162,99 €
Sensory evaluation is a scientific discipline used to evoke, measure, analyse and interpret responses to products perceived through the senses of sight, smell, touch, taste and hearing. It is used to reveal insights into the way in which sensory properties drive consumer acceptance and behaviour, and to design products that best deliver what the consumer wants. It is also used at a more fundamental level to provide a wider understanding of the mechanisms involved in sensory perception and consumer behaviour.
Sensory perception of products alters considerably during the course of consumption/use. Special techniques are used in product development to measure these changes in order to optimise product delivery to consumers. Time-Dependent Measures of Perception in Sensory Evaluation explores the many facets of time-dependent perception including mastication and food breakdown, sensory-specific satiety and sensory memory. Both traditional and cutting-edge techniques and applications used to measure temporal changes in sensory perception over time are reviewed, and insights into the way in which sensory properties drive consumer acceptance and behaviour are provided.
This book will be a valuable resource for sensory professionals working in academia and industry, including sensory scientists, practitioners, trainers and students; and industry-based researchers in QA/QC, R&D and marketing.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 894
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017
The series is intended as a follow‐up to Sensory Evaluation: A Practical Handbook, published in May 2009. This book was focused on the practical aspects of sensory testing, presented in a simple, ‘how to’ style for use by industry and academia as a step‐by‐step guide to carrying out a basic range of sensory tests. In‐depth coverage was deliberately kept to a minimum. The series is intended to give theoretical background, more complex techniques and in‐depth discussion on application of sensory evaluation that were not covered in the Practical Handbook. However, the series will seek to maintain the practical approach of the handbook and chapters will include a clear case study with sufficient detail to enable practitioners to carry out the techniques presented.
EDITED BY
Joanne Hort
Associate Professor, Sensory Science Centre,University of Nottingham, UK
Sarah E. Kemp
Consultant and formerly Head of Global Sensoryand Consumer Guidance, Cadbury Schweppes, UK
Tracey Hollowood
Director of Sensory and Consumer Research,Sensory Dimensions Ltd, Nottingham, UK
This edition first published 2017© 2017 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Registered officeJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial offices9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UKThe Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030‐5774, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley‐blackwell.
The right of Joanne Hort, Sarah E. Kemp, and Tracey Hollowood to be identified as the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author(s) have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data
Names: Hort, Joanne, editor. | Kemp, Sarah E., editor. | Hollowood, Tracey, editor.Title: Time‐dependent measures of perception in sensory evaluation / edited by Joanne Hort, Sarah E. Kemp, Tracey Hollowood.Description: Chichester, UK ; Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index.Identifiers: LCCN 2016042861| ISBN 9780470671382 (cloth) | ISBN 9781118991688 (epdf) | ISBN 9781118991626 (epub)Subjects: LCSH: Sensory evaluation. | Perception.Classification: LCC QP435 .K442 2016 | DDC 612.8–dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016042861
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Cover image: Gettyimages/nepstock
To Campbell, Emma and LaraTo George, Elizabeth, George and WilliamTo Mike, Holly and Socks
Joanne Hort, BEd (Hons), PhD, CSci, FIFST, RSensSci, is the SABMiller Chair of Sensory Science at the University of Nottingham. Initially, Professor Hort studied food technology and began her career in teaching. However, she returned to university to receive her doctorate concerning the modelling of the sensory attributes of cheese from analytical and instrumental measures in 1998. As a lecturer at Sheffield Hallam University, she carried out sensory consultancy for local industry, developed a sensory programme at undergraduate level and oversaw the installation of new sensory facilities before being appointed as Lecturer in Sensory Science at the University of Nottingham in 2002. There, she established the University of Nottingham Sensory Science Centre, which is now internationally renowned for both its sensory training and research into flavour perception. She obtained her Chair in 2013 and developed a passion to understand the complexity of beer flavour. Her multidisciplinary approach combining analytical, brain imaging and sensory techniques provides rich insight into multisensory interactions, individual variation and temporal changes in flavour perception, and the emotional response to sensory properties leading to over 65 publications. She leads the International Centre for Brewing Science group at Nottingham, which has an international reputation for its brewing research and innovative postgraduate training programmes. Joanne sits on the editorial board for Food Quality and Preference, Chemosensory Perception and the Journal of American Society of Brewing Chemists. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Food Science and Technology and member of the American Society of Brewing Chemists and Institute of Brewers and Distillers. She is a founder member and past Chair of the European Sensory Science Society and a founder member, past Chair and examiner for the IFST’s Sensory Science Group.
