262,99 €
Emergency physicians assess and manage a wide variety of problems from patients presenting with a diversity of severities, ranging from mild to severe and life-threatening. They are expected to maintain their competency and expertise in areas where there is rapid knowledge change. Evidence-based Emergency Medicine is the first book of its kind in emergency medicine to tackle the problems practicing physicians encounter in the emergency setting using an evidence-based approach. It summarizes the published evidence available for the diagnosis and treatment of common emergency health care problems in adults. Each chapter contextualizes a topic area using a clinical vignette and generates a series of key clinically important diagnostic and treatment questions. By completing detailed reviews of diagnostic and treatment research, using evidence from systematic reviews, RCTs, and prospective observational studies, the authors provide conclusions and practical recommendations. Focusing primarily on diagnosis in areas where evidence for treatment is well accepted (e.g. DVTs), and treatment in other diseases where diagnosis is not complex (e.g. asthma), this text is written by leading emergency physicians at the forefront of evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based Emergency Medicine is ideal for emergency physicians and trainees, emergency department staff, and family physicians specialising in the acute care of medical and injured patients.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 2176
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2011
Contents
List of Contributors,
Foreword,
Acknowledgments,
List of Abbreviations,
Part 1 General Issues
1 Introduction
Brian H. Rowe & Peter C. Wyer
Case scenario
Introduction
Why EBEM?
Levels of evidence
Levels of evidence and systematic reviews
The Cochrane Collaboration
The Cochrane Library and emergency medicine
Question development
Locating the evidence: literature searching
Clinical epidemiology terminology
Collecting and interpreting the evidence for clinical practice
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
2 Knowledge Translation: A Primer for Emergency Physicians
Eddy S. Lang, Peter C. Wyer & Marc Afilalo
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
3 Critical Appraisal: General Issues in Emergency Medicine
Suneel Upadhye
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature:
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
4 Continuing Education
Joel Lexchin
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
5 Quality Improvement
Andrew Worster & Ann McKibbon
Clinical scenario
Background
General search strategy
Clinical questions
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
6 Medication Adherence
Ursula Whalen & Sunil Kripalani
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
7 Emergency Department Triage
Sandy L. Dong & Michael Bullard
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
8 Emergency Department Overcrowding
Michael Schull & Matthew Cooke
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
Part 2 Respiratory
9 Emergency Management of Asthma Exacerbations
Brian H. Rowe & Carlos A. Camargo, Jr.
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
10 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations
Brian H. Rowe & Rita K. Cydulka
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
11 Diagnosis and Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Sam G. Campbell & Tom Marrie
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
12 Deep Vein Thrombosis
Eddy S. Lang & Phil Wells
Case scenario
Background
General search strategy
Clinical questions
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
13 Pulmonary Embolism
Phil Wells & Michael Brown
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
14 Prevention and Treatment of Influenza
Stephen R. Pitts
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
15 Anaphylaxis
Theodore Gaeta
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
Part 3 Cardiology
16 Chest Pain
Alain Vadeboncoeur, Jerrald Dankoff & Eddy S. Lang
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical appraisal of the literature
Conclusions
References
17 Acute Coronary Syndromes,
Kirk Magee
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
18 Acute Myocardial Infarction
Bjug Borgundvaag
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical appraisal of the literature
Conclusions
References
19 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Brett Jones & Sean P. Collins
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
20 Atrial Fibrillation,
Barry Diner
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
21 Ventricular and Supraventricular Arrhythmias
Eddy S. Lang & Eli Segal
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
22 Cardiac Arrest
Riyad B. Abu-Laban & Michael Shuster
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Reference
Part 4 General Medical Conditions, 235
23 Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Peter W. Greenwald, Scott Weingart & H. Bryant Nguyen
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
24 Delirium
Denise Nassisi & Andy Jagoda
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
25 Caring for the Elderly
Christopher R. Carpenter, Michael Stern & Arthur B. Sanders
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical appraisal of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
26 Syncope
Richard Lappin & James Quinn
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
27 General Toxicology
Luke Yip, Nicole Bouchard & Marco L.A. Sivilotti
SCENARIO 1
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Conclusions
SCENARIO 2
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
SCENARIO 3
Clinical scenario
Background
General search strategy
Clinical question
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
28 Toxicology: Acetaminophen and Salicylate Poisoning
Mark Yarema & Richard Dart
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature: acetaminophen
Critical review of the literature: salicylate
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
Part 5 Injury,
29 Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Jeffrey J. Bazarian & Will Townend
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
30 Neck Injuries
Marcia L. Edmonds & Robert Brison
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
31 Ankle Injuries
Jerome Fan
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interests
References
32 Knee Injuries
Anita Pozgay & Elisabeth Hobden
