Inbound Marketing and SEO E-Book

Rand Fishkin

• Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
• Kategorie: Fachliteratur
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 404

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013

Beschreibung

Learn from the leading resource on the latest inbound marketing techniques

As the SEO industry undergoes a shift and Google continues to change its algorithm, successful SEO practitioners need to increase their knowledge of a wide range of inbound marketing channels. The Moz Blog is the go-to place for the latest thought leadership on the shifts in inbound marketing and SEO. This book cherry-picks and updates the most popular articles for the key inbound marketing disciplines, mixing them with some brand-new essays. Rand Fishkin and Thomas Høgenhaven have produced a masterfully edited anthology packed with information to provide the best possible insight into these marketing channels. The popular Moz blog is a top resource for cutting-edge information on SEO techniques:

• Co-compiled and co-edited by Moz CEO and co-founder Rand Fishkin, this book is an anthology of articles selected to provide the best possible overview of current SEO and inbound marketing techniques and trends
• Covers channels of online marketing, content marketing, social media, outreach, conversion rate optimization, and analytics, as well as search engine optimization
• Focuses on leveraging existing platforms like social media sites and community for inbound marketing success

Inbound Marketing and SEO is a must-have for marketers in today's online world.

Leseprobe

Inbound Marketing and SEO

INBOUND MARKETING AND SEO

INSIGHTS FROM THE MOZ BLOG

Rand Fishkin and Thomas Høgenhaven

This edition first published 2013

© 2013 SEOMoz

Registered office

John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom

For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com.

The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.

Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Trademarks: Wiley and the Wiley logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley and Sons, Inc. and/ or its affiliates in the United States and/or other countries, and may not be used without written permission. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in the book.

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

ISBN 978-1-118-55155-4 (pbk); ISBN 978-1-118-55156-1 (ebk); ISBN 978-1-118-55157-8 (ebk); ISBN 978-1-118-55158-5 (ebk)

Set in 10 pt. Minion Pro by Indianapolis Composition Services

Printed in the United States by Bind-Rite

Dedication

To the Moz community—You rock! Thank you for helping to build an extraordinary organization.To the remarkable writers and marketers who helped make this book possible—Thank you for your generous contributions.Special thanks to Ashley Tate and Christy Correll—You made this book possible.

—Rand and Thomas

To the Moz team—My thanks; I feel lucky, thrilled, and humbled to share this journey with you.To Geraldine—I'm sorry for all the nights blogging and writing have kept me away from you; your love and support means the world to me.

—Rand

To Marie—For making everything look brighter, day after day.

—Thomas

Publisher's Acknowledgements

Some of the people who helped bring this book to market include the following:

Editorial and Production

VP Consumer and Technology Publishing Director: Michelle Leete

Associate Director–Book Content Management: Martin Tribe

Associate Publisher: Chris Webb

Executive Commissioning Editor: Craig Smith

Associate Commissioning Editor: Ellie Scott

Editorial Manager: Jodi Jensen

Senior Project Editor: Sara Shlaer

Moz Content Editor: Christy Correll

Moz Project Manager: Ashley Tate

Editorial Assistant: Annie Sullivan

Marketing

Associate Marketing Director: Louise Breinholt

Marketing Manager: Lorna Mein

Senior Marketing Executive: Kate Parrett

Marketing Assistant: Tash Lee

Composition Services

Senior Project Coordinator: Kristie Rees

Compositor: Erin Zeltner

Proofreaders: Melissa Cossell, Wordsmith Editorial

Indexer: BIM Indexing & Proofreading Services

Proceeds

All proceeds of this book will be donated to Vittana (www.vittana.org).

Vittana's mission is to graduate a generation beyond poverty through the power of education. Vitanna enables anyone with $25 to lend directly to ambitious students in the developing world. 100 percent of lender money goes directly to the students, and more than 99 percent of students repay their loans upon graduation.

Introduction

By Rand Fishkin and Thomas Høgenhaven

The term inbound marketing was first used by Brian Halligan and Dharmesh Shah in their seminal 2009 book, but the concept has been around much longer. As far back as 1999, Seth Godin referred to the same concept under a different name in his blog: “Permission marketing is the privilege (not the right) of delivering anticipated, personal, and relevant messages to people who actually want to get them.”

Over the past few years, many marketers who focus on organic channels like search engine optimization (SEO), social media, and content marketing have started using the phrase inbound marketing to describe the combination of these channels in their roles and responsibilities.

