26,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Serie: Blackwell Public Philosophy Series
- Sprache: Englisch
"Elliott and Spence have produced a tight, teachable, and timely primer on media ethics for users and creators of information in the digital age. Pitched at just the right depth of detail to provide a big picture contextualization of changing media practices grounded in concerns for democracy and the public good, the book explores and reflects the implications of the convergence of the Fourth and Fifth Estates with an open-access, hyper-linked architecture which invites self-reflective practice on the part of its users”
Philip Gordon, Utah Valley University
2019 PROSE Award Finalist in the Media & Cultural Studies category!
The rapid and ongoing evolution of digital technologies has transformed the waythe world communicates and digests information. Fueled by a 24-hour news cycleand post-truth politics, media consumption and the technologies that drive ithave become more influential in shaping public opinion, and it has become more imperative than ever to examine their social and ethical consequences. Ethics for a Digital Era provides a penetrating analysis of the ethical issues that have emerged as the digital revolution progresses, including journalistic practices that impact on the truth, reliability, and trustworthiness of communicating information. The volume explores new methods and models for ethical inquiry in a digital world, and maps out guidelines for web-based news producers and users to conceptualize ethical issuesand analyze ethically questionable acts.
In each of three thematic sections, Deni Elliott and Edward H. Spence reflect upon shifts in media ethics as contemporary mass communication combines traditional analog practices with new forms like blogs, vlogs, podcasts, and social media posts, and evolves into an interactive medium with users who both produce and consume the news. Later chapters apply a process of normative decision-making to some of the most important issues which arise in these interactions, and encourage users to bridge their own thinking between the virtual and physical worlds of information and its communication.
Timely and thought-provoking, Ethics for a Digital Era is an invaluable resource for undergraduate and graduate students in media and mass communication, applied ethics, and journalism, as well as general readers interested in the ethical impact of their media consumption.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 342
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017
Ähnliche
Table of Contents
Cover
Title Page
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Part I: From Analog to Digital News
1 A New Paradigm for News
First, Some Definitions
The New World of News Production and Consumption
A Brief History of Journalism Ethics and Paradigm Shifts
Works Cited
2 Legacy News Organizations Move from Analog to Digital
New Ethical Issues for a Virtual Environment
The Reasons That Legacy News Media Endure
Legacy News Media Adaptation to New Technology
Reframing Role‐Related Responsibilities for Digital News
Online Forum or Free‐for‐All
Corrections
Implications of Immortal Stories
Ethical Issues Raised by Financial Changes
Incorporating Ads: Let Me Count the Ways
Project Partnerships and Creative Cost‐Sharing
Come for the Kittens; Stay for the News
New Ethical Imperatives for Online News Sites
Works Cited
3 Intellectual Property and Information Sharing
Copyright Law
Fair Use
Copies in a Digital Age: Traditional Views and Open Access
Aggregation and Plagiarism
Adapting Intellectual Property to the Digital Era
Works Cited
4 Citizen Responsibility in the Digital Era
The Philosophers’ Arguments
Digital Journalism, Audience Fragmentation, and Misperceptions
Ethical News Consumption in a Digital Age
Pseudonymous Engagement as a First Step
Works Cited
Part II: Thinking Through Ethical Issues in Digital Journalism
5 DOIT, A Process for Normative Analysis
The Normative Structure of Information
Information and Universal Rights
The DOIT Model
Global Information Ethics: Cultural Relativism without Moral Relativism
Works Cited
6 Issues in Convergent Journalism
The Fourth Estate
The Convergence of Old and New Media: Five Paradigmatic Cases
The New Journalists of the Fifth Estate?
