14,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Fachliteratur
- Sprache: Englisch
Boost wellbeing and build a robust, productive culture in your workplace Your workplace's most powerful resource is its people. That's why it's critical to balance the needs of your business with the needs of the employees who make that business happen every day. At the heart of the matter is your workplace culture: the environments and relationships that shape your business, whether physical or virtual. How to Heal a Workplace shares the insights and hands-on advice that you need to better understand how your culture impacts your team. You'll learn how to manage interpersonal challenges--and anticipate the impact of policies and procedures--to create a healthier, happier and more productive environment. Drawing on real-world stories from diverse industries, in-demand workplace mental health consultant Kerry Howard shares strategies that will help you: * Boost employee wellbeing, and attract and retain staff by supporting their mental health * Understand how trauma is caused by everyday events and how this impacts the workplace * Combat bullying and harassment and prevent workplace injuries * Foster psychological safety, improve communication, and build better relationships between colleagues In How to Heal a Workplace, you'll find the practical advice you need to create a better culture, improve productivity and increase satisfaction across every area of your business.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 344
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Ähnliche
Table of Contents
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Introduction
Part I: Workplace Culture
CHAPTER 1: What is workplace culture?
What is workplace culture?
What the data is telling us and how it affects your business
What does our generation have to do with our work ethic?
Where to from here?
The challenge of building focus and resilience
Adapting for a new generation: Why it is essential for growth
Recruitment specialist spells out the future for business
How do we fix it?
CHAPTER 2: Why it's really about collective mental health
Toxicity in the workplace
How we interact with children shapes their sense of self
Our work and our self-worth
How technology is shaping us
Our early experiences shape our future mental health
Case study: Jenny
Trauma: What is it?
How trauma results in mental health problems
Children express their needs from an early age
The impact of trauma
Trauma in the workplace
Why tackle trauma in the workplace?
Employee assistance programs
Part II: The Role of Leadership
CHAPTER 3: Compassionate Leadership
Get to know your people
Dealing with confidentiality: how much should you tell them?
Inclusive leadership
Eliminating silos with transparency
Understanding the culture
The leadership lottery
We need checks and balances
What makes our people happy?
Categorising our attributes
Working with different personality types
How do supervisors cause psychosocial injuries?
Annette’s story
Change management is more than just process
Why senior leaders need to regularly review their HR data
Communication needs to be a habit
The benefit of an independent review
Spotting early signs of a negative change in culture
CHAPTER 4: Conscientious Leadership
The changing world of work
Consciously leading
The self-management system
Part III: Risk and Psychological Safety
CHAPTER 5: Validation
How our brains process trauma
What happens when we're not validated?
Why we need to validate
Validation facilitates recovery
Mediation facilitates being heard
Case study: Monica
Leadership stress
Provide recognition validation without action validation
CHAPTER 6: Mitigating Risk in Psychological Safety
Onboarding
New leadership
Great leaders empower solutions
It's not enough to simply listen to your people
Case study: Karen
The benefit of the doubt
Why great workers aren't always great leaders
Part IV: Prevention and Recovery
CHAPTER 7: Industry Challenges
Responsibility
First responders
Georgeina Whelan: ACT Emergency Services Agency
Andrew Short: Queensland Fire and Emergency Services
Stuart Bartels: Australian Institute of Police Management
Stigma
The resources sector
It's not all about stigma …
Marion’s story
Management as power
Women as minority groups
Why does gender representation have an impact on psychosocial safety?
TechDiversity
The solution
Community-based trauma
Empathy and the leadership lottery
The importance of compassionate people leadership
Empowerment
Social change
CHAPTER 8: Insurance
Validation
The legal framework
Employer contact with injured workers
The challenge
Denial
How the
Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act
affects government workers
Which system is the best?
Erin’s story
Policy directives to save money
How and where regulation is enforced
Why the insurance system makes it worse
CHAPTER 9: Prevention
Recovery at work model
How can you innovate for injured workers?
Workers Compensation Claim done?
Now the insurer is involved
Can we fix a long term problem?
Matthew's story
You need a senior leadership focus on mental health
Recipe for Success: The role of the Chief Happiness Officer
Why we need to continuously improve
Supporting people through challenges
You have the tools to be the compassionate leader you want to be
Next Steps: The power of three
Who, what, when, where, why and how
Find your ‘why’
References
End User License Agreement
List of Tables
Chapter 8
Table 8.1: Proportion of serious claims involving mental stress by jurisdic...
