girls were reported missing. The local community were doing
all they could to help the police in any fashion available. There
were meetings to organise searches, vigils, and a general coming
together during this worrying time. One person who was very prominent
in all this community activity was Ian Huntley. As perhaps the last
person to see the girls before they vanished and the caretaker at the
school, Huntley quickly assumed a position of responsibility and
importance. He liased with police who required access to the school
grounds and was also sought out for media interviews. Huntley's
interviews were those little snippets you see on news bulletins where
they talk to local people in relation to some crime case that is
breaking. They were not exactly in depth interviews but Huntley was
bold nonetheless to acquiesce to them. He did not believe that a
brief news interview would be a risk to him. On the contrary, Huntley
believed that him speaking to journalists made him trustworthy. So you
had this missing child case going on and in the midst of it you had Ian
Huntley, the man who had killed the girls, attending vigils, having
cups of tea with police officers and getting on first names terms with
members of the media pack covering the story. It was all misdirection
by Huntley. He was not on any suspect radar at all in the early days of
the investigation. Huntley's girlfriend Maxine Carr had worked
as a teaching assistant at the school (St Andrews Primary School) where
Holly and Jessica were pupils and knew the two girls well. She was a
few years younger than Huntley at 25 and had met him in a nightclub.
Huntley is presumed to have lured the two girls into his house with the
(false) promise that Maxine Carr - their beloved former teaching
assistant - was inside waiting to talk to them. Huntley and Carr had
moved south to start a new life. Carr even had plans to start a family.
Though she resembled a meek and mild plain Jane, Maxine Carr was said
to be quite promiscuous and flirty. Huntley was always suspecting her
of having affairs. Carr liked to go to pubs and clubs and have a good
time. The relationship between Huntley and Carr could get volatile at
times with arguments but they had a loyalty to one another and their
relationship was clearly serious because they shared a house and had
moved one hundred miles away from home together. Huntley had quickly
embedded himself into the Soham community with his job at the school
and didn't stand out. He had a girlfriend (had Huntley lived alone it
is probable he would have become a suspect much sooner - almost
immediately in fact) and was trusted by the community. The school where
he was employed had found him to be dutiful, sensible and trustworthy.
Huntley seemed like a decent and kind young man at first glance. He
wasn't what he appeared to be though. It was all an act. The real Ian
Huntley was a monstrous character and the last person in the world you
would trust with a child. Ian Huntley was born in Grimsby in
1974. Though he was quite intelligent he left school early because he
wanted to get a job. Huntley was quite a transient sort of character
and moved around a lot before settling in Soham. Both Huntley and Carr
had a number of dead end factory jobs in the past so getting a job in a
school down south felt like a step up for both of them. Carr was
devastated with her teaching assistant job didn't become permanent.
Huntley was married when he was very young but it didn't last long and
he was left embittered when his wife moved in with his brother. What
the people of Soham didn't know was that Ian Huntley had a disturbing
past and an unhealthy interest in young girls who were still children.
Ian Huntley was basically a pedophile and a prolific one too. Back on
Humberside, where he used to live, he had been reported to the police
nearly a dozen times for relationships with or sexual assaults on
underage girls. Some of the victims were as young as thirteen. His
youngest victim was eleven. Huntley had also been arrested for burglary
and accused of rape. The school that employed him in Soham knew nothing
of Huntley's past. Had the police been aware of Huntley's dodgy past it
seems certain he would have been arrested as the prime suspect the
night that Holly and Jessica went missing. Huntley had somehow
managed to avoid any convictions mostly because the police couldn't get
an airtight case or the victims didn't want to go through a court case.
He had also been lucky because of a lack of co-ordination between
social services investigations and even the police. There was no doubt
that Huntley was a creep and a dangerous sexual predator. Amazingly,
despite all of this, he was able to move to Soham and a secure a job
working at a school. One would really like to think this couldn't
happen today. The headmaster at Soham Village College later admitted
that he didn't even bother to check Huntley's (fake) references when he
gave him a job. Huntley had not just been arrested on Humberside he had
also been investigated by the social services there and in Lincolnshire
more than once due to allegations that he was carrying on with underage
girls. In the wake of the Soham case, social services admitted they
failed to connect Huntley to all the incidents alleged to him and if
they had then action would have been taken and he might well have been
in prison up north rather than working as a school caretaker in Soham. At
the time the vetting system for background checks on employees was not
very sophisticated or organised. When he got a job at the school in
Soham, Huntley's details were then passed onto the police for a
background check but the police were swamped at the time because a new
background check system was about to come in and employers wanted to
use the old system (which was free) before it was phased out. As a
consequence of this, despite working at a school and being surrounded
by children, no detailed background check on Ian Huntley actually took
place in Cambridgeshire before he tragically murdered the two girls in
Soham. The police and social services on Humberside did not pass on any
details about Huntley. In fact, they had actually deleted a lot of the
information about him due to there being no convictions. Ian Huntley,
despite his dreadful history and obsession with underage girls, had
completely slipped through the net. He was able to start a new life in
Soham with a blank slate. No one had a clue about his past or what sort
of person he really was. Huntley could create a character for himself
to play in Soham and he played this part with great assurance. He was
now the salt of the earth school caretaker. A man that everyone seemed
to trust. The police in Cambridgeshire also made an initial
mistake because the background check on Huntley (when he got the job at
the school) was for the name Nixon not Huntley. Huntley had used his
mother's maiden name when he applied for the job. It seems pretty
obvious that Huntley did this to avoid his dodgy past on Humberside
coming to light. The police in Cambridgeshire later claimed that they
sent another fax to the police on Humberside asking for details about
Huntley and included both names (Nixon/Huntley) in the fax. The
response came back that Huntley was 'clean' and there was no trace of
him at all in the criminal record system. This is because he had no
actual convictions from court cases. The fact that Huntley had been
investigated for sexual activity with underage girls a dozen or so
times and been accused of rape and robbing a house was not passed onto
the police in Cambridgeshire. If all these details had been passed on
then there is no way Huntley would have been employed at a school. With
no job waiting for him (and a caretaker's cottage with reduced rent to
live in to boot) Huntley would not have been able to move to Soham in
the first place and Holly and Jessica would be alive today because they
never would have met Ian Huntley. Ian Huntley was what you
might describe as an unpleasant con artist. His life was a web of lies.
