Principles and Applications of Fermentation Technology E-Book
193,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Wissenschaft und neue Technologien
- Sprache: Englisch
The book covers all aspects of fermentation technology such as principles, reaction kinetics, scaling up of processes, and applications. The 20 chapters written by subject matter experts are divided into two parts: Principles and Applications. In the first part subjects covered include: * Modelling and kinetics of fermentation technology * Sterilization techniques used in fermentation processes * Design and types of bioreactors used in fermentation technology * Recent advances and future prospect of fermentation technology The second part subjects covered include: * Lactic acid and ethanol production using fermentation technology * Various industrial value-added product biosynthesis using fermentation technology * Microbial cyp450 production and its industrial application * Polyunsaturated fatty acid production through solid state fermentation * Application of oleaginous yeast for lignocellulosic biomass based single cell oil production * Utilization of micro-algal biomass for bioethanol production * Poly-lactide production from lactic acid through fermentation technology * Bacterial cellulose and its potential impact on industrial applications
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 767
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2018
Ähnliche
Contents
Cover
Title page
Copyright page
Part I: Principles of Fermentation Technology
Chapter 1: Fermentation Technology: Current Status and Future Prospects
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Types of Fermentation Processes
1.3 Enzymes
1.4 Antibiotics
1.5 Fed-Batch Cultivation
1.6 Application of SSF
1.7 Future Perspectives
References
Chapter 2: Modeling and Kinetics of Fermentation Technology
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Modeling
2.3 Kinetics of Modeling
2.4 Conclusion
References
Chapter 3: Sterilization Techniques used in Fermentation Processes
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Rate of Microbial Death
3.3 How do Sterilants Work?
3.4 Types of Sterilization
3.5 Sterilization of the Culture Media
3.6 Sterilization of the Additives
3.7 Sterilization of the Fermenter Vessel
3.8 Filter Sterilization
3.9 Sterilization of Air
References
Chapter 4: Advances in Fermentation Technology: Principle and Their Relevant Applications
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Basic Principle of Fermentation
4.3 Biochemical Process
4.4 Fermentation Methodology
4.5 Biochemical Mechanism
4.6 Fermentation and its Industrial Applications
4.7 Relevance of Fermentation
4.8 Conclusion
References
Chapter 5: Fermentation Technology Prospecting on Bioreactors/Fermenters: Design and Types
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Bioreactor and Fermenter
5.3 Types of Fermenter and Bioreactor
5.4 Design and Operation
5.5 Classification of Bioreactor
5.6 Types of Fermenter/Bioreactor
5.7 Conclusion
References
Part II: Applications of Fermentation Technology
Chapter 6: Lactic Acid and Ethanol: Promising Bio-Based Chemicals from Fermentation
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Generalities about LA and Ethanol
6.3 Fermentation Methods to LA and Ethanol Production
6.4 Potential Raw Materials for Biotechnology Production
6.5 Challenges in LA and Ethanol Production
6.6 Integrated Ethanol and LA Production
6.7 Concluding Remarks
References
Chapter 7: Application of Fermentation Strategies for Improved Laccase Production
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Major Factors Influencing Fermentation Processes for Laccase Production
7.3 Type of Cultivation
7.4 Biotechnological Application of Laccases
7.5 Conclusion
References
Chapter 8: Use of Fermentation Technology for Value Added Industrial Research
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Fermentation
8.3 Biofuel Production
8.4 1,3-Propanediol
8.5 Lactic Acid
8.6 Polyhydroxyalkanoates
8.7 Exopolysaccharides
8.8 Succinic Acid
8.9 Flavoring and Fragrance Substances
8.10 Hormones and Enzymes
8.11 Conclusion
References
Chapter 9: Valorization of Lignin: Emerging Technologies and Limitations in Biorefineries
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Lignocellulosic Material: Focus on Second Generation Biofuel
9.3 Composition and Biosynthesis of Lignin
9.4 Bioengineering of Lignin
9.5 Lignin Separation and Recovery
9.6 Lignin-Based Materials and Polymers
9.7 Lignin-Based Fuels and Chemicals
9.8 Concluding Remarks and Future Prospects
References
Chapter 10: Exploring the Fermentation Technology for Biocatalysts Production
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Biotechnology Fermentation
10.3 Production of Enzymes
References
Chapter 11: Microbial CYP450: An Insight into Its Molecular/Catalytic Mechanism, Production and Industrial Application
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Microbial Cytochrome P450
11.3 Extent of P450s in Microbial Genome
11.4 Structure, Function and Catalytic Cycle
11.5 Strain Engineering for Improved Activity
11.6 Producion Strategies of CYP450
11.7 Applications
11.8 Conclusion
References
Chapter 12: Production of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids by Solid State Fermentation
12.1 Introduction
12.2 PUFAs Production by SSF
12.3 Microorganisms Used for PUFAs Production by SSF
12.4 Main Process Parameters
12.5 Bioreactors
12.6 Extraction of Microbial Oil
12.7 Concluding Remarks
References
Chapter 13: Solid State Fermentation – A Stimulating Process for Valorization of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks to Biofuel
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Potential of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biofuel Production
13.3 Structure of Lignocellulose
13.4 Biomass Recalcitrance
13.5 Pre-Treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass
13.6 Hydrolysis
13.7 Limitations of Enzymatic Hydrolysis
13.8 Fermentation
13.9 Concluding Remarks
References
Chapter 14: Oleaginous Yeasts: Lignocellulosic Biomass Derived Single Cell Oil as Biofuel Feedstock
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Oleaginous Yeasts: A Brief Account
14.3 Lignocellulosic Biomass and its Deconstruction
14.4 Biochemistry of Lipid Biosynthesis
14.5 Genetic Modification for Enhancing Lipid Yield
14.6 Fermentative Cultivation, Recovery of Yeast Lipids as SCO and Production of Biofuel
14.7 Characterization of Yeast SCO: Implications towards Biodiesel Properties
14.8 Concluding Remarks
References