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Conclusions
References
33 Wrist injuries
Sandy L. Dong & Brian H. Rowe
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
34 Shoulder Injuries
Jenn Carpenter, Marcel Emond & Robert Brison
Clinical scenarios
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical appraisal of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
35 Chest Trauma
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
36 Hemorrhagic Shock
Dennis Djogovic, Jonathan Davidow & Peter Brindley
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
Part 6 Genitourinary and Abdominal,
37 Acute Appendicitis
James A. Nelson & Stephen R. Hayden
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
38 Ectopic Pregnancy
Heather Murray & Elisha David Targonsky
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical appraisal of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgement
References
39 Acute Ureteric Colic
Andrew Worster
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
40 Urinary Tract Infection
Rawle A. Seupaul, Chris McDowell & Robert Bassett
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
41 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Linda Papa & Kurt Weber
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
42 Pregnancy
Ashley Shreves
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
43 Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Michael Bullard & Justin Cheung
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Clinical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
Part 7 Neurosciences
44 Transient Ischemic Attack
Ted Glynn
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
45 Stroke
William J. Meurer & Robert Silbergleit
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
46 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Jeffrey J. Perry
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
47 Bacterial Meningitis
Cheryl K. Chang & Peter C. Wyer
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical appraisal of the literature
Conclusions
References
48 Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders
Benjamin W. Friedman
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
49 Seizures
Elizabeth B. Jones
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
50 The Agitated Patient
Michael S. Radeos & Edwin D. Boudreaux
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
Part 8 ENT
51 Sore Throat
Benson Yeh & Barnet Eskin
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
52 Rhinosinusitis
Errol Stern
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
53 Conjunctivitis
Nicola E. Schiebel
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
Part 9 Minor Procedures
54 Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
David W. Messenger & Marco L. A. Sivilotti
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
55 Wound Repair
Helen Ouyang & James Quinn,
Case scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature:
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
56 Soft Tissue Abscess,
Heather Murray
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
57 Ultrasound Use: Three Select Applications
Srikar Adhikari & Michael Blaivas
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
References
Part 10 Public Health
58 Injury Prevention
Mary Patricia McKay & Liesl A. Curtis
Clinical scenarios
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
59 Intimate Partner Violence
Debra Houry
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
60 Smoking Cessation
Lisa Cabral & Steven L. Bernstein
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
61 Immunization
Jeremy Hess & Katherine L. Heilpern
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
62 Alcohol and Other Drugs
Barbara M. Kirrane, Linda C. Degutis & Gail D’Onofrio
SCENARIO 1
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
SCENARIO 2
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
63 Elder Abuse
Ralph J. Riviello
Clinical scenario
Background
Clinical questions
General search strategy
Critical review of the literature
Conclusions
Conflicts of interest
References
Index
This book is dedicated to:
Our patients, who have generated the clinical questions proposed in this book and who deserve our best efforts to identify, synthesize, update and disseminate evidence-based care;
The many practitioners from within and outside emergency medicine who have helped advance the field of evidence-based emergency medicine over the past two decades;
And finally to our families, especially our spouses/partners, for their support and encouragement throughout our careers and during the production of this book.
This edition first published 2009, ©2009 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
BMJ Books is an imprint of BMJ Publishing Group Limited, used under licence by Blackwell Publishing which was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing programme has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell.
Registered office: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting a specific method, diagnosis, or treatment by physicians for any particular patient. The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. Readers should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization or Website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or Website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet Websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. No warranty may be created or extended by any promotional statements for this work. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any damages arising here from.
Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
Evidence-based emergency medicine / edited by Brian H. Rowe.
p.; cm.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 978-1-4051-6143-5
1. Emergency medicine. 2. Evidence-based medicine. I. Rowe, Brian H.
[DNLM: 1. Emergency Medicine-methods. 2. Evidence-Based Medicine-methods. WB 105 E935 2008]
RC86.7.E95 2008
616.02'5-dc22 2008010823
ISBN: 9781405161435
List of contributors
Riyad B. Abu-Laban MD, MHSc, FRCPCAssistant Professor Division of Emergency MedicineUniversity of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada andAttending Physician and Research Director Department of Emergency MedicineVancouver General Hospital Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Srikar Adhikari MD, RDMSAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineUniversity of NebraskaOmaha, Nebraska, USA
