Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
This book is intended for those who want to get started with carrying out improvement projects on the shop floor or in their own work environment. In addition, this book is intended for anyone who participates as a team member in a larger Lean or Six Sigma, Green or Black Belt project. The structure of this book is based on the ‘Continuous Improvement Maturity Model’ (CIMM). The CIMM framework connects various improvement methods such as Agile, Kaizen, Lean and Six Sigma and lists the most commonly applied techniques in the field of continuous improvement and quality management. The framework also connects the so-called hard and soft elements of the transformation process that organizations have to deal with if they want to implement continuous improvement more firmly. The CIMM framework is discussed in section. In terms of structure, this book follows the LSSA syllabus for Lean Six Sigma Orange Belt. All techniques mentioned in this syllabus are covered in this book. It is advised to also use the accompanying exercise book. Those wishing to obtain their certification are advised to read the information in Appendix A. Those who wish to apply Lean or Six Sigma at a Yellow, Green or Black Belt level are advised to read one of the other books in the series ‘Climbing the Mountain’ and use the corresponding exercise book.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 298
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Title:
Lean Six Sigma Orange BeltMindset, Skill set and Tool set
Series:
Climbing the Mountain
Author:
ir. H.C. Theisens
Graphics:
R. Verreijt
Publisher:
Van Haren Publishing, ’s-Hertogenbosch, www.vanharen.net
Edition:
First edition9789492240347/ 9789401809702NUR 100
Copyright:
© Van Haren Publishing
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Portions of information contained in this book are printed with permission of Minitab Inc. All rights reserved. MINITAB® and all other trademarks and logos for the company’s products and services are the exclusive property of Minitab Inc. All other marks referenced remain the property of their respective owners. See minitab.com for more information.
The structure of this book is based on the LSSA® Skill set (rev 3.2, 2021) and the Continuous Improvement Maturity Model – CIMMTM. You have the permission to share and distribute this model in its original form by referencing the publisher and author, (LSSA®, Theisens et. al., 2021).
Printed in the Netherlands
INTRODUCTION
HOW TO USE THIS BOOK
PREFACE
1 WORLD CLASS PERFORMANCE
1.1 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
1.1.1 Continuous Improvement history
1.1.2 Continuous Improvement values and principles
1.1.3 Continuous Improvement Maturity Model (CIMM)
1.1.4 Continuous Improvement roles and responsibilities
1.2 CUSTOMER VALUE
1.2.1 Voice of the Customer (VOC)
1.2.2 Critical to Quality (CTQ)
2 POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT
2.1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2.1.1 Vision & True North
2.1.2 Transformation roadmap
2.1.3 Performance and financial metrics
2.2 POLICY DEPLOYMENT
2.2.1 Management of change
3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
3.1 MANAGING A PROJECT
3.1.1 Project selection
3.1.2 Project charter
3.2 PROCESS IMPROVEMENT ROADMAPS
3.2.1 Kaizen roadmap (PDCA)
3.2.2 Lean Six Sigma roadmap (DMAIC)
3.2.3 Problem-Solving roadmap (8D)
3.2.4 Scrum
4 CIMM LEVEL I – CREATING A SOLID FOUNDATION (STRUCTURED)
4.1 PROFESSIONAL WORK ENVIRONMENT
4.1.1 Organized Work Environment (5S)
4.2 STANDARDIZED WORK
4.2.1 Standard Operating Procedure
4.2.2 Training Within Industry (TWI)
4.3 QUALITY MANAGEMENT
4.3.1 Quality Management System
5 CIMM LEVEL II – CREATING A CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT ENVIRONMENT (MANAGED)
5.1 VISUAL MANAGEMENT
5.1.1 Visual work environment
5.2 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
5.2.1 Daily stand-up meetings
5.2.2 Kaizen events and problem solving
5.3 BASIC QUALITY TOOLS
5.3.1 Brainstorm techniques
5.3.2 Visualization of data
6 CIMM LEVEL III – CREATING STABLE AND EFFICIENT PROCESSES (PREDICTABLE)
