Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics E-Book

Thomas D. Taylor

• Herausgeber: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc
• Kategorie: Fachliteratur
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 707

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2000

Beschreibung

Within the growing body of literature dedicated to the subspecialty of maxillofacial prosthetics, this book fills a genuine need for a hands-on clinical guide to performing the challenging prosthodontic procedures required by this patient population. Based on careful discussion of both general and specific prosthodontic principles and techniques rather than on numerous case reports, and minimizing surgical and medical considerations that are more adequately addressed elsewhere, this user's guide will be a valuable addition to the libraries of practicing prosthodontists, general and hospital dentists, and others not formally trained in the subspecialty of maxillofacial prosthetics.

Leseprobe

Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics / edited by Thomas D. Taylor.

p. ; cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 0-86715-391-1

eISBN 978-0-86715-695-9

1. Maxillofacial prosthesis. 2. Face—surgery. 3. Jaws—Surgery. I. Taylor, Thomas D. (Thomas Dean)

[DNLM: 1. Maxillofacial Prosthesis. 2. Maxillofacial Abnormalities—surgery. 3. Maxillofacial Injuries—surgery. 4. Maxillofacial Prosthesis Implantation. WU 600 C641 2000]

RD523.C55 2000

617.5'2059—dc21

00-044565

© 2000 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

551 Kimberly Drive

Carol Stream, Illinois 60188

All rights reserved. This book or any part thereof may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher.

CPT five digit codes, nomenclature and other data are © 1998 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. No fee schedules, basic units, relative values or related listings are included in CPT. The AMA assumes no liability for the data contained herein.

Editor: Lori A. Bateman

Production: Susan E. Robinson

Design: Michael Shanahan

Contents

Foreword

Preface

Contributors

Chapter 1Psychological Management of the Maxillofacial Prosthetic Patient

Jonathan P. Wiens/Ronald L. Wiens

Chapter 2Reimbursement Considerations for the Maxillofacial Prosthetic Practice

Alan J. Hickey/Jonathan P. Wiens/Thomas R. Cowper

Chapter 3The Radiation Therapy Patient: Treatment Planning and Posttreatment Care

Donald C. Kramer

Chapter 4Resin Bonding for Maxillofacial Prostheses

JamesBrudvik/Thomas D. Taylor

Chapter 5Nasoalveolar Molding in Early Management of Cleft Lip and Palate

Lawrence E. Brecht/Barry H. Grayson/Court B. Cutting

Chapter 6Clinical Management of the Edentulous Maxillectomy Patient

Rhonda F. Jacob

Chapter 7Clinical Management of the Dentate Maxillectomy Patient

Michael R. Arcuri/Thomas D. Taylor

Chapter 8Clinical Management of the Soft Palate Defect

Steven E. Eckert/Ronald P. Desjardins/Thomas D. Taylor

Chapter 9Clinical Application of the Palatal Lift

Kendra S. Schaefer/Thomas D. Taylor

Chapter 10The Impact of Endosseous Implants on Maxillofacial Prosthetics

Steven E. Eckert/Ronald P. Desjardins

Chapter 11Diagnostic Considerations for Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of the Mandibulectomy Patient

Thomas D. Taylor

Chapter 12Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of the Mandibulectomy Patient

Rhonda F. Jacob

Chapter 13Implant Rehabilitation of the Mandible Compromised by Radiotherapy

Jeffrey E. Rubenstein

Chapter 14Prosthodontic Rehabilitation Following Total and Partial Glossectomy

Hussein S. Zaki

Chapter 15Treatment of Upper Airway Sleep Disorder Patients with Dental Devices

John R. Ivanhoe

Chapter 16Facial Prosthesis Fabrication: Technical Aspects

Carl J. Andres/Steven P. Haug

Chapter 17Facial Prosthesis Fabrication: Coloration Techniques

RosemarySeelaus/Randall J. Troppmann

Chapter 18Fabrication of Custom Ocular Prostheses

Steven P. Haug/Carl J. Andres

Chapter 19Craniofacial Osseointegration: Prosthodontic Treatment

John F. Wolfaardt/Gordon H. Wilkes/James D. Anderson

Index

Foreword

Following World War II, an era of specialization among health care professionals ensued. In dentistry, medicine, and surgery, specialists were trained to keep pace with the rapidly growing body of knowledge that evolved from new developments in diagnosis, treatment methods, instrumentation, materials, and technology. As a subspecialty area of the recognized dental specialty prosthodontics, maxillofacial prosthetics has become an essential patient-care link between dentistry and surgery.

Because patient populations and life expectancy have increased, the need for maxillofacial prosthetic services has also grown. While much of this treatment must necessarily be provided in hospital settings, the technology and economic aspects of patient care have altered previous traditional approaches to its provision. Having undergone some evolutionary change, the principles, concepts, and practices applicable to prosthodontic treatment still constitute the fundamental basis for sound maxillofacial prosthetic therapy. The underlying intent of this book, as succinctly expressed by the author in his preface, reflects cognizance of those factors and endeavors to facilitate their application by whomever and wherever the services are being provided.

To enunciate the scope of prosthodontic procedures and techniques involved in maxillofacial treatment, an impressive roster of contributors has been assembled. All have acknowledged expertise and broad experience in clinical practice. Detail and depth of information related to the clinical application of specific topics addressed in the book chapters should enable the interested reader to appropriately treat or refer the potential patient for needed services.

This work provides a logical collection and elucidation of pertinent intra- and extraoral subject matter as an excellent current reference resource and addition to the maxillofacial prosthetic literature.

William R. Laney, DMD, MS

Professor EmeritusDepartment of DentistryMayo Clinic–Mayo Medical SchoolRochester, Minnesota

Preface

The subspecialty of maxillofacial prosthetics currently finds itself experiencing more change than at any other time over the past 50 years of its recognized existence. Advances in surgical and therapeutic modalities for the treatment of patients with head and neck malignancy, post–tumor therapy surgical reconstruction, and congenital and developmental defects have challenged traditional prosthodontic principles for the management of the many patients needing our services. The ranks of those providing traditional maxillofacial prosthetic services have expanded to include prosthodontists, general and hospital dentists, and others not formally trained in the subspecialty. The practice of maxillofacial prosthetics has also been dramatically impacted by third parties not directly involved with the provision of patient care but whose activities dramatically affect our ability to treat. These concerns, changing treatment philosophies and methods, and the challenge of practicing maxillofacial prosthetics in private practice as well as in institutional environs were the impetus for creating this book. A conscious decision was made to focus on the “how to” rather than the historical basis for treatment or the medical background of involved disease processes.