Marc AfilaloAssociate ProfessorDepartment of Family Medicine McGill University Montreal, Quebec and Chief of Emergency Medicine Department of Emergency MedicineSMBD Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Robert Bassett DODepartment of Emergency MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, Indiana, USA
Jeffrey J. Bazarian MD, MPHAssociate ProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicineand NeurologyUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine andDentistryRochester, New York, USA
Steven L. Bernstein MDVice Chair for ResearchAssociate Professor of Clinical EmergencyMedicineFamily/Social Medicine, Epidemiology/ Population Health Albert Einstein College of MedicineMontefiore Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Bronx, New York, USA
Michael Blaivas MD, RDMSAssistant Professor of Internal Medicine Department of Internal Medicine Northside Hospital Forsyth Cumming, Georgia, USA
Bjug Borgundvaag MD, PhDAssistant Professor Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Centre Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nicole Bouchard MDAssistant Clinical Professor Emergency Medicine Department New York–Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Medical Center New Yorkand Director of Medical Toxicology New York City Poison Control Center New York, USA
Edwin D. Boudreaux PhDResearch DirectorDepartment of Emergency Medicine Cooper University Hospital Camden, New Jersey, USA
Peter Brindley MDStaff PhysicianDivision of Critical Care Medicine University of Alberta Hospital Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Robert Brison, MD, MPH, MSc, FRCPCProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicineand Community Health and EpidemiologyQueen’s UniversityKingston, Ontario, Canada
Michael Brown MD, MScProfessor of Epidemiology and EmergencyMedicineCollege of Human MedicineMichigan State UniversitySpectrum Health-Butterworth HospitalsGrand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Michael Bullard MD, CCFP(EM), ABEM,FRCPCProfessorDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Lisa Cabral MDAssistant Professor of Clinical EmergencyMedicineAlbert Einstein College of MedicineMontefiore Medical CenterDepartment of Emergency MedicineBronx, New York, USA
Carlos A. Camargo, Jr., MD, DrPHDirector, EMNet Coordinating Center Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Sam G. Campbell MB BCh, CCFP(EM),CHE, Dip PEC(SA)Associate ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Christopher R. Carpenter MD, MScAssistant ProfessorDivision of Emergency MedicineSt. Louis School of MedicineWashington UniversitySt. Louis, Missouri, USA
Jenn Carpenter MD, FRCPCAssistant ProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicineand Community Health and EpidemiologyQueen’s UniversityKingston, Ontario, Canada
Cheryl K. Chang MD, MPHAssistant Clinical ProfessorDepartment of MedicineColumbia University College of Physicians andSurgeonsNew York, USA
Justin Cheung MD, FRCPStaff Physician Division of Gastroenterology Department of Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Sean P. Collins MD, MScAssistant Professor Department of Emergency Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Matthew Cooke PhD, FCEM, FRCS(Ed)Professor of Emergency MedicineWarwick Medical SchoolUniversity of Warwick, Coventryand Heart of England NHS Foundation TrustBirmingham, UK
Liesl A. Curtis MDEmergency Medicine Physician Department of Emergency Medicine Georgetown University Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Rita K. Cydulka MD, MSAssociate Professor and Vice ChairDepartment of Emergency MedicineMetroHealth Medical CenterCase Western Reserve University School ofMedicineCleveland, Ohio, USA
Jerrald DankoffAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineMcGill UniversityMontreal, Quebecand Attending StaffDepartment of Emergency Medicine SMBD Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Richard Dart MD, PhDDirectorRocky Mountain Poison and Drug CenterDenver, Colorado, USA
Jonathan Davidow MDStaff PhysicianDepartment of Emergency MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, Albertaand Division of Critical Care MedicineUniversity of Alberta HospitalEdmonton, Alberta, Canada
Linda C. Degutis, DrPHAssociate ProfessorSection of Emergency MedicineYale UniversityNew Haven, Connecticut, USA
Barry Diner MD, MPH, FACEPAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineEmory University School of MedicineEmory UniversityAtlanta, Georgia, USA
Dennis Djogovic MD, FRCPCAssistant Clinical ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, Albertaand Division of Critical Care MedicineUniversity of Alberta HospitalEdmonton, Alberta, Canada
Sandy L. Dong MD, MSc, FRCPC, DABEMAssistant Clinical Professor and RCPS AssistantProgram DirectorDepartment of Emergency MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, Alberta, Canada
Gail D’Onofrio MD, MSProfessor and ChairSection of Emergency MedicineYale UniversityNew Haven, Connecticut, USA
Marcia L. Edmonds MD, MScStaff PhysicianDivision of Emergency Medicine University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada
Marcel Emond MD, MSc, FRCPCProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicineand Family MedicineLaval UniversityQuebec, Canada
Barnet Eskin MD PhDAssistant Research Director Department of Emergency Medicine Morristown Memorial Hospital Morristown, New Jersey, USA
Jerome Fan MD, FRCPStaff PhysicianDepartment of Emergency MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamilton, Ontario, Canada
Benjamin W. Friedman MD, MSAssistant Professor Department of Emergency Medicine Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore Medical Center Bronx, New York, USA
Theodore Gaeta DO, MPHVice-Chairman & Residency DirectorDepartment of Emergency MedicinebrNew York Methodist HospitalBrooklyn, New York, USA andAssociate Professor of Emergency in ClinicalMedicineWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York, USA
Ted Glynn MD, FACEPProgram DirectorMichigan State University, Emergency MedicineResidency, LansingandAssistant Clinical Professor of EmergencyMedicineColleges of Human and Osteopathic MedicineMichigan State UniversityEast LansingandAttending PhysicianIngham Regional Medical CenterLansing, Michigan, USA
Peter W. Greenwald MDVisiting Assistant Professor of MedicineDivision of Emergency MedicineNew York–Presbyterian HospitalWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York, USA
