Aphorism. Of the Truth of the Sciences
Preface
UNDER the auspices of the "Universite Libre des Hautes Etudes" of Paris, a Branch of which has recently been established in America, we publish the first volume of a series of classical works whose study constitutes the foundation of the teaching of the “Faculte des Sciences Hermetiques.It is not without reason that we have chosen Pernety to inaugurate this series. Of the three thousand volumes composing the bibliography of ALCHEMY, those of Dom Antoine-Joseph Pernety are the only ones in which the theories of the Artificers are exposed with method: he is the first and only writer who has endeavored to present a short, concise and complete system of the Magnum Opus.Those valiant defenders of the mystic Faith, to whom we are indebted for the present universal awakening of Idealism, have not failed to recognize the important role which Hermetic Philosophers have played in the preservation and transmission of the sacred tradition regarding the rapports existing between God, Man and Nature. Unhappily they have found themselves face to face with the Sphinx, unable to solve the enigma; they have lost their way in the inextricable labyrinth of apparently contradictory symbols and signs, and in the darkness of their ignorance, they have been incapable of distinguishing Truth from the rubbish that surrounds it, or of separating pure physical facts from mere mystical speculations. Having a vague intuition that Hermetism was not solely concerned with the transmutation of metals, but also with the spiritual emancipation of Man, they have profited by a few analogies which presented themselves, and have created a mystical Alchemy in which the inner man is the exclusive subject. But while such interpretation may, in many instances, be applied to alchemical symbolism, and while we may believe that in this we follow the traditions of the Rosicrucians (who founded a system in which Alchemy and Kabbalah were indissolubly blended), modern commentators, borrowing the jargon of the Alchemists - who are never more obscure than when they appear to express themselves plainly- have drawn analogies which a mere acquaintance with the fundamental principles of Physical Alchemy would suffice to cause to be rejected as utterly devoid of appropriateness.[1]
Rosicrucians were indeed mystics, but their studies were above all of a purely physical and experimental character; their association of mysticism and chemistry was founded upon analogies the truth of which could be demonstrated in the laboratory and duly verified by the physical senses. No metaphysical proposition was accepted by them which could not be fully confirmed by scientific demonstrations, according to the practice of Roger Bacon, the father of the experimental method.
Alchemists acquired the knowledge of Divine operations by the study of human arts and the observation of natural phenomena. Hermetism begins with the study of the operations of Nature, and ends with the knowledge of the Divine Principle. None, however, must hope to behold the secret Sun of this Royal Art while he remains in darkness regarding the fundamental principles of physical Hermetism, or Alchemy.
The Spagyric Art is a dead science; it has long since uttered its last word; nothing remains but a few tracts, fragments of its outer vestment, and a multitude of worthless lucubrations by pseudo-adepts; the secret is lost, for future generations to recover; but, in order to be freed from the trouble of ransacking dusty old books and manuscripts, and of reconstituting, word after word, this science in its integrity by patient research; in order to avoid the tedious work of deciphering the hieroglyphic pentacles and of restoring the secret meaning of the mutilated tracts of the Masters which have reached us through the centuries, one is not permitted to invent a new Hermetism, to enlarge it, or to attribute to it a signification which, most probably, it never had. Hermetism is what it is, and we must accept its teachings for what they are worth, without trying to reconcile them with the assertions of modern science, or to give to them any signification that may suggest itself.
Hermetic Philosophy has long since been rejected by the School, and scientific means of investigation are here of no practical use, even XIXth century chemistry offers no clue; for the ideas of the Spagyric Art are absolutely the antithesis of those of official chemistry. The student must make use of other means; but let him guard against preconceived ideas, against his ardent desire to verify, in the obscure symbols of medieval Artists, his own suppositions. Let him remember that Symbols prove everything, and that the signs chosen to defend the affirmative of any proposition, may also be used successfully in demonstrating the negative of the same proposition; symbols are the expression of the Absolute which is neither positive or negative, but positive and negative, according to the point of view from which one judges.
