Table of Contents
The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series
Title Page
Copyright Page
Acknowledgements
Introduction
PART ONE - “PEOPLE MAY SEE THINGS DIFFERENTLY, BUT THEY DON’T REALLY WANT TO”: ...
One - WHAT FOOLS WE WERE: MAD MEN, HINDSIGHT, AND JUSTIFICATION
“He Could Be Batman for All We Know”
“Every Day I Make Pictures Where People Appear to Be in Love. I Know What It ...
“Well, I Never Thought I’d Say This, but What Does the Research Say?”
“It’s Like Watching a Dog Play the Piano”
Two - “PEOPLE WANT TO BE TOLD WHAT TO DO SO BADLY THAT THEY’LL LISTEN TO ...
Mad Men, “Mad Masters,” and Mimesis
Seeing Is Believing
“Sally, Go Watch TV! ”
Don Draper Knows What Love Looks Like
“All That Is Solid Melts into Air”
Three - CAPITALISM AND FREEDOM IN THE AFFLUENT SOCIETY
“She Is . . . Well-off, Educated, with Plenty of Time to Shop”
A Deeper Bond with the Product
“Mommy, Are We Rich?”
“He’ll Never Play Golf Again”
Advertising Is Color-blind
In the Long Run We’re All Dead
Bringing Corporations and Government Together
PART TWO - “THERE IS NO BIG LIE, THERE IS NO SYSTEM, THE UNIVERSE IS ...
Four - PETE, PEGGY, DON, AND THE DIALECTIC OF REMEMBERING AND FORGETTING
Pete Campbell and Remembering
Peggy Olson and Forgetting
Don Draper and the Dialectic of Memory and Forgetting
“Have Done” with the Past
Five - THE EXISTENTIAL VOID OF ROGER STERLING
The Relentless Hedonist
The Last Man and the Will to Power
Authenticity
Existential Values
Six - EGOLESS EGOISTS: THE SECOND-HAND LIVES OF MAD MEN
Objectivism 101: A Brief Introduction
The Virtues Should Benefit Their Possessor
Don Draper Is Not Don Draper: The Vice of Dishonesty
A Night to Remember
The Nonconformist
The Whore-Child
The Universe Is Not Indifferent
Seven - AN EXISTENTIAL LOOK AT MAD MEN: DON DRAPER, ADVERTISING, AND THE ...
Branding the Self
“Freedom from Fear”: What Advertising Promises
Objectification and Underwear
Existentialism and Authenticity
Television and Existential Awakening
PART THREE - “AND YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPINESS IS?”: MAD MEN AND ETHICS
Eight - “IN ON IT”: HONESTY, RESPECT, AND THE ETHICS OF ADVERTISING
Respect and Honesty in Kant’s Ethics
Brainwashing on Madison Avenue
Marketing and Marriage
The Question of Ethical Advertising
Nine - CREATING THE NEED FOR THE NEW: “IT’S NOT THE WHEEL. IT’S THE CAROUSEL.”
Manufacturing Truth “on a Bed Made of Money”
Draperian Nihilism
The Camel, the Lion, and the Child
An Indifferent Universe
Efficiency Is the Highest Value
The Principium Individuationis
The Carousel
Creator versus Consumer
A Tragic Hero
Each of Us Would See Ourselves
Ten - “YOU’RE LOOKING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION”: MAD MEN AND THE ETHICS OF ADVERTISING
Truth, Lies, and Advertising
Public Manipulation and Coercion
Government
Sharing Moral Responsibility
“The Wrong Direction”?
Eleven - IS DON DRAPER A GOOD MAN?
The Good in Don Draper
Adultery and Lying on a Major Scale: That’s Not Good, Right?
Is Don Really a Bad Person?
Is There No Such Thing as a Good (or a Bad) Person?
Don Isn’t That Bad, Is He?
Nonetheless, Don Can Be a Real Heel
Twelve - DON DRAPER, ON HOW TO MAKE ONESELF (WHOLE AGAIN)
From Roger Sterling to Don Draper: Modernity in Transition
An Outsider on the Inside
Integrity in a Mad World
Just at Work, a Heel at Home
California Dreams
We’re Not in California Anymore . . .
Reconciliation Doesn’t Come in a Bottle
PART FOUR - “NO ONE ELSE IS SAYING THE RIGHT THING ABOUT THIS”: MAD MEN AND ...
Thirteen - “AND NOBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT, BUT YOU DO”: THE ARISTOTELIAN IDEAL OF ...