DEFINE
6.1 PROCESS MAPPING
6.1.1 High level process description and SIPOC
6.1.2 Process Flow diagram
MEASURE
6.2 PERFORMANCE METRICS
6.2.1 Performance metrics (Time)
6.2.2 Performance metrics (Quality)
6.3 BASIC STATISTICS
6.3.1 Data types and Measurement scales
6.3.2 Data collection tools
6.3.3 Descriptive statistics
ANALYZE
6.4 VALUE STREAM ANALYSIS
6.4.1 Value adding versus Non-value adding
6.4.2 Value Stream Mapping (Current State)
IMPROVE
6.5 REDUCING MUDA (WASTE)
6.5.1 Waste identification and elimination
6.6 REDUCING MURI (OVERBURDEN)
6.6.1 Flow
6.6.2 Work balancing
6.7 REDUCING MURA (UNEVENNESS)
6.7.1 Pull
6.7.2 Volume and Type leveling
6.8 VALUE STREAM IMPROVEMENT
6.8.1 Value Stream Mapping (Future State)
CONTROL
6.9 PROCESS AND QUALITY CONTROL
6.9.1 First Time Right (FTR)
6.9.2 Process FMEA (PFMEA)
6.9.3 Control Plan
6.10 TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
6.10.1 TPM principles
7 CIMM LEVEL IV – CREATING CAPABLE PROCESSES (CAPABLE)
MEASURE
7.1 STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES
7.1.1 Variation
7.1.2 Sampling
7.2 DISTRIBUTIONS
7.3 MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS
7.3.1 Measurement System Analysis (MSA)
ANALYZE
7.4 HYPOTHESIS TESTING AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS
7.4.1 Hypothesis testing
7.4.2 Confidence Intervals
7.5 TESTS FOR MEANS, PROPORTIONS AND VARIANCES
7.6 CORRELATION AND REGRESSION
7.6.1 Correlation coefficient
7.6.2 Regression analysis
7.7 PROCESS CAPABILITY AND PERFORMANCE
7.7.1 Process Capability
7.7.2 Short-term and Long-term Capability
IMPROVE
7.8 DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS (DOE)
7.8.1 Principles and terminology
CONTROL
7.9 STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL (SPC)
7.9.1 Control charts
8 CIMM LEVEL V – CREATING FUTURE-PROOF PROCESSES (SUSTAINED)201
APPENDIX A – THEORETICAL ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX B – REFERENCES
APPENDIX C – ABBREVIATIONS
INDEX
Would you consider buying a new smart phone from a certain phone provider if your friends keep complaining about connection problems or bad service? You probably would not. You also would probably not want to go to a school with a reputation for poor teaching, a hospital with a high rate of infections due to bad hygiene, or to eat in a restaurant that had served you bad food before. It does not matter what type of product or service we keep in mind; good service, good quality and a proper response time are important for all products and services that we buy. We expect a product to meet our expectations and to do so without defect.
Because of the internet, consumers can obtain a huge amount of information about the performance of products and organizations. It is very easy to compare prices of different suppliers and a product or service can be ordered at any time. If we book a restaurant we ask our friends if the food and service are good. If we have to wait two weeks for a new TV to be delivered we would probably order it somewhere else. If we call the service desk of our internet provider, we expect to talk to a person within a few minutes and they should have the knowledge to answer our question. If we buy a book, a jacket or a new laptop, we expect to receive the product within 24 hours. On top of that we expect companies to develop new models every year. Of course, we expect the price of a new model to be the same as the old model or even less. Do you, as a consumer, have any idea what this means for companies that have to develop and deliver these products? In past decades the increasing quality expectations and shorter Lead Times has had a huge impact on innovation, production, quality management and supply chain management. If a company is not able to keep up with this, it will not survive. Each year many companies, both small and large, have to close their doors because they cannot meet the increasing expectations of customers. Companies and organizations must constantly improve their knowledge of processes and quality control in response to increasing customer requirements for higher quality and shorter Lead Times.
