0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Poesie und Drama
- Sprache: Englisch
Arthur Wing Pinero's "The Second Mrs. Tanqueray" is a poignant exploration of societal conventions and the complexities of modern relationships in Edwardian England. The play revolves around the character of Paula Tanqueray, a woman of questionable past who seeks redemption and acceptance in a rigidly moral society. Pinero's rich, naturalistic dialogue and intricate character development reflect the prevailing themes of morality, reputation, and the struggles of feminine identity. Highlighting the tensions between personal desires and societal obligations, the work resounds with the earnest inquiries typical of the late Victorian and early Edwardian eras. Pinero, a prominent figure in early 20th-century theatre, was influenced by his own experiences in a society marked by stringent moral codes and the rising question of women's autonomy. His intimate understanding of the theatrical landscape, alongside his background as a sought-after actor and playwright, infuses "The Second Mrs. Tanqueray" with a clarity and emotional depth that sheds light on the complexities of human relationships. The play emerged during a period of significant social change, reflecting the anxieties of a society grappling with evolving gender roles. This compelling drama is highly recommended for readers and theatre enthusiasts seeking a critical lens on early modernity's influence on personal and social identity. Pinero's masterful crafting of both dialogue and character will captivate anyone interested in the interplay of societal expectations and individual aspirations, making it an enduring piece worthy of study and performance. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Ähnliche
The Second Mrs. Tanqueray
Table of Contents
Introduction
In The Second Mrs. Tanqueray, Arthur Wing Pinero examines how private longing collides with public judgment in late-Victorian society, revealing a world where the hunger for renewal in marriage, the weight of remembered transgressions, and the vigilant gaze of polite circles intersect to test the possibility of forgiveness, expose the fragility of status, and compel individuals to choose between the security of conformity and the perilous honesty of self-disclosure, as reputations become battlegrounds, affection is measured against inherited standards, and the past, never quite past, exerts a relentless claim on those seeking a future beyond the strict arithmetic of respectability.
First staged in 1893, The Second Mrs. Tanqueray is a late-Victorian problem play set within the drawing rooms and country houses of upper-middle-class England. Pinero’s drama belongs to the era’s movement toward social realism, bringing contemporary moral questions onto the commercial stage with a seriousness more often associated with continental influences. Its setting is recognizably domestic and respectable, yet the atmosphere hums with unease: hospitality doubles as surveillance, and conversation becomes a tribunal. The play’s period context matters—written at a time of tightening and contested social codes—but its focus on how those codes govern intimacy gives it a durable vitality.
The premise is disarmingly simple and immediately fraught. A widower, Aubrey Tanqueray, seeks happiness in a second marriage to Paula, a woman whose past cannot be neatly folded into the expectations of his circle. Their new household aspires to stability and dignity, but the couple soon confronts the delicate politics of acquaintances, the demands of kinship, and the unspoken terms by which acceptance is granted or withdrawn. Without venturing into plot revelations, it is enough to say that Pinero builds tension through social encounters rather than spectacle, producing an experience that is intimate, probing, and increasingly claustrophobic as pressures accumulate.
Pinero’s play turns on themes of reputation, forgiveness, and the double standards that shadow women in particular. It asks whether a life can be rearticulated when others insist on reading it backward, and whether love can thrive without mutual courage in the face of scrutiny. The drama interrogates the ethics of disclosure—what must be told, to whom, and at what cost—while exposing the uneven calculus by which society tallies sin and merit. It is a study in how the past becomes a social currency, how judgment masquerades as prudence, and how the yearning for respectability can distort the very values it claims to enshrine.
Formally, The Second Mrs. Tanqueray balances the craftsmanship of the well-made play with a restrained psychological realism. Pinero’s dialogue is pointed and economical, allowing conflicts to surface through implication, pauses, and carefully placed revelations rather than declamation. The rooms feel inhabited and perilously intimate; entrances and exits carry moral weather. Tone oscillates between brittle wit and sober inquiry, giving the piece a troubling elegance that mirrors its characters’ composure under strain. Readers and audiences encounter a drama that unfolds like a forensic examination of manners, where every polite gesture shades into strategy and every silence threatens to become a verdict.