Chapter 15: Pre-Treatment of Lignocellulose for the Production of Biofuels
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Lignocellulose
15.3 Parameters Effecting the Hydrolysis of Lignocellulose
15.4 Pre-Treatment of Lignocellulose
15.5 Case Studies of Biofuels
15.6 Conclusion
Reference
Chapter 16: Microalgal Biomass as an Alternative Source of Sugars for the Production of Bioethanol
16.1 Overview
16.2 Aquatic Species as Alternative Feedstocks for Low-Cost-Sugars
16.3 Environmental Sustainability of Microlgal-Based Biofuels
16.4 Prospects for Commercialization of Microalgal-Based Bioethanol
16.5 Conclusions and Perspectives
References
Chapter 17: A Sustainable Process for Nutrient Enriched Fruit Juice Processing: An Enzymatic Venture
17.1 Introduction
17.2 Conventional Methods for Juice Processing and Their Drawbacks
17.3 Enzyme Technology in Different Step of Juice Processing
17.4 Conclusion
References
Chapter 18: Biotechnological Exploitation of Poly-Lactide Produced from Cost Effective Lactic Acid
18.1 Introduction
18.2 Need for Ideal Substrates for Lactic Acid Production
18.3 Role of Microbes and Biochemical Pathways in Lactic Acid Production
18.4 Purification of Lactic Acid
18.5 Methods of Synthesis of PLA
18.6 Applications of PLA
18.7 Conclusion
References
Chapter 19: A New Perspective on Fermented Protein Rich Food and Its Health Benefits
19.1 Introduction
19.2 Sources of Fermented Protein
19.3 Protein in Biological System
19.4 Bioabsorbability of Protein
19.5 Fermented Protein-Rich Food Products
19.6 Conclusion
References
Chapter 20: An Understanding of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Potential Impact on Industrial Applications
20.1 Introduction
20.2 Cultivation Conditions for Production of Bacterial Cellulose
20.3 Bioreactor System for Bacterial Cellulose
20.4 Plant Cellulose vs. Bacterial Cellulose
20.5 Compositional View of Bacterial Cellulose
20.6 Molecular Biology of Bacterial Cellulose
20.7 Importance of Genetically Modified Bacteria in Bacterial Cellulose Production
20.8 Applications of Bacterial Cellulose in Different Industrial Sector
20.9 Conclusion
References
Index
End User License Agreement
Guide
Cover
Copyright
Contents
Begin Reading
List of Illustrations
Chapter 2
Figure 2.1: A flowchart describing the cyclic nature of modeling process.
Figure 2.2: The components of modeling.
Figure 2.3: The schematic diagram explaining the control region in two types of bioreactor system.
Figure 2.4: The type of sensors.
Chapter 4
Figure 4.1: Fermentation process.
Figure 4.2: Principle of fermentation.
Figure 4.3: Detailed biochemical process of fermentstion.
Figure 4.4: Process of fermentation in laboratory.
Figure 4.5: Conversion of glucose into different fermented products using micro-organisms.
Figure 4.6: Various uses of fermented probiotics.
Figure 4.7: Relevance of fermentation technology.
Chapter 5
Figure 5.1: Fermentation process.
Figure 5.2: Fermenter [2].
Figure 5.3: Laboratory scale fermenter [12].
Figure 5.4: Pilot scale fermenter [13].
Figure 5.5: Industrial scale fermenter [14].
Figure 5.6: Fermentor with its parts [17].
Figure 5.7: Classification of fermenter and bioreactor.
Figure 5.8: Stirred tank fermentor [18].
Figure 5.9: Airlift Fermentor [18].
Figure 5.10: A bubble column fermentor [18].
Figure 5.11: Packed bed reactor [22].
Figure 5.12: Fluidized reactor [24].
Figure 5.13: Membrane bioreactor method diagram [27].
Chapter 6
Figure 6.1: LA enantiomers.
Figure 6.2: Commercial uses of LA [21].
Figure 6.3: Feedstock’s for ethanol production [30].
Figure 6.4: Integrated ethanol and LA production [93].
Figure 6.5: Scheme of the integrated first (1G) and second (2G) ethanol production process from sugarcane and sugarcane bagasse [99].
Chapter 7
Figure 7.1: Proposed mechanism of substrate oxidation in the absence (a) or in the presence (b) of redox mediators.
Chapter 11
Figure 11.1: Sequence alignment between different cytochromes P450s from different bacteria; Effect of different mutational study in
Bacillus megaterium
CypP450 and residual diversity in other bacteria.
Figure 11.2: Active site of CYP450. Amino acid residues have been represented by their three letter codes. Dotted lines indicate H-bonding.
Figure 11.3: Catalytic cycle of CYP450.
Figure 11.4: Active site analysis of CYP450 mutants with selective amino acid substitutions.
Chapter 13
Figure 13.1: Schematic diagram indicating the process of second generation bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomasses
Chapter 14
Figure 14.1: The main components and structure of LCB from the plant source.
Chapter 15
Figure 15.1: Schemetic diagram of pretreatment process leading to different biofuel formation.
Figure 15.2: Types of pretreatment.
Figure 15.3: Types of process leading to biohydrogen formation.
Chapter 16
Figure 16.1: Microalgae culture systems. (a) Raceway pond; (b) circular pond; (c) horizontal tubular PBR; (d) airlift PBR, (e) flat panel, (f) hybrid system, raceway pond coupled to parallel horizontal tubes.
Figure 16.2: Schematic of microalgae biomass production systems.
Figure 16.3: Comparison of biomass processing for bioethanol production from different raw materials.
Chapter 17
Figure 17.1: General steps involved in juice processing.
Chapter 18
Figure 18.1: Possible substrates for Lactic acid production.
Figure 18.2: An overview of metabolic pathways showing utilization of different carbon sources for the production of Lactic acid.
Figure 18.3: An overview of methods of synthesis of PLA.
List of Tables
Chapter 2
Table 2.1: Some fermentation control software in recent days.
Chapter 5
Table 5.1: Differences between fermenter and bioreactor [11].
Chapter 6
Table 6.1: Properties of LA [15].
Table 6.2: LA production using different substrates and microorganism.
Table 6.3: Ethanol production from various feedstocks.
Chapter 7
Table 7.1: Example of organisms capable of producing laccase enzymes.
Table 7.2: Example of different carbon sources used by microorganisms during laccase production.
Table 7.3: Example of different nitrogen sources used by microorganisms during laccase production.
Table 7.4: Example of different inducers used by microorganisms during laccase production.
Table 7.5: Example of microbial laccase productions through SmF.
Table 7.6: Example of microbial laccase productions through SSF using different agro wastes as substrate.
Table 7.7: Biotechnological applications of microbial laccases.
Chapter 8
Table 8.1: List of some flavonoids and their active component synthesize by microorganism using waste materials.
Chapter 9
Table 9.1: Lignin-based polymers/products and their economic importance.