Since process improvement has been going on for decades, process improvement techniques have been applied for decades. Different methodologies have been developed over the years like Lean Manufacturing, Kaizen, ‘Theory of constraints’ (TOC), ‘Total Quality Management’ (TQM), ‘Total Productive Maintenance’ (TPM) and Six Sigma. Many books have been published about process improvement and quality management by people like Deming, Imai, Taiichi Ohno and Eliyahu Goldratt. These methodologies have helped companies to make significant improvements. The methodology that is most suitable for your organization depends very much on where it stands right now and what it needs to do in order to reach a next level of performance. It is important to determine the level of Operational Excellence before an improvement program is deployed. Over past years, an integration has taken place based on best practices from improvement methodologies like Kaizen, Lean, Six Sigma and others. This book will explain these methodologies and an all-inclusive approach of the most commonly applied tools and techniques.
You may think that these methodologies are only applicable for car manufacturers or high-tech companies. It is correct that Lean and Six Sigma have made it possible for these types of companies to become better and faster. However, the same methodologies that served these manufacturers can also help service organizations, government and healthcare organizations to improve their quality, improve their response times and effectiveness, and lower their operational costs.
The road to the top of the mountain can be tough as the path is full of technical and organizational obstacles. You will discover that the journey is also a very interesting, instructive and satisfying one. The roadmap and techniques described in this book will give insight and understanding of a number of powerful tools and techniques to improve processes and quality. As the entire journey of becoming World Class cannot be taken overnight, you do not have to read this book entirely at once. We recommend that you begin by identifying the current state of your organization using the CIMM framework described in paragraph [1.1.3]. This will clarify which chapters will be interesting for you to read and which approach and techniques will be useful to apply in order to reach the next level.
This book is intended for those who want to get started with carrying out improvement projects on the shop floor or in their own work environment. In addition, this book is intended for anyone who participates as a team member in a larger Lean or Six Sigma, Green or Black Belt project.
Typical goals of a Lean project are to shorten Lead times or processing times. A Lean project can also aim to reduce operational costs or improve quality. The typical Lean approach is about identifying and eliminating so-called Waste. Different roadmaps can be applied for an improvement project such as the PDCA roadmap, the Value Stream Map or the DMAIC roadmap. Chapter [4] is about creating a solid basis to be able to take the step to Lean later. Techniques such as 5S, standardization and implementation of a quality management system are central at this level. Chapter [5] is about creating a continuous improvement culture and infrastructure. Visual management, daily stand-up meetings and the execution of many small improvement projects, Kaizen events, is the approach that is followed at this level. Chapter [6] is about creating stable and predictable processes by mapping the Value stream, reducing Waste and implementing the concepts of Flow and Pull. At the beginning of this chapter, an overview of recommended Lean techniques that can be used within a Lean DMAIC approach is given. This overview is a good starting point to help you in executing Lean projects. But remember that every improvement project will be different and selecting the right tools for a particular problem, at a particular level, is something you learn from experience.
Typical objectives of a Six Sigma project are to improve the ‘Capability’ (Cpk) of the process or product. In these types of projects, the focus is on reducing variation. Six Sigma projects are highly data-driven. This requires additional, often statistical, techniques. These techniques are usually applied by Green or Black Belts. To form a decisive Six Sigma team, it is recommended that team members are trained at Yellow or Orange Belt level. Yellow and Orange Belts know the Six Sigma approach, the terminology and have basic knowledge of the applied Six Sigma techniques. These techniques are discussed in Chapter [7], so that after studying this book you can be a valuable team member in a Green or Black Belt Six Sigma project.
The structure of this book is based on the ‘Continuous Improvement Maturity Model’ (CIMM). The CIMM framework connects various improvement methods such as Agile, Kaizen, Lean and Six Sigma and lists the most commonly applied techniques in the field of continuous improvement and quality management. The framework also connects the so-called hard and soft elements of the transformation process that organizations have to deal with if they want to implement continuous improvement more firmly. The CIMM framework is discussed in section [1.1.3].