Sarah Elizabeth Kemp, BSc (Hons), PhD, CSci, FIFST RSensSci, is a chartered sensory and consumer science professional with more than 30 years of experience in academia and industry. Dr Kemp gained a BSc in Food Technology in 1986 and a PhD in Taste Chemistry in 1989 from the Food Science and Technology Department at the University of Reading, UK. In 1990, she did a postdoctoral research fellowship in sensory science at the Monell Chemical Senses Centre in Philadelphia, USA. Dr Kemp has held numerous positions in industry, including Manager of Sensory Psychology (US) and Director of European Consumer and Marketing Research (France) in the Fragrance Division at Givaudan, Product Area Leader and Sensory Science Leader in Foods Consumer Science at Unilever Research, Colworth, UK, Head of Global Sensory and Consumer Guidance at Cadbury Schweppes, UK, and Director of Sensory and Consumer Services at Reading Scientific Services Limited, UK. Dr Kemp has also set up and run her own consultancy service and catering company. She has written numerous scientific articles in the field of sensory evaluation, has provided sensory training courses, including lecturing on the European Masters Course in Food Science, and has worked on bodies developing standards in sensory evaluation, including the British Standards Institute and ASTM International. She is a founder member, past Chair and examiner for the Sensory Science Group of the Institute of Food Science and Technology, as well as being a member of other professional sensory societies. Her other activities include Governor of East Kent College, UK.
Tracey Hollowood, BSc (Hons), PhD, MIFST
Tracey is currently Director of Sensory and Consumer Research for Sensory Dimensions (Nottingham) Ltd in the UK. She has over 25 years experience in academia and industry; she worked at Nottingham University for 10 years during which time she achieved her doctorate investigating perceptual taste‐texture‐aroma interactions. She established the UK's first Postgraduate Certificate in Sensory Science and designed and managed the University's prestigious Sensory Science Centre. Her research focused on psychophysical studies, interactions in sensory modalities and fundamental method development. She has over 20 peer reviewed publications; has run numerous workshops and delivered oral presentations to many international audiences including at the Pangborn Sensory Science Symposia 2015 in Gothenburg. She has participated in the organisation of seven international symposia, including International Symposium of Taste 2000 and Pangborn 2005 in Harrogate. Tracey is a previous chair of the Institute of Food Science and Technology (IFST) Midland branch and the Professional Food Sensory Group (PFSG), now the Sensory Science Group (SSG).