Thus, in order to distinguish the right way, “which leads to the Elysian Fields,” from that “which borders Tartarus,” the assistance of a trusty guide is indispensable. Unfortunately such guides are few, and if, perchance, one is found, the student, ninety-nine times in a hundred, far from being willing to follow in silence, prefers to choose his own way. If the student depends upon his supposed willingness to obey his Initiator, let him shut this book and renounce his plan of lifting the veil which covers the arcana of Hermetic Philosophy, for unprepared as he surely is, he will either fall a victim to impostors, or fail to acknowledge with gratitude the heavenly gift of a Mentor.
There is but one method whereby one may succeed without a Master in reconstituting, in its completeness, the Lost Science, and this method which we take pleasure in revealing, as plainly as possible, is infallible in its results. It constitutes the most potent operation of the Ars Magica: the EVOCATION. We shall describe it under its general aspect, referring the Reader to the special works on Transcendental Magic for full details:
Evocation consists in causing departed spirits to manifest their presence before the Conjuror. But as spirits can only appear immaterially - and as influences rather than individuals - it goes without saying that these beings cannot manifest themselves in tangible form, (susceptible of being photographed), unless appeal is made to our own semi-material, semi-spiritual principle, to our Astral Body; this, however, constitutes the Great Operation to which it is neither necessary nor advisable to have recourse, so much the more that the Evocation, such as we recommend, differs from the Great Operation in that it is of longer duration, practically permanent; whilst the latter is dependent upon the powers of the Conjuror; moreover the Great Operation is possible only for the Initiate in Theurgy, whilst the simple Evocation, as here described, can be performed with success by any one who possesses the pass-words of the First Degree of Initiation: PATIENCE and WILL-POWER.
The Evocation, or Operation of the lesser Mysteries, consists in recreating the atmosphere in which the departed lived while on earth. It is therefore important that the choice of an invisible Master be made intelligently from the long list of Hermetic Philosophers. The Operator must know the biography of that Master and obtain a correct impression of his exterior appearance; he must know the history of the time in which that Master lived, the geography of the country in which he resided, the topography of his city, the plan of his house, the disposition of his laboratory. Helping himself by whatever informations books, monuments or tradition can furnish, the Neophyte will assemble and classify every detail concerning the home-life, customs, daily vocations, etc., so as to reconstitute, in the imaginative world, the life of the selected Guide. Place him amidst his disciples, either in his laboratory or at the amphitheatre of the school where he taught; gather all the works most probably known and studied by him, read and re-read them; write from memory the very works of that Master, especially his most obscure passages, for the soul of a writer can always be found in his words, ready to convey the true interpretation to the one eager to discover it. Collect objects contemporaneous to that Master, especially books, instruments and works of art. All this constitutes the restoration of the most material part of the atmosphere that will serve as the vehicle for the true magnetic force which shall be the bond uniting the soul, or influence, of the invisible Master to that of the Conjuror. This true magnetic fluid must be established between the mind of the Operator, which now is active, and that of the Master, which is passive; when the rapports are at last established, the mind of the Guide becomes the positive pole and that of the initiate the negative pole of this intellectual battery. To generate the magnetic fluid the student must place his intellect on the same level as that of his chosen Preceptor: he must learn to know and to ignore that which the Master knew and ignored; he must believe that which the invisible believed, when on earth, whether modern science accepts or rejects these beliefs; he must think over the same thoughts of the Master, speak his own words, use the same expressions, recite the same prayers, practice the same religion, acquire the same habits, perform the same acts of virtue, live the same life; in a word, he must place the heart and the mind in a thoroughly sympathetic condition, in a perfect unison with the heart and mind of his Mentor, so as to attract the latter into his own atmosphere again, of which he will become the intellectual center, as formerly; he will incarnate himself in his disciple whose mind, now a plastic clay, will acquire in its highest degree the faculty of receptivity, and will become susceptible of receiving the least impressions from the outer world. The Influence of the being thus evoked, thus brought back into the world by an irresistible magnetism, will then unite with the Operator and continue, through the latter's instrumentality, the work which death interrupted. It is thus that Hans de Bulow, who lived among the souvenirs, the works and the relics of Beethoven, consecrating his entire life to the study of this Master, succeeded in giving that traditional expression established by the composer for the interpretation of his Sonatas and Symphonies.