In terms of structure, this book follows the LSSA syllabus for Lean Six Sigma Orange Belt [19.]. All techniques mentioned in this syllabus are covered in this book. It is advised to also use the accompanying exercise book. Those wishing to obtain their certification are advised to read the information in Appendix A. Those who wish to apply Lean or Six Sigma at a Yellow, Green or Black Belt level are advised to read one of the other books in the series ‘Climbing the Mountain’ and use the corresponding exercise book.
What would it be like to work in an organization where everything is predictable and runs smoothly? How would it be if you as a quality employee or process owner no longer have to deal with errors or incidents? How would it be for a manager if the strategy is clear, everyone knows what his or her contribution is and there is enough time for all projects? Unfortunately, reality is very different for most organizations. Even though organizations often look beautiful from the outside, there is still a lot to improve and processes are not nearly as stable and predictable as you would like.
Many organizations currently apply Lean Six Sigma as a holistic approach for continuous improvement. This approach is supplemented with principles and techniques from other improvement methods such as Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Theory of Constraints (TOC) or Agile. It is the combination of different methodologies that helps organizations best.
It is important to realize that applying improvement techniques is only one side of the story. The creation of a Continuous Improvement culture is also important. This covers matters such as strategy, leadership, organizational structure, change management and team development. This is also referred to as the 'Soft' side of continuous improvement, but in practice this is often the most difficult aspect. It is necessary to make people work in a different way. However, changing the organization is not easy. People, in general, do not like change unless they see the benefit of the change. Implementing an operational excellence successfully is a major challenge for management and Belts. This book has been a guidance for thousands already; it is useful as a guideline for selecting the right projects, successfully executing these projects and to lead change within an organization.
I want to thank everyone who helped with reviewing this book. In total, around 25 experts from various companies and organizations made a valuable contribution in the past years. I would also like to thank those who have contributed to the development of the 'Continuous Improvement Maturity Model' that has already helped many organizations in determining their improvement strategy. This model has been the basis for this book.
ir. H.C. Theisens
Master Black Belt Symbol B.V. (the Netherlands)
“It always seems impossible until its done.”
― Nelson Mandela ―
World Class Performance is the highest level that an organization can reach within its own sector by developing new products and services that exceed customer expectation in a very short time-to-market. In order to achieve World Class Performance, organizations need to develop and produce products and services that are the best in the world. Its production and delivery process should perform at the level of Operational Excellence and the organization should continuously improve its processes.
World Class Performance is not something that you can realize in a few months. Unfortunately, there is no golden roadmap to success. Working to become World Class is a long and bumpy journey with successes and setbacks. There will be roadblocks on the winding way to the top of the mountain. It is very unlikely that all people involved will reach the summit. Some will fall behind while others will drop off. Although this is not a joyful perspective, it is a path that must be followed if you want to stay competitive in the future as most of your competitors work on Continuous Improvement.
"We can't manage to deliver on time; We suffer a lot from errors and internal rejection; The involvement of employees in continuous improvement is not up to standard; We suffer a lot from disruptions in our supply chain; Our customers' requirements are becoming increasingly complex; We have no control over the work in process; We would like to involve our suppliers in our continuous improvement process."
Maybe you recognize some of the aforementioned issues within your organization or maybe other issues are at play. Each organization has the challenge to provide products and services with maximum value for their customers at the lowest possible cost and with the shortest delivery time. In order to achieve this, organizations must constantly work to improve their processes and develop the organization. Continuous Improvement is not only about improving the processes, but also about developing the organization and the employees. In this section we will review the culture, values, principles and roles within a Continuous Improvement organization.