Upon its 1893 debut, the play was widely discussed for its forthright engagement with social morality, marking a decisive moment in the acceptance of contemporary issues on the English stage. It helped consolidate Pinero’s reputation as a leading dramatist of his generation and demonstrated that serious, topical subjects could command mainstream attention without surrendering theatrical finesse. The Second Mrs. Tanqueray stands as a key example of the period’s problem play, mediating between popular entertainment and moral inquiry. Its critical legacy endures not because it lectures, but because it dramatizes ethical conflict within recognizably lived settings and relationships.
For readers today, the play’s questions remain bracingly current: how far can a community demand disclosure, who gets the benefit of the doubt, and what does it mean to grant a second chance? In an age still preoccupied with public image and the permanence of reputational traces, Pinero’s drama provides a lens for considering empathy against the pressures of conformity. Approached as both a period piece and a living social argument, The Second Mrs. Tanqueray offers a nuanced, unsettled meditation on accountability and grace, inviting its audience to examine the fairness of their own judgments as carefully as those on stage.
Synopsis
The Second Mrs. Tanqueray, a late Victorian drama by Arthur Wing Pinero, follows the repercussions of a respectable widower’s decision to remarry a woman burdened by a troubled past. Aubrey Tanqueray, fastidious yet lonely, seeks renewal and companionship through marriage to Paula, whose earlier life has made her a subject of gossip. Their union begins with the hope that affection and a change of circumstances can secure respectability. The play traces the couple’s attempt to build a household shielded from scrutiny, setting up a test between private loyalty and public judgment, and introducing themes of reputation, forgiveness, and the limits of social tolerance.
The story opens in Aubrey’s London rooms, where he announces his engagement to friends who know the social risks. Cayley Drummle, an old acquaintance, issues cynical warnings about the consequences of defying convention. Aubrey remains firm, confident that marriage and discretion will keep the past at bay. He plans to bring Paula into a quiet life, far from the circles that once knew her. Meanwhile, his daughter, Ellean, is away at school and has been raised with strict ideals. The first act sets expectations and tensions: a hopeful private decision, overshadowed by the possibility of public exposure and familial conflict.
After the wedding, the action shifts to Aubrey’s country house, where Paula assumes the duties of a new wife under close observation. Determined to reform, she strives to manage the household with dignity, while Aubrey acts protectively, asking friends to respect their privacy. Ellean’s return introduces a delicate triangle: father, daughter, and new stepmother. Their initial meetings are constrained and careful, marked by courtesy and unease. Paula tries to present a composed exterior, but she is sensitive to slight and scrutiny. The domestic routines promise stability, yet every social visit and small misunderstanding threatens the fragile peace.
Paula’s efforts to be accepted are tested by visits from neighbors and figures from her earlier life. Mrs Cortelyon observes with a seasoned social eye, noting small lapses and signaling the code Paula must meet. The unexpected appearance of Lady Orreyed and her set hints at associations Paula would rather leave behind. These encounters introduce gossip and revive doubts that Aubrey hoped to bury. Paula attempts to manage her guest list and her tone, but subtle misjudgments expose the gap between her temperament and the precise restraint his circle expects. Each social occasion becomes a measure of her precarious position.
Within the household, Paula and Ellean attempt to define their relationship. Paula seeks warmth and influence, offering guidance in matters of dress, conversation, and conduct. Ellean, formed by piety and convention, responds with politeness but holds to strict standards. Aubrey’s instinctive partiality to his daughter unsettles Paula, who longs for secure footing in the home. Minor frictions gather weight: a word taken amiss, a perceived slight, an overly zealous correction. The play treats these scenes as incremental tests of character and patience, suggesting that domestic harmony depends not only on virtue, but on mutual trust and tact.