So why are marketers now turning to inbound marketing? Reasons abound, but two in particular are both timely and relevant. First, Google—the world leader in search, with more than 90 percent of the global market share—has evolved its algorithmic considerations massively in the past five years. Google has rolled out new types of search results, cracked down on spam, upgraded its ability to detect and remove low-quality content, become faster and fresher, dramatically dampened many historic SEO factors, and renewed its focus on promoting great brands that produce superlative web content.

Second, practitioners of SEO have evolved. We realize that SEO is a tactic, not a strategy. We realize SEO needs to be used as part of a broader set of marketing tools. In order to succeed in SEO, a multichannel approach is necessary. This book is all about how to perform in a new era of inbound marketing.

SEO Is Changing

Search and SEO are changing. Google is hitting suspicious-looking link networks, devaluing directories, and increasingly penalizing sites with highly dubious link profiles. Underhanded tactics to rank well in the search engine results pages (SERPs) no longer work.

Optimizing a site used to be about getting to the number one spot in a SERP and staying there. Ranking number one is no longer the only important factor. Click distribution is different than it used to be; it's influenced by rich snippets like star ratings, number of reviews, price, author photo, video preview, publication date, and social annotations. Optimizing your author photo might increase click-through rate (CTR) more than moving up one or two places in the search results will.

Moreover, Google wants the “fat head” keywords—the small group of keywords that typically drive the most traffic—to themselves. Try searching for credit card offers, flight tickets, and new movie titles. The SERPs are filled with other Google-owned products, which makes sense for its business. This makes it more important than ever before for you to have keywords in the “chunky middle” (more descriptive terms that drive fewer visits individually, but large amounts of traffic overall) and the “long tail” (the many, more specific terms that may only drive a few visits each, but can drive a lot of traffic in aggregate).

In many ways, though, SEO is still SEO. Search engines still need accessibility help in order to crawl, index, and rank the content in the correct way. This requires logical information architecture, correct use of meta tags, implementation of relevant schema markup, and use of sitemaps, as well as correct use of Google Webmaster Tools and Bing Webmaster Center. You still need links to rank for competitive keywords. You still need to conduct proper keyword research. And you still need to produce content that can be understood by humans and robots. Delighting users has always worked pretty well, and will become increasingly more important as the search engines get smarter.

From SEO To Inbound Marketing

SEO is often declared “dead”—but that concept is just silly. People will always need to retrieve information online, and search is a powerful way to do this. Search and SEO are very much alive, and it's much more fruitful to see search as a part of a bigger marketing mix.

Many of us have suffered SEO tunnel vision, but SEO does not exist in a vacuum. It's increasingly difficult to succeed in SEO when using this channel in isolation. That's where the multichannel approach comes in: Google constantly rewards companies who provide good products, user experience (UI), branding, content, and conversion rate optimization (CRO).

Some SEOs are skeptical of the conceptual expansion of SEO to inbound marketing. We hope to reduce some of this skepticism by briefly addressing two of these critiques:

Critique 1: Inbound marketing is just a new name for SEO. No, it is not. SEO is a tactic. Inbound marketing is a strategy. Inbound marketing is an umbrella term for many marketing channels, whereas SEO is a channel in itself. Some consider social media, content, analytics, and CRO to be part of SEO, but the majority of social media and analytics professionals will hardly characterize themselves as SEOs. In fact, you can do inbound marketing without doing SEO. Inbound marketing is not a new name for SEO, but a name for organic, earned marketing.

Critique 2: Inbound marketing is a branded term used to market the likes of HubSpot and Moz. The term is used and evangelized by companies such as HubSpot and Moz, but we'd be just as happy using terms like organic marketing, permission marketing, and earned media. But marketers are not using any single one of these terms, making it harder to use them broadly. Inbound marketing is rapidly becoming the accepted industry term to sum up all the channels that bring in customers organically.

Inbound Marketing

So, what is inbound marketing? In a general sense, we see it as things you can do on the web that earn traffic and attention, but don't directly cost money.

Don't buy. Don't beg. Don't bludgeon. Inbound marketing is all about earning attention and love. This is often a superior way of marketing, simply because people prefer inbound channels to outbound. According to Google, 82 percent of clicks in the SERPs go to organic results and 18 percent go to pay-per-click (PPC) ads. Less than 1 percent of clicks on Twitter go to promoted tweets. The best and brightest Facebook ads are lucky to amass a 2 percent CTR.