In the last few years, the Lean and the Six Sigma philosophies have merged to Lean Six Sigma as a holistic view and approach for continuous improvement. Lean Six Sigma is a combination of Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma and uses a combined set of both Lean and Six Sigma tools. It also embraces best practices from other improvement methods like Total Quality Management, Total Productive Maintenance and Theory of Constraints. Lean Six Sigma includes a common goal of Lead Time reduction, operational cost reduction and overall quality improvement. Combining the synergies of Lean and Six Sigma provides organizations with greater speed, less variation and more bottom-line impact. Lately, many organizations have also added Agile to their continuous improvement strategy.
The origin of managing quality goes back thousands of years. The construction of the great pyramids of Cheops in 2560 BC could not have taken place without Quality Management. Even today, people are still amazed at how the 5.5 million tons of limestone, 8,000 tons of granite and 500,000 tons of cement were used in the construction of the Great Pyramid (Romer, 2007). The accuracy of the pyramids is such that the four sides of the base have an average deviation of only 58 millimeters in length (Cole, 1925). The base is horizontal and flat up to ±15 mm (Lehner, 1997). The ratio of the circumference to the height is equal to 2π with an accuracy higher than 0.05%. “Although the ancient Egyptians could not define the value of π precisely, we can conclude that they actually used it in practice" (Verner, 2003).
In the past two centuries, development has progressed rapidly and four industrial revolutions can be distinguished. The first industrial revolution (1780-1850) is characterized by the steam engine. In 1777, James Watt's first steam engine was set up in a quarry in Cornwall. With the arrival of the steam engine, it became possible to replace work done by people, animals or windmills with a machine. This period marks the transition to new production processes.
The second industrial revolution (1850-1970) is also known as the technological revolution. The best-known example of the second industrial revolution is Ford's production line. Henry Ford designed his first running assembly belt in 1913 for the T-Ford which unleashed a revolution in manufacturing. It was Henry Ford's goal to “Set the world on wheels" and produce an affordable car for the general public, with the simplest design at the lowest possible cost. This assembly line became the benchmark for mass production methods worldwide. The introduction of the diesel engine in 1894, as an alternative to the steam engine, made an important contribution to the further development of production lines. Furthermore, the First and Second World War had a major influence on the development of mass production.
The third industrial revolution (1970-2010) is characterized by the introduction of the computer in the 1950s. Digitization made it possible to transfer data from analogue data carriers to digital data carriers. This allowed information to be shared and consulted easily and anywhere in the world. Partly because of this, it became possible for companies to globalize their business. Production and delivery could take place worldwide, so that economies of scale were realized. Examples of the third industrial revolution are the use of 'Programmable Logic Controllers' (PLCs), 'Computer Aided Design & Manufacturing' (CAD / CAM), mechatronics and robotics. The first applications of robotics have been made in the Automotive industry, where, among other things, welding activities and assembly work is carried out by robots.
Currently we are at the beginning of the fourth industrial revolution (i4.0). The digital revolution, 'Internet of Things' (IoT), technology platforms and artificial intelligence play an important role in this era. The development of new technologies introduces a service mentality in the industry, similar to the development of Smartphones and Apps. Systems, machines and goods will communicate with each other about logistics, operations and performance while the human interference with the product will be reduced. Disciplines such as planning, engineering, delivery, maintenance, quality and service are further integrated. Industry 4.0 will drastically change the world in the coming decade and will require new business models. This is a threat to those who stand still while offering opportunities for those who are moving.
The concept of quality, as we think of it now, first emerged during the Industrial Revolution. Previously, products had been made from start to finish by the same person or team of people, with handcrafting and tweaking the product to meet 'quality criteria'. Mass production brought huge teams of people together to work on specific stages of production where one person would not necessarily complete a product from start to finish. In the late 19th century, pioneers such as Frederick Winslow Taylor and Henry Ford recognized the limitations of the methods being used in mass production at the time and the subsequent varying quality of output. Henry Ford (1863 – 1947) was the founder of Ford Motor Company and sponsor of the development of the assembly line technique of mass production. Many would say that Lean started with Henry Ford. Initially this was more a Lean initiative than a quality management initiative. Each T-Ford was supplied in any desired color (as long as it was black) and was supplied with a tool box in the trunk. Later, Ford emphasized standardization of design and component standards to ensure a standard product was produced. Management of quality was the responsibility of the Quality department and was implemented by inspection of product output to 'catch' defects.