Works Cited
7 Privacy and Disclosure
Privacy and Confidentiality
The Shifting Boundaries of Privacy
Confidentiality
An Individual’s Right to Nondisclosure
DOIT Analysis of the George Bell Publication
Works Cited
8 Deception in Sourcing and Presentation
The Nature of Deception and Its Justification
What Counts as Deception
Deception Is Ethically Prohibited Unless Justified
Disclosure, Surveillance, and Physical‐World Identity
Drones, Social Media Sourcing, Cyber‐Lurking
Journalistic Disclosure and the Eternal Internet
Applying the DOIT Process to Deception
Works Cited
9 Media Corruption
A Tale of Corruption: The Myth of Gyges
The Characterizing Features of Corruption
Types of Media Corruption
A Detailed Analysis of a Case Study of Media Corruption
Works Cited
Part III: Using the Virtual World to Create a Better Physical World
10 Beyond Ethics
Information, Communication, and Wisdom
Wise after the Fact: A One‐Act Play
Wisdom Deficit in an Age of Information Abundance
The Dual Obligation Information Theory‐Wisdom Model
Communicating Wisely
Works Cited
Epilogue
Works Cited
Index
End User License Agreement
Guide
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Pages
ii
iii
iv
v
viii
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
171
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
Blackwell Public PhilosophyEdited by Michael Boylan, Marymount University
In a world of 24‐hour news cycles and increasingly specialized knowledge, the Blackwell Public Philosophy series takes seriously the idea that there is a need and demand for engaging and thoughtful discussion of topics of broad public importance. Philosophy itself is historically grounded in the public square, bringing people together to try to understand the various issues that shape their lives and give them meaning. This “love of wisdom” – the essence of philosophy – lies at the heart of the series. Written in an accessible, jargon‐free manner by internationally renowned authors, each book is an invitation to the world beyond newsflashes and soundbites and into public wisdom.
Permission to Steal: Revealing the Roots of Corporate Scandal
by Lisa H. Newton
Doubting Darwin? Creationist Designs on Evolution
by Sahotra Sarkar
The Extinction of Desire: A Tale of Enlightenment
by Michael Boylan
Torture and the Ticking Bomb
by Bob Brecher
In Defense of Dolphins: The New Moral Frontier
by Thomas I. White
Terrorism and Counter‐Terrorism: Ethics and Liberal Democracy
by Seumas Miller
Who Owns You? The Corporate Gold Rush to Patent Your Genes
by David Koepsell
Animalkind: What We Owe to Animals
by Jean Kazez
In the Name of God: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Ethics and Violence
by John Teehan
The Secular Outlook: In Defense of Moral and Political Secularism
by Paul Cliteur
Freedom of Religion and the Secular State
by Russell Blackford
As Free and as Just as Possible: The Theory of Marxian Liberalism
by Jeffrey Reiman
Happy‐People‐Pills For All
by Mark Walker
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Dao
by Sam Crane
The Justification of Religious Violence
by Steve Clarke
Who Owns You? Science, Innovation, and the Gene Patent Wars
by David Koepsell
Ethics for a Digital Era
by Deni Elliott and Edward H. Spence
Ethics for a Digital Era
Deni Elliott
Edward H. Spence
This edition first published 2018© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Deni Elliott and Edward H. Spence to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered OfficesJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Office9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data
Names: Elliott, Deni, author. | Spence, Edward, H. 1949– author.Title: Ethics for a digital era / by Deni Elliott, Poynter Jamison Chair in Media Ethics and Press Policy, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, US [and] Edward Howlett Spence, School of Communication and Creative Industries, Charles Sturt University, University of Sydney, Australia, 4TU Centre of Ethics and Technology, Netherlands.Description: First Edition. | Hoboken : Wiley, 2017. | Series: Blackwell public philosophy ; 2357 | Includes bibliographical references and index.Identifiers: LCCN 2017015034 (print) | LCCN 2017028336 (ebook) | ISBN 9781118968895 (pdf) | ISBN 9781118968901 (epub) | ISBN 9781118968918 (cloth) | ISBN 9781118974667 (pbk.)Subjects: LCSH: Journalistic ethics. | Online journalism.Classification: LCC PN4756 (ebook) | LCC PN4756 .E57 2017 (print) | DDC 174/.907–dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017015034
Cover image: © Mina De La O/GettyimagesCover design: Wiley
Deni Elliott: To my mom who raised me brave enough to seek the truth, confident enough to speak my truth, and open minded enough to learn from the truth of others.
Edward H. Spence: To Alper A. Riza, a constant and true friend
Acknowledgments
Deni Elliott: This book is finished with deep appreciation for the University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, for a well‐timed research leave when I needed to complete the manuscript, with appreciation for the stellar copyediting and proofreading skills of Pam Hogle, who helped make a book written by two philosophers accessible to students more used to reading tweets, and with thanks for those who gave me physical and mental space to write while I was incidentally homeless during my leave. Thanks also to Amy Landsverk for keeping my Florida home and life in such good shape in my absence. Thanks to Edward Spence for extreme patience as we worked through these concepts and edits.