Table 8.2: Serious workers' compensation claims and median time lost for men...
Table 8.3: Serious workers' compensation claims and median time lost for all...
List of Illustrations
Chapter 1
Figure 1.1: The impact of toxic cultures on employee psychological wellbeing
Chapter 3
Figure 3.1: Quadrant model. How I outline the different elements for organis...
Chapter 4
Figure 4.1: The Self-Management System
Figure 4.2: Unpacking your self-management system
Guide
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Introduction
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Next Steps: The power of three
References
End User License Agreement
Pages
iii
iv
vii
viii
ix
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
59
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
101
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
how to heal a workplace
Tackle Trauma, Foster Psychological Safety and Boost Happiness at Work
Kerry Howard
First published in 2023 by John Wiley & Sons Australia, LtdLevel 4, 600 Bourke St, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
© Ms Pink Enterprises Pty Ltd 2023
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
ISBN: 978-1-394-15447-0
All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (for example, a fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review), no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, communicated or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All inquiries should be made to the publisher at the address above.
Cover design by WileyCover and internal ‘growth’ image by © Olga Ubirailo/Getty ImagesAuthor Photo: Wilomark Imagery
DisclaimerThe material in this publication is of the nature of general comment only, and does not represent professional advice. It is not intended to provide specific guidance for particular circumstances and it should not be relied on as the basis for any decision to take action or not take action on any matter which it covers. Readers should obtain professional advice where appropriate, before making any such decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the author and publisher disclaim all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any person taking or not taking action based on the information in this publication.
Introduction
As human beings, we spend the majority of our waking adult life at work. Depending on the country that you reside in, your working hours may vary, but even in the most balanced societies, we spend more than one-third of our life at work.
Given that we spend so much time in this environment and our occupation is often a key component to our sense of identity and self-worth, it is essential to our overall functioning in life to be able to operate in a supportive environment. This means a workplace that provides psychological safety and security and affords us a positive sense of our value and contribution. It means a workplace that gives us an opportunity to meet our greatest emotional need: the need for connection.
The global way of working is rapidly changing, and workplaces have devolved and decentralised, fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the pandemic we were seeing this trend in decentralisation, particularly in knowledge industries where a computer and internet access were all employees needed to deliver outcomes. For multinational corporations with employees located in different countries around the world, it posed unique challenges that often required dedicated human resources (HR) teams to ensure worker safety and protect employers from potential legal claims spanning multiple cultures and jurisdictions.
It is rare to find a true multinational corporation that has been able to navigate the competing nuances of culture and expectations to create a truly satisfied, efficient and effective workforce.
There are exceptions, most of them in the technology space (LinkedIn, Google, SpaceX). Reports of high levels of staff satisfaction imply the workplace is a happy and productive one. This may be a reflection on the types of people who are drawn to work in these environments. In the technology field we see high levels of neurodiversity, which brings with it a greater cognitive flexibility and potentially higher tolerance of difference. In the HR field, we see more people who have high levels of emotional intelligence and are, therefore, also more likely to have a higher tolerance for diversity. So, what does that say about other workplaces and occupations?
Embracing difference in the work environment is something that is written into many workplace codes of conduct, but is rarely truly embraced in application. Group dynamics come into play, and many conservative workplaces appreciate diversity, as long as it's packaged in a dark suit and white shirt. Yet every workplace requires a variety of personality types to ensure its people can innovate and find creative solutions to complex challenges.
Difference can be expressed through personality, but it can also be created by action. When a member of the team acts in a way that seems to expose the team to scrutiny, it is not uncommon for the renegade member of the team to be excluded while the rest of the team band together to protect themselves from further ridicule. Psychological constructs around group membership often facilitate this type of behaviour in workplaces, but it can have a significant negative impact on the person who raised the alarm.
How we manage and treat our people at work can be directly linked to managing psychological safety at work. Another example is the type of work that our occupation exposes us to. We know that public safety workers (defence, emergency services, hospital staff) are routinely exposed to traumatic incidents as a direct result of the type of work that they do. In our society we recognise that the incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be disproportionately higher in these sectors than in other industries.