Stephen R. Hayden MDResidency Director Department of Emergency Medicine University of California at San Diego San Diego, California, USA
Katherine L. Heilpern MDResidency DirectorAda Lee and Pete Correll Professor and ChairDepartment of Emergency MedicineEmory University School of MedicineEmory UniversityAtlanta, Georgia, USA
Jeremy Hess MD, MPHAssistant ProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicineand Environmental and Occupational HealthEmory University Schools of Medicine and PublicHealthEmory UniversityAtlanta, Georgia, USA
Elisabeth Hobden MD, FRCPC, DipSport MedDepartment of Emergency Medicine The Ottawa Hospital Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Debra Houry MD, MPHDirector, Center for Injury Control Vice Chair for Research Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Andy Jagoda MDProfessorDepartment of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, USA
Brett Jones MD, PhDStaff PhysicianYa vapai Medical CenterPrescott, AZ, USA
Elizabeth B. Jones MD, FACEPAssistant Professor Department of Emergency Medicine University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Texas, USA
Barbara M. Kirrane MDAssistant ProfessorSection of Emergency MedicineYale UniversityNew Haven, Connecticut, USA
Sunil Kripalani MD, MScAssistant ProfessorDivision of General Internal Medicine and PublicHealthVanderbilt UniversityNashville, Tennessee, USA
Eddy S. Lang MDCM, CCFP(EM), CSPQAssistant Professor of Emergency Medicine Department of Family Medicine McGill University Montreal, Quebecand Attending Physician Department of Emergency Medicine SMBD Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Richard Lappin MD, PhDAssistant Professor of Clinical Medicineand Assistant Attending Physician Department of Emergency Medicine New York–Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center New York, USA
Joel Lexchin MDProfessor, School of Health Policy andManagementYork UniversityToronto, Ontarioand Associate ProfessorDepartment of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of Toronto, Torontoand Attending StaffEmergency DepartmentUniversity Health NetworkToronto, Canada
Kirk Magee MD, MSc, FRCP(C)Associate Professor and RCPS Program DirectorDepartment of Emergency MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifax, Nova Scotiaand QEII Health Sciences CentreHalifax InfirmaryHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Tom Marrie MD, FRCPCProfessor and Dean Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Chris McDowell MDDepartment of Emergency Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Mary Patricia McKay, MD, MPHAssociate Professor Department of Emergency Medicine George Washington University Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Ann McKibbon PhDAssociate ProfessorDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology andBiostatisticsMcMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
David W. Messenger MDAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineQueen’s UniversityKingston, Ontario, Canada
William J. Meurer MDLecturer in Emergency Medicine and Neurology Department of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Heather Murray MD, MSc, FRCP(C)Assistant ProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicineand Community Health and EpidemiologyQueen’s UniversityKingston, Ontario, Canada
Denise Nassisi MDAssistant Professor Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, USA
James A. Nelson MDAssistant Clinical Professor Department of Emergency Medicine University of California at San Diego San Diego, California, USA
David H. Newman, MDAssistant ProfessorDepartment of MedicineColumbia University College of Physiciansand Surgeons, New YorkandDirector of Clinical ResearchDepartment of Emergency MedicineSt. Luke’s/Roosevelt Hospital CenterNew York, USAAssociate ProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicine andMedicineDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineLoma Linda UniversityLoma Linda, California, USA
Helen Ouyang MD, MPHResident Physician in Emergency Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital andMassachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Linda Papa MD, MSc, CCFP, FRCP(C), FACEPDirector of Academic Clinical ResearchDepartment of Emergency MedicineOrlando Regional Medical CenterOrlando, Floridaand Adjunct ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineCollege of Medicine, University of FloridaGainsville, Floridaand Clinical Associate ProfessorFlorida State University College of MedicineTallahassee, Florida, USA
Jeffrey J. Perry MD, MSc, CCFP-EMAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawa, Ontario, Canada
Stephen R. PittsAssociate Professor Department of Emergency Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Emory Crawford Long Hospital Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Anita Pozgay MD, FRCPC, Dip Sports
MedAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineThe Ottawa HospitalOttawa, Ontario, Canada
James Quinn MD, MSAssociate Professor of Surgery/EmergencyMedicineDivision of Emergency MedicineStanford UniversityStanford, California, USA
Michael S. Radeos MDResearch DirectorDepartment of Emergency Medicine New York Hospital Queens Flushing, New York, USA
Ralph J. Riviello MD, MS, FACEP,FAAEMAssociate Professor Director of Clinical Researchand Associate Program Director Department of Emergency Medicine Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Brian H. Rowe MD, MSc, CCFP(EM), FCCPProfessor and Research Director Department of Emergency Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Arthur B. Sanders MDProfessorDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Arizona, USA
Nicola E. Schiebel MD, FRCPCAssistant ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota, USA
Michael Schull MD, MSc, FRCPCSenior ScientistInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesTorontoand DirectorDivision of Emergency MedicineDepartment of MedicineUniversity of TorontoToronto, Canada
Eli SegalStaff PhysicianDepartment of Family MedicineMcGill UniversityMontreal, Quebecand Department of Emergency MedicineSMBD Jewish General HospitalMontreal, Quebec, Canada
Rawle A. Seupaul MDAssociate Professor of Clinical EmergencyMedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, Indiana, USA
Ashley Shreves MDAttending Physician Department of Emergency Medicine St. Luke’s–Roosevelt Hospital New York, USA
Michael Shuster MD, FRCPCStaff PhysicianDepartment of Emergency MedicineMineral Springs HospitalBanff, Alberta, Canada
