132,99 €
Targeted Therapy in Translational Cancer Research for the Translational Oncology series provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments in our understanding of tumor biology, elucidates the roles of targets and pathways involved in carcinogenesis, and describes current state-of-the-art anticancer therapy, as well as the most promising areas of translational research and targeted therapy. * Introduces cutting-edge 'bench to bedside and back' breakthroughs which have transformed the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer * Covers basic principles of targeted therapy, including immunotherapy and the roles of cancer stem cells, the microenvironment, angiogenesis, epigenetics, microRNAs, and functional imaging in precision medicine * Summarises major advances in therapeutic management of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors using conventional therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or novel treatment modalities
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1597
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015
SERIES EDITORS
ROBERT C. BAST, MD
Vice President for Translational Research The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA
MAURIE MARKMAN, MD
Senior Vice President for Clinical Affairs Cancer Treatment Centers of AmericaClinical Professor of Medicine Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, PA, USA
ERNEST HAWK, MD, MPH
Vice President, Division of OVP, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA
EDITED BY
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou, MD, PhD
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA
Razelle Kurzrock, MD
Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center La Jolla, CA, USA
Kenneth C. Anderson, MD, PhD
LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Myeloma Center Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission.
The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting a specific method, diagnosis, or treatment by health science practitioners for any particular patient. The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. Readers should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization or Website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or Website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet Websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. No warranty may be created or extended by any promotional statements for this work. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any damages arising herefrom.
For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at (317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic formats. For more information about Wiley products, visit our web site at www.wiley.com.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:
Targeted therapy in translational cancer research / edited by Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou, Razelle Kurzrock, Kenneth C. Anderson. p. ; cm. – (Translational oncology) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-118-46857-9 (cloth) I. Tsimberidou, Apostolia-Maria, editor. II. Kurzrock, Razelle, editor. III. Anderson, Kenneth C., editor. IV. Series: Translational oncology (Series) [DNLM: 1. Molecular Targeted Therapy. 2. Neoplasms–drug therapy. 3. Immunotherapy. 4. Individualized Medicine. 5. Translational Medical Research. QZ 267] RC271.I45 616.99′4061–dc23
2015015320
List of Contributors
Series Foreword
Foreword
Preface: Bench to Bedside and Back
PART I: Principles of Targeted Therapies
CHAPTER 1: Toward Personalized Therapy for Cancer
Introduction
Personalized Targeted Therapy
Prognostic Stratification and Prediction of Chemotherapy Benefit in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
HER2-Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer
BRAF Inhibitors in BRAF Mutant Melanoma
Strategies for Comprehensive Molecular Characterization
A Personalized Approach to Investigational Therapy Selection
Challenges to Personalized Cancer Therapy
Summary
References
CHAPTER 2: Combining Targeted Therapies
Rationale for Drug Combination of Targeted Agents
Principles and Strategies for Combining Agents Targeting Signaling Pathways
Combining Targeted and Immune Therapies
Preliminary Data: Building the Hypothesis and Rationale for the Trial
First Step, Regulatory Issues to Consider Before a Hands-On Approach
Clinical Scenarios and Clinical Trial Design
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 3: Principles of Targeted Immunotherapy
Introduction
Principles of Immunotherapy
Conclusion
References
CHAPTER 4: Cancer Stem Cell Principles
Background
Historical Perspective
Cancer Stem Cells in Hematologic Malignancies
Cancer Stem Cells in Solid Tumors
Controversy and Clinical Relevance
Targeting Cancer Stem Cells
Conclusions
Note
References
CHAPTER 5: The Tumor Microenvironment as a Target for Therapeutic Intervention
Introduction
Components of the TME
Complex Communication Between Tumor Cells and Their Microenvironment
Lessons Learned and Conclusions
Final Remarks
Acknowledgment
References
CHAPTER 6: The Role of Angiogenesis in Cancer
How Vessels Are Formed
Angiogenesis Pathways
Therapies Targeting the VEGF Pathway
Toxicities
Resistance to Antiangiogenic Therapy
Biomarkers
Concluding Remarks
References
CHAPTER 7: Epigenetics and Epigenetic Therapy of Cancer
Structure of the Genetic Code
DNA Methylation
DNA Demethylation
TET Proteins
Histone Modifications
Noncoding RNA
Polycomb Repressive Complex
IDH1/2
Epigenetic Perturbations in Hematologic Malignancies
Epigenetic Perturbations in Breast Cancer
Epigenetic Perturbations in Lung Cancer
Epigenetic Perturbations in Colon Cancer
Epigenetics in Diagnostics
Role of Epigenetics in Therapeutics
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
EZH2 Inhibitors
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 8: The Role of microRNAs in Cancer
Introduction
miRNAs Dysregulation in Cancer
miRNAs in Therapy
Conclusion
References
CHAPTER 9: Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Introduction
Monoclonal Antibodies
Targeting Drivers of Proliferation in AML
Targeting Apoptotic Pathways, Cell Cycle Regulation, and Cancer Cell Metabolism
Chimeric Antigen Receptors and Vaccines
Summary
References
CHAPTER 10: Targeted and Functional Imaging
Introduction
Functional Imaging of Tumor Physiology
Functional Imaging of Tumor Molecular Targets and Processes
Conclusion
Note
References
PART II: Targeted Therapy in Hematological Malignancies
CHAPTER 11: Targeted Therapies in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Introduction
CML Frontline Treatment Options
Other Strategies
Choice of Frontline Therapy
Management of TKI Resistance
Second Generation TKI
Third Generation TKI
Definition of Response and Failure to TKI Therapy and Choice of Therapy
Can TKIs Be Safely Discontinued?