Walter Andrew Shewhart (1891 – 1967) was an American physicist and known as the father of statistical quality control. He has set the basis for the control chart and bringing the production process into a state of ‘Statistical Process Control’ (SPC). He is also the founder of the PDCA circle (then called PDSA). The application of statistical control evolved during World War II where quality became a critical component of the war effort.
Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher (1890 – 1962) was an English statistician. According to some, he created the foundations for modern statistical science. His important contributions to statistics include the ‘Analysis of Variance’ (ANOVA) and ‘Design of Experiments’ (DOE).
After World War II, the Japanese welcomed the input of Americans Joseph M. Juran (1904 – 2008) and W. Edwards Deming (1900 – 1993). Juran was a management consultant and engineer. He wrote several influential books on quality management. This was illustrated by his ‘Juran Trilogy’, which is composed of three managerial processes: quality planning, quality control and quality improvement. He was one of the first to write about the Cost of Poor-Quality (COPQ). He is also known for the ‘Vital few versus Useful many’ statement, also known as the Pareto tool or ‘80/20 rule’. Deming was an American statistician after whom the Deming Prize for quality is named (1951). Deming proclaimed the PDCA circle for solving problems from Shewhart. Deming is regarded as having had more impact upon Japanese manufacturing and business than any other individual of Japanese heritage. He was only just beginning to win widespread recognition in the U.S. at the time of his death in 1993.
Quality management in the United States came much later as a direct response to the quality revolution in Japan. By the 1970s, U.S. industrial sectors such as automobiles and electronics had been broadsided by Japan’s high-quality competition. The U.S. response became known as ‘Total Quality Management’ and consists of continuously improving the ability to deliver high-quality products and services to customers. TQM typically relies heavily on the previously developed tools and techniques of quality control. TQM enjoyed widespread attention during the late 1980s and early 1990s before being overshadowed by ISO 9001, Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma. Many of its principles and tools, however, are still present in today’s quality management programs.
Masaaki Imai (born 1930) is a Japanese organizational theorist and management consultant, known for his work on quality management. Masaaki Imai wrote the groundbreaking book ‘Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success’ (1986). Through this book, the term Kaizen was introduced in the western world. In the same year, he founded the Kaizen Institute Consulting Group (KICG) to help Western companies introducing the concepts, systems and tools of Kaizen.
“It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop.”
Confucius
The Japanese word Kaizen means ‘Change for better’, in the same sense as the English word ‘Improvement’. Another definition of Kaizen is ‘To disassemble and put together again in a better way’. Today Kaizen is recognized worldwide as an important pillar of Continuous Improvement, especially small incremental improvements at the shop floor, also called the ‘Gemba’.
Within machine intensive factories such as food, pharma, chemical and automotive, ‘Total Productive Maintenance’ or ‘Total Productive Management’ (TPM) is a commonly used Continuous Improvement approach. The method focuses on the effective and efficient use of equipment by avoiding breakdowns, delays and machine-related rejections. This is achieved to ensure that more is produced using existing machinery.
Preventive maintenance was developed by U.S. factories that supplied the military during the Second World War. After the war, preventive maintenance was introduced in Japan (1951). Nippon Denso (Toyota Group) was the first company to introduce preventive maintenance plant wide (1960). Nippon Denso was the first company to receive the prestigious prize from the ‘Japanese Institute of Plant Maintenance’ (JIPM) for the implementation of TPM. In 1987 the first real TPM initiative in the U.S. was developed by the Kodak's Tennessee Eastman facility.
Lean focuses on stability and elimination of Waste. Lean Manufacturing began with Henry Ford who was the first person to truly integrate an entire production process. He did this by lining up fabrication steps in process sequence using Standardized Work and interchangeable parts. Ford called this ‘Flow’ production (1913). The problem with Ford’s system was its inability to provide variety. As mentioned, the Model-T was limited to one color and to one specification. As a result, all Model-T chassis were essentially identical until the end of production in 1926.