There is no single way to do inbound marketing, and it's not about being everywhere. Your goal should not be to have a presence on all channels, but to really be present where your audience exists. For example, if your target audience is 55+ year-old men, Pinterest might not be the right channel to invest in. It's ultimately about selecting the channels that fulfill your strategic goals the best, and selecting the channels that give the highest ROI.

The channels with the highest ROI are often those others don't invest in—there is so much potential there! This is what Rand calls the short men, tall women rationale: most men are interested in short women, while most women are interested in tall men. Consequently, there are many single short men and tall women who are very attractive based on other parameters. The smart singles, therefore, pursue those tall women and short men the majority tends to ignore. This rationale is one of the reasons inbound marketing works so well: for each dollar spent on inbound channels, eight dollars are spent on paid channels.

Inbound marketing is not free; it takes time and money to create and distribute phenomenal content. But it's often a more cost-effective marketing strategy than paid marketing. We are not arguing that paid marketing doesn't have its place in the world, but the point of this book is to show you how effective and efficient inbound marketing can be.

Investing in Inbound Marketing for the Long Term

The best way to build a brand is to be truly remarkable, recognizable, and authentic—and to provide the world with answers to the question “Why?” Successful inbound marketing plays a pivotal role in branding, but takes time and effort. Don't invest in SEO—or any other inbound channel—for the short term. Like all well-planned strategies, inbound is a long-term investment.

Inbound marketing helps with brand building, and having a brand helps inbound marketing. It is a positive spiral that rewards those who are already successful, as is illustrated in Chapter 11, “The Rich Get Richer: True in SEO, Social + All Organic Marketing.” As Eric Schmidt said in 2008, “Brands are the solution, not the problem.” If you are a good brand, SEO tends to be the solution, not the problem. Through Google, brands receive preferential treatment. Brands get increased visibility in SERPs, and penalties and filters increasingly target unbranded sites. This makes sense, for familiarity breeds trust. You probably recognize this from your own searches. When looking for that new long blue nightgown, you are probably clicking the link to Amazon or Macy's, not the link to longbluenightgowns.biz.

Building your site and marketing efforts for a long-term ROI also solves the old dilemma between using black hat tactics (deceptive or questionable SEO practices that don't follow search engine guidelines) and white hat tactics (best practices to build an experience that's actually valuable to customers and crawl-able by the search engines). Truly remarkable brands do not take the low road or use aggressive marketing tactics. They don't need to.

Why Read This Book?

SEOs are upgrading their job title to inbound marketer, which comes with responsibilities that include a wide array of channels. New marketers are entering this fast-paced industry all the time. While The Moz Blog is a rich resource for inbound marketers, it can be hard to get an overview of the field from its many hundreds of posts. This book curates the best of the blog over the past few years. All of the blog posts have been reassessed and many of them have been updated for relevant content. We hope this book will help you make a steady investment in inbound marketing that gives you good returns over the long run.

ABOUT MOZ

SEOmoz started as an SEO consulting company in 2004 and later became a leading provider of SEO software. In 2013, SEOmoz transitioned its brand to Moz, expanding its product line to include search, social, and content optimization within a single platform, Moz Analytics. Moz's mission is to create products that streamline the inbound marketing process while staying true to the company's TAGFEE* values, giving marketers everywhere a better way to do inbound.

*The TAGFEE code sets the standard that all work and content produced by Moz is Transparent and Authentic, Generous, Fun, Empathetic, and Exceptional.

Part I: SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION

By Ruth Burr

Search engine optimization has been around for about as long as search engines have. It's hard to imagine SEO before Google with its current market share domination, but as early as the mid-1990s, marketers were thinking about how to make their products as findable as possible on the web.

The Birth of SEO

In the early days of search, Yahoo! and its cohorts were run like Yellow Pages services: website owners submitted their sites for indexing, and search engines did their best to match up pages with search queries. Most ranking criteria centered on keyword density—did a given keyword show up in prominent places on the page? How many times did it occur in the page's content?

It wasn't long before website owners caught on to search algorithms and began to tailor their sites to meet search engines' criteria. Search engine optimization was born! This meant that the first generation of web marketers had new tools to help get their content in front of the growing consumer base that was the Internet. It also meant that they could, through reverse-engineering the algorithm, easily create hundreds of pages that ranked for search terms without passing much value along to the searcher.

These were the first skirmishes in what would become a battle that continues to this day. Search engines try to create spam-proof algorithms that surface the best content to their users, while marketers struggle to get their sites to the top of the rankings—sometimes, by any means possible.