Annie BlissettSensory Science Centre, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK
Guy CarpenterKing’s College, London, UK
Samantha CatonUniversity of Leeds, Institute of Psychological Sciences, UK
Carolina ChayaDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Statistics and Management Science, Technical University of Madrid, Spain
Caterina DinnellaDipartimento di Gestione dei Sistemi Agrari, Alimentari e Forestali (GESAAF), Università degli, Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy
Christopher J. FindlayCompusense Inc., Guelph, Canada
Marion M. HetheringtonUniversity of Leeds, Institute of Psychological Sciences, UK
Louise HewsonSensory Science Centre, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK
Tracey HollowoodDirector of Sensory and Consumer Research for Sensory Dimensions, Nottingham, UK
Joanne HortSABMiller Chair of Sensory Science, University of Nottingham, UK
Linda JamiesonUnilever R&D, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK
Sarah E. KempFormer Head of Global Sensory and Consumer Guidance at Cadbury Schweppes, UK
Ep KösterEmeritus Professor, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Carla KuestenConsumer Product Research, Amway Research and Development, USA
Nathalie MartinNestle Research Centre, Switzerland
Jos MojetWageningen UR, Wageningen, Netherlands
Erminio MonteleoneDipartimento di Gestione dei Sistemi Agrari, Alimentari e Forestali (GESAAF), Università degli, Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy
Chandani NekitsingUniversity of Leeds, Institute of Psychological Sciences, UK
Nicolas PineauNestlé Research Centre, Nestec SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Tracey SandersonDirector Sensory and Consumer Research for Sensory Dimensions, Reading, UK
Pascal SchlichCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, Dijon, France
Amparo TarregaSensory Science Centre, Division of Food Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK
Emma WantlingUnilever R&D, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, UK
Sensory evaluation is a scientific discipline used to evoke, measure, analyse and interpret responses to products perceived through the senses of sight, smell, touch, taste and hearing (Anonymous, 1975). It is used to reveal insights into the way in which sensory properties drive consumer acceptance and behaviour, and to design products that best deliver what consumers want. It is also used at a more fundamental level to provide a wider understanding of the mechanisms involved in sensory perception and consumer behaviour.
Sensory evaluation emerged as a field in the 1940s. It began as simple ‘taste testing’ typically used in the food industry for judging the quality of products such as tea, cheese, beer, and so on. From the 1950s to the 1970s, it evolved into a series of techniques to objectively and reliably measure sensory properties of products, and was typically used to service quality assurance and product development. Through the 1980s and 1990s, the use of computers for data collection and statistical analysis increased the speed and sophistication of the field, so that sensory, consumer and physicochemical data could be combined to design products that delivered to consumer needs.
Today, sensory evaluation is a sophisticated, decision‐making tool that is used in partnership with marketing, research and development and quality assessment and control throughout the product lifecycle to enable consumer‐led product design and decision making. Its application has spread from the food industry to many others, such as personal care, household care, cosmetic, flavours, fragrances and even the automotive industry. Although it is already widely used by major companies in the developed market, its use continues to grow in emerging markets, smaller companies and new product categories, as sensory evaluation is increasingly recognised as a necessary tool for competitive advantage.
The field of sensory evaluation will continue to evolve and it is expected that faster, more flexible and more sophisticated techniques will be developed. Social networking tools are already transforming the way research is undertaken, enabling direct and real‐time engagement with consumers. The use of sensory evaluation by marketing departments will continue to grow, particularly in leveraging the link between product sensory properties and emotional benefits for use in branding and advertising. Advances in other fields, such as genomics, brain imaging, and instrumental analysis, will be coupled with sensory evaluation to provide a greater understanding of perception.
Owing to the rapid growth and sophistication of the field of sensory evaluation in recent years, it is no longer possible to give anything but a brief overview of individual topics in a single general sensory science textbook. The trend is towards more specialised sensory books that focus on one specific topic, and to date, these have been produced in an ad‐hoc fashion by different authors/editors. Many areas remain uncovered.
We, the editors, wanted to share our passion for sensory evaluation by producing a comprehensive series of detailed books on individual topics in sensory evaluation. We are enthusiastic devotees of sensory evaluation, who are excited to act as editors to promote sensory science. Between us, we have over 70 years of industrial and academic experience in sensory science, covering food, household and personal care products in manufacturing, food service, consultancy and provision of sensory analysis services at local, regional and global levels. We have published and presented widely in the field; taught workshops, short courses and lecture series; and acted as reviewers, research supervisors, thesis advisors, project managers and examiners. We have been active in many sensory‐related professional bodies, including the Institute of Food Science and Technology Sensory Science Group, of which we are all past Chairs, the European Sensory Science Society, of which one of us is a past Chair, the Institute of Food Technologists, the British Standards Institute and ASTM International, to name but a few. As such, we are well placed to have a broad perspective of sensory evaluation, and pleased to be able to call on our network of sensory evaluation colleagues to collaborate with us.