Chapter 10
Table 10.1: Examples of enzyme application.
Chapter 11
Table 11.1: Effect of different mutational study in
Bacillus megateriu
m
CYP450.
Table 11.2: Different strategies for CYP450 purification.
Chapter 12
Table 12.1: PUFA production by various microorganisms and substrates in SSF.
Chapter 13
Table 13.1: Compositions of different lignocellulosic biomass (% dry basis).
Table 13.2: Enzymatic saccharification of different pretreated feed stocks using cellulolytic enzymes.
Table 13.3: Advantages and limitations of organisms used in lignocellulosic-based bioethanol fermentation.
Chapter 14
Table 14.1: Composition of various LCB raw materials.
Table 14.2: Biomass hydrolysis strategies.
Table 14.3: Biomass and lipid production by various oleaginous yeasts on different lignocellulosic wastes.
Table 14.4: Medium and process optimization for SCO production by oleaginous yeasts.
Table 14.5: Characterization of microbial oil and their implication in fuel properties.
Chapter 15
Table 15.1: Comparisons of bioethanol production from various lignocellulosic biomass at different pretreatment procedures.
Table 15.2: Comparisons of acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) production from various lignocellulosic biomass at different pretreatment procedures.
Table 15.3: Comparisons of biohydrogen production from various lignocellulosic biomass at different pretreatment procedures.
Table 15.4: Comparisons of biogas production from various lignocellulosic biomass at different pretreatment procedures.
Chapter 16
Table 16.1: Biomass composition of some representative microalgal strains.
Table 16.2: Comparative bioethanol yields from microalgal biomass.
Table 16.3: Comparison between the major bioethanol crops and algae.
Chapter 19
Table 19.1: Fermented food products and their important health benefit.
Chapter 20
Table 20.1: Different strains producing different yield of bacterial cellulose by using different carbon source.
Pages
ii
iii
iv
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
Scrivener Publishing100 Cummings Center, Suite 541JBeverly, MA 01915-6106
Publishers at ScrivenerMartin Scrivener ([email protected])Phillip Carmical ([email protected])
Principles and Applications of Fermentation Technology
Edited by
Arindam Kuila
Vinay Sharma
This edition first published 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA and Scrivener Publishing LLC, 100 Cummings Center, Suite 541J, Beverly, MA 01915, USA© 2018 Scrivener Publishing LLCFor more information about Scrivener publications please visit www.scrivenerpublishing.com.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Wiley Global Headquarters111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials, or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
ISBN: 978-1-119-46026-8
Part IPRINCIPLES OF FERMENTATION TECHNOLOGY
Chapter 1Fermentation Technology: Current Status and Future Prospects
Ritika Joshi, Vinay Sharma and Arindam Kuila*
Bioscience & Biotechnology Department, Banasthali University, Rajasthan, India
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Abstract
This chapter deals with the current status and future prospects of the fermentation technology (FT). It discusses the different types of fermentation processes (solid-state and submerged fermentation) as well as the different types of enzyme and antibiotics production by FT. In addition, various industrial applications (enzyme production, organic acid production, biofuel production, etc.) of solid-state fermentation are also discussed. Also discussed are the future prospects of FT with regard to enhanced value product development.
Keywords: Fermentation technology, solid-state fermentation, enzyme production, biofuel production
1.1 Introduction
Fermentation technology is defined as field that involves the use of microbial enzymes for production of compounds that have application within the energy production, material, pharmaceutical industries, chemical, and food industries [1].
It appears naturally in various foods. The human beings are using it from the ancient times for preservation and organoleptic properties of food. It is a well-established technology of the ancient time used for food preservation, production of bread, beer, vinegar, yogurt, cheese, and wine. From time to time, it has got refined and diversified [2].
It is the biological process in which various microorganisms such as yeast, bacteria, and fungi are involved in the conversion of complex substrate into simple compounds which are useful to humans (enzymes production, metabolites, biomass, recombinant technology, and biotransformation product) on industrial scale. Organic acid and alcohol are the main products of fermentation. In this process, there is liberation of secondary metabolites like antibiotics, enzymes, and growth factors [3, 4].
They acquire biological activity so they are also known as bioactive compounds. These compounds contain plant and food constituents in small amount which are very nutritional. Various bioactive compounds consist of secondary metabolites, for example phenolic compounds, growth factors, food pigments, antibiotics, mycotoxins, and alkaloids [5, 6]. The constituent of phenolic compounds are flavonoids, tannins, and phenolic acids. Flavanones, flavonols, flavones, anthocyanidins, and isoflavones are some major classes of flavonoids. Flavonoid comprises largest collection of plant phenolics where most of them are naturally occurring compounds [7].
According to their diverse perspectives, food and beverage are used in modern industrial fermentation processes. On the bases on different parameters such as environmental parameters and organisms required for fermentation, these techniques have become more advanced.
Generally, bioreactor is required in the middle of this process which can be arranged on the basis of their feeding of the batch, continuous and fed-batch fermentation, immobilization process. In the presence of the available amount of oxygen, mixing of substrate take place in single and mixed culture in submerged fermentation (SmF) [8].
1.2 Types of Fermentation Processes
1.2.1 Solid-State Fermentation
Solid-state (or substrate) fermentation (SSF) are define as fermentation that place in solid supporting, non-specific, natural state, and low moisture content. In this process, substrates such as nutrient rich waste can be reused. Bran, bagasses, and paper pulp are the solid substrates used in SSF. Since the process is slow the fermentation of substrate takes long time. So, the discharge of the nutrients is in controlled manner. It requires less moisture content so it is the best fermentation technology used for fungi and microorganism. However, this process is not applicable for bacteria because this fermentation cannot be used for organism that requires high water condition [9].
1.2.2 Submerged Fermentation
In SmF, microorganism required a controlled atmosphere for proficient manufacture of good quality end products; attain optimum productivity and high yield.
Batch, fed-batch, or continuous modes are used in industrial bioreactors for the production of different type of microorganism in broad range [8].
For the manufacture of alcoholic beverages (whisky, beer, brandy, rum, and wine), preservatives or acidifiers (lactic acids, citric, and vinegar) are used in food industry and for flavor enhancers (monosodium glutamate) or sweeteners (aspartate) amino acid are used in submerged batch cultivation.