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
References
CHAPTER 12: Targeted Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Introduction
Prognostication in ALL
Surface Antigen as a Therapeutic Target
BCR-ABL-Positive ALL
Ph-Like ALL
PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway Inhibitors and B-Cell Receptor Inhibitors
Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy
T-Cell ALL
Notch Inhibition in T-Cell ALL
Early T-Cell Precursor ALL
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 13: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Background
Biologic and Molecular Aspects of CLL
Targeted Therapeutic Agents in the Treatment of CLL
Clinical Results with BCR Signaling Kinase Inhibitors
Other Novel Therapeutic Agents in CLL
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 14: Multiple Myeloma
MM as a Neoplastic Factory of Immunoglobulins: Biologic and Clinical Implications
A Broader View: MM in the Context of the BM Niche
Distinct Molecular Targets of MM Cells
Conclusions and Future Perspective
References
CHAPTER 15: The Impact of Genomics on Targeted Therapy in Multiple Myeloma and Lymphomas
Genomics of Hematologic Neoplasms and Their Potential to Inform Rationale Therapies
Targeted Agents in Clinical Trials for Patients with MM and DLBCL
New Therapeutic Challenges Revealed by Genomics
References
CHAPTER 16: Targeted Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Biological Hallmarks of Myelodysplasia
Current Standard of Care in MDS
New Therapeutic Targets in MDS
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 17: Lymphoma and Targeted Therapies
Overview
Summary
References
PART III: Targeted Therapy in Solid Tumors
CHAPTER 18: Targeted Therapy in Solid Tumors: Brain
Introduction
Predictive and Prognostic Factors
Targets for Therapy
Future Perspectives
Concluding Remarks
References
CHAPTER 19: Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer
Targeting ER in Breast Cancer
Targeting HER2 in Breast Cancer
Novel Targeted Treatments in ER Positive Breast Cancer
BRCA-Associated Tumors and PARP Inhibitors
Genomic Profiling
References
CHAPTER 20: Targeted Therapy in Solid Tumors: Colorectal Cancer
Overview
Targeted Therapy, Receptors, and Signaling Networks
Conclusion
References
CHAPTER 21: Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial Cancer
PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR
EGFR and HER2
IGF-1R
FGFR2
E-cadherin
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 22: Targeted Therapy in Solid Tumors: Head and Neck
Introduction
Genetic Alterations in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Current Treatment for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Targeted Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor
Targeting the Proteasome
Targeting TP53a
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 23: Targeted Therapy in Solid Tumors: Lung Cancer
Angiogenesis
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
ALK
ROS1
RET
BRAF
HER2
KRAS
Other Mutations in Adenocarcinomas
Squamous Cell Lung Cancer
Comprehensive Genomic Studies
Future Perspectives
References
CHAPTER 24: Targeted Therapy in Melanoma
Introduction
The MAP Kinase Pathway
BRAF as a Therapeutic Target
Paradoxical MAP Kinase Pathway Activation
MEK Inhibitors in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma
NRAS
CKIT
Acquired Resistance to BRAF-Targeted Therapy
Mechanisms of
de novo
BRAF Inhibitor Resistance
Intersection Between Targeted Therapy and Immune Therapy
Summary
References
CHAPTER 25: Ovarian Cancer
Introduction
Ovarian Cancer Histology
Molecular Aberrations in Ovarian Cancer
Targeting Angiogenesis
Targeting DNA Repair with Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibition
Targeting the RAS/RAF Pathway
Targeting the PI3K/AKT Pathway
Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway
Targeting Folate
Targeting Other Pathways of Interest
Conclusion
References
CHAPTER 26: Molecular Therapeutics: Pancreatic Cancer
Introduction
Therapeutics Currently in Development
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 27: Targeted Therapies for Pediatric Solid Tumors
Introduction
Neuroblastoma
Gliomas
Osteosarcoma
Ewing's Sarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Wilms' Tumor
Hepatoblastoma
Ependymomas
Medulloblastoma
Retinoblastoma
Conclusions
References
CHAPTER 28: Prostate Cancer
Introduction
Molecular Pathogenesis of Prostate Cancer
Systemic Prostate Cancer Treatments Targeting Androgen Signaling
Non-androgen Signaling-Targeted Systemic Treatments
Bone-Targeted Systemic Treatments
Immunotherapy
Future Perspectives
References
CHAPTER 29: Renal Cell Carcinoma and Targeted Therapy
Introduction
Molecular Pathogenesis of RCC
Important Signaling Pathways in RCC
Targeted Therapies in RCC
Conclusion
References
CHAPTER 30: Targeted Therapy in Solid Tumors: Sarcomas
Introduction
KIT
Conclusion
References
PART IV: Targeted Therapy for Specific Molecular Aberrations
CHAPTER 31: RAS-RAF-MEK Pathway: Aberrations and Therapeutic Possibilities
Introduction
The RAS Family: HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS
The Congenital RAS-opathies: Germline Mutations of
RAS
The Acquired RAS-opathies: Melanoma and NRAS
The RAF Family: ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF
BRAF Inhibitors
Management of Metastatic Melanoma in the Era of BRAF Inhibitors
The CRAF Story
MEK Inhibitors—The MEK Family: MEK1 and MEK2
Future Directions: Big Results for Small Molecules
References
CHAPTER 32: The Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway in Human Malignancies
Introduction
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
PI3K Effectors: AKT/mTOR
PI3K/AKT/mTOR Mutations
PI3K/AKT/mTOR as a Therapeutic Target
From Rational Drug Design to Clinical Efficacy: Lessons and Challenges
References
CHAPTER 33: Current Status and Future Direction of PARP Inhibition in Cancer Therapy
Introduction
BRCA1, BRCA2
, and Breast and Ovarian Cancer
DNA Damage and Repair
Role of PARP in DNA Repair
Molecular Mechanism of HRR
Clinical Development of PARP Inhibitors
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Maintenance Therapy
Other PARPi in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Breast Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer
PARPi Therapy in Other Cancers
Other PARP Inhibitors in Development
Toxicity Profile of PARPi Monotherapy
PARPi as Combination Therapy
Predictive Biomarkers of Response to PARPi
Resistance to PARPi
Platinum Sensitivity Following PARPi Resistance
Conclusion and Future Directions
References
CHAPTER 34: Targeting the c-Met Kinase
Role of c-Met in Carcinogenesis and Tumor Progression
c-Met Expression in Various Tumor Types