A number of excellent texts have been written on the subject of maxillofacial prosthetics. By review of my own library, at least nine full texts have been dedicated to the subject in the past 50 years. They have addressed the subspecialty and have to a greater or lesser degree also dealt with the medical management of patients whose circumstances require maxillofacial prosthetic care. The drawback of this approach has been a tendency to oversimplify medical/surgical treatment or to narrowly focus on the therapeutic philosophy and protocol of specific medical centers without addressing the full extent of accepted treatment modalities and philosophies. Medical/surgical modalities for the treatment of congenital, developmental, and acquired maxillofacial defects frequently change so rapidly that the therapies described in texts on maxillofacial prosthetics are often outdated by the time the book is published. To address these problems, this book has been written with a focus on the prosthodontic aspects of care for our patient population. For a review of the etiology, pathology, or therapeutic management for a specific type of tumor or congenital defect, the reader is directed to books or journals that deal primarily with such procedures.

This book is an in-depth review of prosthodontic procedures as they are applied in the maxillofacial situation. The subspecialty of maxillofacial prosthetics is frequently practiced by prosthodontists and occasionally by general dentists in a hospital environment who have not had the benefit of formal training in the subspecialty. It is hoped that this book will be of use to those individuals by serving as a “how-to” reference emphasizing prosthodontic procedures while minimizing surgical/medical considerations that can more appropriately be found elsewhere. To that end, Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics is written as a user’s guide to commonly occurring maxillofacial prosthetic challenges. This approach is based upon careful discussion of both general and specific prosthodontic principles and techniques rather than on numerous case reports of limited value to the general reader.

I would like to acknowledge the various chapter authors, some 25 of them, whose efforts have made this text an outstanding contribution to the subspecialty. Each author was recruited because of recognized expertise in a particular topic area. I am indebted to their dedication, their interest, and their energy in making this text a reality and in making it such a substantial addition to the prosthodontic literature. Heartfelt thanks to each and every one.

Contributors

James D. Anderson, BSc, DDS, MScD

Professor

Faculty of Dentistry

University of Toronto

Medical Director, Craniofacial Prosthetic Unit

Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Carl J. Andres, DDS, MSD

Professor and Director

Graduate Prosthodontics

Indiana University School of Dentistry

Indianapolis, Indiana

Michael R. Arcuri, DDS, MS

Private practice of prosthodontics and maxillofacial prosthetics

Cedar Falls, Iowa

Former Director, Graduate Prosthodontics

West Virginia University

School of Dentistry

Morgantown, West Virginia

Lawrence E. Brecht, DDS

Assistant Professor of Clinical Surgery

Director of Dental Services

Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery

New York University School of Medicine

Clinical Associate Professor, Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Sciences

Director of Maxillofacial Prosthetics

New York University College of Dentistry

Private practice of prosthodontics

New York, New York

James Brudvik, DDS

Professor Emeritus

Department of Prosthodontics

Former Director, Graduate Prosthodontics

University of Washington

School of Dentistry

Seattle, Washington

Thomas R. Cowper, DDS

Head, Section of Maxillofacial Prosthetics

The Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio

Court B. Cutting, MD

Associate Professor of Clinical Surgery (Plastic Surgery)

Director, The Cleft Palate Center

Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery

New York University School of Medicine

Private practice of plastic and reconstructive surgery

New York, New York

Ronald P. Desjardins, DMD, MSD

Professor

Mayo Medical School

Consultant in Prosthodontics

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota

Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS

Assistant Professor

Mayo Medical School

Consultant in Prosthodontics

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota

Barry H. Grayson, DDS

Associate Professor of Clinical Surgery (Orthodontics)

Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery

New York University School of Medicine

Clinical Associate Professor, Division of Growth and Developmental Sciences

New York University College of Dentistry

New York, New York

Steven P. Haug, DDS, MSD

Associate Professor

Department of Prosthodontics

Indiana University School of Dentistry

Indianapolis, Indiana

Alan J. Hickey, DMD

Private practice of prosthodontics and maxillofacial prosthetics

Active staff, Maine Medical Center

Portland, Maine

John R. Ivanhoe, DDS

Associate Professor

Department of Oral Rehabilitation

Medical College of Georgia

School of Dentistry

Augusta, Georgia

Donald C. Kramer, DDS, MS

Staff Prosthodontist and Associate Professor of Dental Oncology (retired)

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas

Rhonda F. Jacob, DDS, MS

Professor and Staff Prosthodontist

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas

Jeffrey E. Rubenstein, DMD, MS

Associate Professor

Department of Prosthodontics

Director, Prosthodontic Faculty Practice and Maxillofacial Prosthetics

University of Washington School of Dentistry

Seattle, Washington

Kendra S. Schaefer, DMD

Assistant Professor

Center for Maxillofacial Reconstruction

Division of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

University of Pennsylvania Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Rosemary Seelaus, BS, MAMS

Anaplastologist

Craniofacial Osseointegration and Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit (COMPRU)

Misericordia Hospital, Caritas Health Group

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Thomas D. Taylor, DDS, MSD

Professor and Chairman

Department of Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry

University of Connecticut

School of Dental Medicine

Farmington, Connecticut

Randall J. Troppmann, BFA

Anaplastologist

Craniofacial Osseointegration and Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit (COMPRU)

Misericordia Hospital, Caritas Health Group

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Jonathan P. Wiens, DDS, MSD

Private practice of prosthodontics

West Bloomfield, Michigan

Adjunct Professor

Department of Prosthodontics

University of Detroit

Mercy School of Dentistry

Detroit, Michigan

Ronald L. Wiens, BA, MA, ACSW

Private practice of psychotherapy

Director of Adult and Family Services

Downriver Guidance Clinic

Southgate, Michigan

Gordon H. Wilkes, MD, FRCSC

Director

Craniofacial Osseointegration and Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit (COMPRU)

Misericordia Hospital, Caritas Health Group

Clinical Professor

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

John F. Wolfaardt, BDS, MDent, PhD

Director

Craniofacial Osseointegration and Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit (COMPRU)

Misericordia Hospital, Caritas Health Group

Professor

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Hussein S. Zaki, DDS, MSc

Professor

Department of Prosthodontics

School of Dental Medicine

Department of Otolaryngology

School of Medicine

University of Pittsburgh

Director, Regional Center for Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

In the process of recording a patient’s chief complaint, present and past illness, medical and dental history, diagnostic records and tests, examination, and adjunctive consultations, the health care provider mentally assesses the patient’s demeanor. Such assessment is necessary to ascertain whether the proposed prosthodontic treatment may be performed efficaciously or understood and appreciated by the patient once it is completed. The prognosis for a successful treatment outcome is dependent upon the prosthodontist making a correct diagnosis and anticipating issues beyond the realm of dentistry alone.