As weaknesses in their algorithms continued to be exploited, search engines began to look beyond individual web pages to off-page criteria like links. It was around this time that Google came on the scene, and changed everything.

Life After Google

Google's algorithm was based on a concept called PageRank, which weighed on-page factors against value passed from page to page via links. With PageRank, a link to a webpage becomes a “vote” for that page. It's a form of social proof: the more people who agree that a site is worthwhile, the more credibility that site has.

Google quickly amassed a huge market share, edging out smaller competitors like AltaVista and toppling Yahoo!'s dominion over the search engine space. As more and more people turned to Google to shop, play, and find information, the Google SERPs (search engine results pages) became the place you had to be if you wanted to succeed online. In 2013, comScore reported that Google had 67 percent of the U.S. search engine market share, trailed by Microsoft Bing and Yahoo! with 16.5 percent and 12.1 percent, respectively (http://mz.cm/XOG96n). Eager to reach customers on the web, more and more businesses are turning to SEO as a major revenue stream.

As SEO grew as a practice, Google built Google Webmaster Central and Google Webmaster Tools. Now site owners and SEOs could hear directly from Google about new developments and get some hints about what they should or shouldn't be doing to rank well. The algorithm is still more shrouded in secrecy than not, but Google Webmaster Tools does provide some good diagnostic tools to help site owners maintain search-friendly sites.

The modern SERPs look very different than they did at Google's inception, when the top 10 pages were listed as 10 blue links on a white page. Since then, Google has integrated its News, Video, Images, Local, and other vertical searches into one SERP format called Universal Search. It's started utilizing users' search histories, IP addresses, and social media activity to tailor search results to individuals. Google is also constantly experimenting with different numbers of results, new result and ad formats, and even a Direct Answers service that displays the answer to a question like “How many tablespoons in a cup” directly on the SERP, no click needed. To be successful, it's important for today's SEOs to keep abreast of the latest changes.

Cracking Down

As Google rose to ascendancy in the search engine market, attempts to exploit the algorithm cropped up as fast as Google could squash them down. With updates to Google's algorithm coming every few months, new ways to game the system had plenty of time to take effect before the next crackdown.

That all changed in 2010 with Google Caffeine, an update that marked the beginning of more frequent updates to the algorithm. Now Google is making slight tweaks to the algorithm almost every day, with frequent larger changes as well.

It had been a long-held axiom in the search world that “Content is King.” Without at least some text content on a page, it was very difficult to show search engines what a page was about at all, let alone that it was unique enough to rank. However, this meant that hundreds and thousands of sites on the web were shoehorning small amounts of unnecessary, keyword-stuffed text onto pages that didn't really need it. Additionally, huge content sites sprang up with page upon page of content designed to rank for queries but not provide real answers, instead using content to draw users in to a page full of ads.

In 2011, Google released a major update called Panda. Google Panda targeted this “thin content,” looking for more robust signals that content was relevant, unique, and valuable to users. Google has confirmed that Panda is an ongoing algorithmic “check” that is run periodically to target new thin content.

While inbound links have remained a valuable signal for site authority, they were also one of the most frequently manipulated. In 2012, Google released the Penguin update, designed to target “unnatural” links such as links from directories and links that webmasters had surreptitiously paid for.

One major upheaval as a result of Penguin was the changing focus on link anchor text. Google had long named keyword-rich anchor text in inbound links as an indicator of quality, but eventually also found that a high percentage of inbound links with keyword-rich anchor text (as opposed to the name of the website or generic text like “click here”) was also a sign of an unnatural link profile. Like Panda, Penguin is a periodic fix that Google runs to catch new offenders.

Panda and Penguin impacted countless websites. Companies who had had search engine success for years suddenly found themselves scrambling. In the wake of these updates, the SEO community has had a renewed focus on “white hat” SEO—that is, implementing solid business practices to create quality websites within search guidelines, rather than resorting to tricks or loopholes. For more on this, see Chapter 1, “White Hat SEO: It F@$#ing Works.” 

How Search Engines Make Money

When learning how to rank in search engines, it's helpful to remember that search engines aren't public services; they're businesses, out there to make money. Google's market share is an asset that can be used to sell ads. Sixty-seven percent of the available eyeballs in the U.S. are looking at Google when they're searching, and that's an audience advertisers can't afford to ignore. Charging advertisers to get their ads in front of those eyeballs is what drives Google's bottom line.