Cross Talk Among Signaling Pathways
c-Met Pathways as Therapeutic Targets
HGF/c-Met-Targeted Therapies Now in Development
Mechanisms of Resistance
Future Perspectives
References
CHAPTER 35: KIT Kinase
KIT Biology
KIT in Cancer
KIT as a Therapeutic Target
KIT Future Strategies
References
CHAPTER 36: TP53
Introduction
p53 Pathway Abnormalities in Malignancies
Targeting p53 for Cancer Therapy
Concluding Remarks
Acknowledgments
References
PART V: Future Perspectives
CHAPTER 37: Future Perspectives
Introduction
Study of Tumor Biology
Molecular Testing for Clinical Use
Tumor Monitoring
Use of Bioinformatics
Innovative Clinical Trials
Optimal Access to Drugs
Drug Development Regulations
Economic Considerations
Value of Cancer Care
Centralized Big Data
References
Index
EULA
Chapter 1
Table 1.1
Chapter 2
Table 2.1
Table 2.2
Chapter 3
Table 3.1
Chapter 5
Table 5.1
Chapter 6
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Chapter 8
Table 8.1
Table 8.2
Chapter 9
Table 9.1
Chapter 11
Table 11.1
Table 11.2
Table 11.3
Chapter 13
Table 13.1
Table 13.2
Table 13.3
Chapter 14
Table 14.1
Table 14.2
Table 14.3
Chapter 15
Table 15.1
Chapter 16
Table 16.1
Chapter 18
Table 18.1
Chapter 20
Table 20.1
Table 20.2
Chapter 21
Table 21.1
Chapter 22
Table 22.1
Table 22.2
Chapter 23
Table 23.1
Chapter 24
Table 24.1
Chapter 25
Table 25.1
Table 25.2
Table 25.3
Chapter 26
Table 26.1
Chapter 27
Table 27.1
Chapter 28
Table 28.1
Chapter 29
Table 29.1
Table 29.2
Chapter 30
Table 30.1
Table 30.2
Chapter 32
Table 32.1
Chapter 33
Table 33.1
Chapter 1
Figure 1.1 The cancer care continuum for personalized medicine.
Figure 1.2 Biomarker-driven clinical trials. (a, b) Biomarker-selected single arm trials may deliver targeted therapy to patients selected for a specific genomic alteration or other biomarker or may randomize patients with a biomarker to investigational therapy or standard of care therapy. (c, d) Patients may be stratified based on the biomarker status, and patients with or without the biomarker may receive the investigational therapy or they may be randomized between standard of care therapy and the investigational arm. (e) In umbrella trials, multiple biomarkers may be simultaneously assessed, and patients allocated to treatment based on biomarker status. (f) In adaptive trials, initially patients can be randomly allocated between treatment arms, but subsequently the allocation is adaptive, based on disease control or other short-term endpoints in each biomarker subtype for each therapy. (g) In N-of-1 trials, patients are given a therapeutic regimen assessed to match their genomic/molecular profile most closely.
Chapter 2
Figure 2.1 Proposal of novel trial designs exploring combinations of targeted therapies. Combining two drugs depicts a 2D matrix of possible dose levels (a). In some cases, dose escalation can proceed without exploring all those potential dose levels; dose escalation can proceed in a diagonal orientation (b), by increasing the dose of each drug, one at a time like a staircase (c) or by starting at full doses of one drug and escalating the dose of the other (e). In case side effects are seen, dose escalation can diverge and several alternative cohorts can be opened (d), allowing exploration of multiple MTDs. In the case of combining 3 drugs, the matrix of dose levels is in 3D (f). In looking for synergy, one could begin with one drug, and after an assessment, the other one is added (g). When exploring the role of one drug for overcoming drug-resistance of the principal one, patients could be treated with the principal one and at disease progression, the second drug is added (h). Multiple combinations or schedules can be compared in a single study with or without an adaptive randomization methodology (i and j).
Chapter 3
Figure 3.1 Antibody-based immunotherapy. Various iterations of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed for the treatment of cancer. Unconjugated mAbs bind to their target and engage NK cells, macrophages, dendritic cells as well as soluble complement components via the Fc-component of the mAb. These resulting effector functions include ADCC (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity), CMC (complement-mediated cytotoxicity—not depicted), and ADCP (antibody-dependent phagocytosis—not depicted). Bispecific mAbs and BiTEs are engineered to bind to the TAA (tumor-associated antigen) and engage CD3 on CTLs (cytotoxic lymphocytes), thereby activating CTLs against tumor cells, independent of their TCR (T-cell receptor) specificity. TriomAbs additionally recruit NK cells and macrophages via their Fc-receptor. Immunoconjugates such as ADC (antibody-drug conjugates), RIT (radioimmunotherapies), immunotoxins, or ADEPT (antibody-dependent enzyme prodrug therapies) deliver cytotoxic agents directly to the target cell. Antagonistic mAbs to CTLA-4, PD1 or PD1-L block ligand–receptor interactions that otherwise deliver inhibitory signals to the T cell and allow targeted cellular cytotoxicity to ensue.
Figure 3.2 Chimeric antigen-receptor (CARs) T cells. T cells can be transduced to express chimeric antigen-receptors (CARs) that endow them with specificity to a particular TAA. Although many iterations have been developed, the CAR commonly consists of a sFcv (single-chain variable fragment) derived from an mAb against a TAA which is linked to an ITAM (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif) such as the CD3ζ-chain. Frequently, additional intracellular co-stimulatory domains are included (not depicted here). CAR+ T-cells can recognize TAAs independent of their MHC-presentation and become activated upon binding to the TAA.
Chapter 4
Figure 4.1 Cancer stem cell concept versus stochastic model of tumor growth. The cancer stem cell concept proposes that most cancers are broadly organized in a similar hierarchical structure to their tissue of origin: relatively rare populations of stem-like cells, termed cancer stem cells (depicted in red), give rise to more prevalent differentiated cells. It further hypothesizes that current treatment methods eliminate the differentiated cells, but leave behind the drug-resistant cancer stem cells that eventually regenerate the tumor and lead to relapse; accordingly, cure requires treatments that target the drug-resistant cancer stem cells. Conversely, the stochastic model suggests that some cancer cells will escape therapy as a result of chemotherapy response following first order kinetics, and any remaining cancer cell can regenerate the tumor. Under this model, it would not be necessary to specifically target a subset of cells, but rather better targeting of the total population is needed.