In this part, there are different ways of submerged cultivation using microorganisms in bioreactors. Here we have discussed briefly about typical features and advantages and faults of each fermentation methods are displayed. Lastly, the production of microorganism in liquid medium in various type of food industrial product has been determined as the most important application for continuous, batch, and fed-batch cultivation.
1.2.2.1 Batch Cultivation
Batch culture is a closed system which works under aseptic condition. In these cultivations, inoculums, nutrients, and medium are mixed in the bioreactor in which the volume of the culture broth remains constant.
1.2.2.2 Substrates Used for Fermentation
It is very important to select a good substrate as the product of fermentation extremely varies. This technique is used for optimization of every substrate. This is mainly due to the cause that microorganism reacts in different way in every substrate.
The rate of consumption of different nutrient vary in every substrate, and so that their productivity. Some commonly used substrates in SSF are rice straw, vegetable waste, wheat bran, fruit bagasse, synthetic media, and paper pulp. Liquid media, molasses, waste water, vegetable juices, and soluble sugar are common substrates used in SmF to extract bioactive compounds.
Enzymes [10], antioxidants [11], antibiotics [12], biosurfactants [13], and pigments [14] are variety of bioactive compounds which are extracted using fermentation.
1.3 Enzymes
Enzyme cultivation is the most important technique for the manufacturing of different enzymes.
When fermentation on appropriate substrates is done, both fungus and bacterial microbes are required for the precious collection of enzyme. Enzyme production can be together performed by submerged and SSF. Bacterial enzyme production commonly implies SmF method because it requires high water potential [15]. In fungus, where less water potential is required, SSF method is applied [16].
In the world, 75% of the industries are using SmF for the production of enzymes. The major reason of using SSF is that it does not support genetically modified organisms (gmo) to the extent to which SmF does, so we prefer SmF rather than SSF.
One more reason of using SmF is that it has lack of paraphernalia as related to the cultivation of variety of enzymes using SSF. The microorganism is dissimilar in SmF and SSF by the detailed metabolism display that’s way this is highly critical process. Here, influx of nutrients and efflux of waste substance is carried out in different metabolic parameters of cultivation. Some small variation from the particular parameters will affect the undesirable product.
1.3.1 Bacterial Enzymes
Cellulose, amylase, xylanase, and L-asparaginase are some well know enzymes produced from bacteria. Previously we have thought that SmF is one of the best ways to produce enzyme from bacteria. Current studies have shown that for bacterial enzyme production SSF is more capable than SmF. The most important explanation can be given by metabolic differences. In SmF system, lowering of enzyme activity and production efficiency is done by gathering of different intermediate metabolites.
1.3.2 Fungal Enzymes
Numerous genus of fungus, Aspergillus, has been isolated from this process which is industrially important for the production of enzyme. This fungus has been a well-known model of microorganism for the production of fungus enzyme [17]. Aspergillus is one of the largest sources of fungal enzyme. The common difference between SSF and SmF are straight lying on the productivity of the fungus [17]. Using SmF, phytase is extracted from Thermoascusauranticus [18].
1.4 Antibiotics
The most important extract from microorganism using fermentation technology is antibiotics. It is a bioactive compound. Penicillin from Penicillium notatum is the first antibiotic produced from fermentation. It was completed in 1940s using SSF and SmF but today P. chrysogenum isolates are higher yielding producers [19]. Aminocillins, Carbapencins, Monobactams, Cephalosporins and Penicillins together they are known as β-lactam antibiotics [19]. Some other antibiotics like Tetracyclin, Streptomycin, Cyclosporin, Cephalosporin and Surfactin are manufactured from this process. Streptomyces clavuligerus, Nocardialactamdurans, and Streptomyces cattleya produces Cephamycin C from sunflower cake and cotton-de-oiled cake in which wheat raw is supplemented in SSF system as substrates for manufacturing Cephamycin C. In SSF, penicillin was produced by actinomycetes and fungi in mixed cultures.
In current time, the growth of proper substrates has led to the widespread use of SSF more than SmF. On the other hand, some results show that several microbial stains are extra suitable to SSF and others are more suitable for SmF. Thus, this technology is determined on the bases of microorganism that is being used for production. Recently, it has been studied that several antibiotics produced through SSF are more constant and high in quantity than SmF.
This is associated to minor production of bioactive substance that are intermediary compounds in SSF. However, the characteristics of the substrate material and their quality make SSF implementation limited. Due to this property, it is compulsory to check the production ability of different substrates earlier than optimization of the fermentation process.
Typically, in the beginning of batch cultivation, the bioreactors are filled with sterilized medium and the quantity of viable cell is known which is inoculated in the bioreactor. It is beneficial for the construction of biomass (Baker’s yeasts) and primary metabolites (lactic acid, citric acid, acetic acid or ethanol production).
In food industries, organic acids used as preservatives or acidifiers(lactic acids, citric acids, and acetic acids), alcoholic beverages (wine, beer, and distilled spirits i.e. brandy, whisky, and rum) and sweeteners (e.g., aspartate) or amino acids used as flavoring agents (e.g., monosodium glutamate)are the various product manufactured by submerged batch cultivation.
Fermentation of whisky is taken as a good example, the manufacturing of distilled spirits are made from wood or stainless steel and it is made in simple cylindrical vessels known as wash backs.
Even it is very difficult to clean it but they used it, mainly in malt whisky distilleries. In this process, wort is pumped and cooled to 20 °C and inoculated with the yeast cells.
It has been found that manufacturingof citric acid has reached 1.8 × 106 tons in 2010 and about 90% of this is synthesized by the fungus Aspergillus niger from sugar containing material like sugarcane, corn, and sugar beet and food industry consumed 60% of it. We can follow surface liquid fermentation, SSF, and submerged liquid fermentation for the production of citric acid in industrial scale, however, the end predominates [24].
1.5 Fed-Batch Cultivation
In fed batch cultivation, one or more nutrients are added aseptically, it is a semi-open system and the culture is supplemented step-by-step into the bioreactor at the same time the volume of the liquid culture in the bioreactor increase within this time.
The increase in productivity, enhanced yield by controlled sequential addition of nutrients, ability to achieve higher cell densities, and prolonged product synthesis are the main advantages of fed-batch over batch cultures.
Immobilized Cell Technology Active Biocatalyst also known as enzyme or microbial cell has increased the productivity of bioprocesses and it is managed through controlled contact with high concentration. Through cell immobilization or recycling by feeding strategies in high density cultures [20]. Cell immobilization mostly studied in the food and gas-liquid mass. It is done in three phase bioreactor; it requires all three phases in competent mass transfer. These bioreactor aims in the region where main process amplification can be managed through the improvement of gas-liquid mass transfer [21].