The health care provider in the process of patient evaluation assesses the attitude, demeanor, and/or behavior of the patient and attempts to classify his or her mental status. Patient classifications in and of themselves may offer the clinician a rubric that is critical to patient management and treatment planning. However, it is more important to understand the etiology of behaviors and its potential impact upon the treatment process in order to implement the appropriate care.

Psychological Classification and Interpretation

Prosthodontists often use House’s (1978) classifications of philosophical, exacting, indifferent, and hysterical to categorize the mental status of patients. This approach may be meaningful for the typical prosthodontic patient, but it may fall short in classifying those patients with life-threatening diseases or who have suffered recent traumatic events. Additionally, those patients in whom the face is disfigured and/or those who have lost an important biological function such as speech or swallowing will experience changes in social acceptance that impact the psyche and sense of well-being. The “philosophical” patient, the one who cognitively understands and is rational or who appreciates the prosthodontic treatment being attempted, may abruptly change demeanor upon the challenge of ablation of an extensive facial cancer or a surgical/prosthetic reconstructive outcome that is less than desirable.

As the maxillofacial patient’s quality of life is altered and social integration becomes difficult, the patient’s expectations to return to “normalcy” often collapse. Underlying emotional issues that were subconsciously buried may come to the surface, or unachievable expectations and unreasonable demands may arise that hinder the prosthodontist’s ability to provide adequate treatment. Further, in such a case it is critical for the prosthodontist to assess whether treatment should be performed at all, delayed until the patient’s demeanor is more conducive to treatment, and/or coordinated with services of supportive professionals such as social workers or psychologists (Gillis, 1979).

The prosthodontist’s goal is a successful treatment outcome, but not at the expense of one’s emotional and mental well-being or that of staff. A health care provider is not required to “heal” every patient who walks through the front door. This principle applies to all patients, whether a traditional prosthodontic patient, a temporomandibular disorder patient, or a maxillofacial prosthetic patient. In practice, this principle means that if at the examination level one recognizes a patient with underlying psychological conditions or confounding emotional factors, it may be best to not treat until these are addressed. If treatment commences without the fundamental controls or sufficient rapport in place, the clinician is likely to wonder in the middle of treatment how things ever went awry and regret that treatment ever began. There must be an unconditional commitment to the same treatment goals by both doctor and patient. Therefore, it becomes paramount that the prosthodontist understand the various psychological diagnoses, ranging from subtle emotional nuances to overt psychological disorders, that potentially undermine successful prosthodontic treatment.

The types of psychological impairments that may be anticipated are outlined below. While these summaries are not exhaustive, they can add to any prosthodontist’s knowledge base. The ability of the practitioner to recognize these impairments will facilitate total patient care. Psychological changes that can occur in maxillofacial patients follow with directives presented on the various methods of referral to improve the patient’s mental status prior to treatment.

General Psychological Impairments

The purpose of this section is to provide the prosthodontist with a general understanding of the range of psychological disorders that may be experienced by patients. This section is not intended to be a detailed explanation of all of the disorders described by the American Psychiatric Association. Psychological impairments are characterized by disturbances in a person’s thoughts, emotions, or behavior. These impairments can range from those that cause mild distress to those that severely impair a person’s ability to function individually, in a family, or in a community. Some individuals with acute impairments require hospitalization because they become unable to care for themselves or because they are at risk of harming others or themselves. Most people, however, can recover from mental illness and return to normal lives with appropriate referral and treatment.

Distribution

Mental illness affects people of all ages, races, cultures, and socioeconomic classes. In the United States, researchers estimate that about 24% of people 18 or older, or about 44 million adults, experience a mental illness or substance-related disorder during the course of any given year. The most common of these disorders are depression, alcohol dependence, and various phobias (irrational fears of things or situations). In any given year an estimated 2.6% of adults in the United States, or about 4.8 million people, suffer from a severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or a severe form of depression or panic disorder. An additional 2.8% of adults, or about 5.2 million people, experience a mental illness that seriously interferes with one or more aspects of daily life, such as the ability to work or to relate to other people. Please note that all of these figures exclude people who are homeless and those living in prisons, nursing homes, or other institutions—populations that have high rates of mental illness. International surveys have demonstrated that from 30% to 40% of people in a given population experience a mental illness during their lives. These surveys have also revealed that anxiety disorders are usually more common than depression.

In children and the elderly, rates and forms of mental illness change with age and gender. For example, depression and anxiety disorders occur at the same rate among girls and boys until midadolescence, when girls account for more of the case histories. Among prosthodontic patients, children most often present with congenital defects or alterations in growth and development, whereas adolescents and young adults often present with developmental defects or trauma. Mental illness among the elderly has grown significantly as a greater percentage of people live beyond the age of 65, both in the industrialized nations of the West and in the developing countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Dementia, characterized by impaired intellectual functioning and memory loss, occurs mostly among the elderly and may overlap with the ablative cancer patient groups.

Like physical diseases, the highest rates of mental illness occur among people in the lower socioeconomic classes, especially those living in severe poverty. Rates of almost all mental illnesses decline as levels of income and education increase. The hardships associated with poverty seem to contribute to the development of some mental illnesses, particularly anxiety disorders and depression. In addition, debilitating mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, may cause individuals to shift to lower socioeconomic classes. The ability of maxillofacial patients to integrate into society and to be employable will be critical to their mental status. The overall prevalence rates of mental illnesses among men and women are similar. However, men have much higher rates of antisocial personality disorder and substance abuse. The acquired maxillofacial cancer/defect population may correlate with substance abuse. In the United States, women suffer from depression and anxiety disorders at about twice the rate of men. The gender gap is even wider in some countries. For example, women in China suffer from depression at nine times the rate of men.

Anxiety Disorders

Anxiety disorders involve excessive apprehension, worry, and fear. More than 16 million adults ages 18 to 54 in the United States suffer from anxiety disorders, which include panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), social phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. People with generalized anxiety disorder experience constant anxiety about routine events in their lives. Phobias are fears of specific objects, situations, or activities. Panic disorder is an anxiety disorder in which people experience sudden, intense terror and physical symptoms such as rapid heartbeat and shortness of breath.

