The Definitive Collection on Esoteric Transformation – 4 Foundational Mystical Teachings E-Book
S. L. Macgregor Mathers
0,49 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: e-artnow Collections
- Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
- Sprache: Englisch
Delve into the enigmatic world of mysticism and spiritual evolution with 'The Definitive Collection on Esoteric Transformation – 4 Foundational Mystical Teachings.' This anthology stands as a trinity of literary and spiritual exploration, threading together a kaleidoscope of themes such as alchemical transmutation, the arcane symbolism of the subconscious, and the celestial architecture of the human soul. With a diverse array of styles ranging from the didactic to the narrative, these texts invite the reader into a realm where the mystic and the modern converge, providing a rich tapestry of ideas that challenge and enlighten. Comprised of works by pivotal figures such as S. L. MacGregor Mathers, Herbert Silberer, Max Heindel, and William Walker Atkinson, the collection embodies an intertextual dialogue that transcends mere historical analysis. These authors, each a cornerstone in their own right, bring with them the legacies of Western esotericism, the Rosicrucian quest for enlightenment, and the New Thought movement. Such a confluence of voices, rooted in diverse mystical traditions, offers profound insights into the spiritual quintessence, captivating scholars and seekers alike. For those willing to embark on an introspective journey, this anthology provides an unparalleled vista into esoteric philosophies. As a microcosm of esoteric thought, readers stand to gain not only an understanding of each author's philosophy but an appreciation for the collective discourse that these teachings represent. A vital resource for scholars and spiritualists, the collection offers a multidimensional perspective, fostering a timeless dialogue that enriches and expands the boundaries of mystical understanding. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - An Introduction draws the threads together, discussing why these diverse authors and texts belong in one collection. - Historical Context explores the cultural and intellectual currents that shaped these works, offering insight into the shared (or contrasting) eras that influenced each writer. - A collective Analysis highlights common themes, stylistic variations, and significant crossovers in tone and technique, tying together writers from different backgrounds. - Reflection questions encourage readers to compare the different voices and perspectives within the collection, fostering a richer understanding of the overarching conversation.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2026
Ähnliche
The Definitive Collection on Esoteric Transformation – 4 Foundational Mystical Teachings
Table of Contents
Introduction
The works gathered in this collection are united by a common ambition: to describe transformation as an inner science expressed through symbolic, mystical, and initiatory language. In The Kabbalah Unveiled, The Rosicrucian Mysteries, The Secret Doctrines of the Rosicrucians, and Hidden Symbolism of Alchemy and the Occult Arts, spiritual development appears not as vague uplift but as disciplined passage through layered realities of meaning. Each title points toward concealed structures beneath ordinary appearances, whether named as Kabbalah, Rosicrucian doctrine, alchemy, or occult art. Together they present esotericism as a sustained inquiry into how the human being may be interpreted, refined, and reoriented toward a higher order of understanding.
A central thread among these books is the conviction that truth is veiled and must be approached through symbols, correspondences, and graduated insight. The very language of unveiling, mysteries, secret doctrines, and hidden symbolism suggests a shared drama of disclosure in which knowledge is both protected and revealed. These works imply that what is most important cannot be reduced to surface statement alone, but requires interpretation of images, emblems, metaphysical schemes, and traditional teachings. The collection therefore coheres as a map of esoteric reading itself, showing how mystical traditions invite the reader to move from outer form to inner significance and from inherited signs to transformed consciousness.
The texts also converse through their treatment of the human person as a site of mediation between visible and invisible worlds. Kabbalah, Rosicrucian teaching, and alchemical symbolism all imply that the self is not fixed or exhausted by ordinary identity. Instead, the individual appears as capable of ascent, purification, regeneration, or reintegration within a larger cosmic pattern. This shared concern gives the collection a distinct moral and spiritual seriousness. The goal is not mere curiosity about hidden subjects, but a reconfiguration of perception and being. Across differing vocabularies, the books suggest that to know reality more fully is also to undergo a demanding process of inward change.
At the same time, the collection gains depth from contrast. The Kabbalah Unveiled signals commentary on the Books of Zohar and thus carries the authority of an interpretive engagement with a foundational mystical corpus. The Rosicrucian Mysteries presents itself as an elementary exposition, suggesting a clarifying and pedagogical tone. The Secret Doctrines of the Rosicrucians emphasizes doctrine, inviting attention to systematic teaching, while Hidden Symbolism of Alchemy and the Occult Arts foregrounds symbolism and the interpretive life of images. These differences in genre and emphasis prevent the collection from collapsing into sameness. Instead, they stage a rich exchange between commentary, exposition, doctrinal synthesis, and symbolic analysis.
Recurring dilemmas link these perspectives even where their accents differ. Each work belongs to traditions that must balance secrecy with communication, inheritance with explanation, and metaphysical breadth with the limits of language. The titles themselves point to that tension: what is hidden seeks disclosure, yet disclosure must preserve depth rather than flatten it. Likewise, each tradition confronts the problem of how spiritual truths are embodied in systems, rites, symbols, or cosmologies without becoming mere abstractions. Read together, these books illuminate a common esoteric challenge: how to transmit transformative knowledge in forms that instruct the mind while awakening capacities that exceed ordinary conceptual habits.
This convergence helps explain the continuing resonance of such a collection in contemporary culture. Mystical and occult traditions remain potent sources for artistic imagination, symbolic thinking, and reflections on consciousness, identity, and the unseen dimensions of experience. The themes gathered here speak to enduring efforts to reconnect intellect with imagination and spiritual aspiration with disciplined interpretation. Even for readers approaching these works as historical expressions of esoteric thought, they offer a vocabulary for examining the human desire for hidden order and meaningful transformation. Their continued presence in cultural discourse reflects a persistent attraction to teachings that join cosmology, psychology, and symbolic form.