Fundamental difference between SmF and SSF
Submerged fermentation
Solid-state (substrate) fermentation
Water cultivation medium (~95%).
Water cultivation medium is low (40–80%).
Liquid–gas are the two phase of the system.
Solid–liquid–gas are three phase of system.
Homogeneous.
Heterogeneous.
Low nutrient content, water soluble.
High nutrient content, water insoluble.
Oxygen transfer: gas–liquid.
Oxygen transfer: liquid–solid and gas–liquid.
Microorganism growth: liquid medium.
Microorganism growth: medium surface.
Only oxygen is transfer, process is not limited.
Oxygen, heat, and nutrient transfer is limited.
Product: soluble in the liquid phase.
Product: high concentration.
1.6 Application of SSF
1.6.1 Enzyme Production
In SSF, agriculture industrial substrates are considered the most excellent for enzyme production.
The expenditure of enzyme production by SmF is high as compared to SSF.
Approximately, all well-known microbial enzymes are produced through this process. According to research study, large amount of work has been done on the enzyme production of industrial importance like cellulases, lipase, proteases, glucoamylases, amylases, ligninases, xylanases, pectinases, and peroxidases. Thermostable enzyme xylanase by thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis has been produced from this process. Enzymes produced from this process are more thermo-stable than SmF process. It has 22- folds higher in SSF system than in SmF system.
The bacterial strain extracted from open xylan agar plate are characterized as xylanase produced from Bacillus pumilus from both the processes (submerged and SSF fermentation) [22]. Rhizopus oligosporus is used to produce acid protease from rice bran and during its production no toxin effect occurred in SSF.
1.6.2 Organic Acids
Gallic acid, citric acid, fumaric acid, kojic acid, and lactic acid are various acid produced by SSF. Wheat bran, de-oiled rice bran, sugarcane, carob pods, coffee husk, kiwi fruit peels, pineapple wastes, grape pomace, and apple are some agro-industrial wastes which are very resourceful substrates for production of citric acid in SSF. For the production of citric acid from Aspergillus, pine apple waste was used as substrate [23]. Sugarcane bagasse impregnated with glucose and CaCO3 for the production of lactic acid from Rhizopus oryzaeis used.
1.6.3 Secondary Metabolites
Fungus produce secondary metabolite, gibberellic acid, in its stationary phase. Gibberellic acid production increases in SSF system. Gathering of gibberellic acid was 1.626 times greater in SSF than SmF using Gibberellafujikuroi in the production of gibberellic acid in which wheat bran is used as substrate.
1.6.4 Antibiotic
Cephamycin C, Cyclosporin A, Penicillin, Neomycin, Iturin, and Cephalosporins are some common antibiotics produced from SSF. Penicillin is produced from Penicillum chrysogenum in which wheat bran and sugarcane bagasse are used as substrate under high moisture content (70%). Nocardia lactamdurans, Streptomycesclavuligerus, and Streptomyces cattleya produces Cephamycin C. In SSF, antibiotic penicillin is produced from Actinomycetes and fungi through mixed cultures.
1.6.5 Biofuel
Today, ethanol is the most extensively used biofuel. Even though it is very easier to produce ethanol using SmF, it is preferred because of low water requirement, little volumes of fermentation mash, end product protection is inhibited and less liquid water disposal, it decreases pollution problem and it is most commonly used for ethanol production because of abundant availability. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is used for ethanol production in SSF of apple pomace supplemented with ammonium sulfate in controlled fermentation. Sweet potato, rice starch, wheat flour, potato starch, and sweet sorghum are commonly used substrate.
1.6.6 Biocontrol Agents
On the bases of different mode of action, fungal agent has greater potential to act as biocontrol agents. To control mosquitoes Liagenidium giganteum is used as fungal agent. It works by encysting on their larvae. Here they use larvae as a substrate for growth.
1.6.7 Vitamin
Nicotinic acid, vitamin B12, thiamine, riboflavin, and vitamins B6 are the water soluble enzyme produced on SSF with the help of different species of Rhizophus and Klebsiella, which is well-known producer of vitamin B12.
1.7 Future Perspectives
In food industries, processing microbial enzymes are extensively used as gift to fermentation technology. Yet, it is essential to make this kind of enzyme for the future development. In recent years, various new industrial and analytical applications have been drawn out for the manufacture of new products.
Fermentation technology needs evolution and enhancement for the food and beverage industries. It aim is to humanizing higher yield and production amount by means of construction, new models, bacterial strain, and process monitoring. In these areas, they have developed some modern ideas that could show the mode of cost-effectively attractive solutions.
In SSF, the area of modern instrumentation and sensor development is commendation of process monitoring is very important.
The modern technology characterized so far include different sensor of technologies like infrared spectrometry, magnetic resonance imaging, x-rays, image analysis, and respirometry. The chief drawback is high cost, so for large-scale applications this technique is unsuitable. Algae and micro/macro algae derived food production is one of the best bioreactor design for development of large-scale photo-bioreactors and phytocultures (seaweed). The use of properly controlled ultra-sonication in bioprocesses is another potential approach to enhance the metabolic productivity.
Sono-bioreactor performance (mass transfer enhancement), their function (e.g., cross-membrane ion fluxes, stimulated sterol synthesis, altered cell morphology, and increased enzyme activity) and biocatalysts (cells and enzymes) are advantageous effects of ultrasound which can be exploited.
Its prospective in the field of food fermentation for genetic engineering is indisputable. On the basis of understanding of their diet and human gastrointestinal microbiota, food fermentation has improved the nutritional status by the balanced choice of food-fermenting microbes. In this respect, food fermentation has attributed beneficial towards health and regarded as an extension of the food digestion.
References
1. Singh, V., Haque, S., Niwas, R., Srivastava, A., Pasupuleti, M., Tripathi, C.K.M., Strategies for fermentation medium optimization: an in-depth review. Front. Microbiol., 7, 2087, 2017.
2. Motarjemi, Y., Impact of small scale fermentation technology on food safety in developing countries. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 75(3), 213–29, 2002.
3. Subramaniyam, R., Vimala, R., Solid state and submerged fermentation for the production of bioactive substances: a comparative study. Int. J. Secur. Net., 3, 480, 2012.