He was posing as the friendly school caretaker and pillar of the
village community but in truth he was an evil and deeply disturbed man.
One of the problems with any background check on Huntley is that
Humberside social services later admitted that the investigations into
Ian Huntley for underage sexual activity were done by different people
independent of other investigations. As a consequence of this they
failed to notice that Huntley was the connection and common denominator
in so many of these cases. So in the end, largely thanks to bureaucracy
and an unwieldy investigation and vetting system, Ian Huntley managed
to slip through the net. Lincolnshire police also said something
similar. They expressed regret for not charging and convicting Huntley
for the underage sex allegations he collected in that jurisdiction but
said that at the time they didn't detect a pattern. They didn't know
Huntley had done this a dozen or so times. There were profound
ramifications from this case with governmental investigations into how
Huntley had managed to be employed at a school with such a grim history
of sexual abuse and allegations. In 2007, Huntley was actually
convicted of sexually abusing an eleven year-old girl - a crime to
which he confessed and did not deny. By this stage Huntley was
obviously in prison for life so having those charges added to his slate
didn't make much difference to his circumstances. Ian Huntley
was a short man with close cropped hair that already showed signs of
turning grey despite the fact he wasn't yet out of his twenties. He
looked a bit like a slightly pudgy schoolboy despite being in his late
twenties. He had the faintest wisp of a moustache and chin beard - as
if he wanted to grow facial hair but wasn't actually capable of doing
so. As far as killers and criminals go, Huntley was an excellent actor.
He came across as sympathetic and upset when he spoke about the missing
girls to other members of the community and the media. Huntley was
pretty convincing posing as this concerned young man who was helping to
rally the community and find the girls. If you met Huntley in day to
life in those days when Holly and Jessica were missing you wouldn't
dream that he was the person who had killed the girls. Huntley came
across as gentle and harmless. Even a bit dorky. Huntley was therefore
able to blend into the fabric of town and fly under the radar. Most
people who encountered Huntley seemed to like him. On August
4, 2002, not long after late afternoon had slipped into early evening,
Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman had passed the house of Ian Huntley. It
seems that Holly and Jessica had left the family barbecue to go and buy
confectionery or crisps from the sports centre vending machine. The
sports centre and the school were very close to Huntley's house. Holly
Wells lived about 600 yards from Huntley's house she it wasn't as if
the two girls had walked very far. The parents of the girls thought
Holly and Jessica were in the bedroom while the barbecue went on. It
was only when someone checked on them after six they realised the two
girls were gone. Huntley, who said he was outside with his dog, did not
know the girls but they knew he was the boyfriend of Maxine Carr and
this was where she lived. So the two girls completely trusted Ian
Huntley and had no reason to be wary of him. The two girls believed
that Maxine Carr was in the house. Carr was away though visiting
relatives. Huntley did not tell the girls about this. He pretended
Maxine Carr was inside. Huntley's story of the girls wandering by just
as he happened to be outside with his dog is viewed to be suspect. The
more likely theory is that Huntley saw the girls walking in the
direction of his and so went outside to ensure there would be some sort
of interaction as they passed. Huntley invited the children
into the house to speak to Maxine Carr but Carr was in reality not even
home. She was away up north visiting relatives and Huntley was alone in
the house. Holly and Jessica had been taught at school not to trust
strangers but it is easy to see why they sensed no danger from Huntley.
They were 600 yards from Holly's house and presumed that Maxine Carr
was inside the caretaker's cottage. The two girls thought they were
completely safe. Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman both died soon after
entering the house of Ian Huntley. What actually happened in that house
is something that only Ian Huntley knows the precise details about. Due
to the decomposition of the bodies by the time they were found (and the
fact they had been partially burned) it was impossible to establish for
certain whether the two girls had been sexually assaulted but that was
clearly why Huntley had lured them into the house in the first place.
There is no other reason why Huntley would have engineered a situation
where two ten year-old girls he barely knew came into his house. His
urges and sick obsession with underage girls had got the better of him
and he saw opportunity when he spied the two girls walking in the
direction of his house. It seems certain that Huntley either
sexually assaulted and molested the girls or least attempted to do
this. When they fought back and struggled he killed them. It could be
the case that he killed them after molesting them because he knew he
couldn't just let them go home. Huntley needed the girls to stay silent
about what had happened and there was only one sure way to make certain
of that. The two girls were judged to have died through asphyxiation.
The pathologist couldn't be certain due to decomposition but there were
no injuries which suggested any other type of violence. Huntley had
strangled the girls. This is the generally accepted theory on what
happened. After the girls died, Huntley put the bodies in the boot of
his car and drove twenty miles away. He was quite lucky in that his
house was detached so he had relative privacy. After a forty minute car
journey, Huntley dumped the bodies in an irrigation ditch near the
Lakenheath airbase. This was a shrewd place to hide the bodies. It took
two weeks for the bodies to be found. A gamekeeper noticed them while
on a remote footpath. Huntley set fire to them to destroy any forensic
evidence and - so he hoped - destroy the bodies altogether and make
them impossible to identify. This was not wholly successful but the
damage and decomposition did make it impossible to establish if Huntley
had raped the girls.