Taken together, these four works form a coherent field of reflection on esoteric transformation in its major registers: revelation, initiation, doctrine, and symbol. S. L. MacGregor Mathers, Max Heindel, William Walker Atkinson, and Herbert Silberer represent distinct approaches, yet their books meet in the belief that the visible world is threaded with deeper patterns and that human life may be altered by learning to read them. The result is not a single system but a many-sided exploration of mystical knowledge as practice, interpretation, and inward metamorphosis. As a collection, these texts trace a compelling intellectual and spiritual conversation whose themes remain vivid and generative.
Historical Context
Socio-Political Landscape
S. L. MacGregor Mathers’s The Kabbalah Unveiled emerged in late Victorian Britain, where imperial confidence coexisted with anxiety about secularization, class strain, and the authority of established churches. Esoteric study offered educated readers an alternative language for order, hierarchy, and revelation at a moment when biblical criticism and comparative religion challenged inherited certainties. Mathers’s translation and commentary on the Zohar participated in debates over who could interpret sacred antiquity and how non-Christian traditions might be absorbed into Western spiritual frameworks. Its atmosphere reflects elite occult circles shaped by urban intellectual networks, private societies, and a fascination with secret lineages.
Max Heindel’s The Rosicrucian Mysteries and William Walker Atkinson’s The Secret Doctrines of the Rosicrucians belong to the early twentieth-century Anglo-American occult revival, a milieu marked by rapid industrialization, expanding print culture, and democratic access to spiritual instruction. Their works answered social dislocation with disciplined cosmologies promising personal regeneration and hidden law beneath modern instability. They also reflect a Protestant-inflected environment in which individual conscience carried unusual authority, allowing esoteric teachers to bypass ecclesiastical mediation. In this setting, Rosicrucian language could speak simultaneously to spiritual aspiration, middle-class self-culture, and a broader hunger for moral certainty amid technological acceleration.
Herbert Silberer’s Hidden Symbolism of Alchemy and the Occult Arts was shaped by Central European tensions before and after the First World War, when faith in rational progress had been deeply shaken. In that context, alchemy and occult imagery appeared not merely antiquarian but psychologically urgent, offering symbolic resources for interpreting crisis, fragmentation, and inward conflict. Silberer wrote within a world where scholarly authority, medical discourse, and esoteric traditions competed to explain human motivation. His treatment reflects the era’s broader instability: political orders were becoming more brittle, inherited certainties less secure, and symbolic interpretation increasingly attractive as a way to recover coherence from social and intellectual upheaval.
Intellectual & Aesthetic Currents
Mathers’s work stands at the intersection of Romantic medievalism, philology, ceremonial occultism, and the nineteenth-century fascination with comparative mysticism. The Kabbalah Unveiled treats the Zohar as both a textual artifact and a living reservoir of metaphysical structure, aligning with an age that prized hidden correspondences between language, number, cosmos, and ritual. Its interpretive style reflects the period’s confidence that disciplined scholarship could recover primordial wisdom, even while it freely blended translation, commentary, and esoteric synthesis. The result is characteristic of fin-de-siècle aesthetics: ornate, symbolic, and drawn toward systems that reconcile poetry, theology, and metaphysical architecture.
Heindel and Atkinson wrote in an atmosphere shaped by Theosophical diffusion, New Thought, occult pedagogy, and the rising language of spiritual evolution. Both works organize Rosicrucian themes into accessible explanatory schemes, reflecting a modern preference for instructional prose, quasi-scientific vocabulary, and portable doctrine. Their audiences expected esotericism to be teachable, practical, and compatible with progress rather than confined to arcane ritual communities. This pedagogical style also resonates with broader cultural movements favoring self-improvement and mental discipline. The secret teaching becomes less a sealed inheritance than a structured curriculum, framed to satisfy readers seeking synthesis among religion, psychology, ethics, and cosmology.
Silberer’s study is deeply informed by symbolist sensibility and by the emergence of depth-oriented psychological interpretation. Hidden Symbolism of Alchemy and the Occult Arts treats alchemical images as layered expressions of psychic life, thereby linking older hermetic materials with modern theories of dream, fantasy, and inward transformation. This move reflects a broader intellectual current that valued symbols not as decorative obscurities but as dynamic vehicles of meaning. Aesthetic modernism’s interest in fragmentation, ambiguity, and hidden pattern forms an important backdrop. Silberer thus occupies a transitional position, where occult diagrams, literary symbolism, and psychological investigation converge into a distinctly early twentieth-century hermeneutic.
Across the anthology, a common current is the recasting of esoteric tradition through modern print, translation, and system-building. These books transform dispersed mystical materials into coherent pathways for readers outside traditional initiatory settings, reflecting confidence in publication as a means of spiritual transmission. Their formal choices—commentary, exposition, doctrinal summary, symbolic analysis—show the influence of encyclopedic habits of thought and the period’s appetite for ordered knowledge. At the same time, each text preserves an aesthetic of secrecy by suggesting deeper layers beyond what is plainly stated. This balance between accessibility and reserve became a defining feature of modern occult literature and its enduring appeal.
Legacy & Reassessment Across Time
The Kabbalah Unveiled has had a durable afterlife as one of the most influential English gateways to the Zohar, especially for readers in occult and mystical circles. Its significance lies not only in what it transmitted but in how it framed Kabbalah for modern esoteric consumption, emphasizing universal metaphysics and symbolic correspondences. Later reassessment has been divided: admirers credit Mathers with opening difficult material to a broad audience, while critics note the selective, highly interpretive nature of his approach. As scholarship on Jewish mysticism became more rigorous, the work increasingly came to be read both as a historical artifact of occult reception and as a formative modern mediation.