Robert Silbergleit MDAssociate ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor, Michigan, USA
Richard Sinert DOAssociate Professor and Research Director Department of Emergency Medicine Downstate Medical Center State University of New YorkBrooklyn, New York, USA
Marco L. A. Sivilotti MD, MSc, FRCPC,
FACEP, FACMTAssociate ProfessorDepartments of Emergency Medicineand Pharmacology and ToxicologyQueen’s UniversityKingston, Ontario andConsultantOntario Poison CentreToronto, Ontario, Canada
Errol Stern MDCM, FRCPC, FACEP, CSPQAssistant Professor Department of Family Medicine McGill University Montreal, Quebec andAttending Staff Emergency Medicine SMBD Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Michael Stern MDAssistant Professor of Medicine Department of Medicine Division of Emergency Medicine Weill Cornell Medical Center New York, USA
Elisha David Targonsky BSc, MScDepartmental AssistantDepartment of Emergency Medicine andCommunity Health and EpidemiologyQueen’s UniversityKingston, Ontario, Canada
Will Townend MD, FCEMDepartment of Emergency MedicineHull Royal Infirmary Hull, UK
Suneel Upadhye MD, MSc, FRCPC, ABEMAssistant Clinical Professor Division of Emergency Medicine McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Alain Vadeboncoeur MD, CCFP, CSPQ(EM)Assistant Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Montreal Montreal, Quebecand Chief of Emergency Medicine Montreal Heart Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Kurt Weber MDAttending PhysicianDepartment of Emergency MedicineOrlando Regional Medical CenterOrlando, Floridaand Clinical Assistant ProfessorFlorida State University College of MedicineTallahassee, Florida, USA
Scott Weingart MDDirectorDivision of Emergency Critical Care Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, USA
Phil Wells MD, MSc, FRCPCProfessor and Chief Division of Hematology Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontarioand Director of Clinical Research The Ottawa Hospital Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Ursula Whalen MDDivision of General Internal Medicine and Public HealthVanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Andrew Worster MD, CCPF (EM), MSc,FCFPAssociate ProfessorEmergency MedicineClinical Epidemiology & BiostatisticsMcMaster UniversityHamilton, Ontario, Canada
Peter C. Wyer MDAssociate Clinical ProfessorDepartment of MedicineColumbia University College of Physicians andSurgeonsNew York, USA
Mark Yarema MD, FRCPCDivision Chief, Research Department of Emergency Medicine Calgary Health Region Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Benson Yeh MDResidency Director Department of Emergency Medicine Brooklyn Hospital Center Brooklyn, New York, USA
Luke Yip MD, FACMT, FACEM, FACEPConsultantDepartment of EmergencyThe Prince Charles HospitalChermside, Queensland, Australiaand Attending FacultyRocky Mountain Poison and Drug CenterDenver, Coloradoand Attending Staff PhysicianDepartment of MedicineDivision of Medical ToxicologyDenver Health Medical CenterDenver, Coloradoand Clinical Assistant ProfessorSchool of PharmacyUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences CenterDenver, Colorado, USA
Shahriar Zehtabchi MDAssociate ProfessorDepartment of Emergency MedicineDownstate Medical CenterState University of New YorkBrooklyn, New York, USA
Acknowledgments
The editors would like to acknowledge the publishers Wiley-Blackwell, and especially Ms. Mary Banks, for assisting in the early development of the Evidence-based Emergency Medicine idea. We would also like to express our sincerest appreciation to our development editor at Wiley-Blackwell, Ms. Laura Beaumont, for her guidance, patience and friendship during the production of this book. We wish her continued success in her future work. We would also like to thank the Evidence-based Emergency Medicine authors for their often Herculean efforts to produce the chapters that have contributed to the success of this book. We are indebted to Mirjana Misina for her careful guidance through production editing. Finally, as the editor, I would like to personally thank the section editors for their time, interest and dedication to the completion of this book.
Brian H. Rowe
List of Abbreviations
ABCairway, breathing and circulationACEangiotension-converting enzymeACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansAHRQAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityAPanteroposteriorARRabsolute risk reductionASAacetyl-salicylic acidBETbest evidence topic β2-agonistsbeta-2-receptor agonist agentsBMJBritish Medical JournalCADTHCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCATScritically appraised topicsCDCCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCDSRCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsCENTRALCochrane Central Register of Controlled TrialsCIconfidence intervalCINAHLCompedium of International Nursing and Allied Health LiteratureCMEcontinuing medical educationCOPDchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCPDcontinuing professional developmentCPGclinical practice guidelinesCPRclinical prediction ruleCTcomputerized tomographyCXRchest X-rayDAREDatabase of Abstracts of Reviews of EffectsDSMDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of MentalDisorders, 4th ednDVTdeep vein thrombosisEBEMevidence-based emergency medicineEBMevidence-based medicineECGelectrocardiogramEDemergency departmentELISAenzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assayEMBASEEuropean-based electronic database maintained by ElsevierEMSemergency medical servicesESeffect sizeFASTfocused assessment with sonography for traumaFDAUS Food and Drug AdministrationFEV1forced expiratory volume in one secondGCSGlasgow Coma ScoreHAHeadacheHIVhuman immunodeficiency virusHRhazard ratioICCintraclass correlation coefficientICDInternational Classification of DiseaseICUintensive care unitIMintramuscularINRinternational normalized ratioIQRinter-quartile rangeIVintravenousJAMAJournal of the American Medical AssociationKTknowledge translationLLMWlow molecular weightLOSlength of stayLRlikelihood ratioLWBSleft without being seenMDImetered dose inhalerMEDLINENational Library of Medicine electronic databaseMeSHmedical subject headingmgmilligramMgSO4magnesium sulfateMImyocardial infarctionmlmillilitersMMSEMini Mental Status ExaminationMRImagnetic resonance imagingMRSAmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusNHSUK National Health ServiceNICENational Institute for Health and ClinicalExcellenceNNHnumber needed to harmNNTnumber needed to treatNSAIDnon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugO2oxygenORodds ratio/sPBLproblem-based learningPDSAplan, do, study and actPEpulmonary embolismPEFpeak expiratory flowPICOpopulation, intervention, control and outcomePICO-Dpopulation, intervention, control, outcome and designPOper oralQIquality improvementRCAroot cause analysisRCERational Clinical Examination Series of JAMARCTrandomized controlled trialROCreceiver operating curveRRrelative risk/sRRRrelative risk reductionSaO2oxygen saturationSARSsevere acute respiratory syndromeSCsubcutaneousSDstandard deviationSMDstandardized mean differenceSRsystematic reviewSTEMIST segment elevation myocardial infarctionSVCsuperior vena cavaTBITraumatic brain inTIAtransient ischemic attackt-PAtissue plasminogen activatorVTEvenous thromboembolismWBCwhite blood cellWHOWorld Health OrganizationWMDweighted mean difference1 General Issues