In order to really possess a Master and perform his works as the author himself imagined them, we must prepare within ourselves a temple fit to receive him; we must place all our mental faculties under his control, we must become a docile instrument into his hands. But, by the law of reaction, this complete submission on our part soon becomes the manifestation of our absolute independence, of our absolute intellectual freedom.
This is the course which we recommend to all our students, and it is to instruct them concerning the scientific opinions of the Hermetic Philosophers that we publish this work of dom Pernety. The opinions herein expressed may not be in accordance with the teaching of scholastic knowledge, but we do not present this work as a substitute for classical Physics and Chemistry. The theories exposed by Pernety were those of the Alchemists! For the mystic, for the seeker of the Universal Panacea, or Philosopher's Stone, the science described in this Treatise is all that is required; nay, it is the sole one to be accepted, regardless of its differences from the results of modern investigation which, for our purpose, are utterly worthless. Just as it is indispensable for the pupils of Edison and Tesla to base their studies upon the latest works on Natural Philosophy, however erroneous the science of tomorrow may prove them to be; it is indispensable, for those who do not recognize the impossibility of transmuting metals, to base their investigations upon the science which was sufficient to Arnaud de Villeneuve, Nicolas Flamel and Paracelsus.”
The present work which we have entitled TREATISE ON THE GREAT ART is composed of the introductory remarks preceding the principal works on Alchemy of the savant dom Pernety, especially his “Fables Egyptiennes et Grecques devoilees et reduites au meme principe ”, (a Paris, chez Bauche, 2 volumes in I2, I758). This work is almost the sole source from which modern expounders of Alchemy have derived their informations, forgetting, of course, to give due credit to this author, excluding his works from the bibliographical lists terminating their compilations and even going so far, in some instances, as to mutilate his name, when compelled to quote extensively from his works. The publication of this TREATISE constitutes as much a work of justice and restitution to the learned French monk, as an effort to contribute to the renaissance of a Science containing within itself the germs of the most important and unexpected discoveries and offering a sure guide in the maze of obscure symbols of this most obscure of all Occult Sciences.
Antoine-Joseph Pernety was born in Roanne, France, in 1716; and died at Valence (Dauphine), in 1801. At an early age he joined the Benedictine Congregation of Saint-Maur and there devoted his life to these patient studies for which Benedictine monks are justly famous; he published numerous works on theology and fine arts, geography and mythology, philosophy and mathematics, but he became celebrated for his researches in the realm of the hidden Sciences. His explorations into forgotten lore led him to the creation of the “Academie d’Avignon” a sect of Illuminati whose influence in Freemasonry has long been felt: the most famous, if not the most important, degree introduced in the Masonic nomenclature by Pernety is the Twenty-eighth of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, known as Knight of the Sun, or Prince Adept; and a considerable part of his rite is still preserved in other masonic systems, such as the Martinist Order.
The work which we present to the public is the result of a comparative study of the writings of the Spagyric Philosophers of all times, schools and nationalities, and not merely a summary of the author's personal ideas on the subject; it is a monument of patient research, representing over a quarter of a century of investigation. The writer has carefully analyzed the classical compositions of the Masters, preserving with religious care the dogmas upon which they all agree, and setting aside their contradictions, basing himself upon the axiom that Truth, when once discovered, is the same for all, while error only offers opportunity for discussion. Pernety, following the example of Trevisan, has compared with an extreme attention the Greek, Alexandrian, Arab, French, German, Dutch, English, Kabbalistic, Rosicrucian and Islamic schools of Hermetism, presenting the synthesis of their doctrines in the lucid manner so characteristic of the French savant, by nature the mortal enemy of all that which is obscure and incomprehensible.