Panic disorder affects about 1.7% of the US adult population ages 18 to 54, or 2.4 million people, in a given year. Panic disorder typically strikes in young adulthood. Roughly half of all people who have panic disorder develop the condition before age 24. Women are twice as likely as men to develop panic disorder. People with panic disorder may also suffer from depression and substance abuse. About 30% of people with panic disorder abuse alcohol and 17% abuse drugs such as cocaine and marijuana. About one third of all people with panic disorder develop agoraphobia, an illness in which they become afraid of being in any place or situation where escape might be difficult or help is unavailable in the event of a panic attack.

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder experience intrusive thoughts or images (obsessions) or feel compelled to perform certain behaviors (compulsions). About 2.3% of the US adult population ages 18 to 54, approximately 3.3 million Americans, have OCD in any given year. OCD affects men and women with equal frequency.

Patients with posttraumatic stress disorder relive traumatic events from their past and feel extreme anxiety and distress about the event. In the United States, about 3.6% of adults ages 18 to 54, or 5.2 million people, have PTSD during the course of a given year. PTSD can develop at any age, including childhood. PTSD is more likely to occur in women than in men. About 30% of men and women who have spent time in war zones experience PTSD. The disorder also frequently occurs after violent personal assaults, such as rape, mugging, or domestic violence; terrorism; natural or human-caused disasters; and accidents. Depression, alcohol or other substance abuse, or another anxiety disorder often accompanies PTSD.

About 3.7% of American adults ages 18 to 54, or 5.3 million people, have social phobia in any given year. Social phobia occurs in women twice as often as men, although a higher proportion of men seek help for this disorder. The disorder typically begins in childhood or early adolescence and rarely develops after age 25. Social phobia is often accompanied by depression and may lead to alcohol or other drug abuse.

Mood Disorders: Depression and Mania

Mood disorders, also called affective disorders, create disturbances in a person’s emotional life. Depression, mania, and bipolar disorder are examples of mood disorders. More than 19 million adult Americans will suffer from a depressive illness—major depression, bipolar disorder, or dysthymia—each year. Many of them will be incapacitated for weeks or months because their illness is left untreated.

Nearly twice as many women (12%) as men (7%) are affected by a depressive illness each year. Depression is a frequent and serious complication that follows heart attack, stroke, diabetes, and cancer, but it is very treatable. Further, depression increases the risk of having a heart attack. According to one recent study that covered a 13-year period, individuals with a history of major depression were four times as likely to suffer a heart attack compared with people without such a history. Symptoms of depression may include feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and worthlessness, as well as complaints of physical pain and changes in appetite, sleep patterns, and energy level. In mania, on the other hand, an individual experiences an abnormally elevated mood, often marked by exaggerated self-importance, irritability, agitation, and a decreased need for sleep. In bipolar disorder, also called manic-depressive illness, a person’s mood alternates between extremes of mania and depression. More than 2.3 million Americans ages 18 and over, about 1% of the population, suffer from manic-depressive illness. As many as 20% of people with manic-depressive illness die by suicide. Men and women are equally likely to develop manic-depressive illness.

Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders

People with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders lose contact with reality. Symptoms may include delusions and hallucinations, disorganized thinking and speech, bizarre behavior, a diminished range of emotional responsiveness, and social withdrawal. In addition, people who suffer from these illnesses experience an inability to function in one or more important areas of life, such as social relations, work, or school. More than 2 million adult Americans are affected by schizophrenia. In men, schizophrenia usually appears in the late teens or early twenties. Onset of the disorder in women is usually in their twenties to early thirties. Schizophrenia affects men and women with equal frequency. Most people with schizophrenia suffer chronically throughout their lives. One of every 10 people with schizophrenia eventually commits suicide.

Personality Disorders

Personality disorders are mental illnesses in which one’s personality results in personal distress or a significant impairment in social or work functioning. In general, people with personality disorders have poor perceptions of themselves or others. They may have low self-esteem or overwhelming narcissism, poor impulse control, troubled social relationships, and inappropriate emotional responses. Considerable controversy exists over where to draw the distinction between a normal personality and a personality disorder. In addition, treatment for this disorder is typically long term, though success is not extremely difficult to achieve.

Cognitive and Dissociative Disorders

Cognitive disorders, such as delirium and dementia, involve a significant loss of mental functioning. Dementia, for example, is characterized by impaired memory and difficulties in such functions as speaking, abstract thinking, and the ability to identify familiar objects. The conditions in this category usually result from a medical condition, substance abuse, or adverse reactions to medication or poisonous substances.

Dissociative disorders involve disturbances in a person’s consciousness, memories, identity, and perception of the environment. Dissociative disorders include amnesia that has no physical cause; dissociative identity disorder, in which a person has two or more distinct personalities that alternate in their control of the person’s behavior; depersonalization disorder, characterized by a chronic feeling of being detached from one’s body or mental processes; and dissociative fugue, an episode of sudden departure from home or work with an accompanying loss of memory. In some parts of the world, people experience dissociative states as possession by a god or ghost. In many societies, trance and possession states are normal parts of cultural and religious practices and are not considered dissociative disorders.

Somatoform and Factitious Disorders

Somatoform disorders are characterized by the presence of physical symptoms that cannot be explained by a medical condition or other mental illness. Physicians often conclude that such symptoms result from psychological conflicts or distress. In conversion disorder, also called hysteria, a person may experience blindness, deafness, or seizures, yet a physician can find nothing wrong with the person. People with another somatoform disorder, hypochondriasis, constantly fear that they will develop a serious disease and misinterpret minor physical symptoms as evidence of illness.

In contrast to people with somatoform disorders, people with factitious disorders intentionally produce or fake physical or psychological symptoms in order to receive medical attention and care. For example, an individual might falsely report shortness of breath to gain admittance to a hospital, report thoughts of suicide to solicit attention, or fabricate blood in the urine or the symptoms of rash so as to appear ill.

Substance-Related Disorders

Substance-related disorders result from the abuse of drugs, side effects of medications, or exposure to toxic substances. These disorders are regarded as behavioral or addictive disorders rather than as mental illnesses, although substance-related disorders commonly occur in people with mental illnesses. Common substance-related disorders include alcoholism and other forms of drug dependence. Drug use can contribute to symptoms of other mental disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and psychosis. Drugs associated with substance-related disorders include alcohol, caffeine, nicotine, cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, hallucinogens, and sedatives.

Eating Disorders

Eating disorders are conditions in which an individual experiences severe disturbances in eating behaviors. People with anorexia nervosa have an intense fear of gaining weight and refuse to eat adequately or to maintain a normal body weight. People with bulimia nervosa repeatedly engage in episodes of binge eating, usually followed by self-induced vomiting or the use of laxatives, diuretics, or other medications to prevent weight gain. Eating disorders occur mostly among young women in Western societies and certain parts of Asia.