The book series Sensory Evaluation covers the field of sensory evaluation at an advanced level and aims to:
be a comprehensive, in‐depth series on sensory evaluation
cover traditional and cutting‐edge techniques and applications in sensory evaluation using the world’s foremost experts
reach a broad audience of sensory scientists, practitioners and students by balancing theory, methodology and practical application
reach industry practitioners by illustrating how sensory can be applied throughout the product life cycle, including development, manufacture, supply chain and marketing
cover a broad range of product applications, including food, beverages, personal care and household products.
Our philosophy is to include cutting‐edge theory and methodology, as well as illustrating the practical application of sensory evaluation. As sensory practitioners, we are always interested in how methods are actually carried out in the laboratory. Often, key details of the practicalities are omitted in journal papers and other scientific texts. We have encouraged authors to include such details in the hope that readers will be able to replicate methods themselves. The focus of sensory texts often tends to be food and beverage products assessed using olfaction and taste. We have asked authors to take a broad perspective to include non‐food products and all the senses.
The book series is aimed at sensory professionals working in academia and industry, including sensory scientists, practitioners, trainers and students; and industry‐based professionals in marketing, research and development and quality assurance/control, who need to understand sensory evaluation and how it can benefit them. The series is suitable as:
reference texts for sensory scientists, from industry to academia
teaching aids for senior staff with responsibility for training in an academic or industrial setting
course books, some of which to be personally owned by students undertaking academic study or industrial training
reference texts suitable across a broad range of industries; for example, food, beverages, personal care products, household products, flavours, fragrances.
The first book in the series, Sensory Evaluation: A Practical Handbook was published in May 2009. This book focuses on the practical aspects of sensory testing, presented in a simple, ‘how to’ style for use by industry and academia as a step‐by‐step guide to carrying out a basic range of sensory tests. In‐depth coverage was deliberately kept to a minimum. Further books in the series cover the basic methodologies used in the field of sensory evaluation: discrimination testing, descriptive analysis, time‐dependent measures of perception and consumer research. They give theoretical background, more complex techniques and in‐depth discussion on application of sensory evaluation, whilst seeking to maintain the practical approach of the handbook. Chapters include clear case studies with sufficient detail to enable practitioners to carry out the techniques presented. Later books will cover a broad range of sensory topics, including applications and emerging trends.
The contributors we have selected are world‐renowned scientists and leading experts in their field. Where possible, we have used originators of techniques. We have learned a lot from them as we have worked with them to shape each book. We wish to thank them for accepting our invitation to write chapters and for the time and effort they have put in to making their chapters useful and enjoyable for readers.
We would also like to thank our publisher, Wiley Blackwell, and particularly extend our thanks to David McDade, Andrew Harrison and their tea for seeing the potential in this series and helping us bring it to fruition. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers of the series for their constructive comments.
We hope you will find the Sensory Evaluation book series both interesting and beneficial, and enjoy reading it as much as we have producing it.
Joanne HortSarah E. KempTracey Hollowood
Anonymous (1975).
Minutes of Division Business Meeting
. Institute of Food Technologists – Sensory Evaluation Division, IFT, Chicago, IL.
Perception is a dynamic process, changing both in the short and long term and in several different ways. A need to understand such changes and their implications for sensory and consumer studies was the motivation for this book. The sensory properties of food and beverages alter quite considerably as they are manipulated and swallowed in the oral cavity, the feel of moisturiser changes as it is massaged into the skin and the perfume associated with air fresheners and fabric softeners fades, and can change in nature, as time passes. Furthermore, our physiology has evolved to react to changes in our environment as opposed to things that are constant via the mechanism of adaptation. Repeated exposure to the same stimulus results in a drop in perceived intensity of that stimulus, effects other sensations via interactions between and within the senses.
Interestingly, it is not just the perception of sensory properties that are time dependent. Our affective response to the continued consumption of the same food can also diminish over short time periods; for example, the course of a meal, owing to an inbuilt biological mechanism known as sensory‐specific satiety, which helps promotes the intake of a more varied diet. It is also evident that product preferences are not stable over time and this affects our food choice and purchase behaviours. Our perceptual experiences are held within our sensory memory and they have a key role in determining product expectations and choice behaviours.