In the 1930s, and more intensely just after World War II (1950), Kiichiro Toyoda, Taiichi Ohno and others at Toyota started looking at Ford’s situation. While Ford was producing 8,000 vehicles per day, Toyota had produced only 2,500 vehicles in 13 years. Toyota wanted to scale up production but lacked the financial resources required for the huge quantity of inventory and subassemblies as seen at the Ford’s plant. What impressed Ohno even more than the visit to the Ford factory was the visit to the ‘Piggly Wiggly’ supermarket. At that time, Japan did not have a supermarket where customers could pick up their products themselves and where the stock on the shelves was frequently replenished from the warehouse. This process inspired Ohno to set up production in the Toyota factory in the same way and only produce what the next process needed. Toyota developed its famous 'Toyota Production System' (TPS) to avoid the problems and high costs of large inventories. TPS includes some of Ford's ideas, but also incorporated the philosophy of 'Just In Time' (JIT) and 'Pull', based on Piggly Wiggly's supermarket concept.
In 2008, Toyota became the world’s largest auto manufacturer in terms of overall sales. Over the past two decades, Toyota’s continued success has created an enormous demand for further knowledge concerning Lean Thinking. There are literally hundreds of books, papers and other resources currently available to this growing Lean Management audience.
The Lean thought process is thoroughly described in the book ‘The machine that changed the World’ (Womack and Jones, 1990) and in a subsequent volume, ‘Lean Thinking’ (1996), which specifically describes the five Lean principles. The concepts of Lean have been widely distributed around the world. Lean principles and tools are being applied in production, logistics and distribution, services, trade, health, construction, maintenance and even in government with the common goal of reducing turnaround time and operational costs while at the same time improving quality. One of the most important activities within Lean programs is the identification and elimination of Waste, also called ‘Muda’. Within a value stream eight types of waste can be distinguished: over-production, waiting, transport, over-processing, inventory, movement, defects and unused expertise. We will review value and waste in more detail in Chapter [6].
It was 1979 when Motorola was engaged in a painful process of self-discovery and began to realize the extent to which it had lost market share in many key segments, including televisions, car radios and semiconductors. That same year, during a company officers' meeting, Motorola's President and CEO Bob Galvin asked the question, ‘What is wrong with our company?’ Many officers and corporate chiefs began voicing the standard, politically correct excuses. Blame it on the Japanese, blame it on the economy in general, blame it on weak research and development. While all this was going on, a lone voice in the back of the room spoke up loudly and clearly saying, ‘I will tell you what is wrong with this company... Our quality stinks!’ That voice was Art Sundry, a sales manager for Motorola's most profitable business at the time. Everyone thought he would be fired for this ballsy assertion. How could someone make such a statement in such horrible and turbulent times? Surely Motorola had always been and still was among the world's best manufacturers, regardless of the hard times it was facing (Mikel J. Harry). Motorola was at a major turning point in its history. It could continue on a downward trend relative to competitors, or it could break that trend with an ambitious culture change and quality improvement initiative. This was the moment Motorola began its search for ways to eliminate Waste and improve its quality. Two Motorola engineers, Bill Smith and Mikel Harry, were credited for their pioneering work aimed at improving processes and for finding and resolving defects. Their work on process capability, tolerance, critical-to-quality characteristics and design margins laid much of the foundation for what today is called Six Sigma.
Six Sigma focuses on capability and reducing variation. Recognizing a link between fewer defects and lower costs, Motorola set out to incorporate this connection into their manufacturing processes, which they called ‘Six Sigma’. Motorola's Six Sigma quality program was so radical that managers were forced to think about the business differently. Applying these concepts to Motorola's electronics manufacturing delivered more than $2.2 billion in benefits within four years and $16 billion within 15 years. Motorola's CEO Bob Galvin cited the work of Bill Smith and Mikel Harry in achieving these benefits.