4. Machado, C.M., Oishi, B.O, Pandey, A., Socco, C.R., Kinetics of Gibberellafujikorigrowth and Gibberellic acid production by solid state fermentation in a packed-bed column bioreactor. Biotechnol. Prog., 20, 1449, 2004.
5. Martins, S., Mussatto, S.I., Martinez-Avila, G., Montanez-Saenz, J., Aguilar, C.N., Teixeira, J.A., Bioactive phenolic compounds: production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. a review. Biotechnol. Adv., 29, 373, 2011.
6. Nigam, P.S., Pandey, A., Solid-state fermentation technology for bioconversion of biomass and agricultural residues. Biotechnol. Agro-Ind. Res. Util., 197, 221, 2009.
7. Harborne, J.B., Baxter, H., Moss, G.P., Phytochemical dictionary: handbook of bioactive compounds from plants, 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 1999.
8. Inui, M., Vertes, A. A., Yukawa, H., Advanced fermentation technologies, in: Biomass to biofuels, A.A. Vertes, N. Qureshi, H.P. Blashek, H. Yukawa (Eds.), 311–330. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd., 2010.
9. Babu, K.R., Satyanarayana, T., Production of bacterial enzymes by solid state fermentation. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 55, 464–467, 1996.
10. Kokila, R., Mrudula, S., Optimization of culture conditions for amylase production by thermohilic Bacillus sp. in submerged fermentation. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci., 12, 653, 2010.
11. Tafulo, P.K.R., Queiros, R.B., Delerue-Matos, C.M., Ferreira, M.G., Control and comparison of the antioxidant capacity of beers. Food Res. J., 43, 1702, 2010.
12. Maragkoudakis, P.A., Mountzouris, K.C., Psyrras, D., Cremonese, S., Fischer, J., Cantor, M.D., Tsakalidou, E., Functional properties of novel protective lactic acidbacteria and application in raw chicken meat against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 130, 219, 2009.
13. Pritchard, S.R., Phillips, M., Kailasapathy, K., Identification of bioactive peptides in commercial cheddar cheese. Food Res. J., 43, 1545, 2010.
14. Dharmaraj, S. Askokkumar, B., Dhevendran, K., Food-grade pigments from Streptomyces sp.isolated from the marine sponge Callyspongiadiffusa. Food Res. Int., 42, 487–492, 2009.
15. Chahal, D.S., Foundations of biochemical engineering kinetics and thermodynamics in biological systems, in: H.W. Blanch, E.T. Papontsakis, G. Stephanopoulas (Eds.), ACS symposium series, Washington:American Chemical Society, 1983.
16. Troller, J.A., Christian, J.H.B., Water activity and food. London: Academic Press, 1978.
17. Holker, U., Hofer, M., Lenz, J., Biotechnological advantages of laboratory-scale solidstate fermentation with fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 64, 175–186, 2004.
18. Nampoothiri, K.M., Tomes, G.J., Roopesh, K., Szakacs, G., Nagy, V., Soccol, C.R., Pandey, A., Thermostable phytase production by Thermoascusaurantiacus in submerged fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 118(1–3), 205–214, 2004.
19. Balakrishnan, K., Pandey, A., Production of biologically active secondary metabolites in solid state fermentation. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 55, 365, 1996.
20. Bumbak, F., Cook, S., Zachleder, V., Hauser, S., Kovar, K., Best practices in heterotrophic high-cell-density microalgal processes: achievements, potential and possible limitations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 91, 31–46, 2011.
21. Suresh, S., Srivastava, V.C., Mishra, I.M., Critical analysis of engineering aspects of shaken flask bioreactors. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 29, 255–278, 2009.
22. Kapilan, R., Arasaratnam, V., Paddy husk as support for solid state fermentation to produce xylanase from Bacillus pumilus. Rice Sci., 18 (1), 36–45, 2011.
23. Oliveira, F.C., Freire, D.M.G., Castilho, L.R., Production of poly(3-hydroxy-butyrate) by solid-state fermentation with Ralstoniaeutropha. Biotechnol. Lett., 26, 24, 2004.
24. Soccol, C.R., Vandenberghe, L.P.S., Rodrigues, C., Pandey, A., New perspectives for citric acid production and application. Food Technol. Biotechnol., 44, 141–149, 2006.
Chapter 2Modeling and Kinetics of Fermentation Technology
Biva Ghosh1, Debalina Bhattacharya2 and Mainak Mukhopadhyay1*
1Department of Biotechnology, JIS University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Abstract
Fermentation is a biochemical process of microorganism for the production of different valuable products such as enzymes, hormones, biofuels, etc. Fermentation process generally includes batch fermentation, feb-batch fermentation, and continuous culture. For enzyme production submerged and solid state fermentation process is involved. Microorganisms utilize the nutrients present in the substrates for their growth and product synthesis. Change in chemical or physical environment highly effects the product formation and its quality and yield. These changes effect the growth and product synthesis kinetics leading to different quality and yield of products. Thus, to ensure that the product formation is high quality and high yield, fermentation process has to be monitored properly. Mathematical calculation and statistical analysis is needed to track the fermentation process and monitor this process for best results. This enhances the product quality as well as leads to high yield. Many researchers has also developed strategies for the production of zero waste or to reuse the waste produced from one system to produce value added products of other system and leads to no waste technology. But all these strategies depend on the mathematical calculation, observation and statistical analysis, kinetics of product formation and monitoring. Different microorganisms have different growth kinetics and needs different modeling for high yield. It also enhances the economic value of product and economic status of the country. Thus this chapter focuses on the modeling and kinetics involved in high yield and high quality product formation from fermentation system.
