Early Bardic Literature
Early Bardic LiteratureEarly Bardic LiteratureCopyright
Early Bardic Literature
Standish O'Grady
Early Bardic Literature
Scattered over the surface of every country in Europe may be
found sepulchral monuments, the remains of pre-historic times and
nations, and of a phase of life will civilisation which has long
since passed away. No country in Europe is without its cromlechs
and dolmens, huge earthen tumuli, great flagged sepulchres, and
enclosures of tall pillar-stones. The men by whom these works were
made, so interesting in themselves, and so different from anything
of the kind erected since, were not strangers and aliens, but our
own ancestors, and out of their rude civilisation our own has
slowly grown. Of that elder phase of European civilisation no
record or tradition has been anywhere bequeathed to us. Of its
nature, and the ideas and sentiments whereby it was sustained,
nought may now be learned save by an examination of those tombs
themselves, and of the dumb remnants, from time to time exhumed out
of their soil—rude instruments of clay, flint, brass, and gold, and
by speculations and reasonings founded upon these archaeological
gleanings, meagre and sapless.For after the explorer has broken up, certainly desecrated,
and perhaps destroyed, those noble sepulchral raths; after he has
disinterred the bones laid there once by pious hands, and the urn
with its unrecognisable ashes of king or warrior, and by the
industrious labour of years hoarded his fruitless treasure of stone
celt and arrow-head, of brazen sword and gold fibula and torque;
and after the savant has rammed many skulls with sawdust, measuring
their capacity, and has adorned them with some obscure label, and
has tabulated and arranged the implements and decorations of flint
and metal in the glazed cases of the cold gaunt museum, the
imagination, unsatisfied and revolted, shrinks back from all that
he has done. Still we continue to inquire, receiving from him no
adequate response, Who were those ancient chieftains and warriors
for whom an affectionate people raised those strange tombs? What
life did they lead? What deeds perform? How did their personality
affect the minds of their people and posterity? How did our
ancestors look upon those great tombs, certainly not reared to be
forgotten, and how did they—those huge monumental pebbles and
swelling raths—enter into and affect the civilisation or religion
of the times?We see the cromlech with its massive slab and immense
supporting pillars, but we vainly endeavour to imagine for whom it
was first erected, and how that greater than cyclopean house
affected the minds of those who made it, or those who were reared
in its neighbourhood or within reach of its influence. We see the
stone cist with its great smooth flags, the rocky cairn, and huge
barrow and massive walled cathair, but the interest which they
invariably excite is only aroused to subside again unsatisfied.
From this department of European antiquities the historian retires
baffled, and the dry savant is alone master of the field, but a
field which, as cultivated by him alone, remains barren or fertile
only in things the reverse of exhilarating. An antiquarian museum
is more melancholy than a tomb.But there is one country in Europe in which, by virtue of a
marvellous strength and tenacity of the historical intellect, and
of filial devotedness to the memory of their ancestors, there have
been preserved down into the early phases of mediaeval
civilisation, and then committed to the sure guardianship of
manuscript, the hymns, ballads, stories, and chronicles, the names,
pedigrees, achievements, and even characters, of those ancient
kings and warriors over whom those massive cromlechs were erected
and great cairns piled. There is not a conspicuous sepulchral
monument in Ireland, the traditional history of which is not
recorded in our ancient literature, and of the heroes in whose
honour they were raised. In the rest of Europe there is not a
single barrow, dolmen, or cist of which the ancient traditional
history is recorded; in Ireland there is hardly one of which it is
not. And these histories are in many cases as rich and
circumstantial as that of men of the greatest eminence who have
lived in modern times. Granted that the imagination which for
centuries followed with eager interest the lives of these heroes,
beheld as gigantic what was not so, as romantic and heroic what was
neither one nor the other, still the great fact remains, that it
was beside and in connection with the mounds and cairns that this
history was elaborated, and elaborated concerning them and
concerning the heroes to whom they were sacred.On the plain of Tara, beside the little stream Nemanna,
itself famous as that which first turned a mill-wheel in Ireland,
there lies a barrow, not itself very conspicuous in the midst of
others, all named and illustrious in the ancient literature of the
country. The ancient hero there interred is to the student of the
Irish bardic literature a figure as familiar and clearly seen as
any personage in the Biographia Britannica. We know the name he
bore as a boy and the name he bore as a man. We know the names of
his father and his grandfather, and of the father of his
grandfather, of his mother, and the father and mother of his
mother, and the pedigrees and histories of each of these. We know
the name of his nurse, and of his children, and of his wife, and
the character of his wife, and of the father and mother of his
wife, and where they lived and were buried. We know all the
striking events of his boyhood and manhood, the names of his horses
and his weapons, his own character and his friends, male and
female. We know his battles, and the names of those whom he slew in
battle, and how he was himself slain, and by whose hands. We know
his physical and spiritual characteristics, the device upon his
shield, and how that was originated, carved, and painted, by whom.