Heindel’s The Rosicrucian Mysteries has been repeatedly revisited as a key example of esotericism adapting itself to mass readership without surrendering claims to initiatory depth. Its explanatory clarity helped sustain long-term influence among readers seeking a spiritually serious alternative to dogmatic religion. Over time, however, scholars and critics have examined how such texts simplify, universalize, and reorganize inherited Rosicrucian motifs to fit modern expectations about evolution, ethics, and self-development. This reassessment has not erased the book’s importance; rather, it has clarified its role in translating esoteric authority into a pedagogical idiom suited to twentieth-century spiritual culture.
Atkinson’s The Secret Doctrines of the Rosicrucians and Silberer’s Hidden Symbolism of Alchemy and the Occult Arts have followed distinct but intersecting trajectories of reinterpretation. Atkinson’s work is often discussed as part of a broader current that blended Rosicrucian vocabulary with practical metaphysics and modern mental culture, prompting debate over authenticity, lineage, and adaptation. Silberer, by contrast, gained lasting attention through conversations linking alchemical symbolism to psychological interpretation. Later readers have valued his bridge between occult material and inner analysis, even as they question reductionist readings. Together, these books illustrate how esoteric texts survive by being repeatedly reframed through new intellectual priorities.
The Definitive Collection on Esoteric Transformation – 4 Foundational Mystical Teachings
Foundations of Western Esoteric Tradition
Symbolism, Inner Alchemy, and Transformative Practice
S. L. MacGregor Mathers
The Kabbalah Unveiled - Commentaries of the Books of Zohar
INTRODUCTION.
I. THE first questions which the non-qabalistical reader will probably ask are: What is the Qabalah? Who was its author? What are its sub-divisions? What are its general teachings? And why is a translation of it required at the present time?
2. I will answer the last question first. At the present time a powerful wave of occult thought is spreading through society; thinking men are beginning to awake to the fact that "there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamed of in their philosophy;" and, last but not least, it is now felt that the Bible, which has been probably more misconstrued than any other book ever written, contains numberless obscure and mysterious passages which are utterly unintelligible without some key wherewith to unlock their meaning. THAT KEY IS GIVEN IN THE QABALAH. Therefore this work should be of interest to every biblical and theological student. Let every Christian ask himself this question: "How can I think to understand the Old Testament if I be ignorant of the construction put upon it by that nation whose sacred book it formed; and if I know not the meaning of the Old Testament, how can I expect to understand the New?" Were the real and sublime philosophy of the Bible better known, there would be fewer fanatics and sectarians. And who can calculate the vastness of the harm done to impressionable and excitable persons by the bigoted enthusiasts who ever and anon come forward as teachers of the people? How many suicides are the result of religious mania and depression! What farragos of sacrilegious nonsense have not been promulgated as the true meanings of the books of the Prophets and the Apocalypse! Given a translation of the sacred Hebrew Book, in many instances incorrect, as the foundation, an inflamed and an ill-balanced mind as the worker thereon, what sort of edifice can be expected as the result? I say fearlessly to the fanatics and bigots of the present day: You have cast down the Sublime and Infinite One from His throne, and in His stead have placed the demon of unbalanced force; you have substituted a deity of disorder and of jealousy for a God of order and of love; you have perverted the teachings of the crucified One. Therefore at this present time an English translation of the Qabalah is almost a necessity, for the Zohar has never before been translated into the language of this country, nor, as far as I am aware, into any modern European vernacular.
3. The Qabalah may be defined as being the esoteric Jewish doctrine. It is called in Hebrew QBLH, Qabalah, which is derived from the root QBL, Qibel, meaning "to receive." This appellation refers to the custom of handing down the esoteric knowledge by oral transmission, and is nearly allied to "tradition."
4. As in the present work a great number of Hebrew or Chaldee words have to be used in the text, and the number of scholars in the Shemitic languages is limited, I have thought it more advisable to print such words in ordinary Roman characters, carefully retaining the exact orthography. I therefore append a table showing at a glance the ordinary Hebrew and Chaldee alphabet (which is common to both languages), the Roman characters by
which I have expressed its letters in this work; also their names, powers, and numerical values. There are no separate numeral characters in Hebrew and Chaldee; therefore, as is also the case in Greek, each letter has its own peculiar numerical value, and from this circumstance results the important fact that every word is a number, and every number is a word. This is alluded to in Revelations, where "the number of the beast" is mentioned, and on this correspondence between words and numbers the science of Gematria (the first division of the so-called literal Qabalah) is based. I shall refer to this subject again. I have selected the Roman letter Q to represent the Hebrew Qoph or Koph, a precedent for the use of which without a following m may be found in Max Müller's "Sacred Books of the East." The reader must remember that the Hebrew is almost entirely a consonantal alphabet, the vowels being for the most part supplied by small points and marks usually placed below the letters. Another difficulty of the Hebrew alphabet consists in the great similarity between the forms of certain letters--e.g., V, Z, and final N.
5. With regard to the author and origin of the Qabalah, I cannot do better than give the following extract from Dr. Ginsburg's "Essay on the Kabbalah," first premising that this word has been spelt in a great variety of ways--Cabala, Kabalah, Kabbala, &c. I have adopted the form Qabalah, as being more consonant with the Hebrew writing of the word.