Edward H. Spence: I would like to acknowledge the following people all of whom to a greater or smaller degree influenced all my work including the current book: to Plato for his constant inspiration who taught me that ideas are everything; my parents, Tom and Dawn Spence, for the freedom they gave me to explore my own ideas and my uncle Edward Howlett Spence, who taught me the value of loyalty and dedication to a worthwhile cause. Though departed, they are never far; to my dear brother Richard Spence who taught me the singular values of courage, humility and integrity, and to my lifelong companion, Kathryn Spence, for her inspiration, insight and patience; my thanks also to the Arts Faculty at Charles Sturt University for a generous Compact grant that allowed me the time to work on this book; and last but not least, my heartfelt thanks to my gracious friend and colleague, Deni Elliott, for being an inspirational co‐author of this book. Thank you all. !
Introduction
Writing a book on digital journalism ethics that serves the needs of a twenty‐first‐century audience and addresses information communication technologies (ICTs) is as complicated as the topic itself. We know that technology will leap forward between the time this book goes to the publisher and when it becomes available to audience members. Even with annual electronic updates, this book will always be at least one step behind the newest device, app, or trending social media site. However, we also know that the fundamental ethical issues that concern journalists and citizens today, such as practices that impact on the truth, reliability, and trustworthiness of communicating information, will apply regardless of technological change. Citizens’ need for accuracy will remain as important as it is at present.
Audience members, particularly those born after 1980, are used to embracing the newest communication device, technique, trending site, or story and then moving on when better technology comes along. How we communicate now can change as quickly as the content that we communicate. Today’s young adults, who were exposed to communication technologies from the beginning, learned from their early days how to adapt to new devices with new ways to navigate. The logic of software architecture was learned by these users as intuitively as how to crawl and take first steps. As we have written an electronic book discussing electronic matters, we generally refer to those reading this book as users.
The good news about the study of ethics is that thinking about how people should act in regard to each other and how they should use power in a judicious way predates any technology. Most of the important concepts, issues, and processes for analysis have been part of human practice since our ancestors began living in communal groups. The basic formula for reasoning through ethical issues has been part of Western culture for more than 2,000 years. The ancient Greek philosophers, such as Plato and Aristotle, articulated some basic principles for ethics in private, public, and professional life that have been reinterpreted over the years but that form the basic concepts and principles for the analysis that we use through this day. Today, we call the field of study of how ordinary people should make choices about how to act in the world practical ethics. Those basic concepts include the following:
Everyone wishes to avoid basic harms like pain, death, and disability for themselves and for those whom they care about;
If it is irrational to want to be caused a certain harm in a certain circumstance—that is, there is no good reason for someone wanting to be caused that harm—it is unethical to cause that harm to any other human being;
Everyone should be treated justly—they should get what they have a legal right to, what they have an ethical right to, what they deserve, and what they have been promised, and they should not be deprived of what others can get unless there is an ethically relevant justification;
People are ethically required to fulfill their role‐related responsibilities and to do that without causing unjustified harm to anyone;
While people should strive to act in ethically ideal ways by promoting the good and giving extra consideration and care for the most vulnerable, it is ethically required that they do their jobs and do not cause unjustified harm. It is praiseworthy if they act in ethically ideal ways. They are blameworthy if they have failed to meet ethical requirements.
Mass communication ethics, of which digital journalism ethics is a part, has been considered at least since the Greek philosopher Plato wrote the dialogue Gorgias in 400 BCE. Plato noticed that some people have the ability to communicate ideas to others and persuade others to hold particular beliefs. He argued that people with the power to communicate and persuade have the ethical requirement to use that power in a way that promotes the public good and that helps make individuals better people.
In the digital era, we can interpret this ancient directive to mean that those who have the power to communicate with mass audiences—that would be anyone with an Internet connection—should use that power to promote good in individuals and community. As we will explore in this book, open and broad communication of ideas generally promotes the good, as compared with the opposite choice of restricting communication. We discuss in this book what it means to communicate in an ethical and responsible manner.
Journalism, at its essence, is the distribution of information so that citizens can make informed and educated decisions for self‐governance. Journalism tells users what they need to know and think about if they are going to participate in creating a good community or even simply in living their own lives effectively. Acting corruptly may be effective for certain individuals, and engaging in corruption might advance their financial interests, but it does not benefit society on the whole. That is why corruption is both illegal and unethical. Open communication that leads to transparency and accountability allows for corruption to be detected and disclosed.