Then there are the sectors exposed to occupational violence, and, surprisingly, these are often the ‘helping’ professions: ambulance officers, nurses and, perhaps unexpectedly, teachers. Ambulance officers and nurses are often on the front line when people are in trouble, potentially under the influence of illicit substances or alcohol, which can expose them to negative behaviours. As occupational groups, the ‘helping’ professions can be significantly impacted by these types of incidents, because the nature of the work tends to attract quite empathic people. It can be hard to fathom why you would be hurt while trying to help someone — quite a different psychological position than those in the armed services, for example.
To most people's surprise, we see that teachers are significantly impacted by violence in schools. The rates of workers compensation claims by teachers for occupational violence is almost as high as emergency services workers.1 For similar reasons to our medical personnel, teaching generally attracts a more empathic and caring personality, and like anyone who is exposed to violence they also struggle with these incidents.
There are multiple ways that people may feel unsafe or disempowered in the workplace. My aim in this book is to help you understand why these situations occur, and provide clear guidance as to what you can do to support your people to tackle trauma and foster psychological safety. By taking a proactive approach to the challenges that can arise in the workplace, you will improve the culture of your workplace, be it large or small. Ensuring your people feel valued and supported by their employer will lead to increased satisfaction and boost the general feeling of happiness at work.
Part IWorkplace Culture
CHAPTER 1What is workplace culture?: Why it’s the key to profitability
I am often asked why I focus on trying to help organisations change their culture, and I point out that we spend the majority of our waking adult life at work. If we are constantly exposed to a toxic workplace culture, the chances of us being able to operate at our best and live our lives ‘full of awesome’ is pretty slim.
Conversely, if employees are experiencing mental health issues, for example, then their behaviour in the workplace is not going to be balanced or reasonable at all times. When employees feel safe enough to share their mental health issues, we can provide support for that team member. However we all experience difficulties in life, and we often don't recognise that they impact our mental health, and we don't label them as such.
I am sure that, like me, you have grown up in a world that told you that you needed to maintain a separation between work and life — don't let your personal problems cross over into your working life, and vice versa — but it's not only unreasonable to expect this type of compartmentalisation, it's damn near impossible to achieve!
As human beings we have many complex feelings and emotional experiences that impact our mood; we are not robots. We cannot merely switch ourselves into ‘work mode’ and switch off the fact that we are having relationship problems, or our parents or child are sick. There are many occupations where it can feel like we readily switch into ‘work mode’. We see this in occupations that require uniforms; we put on the uniform and our behaviour changes, but it doesn't mean that the stress of our home life stops affecting us.
The same is true in reverse: our experiences at work can spill over into our mood and behaviour at home. When we are unhappy at work, it places pressure on our home life. Whether it's financial pressure, time pressure or other excessive work expectations, it is impossible to separate the impact of our working and home lives — and unreasonable of us to expect that they can be separated!
The one constant reflection that I hear from staff who have had a difficult time, but managed to work through it, is that they had a supportive supervisor. The perception of ‘support’ changes depending on the workplace, but it is essentially where the staff member felt that their challenges in life were seen by their supervisor to be a temporary glitch in their work performance, and they were provided the space to get through the challenge and get on with life, without it affecting their working life.
In essence, their situation was appropriately viewed as ‘temporary’ and they were trusted to get back to full capacity as soon as practicable. The important element here is ‘trust’.
What is workplace culture?
Many people believe that they know what the term ‘workplace culture’ means, but for clarity, I am going to define it here and explain what it looks like in practicality. Workplace culture is the environment that you create for your employees. It plays a powerful role in determining their satisfaction with their career, their interpersonal relationships and their career progression. The culture of your workplace is determined by a combination of the company's leadership and the employees’ values, beliefs and attitudes, which translate into behaviours and interactions that contribute to the relational environment of your workplace. In general, these are the intrinsic rules that govern interpersonal connections in the workplace between peers.
Workplace culture should align with the company's mission and vision statements, and be supported by policies and procedures that are designed to ensure the workplace functions effectively and achieves its overall goals. However, when I am called into an organisation to support cultural change, the number one problem is that the workplace culture has veered off track and is no longer aligned with the mission or vision.
Workplace culture can be strongly impacted by the leadership, and we often see issues develop in the culture when there is a misalignment between the leader, the company's mission and vision, and the staff. There can be several reasons for this misalignment, but not addressing the misalignment is a sure-fire way to create a toxic workplace culture.