Chapter 5
Figure 5.1 Evolution of the concept of the tumor microenvironment in cancer biology: some milestone discoveries.
Chapter 8
Figure 8.1 miRNAs biology. (a) Phylogenetic tree indicating conserved genomic clustering of miR-100, let-7, and miR-125/lin-4 microRNAs. Note that the human genome contains three miR-100, let-7, and miR-125/lin-4 clusters on chromosomes 9, 11, and 21 respectively. (b) Alignments of the human let-7 family members. The seed region of let-7 is highlighted in red: it is identical for all the paralogs. (c) Genomic organization of miRNA genes in human. Intergenic and intronic monocistronic or multicistronic miRNA genes are represented; miRtrons are also shown. (d) miRNAs are transcribed in the nucleus mainly by the RNA polymerase II producing a primary-miRNA (pri-miRNA). The primary step of miRNA biogenesis and maturation is the nuclear cleavage of the pri-miRNA by a ribonuclease III enzyme called Drosha liberating a ∼60–70 nt stem–loop intermediate known as the miRNA precursor called pre-miRNA (cropping). After this cleavage the pre-miRNA is transported into the cytoplasm by Exportin 5 (Exp 5), a Ran-GTP-dependent nucleo/citoplasmic cargo transporter (export). Once exported into the cytoplasm, pre-miRNAs are processed into short double-strand miRNA duplex by Dicer (dicing). Mature miRNA of 19–25 nt in length is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) where they target specific mRNAs for translational repression or mRNA cleavage therefore regulating gene expression.
Chapter 10
Figure 10.1 Glucose metabolism and cell proliferation PET imaging. Whole-body FDG-PET and FLT-PET in 73-year-old man with mantle cell lymphoma for pre- and post-therapy evaluation. Coronal maximal intensity projection (MIP) images reveal multiple FDG and FLT avid lesions in lymph node chains. Pre-therapy FDG (a) and FLT (b) scans were performed within 24 hours of each other, as well as the post-therapy FDG (c) and FLT (d) scans. Note interval decrease in metabolism and cell proliferation in tumor sites following therapy.
Figure 10.2 Glucose metabolism and hypoxia PET imaging. Whole-body FDG-PET (a) and whole-body
18
F-HX4-PET (b) coronal images of 76-year-old man with laryngeal cancer status post combined chemoradiation therapy. Note mild FDG uptake in mid neck (arrow) due to post-treatment inflammation and lack of
18
F-HX4 uptake indicating lack of tumor hypoxia. Patient is currently alive for approximately 3 years since PET imaging.
Figure 10.3 Glucose metabolism and angiogenesis PET imaging. Whole-body FDG-PET (a) and whole-body
18
F-RGD-K5-PET (b) coronal MIP images of 60-year-old man with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor to liver. Note multiple FDG avid hepatic metastases and lack of
18
F-RGD-K5 uptake within metastatic lesions indicating lack of angiogenesis. The patient did not respond to anti-angiogenesis therapy and subsequently passed away several months after PET imaging due to tumor progression.
Chapter 12
Figure 12.1 Monoclonal antibodies in B-cell ALL.
Chapter 13
Figure 13.1 B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathways and therapeutic targets in CLL B cell (shown with a lightning bolt symbol). BCR signaling pathways and therapeutic targets: BCR signaling in CLL can occur in the presence of an external antigen (Ag) or by recognizing an internal epitope on light chain FR3 with HCDR3 region on heavy chain of the surface immunoglobulin (sIg). Autonomous stimulation activates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway directly while antigen-dependent signaling stimulates other signaling molecules as shown in the figure (see the main text for details). Chemokines, chemokine receptors, endothelial cells, and interactions of nurse-like cells (NLC) are shown. (a) Kinase inhibitors of BCR signaling. The lightning bolt symbol (pink) indicates major kinases LYN, SYK, BTK, p110PI3Kδ, and p110PI3K, and other isoforms (γ, α, β) as therapeutic targets across the BCR signaling pathway. Signaling cascade and specific inhibitors of each class are discussed in the main text. (b) Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (in yellow)—common surface epitopes used for developing therapeutic mAbs include CD20, CD52, CD37, and CD40. Other targets of potential relevance include inhibitors of mTOR/AKT pathway depicted in bolt (green), inhibitors of CXCR4 receptors depicted in bolt (white), inhibitors of RAS/MAP kinase pathway depicted in bolt (black), inhibitors of protein kinase C beta (PKCβ), and NFkB depicted in bolt (blue and brown, respectively).
Chapter 14
Figure 14.1 Pathogenesis of MM. MM is the cancer transformation of BM-resident long-lived PC and evolves from the premalignant conditions MGUS and smoldering MM. Initial oncogenic events are hypothesized to take place during the process of immunoglobulin isotype switch and somatic hypermutation in the GC. Genetic, epigenetic, and biologic events are outlined along with the neoplastic evolution. Diverse patterns of clonal evolution have been recently identified in MM and are outlined here and are overall characterized by a progressive increase in genomic complexity culminating at the leukemic stage of MM.
105
Abbreviations: GC: germinal center; PC: plasma cell; MGUS: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; SMM: smoldering MM; MM: multiple myeloma; F: founder clone; S: subclone. Modified with permission from Reference 106.
Figure 14.2 Molecular targets in MM involved in protein synthesis, folding and disposal. The cartoon synthesizes the molecular targets identified along the processes of protein synthesis, folding and disposal, in particular along the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and alternative proteolytic pathways. Green boxes outline FDA-approved while red boxes signify drugs currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Abbreviations: E1: ubiquitin-activating enzymes; E2: ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes; E3: ubiquitin ligase enzymes; Ub: ubiquitin; DUBs: deubiquitinating enzymes.