The ethics of journalism and the ethics of digital communication more generally, both in the creation and consumption of journalism, serve as the core of Ethics for a Digital Era. It is an exciting time to think about journalism ethics and the ethics of digital communication more broadly. The Internet has opened the practice of journalism to everyone with access. There is no topic or opinion or discussion unreachable for the curious user. Every person reading this material electronically literally has the power to change the world. This has resulted in a convergence between journalism ethics and communication ethics more broadly, which extends well beyond the traditional boundaries of journalism as previously conceived and practiced. Users of information can also now be creators and communicators of information. Within a different use of the concept of “convergence,” Wikileaks is a prime example of such a convergence of digital information, a convergence to which we refer in this book, as a convergence of the communication of information between the 4th Estates and 5th Estates.
Writing about ethics is always an exercise of putting old wine in new bottles. The dilemmas that signal the need to think through ethical questions may change as new technological devices are introduced, but the process of human reasoning and the basic ethical responsibilities of competent, rational adults, whom we will refer to as moral agents, remains constant.
Ethics for a Digital Era: Responsible Journalism for Producers and Users must straddle the physical world and the virtual world so that it is useful across platforms. The book contains “old style” in‐text citations and a reference list at the end of each chapter for readers who would like to follow up using that method. It also has live hyperlinks for users who are renting or buying this as an e‐book and who wish to click back to source additional online material. Ethics for a Digital Era, like most contemporary mass communication, must work as a static product but must also be easy to update electronically as new cases, technology, and ideas become available.
We assume that many of this book’s users are digital natives, people who have grown up comfortably living with one foot in the physical world and the other in the virtual world. Google is older than those who were first‐time‐in‐college at the time of this book’s publication. These students have always known a wireless world. Our goal is not to answer all of the ethical questions for journalism in a digital era. Rather, we hope to help users understand ethically relevant aspects of how the practice and products of journalism and the convergent digital media more broadly have changed in the move to the digital era. We provide a method for analyzing issues and demonstrate its use. The questions for reflection at the end of each chapter help users think how they might further apply the topics covered in each chapter. We hope to provide the tools to help users analyze ethical issues in digital journalism and the digital convergent media more generally, wherever they emerge, and we hope to motivate users to use their communication skills to create a better world.
Before proceeding to describe and explain the content of this book a note on methodology. This book comprises three interrelated components: ethical and epistemic theory; application of the theory to digital communication practices; and illustration of how the theory applies to those practices by reference to case studies. The case studies have been chosen diachronically (across time) rather than synchronically (in the present time) on the basis of important general types of illustrative cases. This is for two main reasons.
One reason is to avoid the “currency trap”: that is, that only what happens in the present time is important or relevant. That of course is plainly false as that would make most of our knowledge such as for example, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, and other great scientific inventions and discoveries, irrelevant. Some of the historical case studies referred to in this book are significant because of their impact in shaping the ethics of journalism and the ethics digital communication more broadly, especially with regard the media convergence that we discuss in Chapter 6 and elsewhere in this book.
The second reason is to provide a diachronic spread of case studies that span the development of journalism and digital communication ethics across time, with an emphasis on types of significant cases rather than tokens or instances of those types of cases. Our primary purpose for this is to show how the theoretical approach developed in this book, the Dual Obligation Information Theory (DOIT) introduced in Chapter 5, can apply generally to all such cases both now and in the future. To use a metaphor, our hope is to teach our readers the method for catching fish themselves rather than providing them with the caught fish. We expect readers to do some work on their own to connect cases with our arguments of theory and practice and to find other cases that exemplify the concepts explored.
This brings us to two further methodological design features of this book. The first has to do with our choice of Wikipedia as a primary source for providing links to further information and readings on relevant topics throughout the book; the second methodological feature has to do with the section on Questions for Reflection that we have provided at the end of each chapter of this book.
First, the choice of Wikipedia:
Producing an electronic book with live links is a challenge. Blogs disappear. Content is changed without notice. Archives available today are not available tomorrow. Firewalls block users from accessing primary sources that we used in the process of researching this book. Therefore, many of our hyperlinks take readers to Wikipedia entries. We are confident that this site will be always available and always up‐to‐date. Wikipedia is not the ultimate research tool, but is a good introduction to a topic that always has a list of vetted sources for further exploration.