Friendship According to Aristotle: “I’ll Tell You Right Now, Don, I Don’t Like ...
Moral Development and Friendship as Understood by Aristotle
Contemporary Understanding of Moral Development in Kohlberg and Gilligan: “You ...
Morally Equivalent Characters in Mad Men: “Kids Today, They Have No One to Look ...
“To a Place Where We Know We Are Loved”
Fourteen - MAD WOMEN: ARISTOTLE, SECOND-WAVE FEMINISM, AND THE WOMEN OF MAD MEN
Peggy the Initiator: Dealing with Oppression at Work
Betty’s Reaction: Dealing with Repression at Home
Sassy but Passive: Joan and Suppression at Work and Home
Don’t Go Mad
Fifteen - “WE’VE GOT BIGGER PROBLEMS TO WORRY ABOUT THAN TV, OKAY?”: MAD MEN ...
The Evolution of Race on Mad Men
“We Thrive at Doing Business with People Who Hate Us”
One-Dimensional Characters
What’s on the Horizon?
Sixteen - “NEW YORK CITY IS A MARVELOUS MACHINE”: MAD MEN AND THE POWER OF ...
“You’re Going to Need a Stronger Stomach If You’re Going to Be Back in the ...
“People May See Things Differently, but They Don’t Really Want To”
“Madison Square Garden Is the Beginning of a New City on a Hill”
“I Have Been Watching My Life. It’s Right There. I Keep Scratching at It, ...
“Maybe I’m Not as Comfortable Being Powerless as You Are”
“I’m Enjoying the Story So Far, but I Have a Feeling It’s Not Going to End Well”
APPENDIX - It’s Not a List of Titles and Air Dates; It’s an Episode Guide
CONTRIBUTORS
INDEX
The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series
Series Editor: William Irwin
South Park and Philosophy Edited by Robert Arp
Metallica and Philosophy Edited by William Irwin
Family Guy and Philosophy Edited by J. Jeremy Wisnewski
The Daily Show and Philosophy Edited by Jason Holt
Lost and Philosophy Edited by Sharon Kaye
24 and Philosophy Edited by Richard Davis, JenniferHart Weed, and Ronald Weed
Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy Edited by Jason T. Eberl
The Office and Philosophy Edited by J. Jeremy Wisnewski
Batman and Philosophy Edited by Mark D. White andRobert Arp
House and Philosophy Edited by Henry Jacoby
Watchmen and Philosophy Edited by Mark D. White
X-Men and Philosophy Edited by Rebecca Housel andJ. Jeremy Wisnewski
Terminator and Philosophy Edited by Richard Brown andKevin Decker
Heroes and Philosophy Edited by David Kyle Johnson
Twilight and Philosophy Edited by Rebecca Housel andJ. Jeremy Wisnewski
Final Fantasy and Philosophy Edited by Jason P. Blahuta andMichel S. Beaulieu
Alice in Wonderland and Philosophy Edited by Richard B. Davis
Iron Men and Philosophy Edited by Mark D. White
True Blood and Philosophy Edited by George A. Dunn andRebecca Housel
Copyright © 2010 by John Wiley & Sons. All rights reserved
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey
Published simultaneously in Canada
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and the author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
For general information about our other products and services, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at (317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. For more information about Wiley products, visit our web site at www.wiley.com.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:
Mad men and philosophy : nothing is as it seems / edited by Rod Carveth and James B. South.
p. cm.—(The Blackwell philosophy and pop culture series)
Includes index.
ISBN 978-0-470-60301-7 (pbk.)
1. Mad men (Television program) I. Carveth, Rod. II. South, James B.
PN1992.77.M226M33 2010
791.45’72—dc22 2010005158
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
“I Think We Need to Salute That!”
The work on this book required getting into character. Much whiskey, many martinis, and countless cigarettes were consumed in an effort to make the book an authentic companion to Mad Men. In the interest of research, liaisons were entered into, suits were worn, and hostile takeovers by other publishers were thwarted.
Putting together a volume such as Mad Men and Philosophy requires a team of people working together—a team that deserves to be saluted for their efforts. We would like to thank our contributing authors, who met every tight deadline with high-quality work and good cheer. Unlike Bert Cooper, Bill Irwin, the Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series editor, offered invaluable assistance every step of the way, and Constance Santisteban at Wiley saw this book through press with all the efficiency and oversight of Joan Holloway.