Impulse Control Disorders

People with impulse control disorders cannot control an impulse to engage in harmful behaviors such as explosive anger, stealing (kleptomania), setting fires (pyromania), gambling, or pulling out their own hair (trichotillomania). Some mental illnesses such as mania, schizophrenia, and antisocial personality disorder may include symptoms of impulsive behavior.

Psychological Changes in the Maxillofacial Patient

Maxillofacial patients are often classified by the etiology of their diagnosis, which is usually divided into three categories: acquired, congenital, and developmental defects. A certain percentage of maxillofacial patients, in addition to having a maxillofacial defect, may have had pre-existing psychological impairments that may further confound their treatment. Others may have been psychologically stable before the event that created the “loss” but afterward experience some measure of psychological instability.

Acquired Defects

Patients with acquired maxillofacial defects have had ablative cancer surgery or severe trauma. These two groups are similar in that in both situations a person who had relatively normal anatomy and physiologic function subsequently lost them overnight. Cancer patients differ from trauma patients, however, in some important ways. The cancer patient may express “why me?” and is often faced with the possibility of recurrence, more surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and the futility of the process. Patients with smaller defects frequently will be more demanding and have higher expectations than patients with larger, more debilitating defects. The trauma patient is usually younger than the cancer patient, particularly if the trauma is self-inflicted. It is remarkable when treating near-suicides to note that their demeanor often appears relatively, but superficially, upbeat. Additionally, with the self-inflicted trauma patient, there is a la belle indifférence demeanor when confronted with the upward struggle of multiple, difficult surgical procedures to restore the patient’s face.

Congenital Defects

Those patients with maxillofacial birth defects intuitively understand that they are different from the norm and may believe that they are genetically damaged or subhuman. They may not fit in with their peer or age groups. They face the knowledge that there may be a genetic predisposition to recurring incidence in their own progeny. Parents may have difficulty in accepting their child or may blame themselves for the birth defect, resulting in family dysfunction and loss of family unity. Congenital maxillofacial patients usually face multiple and sequential surgeries, orthodontics, and prosthetic procedures over several years in an attempt to correct their defects. In cleft lip and palate patients one would expect some variation, as the defect may range from a simple cleft lip with minor loss of function to bilateral cleft lip and palate with severe impairment in swallowing, speech, and facial esthetics. Craniofacial anomaly patients are at risk for learning disorders and for internalizing and externalizing behavior problems.

Developmental Defects

Anomalies in growth and development may not be readily apparent at first in the developmental defect patient but will ultimately become so. The developmental defect patient may display emotional responses similar to the patient with congenital defects. Because the developmental defect patient is one in whom the defect becomes apparent over time, the patient may or may not learn to deal with the evolving process.

Loss and Grief in Maxillofacial Defects

Once patients realize they have cancer, or have experienced some other debilitating crisis creating a loss, they will perceive it as both an immediate and future loss. This loss may manifest itself in the form of anxiety, depression, or a posttraumatic stress disorder. In any event, a cycle of loss, grief, and reintegration must be completed by the patient and understood by the prosthodontist.

Loss

Loss has been defined as “a state of being deprived of or being without something one has had and valued” (Peretz, 1970). The loss of a facial feature or other body part due to cancer can be one of the most painful experiences in life. This loss includes not only the deprivation of the feature, but also subsequent deprivation of some life experiences. Patients will be subject to possible rejection by their spouses, friends, business associates, and their community. In addition, the loss of a maxillofacial feature may mean a loss of status in social groups or in one’s career. If patients cannot develop successful psychological and physical coping skills, they may experience severe psychological trauma, even if the loss appears minimal.

Peretz (1970) divides loss into four categories: loss of a significant person, loss of a part of the self, loss of material objects, and developmental loss. The meaning of the loss depends on the one who feels the effect. Loss can threaten the integrity of one’s self-esteem, which will remain easily damaged for some time after the fact. Even the threat of loss can be emotionally devastating. It can trigger the fear of death at the deepest level.

Grief

Stages of the grief process include:

•     Shock and denial. Changes occur in sleeping and eating, often symptomatic of depression. The past is idealized. Patients are at risk for suicide if their depression is severe.

•     Guilt, anger, and a search to find ways to discharge the emotional pain. The feeling of anger at this stage is really secondary to the driving feeling of fear of the unknown and unfamiliar. The patient may be subject to possible substance abuse.

•     Adjustment, acceptance, and growth. The patient comes to realize that the past had its faults and the future may not be so bad. This stage signals acceptance of the loss, healthy adjustment, and new life patterns. Integration of the prosthesis is possible.

The reaction of grief is an adaptive function “to assure group cohesiveness in species where a social form of existence is necessary for survival” (Averill, 1975). Unfortunately, because our society emphasizes competency, adequacy, and strength, this often prevents patients from sharing their feelings.

Prosthodontists will do well to recognize their own past losses and grief and refer patients who need validation to trained helping professionals. In most cases, the prosthodontist will not have had to experience the same level of loss as the patient, but remembering losses of loved ones, friends, and property will help the practitioner to be empathetic with the patient and to be in a better position from which to gauge the patient’s psychological progress. Consequently, this empathy will assist the prosthodontist in making a decision regarding a referral to a psychotherapist. At the same time the prosthodontist will need to be wary of any unresolved grief that may be triggered in response to the patient’s grief experience.

Regardless of how effectively grieving is done, it cannot be rushed. Grieving requires time out from routine living and often makes the one grieving appear disturbed. Improper recognition of this can cause prosthodontists to misinterpret behavior and add confusion to the suffering. This can create a lack of self-confidence in patients, weaken their sense of self, bring despair, or trigger self-destructive behavior. Grief is the opposite of what is considered to be mental health—the ability to cope, to love, and to work. Grief can cause physical illness, poor judgment, weakened inhibition, clouded intellect, and blurred perception. Patients who experience traumatic losses will experience great ambivalence between wanting to be alone and wanting companionship. They will also struggle with wanting to be active and passive, dependent and independent, exploitive and helpless. Grief is so overwhelming that it has often been viewed as an illness that may end in only partial recovery. This partial recovery, or unresolved grief, can be triggered, even after a significant amount of time following the initial loss, by other losses or become the impetus for a range of physical or mental disorders. Therapy for children in such cases is strongly indicated. Children often grieve their losses openly, and a dominant emotion for children toward a loss is anger. Due to their egocentricity, children can often blame themselves for losses and feel guilty. Improperly discharged, guilt and anger can set the stage for later emotional difficulties as adolescents and adults.