The present work is divided into three parts: an Introductory Discourse, an Expose of Natural Philosophy according to Hermetists, without which all attempt to understand the Art of Transmutations is impossible, and the Theory and Practice of the Magisterium, or Royal Art, briefly, but completely presented.
The editor of this translation has preserved in the text the notes of Pernety himself, and has introduced, as foot-notes, annotations borrowed from other works of Pernety, from Albert Poisson, the Champollion of Alchemy, Dr. Papus, Jollivet-Castelot, de Guai'ta, etc., in the very few places where the text seemed to allow a complementary explanation. These annotations are always followed by the name of the author to whom the translator is indebted.
The work contains also a table of Alchemical Characters which are so frequently met with in spagyric works and a short Dictionary of Hermetic Symbols, compiled by the lamented Albert Poisson for his “Theories et Symboles des Alchimistes,” which will afford great help in the reading of alchemic pentacles. E. B.
[2][3]
Preliminary Discourse
DO not expect to have the approbation of those vast, sublime and
penetrating minds which embrace all, which know all without having
learned anything, which dispute concerning everything, which decide
about everything without knowledge of the cause. It is not to such
people that one gives lessons; to them belongs the name of sage,
rather than to Democritus, to Plato, to Pythagoras and to the other
Greeks who were in Egypt to breathe the hermetic air, and who drew
from it the folly of which we will treat. It is not for sages of
this character that this work is made: this contagious air of Egypt
is diffused throughout it; they would run the risk of being
infected by it; as the Gebers, Synesiuses, Moriens, Arnaud de
Villeneuves, Raymond Lullys, and so many others, simple enough to
believe in this Philosophy. Following the example of Diodorus of
Sicily, of Pliny, of Suidas and many other Ancients, they would,
perhaps, become credulous enough to regard this Science as real,
and to speak of it as such. They might become ridiculous as
Borrichius, Kunckel, Beccher, Stahl, mad enough to make treatises
which prove it, and to undertake its defense.
But if the example of these celebrated men makes any impression
upon minds free from bias and void of prejudice in this respect,
there will be found, doubtless, men sufficiently sensible to wish
to be instructed, as they, in a Science little known, in truth, but
cultivated in all times. Proud ignorance and fatuity alone are
capable of despising and condemning without knowledge. Not a
hundred years ago, simply the name of Algebra kept one from the
study of that science and was revolting to the so-called good sense
of the savants! that of Geometry is capable of giving hysterics to
the scientific “Petits-Maitres” of to-day. Little by little one has
become familiar with them. The barbarous terms with which they
bristle, no longer cause fear; one studies them, one cultivates
them, honor has succeeded the repugnance, 1 might say the scorn,
with which they were regarded.
Hermetic Philosophy is still in disgrace and consequently in
discredit. It is full of enigmas, and probably will not be freed,
for a long time, of those allegorical and barbarous terms whose
true meaning so few understand. The study of it is so much the more
difficult as perpetual metaphors put on the wrong track those who
imagine that they understand the authors who treat of it, at the
first reading. Moreover these authors warn us that such a Science
as this cannot be treated as clearly as the others because of the
fatal consequences to civil life which might result from it. They
make of it a mystery, and a mystery which they study rather to
deepen than to develop. So they continually recommend the reader
not to take them literally, to study the laws and processes of
Nature, to compare the operations of which they speak with hers; to
admit only those which will be found conformable to hers. . . .
Ambition and the love of riches are the only motives which
influence almost all of those who work to instruct themselves
concerning the processes of this Science; it presents to them
mountains of gold in perspective, and long life to enjoy them. What
riches for hearts attached to the blessings of this world! They
hasten, they run to reach this aim, and as they fear not to arrive
there soon enough they take the first way which appears to lead to
it most quickly, without taking the trouble to instruct themselves
concerning the true way. They walk, they advance, they believe
themselves at the end; but as they have walked blindly, they find
there a precipice in which they fall. They then think to conceal
the shame of their fall by saying that this pretended aim is only a
shadow, which they cannot embrace; they treat their guides as
perfidious ones; they finally arrive at the point of denying even
the possibility of an effect, because they are ignorant of its
causes. What! because the greatest naturalists have lost their
night-studies and their works in trying to discover what processes
Nature employs to form and to organize the fxtus in the maternal
womb, to make a plant germinate and grow, to form the metals in the
earth, could we with good grace deny these facts? Would we regard
as sensible a man whose ignorance would be the foundation of his
negations? One would not even deign to take the trouble to make the
least proof to convince him.
