The Sun And The Dark Power E-Book

Stefano Zottele

• Herausgeber: Youcanprint
• Kategorie: Wissenschaft und neue Technologien
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020

Beschreibung

Doing research is like going for mushrooms.If you go where everyone goes, it is unlikely that you will still find something, but the places that are not frequented are of no interest to anyone, and therefore you are likely to be alone with your own research. Just like the sun?

Leseprobe

Since the beginning of cycle 24 I have followed the sun. An article in a newspaper reported the protraction of the solar minimum between the cycle 23 and 24. This involved me immediately. This object to study in detail intrigued me. Especially since it represented, and represents, a challenge. Unlike traditional astronomy and physics, where much has been discovered and defined down to the smallest detail, here I am faced with uncertain scientists, a lot of different hypotheses and often in conflict with each other.

The sun forecast is always short-lived. The facts often happen unexpectedly. Of course, rules were found. But they themselves refer to even more inexplicable variations. In short, the functioning of the sun seems governed by chance.This however refers to ancient wisdom: we cannot aspire to understand these variations more similar to a character than to an inanimate object. And such a powerful and bizarre, and terrible character could have made appear in many primitive civilizations the figure of the sun as a God .

Now we know something, especially in the general aspects derived from the observation of the stars, but we lack an understanding of the detail of its functioning, of the forces that determine and regulate the solar cycles and those that cause, within the latter, all the sudden, and often violent, variations that occur very quickly, often on a daily basis or even within a few minutes.

An original way to guided my observations. I will try to illustrate it in these pages. At the end of the book a few web pages are mentioned. They are kept updated daily to confirm what seems to be happening.  

Impressions

I started by downloading the graphs of all the previous solar cycles formed by the line that united all the monthly averages of each cycle and that of the annual average of the same. The line of the F10.7 was also reported.

For a long time I preferred the latter as less arbitrary as passively measured. The counting of the spots had initially seemed often uncertain to me: some rely on more powerful telescopes and even count smaller spots. Then, over time, however, I began to appreciate both. As the first is also subject to a huge series of checks that eventually eliminate all the possible known deviations or at least reduce them to truly minimal factors.

Both the discoveries of the cycle and of the evolution of the position of the spots to form the butterfly chart, took place during the 19th century. The current observations and works of various kinds have done nothing but confirm and better define the existence of these observed phenomena but have not really added anything new to them.

There is always a mystery, vaguely illuminated by the theory of the solar dynamo, why the solar cycles occur, why they occur in varying intensity and duration, and what the energies are that make them grow or decrease. We see them follow each other in an unpredictable way but we cannot understand them, we appeal to chance.

However, the rules should exist as it does not seem possible that not only the cycles are evident but also that the spots move from the higher latitudes to the lower ones as the cycle progresses. These phenomena are constant.

A line of research fascinated me during this first period: that of the influences of the movement of planets on solar manifestations. I have tried to follow Landscheidt's writings that linked the energy value recorded on earth to particular configurations of the planets Uranus, Neptune, Saturn and Jupiter.

The Sun's response to these configurations seemed rather evident. Of course, the historical series were based on projections in the past made with proxies still being perfected. Unfortunately, this study has been abruptly stopped.

Other scholars have also found links (Scalfetta and others 2015) between phenomena highlighted in 1600 by the first scholars of the solar system and solar behavior. Reference is to what is defined by the "harmonic system".

I mention briefly, the study is interesting, original, but I am not able to fully appreciate its mathematical-statistical implications.

Already to the first scholars a series of harmonies appeared evident in the distribution of the planets around the sun and in their movement.

Jupiter and Saturn join only in three positions; the planets have arranged themselves in orbits that recall almost exactly a simple numerical series; the conjunction between Earth and Venus almost exactly repeats an octagon pattern, and every time it happens with Venus which always shows us the same hemisphere; more sophisticated calculations seem to indicate an exact mathematical arrangement of the planets around the Sun.

The amount of energy emitted by the Sun seems to obey exactly this harmonic pattern.

But I leave to you the pleasure of discovering these details, I am only interested in communicating that I was ready to observe some sign capable of showing me a way that would help me find a logical sense in solar activity.

I don't think it's possible that everything happens randomly.

Looking at the graphs of the solar cycles, I focused on a substantial difference between them: some, like cycle 21, had a regular trend, a growth in constant activity up to a maximum and then a rather regular decline; others, such as cycle 23, had an ambiguous peak, grew regularly, then began to decline but, suddenly began to grow again, and then declined more or less regularly.