Impact of Psychological Impairments

The maxillofacial patient’s quality of life is obviously impacted, which predisposes him or her to a variety of psychological impairments. Recent studies into the quality of life (QOL) of patients afflicted with a variety of disease processes have been performed (Guyatt et al, 1993; Chandra et al, 1998). QOL surveys may be used to measure cross-sectional differences in the quality of life between patients at a point in time or longitudinal changes within patients over a period of time. The American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics is currently investigating the quality of life of the maxillofacial patient. Interestingly, preliminary results reveal that patients’ perspectives on their quality of life may be significantly different from what the prosthodontist believes is important. While the health care provider may focus on the precision of the treatment, the patient may be more interested in acceptance and re-integration into society. Further research in this emerging area is forthcoming.

Psychometric testing may be considered, including the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Cornell Medical Index, Eysenck Personality Inventory, and Social Adjustment Rating Scale, but the administration may best be left to those who use psychometric instruments on a daily basis (Laney and Gibilisco, 1983). Patients will inquire as to the interpretation of the inventory instruments and demand an explanation of the results. The prosthodontist may sense by the patient’s presentation (attitude, demeanor, appearance, emotional state, mood, manner of speech, and cognitive processes) the nature of the psychological impairment and then make the appropriate referral for definitive evaluation using the methods described later in this chapter.

The disorders mentioned earlier will have varying effects on the patient’s ability to withstand surgical procedures or to accept prostheses. It should also be noted that the degree of severity of the disorder may also be a factor in the patient’s successful treatment. The practitioner would be well advised to consult with a social worker, psychologist, or psychiatrist as a part of the treatment team to aid in preparing a plan that will achieve the desired goal of the patient.

Without a complete assessment of the patient it is difficult to project the reaction that a patient might have to the surgical procedure or the placement of a prosthesis. However, understanding the disorders and their symptoms will aid the practitioner in anticipating various kinds of behaviors. It should be strongly noted that the quality and content of the communication between the prosthodontist and the patient significantly affects the patient’s ability to accept the prosthesis and the successful outcome of the treatment plan.

Clinician Referral

Family Support

Family support and patient-centered treatment involve knowing how to enlist the support of the patient’s family and significant others in the treatment and aftercare process. Support from family and friends can be a great help in coping with trauma. Patients may feel isolated and lonely. Connections with other people who care and try to understand can help the patient overcome this isolation. Treatment professionals can support this process by encouraging families to learn about the trauma, the prosthesis, and how to help their family member. Family support usually has a positive impact on an individual recovering from such experiences.

This connection between individuals with cancer, or other trauma, and their families is often overlooked in treatment. Medical treatments focus on helping the individual to battle the disease, while psychological treatments focus on helping the individual handle emotional distress. Family therapists understand that families are groups just like other groups in society in that they operate according to certain rules, have certain values and beliefs, and have certain ways of communicating with each other. Families need to achieve a state of homeostatic balance to succeed and progress.

After a diagnosis of cancer or the realization of the degree of the maxillofacial trauma, the structure of the family can be greatly changed. Communication patterns can be disrupted. People may be afraid to say things to each other in the same way they did before. The balance of power in the family can be affected. Family therapy by a trained professional can help the patient and family regain their homeostasis in the wake of maxillofacial surgery or trauma. A practitioner should be supportive of the family that surrounds the patient and should provide them with as much education as possible. Referral to a trained family therapist is appropriate if one suspects that their homeostatic balance is being jeopardized. Above all, listen to the patient.

Patient-Centered Treatment Planning

Patient-centered planning is not a new concept in the social sciences; however, it is antithetical to treatment plans that are composed without the expressed wishes and input of the patient and family. It is widely accepted that patients’ problems can be impacted positively by their family, their community, and other clinics/agencies with which they are involved. A priori concepts in patient-centered planning dictate that the individual will direct the planning process with a focus on what he or she wants and needs. Professional staff will play a role in the planning and delivery of treatment and may play a role in the planning and delivery of supports. Care strategies play an important role in planning for and delivery of supports, services, and treatment. Patient-centered planning fits well with these strategies. Both strategies attempt to ensure that individuals are provided with the most appropriate services necessary to achieve the desired outcomes. Patient-centered planning is a highly individualized process designed to respond to the expressed needs and desires of the individual. Each individual has strengths and the ability to express preferences and to make choices. The individual’s choices and preferences should always be considered, if not always granted. Treatment and supports identified through the process should be provided in environments that promote maximum independence, community connections, and quality of life. A person’s cultural background must be recognized and valued in the decision-making process.

Mental Health Services

Before consulting or referring a patient to mental health professionals, practitioners must know if their patient is at a stage of acceptance of their maxillofacial deficiencies to accept referrals. If this is not the case, any referral will be met with immediate rejection and a positive outcome of the prosthetic procedure will be doubtful.

There are different disciplines that play a role in mental health services. Social workers are trained to provide psychotherapeutic or case management services to the patient. They may differ in their views from psychologists in that their view of the client involves the client’s family and environment and will typically involve these areas in treatment planning. Psychologists may be more psychodynamic or individually focused than social workers. Psychiatrists are specialized physicians and are the only mental health practitioners who can prescribe medication.

There are different levels of care in mental health to which to refer patients. Each level increases the level of restriction to the patient. While the field of mental health is continually changing, Table 1-1 may provide the practitioner with a basic understanding of interventions that are available to the patient.

Table 1-1 Levels of Care

Support groups

Groups for patients or their families typically facilitated by other patients who are familiar with the trauma or problem. The goal of this intervention is to provide support to the group member experiencing the trauma.

Educational groups

Groups for patients or their families used to educate on the trauma or problem area, facilitated by a trained professional. The goal of this intervention is to educate; it is not intended for treatment.

Outpatient therapy

Psychotherapy for individuals and their families with a goal of decreasing symptoms and coping with life changes. This intervention is provided by trained professionals in their offices over a regular schedule of appointments.

Home-based treatment

Psychotherapy for chronic individuals and their families with a goal of decreasing symptoms and coping with life changes. This intervention is provided by trained professionals in the homes and community of the client at any time, including 24-hour emergency care. In this approach, other professionals and disciplines work together to provide the treatment.

Day treatment

Daily psychotherapeutic treatment in an educational setting with all disciplines involved. This level of care is designed for those chronic individuals who need continual availability to therapists and doctors but may also benefit from skill development.

Partial hospitalization

Daily psychotherapy within a hospital setting for those chronic individuals who need daily supervision by therapists and doctors but can be successful in returning home in the evening.