Workplace culture is the environment that you create for your employees
Toxic workplace culture
We have all heard the term ‘toxic culture’ thrown around, but I will outline what I mean by this term. Toxicity in the workplace develops from a pattern of combined behaviours that are counterproductive. When promoted by toxic leadership, a toxic culture incorporates six specific behaviours:
passive hostility
shaming
indifference
team sabotage
negativity
exploitation.
2
Toxic cultures are known to promote attitudes that adversely impact employee psychological wellbeing (see figure 1.1). Psychological wellbeing is also defined by six attributes:
autonomy
environment management
personal growth
positive relationships
having life goals
self-acceptance.
3
Figure 1.1: The impact of toxic cultures on employee psychological wellbeing
In one particular study that considered the impact of a toxic workplace culture on psychological wellbeing, it determined, not surprisingly, that wellbeing is lower in employees who are exposed to toxic workplace cultures. What might be surprising is that almost 80 per cent of workplaces met the criteria for toxicity!3
The researchers identified that there are three main strategies adopted by employees who are confronted with these toxic work environments:
Active rejection:
These employees are the whistle-blowers, the fighters against injustice, who take action against the toxicity of the workplace and see quitting as the last resort. These employees represent over one-third of the workforce, and you will read some of their stories in this book.
Passive rejection:
These employees are those who tend to hide their dissatisfaction from the perpetrators (usually the leadership) while sharing their dissatisfaction with their peers. These employees represent a staggering 40 per cent of the workforce and perceive that
all
workplaces are toxic, so they remain passively disengaged because they are pessimistic. They believe that it is better the devil you know, than the devil you don't!
Escapees:
These are the ones who decide that it is easier to get out as quickly as possible, in some cases leaving the professional field. These employees represent the remaining 27 per cent of the workforce and often react swiftly to toxic experiences of blatant harassment, threats and intimidation.
Employees with higher levels of psychological wellbeing are more likely to escape when the organisation toxicity worsens, whereas employees with the lowest psychological wellbeing are the most likely to become passive rejectors.4
It isn't that difficult to see why these numbers need our attention. If 80 per cent of workplaces have a moderate to high toxicity, and 40 per cent of those employees are passively disengaged, 33 per cent are actively disrupting the workplace and 27 per cent are actively looking for work elsewhere, then it really isn't hard to understand why actively leading to reduce toxicity in the workplace should be the major goal of all compassionate leaders. The disenfranchisement of our human resources is leading to significantly reduced productivity, and this is silently eroding the profitability of businesses globally.
The Great Resignation
The Great Resignation: The mass exodus from the work environment observed post-pandemic. The term was coined by Anthony Klotz, a professor of management at University College London's School of Management, in May 2021.
The phenomena of the Great Resignation was first observed in 2021 following the disruption to the way that we work thanks to the pandemic. In July 2021, a Gallup Poll revealed that almost half the American working population was actively looking for new roles. Business is facing a staggeringly high resignation rate and record numbers of unfilled positions.5 The United States quit rate is at its highest in over 20 years, hovering at almost 3 per cent since early 2021.6
Quit rate: The number of employees who voluntarily resign, as opposed to as the result of redundancy or being fired.
There are several reasons for this phenomenon, but the primary reason is that the impact of the pandemic on people's freedom meant that their discontent with life was linked with the employer that they were connected with at the time of the strongest lockdowns and control over their movements in society.
In Australia, we saw less of this movement until 2022, primarily due to the prolonged lockdowns, which affected our general sense of security and limited the number of people changing roles due to the need for stable employment. The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ annual job mobility survey shows that Australians are on the move at their highest rate in over a decade: 9.5 per cent in 2022, up 2 per cent from 2021. Not surprisingly, the highest change was seen in Victoria, usually a reasonably stable state in terms of job mobility. As the state that experienced the most prolonged lockdowns around the pandemic, it went from 7.2 per cent in 2021 to a whopping 10.1 per cent in 2022.7
In other countries like the United Kingdom, the statistics around economic inactivity give a clearer picture about the impact of the pandemic on the labour market. Since the start of 2021, there have been some alarming changes around economic inactivity (people who are not actively engaged in the workforce due to ill health, retirement, study, etc), despite an overall decline in the total number from 411 863 to 378 073, which on the surface would appear to be good news, certainly that is how the UK Government is espousing these numbers. However, when we dig into the data, we see some significant and alarming trends.8
What the data is telling us and how it affects your business
From the beginning of 2021 until May 2022 in the UK, we see sickness rates are out of control: temporary sick rates showed a 740 per cent increase from 3648 to 30 640, and long-term sick rates more than tripled from 67 487 to 208 655. At the same time, fewer people are studying, with student numbers declining by two-thirds — from 339 380 down to 139 690 — and more people are retiring, with rates skyrocketing from 6851 to 63 174 — a 1022 per cent increase! Although the overall trend now looks like it's improving, there are much higher numbers of people who are unable to participate in the workforce due to health concerns, and many who are opting out of the labour market and retiring early. The only real positive is in the number of discouraged workers, those who were not looking for work because they believed that no jobs were available — the number declined massively from 57 158 to 21 958, an incredible 138 per cent decrease!