But wise people, enlightened and skilful Artists have studied all
their lives, and have worked continually to arrive at it, they have
given up their lives for it: what must we conclude? That the thing
is not real? No: from about the year 550, from the foundation of
Rome up to our day, the most skilful people worked to imitate the
famous burning mirror of Archimedes, with which he burned the
vessels of the Romans in the port of Syracuse; they have not been
able to succeed; they treated the fact as an allegory; it was a
fable; and even the making of the mirror was impossible. M. de
Buffon thinks of taking a simpler way than those who have preceded
him, he arrives at the end; we are surprised, we finally avow that
the thing is possible.
Let us conclude then, with more reason, that these Savants, these
skilful Artists made their own knowledge of too much importance.
Instead of following the straight, simple and smooth ways of
Nature, they have attributed to her subtleties which she never
possessed. Hermetic Art is, say the Philosophers, a mystery hidden
to those who rely too much on their own knowledge: it is a gift of
God who regards favorably those who are humble, who fear Him, who
place all their confidence in Him, and who, as Solomon, demand from
Him with eagerness and perseverance that wisdom, who holds in her
right hand length of days, and in her left hand riches,
(Proverbs ch. iii. v. 16); that wisdom which Philosophers
prefer to all honors, to all the kingdoms of the world, because she
is the Tree of Life to those who lay hold upon her,
(Proverbs, ch. iii. v. 18).
All Hermetic Philosophers say that, although the Ars Magna
is a natural thing, both in its essence and in its operations, yet
things so surprising take place in it, that they elevate the spirit
of man toward the Author of his being, that they manifest His
wisdom and glory, that they are much above human intelligence, and
that only those comprehend them, whose eyes God deigns to open.
This is sufficiently proved by the blunders and lack of success of
all those artists, famous in vulgar chemistry, who in spite of all
their skill in manipulations, in spite of all their pretended
knowledge of Nature, have lost their time, their money, and often
their health, in the search of this inestimable treasure.
How many Becchers, Homberts, Boerhaves, Geofroys and other skilled
chemists, have by their indefatigable labors forced Nature to
reveal to them some of her secrets? In spite of all their
carefulness in watching her processes, in analysing her
productions, to take her in the act, they have almost always
failed, because they have been the tyrants of this Nature and not
her true imitators. Sufficiently enlightened in common chemistry,
and instructed in its processes, but blind in regard to Hermetic
Chemistry, and carried away by custom, they have erected
sublimatory, calcinatory, distillatory furnaces, (Novum Lumen
Chemicum; Tract. I). They have employed an infinite number of
vases and crucibles, unknown to simple Nature; they have summoned
to their aid the fratricide of natural Fire; how could they have
succeeded with such violent processes? They have absolutely
departed from those who follow the Hermetic Philosophers, if we are
to believe President d'Espagnet, (Hermetic Arcanum, Can.
6.):
“The Alchemists who have given their minds to their well-nigh
innumerable Sublimations, Distillations, Solutions, Congelations,
to manifold extraction of Spirits and Tinctures, and other
operations more subtle than profitable, and so have distracted
themselves by a variety of errors, as so many tormentors, will
never be inclined again by their own genius to the plain way of
Nature and light of Truth; from whence their industrious subtlety
hath twined them, and by twinings and turnings, as by the Lybian
Quicksands, hath drowned their entangled wits; the only hope of
safety for them remaineth in finding out a faithful guide and
master, who may make the Sun clear and conspicuous unto them, and
free their eyes from darkness.”