Keywords: Modeling, kinetics, statistical analysis, mathematical calculations
2.1 Introduction
Fermentation is a biochemical process of microorganism for the production of variable products. Different organisms need different conditions to produce some specific products. Some of the variables such as biomass resource, type of microorganism, growth rate, agitation speed, substrate composition, reaction time and pH of the culture medium, simultaneous sacharification, and fermentation (SSF) are factors needed to be optimized for efficient production of product. Thus, optimization with modeling and kinetics solves the problem [1]. Kinetics is the analysis of the interpretation of observations and factors influencing the fermentation process. Such analysis can be explained by mainly three approaches: phenomenological, thermodynamic, and kinetic [2]. Though modeling and kinetics are differentially explained by different authors but the main interpretation remains same. Modeling and kinetics of the system is best interpreted by mathematical representations. Mathematical modeling is the representation of the essential aspects of reality with the help of function, symbols, and numbers. Manipulations and conversion of mathematical expression according to the need of the system help to create an optimized model of fermentation system for a particular product formation. It helps to estimate the convenience and cost of product formation in reality before performing the experiment in reality [1]. Modeling the kinetics of fermentation process helps to process-control and research efforts and thus, is considered as one of the most important aspect in fermentation process study. It effectively reduces the cost of production and increases quantity and quality of product formation. Modeling of the fermentation process not only includes kinetics of the cell system but also includes the condition of the bioreactor’s performance [3]. Thus, modeling has two parts microbial kinetics and bioreactor’s performance [3]. Now, as fermentation process involves many factors such as temperature, aeration, substrate, biomass, etc. on which products formation depends. Absence of perfects sensors for quantification of product formation and substrate and biomass leads to low productivity and manually optimizing the system is a tedious job. Thus, to increase the productivity, other factors affecting fermentation process needs to be controlled which leads to need of more man power and increase the cost of production [4]. Thus, to minimize the cost, the fermentation systems need to be automated. Thus, modeling and kinetics of the fermentation process using computerization is also an interesting topic discussed in this chapter. Fundamental aspects and need of modeling are explained in this chapter. This chapter helps to better understand the generalized notion of the application of modeling and use of kinetics for increasing productivity of fermentation process in recent days.
2.2 Modeling
Models consist of relationship between the system and the variables that affects the system. A system can be any equipment of unit operation such as bioreactors, a single cell, a microbial culture, an immobilized cell, HPLC etc. A system is affected by different variable of interest such as time, temperature, rate of reaction etc. Changing the variables, effects, the system or the surrounding environment. Thus, modeling of a system optimizes the conditions for better performance of the system. In case of fermentation there are many variables such as feed rate, pH, the rate and mode of agitation, inoculum quality, temperature, costs of production system, etc. which affects the system and surrounding environment [5]. Modeling can be done by using mathematical expression or non-mathematical by experimental methods. Mathematical modeling is best as it estimates the outcome of the system without actually performing the experiment. Whereas, in case of non-mathematical experimental methods is tedious as it takes long time and recurring of experimental methods and are also non-predictable [6]. Mathematical modeling is cost effective as it predicts the outcome before-hand thus, decrease the cost of system’s modeling. Modeling of a system is a cyclic process which involves many aspects which needs to monitored. Some of the aspects are biological, physicochemical, technological constrains, literature study, database together forms data from which assumptions are derived. Further combination of experiment with these assumptions leads to model formation. More analysis is done to improve the model and produce an optimized model for the specific system [5].
As modeling is cyclic process consisting many steps of optimization thus, to start a model formation we can consider any simple components such as set of results from a batch culture (Figure 2.1). Changing the components of culture media and observing the rate of cell growth and extracellular component production with respect to times is also a small example of modeling the culture system [6]. Changing the parameter which is involved in the system leads to modeling the system. Mathematical modeling is the best method of modeling as discussed earlier in this chapter. Now, this mathematical expression when combined with the power of automatization form dynamic model of system. In this 21st century automatization is achieved with the help of computer system. Nowadays, many software has developed which can easily analyze data and interpret it. Many more sophisticated sensors have developed which can precisely sense the production of required components in the system. Modeling of fermentation system using computers has enhanced the productivity [4, 6].
Figure 2.1 A flowchart describing the cyclic nature of modeling process.
2.2.1 Importance of Modeling
Fermentation is biochemical process which involves conversion of different compound into industrially valuable compounds. Fermentation system is an innovative piece of instrument which makes the fermentation process simpler and easier to produce complex compounds in a simple process. Fermentation process is affected by many parameters such as composition of media, pH, temperature, aeration, feed rate, mode of agitation, inoculation quantity etc. Change in these parameters affects the fermentation process. Thus, optimization and monitoring of the system increases the production rate [6].
With the advancement of technology, such as improved measurement, instrumentation, information technology, molecular biology and high-throughput techniques enormous data of quantitative and qualitative in fermentation processing, and biotechnology engineering is produced. These data are analyzed, looked for relations and connectivity among them using various software. Once the relation and connectivity is found a model is developed [4]. As modeling is a cyclic process, construction of hypothesis as a first step towards construction of model is the best method. Modeling thus, provides predictive information regarding the action of fermentation system. It prior to perform an experiment predicts the outcomes or results. In this ways we can choose a perfect model or construct a new model with the existing model according to our needs regarding the product formation. It also reduces the labor or manpower cost and automation of the system provides error less analysis leading to minimum loss [7]. In this way, a cost effect but high yielding fermentation system is generated. By using model based terminologies, it also acts as a communicating language among scientist and engineers of different backgrounds. It acts as a universal language for communication regarding a fermentation system. It helps to predict and decide the next experiment precisely without hassle of repeating experiments. Model automatically measure and monitors factors and sometimes highlights factors which are consider as less importance but are actually highly important to the fermentation system. These applications of model signifies the importance of modeling a system [8].
For constructing a model, the components of modeling need to be understood. The knowledge of the parameters of modeling helps to predict the system. Constructing a model is precise when it is tested by its ability to predict the outcome of the system reaction by a set of independent experiments which consist of different forms of experiment including parameters involved in the fermentation system [9]. In constructing a model, experimental error and physical constrain should also be taken care of. Experimental errors may include omitting data with high degree of error. Thus, the model should consist of replicate of experiments, sampling and analysis. Physical constrains includes technical, biological, chemical and physical, upper and lower limits of the range of values of the system variables and parameters which needs to be taken care of [5].
2.2.2 Components of Modeling
Components of modeling include control volume, variables, parameters, and the equations (Figure 2.2). Other than this, assumption and hypothesis are also indispensable part of the fermentation modeling system [10].
Figure 2.2 The components of modeling.