Figure 14.3 The large blue cell in the center is a MM cell with nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum and proteolytic pathways outlined. The close interplay with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) in light brown, osteoclasts (in red) and osteblasts (in green) is outlined. Immune cells relevant for immunologic escape of MM are also represented. Key signaling molecules and cytokines are represented in pale pink ovals while in pale pink squares are molecules targeted by currently approved therapies. Modified with permission from Reference 106.
Chapter 16
Figure 16.1 Treatment algorithm for the current standard of care in MDS. Low-risk MDS: Consider ESAs +/– G-CSF if EPO levels predict possibility of response (<500 mUI/mL). In patients with del(5q) treatment with lenalidomide should be initiated. If loss of response appears, consider treatment with hypomethylating agents or inclusion in clinical trial. High-risk MDS: Standard treatment should involve HMA treatment followed by alloSCT if candidate to transplantation. Inclusion in a clinical trial if relapse or loss of response should be considered if available.
Figure 16.2 Main molecular targets of new transduction inhibitors in MDS.
Chapter 17
Figure 17.1 Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC).
Source:
Reproduced from Sievers and Senter 2013, Reference 1 with permission of Annual Reviews.
Figure 17.2 Antigen-dependent B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and its targeting by small-molecule inhibitors. Antigen binding induces the aggregation of the BCR with its co-receptors CD79 A and B, which become phosphorylated by the tyrosine kinases LYN and SYK. SYK activates phosphoinositide 3
–
kinase (PI3Kδ), which in turn converts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate PIP3. PIP3 serves as a docking site for the cytoplasmic kinases Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and AKT. BTK phosphorylates and thereby activates phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLCγ2), which in turn generates a set of second messengers to activate protein kinase C beta (PKCβ). PKCβ phosphorylates IκB kinase (IKK) to activate nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) transcription factors that regulate gene expression of several survival factors. The kinases inhibited by small molecules with promising clinical activity are indicated.
Source:
Reproduced from Wiester 2013, © 2013, Reference 15 with permission of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Figure 17.3 Potential effects of immunomodulatory agents in lymphomas.
Source:
Reproduced from Chanan-Khan and Cheson 2008, Reference 78 with permission of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Chapter 18
Figure 18.1 Molecular subclasses of GBM and their genomic molecular correlates. Genomic alterations and survival associated with five molecular subtypes of GBM. Expression and DNA methylation profiles were used to classify 332 GBMs with available (native DNA and whole genome amplified DNA) exome sequencing and DNA copy-number levels. The most significant genomic associations were identified through Chi-Square tests, with
p
-values corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Reproduced from Brennan et al., 2013, Reference 14 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 18.2 Pathway alterations in GBM. Overall alteration rate summarized for canonical PI3K/MAPK, TP53 and RB regulatory pathways. Reproduced from Brennan et al., 2013, Reference 14 with permission from Elsevier.
Chapter 20
Figure 20.1 Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeting using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), cetuximab and panitumumab. Epithelial cells are stimulated by EGF to activate multiple signaling cascades that initiate mRNA transcription and translation to protein that leads to migration, invasion, survival and proliferation. EGFR is inhibited by these mAbs. The proteins in these signaling cascades are defined as folows: (1) growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) → son of sevenless (SOS) → rat sarcoma (Ras) → rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) → microtubule-associated protein kinase (MAPK)-extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK and MEK); (2) sarcoma (Src) → signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT); (3) Janus kinase (JAK) → STAT; (4) phosphatidylinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K) → v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT) → mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) that is inhibited by phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN).
Figure 20.2 Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeting uses monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bevacizumab and aflibercept. Vascular endothelial cells are stimulated by VEGF to activate multiple signaling cascades that initiate mRNA transcription and translation to protein that initiate migration, invasion, survival and proliferation and alter vascular permeability along with angiogenesis. The key signaling cascades are defined in Figure 20.1. Regorafennib is a potent multi-target kinase inhibitor that prevents the phosphorylation and activation of multiple VEGFR isoforms 1–3 along with numerous other targets.
Chapter 21
Figure 21.1 Relevant pathways and druggable targets in endometrial cancer. Abbreviations: PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PIP3, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; AKT, v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1; mTORC1, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1; mTORC2, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2; S6K, ribosomal protein S6kinase beta-1; Ras, rat sarcoma gene; Raf, v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1; MEK, mitogen activated protein kinase kinase; ERK, mitogen activated protein kinase; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 1; LKB1, liver kinase B1; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate kinase; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; AMP, adenosine, monophosphate; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HER2, epidermal growth factor 2 receptor; IGF-1R, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor; FGFR2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; TGFα, transforming growth factor α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; MLH1, mutL homolog 1; PARP, poly ADP-ribose polymerase; ER, estrogen receptor. Asterisks indicate druggable targets that have been or are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Highly prevalent alterations, such as p53 and E-cadherin, remain major obstacles for conventional drug design.
Chapter 23
Figure 23.1 Trial design by Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium. LCMC trials are designed to match a targeted agent to the specific mutation. Crizotinib is an inhibitor of MET, ALK, and ROS1. Dacomitinib is a second-generation EGFR TKI. Both dabrafenib and trametinib are MEK inhibitors. ERL is erlotinib and ARQ197 is a MET inhibitor.
Chapter 24
Figure 24.1 Physiologic MAP kinase signaling and constitutively active BRAF in the setting of a V600 mutation. RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; B-/CRAF, BRAF or CRAF.
Figure 24.2 Mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibitor therapy.
Chapter 28
Figure 28.1 A model for DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) generated by androgen receptor (AR) recruitment of TOP2B during initiation of transcription at target genes. DHT, dihydrotestosterone; DNA-PK, DNA-dependent protein kinase; PARP1, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1; ATM, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Source:
Reproduced from Haffner et al., 2011, Reference
13
with permission of American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).
Figure 28.2 Abiraterone, a CYP17 inhibitor, further reduces androgen levels when used to treat CRPC. Prostate cancers can progress despite abiraterone therapy, becoming androgen independent, either via maintained addiction to AR signaling (androgen-receptor dependent) or by abandoning AR signaling (androgen-receptor independent).