“A studious Tyro of a quick wit, constant mind, inflamed with the
study of Philosophy, very skilful in natural Philosophy, of a pure
heart, complete in manners, mightily devoted to God, though
ignorant of practical Chemistry, may with confidence enter into the
highway of Nature and peruse the books of the best
Philosophers.”
“If Hermes, the true father of Philosophy”, so says the Cosmopolite
(Novum lumen chemicum, Tract I), if the subtle Geber, the
profound Raymond Lully, and other justly celebrated chemists could
return to the earth, our alchemists would not only refuse to regard
them as their masters, but would think to confer a favor upon them
by owning them as their disciples. It is true that they would not
know how to make all those distillations, circulations,
calcinations, sublimations, in a word all those innumerable
operations which chemists have imagined, because they have wrongly
understood the books of the Philosophers.”
All real Adepts speak with one voice and if they speak truly, one
may, without taking so much trouble, without employing so many
vases, without consuming so much charcoal, without ruining one's
purse and one's health, one may, I repeat, work in concert with
Nature, who, being aided, will lend herself to the desires of the
Artist and will freely open to him her treasures. He will learn
from her, not how to destroy the bodies which she produces, but how
and from what, she composes them, and into what they resolve. She
will show him that matter, that chaos from which the Supreme Being
has formed the Universe. They will see Nature, as in a mirror, and
her reflection will manifest to them the infinite wisdom of the
Creator, who directs and guides her, in all her operations, by a
simple and unique way which constitutes all the mystery of the
Magnum Opus.
But that thing called Philosopher's Stone, Universal Medicine,
Golden Panacea, does it exist in reality as well as in speculation?
Why, through the ages, have so many persons, whom Heaven seemed to
have favored with knowledge superior to that of most men, sought it
in vain? But, on the other hand, so many trustworthy historians, so
many wise men have attested its existence, and have left in
enigmatical writings and allegories the method of making it which
can scarcely be doubted, when one knows how to adapt these writings
to the principles of Nature.
The Hermetic Philosophers differ absolutely from the common
Philosophers or Physicists. The latter have no certain system. They
invent new ones daily, and the last seems to be conceived only to
contradict, and destroy those that have preceded it. Briefly, if
one is erected and established, it is upon the ruins of its
predecessor, and it will exist only until a new one overthrows it
and takes its place.
On the contrary, Hermetic Philosophers are all agreed; no one of
them contradicts the principles of the other. He who wrote thirty
years ago speaks as he who lived two thousand years ago. One thing
which appears a little singular is that they never weary of
repeating that axiom which the church (Vincent de Lerin.
Commonit.) adopts as the most infallible mark of the truth in
that which it presents to us for belief: Quod ubique quod ab
omnibus, et quod semper creditum est, id firmissime credendum
puta. Observe, say they, read, meditate on the things which
have been taught in all times, and by all Philosophers; the truth
is enclosed in the passages where they all agree.
What an indication, indeed, when men who have lived in ages so
distant, and in countries so different in language, and, I dare to
say it, in their manner of thinking, all agree on one point. What!
would Egyptians, Arabs, Chinese, Greeks, Jews, Italians, Germans,
Americans, French, English, etc., have agreed, without knowing each
other, without understanding each other, and without having
communicated their ideas, in writing and in speaking about a
chimera, an imaginary entity? without taking into account all the
works on this subject, which were burned by the orders of
Diocletian, who
thought thus to deprive the Egyptians of the means of making gold,
and to render them unable to sustain war against him, there still
remain to us, in all the languages of the world, works sufficiently
numerous to justify to the incredulous what I have just advanced.
The library of the King alone preserves a great number of ancient
and modern manuscripts, in all languages, relating to this
science.
Michel Maier said on this subject, in an Epigram, found at the
beginning of his Treatise, entitled Symbola aurew
mensw:Unum opus en priscis hwc usque ad tempora seclisConsona diffusis gentibus ora dedit.