Rod thanks James for such a great working relationship. Anytime James wants to collaborate on another project, Rod is game.
Rod has two other people he would also like to thank. First, Alana Carveth deserves a lot of credit for putting up with a father who was more distracted and forgetful than usual. It’s not easy to raise a parent at seventeen, but Alana really rose to the occasion. Second, Rod would like to thank Nina Spiller. Nina came into his life just as the book project was taking off. A fellow Mad Men fan, Nina provided love, support, and encouragement that made editing this volume much, much easier. Rod feels truly blessed to have two such wonderful women in his life.
James would like to thank Beth O’Sullivan and Lula Hopkins, the Allison and Hildy in his life, for putting up with his taking on a new project with the time commitments that entailed. He knows it made their jobs just a bit harder. Working with someone you’ve never met in person can be tricky. Rod made it very easy, and James enjoyed the collaborative effort.
Last but not least, we want to thank you, the reader, for your interest in the show and in this book. And we want to assure you that no one lost a foot throughout the entire process.
INTRODUCTION
“A Thing Like That”
Take off your shoes. Shut the door. Have a seat. Kick back in your Eames chair. Admire that Rothko print. Pour your favorite drink. And prepare to enter the philosophical world of Mad Men, or at least the world of philosophers thinking and writing about Mad Men.
Mad Men premiered in July 2007 to immediate critical acclaim. Set in 1960, the series seemed both exotic and nostalgic. It showed a past that many of us had not lived through, and for those who had lived through it, the episodes shined a new light on old experiences. Over the course of the first three seasons, Mad Men reminded us of many uncomfortable truths, from the prevalence of drinking and smoking to the systemic sexism, racism, and homophobia that were ever-present in the early 1960s. It also reminded us of a glamour long since lost as we became reacquainted with the fashions of the era, the luxurious civility of airline flight, and the forgotten manners and mores of a previous generation. And Mad Men poignantly dramatized the reactions of people to events we still commemorate today. By taking us inside a world in which people struggled to understand these events as they occurred, and showing us those people in their historical context, Mad Men helped us understand better both the past and the present.
Few series have distinguished themselves as quickly as Mad Men. But the audience didn’t need the Golden Globes or the Screen Actors Guild to tell them Mad Men was something special, something delightfully disturbing. This show’s audience knows quality when it sees it. From the first episode viewers were immersed in a morally ambiguous atmosphere of corporate and family life. We were introduced to likeable characters performing questionable, and at times clearly immoral, actions. Somehow we found ourselves rooting for Don Draper to sell cigarettes, get away with dalliances, and conceal his true identity. And we found Sterling Cooper an alluring and attractive setting, all the while cringing at the subservient role of the women in the office.
The chapters that follow were written by Mad Men fans for Mad Men fans who can’t help but think about the characters, events, and issues long after they turn off the television. Whether you want to think more about the role of women in the series, or the morality of advertising, or the way to lead a meaningful life, you will find guidance in these pages.
Because we didn’t have a big advertising budget for this book, we had to write this introduction ourselves. Philosophers aren’t known as great salesmen, but hopefully this little pitch was enough to close the deal. Please read on.
PART ONE
“PEOPLE MAY SEE THINGS DIFFERENTLY, BUT THEY DON’T REALLY WANT TO”: MAD MEN AND PROBLEMS OF KNOWLEDGE AND FREEDOM
One
WHAT FOOLS WE WERE:MAD MEN, HINDSIGHT, AND JUSTIFICATION
Landon W. Schurtz
That Mad Men takes place in the 1960s is no accident. The creator, Matthew Weiner, could have made a series about modern advertising executives, but he chose not to. By showing us the differences between Don Draper’s time and ours, Mad Men deftly underscores the ways in which we aren’t so different after all. One thing does stand out, however, at least for me. Every time I watch the show, I find myself asking, “Were these people just stupid?”
Let me explain myself. I don’t actually think that the people on the show are idiots. Nonetheless, sometimes they just seem so dense. There are things in their world that it seems like they ought to know, but, for some reason, don’t.
For instance, here in the twenty-first century we know that one of the most successful ad campaigns of all times is Marlboro’s use of the “Marlboro Man.” Cowboy hat pulled low to shade his squinty gaze, he stares into the empty distance, alone in rugged country—the Marlboro Man is still an iconic figure, even though he hasn’t been seen in a decade. The campaign traded on the notion of smoking as manly, the smoker as a hardy individualist. It was a runaway success.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!