The last 60 years have seen many investigations into the temporal elements of perception, particularly taste and flavour perception, but at the current time there is no book which brings together current knowledge on time‐dependent measures of sensory perception. Hence, we have taken the opportunity, as part of our book series on ‘sensory evaluation’, to devote a whole textbook to this important topic for the sensory scientist. Each chapter provides insights into the scientific background of the subject matter before providing descriptions and evaluations of relevant methodologies, practical tips and case study examples.
The book itself is divided into five sections: Section 1: Introduction; Section 2: Physiological and psychological aspects of time‐dependent sensory perception; Section 3: Techniques; Section 4: Applications; Section 5: Summary.
Following on from a general introduction to the measurement of time‐dependent perception in Section 1, Section 2 is devoted to chapters written by experts in the field which reflect on the physiological and psychological aspects influencing time‐dependant perception. An understanding of these factors is key to the development of sensory methods and test protocols as well as in the interpretation of sensory data. The first chapter in this section provides an understanding of salivation and mastication, processes which have a profound effect on the perceived sensory properties of a food. The following chapter not only delivers an overview of the processes involved in sensory specific satiety but also discusses the methods that can be employed for its measurement. Chapter 4 describes the mechanisms involved and perceptual consequences of sensory adaptation. Importantly it provides valuable insights into how adaptation affects can be managed within the design of sensory studies. The final two chapters in this section come from experts in the field of memory and liking, Ep Köster and Jos Mojet. The first looks at the concept of sensory memory and the methods used to measure it, together with particularly interesting sections showing how sensory memory is central to consumer insight research and the training of sensory panels. The second looks at the vast array of factors affecting the dynamics of liking, before reviewing both the traditional and emerging methodologies available to measure changes in liking, and ends with some practical applications.
Although the need to measure temporal elements of perception in foods was recognised back in the 1930s, the first method to measure it was the time–intensity technique published by Sjostrom and Cairncross in 1953. It was adopted widely and Lee and Pangborn (1986), and Cliff and Heymann (1994) have both written reviews of its application during the last century. Other approaches capturing time‐dependent elements of perception have since been developed and Section 3 is devoted to chapters which describe the now established techniques within the sensory toolbox that can capture changes in sensory properties over time. Chapter 7 provides the reader with a general overview of the considerations needed for any technique including guidelines regarding which approach to choose for a particular purpose. Chapters 8–12 then provide background on the specific techniques of discrete, continuous and dual‐attribute time–intensity, temporal dominance of sensations and multiple‐sample time–intensity.
Section 4 provides an overview of the application of different temporal techniques to both food and non‐food products, and in flavour research. Section 5 completes the book, with an evaluation of the current situation concerning time‐dependent measures of perception, recent developments and considerations for the future.
We hope you find this text a valuable addition to your sensory library and a useful guide for your time‐dependent sensory investigations.
The Editors
Professor Joanne HortDr Sarah E. KempDr Tracey Hollowood
Cliff, M. and Heymann, H. (1994) Development and use of time–intensity methodology for sensory evaluation: a review.
Food Research International
, 26, 375–385.
Holway, A.H. and Hurvich, L.M. (1937) Differential gustatory sensitivity to salt.
American Journal of Psychology
, 49, 37–48.
Lee, W.E. III and Pangborn, R.M. (1986) Time–intensity: the temporal aspects of sensory perception.
Food Technology
, 40(11), 71–82.
The authors would like to thank Linda Vickerstaff at the University of Nottingham for her able assistance in checking the spelling, grammar and layout of all the chapters.
Joanne Hort, Tracey Hollowood and Sarah E. Kemp
Perception of a product is a dynamic process. This description concerning drinking beer (Bickham, 1997) is a great example outlining one of the many temporal sensory journeys encountered by consumers when interacting with products.