One of the companies that embraced the Six Sigma philosophy was General Electric (GE). GE Chairman, Jack Welch was told that Six Sigma could have a profound effect on GE’s quality. Although skeptical at first, Welch initiated a huge campaign called ‘the GE Way’. He made an official announcement and launched the quality initiative at GE's annual gathering of 500 top managers in January 1996. Welch described the program as ‘The biggest opportunity for growth, increased profitability and individual employee satisfaction in the history of the company’. His goal was to take quality to a whole new level and to become a Six Sigma quality company, producing nearly defect-free products and providing nearly defect-free services and transactions. Welch’s intention was to infuse quality into every corner of the company. He later called Six Sigma ‘the most difficult stretch goal’, but also suggested that it was ‘the most important initiative GE had ever undertaken’. General Electric saved more than $12 billion with Six Sigma in the five years after implementation.
In the previous paragraph we have discussed that within the domain of Continuous Improvement, various methodologies have been introduced over the past few decades. Each of these methodologies contains a certain set of tools and techniques, but before we review these, it makes sense to first review their values and principles. In this paragraph, we will discuss the values and principles of the most important methodologies like Kaizen, Lean, Six Sigma and Agile. Although there is no common, global set of values and principles of Continuous Improvement, there are certainly similarities between them. For instance, all have a strong foundation of improving customer value by involving the entire organization in the Continuous Improvement efforts.
Kaizen is about teamwork and empowerment. Participation is voluntary, but not without commitment. It is a bottom-up approach and encourages the involvement of all employees. As such, Kaizen is an approach that is often used to create a culture of Continuous Improvement. Kaizen is carried out at the place where it happens: the shop floor or ‘Gemba’. When problems occur, you should ‘Go to the Gemba’ rather than looking for solutions behind a desk or in a meeting room. Problems on the shop floor are experienced mostly by employees on the shop floor, rather than by managers sitting behind spreadsheets and PowerPoints. Employees on the shop floor very often have good ideas for solutions and improvements. The only issue is that managers forget to ask them and involve them. The five foundations of Kaizen are listed in Table 1.
Kaizen principle
Description
Teamwork
Create commitment for all
Personal discipline
Follow the standards
Better moral
Ensure good work morale
Quality circle
Follow the PDCA improvement cycles
Suggestion for improvement
Be receptive to new ideas and suggestions
Table 1 – Kaizen principles
Womack, Jones and Roos published two successful books entitled ‘The machine that changed the World’ (1990) and ‘Lean Thinking’ (1996) [21.]. Both books address the revolution in manufacturing represented by the Toyota Production System of the Toyota Corporation of Japan. They compared this way of working with the traditional mass production system that was used by other companies in the Western world. They described in their book ‘Lean Thinking’ the following five principles:
Lean principle
Description
Value
Define what is of value to the customer
Value stream
Identify the value stream and eliminate Waste
Flow
Create a constant flow
Pull
Deliver based on demand
Perfection
Continuously improve the process
Table 2 – Lean principles
We will describe each of these five principles briefly. In Chapter 6 we will review them in more detail and also show how applying these principles will result in shorter Lead Times and better quality.
The first principle is to define who your customer is and understand what the meaning of value is for your customer. Lean takes the customer as the starting point because in the end, satisfied customers are the reason for the existence of your organization and your job. But who is your customer? Sometime it is very clear to define your customer, but sometimes it is less obvious. Once you can point out who your customer is, it is also important to be able to define customer value, also called the ‘Voice of the Customer’.
The value stream is the operational process, or all concatenated activities that ultimately lead to the product or service as delivered to the customer. Not every activity can be classified as value-adding. A value adding activity must meet the following requirements: the customer is willing to pay for it; it must be performed correctly the first time and the activity must alter the product or service in a certain way. If one of these criteria is not met, the activity is classified as a non-value-adding activity or Waste. One of the main objectives of Lean is to identify and eliminate Waste.