1 Introduction
Brian H. Rowe1 & Peter C. Wyer2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton,Canada
2Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA
Case scenario
A 25-year-old woman presented to an emergency department(ED) with an exacerbation of her migraine headaches. Her migraine headaches had previously been well controlled; however, stressful conflicts had recently occurred at work, she had not been able to sleep properly for two nights and she admitted unusually low fluid intake for the previous 2 days. She reported that her headache developed gradually, was associated with nausea and vomiting, and she rated the headache as 9 on a 10-point headache pain scale. She denied fever, syncope or other signs of pathological headaches, and assessed the episode as being “similar to my last migraine headache that brought me to the emergency department 2 years ago”.
She improved quickly with intravenous saline and metoclopramide and was ready for discharge home after 90 minutes. Her headache at reassessment was 1 out of 10 and her nausea had resolved. The patient informed you that she was late for an important work meeting that would consume her time for the next 2 days and wondered what she could do to minimize the risk of suffering a recurrence.
Introduction
What is evidence-based emergency medicine (EBEM) and why is there such a controversy over the concept and contempt for the phrase? The term evidence-based medicine (EBM) was first coined in the early 1990s by Gordon Guyatt [1] and has now become a stable in the medical lexicon. In addition to EBM’s long history, controversy exists regarding its components and value in decision making [2,3]. In most cases, however, it can be described as the combined use of experience, best evidence and patient’s preference and values to develop an approach to a clinical problem, often referred to as evidence-based medical care.
The migraine headache example may help readers better understand the concept. The patient’s question related to prevention of headache and this topic is well covered in the chapter on migraine headaches in this book (See chapter 48). From an evidence perspective, the well-informed clinician knows that there is evidence that a dose of dexamethasone in the emergency department (ED) (best evidence based on a systematic review (SR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) is helpful [4]. Moreover, experience reminds the clinician that patients with moderate to severe migraine headaches also can deteriorate, re-present to the ED, and/or lose valuable time from work and other activities (clinical experience). The clinician is concerned and wishes to protect the patient from any and all of these events (and so does her employer). Unfortunately, the patient protests this decision because corticos-teroids cause her to develop acne, retain water and have insomnia. She also has a major weekend function and feels these medications may create havoc with her social life. Despite the clinician’s reassurances, she refuses the intravenous corticosteroid treatment (patient preference and values). Readers in clinical practice will be very familiar with this type of scenario.
What is the evidence-based decision in this case? Some traditionalists may suggest that their decision is final and the patient should accept the corticosteroid treatment. The EBM clinician might further use the available evidence to explain the benefits and risks of treatment options, in conjunction with the patient’s preference and his/her experience. In the event that agreement cannot be reached between the clinician and the patient, the EBEM approach would propose an alternative “next-best evidence” and similarly reasonable approach. For example, the clinician may recognize that reduction of pain to less than two out of ten reduces headache relapse [5]. Moreover, the addition of education about triggers and very close follow-up may improve outcomes in such patients. It is this combination of evidence, patient preference and clinical experience that coalesces to form the EBEM decision.
Why EBEM?
The EBM approach may seem intuitive to many emergency practitioners. However, when originally proposed, debate ensued, and in some cases continues [6,7]. This forces the question: why is this being proposed in emergency medicine? In a therapy issue, clinicians must ultimately decide whether the benefits of treatment are worth the costs, inconvenience, and harms associated with the care. This is often a difficult task; however, it is made more difficult by the exponentially increasing volume of literature and the lack of time to search and distill this evidence [8]. Although clinicians of the early 21st century have an urgent need for just-in-time, on-demand clinical information, their time to access such information has likely never been as compressed. Increases in patient volume and complexity, patient care demands, and the lack of access to resources have exacerbated the work frustrations for many clinicians. These concerns often take precedence over seeking the most relevant, up-to-date and comprehensive evidence for patient problems.
Despite the fact that the most common problems posed by patients presenting to emergency rooms are encountered daily around the world, appropriate treatment approaches are often not fully employed and practice variation is impressive. For a variety of reasons, the results from high level evidence such as RCTs are not readily available to busy clinicians and keeping up to date is becoming increasingly difficult. Moreover, a valid, reliable and up-to-date clinical bottom line to guide treatment decisions has been elusive [8].