A pivotal complication arises when a suitor appears for Ellean. Captain Hugh Ardale presents an honorable exterior and quickly gains Aubrey’s approval. Paula, however, recognizes him from her past, a connection that threatens Ellean’s future and Paula’s standing. Faced with an urgent dilemma, Paula must decide whether to speak plainly and risk exposure, or remain silent and allow a union she believes cannot bring happiness. The scene shifts inward as Paula weighs competing duties: protection of the young woman, fidelity to her husband, and preservation of her own chance at respectability.
Attempting to avert the match without revealing the reason, Paula counsels delay and caution, only deepening the household’s confusion. Aubrey, puzzled by her resistance, presses for explanations she cannot easily provide. Ellean interprets the opposition as unjust and grows more determined. Paula seeks discreet ways to break the attachment, consulting allies and probing for alternatives, while guarding dangerous facts. The strain exposes the fault lines in every relationship: husband and wife, stepmother and stepdaughter, friend and neighbor. With each attempt to act quietly, Paula risks inviting the very curiosity that would make her past impossible to contain.
The network of secrets tightens until the relevant connection becomes known to critical parties. Acknowledgment of the tie between Paula and the suitor alters perceptions throughout the household. Aubrey confronts a conflict between personal loyalty and public duty, mindful of Ellean’s welfare and the family’s name. Ellean must reconcile her ideals with the complexities of adult experience. Paula, increasingly isolated, faces the consequences of both her history and her choices. The atmosphere hardens; sympathy becomes cautious, and decisions turn on what can be forgiven without inviting scandal. The stage is set for an irrevocable outcome.
The final movement resolves the entanglements with grave clarity, showing how reputations, affections, and hopes can be reshaped by a single, unburied past. Without detailing the last moments, the conclusion underscores the play’s central message: the tension between individual renewal and an unforgiving social code. Pinero presents a sequence where each decision carries public weight, and generosity is constrained by fear of disgrace. The Second Mrs. Tanqueray closes with the household transformed, leaving a measured impression of loss and reckoning, and a sober recognition that respectability, once cracked, exacts a lasting cost from everyone involved.
Historical Context
Set in late Victorian England and first staged in 1893, The Second Mrs. Tanqueray inhabits the milieu of upper-middle-class households, London drawing rooms, and country residences in the Home Counties, often imagined as Surrey. It is a contemporary play of manners anchored in the social geography of the West End—clubs, theatres, and fashionable salons—counterposed with the moral surveillance of provincial society. The time is one of stringent Anglican respectability, elaborate codes of visiting and dinner-party etiquette, and an economy of reputation in which marriage, lineage, and male honor regulate inclusion. The domestic sphere is treated as the sovereign arena where public morality is enforced in private.
Victorian debates on prostitution and sexual morality decisively shaped the play’s world. The Contagious Diseases Acts (1864, 1866, 1869) authorized compulsory medical examinations of suspected prostitutes near garrison and naval towns; after a nationwide campaign led by Josephine Butler and the Ladies National Association (from 1869), they were suspended in 1883 and repealed in 1886. The Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885, propelled by W. T. Stead’s Pall Mall Gazette exposé The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon (1885), raised the age of consent to 16 and empowered the National Vigilance Association (1885) and police to suppress brothels. These measures intensified public scrutiny over women’s sexual history while largely absolving male clients in practice. The Whitechapel murders (1888), widely reported amid sensationalist journalism, further fixed the figure of the “fallen woman” at the center of national anxiety, combining fears about urban vice, poverty, and the state’s duty to regulate sexuality. In this climate, reputation functioned as social capital, with marriage serving as both refuge and trial for women whose pasts deviated from prescribed norms. The Second Mrs. Tanqueray directly mirrors this environment: Paula Tanqueray’s attempt to re-enter respectable society through marriage to a well-placed gentleman is thwarted by the very moral machinery emboldened by these laws and campaigns. The play dramatizes how institutions of purity and reform, ostensibly protective, ratified a gendered double standard that weaponized gossip, ostracism, and clubland honor against women while maintaining male networks of discretion and immunity.