Source:
Reproduced from Nelson et al., 2011, Reference
166
with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 28.3 Mechanisms of resistance to AR-directed therapies. Progression to CRPC after initial treatments targeting androgen action often reflects persistent addiction to AR signaling, permitting the successful use of second-generation anti-androgens. Ultimately, both AR-dependent and -independent clones can emerge.
Source:
Reproduced from Reference
21
.
Chapter 29
Figure 29.1 Signaling pathways and targeted agents in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Chapter 30
Figure 30.1 Proposed integration of molecular analysis/next-generation sequencing into clinical practice.
Chapter 31
Figure 31.1 Simplified diagram of the MAPK signaling pathway. Following stimulation of a cell-surface receptor (e.g., KIT), intracellular proteins become activated while recruiting SOS1 which exchanges GTP-GDP in RAS (GDP is the inactive form). RAS activation subsequently stimulates RAF (BRAF, RAF1), MEK (MEK1A1, MEK1A2), and, ERK (ERK1, ERK2). The GDP-GTP balance is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs).
Figure 31.2 Genotypes and phenotypes in malignant melanomas.
Figure 31.3 Primary and secondary resistance to BRAF inhibitors.
Chapter 32
Figure 32.1 The frequency of mutations in major PI3K pathway components across common cancers. Data from the COSMIC database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/cosmic/) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering cbio database (http://cbio.mskcc.org/gdac-portal/index.do). Carcinoma categories are not separated by subtype. The tumor suppressor TP53 (p53), the most mutated gene in cancer, is shown for comparison. Deletions and chromosomal rearrangements in PTEN are not included.
Figure 32.2 Canonical Class I PI3K activation. RTK ligand binding leads to RTK autophosphorylation and recruitment of class IA PI3K heterodimers via interaction between RTK phosphotyrosine residues and SH2 domains on p85. Binding releases the basal p85 inhibition of the catalytic p110 PI3K subunit, thereby freeing p110 to catalyze the conversion of PIP2 to PIP3. Also shown is an alternate activation mechanism through adaptor proteins whereby PI3K is bound to activated RAS which stabilizes PI3K plasma membrane localization and activation of the p110 catalytic domain.
Figure 32.3 AKT as a primary class I PI3K effector. Following PI3K-mediated conversion of PI-4,5-P2 to PIP3 AKT becomes localized to the plasma membrane via binding of the PH domain of AKT to PIP3. AKT is then fully activated by T308 and S473 phosphorylation by PDK1 and mTORC2, respectively. Numerous AKT substrates are outlined. Source: Vanhaesebroeck et al., 2012.
30
Reproduced with permission from Nature Publishing Group.
Figure 32.4 The importance of mTOR in cancer. Panel A shows the major cellular processes regulated by mTORC1 and mTORC2 demonstrating their role in tumorigenesis and progression. Panel Ba depicts the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in the absence of mTOR inhibitors and panel Bb, Bc, and Bd demonstrate effects of rapamycin, mTOR catalytic inhibitors, and dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Source: Zoncu et al., 2011.
31
Reproduced with permission from Nature Publishing Group.
Chapter 33
Figure 33.1 Repair of double-strand breaks. (a) Double-strand break is rejoined end-to-end. (b) A double-strand break is repaired with the help of a homologous undamaged DNA (shown in orange). Strand invasion allows resynthesis on complementary sequence, followed by a resolution of the strands and rejoining.
Figure 33.2 Synthetic lethality. Single-strand DNA breaks can be repaired by BER. PARPi block BER leading to conversion of SSB to DSBs. In
BRCA wt
cells, HR repair DSBs. However, BRCA1/2-mutant cells are deficient in HRR and unable to repair DSBs. Treating cancer cells with mutations in
BRCA1/2
with PARPi causes cell death via synthetic lethality.
Chapter 35
Figure 35.1 Activation of the KIT tyrosine kinase receptor. The natural ligand for KIT, stem cell factor (SCF, orange oval) binds to the extracellular region of KIT resulting in dimerization and autophosphorylation of intracellular tyrosine residues. The conformational change resulting from autophosphorylation perpetuates the further phosphorylation of other tyrosine residues that serve as sites that initiate downstream signaling. Activating mutations in the KIT gene result in the constitutive activation (not needing SCF initiation) of the KIT protein.
Chapter 36
Figure 36.1 Inactivation of wild-type p53 in cancer. p53 inactivation may be achieved at least by MDM2/MDMX overexpression, reduced ATM/ARF expression, HPV infection, and nuclear exclusion of p53. HPV-E6, human papillomavirus E6 protein.
Figure 36.2 Agents targeting wild-type p53, MDM2, or MDMX. p53 binding, p53-binding domain; AD, acidic domain; Zn2+, zinc finger domain; RING, RING domain; TA, transactivation domain; DBD, DNA-binding domain; NES, nuclear export signal; RITA, reactivation of p53 and induction of tumor cell apoptosis.
Cover
Table of Contents
Preface
vii
viii
ix
x
xi
xiii
xv
xvii
1
3
4
5
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
113
114
115
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
152
153
154
155
156
157
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
303
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
361
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
James Abbruzzese, MD
Division of Medical Oncology
Duke Cancer Institute
Durham, NC, USA
Maen Abdelrahim, MD, PhD
Department of Internal Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, TX, USA
Abass Alavi, MD, MD(Hon.), PhD(Hon.), DSc(Hon.)