From the moment the bottle is opened and the beer is poured into a glass, our ears are greeted by the hiss of escaping carbon dioxide. Our eyes are attracted by the sparkling clarity of a Pilsener, the hazy sheen of a Weizen, or the black depth of a stout. We patiently wait for the creamy head to slowly collapse, leaving wisps of Belgian lace on the sides of the glass. As we bring the beer to our lips, our nose detects the aroma of citrusy hops in an American pale ale, bittersweet chocolate in a porter, or perhaps fruity, spicy esters in a Trappist ale. Finally, we imbibe, savouring the malt, hop, and ester flavours before swallowing to let the hop alpha‐acids wake the taste buds on the back of the tongue. We take another drink and swish the beer through our mouth to evaluate the body and mouthfeel. Ah, this seems like a well‐made beer – but wait! What is that lingering aftertaste? Does it taste like cooked cabbage, or is it perhaps reminiscent of newly mown grass? Is that a hint of paper or leather in the background?’
Wine, chocolate, ice cream and chewing gum are all further obvious examples of food products whose sensory properties change dynamically during oral processing, but in fact all food and beverages will be warmed, mixed and manipulated to some degree in the mouth resulting in changeable sensory profiles. Of course, it is not just simply foods which exhibit temporal sensory profiles – for example, the vibrancy of lipstick, persistency of a hair dye and the intensity and nature of perfumes, cologne, air fresheners, fabric conditioners and deodorants are all attributes which also change overtime and are regarded as quality attributes by the consumer. Descriptive techniques at different time points have been widely adopted and adapted for many different types of products including foods, beverages, fragrances, cosmetics, personal care and household products.
Measures made at a single time point, such as those obtained through traditional descriptive analysis techniques (Kemp et al., 2016) require assessors, or even consumers, to make an evaluation at one time point and hence do not capture the full temporal sensory encounter. Such evaluations are likely to be an integration of the whole experience (Dijksterhuis and Piggot, 2000), or depending on the assessor or tasting protocol, specific to a certain point in time. Thus, it is not surprising that temporal methods that captured dynamic changes began to be developed alongside other sensory techniques. The need to measure attribute intensity over time was initially recognised in the literature as an important aspect of taste perception in 1937 by Holway and Hurvich (1937). In the fifties, Sjostrom (1954) began quantifying the temporal response and, over the next three decades, developments in the technique and particularly its data acquisition methods (for example: Jellinek, 1964; Meiselman, 1968; McNulty and Moskowitz, 1974; Larson‐Powers and Pangborn, 1978; Lawless and Skinner, 1979; Birch and Munton, 1981; Munoz et al., 1986; Guinard et al., 1985; Lee, 1985) saw its wide application to taste and flavour perception (Cliff and Heymann, 1993). Not surprisingly, there have been several useful published reviews of the technique to which the reader is directed (Lee and Pangborn, 1986; Cliff and Heymann, 1993; and Dijksterhuis and Piggott, 2000).
Initially, time–intensity (TI) data were collected at discrete time points defined by the investigator. However, the development of chart recorders and computer programs allowed for the collection of continuous data. Nowadays, the choice between discrete and continuous TI (CTI) techniques is related to the objective of the test – for short events, CTI is ideal but for longer investigations, e.g. the intensity of fabric conditioner fragrance on laundry, judgements made at discrete well‐defined time points are most effective. Chapters 8 and 9 in this text provide an updated look at developments in discrete and CTI methods, respectively, and provide guidance on specific methodological considerations and data analysis techniques. Each also provides useful case studies highlighting the effective application of these techniques.
CTI was designed to follow the perceptual intensity of a single attribute, and has been useful to investigate key product attributes, such as mint flavour in chewing gum, but it is rare for products to vary in just one characteristic over time. Methods have since been developed which track the intensity of more than one attribute, such as progressive profiling (Jack et al., 1994); the dynamic flavour profile method (DeRovira 1996), sequential profiling (Methven et al., 2010) and dual‐attribute TI (DATI; Duizer et al., 1996, 1997). The last is the subject of Chapter 10.