So what does all this labour market data actually have to do with your business? Everything! Recruitment specialists are talking about the fact that it is now an employee's market, at a time when many industries are struggling with the skills gap between the available prospects and the requirements of the role. One of the biggest challenges with fewer people studying is that we already have a skills shortage. Recruitment has become much more of a ‘take what's available’ for the employer, leading to some significant challenges in an under-skilled labour market with unrealistic expectations of its worth.
Employees are seeking roles with employers that offer them more wellbeing support and greater flexibility than ever before. There are several reasons why we ended up in this situation, but realistically, the labour market has been decimated by the departure of the Baby Boomers, many of whom retired through the pandemic, leaving a major skills shortage in the market. Most organisations are now led by Gen X (born 1965–1980), with Gen Y/Millennials (born 1981–1996) and Gen Z/iGen/Zoomers (1997–2012) the main players in the workforce.
It’s an employee market and they want greater support for mental health and real balance between home and work
What does our generation have to do with our work ethic?
In Western societies, our ‘generation’ defines many things about our psychological and social dimensions, and is expressed in commonly held beliefs or views of the world that are shaped by the social experiences of each generation. There are two overlapping theories about how generations form. The ‘pulse-rate hypothesis’ gives rise to the naming conventions and timeframes that we are most familiar with, and essentially claims that each generation develops a particular ‘peer personality’ based on the time period in which each one reaches adulthood.9 Social scientists follow the ‘imprint hypothesis’ of generations, which indicates that the specific historical events that are experienced during our early lives shape our outlook on the world and differentiate us from our parents.10
In broad terms, our current society and, by default, our workplaces are influenced by the current ‘living’ cohorts who are still participating in the labour market: Baby Boomers, Gen X, Gen Y and Gen Z. In terms of population numbers, the Baby Boomers were the largest generational cohort until they gave birth to Gen Y. Most Baby Boomers are in or looking at retirement, so the majority of modern workplaces are filled with members of Gen X, Gen Y and Gen Z. We need to actively manage the expectations of Gen Z and prepare for the influx of Gen Alpha in the next five years.
Baby Boomers
Most Baby Boomers were raised by parents whose lives had been impacted by the Great Depression. As such, they were often raised with austerity, and subject to strict rules and social obligations until the emergence of the 1960s counterculture. These varied experiences really affected how they parented Gen Y. There was a significant increase in expectations of university education, and corresponding expectations around success in the occupational sphere.
As workers, Baby Boomer males align with a strong work ethic: diligence and dedication to an employer; most of their careers were spent with a single employer. Baby Boomer females tended to work outside the home to bring in additional income once children were at school and society allowed it. In the 1960s, many young Baby Boomer women were forced to quit their jobs once they married. As such, Gen Y was raised by a generation of mothers who stayed home until they went to school, and then engaged in the workforce, often part time, usually to be able to provide more for their children.
Generation X
Gen X is the generation that saw mothers entering the workforce in a time before the advent of formalised childcare or after-school care. Higher rates of divorce meant that this was the first generation that experienced high levels of sole parenting, and this was usually done by the mother. They learned how to fend for themselves because they had to; so they learned to solve problems. As a result, they were open to thinking outside the box.
The 80s saw the rise of music videos and subcultures develop around punk, metal and goth. They were exposed to widespread health concerns with AIDS, were the first generation to engage with technology and were more likely to get a university degree than previous generations. Gen X women believed that they could have a career and a family and sacrificed a lot to achieve both.