6. "A system of religious philosophy, or, more properly, of theosophy, which has not only exercised for hundreds of years an extraordinary influence on the mental development of so shrewd a people as the Jews, but has captivated the minds of some of the greatest thinkers of Christendom in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, claims the greatest attention of both the philosopher and the theologian. When it is added that among its captives were Raymond Lully, the celebrated scholastic metaphysician and chemist (died 1315); John Reuchlin, the renowned scholar. and reviver of Oriental literature in Europe (born 1455, died 1522); John Picus de Mirandola, the famous philosopher and classical scholar (1463-1494); Cornelius Henry Agrippa, the distinguished philosopher, divine, and physician (1486-1535); John Baptist Von Helmont, a remarkable chemist and physician (1577-1644); as well as our own countrymen, Robert Fludd, the famous physician and philosopher (1574-1637); and Dr. Henry More (1614-1687); and that these men, after restlessly searching for a scientific system which should disclose to them 'the deepest depths' of the divine mature, and show them the real tie which binds all things together, found the cravings of their minds satisfied by this theosophy, the claims of the Kabbalah on the attention of students in literature and philosophy will readily be admitted. The claims of the Kabbalah, however, are not restricted to the literary man and the philosopher; the poet too will find in it ample materials for the exercise of his lofty genius. How can it be otherwise with a theosophy which, we are assured, was born of God in Paradise, was nursed and reared by the choicest of the angelic hosts in heaven, and only held converse with the holiest of man's children upon earth. Listen to the story of. its birth, growth, and maturity, as told by its followers.
7. "The Kabbalah was first taught by God himself to a select company of angels, who formed a theosophic school in Paradise. After the Fall the angels most graciously communicated this heavenly doctrine to the disobedient child of earth, to furnish the protoplasts with the means of returning to their pristine nobility and felicity. From Adam it passed over to Noah, and then to Abraham, the friend of God, who emigrated with it to Egypt, where the patriarch allowed a portion of this mysterious doctrine to ooze out. It was in this way that the Egyptians obtained some knowledge of it, and the other Eastern nations could introduce it into their philosophical systems. Moses, who was learned in all the wisdom of Egypt, was first initiated into the Qabalah in the land of his birth, but became most proficient in it during his wanderings in the wilderness, when he not only devoted to it the leisure hours of the whole forty years, but received lessons in it from one of the angels. By the aid of this mysterious science the law-giver was enabled to solve the difficulties which arose during his management of the Israelites, in spite of the pilgrimages, wars, and frequent miseries of the nation. He covertly laid down the principles of this secret doctrine in the first four books of the Pentateuch, but withheld them from Deuteronomy. Moses also initiated the seventy elders into the secrets of this doctrine, and they again transmitted them from hand to hand. Of all who formed the unbroken line of tradition, David and Solomon were the most deeply initiated into the Kabbalah. No one, however, dared to write it down, till Schimeon Ben Jochai, who lived at the time of the destruction of the second temple . . . . . After his death, his son, Rabbi Eleazar, and his secretary, Rabbi Abba, as well as his disciples, collated Rabbi Simon Ben Jochai's treatises, and out of these composed the celebrated work called ZHR, Zohar, splendour, which is the grand storehouse of Kabbalism."
8. The Qabalah is usually classed under four heads:
(α) The practical Qabalah.
(β) The literal Qabalah.
(γ) The unwritten Qabalah.
(δ) The dogmatic Qabalah.
9. The practical Qabalah deals with talismanic and ceremonial magic, and does not come within the scope of this work.
10. The literal Qabalah is referred to in several places, and therefore a knowledge of its leading principles is necessary. It is divided into three parts: GMTRIA, Gematria; NVTRIQVN, Notariqon; and ThMVRH, Temura.
12. Notariqon is derived from the Latin word nothrius, a shorthand writer. Of Notariqon there are two forms. In the first every letter of a word is taken for the initial or abbreviation of another word, so that from the letters of a word a sentence may be formed. Thus every letter of the word BRAShITh, Berashith, the first word in Genesis, is made the initial of a word, and we obtain BRAShITh RAH ALHIM ShIQBLV IShRAL ThVRH, Besrashith Rahi Eloim Sheyequebelo Israel Torah: "In the beginning the Elohim saw that Israel would accept the law." In this connection I may give six very interesting specimens of Notariqon formed from this same word BRAShITh by Solomon Meir Ben Moses, a Jewish Qabalist, who embraced the Christian faith in 1665, and took the name of Prosper Rugers. These have all a Christian tendency, and by their means Prosper converted another Jew, who had previously been bitterly opposed to Christianity. The first is BN RVCh AB ShLVShThM IChD ThMIM, Ben, Ruach, Ab, Shaloshethem Yechad Themim: "The Son, the Spirit, the Father, Their Trinity, Perfect Unity." The second is, BN RVCh AB ShLVShThM IChD ThOBVDV, Ben, Ruach, Ab, Shaloshethem Yechad Thaubodo: "The Son, the Spirit, the Father, ye shall equally worship Their Trinity." The third is, BKVRI RAShVNI AShR ShMV IShVO ThOBVDV, Bekori Rashuni Asher Shamo Yeshuah Thaubodo: "Ye shall worship My first-born, My first, Whose Name is Jesus." The fourth is, BBVA RBN AShR ShMV IShVO ThOBVDV, Beboa Rabban Asher Shamo Yesuah Thaubado: "When the Master shall come Whose Name is Jesus ye shall worship." The fifth is, BThVLH RAVIH ABChR ShThLD IShVO ThAShRVH, Bethulah Raviah Abachar Shethaled Yeshuah Thrashroah: "I will choose a virgin worthy to bring forth Jesus, and ye shall call her blessed." The sixth is, BOVGTh RTzPIM ASThThR ShGVPI IShVO ThAKLV, Beaugoth Ratzephim Assattar Shegopi Yeshuah Thakelo: "I will hide myself in cake (baked with) coals, for ye shall eat Jesus, My Body." The Qabalistical importance of these sentences as bearing upon the doctrines of Christianity can hardly be overrated.