Inpatient hospitalization

Psychiatric hospitalization for those individuals who are in danger of hurting themselves or others.

Patient Support Groups

Practitioners may, as part of the course of treatment, include a referral to a support group for the patient and/or the family. These groups can aid in patients’ acceptance of their afflictions and treatments. Consequently, this acceptance will aid in a positive prognosis and outcome of the treatment intervention. Some support groups include:

•     About Face, an international organization that provides emotional support and information to individuals who have facial differences and their families. About Face is recognized by the Cleft Palate Foundation of the American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association as the leading support organization for individuals and families whose lives are affected by facial difference. About Face can be reached at 99 Crowns Lane, 4th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M6H 3M8, Canada, or phoned at 800-665-FACE.

•     Support for People with Oral and Head and Neck Cancer, Inc., a patient-directed self-help organization dedicated to meeting the needs of oral and head and neck surgery and cancer patients. They can be reached at PO Box 53, Locust Valley, NY 11560–0053, or phoned at 516-759-5333.

•     Let’s Face It, an information and support network for people with facial difference, their families, friends, and professionals. They publish an annual 50-page booklet with more than 150 resources for people with facial disfigurement. They can be reached at Box 29972, Bellingham, WA 98228–1972, or phoned at 360-676-7325.

Illustrative Patient Histories

Three patients were interviewed to illustrate several key points and concepts.

Patient 1: AB

AB is a female Caucasian, age 13, who was diagnosed with a right pterygopalatine parameningeal embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma at age 3 ½. Initially, pediatricians diagnosed her as having the mumps. However, the increase in swelling motivated her mother to obtain additional assessments at a local children’s hospital. The patient received 6,300 CGy of radiation therapy and 2 ½ years of chemo-therapy. She is now cancer free. As a result of her treatment, the maxillary and mandibular growth centers were interrupted. Additional findings were partial anodontia, unerupted teeth, and morphogenic changes in the dentition as well as velopharyngeal incompetency. Growth hormone treatment was carried out from 1994 to1999. Currently she is edentulous in the maxillary arch and has three remaining teeth in the mandibular arch. There is an obvious disproportionate facial relationship.

The patient does not remember anything other than having a growth problem. She was very alert during the interview and polite, answering questions when asked and sometimes spontaneously adding to her mother’s answers. The patient was smiling and appeared positive during the interview. She is in the eighth grade and enjoys playing basketball for her church, dancing, and watching television. When asked about the number of friends she has, she reported “about 20.” Upon further probing, she said that she has four or five close friends to whom she can tell confidential things. When asked to describe her current quality of life on a scale of 1 to 10, she answered 9. Discussing her rating further, she explained that “10 is perfect and nobody’s perfect.” This assertion did not appear to be a defensive mechanism. The patient was rather positive and forthright with the answer and perhaps revealed a way for her to cope with her illness. The patient is anticipating looking different, talking differently, and eating faster with her new prosthesis. She recommends that physicians use listening and empathy with their patients to really understand what they are experiencing.

She denied any depression recently or in the past. Her mother reported how the family had to reorganize around her daughter’s illness and treatments, but they did not react negatively to the reorganization. The patient felt that she got through the illness and the treatments because of the support of her family. Her mother felt that she personally got through this event with the support of her family and the support of the other parents with children in similar trauma. There were some tears in her eyes when she talked about this support. It was quite evident that family and peer support was a critical factor in the positive way the patient was getting through the ordeal. The patient’s mother was instrumental in establishing annual supportive events for the families and children receiving the treatment within the same clinic as her daughter. In addition, the mother noted the importance of taking time for short vacations with her husband to re-energize. She reports taking each day as it comes.

Patient 2: JP

JP is a female Caucasian, age 25, born with an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the midface. The malformation developed over time resulting in the vessels and capillaries enlarging in her brain and face and creating a life-threatening situation. Her series of coagulotherapy and surgeries began as a late teen. As a result of ablative surgeries, the patient lost her cheek, nose, maxilla, right orbital floor, and malar process. The inoperable intracranial AVM remains and poses an impending fatal outcome. Besides the obvious loss of facial esthetics there was an inability to masticate, swallow, or articulate speech. Lack of saliva and mucous control created further difficulties for her socially. The patient entered into a deep depression following surgery. After this time she attempted to carry on as normal a routine as possible despite the medical appointments. Maxillofacial prosthetic treatment included the construction of a maxillary obturator and an implant-retained facial prosthesis.

When she was told of the terminal nature of her illness at age 16, JP did not believe it and did not want to accept the illness. She experienced major depression and subsequent depressive neurosis, which lasted for 6 years with many of the classic features described earlier. She had suicidal ideation but did not consider suicide an option, largely due to her religious convictions and the support from her friends. She finally accepted her illness and her subsequent treatment.

JP is the oldest of three siblings in her family. She reported that her father was an alcoholic, perhaps as a way to cope with JP’s illness, and that her family was very dysfunctional. Her parents divorced in 1982 when she was 8 years old. Both of her parents blamed themselves for JP’s illness and expressed anger about this guilt, often toward their daughter in both psychological and physical ways. Her mother “lost her grip on reality” and began to physically abuse her, ultimately kicking JP out of the home at 18 years of age. JP eventually moved in with a friend of her mother’s and was planning a move to her own apartment at the time of this interview. Her relationship with her mother has since improved.

Despite these difficulties, JP is currently attending a local community college studying drama, literature, and computers. She professed a desire to be a spokesperson for her illness. She walks 30 to 60 minutes a day and reports that she has many friends and is active in her church. She rates her quality of life as very high at this time, anticipating improvements that are being made to her prosthesis. She reported that her religious faith has helped her and she relies on this faith to carry her through each step in the process of her treatment. It should be noted that JP credited the empathy and understanding of the practitioners who treated her as a significant factor in her treatment. She is very positive about her immediate prognosis, despite the terminal nature of her illness. In fact, she has more drive and zeal for life than many other people without maxillofacial defects.

Patient 3: JF

JF is a male Caucasian in his early 60s with a diagnosis of a squamous cell carcinoma of the right sinus and maxilla. The ablative surgery resulted in the removal of the eye, orbital contents, and right maxilla. Additionally, a full course of external-beam radiation was administered. Xerostomia and trismus were confounding problems in the treatment. Facial esthetics were compromised and there was an inability to masticate, swallow, or articulate speech. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was scheduled in an attempt to improve the outcome of his bone grafting and implant placement in the remaining maxilla, the mandible, and the orbital regions. Maxillofacial prosthetic treatment included a fixed implant prosthesis for the mandibular arch, an implant-retained and supported maxillary obturator, and an orbital prosthesis affixed to craniofacial implants.