When Web 2.0 was in its infancy, many scholars did not consider Wikipedia a credible source as they equated Wikipedia with a physical encyclopedia, but one with no expert control. Even the best researched physical encyclopedias were not considered appropriate sources for scholars or for college students to use as authoritative sources, because encyclopedias simply summarized topics rather than providing primary source material. By analogy, Wikipedia was a secondary, rather than a primary, source. Crowdsourcing was considered to be no substitute for “the truth.”
In the years since the 2001 creation of Wikipedia, scholars and users have come to recognize that this web site is not a bad, virtual world imitation of a physical encyclopedia. In a 2016 interview on the NPR radio program, On Being, Wikipedia co‐founder Jimmy Wales said that, Wikipedia could boast “15 billion page views a month, 7,000 new articles every day, 80,000 unpaid volunteers worldwide.”
Rather than providing a poor model of a twentieth‐century encyclopedia, Wikipedia entries are fact‐based and evidence‐backed and directly point the user to primary sources. Wikipedia has emerged as a model for sharing knowledge through Internet‐based democratic action. The site is a model for democracy in three ways:
Open access. Wikipedia’s mission statement is, “Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge.” Access to information is as free as access to the air we breathe in the physical world. The goal is to free information from governmental censorship or corporate control.
Difficult dialogues. The structural process of Wikipedia reflects the best of democracy without tyranny of the majority. Every user has the power to create and edit entries on the site. Each creation and edit is reviewed by others. Controversy or disagreement about edits results in dialogue with the shared goal of publishing accurate information. Different perspectives on the same topic can comfortably appear together. Elected administrators have the power to lock sites or block particular users, but all administrative actions are public. Arbitration committees provide binding decisions, including blocking people on both sides of a controversy from contributing to a page.
Seeking truth. Crowdsourcing is not equivalent to everyone’s opinion being equal. Crowdsourcing is way of removing statements of purported fact from the personality of the provider. Others verify the truth of statements or provide evidence to their falsity. The sources upon which statements depend are available at the end of each article.
Second, the choice of Questions for Reflection:
The primary reason for setting questions for reflection is to strongly encourage the readers to reflect for themselves on the relevant ethical and epistemic principles, their application to the relevant issues and practices and the analysis and evaluation of those issues and practices by reference to illustrative case studies that the readers are also invited to search and discover for themselves. As Aristotle, the ancient Greek philosopher would say, ethical learning, in this case, digital ethics as it applies to the media, comes through individual and group reflective practice and not just through the reading of articles and books on the topic. This book therefore encourages constructive self‐learning through self‐ reflection as an effective and efficient way for becoming a reflective media practitioner.
Ethics for a Digital Era is divided into three parts. Part One: From Analog to Digital News which presents the changes related to the move from one‐way to interactive mass communication in which users can be both producer and consumer of news. Chapter 1 addresses the paradigm shift that occurred through the technologically induced communication revolution of the latter twentieth century. Chapter 2 describes how legacy news media have adapted to producing news from a web‐based platform. Chapter 3 discusses how the web‐based platform has created new questions for copyright and how news aggregation has changed news organizations’ ability to protect their intellectual property. Chapter 4 argues that the new opportunities that citizens have for accessing information implies a new level of responsibility for them to engage in active citizenship.
Part Two: Thinking Through Ethical Issues in Digital Journalism and Digital Communication more broadly applies a process of normative decision‐making to some of the most important issues arising in digital communication in its convergent form that now combines traditional modes of media communication, such as journalism, with new forms of communicating information by non‐professional communicators, through the use of blogs, tweets, and other non‐traditional communication platforms.