13. The second form of Notariqon is the exact reverse of the first. By this the initials or finals, or both, or the medials, of a sentence, are taken to form a word or words. Thus the Qabalah is called ChKMh NSThRH, Chokhmah Nesethrah, "the secret wisdom;" and if we take the initials of these two words Ch and N, we form by the second kind of Notariqon the word ChN, Chen, "grace." Similarly, from the initials and finals of the words MI IOLH LNV HShMIMH, Mi Iaulah Leno Ha-Shamayima, "Who shall go up for us to heaven?" (Deut. xxx. 12), are formed MILH, Milah, "circumcision," and IHVH, the Tetragrammaton, implying that God hath ordained circumcision as the way to heaven.
14. Temura is permutation. According to certain rules, one letter is substituted for another letter preceding or following it in the alphabet, and thus from one word another word of totally different orthography may be formed. Thus the alphabet is bent exactly in half, in the middle, and one half is put over the other; and then by changing alternately the first letter or the first two letters at the beginning of the second line, twenty-two commutations are produced. These are called the "Table of the Combinations of TzIRVP," Tzirupa. For example's sake, I will give the method called ALBTh, Albath, thus:
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
K
I
T
Ch
Z
V
H
D
G
B
A
M
N
S
O
P
Tz
Q
R
Sh
Th
L
Each method takes its name from the first two pairs composing it, the system of pairs of letters being the groundwork of the whole, as either letter in a pair is substituted for the other letter. Thus, by Albath, from RVCh, Ruach, is formed DTzO, Detzau. The names of the other twenty-one methods are: ABGTh, AGDTh ADBG, AHBD, AVBH, AZBV, AChBZ, ATBCh, AIBT, AKBI, ALBK, AMBL, ANBM, ASBN, AOBS, APBO, ATzBP, AQBTz, ARBQ, AShBR, and AThBSh. To these must be added the modes ABGD and ALBM. Then comes the "Rational Table of Tziruph," another set of twenty-two combinations. There are also three "Tables of the Commutations," known respectively as the Right, the Averse, and the Irregular. To make any of these, a square, containing 484 squares, should be made, and the letters written in. For the "Right Table" write the alphabet across from right to left; in the second row of squares do the same, but begin with R and end with A; in the third begin with G and end with B; and so on. For the "Averse Table" write the alphabet from right to left backwards, beginning with Th and ending with A; in the second row begin with Sh and end with Th, &c. The "Irregular Table" would take too long to describe. Besides all these, there is the method called ThShRQ, Thashraq, which is simply writing a word backwards. There is one more very important form, called the "Qabalah of the Nine Chambers," or AIQ BKR, Aiq Bekar. It is thus formed:
300
30
3
200
20
2
100
10
1
000
00
0
000
00
0
000
00
0
Sh
L
G
R
K
B
Q
I
A
600
60
6
500
50
5
400
40
4
000
00
0
000
00
0
000
00
0
M final
S
V
K final
N
H
Th
M
D
900
90
9
800
80
8
700
70
7
000
00
0
000
00
0
000
00
0
T final
Tz
T
P final
P
Ch
N final
O
Z
I have put the numeration of each letter above to, show the affinity between the letters in each chamber. Sometimes this is used as a cipher, by taking the portions of the figure to show the letters they contain, putting one point for the first letter, two for the second, &c. Thus the right angle, containing AIQ, will answer for the letter Q if it have three dots or points within it. Again, a square will answer for H, N, or K final, according to whether it has one, two, or three points respectively placed within it. So also with regard to the other letters. But there are many other ways of employing the Qabalah of the Nine Chambers, which I have not space to describe. I will merely mention, as an example, that by the mode of Temura called AThBSh, Athbash, it is found that in Jeremiah xxv. 26, the word ShShK, Sheshakh, symbolizes BBL, Babel.
15. Besides all these rules, there are certain meanings hidden in the shape of the letters of the Hebrew alphabet; in the form of a particular letter at the end of a word being different from that which it generally bears when it is a final letter, or in a letter being written in the middle of a word in a character generally used only at the end; in any letter or letters being written in a size smaller or larger than the rest of the manuscript, or in a letter being written upside down; in the variations found in the spelling of certain words, which have a letter more in some places than they have in others; in peculiarities observed in the position of any of the points or accents, and in certain expressions supposed to be elliptic or redundant.
16. For example the shape of the Hebrew letter Aleph, A (see Plate I.), is said to symbolize a Vau, V, between a Yod, I, and a Daleth, D; and thus the letter itself represents the word IVD, Yod. Similarly the shape of the letter He, H, represents a Daleth, D, with a Yod, I, written at the lower left-hand corner, &c.
19. Other examples of deficient and redundant spelling, peculiarities of accent and pointing, &c., will be found in various places in the ensuing work.
21. Taking the whole of these mystical anagrams in proper order, Picus makes the following sentence out of this one word BRAShITh:--Pater in filio (aut per filium), principium et finem (sive quietum) creavit caput, ignem, et fundamentum magni hominis fœdere bono: "Through the Son hath the Father created that Head which is the beginning and the end, the fire-life and the foundation of the supernal man (the Adam Qadmon) by His righteous covenant." Which is a short epitome of the teachings of the "Book of Concealed Mystery." This notice of the literal Qabalah has already extended beyond its proper limits. It was, however, necessary to be thus explicit, as much of the metaphysical reasoning of the ensuing work turns on its application.