It was clear in this interview that JF was thoroughly educated about his illness. JF credits his religious faith and the support of friends and family with helping him cope with his illness and recovery. He related information about his grandmother who had contracted polio at age 3. She got married, had two children, and was able to complete housekeeping responsibilities. Her positive state of mind had helped her cope and she had not felt that she was handicapped.

JF was very upbeat during the interview and told several humorous stories about life with his prosthesis, indicating a high level of acceptance. He reports going through all of the stages of loss and grief when he learned of his illness and subsequent surgery. In fact, when he arrived at the acceptance stage, after a short depression of about a week, he decided to “beat this thing” and reports being the one who motivated his family to this stage as well.

JF reports that during the surgery to remove the cancer, it did not appear to him that his doctors understood the value of educating the patient as to what to expect. When his hard palate was removed, the patient could not communicate or eat and could only open his mouth 10 mm. He had difficulty finding things to eat, lost weight, and rated his quality of life at that time as a 2 out of 10. He credits his will to live, learned from his parents, and his faith in God as motivational forces that helped him through that difficult time.

His maxillofacial treatment allows JF to drive his car, cut his grass, and travel often. He reports that he can eat a wide variety of items and has a satisfying social life. JF advises practitioners to educate and listen to their patients. In addition, he recommends support groups for all similar patients and their families.

Review and Conclusions

Some of the factors leading to the positive outlook of the patients described include their available positive role models and their spirituality. It must be stated that psychological health and spiritual well-being are integrated and related states. In addition, the traumatic event itself could aid in improving a patient’s outlook on life. Many mental health practitioners are learning that loss will often build strength of character. There are numerous studies that demonstrate how people believe they benefit from extremely difficult life experiences (McMillen et al, 1997, 1999). High rates of benefit after adversity were found among cancer survivors (Curbow et al, 1993) despite the negative effects of treatment. Benefits of adversity to trauma patients include changed life priorities, increased sense of self-efficacy, enhanced sensitivity to others, improved personal relationships, and increased spirituality.

However, maxillofacial patients will not see the benefits of adversity until they are able to attach a meaning to the adverse event. Once a patient is able to apply a meaning to the life-threatening traumatic event, the introduction of benefit-related concepts can be attempted and discussed. This is a technique used in psychotherapy called reframing, where an event is relabeled to search for the positive aspects in relation to the patient’s strengths and abilities to face serious problems. If this can be achieved, the patient can begin to be urged to think about ways that they have benefited, making the traumatic event seem more palatable and easier to think about and cognitively process. Positive outcomes of prosthetic treatment would be anticipated at this point because patients have stopped seeing themselves as victims and, instead, as capable human beings. The patients interviewed were able to find meaning in their traumatic losses, either through their developmental history or through their own spirituality.

Patients do not want an insulated attitude of caregiving developed from treatment outcomes that may fall short of the intended result or an indifferent attitude created by the frequent loss of patients to death. These attitudes will result in stunted improvement by the patient. Rather, patients want health care providers who exhibit empathy and who can present genuine emotions. In addition, prosthodontists who can learn to actively listen to patients, communicating to them an understanding of their feelings and desires for their treatment plans, will aid in positive results in the management of their patients.

References

Averill J. Grief: Its nature and significance. In: Carr A, et al (eds). Grief: Selected Readings. New York: Health Sciences Publishing Corp, 1975:232.

Chandra P, Chaturvedi S, Channabasavanna S, Anantha A, Reddy B, Sharma R. Psychological well-being among cancer patients receiving radiation: A prospective study. Qual Life Res 1998;7:495.

Curbow B, Sommerfield M, Baker F, Wingard J, Legro M. Personal changes, dispositional optimism, and psychological adjustment to bone marrow transplantation. J Behav Med 1993;16:423.

Gillis R. Psychological implications of patient care. In: Laney W (ed). Maxillofacial Prosthetics. Littleton, MA: PSG Publishing Co, 1979: Chapter 2.

Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:622.

House M. Full denture technique. In: Classic Prosthodontic Articles, vol. 3. Chicago: American College of Prosthodontists, 1978: Chapter 1.

Laney W, Gibilisco J. Management of craniofacial pain. In: Diagnosis and Treatment in Prosthodontics. Philadelphia: Lea   Febiger, 1983: Chapter 6.

McMillen J. Better for it: How people benefit from adversity. Soc Work 1999;44(5):455.

McMillen J, Smith E, Fisher R. Perceived benefit and mental health after three types of disaster. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997;65:733.

Peretz D. Development, object-relationships, and loss. In: Schoenberg B, et al (eds). Loss and Grief: Psychological Management in Medical Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970:3–19.

Maxillofacial prosthetic services should be a covered benefit under medical policies if the patient has medical insurance. The moxst common types of patients requiring maxillofacial prosthetic services are patients with congenital defects (eg, cleft palates), acquired defects, compromised function (eg, caused by cancer or stroke), and severe trauma (eg, the result of automobile accidents or gun shot wounds). It is imperative that patients’ medical providers and insurance companies understand the medical necessity of prosthetic treatment so that patients can receive their rightful medical insurance benefits. A patient can then be rehabilitated to the optimal level and become a productive member of society. However, insurance coverage is often incorrectly denied due to the lack of education and understanding by all parties.

This chapter provides information on the basic types of insurance coverages and explains methods to obtain insurance reimbursement so that cost-effective treatment can be optimally provided. In most practices a small percentage of patients require maxillofacial prosthetic services. Moreover, if providers are not paid fairly or in a timely manner, they will likely redirect their practices to more traditional prosthetic services such as fixed, removable, and implant prosthetics. This results in decreased access or unavailability of maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation services. It also results in increased patient suffering and increased insurance costs to third-party carriers and government agencies that provide medical benefits under programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. The loss of access to maxillofacial prosthetic services will reduce the patient’s ability to return to society in a functional and acceptable condition.

Resource-Based Relative Value System

In recent years there has been a shift in methods used to determine levels of reimbursement away from a fee-based system to the resource-based relative value scales (RBRVS) system. The RBRVS system attempts to compare and quantify different services in different specialties in an attempt to better equalize reimbursement levels across all specialties. There are three components used to determine these values. The first is the physician work component. To arrive at the work relative value unit (RVU), time spent with the patient, intensity of the work, and risk and difficulty of the procedure are factors that are considered. The other two components are practice expense (PE) and malpractice expense (ME). The reimbursement level is determined by adding these three value units together and applying a conversion factor (CF):