They embraced individualism and are known for being entrepreneurial and productive in the workplace. They are committed to their profession, not necessarily the employer, and they look to change career focus every ten years or so. They tend to get on with things because they were raised to be self-sufficient.
Generation Y
The social changes that impacted the Baby Boomers through the 1960s really shaped how they would parent their offspring. As a result, Gen Y were raised to believe that they could achieve anything they set their mind to — that success was theirs for the taking, they just had to ask for it. As their mothers self-sacrificed to give them more, Gen Y started to develop more egocentricity than earlier generations as they were given a lot of support from their parents, coupled with a lot of expectation.
This generation saw the movement from personal computing to mobile technology, and the emergence of new technologies and social media through their teen years, which further enhanced their egocentricity. They are known for being ambitious and expect to rise rapidly up the corporate ladder, while also expecting a reasonable work-life balance. Gen Y was the first generation to expect that they could have it all, and that they should be supported to do so by their parents and their employers.
Gen Y are creative and bring a stronger entrepreneurial focus to the workplace than Gen X — this is the generation that has created the notion of the digital nomad. They seek adventure and success — so in the workplace they thrive on creative and reactive work environments.
Digital nomad: A person who works online in various locations while travelling, rather than in one fixed location.
Generation Z
As parents, Gen X were more inclined to encourage their children to be self-sufficient, but they were also more aware of the dangers in society, so they have tended to be more over-protective of their Gen Z children. Gen Z are the first generation recognised as true digital natives due to their access to portable electronic devices, and have been identified as ‘technoholics’.
Gen Z grew up without a lot of adult supervision, similar to their parents, but they had more access to digital entertainment, so they didn't play outside as much. They weren't allowed to get around on their own due to ‘stranger danger’, and they didn't engage in risky play, so they struggle with assessing risk and problem-solving.
Gen Z were afforded more awareness and acceptance of mental health challenges, and their parents were often too busy working to effectively manage these challenges with their children. Due to their digital exposure, Gen Z are the most egocentric generation we have seen so far, defining their self-worth by their social media likes, resulting in poorer self-perception. This generation has a declining attention span and, arguably, their IQ is falling. In humans, an IQ test is designed to assess several abilities — reasoning, problem-solving, perception of relationships between things and the storage and retrieval of information. As they are no longer required to read and retain information, the development of Gen Z’s other abilities will be impaired.
Gen Z were also raised in a school system that tried to level the playing field by not grading students against each other; rather they sought to grade students on their own merit. As a result, this generation didn't develop resilience around failure. Their exposure to digital products established a dopamine source that has fuelled their brains from adolescence, as a result they prefer to relax by zoning out watching movies or social media and engage socially by gaming online with friends they have never actually met. This new digital social world has proven to be beneficial in the absence of real-world peer connections, but we have to ask if they had spent more time in the outside world as children, whether this need would have been met through actual friendships.
The next generation are currently beginning their adolescence and the experiences of Gen Z are set to be magnified in Gen Alpha. Gen Z is a young workforce that struggles with focus and attention, can't solve problems, has a strong understanding of mental health and awareness of their rights, but little resilience, neatly wrapped up in extreme egocentricity. This means that we have about five years to resolve these challenges before the next generation of young adults enters the workforce. Ironically, it is the Gen X leaders who will finally have to parent their children in the workforce.
It's not all bad, the creativity and diversification that has developed over the past 60 years has not only changed the way we work across society, but also how we parent and live.
Where to from here?
The implications of industrialisation have meant that as machinery and technology improved, the nature of our work as humans has changed from predominantly physical labour to knowledge labour — completely changing the nature of our workplaces. The changing nature of our society has changed the way we eat, socialise and raise families. The pandemic has really narrowed the focus of these changes and given rise to the reality that most knowledge workers can work from anywhere with a laptop and an internet connection. That doesn't necessarily mean that working this way is good for us socially, but it is the reality of what ‘can’ be done.
Time-poor Gen X parents are now having to manage the results of their parenting approach in their Gen Z staff: teaching them problem-solving skills, how to assess risks and providing meaningful work that is ‘exciting’ enough to keep them from becoming disengaged. As a generation, Gen Z can focus more on problems and struggle with solutions because their time-poor parents fixed all their problems for them. They can lack motivation for things that don't serve their own needs and they often struggle to take initiative.