22. The term "Unwritten Qabalah" is applied to certain knowledge which is never entrusted to writing, but communicated orally. I may say no more on this point, not even whether I myself have or have not received it. Of course, till the time of Rabbi Schimeon Ben Jochai none of the Qabalah was ever written.
23. The Dogmatic Qabalah contains the doctrinal portion. There are a large number of treatises of various dates and merits which go to make up the written Qabalah, but they may be reduced to four heads:
(α) The Sepher Yetzirah and its dependencies.
(β) The Zohar with its developments and commentaries.
(γ) The Sepher Sephiroth and its expansions.
(δ) The Asch Metzareph and its symbolism.
24. The SPR ITzIRH, Sepher Yetzirah, or "Book of Formation," is ascribed to the patriarch Abraham. It treats of the cosmogony as symbolized by the ten numbers and the twenty-two. letters of the alphabet, which it calls the "thirty-two paths." On these latter Rabbi Abraham Ben Dior has written a mystical commentary. The term "path" is used throughout the Qabalah to signify a hieroglyphical idea, or rather the sphere of ideas, which may be attached to any glyph or symbol.
25. The ZHR, Zohar, or "Splendour," besides many other treatises of less note, contains the following most important books, of which the three first are translated in this volume:
(α) The SPRA DTzNIOVThA, Siphra Dtzenioutha, or "Book of Concealed Mystery," which is the root and foundation of the Zohar.
(β) The ADRA RBA QDIShA, Idra Rabba Qadisha or "Greater Holy Assembly:" this is a development of the "Book of Concealed Mystery."
(γ) The ADRA ZVTA QDIShA, Idra Zuta Qadisha, or "Lesser Holy Assembly;" which is in the nature of a supplement to the "Idra Rabba." These three books treat of the gradual development of the creative Deity, and with Him the Creation. The text of these works has been annotated by Knorr von Rosenroth (the author of the "Qabalah Denudata,") from the Mantuan, Cremonensian, and Lublinensian Codices, which are corrected printed copies; of these the Mantuan and Cremonensian are the oldest. A species of commentary is also given, which is distinguished from the actual text by being written within parentheses.
(δ) The pneumatical treatise called BITh ALHIM, Beth Elohim, or the "House of the Elohim," edited by Rabbi Abraham Cohen Irira, from the doctrines of Rabbi Yitzchaq Loria. It treats of angels, demons, elemental spirits, and souls.
(ε) The "Book of the Revolutions of Souls" is a peculiar and discursive treatise, and is an expansion of Rabbi Loria's ideas.
26. The SPR SPIRVTh, Sepher Sephiroth, or "Book of the Emanations," describes, so to speak, the gradual evolution of the Deity from negative into positive existence.
27. The ASh MTzRP, Asch Metzareph, or "Purifying Fire," is hermatic and alchemical, and is known to few, and when known is understood by still fewer.
28. The principal doctrines of the Qabalah are designed to solve the following problems:--
(α) The Supreme Being, His nature and attributes.
(β) The Cosmogony.
(γ) The creation of angels and man.
(δ) The destiny of man and angels.
(ε) The nature of the soul.
(ζ) The nature of angels, demons, and elementals.
(η) The import of the revealed law.
(θ) The transcendental symbolism of numerals.
(ι) The peculiar mysteries contained in the Hebrew letters.
(κ) The equilibrium of contraries.
29. The "Book of Concealed Mystery" opens with these words: "The Book of Concealed Mystery is the book of the equilibrium of balance." What is here meant by the terms "equilibrium of balance"? Equilibrium is that harmony which results from the analogy of contraries, it is the dead centre where, the opposition of opposing forces being equal in strength, rest succeeds motion. It is the central point. It is the "point within the circle" of ancient symbolism. It is the living synthesis of counterbalanced power. Thus form may be described as the equilibrium of light and shade; take away either factor, and form is viewless. The term balance is applied to the two opposite natures in each triad of the Sephiroth, their equilibrium forming the third Sephira in each ternary. I shall recur again to this subject in explaining the Sephiroth. This doctrine of equilibrium and balance is a fundamental qabalistical idea.
30. The "Book of Concealed Mystery" goes on to, state that this "Equilibrium hangeth in that region which is negatively existent." What is negative existence? What is positive existence? The distinction between these two is another fundamental idea. To define negative existence clearly is impossible, for when it is distinctly defined it ceases to be negative existence; it is then negative existence passing into static condition. Therefore wisely have the Qabalists shut out from mortal comprehension the primal AIN, Ain, the negatively existent One, and the AIN SVP, Ain Soph, the limitless Expansion; while of even the AIN SVP AVR, Ain Soph Aur, the illimitable Light, only a dim conception can be formed. Yet, if we think deeply, we shall see that such must be the primal forms of the unknowable and nameless One, whom we, in the more manifest form speak of as GOD. He is the Absolute. But how define the Absolute? Even as we define it, it slips from our grasp, for it ceases when defined to be the Absolute. Shall we then say that the Negative, the limitless, the Absolute are, logically speaking, absurd, since they are ideas which our reason cannot define? No; for could we define them, we should make them, so to speak, contained by our reason, and therefore not superior to it; for a subject to be capable of definition it is requisite that certain limits should be assignable to it. How then can we limit the Illimitable?
31. The first principle and axiom of the Qabalah is the name of the Deity, translated in our version of the Bible, "I am that I am," AHIH AShR AHIH, Eheieh Asher Eheieh. A better translation is, "Existence is existence," or "I am He who is."