Chapter 5 will show that information has a dual normative structure that commits all disseminators of information to both epistemological (those that relate to knowledge) and ethical norms (those that relate to moral behavior) that are in principle universal and thus global in application. Based on this dual normative characterization of information, the chapter will seek to demonstrate that: information and, specifically, digital information on the Internet, as a process and product of communication, has an inherent normative structure that commits its producers, disseminators, communicators, and users, everyone in fact that deals with information, to certain mandatory epistemological and ethical commitments; and the negligent or purposeful abuse of information in violation of these commitments is also a violation of universal rights to freedom and well‐being to which all agents are entitled by virtue of being agents (by agent we mean any person engaged in any purposive activity, such as taking a walk, searching the Internet, writing an essay, etc.,). Chapter 6 examines the phenomenon of converging physical‐world static news products with the process‐oriented production of web‐based news, as well as the broader convergence of information between that produced by professional communicators and non‐professional communicators of information. These days, digital information can be created, accessed, disseminated, and used by anyone, anytime, anywhere—worldwide. This change challenges the traditional role and legitimacy of legacy news organizations as the primary and authoritative source of news. This is especially so on matters of public interest. The new world of citizen journalists ranges from the Twitterati to the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
The primary aim of this chapter is to present a conceptual framework that shows how to examine and evaluate the ongoing transformations wrought by the digitalization of journalism and expansion of its communicators. Specifically, we will seek to show how this conceptual framework allows for the examination and evaluation of the ethics of the ongoing convergence of old and new media at the fundamental level of the ethics of information. We will show how this model can be operationalized to evaluate the impact of this convergence and its implications for the social well‐being (the good life) of individuals and society.
Chapter 7 looks at the ethical issues related to individuals’ control over access to themselves or their information. Chapter 8 considers the ethics of information‐gathering in the digital era along with what information news providers have a responsibility to publish. Sometimes withholding information is deceptive; sometimes it is not. Chapter 9 examines and explores the presence of corruption in the media by reference to Plato’s Myth of Gyges, as this has contemporary significance and relevance in explaining corruption in the media. The primary objective of this chapter is to identify and categorize the different types of media corruption, identify the different ways in which these are caused, and describe the contexts in which they manifest in current physical and virtual media environments and practices.
Part Three: Using the Virtual World to Create a Better Physical World encourages users to bridge their own thinking between the virtual and physical worlds of information and its communication. The previous chapters in the two previous sections focused primarily on identifying and analyzing current practices in digital communication and their ethical implications, and how to prevent or at least minimize unethical practices in digital journalism and digital media communication more broadly. By extension, the chapters in this final section, focus on ethical thinking and practices that not merely prevent unethical conduct, but proactively promote ethical thinking and practice that constitutes moreover, wise thinking and practice in digital media communication.
Chapter 10 investigates the differences between information, knowledge, and wisdom, with the aim examining the significance of those concepts and their relevance for digital media communication. The chapter begins with a short philosophy play (Spence 2008) that highlights dramatically those differences and their importance for the dissemination of media information that contributes to our well‐being, both as individuals and as a society. The chapter examines how the ethical dissemination of information by journalists and other communicators of digital information more generally, requires both knowledge and wisdom in the form of reflection, understanding, and judgment in knowing when and how to apply knowledge for both the professional and public good. Wisdom is essential because it provides practical guidance for how to act for the enhancement of both personal and social well‐being.
Chapter 11 shows how the digital world with its exponential increase in transparency and accountability allows for global understanding and justice to a far greater degree than when users were isolated geographically in the physical world.
Part IFrom Analog to Digital News
1A New Paradigm for News
You don’t need to understand the meaning of “paradigm shift” to know that that the last half of the twentieth century witnessed a world‐wide communication revolution. The change was so profound that it changed what it means for humans to communicate with one another, interpersonally as well as in mass communication.
This chapter describes the paradigm shift—the fundamental change in information production, delivery, and consumption—that occurred in the latter half of the twentieth century. This shift has been called the digital communication revolution, the third industrial revolution, the information age, and, as we will refer to it in this book, the digital era.
The focus of this book is how the creation and consumption of news have changed through this paradigm shift. Examining the changes reveals which practices are mere conventions of this moment in the history of news and which reflect essential values that endure through changes in technology and marketing. By the end of this chapter, users should be able to explain the major ways that the paradigm shift has affected contemporary digital journalism and be able to describe the journalistic values that have transcended paradigm shifts. Users should also understand that, throughout history, mass communication in general, and journalism in particular, has experienced a series of paradigm shifts as technology has created new platforms.
A paradigm shift, according to the scientist who coined that term, Thomas Kuhn, is “a change from one way of thinking to another. It’s a revolution, a transformation, a sort of metamorphosis. It does not just happen; rather it is driven by agents of change.” Kuhn argues that scientific advancement is not a slow, orderly evolution, but rather is a “series of peaceful interludes punctuated by intellectually violent revolutions,” and in those revolutions “one conceptual world view is replaced by another” (Thomas Kuhn, quoted in Take the Leap).