However, availability ofhigh quality published trialsand systematic reviews relevant to an area of practice are not the only components necessary to practicing “best evidence medicine”. Clinicians also need rigorously produced, synthesized best evidence information to assist them at the point of care. In emergency care, time is increasingly more precious and the need for this digestible information has never been greater.
Levels of evidence
A wide variety of tools to describe levels of evidence have been developed and employed in clinical medicine to reflect the degree of confidence to which results from research may be accepted as valid. From levels of evidence, strengths of recommendations are generated which are graded according to the strength of the scientific evidence supporting them. These levels of evidence can be criticized forbeingdifferent with eachsetofguidelines or report, being overly complex, and being almost universally focused on therapeutic interventions.
Recently, a group of experts in the field of guidelines introduced a grading system as part of an effort to develop a single approach supported by international consensus. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group have published their recommendations, which have been adopted by increasing numbers of specialty and health policy organizations [9]. The GRADE system classifies quality of evidence into one of four levels (high, moderate, low and very low) and quality of recommendations in one of two levels (strong and weak).
Once again, an example may be illustrative. In the case scenario described above dealing with therapy, the highest level of evidence (HIGH) is based on RCTs. A single RCT can retain HIGH grading if there are no study limitations, the threats to validity are low, the association is strong and adjustments for all potential confounders have been performed. Although HIGH status is awarded to RCTs, many trials in emergency medicine are not large enough to maintain this evidence status. The evidence would similarly retain its HIGH ranking if meta-analysis of two or more similar trials show consistency of effect and statistically significant relative risk (RR) results (> 2.0 or < 0.5 for reduction) [10]. Fortunately, in this case, the systematic review does support the single clinical trial identified (see Chapter 48).
While considerable debate exists regarding the relative merits of evidence derived from large individual trials versus systematic reviews [11], due to the costs associated with large, multi-centered trials, they remain uncommon across emergency medicine and remain restricted to certain topic areas (e.g., cardiology, rheumatology, stroke, and so forth). While examples of large databases and observational studies do exist in emergency medicine [12], smaller studies are much more common. Consequently, it is likely that systematic reviews will play an increasingly important role in the future decisions made by patients, clinicians, administrators and society in all areas of health care.
MODERATE evidence is based on RCTs that contain flaws that preclude a HIGH evidence rating or observational studies. The RCTs may show either positive trends that are not statistically significant or no trends and are associated with a high risk of false-negative results. The observational studies may be elevated to HIGH evidence (from LOW) in certain cases, such as when a statistically significant relative risk of > 5 (< 0.2) is identified based on direct evidence with no major threats to validity.
Finally, a LOW level of evidence is based on observational studies of any kind (e.g., cohorts, case series, case–control studies or cross-sectional studies). VERY LOW grading can be achieved when evidence is based on observational studies of low quality or the opinion of respected authorities or expert committees as indicated in published consensus conferences or guidelines.
In diagnostic studies, the same rules apply; however, most of the studies in this setting are not RCTs. Given the relatively recent development of the GRADE system, the editors of this text have not required authors to apply this in each chapter; although, given the summary of evidence provided in each chapter, readers should be able to rate the evidence presented using the general guide. Moreover, future editions of the book will focus on GRADE or similar systems of evidence assessment.
Levels of evidence and systematic reviews
As discussed above, one possible solution to the information dilemma for clinicians is to focus on evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) [13]. SRs address a focused clinical question, utilize comprehensive search strategies to avoid publication and selection biases, assess the quality of the evidence and, if appropriate, employ meta-analytic summary statistics to synthesize the results from research on a particular topic with a defined protocol. They represent an important and rapidly expanding body of literature for the clinician dealing with patients presenting to the emergency setting and they are an integral component of EBM.
Although there has been a recent increase in the production of diagnostic testing SRs, the most common application of SRs is in therapeutic interventions in clinical practice. One important exception is the Rational Clinical Examination (RCE) series published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). This series presents SRs in the field of diagnostic testing (especially clinical examination and laboratory/imaging testing). Finally, the Cochrane Collaboration has developed a Diagnostic Methods Working Group and is planning to introduce diagnostic test systematic reviews to their collection of products in the near future. Unfortunately, the methodology of diagnostic SRs lags behind that of the therapeutic SRs; however, there are strong indications that this is changing.
Despite publications illustrating the importance of methodological quality in conducting and reporting both RCTs [14] and SRs [15], not all SRs are created using the same rigorous methods described above. Like most other research, variable methodological quality has been identified in systematic reviews. High-quality SRs of therapies attempt to identify the literature on a specific therapeutic intervention using a structured, a priori and welldefined methodology contained in a protocol. Rigorously conducted SRs are recognizable by their avoidance of publication and selection bias. For example, they include foreign language, both published and unpublished literature, and employ well-described comprehensive search strategies to avoid publication bias. Their trial selection includes studies with similar populations, interventions/controls, outcomes and methodologies and use of more than one “reviewer” to select included studies.
Systematic reviews regarding therapy would most commonly combine evidence from RCTs. In the event that statistical pooling is possible and clinically appropriate, the resultant pooled estimate represents the best “summary estimate” of the treatment effect. A systematic review with summary pooled statistics is referred to as a meta-analysis, while one is without summary data is referred to as a qualitative systematic review. Both of these options represent valid approaches to reporting SRs and both are now increasingly commonly published in the medical literature.