Now, I know I am making broad, sweeping statements here that many might disagree with or be offended by. Rather than seeking to be overly negative, I believe that it is important that leaders understand the societal challenges that we have to manage in the modern workplace because these challenges in managing staff are widespread and cross-cultural.
I am also speaking about myself here as a Gen X parent with Gen Z children and staff. Although I appreciate their knowledge of technology and their adaptability to change, at times I feel like a parent in the workplace, and that can be as frustrating as when I was actually parenting adolescents.
I was also a sole parent who was incredibly supportive of my children around their mental health. I raised them to value money and have a good work ethic, but I continued to support them financially in one form or another until they completed their studies and started working full time, which has only happened recently. My children are both in their late 20s and I have been paying for their private health insurance and medical expenses — although they are on notice that this will stop once they are established with their full-time income.
Why did I do it? A combination of means and awareness of the importance of good health and education is probably behind this approach. They have worked part time to support themselves around studies and their education was important to me, so I felt it was important to support their health needs. However, I have other friends who have allowed their children to remain at home and disengaged from the world, while they supported them financially because their children struggled with resilience. We have spent their whole lives trying to protect them from the big, bad world and created a generation whose fallback is learned helplessness.
The intergenerational changes in our industrialised world have given rise to a broad variety of expectations in our people. Many workplace cultures have become toxic in the wake of the growing egocentricity of Gen Y and Gen Z. Don't get me wrong, Boomers and Gen X had their fair share of big egos, but they were more scattered across society and based on the social tenets of success.
The internet has given rise to social media and online gaming, and provided the perception that what I say or do is seen by many people and they are all interested in it. It's a one-way communication medium with few feedback loops, with the exception of likes or followers. This has given rise to the notion of ‘fame’ for no real reason except that people are watching. That is why the number one career goal of Gen Z and Gen Alpha is to become an ‘influencer’. They honestly believe that the world is interested in their opinion and their lives, so much so that their mood can be altered by the changing number of likes they have on Instagram. We have to understand their unrealistic expectations because we have to learn to help them adapt to keep them engaged in our workplace.
The challenge of building focus and resilience
There are multiple examples from organisations that I have worked with in the past couple of years that highlight the issue with this lack of resilience in Gen Z and the over-protective parenting of Gen X. A plumbing company I worked with were having a lot of difficulty with retaining apprentices — at the first hurdle of having to push themselves through a problem, the young person would often walk off the job and never return.
One story that stands out in my mind was about a plumber who was responsible for installing 200 toilets on a large construction job. His reasonably new apprentice was going to help and what better time to start than with 200 toilets to practice on. So the plumber demonstrates the first toilet, he demonstrates again with the second toilet but asks the apprentice to get more hands on. The apprentice takes the lead with the third toilet with the plumber supporting them. By the fourth toilet, the apprentice is installing it under instruction from the plumber — the first four toilets have taken them two hours to complete. The plumber leaves the apprentice to install them himself with instructions to come and ask if he has any concerns.
The plumber heads off to install another toilet and comes back when he is finished to check in on the apprentice. He is slow, but progressing, and so the plumber gets on with installing a couple more toilets before checking back in — the apprentice is having lunch. After lunch, the plumber checks in with the apprentice once he has finished toilet number five. It looks pretty good. It took him three hours, but the plumber reassures him that he will get faster. The plumber goes and installs another four toilets and it's the end of the day. The plumber returns to find the apprentice on his phone; toilet number six hasn't been started. When questioned, the apprentice said that he can't remember how to do it. The plumber tries to reassure him that he will show him again in the morning. The apprentice says that his Mum is coming to pick him up.
The plumber proceeds to go and collect his tools and packs up for the day, and as he is about to leave, the apprentice's Mum turns up and confronts the plumber about the fact that he is placing too much pressure on her son to perform and he won't be returning to the job. She quit for him! I wish this was a rare event, but with Gen X parents it is common.
Mindfully parenting through the challenges
I am a Gen X parent, but I believe I have a bit more awareness of these generational challenges. As my children have grown older, I take the time to teach them how to speak up for themselves, even when I want to step in and fight for them. Modern parents have been so influenced by the ‘rights’ of the individual to be treated with respect and with fairness that when we anticipate a level of unfairness, we jump in to protect them a little too often — as a result, these children haven't developed resilience.