Department of Radiology
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Kenneth C. Anderson, MD, PhD
LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Myeloma Center
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA, USA
Michael Andreeff, MD, PhD
Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Analia Azaro, MD
Early Clinical Drug Development Group
Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Susana Banerjee, MBBS, MA, MRCP, PhD
The Royal Marsden Hospital
London, UK
Robert C. Bast, MD
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Susanne H. C. Baumeister, MD
Department of Pediatric Oncology
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, MA
Division of Hematology-Oncology
Boston Children's Hospital
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Giada Bianchi, MD
LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Myeloma Center
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA, USA
Patrick Boland, MD
Department of Medicine
Temple University School of Medicine
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Jessica L. Bowser, PhD
Department of Pathology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Russell R. Broaddus, MD, PhD
Department of Pathology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA, USA
Lewis C. Cantley, PhD
Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, NY, USA
Robert L. Coleman, MD
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine
Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNA
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Anthony P. Conley, MD
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Jorge Cortes, MD
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
M. Angelica Cortez, PhD
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Carlo M. Croce, MD
Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics
Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH, USA
Jasmine Quynh Dao, MD
Children's Cancer Hospital
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
John F. de Groot, MD
Department of Neuro-Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Yves A. DeClerck, MD
Division of Hematology-Oncology
Department of Pediatrics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
The Saban Research Institute of Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Department of Medicine
Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics
The University of Chicago
Chicago, IL, USA
Gianpiero Di Leva, PhD
Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics
Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH, USA
Glenn Dranoff, MD, PhD
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Human Gene Transfer Laboratory Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, MA, USA
Hua Fang, PhD
Division of Hematology-Oncology
The Saban Research Institute of Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Department of Medicine
Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics
The University of Chicago
Chicago, IL, USA
Omotayo Fasan, MRCP
Department of Medicine
Temple University School of Medicine
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, NC, USA
Keith T. Flaherty, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, MA, USA
David Fogelman, MD
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Matthew D. Galsky, MD
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology
The Tisch Cancer Institute
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, NY, USA
Guillermo García-Manero, MD
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Benjamin A. Gartrell, MD
Department of Medical Oncology
Montefiore Medical Center
The Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bronx, NY, USA
Gabriel Ghiaur, MD, PhD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD, USA
Michael C. Haffner, MD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Brady Urological Institute
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD, USA
Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD
Department of Medicine
Division of Medical Oncology
Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center
New Haven, CT, USA
Ashley M. Holder, MD
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
David Hong, MD
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Jean-Pierre J. Issa, MD
Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology
Temple University School of Medicine
Philadelphia, USA
Elias Jabbour, MD
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Nitin Jain, MD
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Preetesh Jain, MD, DM, PhD
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Filip Janku, MD, PhD
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program)
Division of Cancer Medicine
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Milind Javle, MD
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Richard J. Jones, MD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD, USA
Stan Kaye, MD
The Royal Marsden hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research
London, UK
Samuel J. Klempner, MD
Division of Hematology/Oncology
University of California Irvine Health
Orange, CA, USA
Birgit Knoechel, MD, PhD
Boston Children's Hospital
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA, USA
Kensuke Kojima, MD, PhD
Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, FACP
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Patricia Kropf, MD
Department of Medicine
Temple University School of Medicine
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Razelle Kurzrock, MD
Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, CA, USA
Jens G. Lohr, MD, PhD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, MA, USA
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA, USA
David Menter, PhD
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics
Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy
Department of Surgical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Larissa A. Meyer, MD, MPH
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Marcus M. Monroe, MD
Department of Otolaryngology
University of Utah School of Medicine
Salt Lake City, UT
Guillermo Montalbán-Bravo, MD
Department of Hematology
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Spain
Daniel Morgensztern, MD
Department of Medicine
Division of Medical Oncology
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO, USA
Javier Munoz, MD, FACP
Division of Hematology/Oncology
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gilbert, AZ, USA
Andrea P. Myers, MD, PhD
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Cambridge, MA, USA
Jeffrey N. Myers, MD, PhD
Department of Head and Neck Surgery
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
William G. Nelson, MD, PhD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Brady Urological Institute
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD, USA
Barbara J. O'Brien, MD
Department of Neuro-Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Susan O'Brien, MD
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
William K. Oh, MD
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology
The Tisch Cancer Institute
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, NY, USA
Shreyaskumar Patel, MD
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Saeed Rafii, MD, PhD, MRCP
Institute of Cancer Sciences
The University of Manchester and The Christie Hospital
Manchester, UK
Farhad Ravandi-Kashani, MD
Department of Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Vinod Ravi, MD
Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Jordi Rodon, MD
Early Clinical Drug Development Group
Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Rabih Said, MD, MPH
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Department of Internal Medicine
The University of Texas Health Science Center
Houston, TX, USA
Allison C. Sharrow, PhD
Department of Pathology
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD, USA
Department of Cancer Immunotherapeutics and Tumor Immunology
Beckman Research Institute
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, CA, USA
Alexander C. Small, MD
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology
The Tisch Cancer Institute
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, NY, USA
Sonali M. Smith, MD
Department of Medicine
The University of Chicago
Chicago, IL, USA
Anil K. Sood, MD
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine
Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNA
Department of Cancer Biology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Richard M. Stone, MD
Department of Medical Oncology
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, MA, USA
Chad Tang, MD
Department of Radiation Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Morgan Taylor, MD
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Drew A. Torigian, MD, MA, FSAR
Department of Radiology
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Davis Torrejon, MD
Early Clinical Drug Development Group
Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou, MD, PhD
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Thanh-Trang Vo, PhD
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
University of California Irvine
Irvine, CA, USA
Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA
Division of Hematology/Oncology
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, NE, USA
Saiama N. Waqar, MBBS, MSCI
Department of Medicine
Division of Medical Oncology
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO, USA
Shiao-Pei Weathers, MD
Department of Neuro-Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
James W. Welsh, MD
Department of Radiation Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Ofir Wolach, MD
Adult Leukemia Program
Department of Medical Oncology
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, MA, USA
Scott E. Woodman, MD, PhD
Departments of Melanoma Medical Oncology and Systems Biology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, MD, PhD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Brady Urological Institute
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD, USA
Jian Q. (Michael) Yu, MD, FRCPC
Department of Diagnostic Imaging
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, PA, USA
W. K. Alfred Yung, MD
Department of Neuro-Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
Patrick A. Zweidler-McKay, MD, PhD
Children's Cancer Hospital
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX, USA
While our knowledge of cancer at a cellular and molecular level has increased exponentially over the last decades, progress in the clinic has been more gradual, largely depending upon empirical trials using combinations of individually active anti-cancer drugs to treat the average patient. The challenge for the immediate future is to accelerate the pace of progress in clinical cancer care by enhancing the bidirectional interaction between laboratory and clinic. Our new understanding of human cancer biology and the heterogeneity of cancers at a molecular level must be used to identify novel targets for therapy, prevention, and detection focused on each individual. Barriers must be removed to facilitate the flow of targeted agents and fresh approaches from the laboratory to the clinic, while returning relevant human specimens, images, and data from the clinic to the laboratory for further analysis.