In the field of emergency medicine, SRs have been evaluated and found to contain serious flaws that potentially introduce bias into their conclusions [16]. This is an alarming picture for the profession, and one that needs to be addressed by members as well as authors and journal editors. Most of this research was completed prior to the establishment of the QUOROM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses) statement; however, recent evidence suggests that this situation has not resulted in dramatic improvements in the quality of published SRs [17]. Consequently, ED physicians must be vigilant in their search for and evaluation of SRs as they pertain to this field.
The Cochrane Collaboration
The Cochrane Collaboration, a multinational, volunteer, collaborative effort on the part of researchers, clinicians from all medical disciplines, and consumers, represents one source of high-quality systematic review information available to most clinicians with very little effort [18]. The Cochrane Library is a compendium of databases and related instructional tools. Assuch, itis the principal product of the large international volunteer effort in the Cochrane Collaboration.
Within the Collaboration, specific review groups are responsible for developing, completing and updating SRs in specific topic areas. For example, the Cochrane Airway Group (CAG: www.cochrane-airways.ac.uk) is responsible for “airway” topics (e.g., asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary embolism). Reviewers within the Cochrane review groups represent consumers, researchers, physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, educators and others interested in the topic areas. Not all review groups have produced acute care reviews; however, ED topics are particularly well covered by some (e.g., CAG) [19]. Recently the relevance of the Cochrane Collaboration effort to emergency medicine has been enhanced through the advent of the Cochrane Prehospital and Emergency Health Field (CPEHF: www.cochranepehf.org), which is expected to substantially increase the number of reviews with direct relevance to this specialty [20].
Systematic reviews produced by members of the Cochrane Collaboration are the products of a priori research protocols, meet rigorous methodological standards, and are peer reviewed for content and methods prior to dissemination. Specifically, this process of review production is designed to reduce bias and ensure validity, using criteria discussed in the JAMA User’s Guide series [21]. As much as possible, this text book will focus on evidence derived from SRs, and as often as possible, those contained within the Cochrane Library.
The Cochrane Library and emergency medicine
The Cochrane Library is comprised of several databases, three of which deserve some description and discussion here as they relate to this EBEM textbook. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) is an extensive bibliographic database of controlled trials that has been identified through structured searches of electronic databases, and hand-searching by Cochrane review groups. Currently, it contains over 300,000 references (Cochrane Library, 2007, Issue 4) and can function as a primary literature searching approach with therapeutic topics. The Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) consists of critically appraised structured abstracts of non-Cochrane published reviews that meet standards set by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination at the University of York, England. Currently, DARE contains over 3500 reviews (Cochrane Library, 2007, Issue 4). The last, and possibly most important, resource is the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), a compilation of regularly updated SRs with meta-analytic summary statistics. Currently, the CDSR contains over 1200 protocols and 3500 completed reviews (Cochrane Library, 2007, Issue 4). Contents of the CDSR are contributed by Cochrane review groups, representing various medical topic areas (e.g., airways, stroke, heart, epilepsy, etc.). Within the CDSR, “protocols” describe the objectives of SRs that are in the process of being completed; “completed reviews” include the full text, and usually present summary statistics. Both protocols and reviews are produced using a priori criteria, adhere to rigorous methodological standards and undergo peer review prior to publication. Regular “updates” are required to capture new evidence and address criticisms and/or identified errors.
The quality of systematic reviews contained with in the Cochrane Library has been shown to be consistently high for individual topic areas as well as throughout the Cochrane Collaboration [22,23]. Recent evidence evaluated the quality of a random selection of SRs published in 2004 and, long after the production of the QUOROM guidelines, found some intriguing results [24]. First and foremost, the volume of SRs identified suggested a rapid proliferation of SRs in health care. Second, 71% of the reviews involved a therapeutic area, recapitulating our previous comment about SRs being less common in diagnostic areas. Finally, there were large differences identified between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews in the quality of reporting several important characteristics; Cochrane reviews were rated as higher quality. Overall, the reviewers reiterated the variable quality of some reviews in the literature and the need to be cautious when using these reviews in health care decisions.
Prehospital and emergency medicine involvement has been limited across the Cochrane Collaboration and in many review groups, consequently topics of interest to emergency physicians have perhaps not been a priority. The development of the CPEHF in 2004 was an important milestone for evidence-based prehospital and emergency medicine [25]. CPHEF was registered as an official entity of the Cochrane Collaboration and now has more than 3000 registered members (F. Archer, personal communication). The focus of CPEHF is prehospital (management up to the delivery in the emergency department), emergency (up to hospitalization) and disaster medicine. One of the functions of the field is to develop and maintain a register of studies relevant to the areas of prehospital and emergency health care. CPEHF has developed a validated search strategy to identify SRs and reports of trials in the Cochrane Library that are based on research that was conducted in the prehospital environment [26].
Evidence-based Emergency Medicine format
We are excited about highlighting the approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of common emergency conditions that will be detailed in this book. The editors of Evidence-based Emergency Medicine have attempted to select experts in both emergency medicine (content) as well as evidence-based medicine (methodology) to author thistext. Followingthisintroductory section, the remainder of the chapters will focus on individual topic areas.
The chapters in this book have all been organized in a similar fashion using the following format:
1 Case scenario/vignette