2.2.2.1 Control Volume
Control region or volume is one of the most important components of modeling. Control regions is the space in the system where all the variable (concentration, pH, temperature, pressure etc.) chosen for the system are kept uniform. It is need not to be necessary that the concentration in the control region to be constant with time. Rather, concentration may vary or may remain constant with time but, any change occurring in the control region remains uniforms with time [5]. This means that the concentration of the compounds for example in the system remains uniform with time in the control region. As in most real system is heterogeneous thus, control region is mostly considered as an imaginary space of the system by the modelers. In case of a heterogeneous system more than one control region is considered depending on the bulk of homogeneity. Control region can be best with an example such as in bioreactor where the concentration of a compound in uniform in the whole system than the bulk liquid is the control region and has single control region. But if in a bioreactor, the concentration of compounds is divided by the impeller in two or more than two halves, but the concentration of compounds in each region remains uniform than the system consist of more than two control region. The bulk liquid is the control region (Figure 2.3). There may be exchange of matter, energy or momentum with the control regions. The volume of the control region may vary or remain constant. The control regions can be finite or infinitesimal. Control regions has some boundaries that can be defined as: phase boundaries across which no exchange occurs, phase boundaries across which an exchange of mass and energy takes place and geometrically defined boundaries in a single phase within which the exchange takes place by bulk flow or molecular diffusion [5]. Choosing of control volume is a crucial step in modeling process for the success of the model. Though the process seems to be easy, but many factors and variable are needs to be considered which make the process complicated. Thus, it can be interpreted that to construct a model first the system to be designed should be assumed and then the consideration of what should be the mode of operation or activity which further help to decide whether the system will be steady or unsteady that is whether the system properties should change or not. This heterogeneity of the system further decides whether the control region will be finite or infinitesimal.
Figure 2.3 The schematic diagram explaining the control region in two types of bioreactor system.
2.2.2.2 Variables
Variables are the component of the system whose change in the system affects the system. Variable are of three types: state, operating, and intermediate variables [7].
State variables – It defines the state of the process and for every extensive property of the system one variable is present. For example, viable cell concentration (
X
v
), non-viable cell concentration (
X
d
) etc. [5].
Operating variables – These are the variable whose values can be set by the operator of the process. For example, dilution rate (
D
), volumetric feed flow rate (
F
) etc. [5].
Intermediate variables – It is defined as volumetric rate variables which can also be defined under state variable [5].
2.2.2.3 Parameters
Parameter are a set of constrains or measurable factors which limits or boundaries the scope of a particular process [2].
Kinetic parameter – The kinetic rate expression constants for the system is defined as kinetic parameters. Such as µ
max
is maximum specific growth rate per hour,
K
S
is the saturation constant kg per m
3
etc. [2, 11]
Stoichiometric parameters – These are the stoichiometric relationship in biological system or reaction. Such as
Y
P/S
is the yield coefficient of product with respect to substrate [12].
2.2.2.4 Mathematical Model
Mathematical model consists of a set of equations for each control model which can predict the system outcome. A novel mathematical model is derived from the combination of previously established mathematical expressions [1]. The mathematical model consists of balance equations for each extensive property of the system, thermodynamic equations, rate equations. Rate equations can be divided into rate of reaction which defines the rate of generation or consumption of an individual species within the control region and rate of transfer of mass, energy, momentum across the boundaries of the control region [13].
2.2.2.4.1 Mass Balance Equation
Balance equations are needed for every extensive property of interest in every control region. Extensive properties are those that are additive over the whole system such as mass and energy whereas concentration and temperature are intrusive properties of the system [14]. Other than this each and every balance equation are linearly independent that means no balance equation is formed by the addition or combination other equations [5]. Such as:
(Eq. 2.1)
Input and output can be defined by the rate of mass transfer and reaction phenomenon as:
Generation (input) and consumption (output) due to reaction within the control region.
Transfer occurs across the phase boundaries
Bulk flow across the boundaries of control region
Diffusion across the boundaries of control region
Extensive properties of the control region can accumulate or deplete which can be measured by numeric value or magnitude of input and output of the control region [15]. Here input is considered as positive and output as negative term. Accumulations and depletions are the rate of extensive properties change in the control region with respect to time [16]. If the total of input term is larger than those of the output term, then the extensive properties are accumulating in the control region and if the total of output term is larger than the input then the depletion of extensive properties occurs the control region (Eq. 2.1) [5].
2.2.2.5 Automatization
From 18th century with the invention of computers, steady increase in the use of computers in different sectors has occurred. Automatization using computers has crept into every sectors of industries replacing the power of manpower. It has also lead to more error free and precise process. Automatization has already well prospered in industries such as oil industries, metallurgy, chemical industries etc. whereas it took long time to prosper in fermentation industries [8]. The reason behind this are: lack of proper sensor for product, substrate and biomass; absence of reliable process model for process control analysis; investment for computers in case of fermentation field were costlier with respect to other industries as fermentation were small scale production earlier. But now fermentation industries are growing rapidly and are large scale industry as well as now better sensors and fermentation models are present to facilitate the fermentation process (Figure 2.4) [8].
Figure 2.4 The type of sensors.
2.2.2.5.1 Some Fundamental Component of Computer-Control Fermentation
Fermentor – Fermentor is vessel with controlled condition of aeration, agitation, temperature, pH in which microbes are grown for fermentation process. It consists of an input and output port. A sensor could be attached with the output port for controlling the input of the substrates with respective to the output of the product. In this way other factor of a fermentor which is controlled manually could be automatized and the whole process could be tracked and sensed in the computer system [4].
Computer – Computers are the digital machines which could performs the task given to them automatically by performing a set of operation in accordance with predetermined set of variables and programs assigned to them. In case of fermentation system, a computer should consist of programs and software which could analyze the generated data and reproduce it as an understandable format (
Table 2.1
). Thus, a powerful computer with more storage capacity and high speed of performance could be best suited for automatization of fermentation system [4].
Table 2.1 Some fermentation control software in recent days.
Sl.no.
Software
Description
Reference
1
Matlab
analyzing data, developing algorithms, or creating models
2
Minifor
includes all the electronics for visualizing and regulation of 6 parameters (temperature, pH, DO, air flow rate, agitation and parameter ‘X’)
4
Process control software (PCS)
for completely automatic control, data acquisition and real-time visualization of parameters
5
FNet
ready to use software for MINIFOR fermentor and bioreactor
6
SIAM
industrial fermentation sotware with unlimited possibilities (e.g.: redox potential, CARBOMETER and other instruments
7
MINI-4-GAS sotware
an extension of SIAM for automatic gas-mixing
2.2.2.5.2 Interphase Between Computer and Fermentor
A computer system is accompanied with input and output port which is used to transfer data and control signals to and fro between computer and fermentor. There are mainly two types of ports that are parallel port and serial port. A parallel port transfer bits of data simultaneously whereas serial port transfers bits of data one at a time. Serial port is used to communicate between process operator console and process computer. Serial port is useful in managing data traffic that exists between the computer and terminal [23]. As in case of serial port single link is enough to transfer