An Introduction to Translational Cancer Research provides a brief overview of current understanding of human cancer biology that is driving interests in targeted therapy and personalized management. Further development of molecular diagnostics should facilitate earlier detection, more precise prognostication, and prediction of response across the spectrum of cancer development. Targeted therapy has already had a dramatic impact on several forms of cancer and strategies are being developed to identify small groups of patients who would benefit from novel targeted drugs in combination with each other or with more conventional surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. Development of personalized interventions—whether preventive or therapeutic in nature—will require multidisciplinary teams of investigators and the infrastructure to match patient samples and agents in real time.
To accelerate translational cancer research, greater alignment will be required between academic institutions, the National Cancer Institute, the Food and Drug Administration, foundations, pharma, and community oncologists. Ultimately, new approaches to prevention, detection, and therapy must be sustainable. In the long run, translational research and personalized management can reduce the cost of cancer care, which has escalated in recent years. More accurate and specific identification of at-risk members and risk stratification will be helpful to minimize the risks of over-diagnosis and over-treatment, while maximizing the benefits of screening, early detection, and preventive intervention. Patients who would benefit most can be identified and funds saved by avoiding treatment in those whose cancers would not respond. Participation and education of community oncologists will be required, as will modification of practice patterns. For progress in the clinic to occur at an optimal pace, leaders of translational teams must envision a clear path to bring new concepts and new agents from the laboratory to the clinic, to complete pharmaceutical or biological development, to obtain regulatory approval and to bring new strategies for detection, prevention, and treatment to patients in the community.
In a series of additional volumes regarding translational cancer research, several topics are explored in greater depth, including gene therapy by viral and non-viral vectors, biomarkers, immunotherapy, and this volume concerning targeted therapy. The purpose of these books has been not only to describe different strategies for controlling particular forms of cancer but also to identify some of the barriers to translation using different reagents or different strategies around common therapeutic or diagnostic modalities. Potential barriers are many and include the need for a deeper understanding of science, methods to overcome the challenge of tumor heterogeneity, the development of targeted therapies, the availability of patients with an appropriate phenotype and genotype within a research center with the investigators, research teams and infrastructure required for clinical/translational research and the design of novel trials, adequate financial support, a viable connection to diagnostic and pharmaceutical development, and a strategy for regulatory approval as well as for dissemination in the community.
Targeted Therapy in Translational Cancer Research considers many of these areas. Principles are beginning to emerge for identifying therapeutic targets. A critical issue is how best to combine therapies against different targets within the same cancer if we are to develop effective personalized care. Tumor initiating cells must be eliminated as well as their progeny. Not only the cancer cells but tumor vessels and microenvironment can be targeted. While a separate volume will consider immunotherapy, a chapter on principles of immunotherapeutic targeting has been included, because of the rapid progress in this area. A better understanding of epigenetic and miRNA regulation has suggested new approaches to targeted therapy. The current status of targeted therapy for individual hematologic neoplasms and solid cancers has been reviewed extensively. As several major molecular targets and signaling pathways—TP53, PARP, Met, Kit, PI3K, and Ras/MAP—are important to cancers at multiple sites, chapters have also been devoted to strategies for their inhibition. Overall, this volume includes substantial perspective regarding the translational potential of targeted therapy that should provide useful information for investigators and clinicians.
Robert C. Bast
Maurie Markman
Ernest Hawk
As a busy clinical oncologist/hematologist striving to be current in preparing to see a new patient, or as a clinical investigator trying to determine what might be the best new approach for the patient with advanced refractory cancer, this volume titled Targeted Therapy in Translational Cancer Research can be of enormous help. In addition, for the young or experienced bench scientist this offering gives both a basic background and an important grounding in the current field of clinical targeted therapies.
The above comments should come as no surprise given the deep experience of the editors and the contributors to this volume.
In a review of the parts of this volume there is excellent coverage of (a) the principles of targeted therapies; (b) specific targeted therapies in the hematologic and solid malignancies; and (c) coverage of targeted therapies for specific molecular aberrations. As one drills down into the well-written individual chapters there is excellent coverage of the current state of the art plus meaningful coverage of how the field is evolving.
It is gratifying to see chapters on functional imaging, the issue of combining targeted therapies, targeted immunotherapies, the microenvironment, microRNAs, and tackling tough targets such as Ras and TP53.
The chapter on specific organ types of cancer are both practical for us to catch up on the best treatments and yet comprehensive enough to see how the treatments are evolving.
All in all, this is a wonderful volume to aid all of us in a practical and deeper understanding of targeted therapies. Congratulations to the contributors and editors of this special volume.
Daniel D. Von Hoff, MD, FACP
In the last decade, emergent technologies have enhanced our understanding of genomic, transcriptional, proteomic, epigenetic, and immune mechanisms in carcinogenesis. This improved understanding has enabled the development of targeted cancer therapies and transformed conventional treatment paradigms; it has provided the framework for the discovery of new targets, for validation of novel agents, for combination therapies predicated upon scientific rationale, and for clinical trials that have already markedly improved the prognosis and outcome of patients with cancer. Excitingly, the implication of immunomodulatory targets in carcinogenesis has led to the development of new promising drugs based on the central principle that breaking tolerance using immune checkpoint blockers can achieve durable responses. Moreover, although distinct pathways are initially analyzed independently, interdependent and compensatory mechanisms have derived innovative combinations of targeted, immunomodulating, antiangiogenic, and/or chemotherapeutic agents, which have additive or synergistic cytotoxicity and can overcome resistance to conventional therapies. Continued progress will require improved genomic classification of the various tumor types, delineation of the mechanisms of resistance to treatment and disease progression, and improved understanding of metastasis, ultimately allowing for provision of therapies designed to target tumor heterogeneity early in the disease course.
This edition of Targeted Therapy in Translational Cancer Research