32. Eliphaz Levi Zahed, that great philosopher and Qabalist of the present century, says in his "Histoire de la Magie" (bk. i. ch. 7): "The Qabalists have a horror of everything that resembles idolatry; they, however, ascribe the human form to God, but it is a purely hieroglyphical figure. They consider God as the intelligent, living, and loving Infinite One. He is for them neither the collection of other beings, nor the abstraction of existence, nor a philosophically definable being. He is in all, distinct from all, and greater than all. His very name is ineffable; and yet this name only expresses the human ideal of His Divinity. What God is in Himself it is not given to man to know. God is the absolute of faith; existence is the absolute of reason, existence exists by itself, and because it exists. The reason of the existence of existence is existence itself. We may ask, 'Why does any particular thing exist?' that is, 'Why does such or such a thing exist?' But we cannot ask, without its being absurd to do so, Why does existence exist?' For this would be to suppose existence prior to existence." Again, the same author says (ibid. bk. iii. ch. 2): "To say, 'I will believe when the truth of the dogma shall be scientifically proved to me,' is the same as to say, 'I will believe when I have nothing more to believe, and when the dogma shall be destroyed as dogma by becoming a scientific theorem.' That is to say, in other words: 'I will only admit the Infinite when it shall have been explained, determined, circumscribed, and defined for my benefit; in one word, when it has become finite. I will then believe in the Infinite when I am sure that the Infinite does not exist. I will believe in the vastness of the ocean when I shall have seen it put into bottles.' But when a thing has been clearly proved and made comprehensible to you, you will no longer believe it--you will know it."
33. In the "Bhagavadgîtâ," ch. ix., it is said: "I am Immortality and also death; and I, O Arguna! am that which is and that which is not."1 And again (ch. ix.): "And, O descendant of Bharata! see wonders in numbers, unseen before. Within my body, O Gudâkesa! see to-day the whole universe, including everything movable and immovable, all in one." And again (ibid.) Arguna said: "O Infinite Lord of the Gods! O Thou who pervadest the universe! Thou art the Indestructible, that which is, that which is not, and what is beyond them. Thou art the Primal God, the Ancient One; Thou are the highest support of this universe. By Thee is this universe pervaded, O Thou of the infinite forms . . . . Thou art of infinite power, of unmeasured glory; Thou pervadest all, and therefore Thou art all!"
34. The idea of negative existence can then exist as an idea, but it will not bear definition, since the idea of definition is utterly incompatible with its nature. "But," some of my readers will perhaps say, "your term negative existence is surely a misnomer; the state you describe would be better expressed by the title of negative subsistence." Not so, I answer; for negative subsistence can never be anything but negative subsistence; it cannot vary, it cannot develop; for negative subsistence is literally and truly no thing. Therefore, negative subsistence cannot be at all; it never has existed, it never does exist, it never will exist. But negative existence bears hidden in itself, positive life; for in the limitless depths of the abyss of its negativity lies hidden the power of standing forth from itself, the power of projecting the scintilla of the thought unto the utter, the power of re-involving the syntagma into the inner. Thus shrouded and veiled is the absorbed intensity in the centreless whirl of the vastness of expansion. Therefore have I employed the term "Ex-sto," rather than "Sub-sto."
35. But between two ideas so different as those of negative and positive existence a certain nexus, or connecting-link, is required, and hence we arrive at the form which is called potential existence, which while more nearly approaching positive existence, will still scarcely admit of clear definition. It is existence in its possible form. For example, in a seed, the tree which may spring from it is hidden; it is in a condition of potential existence; is there; but it will not admit of definition. How much less, then, will those seeds which that tree in its turn may yield. But these latter are in a condition which, while it is somewhat analogous to potential existence, is in hardly so advanced a stage; that is, they are negatively existent.
36. But, on the other hand, positive existence is always capable of definition; it is dynamic; it has certain evident powers, and it is therefore the antithesis of negative existence, and still more so of negative subsistence. It is the tree, no longer hidden in the seed, but developed into the outer. But positive existence has a beginning and an end, and it therefore requires another form from which to depend, for without this other concealed negative ideal behind it, it is unstable and unsatisfactory.
37. Thus, then, have I faintly and with all reverence endeavoured to shadow forth to the minds of my readers the idea of the Illimitable One. And before that idea, and of that idea, I can only say, in the words of an ancient oracle: "In Him is an illimitable abyss of glory, and from it there goeth forth one little spark which maketh all the glory of the sun, and of the moon, and of the stars. Mortal! behold how little I know of God; seek not to know more of Him, for this is far beyond thy comprehension, however wise thou art; as for us, who are His ministers, how small a part are we of Him! "
apparently quoting from Proclus: "That the heaven is in the earth, but after an earthly manner; and that the earth is in the heaven, but after a heavenly manner." But inasmuch as negative existence is a subject incapable of definition, as I have before shown, it is rather considered by the Qabalists as depending back from the number of unity than as a separate consideration therefrom; wherefore they frequently apply the same terms and epithets indiscriminately to either. Such epithets are "The Concealed of the Concealed," "The Ancient of the Ancient Ones," the "Most Holy Ancient One," &c.
39, I must now explain the real meaning of the terms Sephira and Sephiroth. The first is singular, the second is plural. The best rendering of the word is "numerical emanation." There are ten Sephiroth, which are the most abstract forms of the ten numbers of the decimal scale--i.e., the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Therefore, as in the higher mathematics we reason of numbers in their abstract sense, so in the Qabalah we reason of the Deity by the abstract forms of the numbers; in other words, by the SPIRVTh, Sephiroth. It was from this ancient Oriental theory that Pythagoras derived his numerical symbolic ideas.