Victorian matrimonial and custody law created the legal scaffolding for respectability and scandal in the 1890s. The Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act 1857 transferred divorce from ecclesiastical to civil courts but preserved inequality: a husband needed to prove adultery; a wife had to prove adultery plus cruelty, desertion, or similar aggravation. The Matrimonial Causes Act 1878 enabled magistrates to grant separation in cases of aggravated assault; R v Jackson (1891) curtailed a husband’s right to imprison his wife. The Guardianship of Infants Act 1886 improved mothers’ custody rights. The play reflects these pressures: remarriage, stepfamilies, and the perilous calculus of scandal drive its conflicts.
Women’s economic precarity, even after legal reforms, informs the story’s stakes. The Married Women’s Property Acts of 1870 and 1882 granted wives control over earnings and property, establishing separate legal identity in financial matters. Yet employment options remained narrow: the 1891 census recorded over a million women in domestic service, with many others confined to low-paid textile, retail, or clerical work. Respectable livelihoods for women with compromised reputations were exceedingly scarce. Pinero’s heroine seeks security through a socially advantageous marriage, but the system that recognizes a wife’s property also polices her sexual past; the resulting contradictions make the marriage bond both sanctuary and instrument of discipline.
Class geography and the rituals of gentility are historically specific. The late nineteenth century saw the expansion of London’s commuter belt via railways, enabling upper-middle-class families to maintain country houses within easy reach of the West End. Clubs, dining societies, and weekend house parties consolidated male networks of influence. Such spaces enforced a code of discretion that admitted known transgressions if quietly managed and punished infractions that threatened collective decorum. The play’s country-house settings and drawing-room confrontations reproduce these dynamics: invitations, introductions, and seating plans become mechanisms of social inclusion or banishment, revealing how class ritual sustains moral authority.
Theatre regulation and public morality framed how controversial subjects reached audiences. The Theatres Act 1843 required the Lord Chamberlain’s license, allowing the state to suppress material deemed indecent or politically sensitive. Notably, the 1891 London staging of Ibsen’s Ghosts provoked a storm over its treatment of venereal disease and hypocrisy, highlighting the limits of what could be staged. Against this backdrop, The Second Mrs. Tanqueray premiered at St. James’s Theatre, London, on 27 May 1893 under manager-actor George Alexander, with Mrs. Patrick Campbell as Paula. Licensed yet contentious, it signaled that West End institutions could broach taboo topics while negotiating censorship’s constraints.
Mass-circulation newspapers and headline-grabbing trials sharpened the era’s reputation economy. The Tranby Croft baccarat scandal (1890–1891), entangling the Prince of Wales, exposed elite vice and the fragility of honor under press glare. The Oscar Wilde trials in 1895, following the Marquess of Queensberry’s libel accusation, escalated moral policing and linked private conduct to public ruin. Stamp and paper duty repeals (1855, 1861) had already broadened readership; by the 1890s, the popular press could rapidly construct and destroy reputations. The play’s dread of exposure, whispers, and sudden social extinction translates this media-saturated culture into domestic tragedy, where one disclosure can shatter a household’s standing.
The work operates as a social critique of late Victorian moral governance. It exposes the gendered double standard that forgave masculine lapse while denying female rehabilitation, the complicity of class ritual in enforcing exclusion, and the gap between legal reform and lived justice. By tracing how a lawful marriage cannot erase a woman’s past, it indicts systems that convert respectability into coercion. The dinner table, visiting card, and marriage contract become instruments of surveillance, revealing the cruelty of purity politics and the brittleness of status. In dramatizing reputational death as a civil sanction, the play challenges the era’s conflation of morality with social conformity.