The communication paradigm shift at the end of the twentieth century was as challenging to the status quo as the transportation revolution that changed the world in the first half of that century. In industrialized nations, the first half of the twentieth century saw transition from the horse‐and‐buggy to trains to planes to at least one automobile in most households. Transportation technologies created a paradigm shift, a change so dramatic that how people behaved in all areas of their lives changed. A 500‐mile trip was no longer measured in weeks but in hours. A trip across an ocean could happen in less than a day rather than taking weeks. The new rapid ability to move people and goods expanded commerce, but with the creation of new opportunities, came new problems. For example, people could get fresh foods grown anywhere, rather than consume only those that could be grown seasonally and locally. This resulted in a wider variety of foods available but also created the need to sacrifice taste and ripeness of many fruits and vegetables in favor of their transportability and created a greater carbon footprint per food item. Friends and family no longer needed to live in the same small town to see one another on a regular basis. That expanded career opportunities but separated generations and grown siblings. That limited family members’ abilities to babysit children or care for elders.
Limited‐access roads, highways, and turnpikes, designed to get people from one point to another as efficiently as possible, were constructed, changing the experience of long‐distance ground travel. No longer did drivers need to think about camping on the side of the road or where to find the infrequent roadhouses along the route of travel. Now travelers could select from a multitude of fast foods and easy‐access exit‐located hotels. Isolated, efficient travel experience triumphed over that found in roadhouse boarding, with communal dining among strangers. Airline and train routes reinforced population and commercial centers, attracting more people and manufacturing by their presence, thus stimulating greater population migration and density. The transportation revolution built upon industry and reinforced the industry‐induced change from agrarian to urban lifestyles.
In the last half of the twentieth century, computer and satellite technology created a paradigm shift in communication equal in size and significance to that created by transportation technology. Interpersonal communication that was dependent on physically mailed letters and phone calls that happened to catch a person “in” were replaced with instant verbal and visual messaging, notifying the recipient immediately on a handheld or wearable two‐way communication device. News that had been delivered to mass audiences in episodic doses at prescribed times of day changed to immediate, user‐initiated access to real‐time targeted information. Delivery by a few corporate‐owned or government‐controlled news organizations that operated within geographical borders gave way to a global flood of information providers and direct interaction between news producers and consumers and a blending of those roles, with no gatekeeping required.
In the twentieth century, those who delivered messages via mass communication were generally professionals. The core group of those who laid claim to the label “journalist” were reporters and editors who worked in print media newsrooms.
Some who worked in the production of radio or television news, including some anchors who delivered the news on camera, field reporters, and producers, considered themselves journalists and worked to uphold professional values. Others who did the same tasks weren’t so sure that they were “real” journalists and didn’t think that the professionalism expectations of print journalists applied to them. Newspaper photographers and broadcast video and audio recorders were often considered tangential to news reports and were sometimes called “reporters with their brains knocked out” by text‐superior colleagues. Running a machine that captured images or sound was considered inferior to collecting and crafting words into news packages.
Radio shows were hosted by disc jockeys who played phonograph records and read advertising messages and “rip and read” news bulletins provided by wire services, with no thought of accountability for the truth or accuracy of the messages that they read.
The notion that stories were best told through a marriage of visuals, text, and sound was still in its infancy.
From the vantage point of today’s digital era, it is hard to believe that citizens or leaders in commerce, industry, or government could function without personal computers in hand to provide immediate access to others along with real‐time notification of time, weather, and news. In the twentieth century, everyone had a favorite news source. Whether it was the New York Times, La Monde, the BBC, or the Australian Broadcasting Corporation depended on location, as each source had limited geographic distribution.
Today, the question, “How do you get your news?” or “How do you know what is going on in the world?” is more likely to elicit the name of a social media app or a dismissive shrug than the name of a legacy news organization. It is disconcerting to anyone with Internet access to consider not being able to instantly know what is going on in the world through an infinite variety of sources.
Just as transportation fulfills the goal of physically moving people from one point to another, news production fulfills the goal of giving people information that they need so that they can make educated choices about what they believe, how they can govern themselves, and their role in creating a community that meets their needs and interests. For these goals to be met, essential journalistic values of balance, accuracy, relevance, and completeness must endure.
People seek news for many reasons, including entertainment and interpersonal connection in addition to learning about the world around them. Citizens need to be informed and educated about contemporary events to help them knowledgably participate in self‐governance. But no one wants to study the news all of the time. It is logical and ethically acceptable for individuals to sometimes choose not to be informed, just