Let one read Hermes, Egyptian; Abraham, Isaac de Moiros, Jews,
quoted by Avicenna; Democritus, Orpheus, Aristotle, (De
Secretis Secretorum), Olympiodoros, HeIiodorus (De rebus
chemicis ad Theodosium Imperatorem), Etienne, (De magna et
sacra scientia, ad Heraclium Cwsarem) and other Greeks;
Synesius, Theophilus, Abugazal, etc., Africans; Avicenna, (De
re recta. Tractatulus Chemicus. Tractatus ad Assem Philosophum. De
anima artis), Rhasis, Geber, Artephius, Alphidius, Hamuel,
surnamed the Elder, Rosinus, Arabs; Albertus Magnus,
(De Alchymia, Concordantia Philosophorum; De Compositione
Compositi, etc.), Bernard Trevisan, Basil Valentin, Germans;
Alain (Liber Chemicw), Isaac, father and son, Pontanus,
Flemish or Dutch; Arnaud de Villeneuve, Nicolas Flamel, Denis
Zachaire, Christophe Parisien, Gui de Montanor, d'Espagnet, French;
Morien, Pierre Bon de Ferrare, the anonymous author of
the"Marriage of the Sun and the Moon, ” Italians; Raymond
Lully, Spanish; Roger Bacon, (Speculum Alchemic),
Hortulain, Jean Dastin, Richard, George Ripley, Thomas Norton,
Philalethes and the Cosmopolite, English or Scotch. Finally, many
anonymous authors, (Turba Philosophorum, Seu Codex veritatis,
Clangor Buccinw, Scala Philosophorum, Aurora consurgens, Ludus
puerorum, Thesaurus Philosophic, etc.), of all countries and
of different ages: there will not be found among them one whose
principles are different from those of the others. Does not this
conformity of ideas and principles form, at least a presumption in
favor of the truth and reality of what they teach? If all the
ancient fables of Homer, of Orpheus, and of the Egyptians, are only
allegories of this Art, as I claim to prove in this work, by the
ground-work and origin of the fables themselves, as well as by
their conformity to the allegories of almost all Philosophers,
could one persuade one's self that this science is only a vague
phantom, which never had any existence among the real productions
of Nature?
But if this science has a real object; if this Art has existed, and
if we must believe the Philosophers, concerning the wonderful
things which they relate of it, why is it so scorned, why so
decried, why so discredited? Because the practice of this Art has
never been clearly taught. All the Authors, ancient and modern, who
treat of it, do so under the veil of Hieroglyphics, Enigmas,
Allegories and Fables; so that those who have wished to study them
have generally taken the wrong course, whence has arisen a kind of
sect, which, through having wrongly understood and explained the
writings of the philosophers, has introduced a new Chemistry, and
has imagined that its system was the only real one. Many persons
have become celebrated in this field. Some skilled in the
principles, others extremely dexterous in practice, especially in
the experience required for the success of certain operations, they
have all united against Hermetic Alchemy; they have written in a
manner more easily comprehended by the multitude; they have proved
their opinions by specious arguments. By making at random, mixtures
of different substances, and by working blindly, without knowing
what the result would be, they have seen monsters arise; and the
same chance which produced them has served as a basis for the
principles then established. The same mixtures, reiterated, the
same work repeated, have given exactly the same result; but they
have not observed that this result was monstrous, and analogous
only to the abnormal productions of Nature, and not to those which
result from her processes, when she confines herself to the classes
peculiar to each kingdom. Always from the union of an ass and a
mare results a monstrous animal called a mule; for nature acts
always in the same manner when the same materials are furnished
her, whether to produce monsters, or to form beings conformable to
their particular species. If mules came to us from some distant
isle, and we knew nothing of their birth, we would certainly be
tempted to believe that these animals form a class, which is
multiplied as the others. We would not suspect that they were
monsters. We are affected, in this same manner, by the results of
almost all chemical operations; we consider abnormal productions as
productions made in the natural order of Nature. So that one might
say of this kind of Chemistry, that it is the science of destroying
methodically the Mixts produced by Nature, in order to form from
them monsters, which have almost the same appearance and properties
as the natural Mixts. Would more be necessary to conciliate the
Public?
Prepossessed by thes [...][4][5]