We know the colour of his hair, the date of his birth and of his
death, and his relations, in time and otherwise, with the remainder
of the princes and warriors with whom, in that mound-raising period
of our history, he was connected, in hostility or friendship; and
all this enshrined in ancient song, the transmitted traditions of
the people who raised that barrow, and who laid within it sorrowing
their brave ruler and, defender. That mound is the tomb of
Cuculain, once king of the district in which Dundalk stands to-day,
and the ruins of whose earthen fortification may still be seen two
miles from that town.This is a single instance, and used merely as an example, but
one out of a multitude almost as striking. There is not a king of
Ireland, described as such in the ancient annals, whose barrow is
not mentioned in these or other compositions, and every one of
which may at the present day be identified where the ignorant
plebeian or the ignorant patrician has not destroyed them. The
early History of Ireland clings around and grows out of the Irish
barrows until, with almost the universality of that primeval forest
from which Ireland took one of its ancient names, the whole isle
and all within it was clothed with a nobler raiment, invisible, but
not the less real, of a full and luxuriant history, from whose
presence, all-embracing, no part was free. Of the many poetical and
rhetorical titles lavished upon this country, none is truer than
that which calls her the Isle of Song. Her ancient history passed
unceasingly into the realm of artistic representation; the history
of one generation became the poetry of the next, until the whole
island was illuminated and coloured by the poetry of the bards.
Productions of mere fancy and imagination these songs are not,
though fancy and imagination may have coloured and shaped all their
subject-matter, but the names are names of men and women who once
lived and died in Ireland, and over whom their people raised the
swelling rath and reared the rocky cromlech. In the sepulchral
monuments their names were preserved, and in the performance of
sacred rites, and the holding of games, fairs, and assemblies in
their honour, the memory of their achievements kept fresh, till the
traditions that clung around these places were inshrined in tales
which were finally incorporated in the Leabhar na Huidhré and the
Book of Leinster.Pre-historic narrative is of two kinds—in one the imagination
is at work consciously, in the other unconsciously. Legends of the
former class are the product of a lettered and learned age. The
story floats loosely in a world of imagination. The other sort of
pre-historic narrative clings close to the soil, and to visible and
tangible objects. It may be legend, but it is legend believed in as
history never consciously invented, and growing out of certain
spots of the earth's surface, and supported by and drawing its life
from the soil like a natural growth.Such are the early Irish tales that cling around the mounds
and cromlechs as that by which they are sustained, which was
originally their source, and sustained them afterwards in a strong
enduring life. It is evident that these cannot be classed with
stories that float vaguely in an ideal world, which may happen in
one place as well as another, and in which the names might be
disarrayed without changing the character and consistency of the
tale, and its relations, in time or otherwise, with other
tales.Foreigners are surprised to find the Irish claim for their
own country an antiquity and a history prior to that of the
neighbouring countries. Herein lie the proof and the explanation.
The traditions and history of the mound-raising period have in
other countries passed away. Foreign conquest, or less intrinsic
force of imagination, and pious sentiment have suffered them to
fall into oblivion; but in Ireland they have been all preserved in
their original fulness and vigour, hardly a hue has faded, hardly a
minute circumstance or articulation been suffered to
decay.