40. Among these Sephiroth, jointly and severally, we find the development of the persons and attributes of God. Of these some are male and some female. Now, for some reason or other best known to themselves, the translators of the Bible have carefully crowded out of existence and smothered up every reference to the fact that the Deity is both masculine and feminine. They have translated a feminine plural by a masculine singular in the case of the word Elohim. They have, however, left an inadvertent admission of their knowledge that it was plural in Gen. iv. 26; "And Elohim said: Let Us make man." Again (V. 27), how could Adam be made in the image of the Elohim, male and female, unless the Elohim were male and female also? The word Elohim is a plural formed from the feminine singular ALH, Eloh, by adding IM to the word. But inasmuch as IM is usually the termination of the masculine plural, and is here added to a feminine noun, it gives to the word Elohim the sense of a female potency united to a masculine idea, and thereby capable of producing an offspring. Now, we hear much of the Father and the Son, but we hear nothing of the Mother in the ordinary religions of the day. But in the Qabalah we find that the Ancient of Days conforms Himself simultaneously into the Father and the Mother, and thus begets the Son. Now, this Mother is Elohim. Again, we are usually told that the Holy Spirit is masculine. But the word RVCh, Ruach, Spirit, is feminine, as appears from the following passage of the Sepher Yetzirah: "AChTh RVCh ALHIM ChIIM, Achath (feminine, not Achad, masculine) Ruach Elohim Chiim: "One is She the Spirit of the Elohim of Life."
41. Now, we find that before the Deity conformed Himself thus--i.e., as male and female--that the worlds of the universe could not subsist, or, in the words of Genesis, "The earth was formless and void." These prior worlds are considered to be symbolized by the "kings who reigned in Edom before there reigned a king in Israel," and they are therefore spoken of in the Qabalah as the "Edomite kings." This will be found fully explained in various parts of this work.
42. We now come to the consideration of the first Sephira, or the Number One, the Monad of Pythagoras. In this number are the other nine hidden. It is indivisible, it is also incapable of multiplication; divide 1 by itself and it still remains 1, multiply 1 by itself and it is still 1 and unchanged. Thus it is a fitting representative of the great unchangeable Father of all. Now this number of unity has a twofold nature, and thus forms, as it were, the link between the negative and the positive. In its unchangeable one-ness it is scarcely a number; but in its property of capability of addition it may be called the first number of a numerical series. Now, the zero, 0, is incapable even of addition, just as also is negative existence. How, then, if 1 can neither be multiplied nor divided, is another 1 to be obtained to add to it; in other words, how is the number 2 to be found? By reflection of itself. For though 0 be incapable of definition, 1 is definable. And the effect of a definition is to form an Eidolon, duplicate, or image, of the thing defined. Thus, then, we obtain a duad composed of 1 and its reflection. Now also we have the commencement of a vibration established, for the number 1 vibrates alternately from changelessness to definition, and back to changelessness again. Thus, then, is it the father of all numbers, and a fitting type of the Father of all things.
The name of the first Sephira is KThR, Kether, the Crown.
The Divine Name attributed to it is the Name of the Father given in Exod. iii. 4: AHIH, Eheieh, I am. It signifies Existence.
Among the Epithets applied to it, as containing in itself the idea of negative existence depending back from it, are:
TMIRA DTMIRIN, Temira De-Temirin, the Concealed of the Concealed.
OThIQA DOThIQIN, Authiqa De-Authiqin, the Ancient of the Ancient Ones.
OThIQA QDIShA, Authiqa Qadisha, the Most Holy Ancient One.
OThIQA, Authiqa, the Ancient One.
OThIQ IVMIN, Authiq Iomin, the Ancient of Days.
It is also called:
NQDH RAShVNH, Nequdah Rashunah, the Primordial Point.
NQDH PShVTh, Nequdah Peshutah, the Smooth Point.
RIShA HVVRH, Risha Havurah, the White Head.
RVM MOLH, Rom Meolah, the Inscrutable Height. Besides all these there is another very important name applied to this Sephira as representing the great Father of all things. It is ARIK ANPIN, Arikh Anpin, the Vast Countenance, or Macroprosopus. Of Him it is said that He is partly concealed (in the sense of His connection with the negative existence) and partly manifest (as a positive Sephira). Hence the symbolism of the Vast Countenance is that of a profile wherein one side only of the countenance is seen; or, as it is said in the Qabalah, "in Him all is right side." I shall refer to this title again.
The whole ten Sephiroth represent the Heavenly Man, or Primordial Being, ADM OILAH, Adam Auilah.
Under this Sephira are classed the angelic order of ChIVTh HQDSh, Chioth Ha-Qadesh, holy living-creatures, the kerubim or sphinxes of Ezekiel's vision and of the Apocalypse of John. These are represented in the Zodiac by the four signs, Taurus, Leo, Scorpio, and Aquarius--the Bull, Lion, Eagle, and Man: Scorpio, as a good emblem, being symbolized by the eagle, as an evil emblem by the scorpion, and as of a mixed nature by the snake.
This first Sephira contained the other nine, and produced them in succession, thus:--
43. The number 2, or the Duad. The name of the second Sephira is ChKMH, Chokmah, Wisdom, a masculine active potency reflected from Kether, as I have before explained. This Sephira is the active and evident Father, to whom the Mother is united, who is the number 3. This second Sephira is represented by the Divine Names, IH, Yah, and IHVH; and among the angelic hosts by AVPNIM, Auphanim, the Wheels (Ezek. i.). It is also called AB, Ab, the Father.
44. The third Sephira, or Triad, is a feminine passive potency, called BINH, Binah, the Understanding, who is co-equal with Chokmah. For Chokmah, the number 2, is like two straight lines which can never enclose a space, and therefore it is powerless till the number 3 forms the triangle. Thus this Sephira completes and makes evident the supernal Trinity. It is also called AMA, Ama, Mother, and AIMA, Aima