What this means to search engine marketers is that Google is going to do everything it can to protect its most valuable asset: its market share. That means that Google will consistently do everything in its power to make sure that people who use Google find what they're looking for. Search engines put a great deal of time, talent, and money into discerning what users want when they search, and which pages don't fulfill those needs.

Tactics That Never Stop Working

Building an “algorithm-proof” website that won't be hurt by the likes of Panda and Penguin means adopting classic white hat techniques that never stop working. These include building an easily-crawled site; creating content meant to engage users; building relationships and communities to encourage content sharing in order to naturally accrue links; and looking at site performance to consistently improve performance. The benefit of this stance is that SEOs can return to focusing on the user and customer, while still showing search engines that we have quality, rank-worthy sites.

The Future of Search

In addition to a lot of volatility in the SERPs, the last couple of years have brought some really exciting opportunities and resources for search marketers. In 2011, Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft all agreed to support structured data through Schema.org. Now we have a hugely expanded ability to give search engines more information about different types of data on our sites, allowing for faster, more thorough parsing of that data (read Chapter 2, “Schema.org: Why You're Behind if You're Not Using It” for more on the power of structured data).

Structured data has also led to “rich snippets” showing in search results, which may contain information about the page's author, pictures from the page, reviews of a product or service, or more. These snippets can result in higher click-through rates on search results, even if they aren't in the coveted top three positions.

The advent of social media platforms has also fundamentally changed the web, and web marketing along with it. In the early days of SEO, content creation online was limited to people who had their own websites or blogs. Social media changed all of that. Today anyone can create content on the Internet, and everyone is creating it—from Facebook statuses to tweets to Tumblrs to Yelp reviews. People are interacting online all day, not only with each other, but with brands and businesses as well.

Search engines see social media activity as a measure of social proof much like links are (hence the saying “Likes are the new links” among SEOs). Google and company aren't about to ignore this vast buffet of data on what people like, how they interact, and what they're looking for—and neither should web marketers. We have so many new opportunities to get our content and products out there and to really engage with consumers. In the modern world of search, businesses need to be participating in conversations around their brands, because they're happening whether the business participates or not.

The most exciting development in SEO has been how much the industry has grown up over the years. SEO has gone from something only a small group of hackers and cutting-edge marketers were doing to a full, legitimate industry. Businesses who might still have been buying Yellow Pages ads five years ago are investing in inbound marketing instead.

Chapter 1: White Hat SEO: It F@$#ing Works

By Rand Fishkin

Editor's Note: This article was originally posted on The Moz Blog in April 2011 in response to an off-site post that dismissed the value of white hat SEO. Since then, Google has released many updates to its search algorithm. Most prominent among the updates are Penguin, which devalues spammy backlinks and over-optimized sites, and Panda (originally launched February 2011 as Panda/Farmer), which hits sites with thin content and link farms hard.

I hate web spam. I hate what it's done to the reputation of hardworking, honest, smart web marketers who help websites earn search traffic. I hate how it's poisoned the acronym SEO, a title I'm proud to wear. I hate that it makes legitimate marketing tactics less fruitful. And I hate, perhaps most of all, when it works.

Here's a search for “buy propecia,” which is a drug I actually take to help prevent hair loss. (My wife doesn't think I'd look very good sans hair.)

Like most search results in the pharma sphere, it's polluted by pages that have artificially inflated their rankings. This is obvious to virtually everyone who's even minimally tech-savvy, and it has three terrible results:

1. Marketers and technologists who observe results like this equate SEO with spamming. If you've read a Hacker News (http://news.ycombinator.com) or StackOverflow (http://stackoverflow.com) thread on the topic, you've undoubtedly seen this perspective.

2. SEOs new to the profession see this and think that whatever these sites are doing is an effective way to earn rankings, and try repeating these tactics (often harming their sites or those of employers/clients in the process).

3. Consumers learn not to trust the search results, killing business value for everyone in the web world.

Spam removes economic and brand value from the search/social/web marketing ecosystem. If you create this kind of junk, at least be honest with yourself—you're directly harming your fellow marketers, online businesses, searchers, and future generations of web users.

In April of 2011, Kris Roadruck wrote a post called “White Hat SEO is a Joke” (www.krisroadruck.com/rants/whitehat-seo-is-a-joke). He was upfront about the fact that his post was intentionally provocative, not entirely truthful and more sensational than authentic. Despite these caveats, I think a response and some clarification about my thoughts on black hat in general are in order. I'm responding less because I think Kris believes it and more because of the surprisingly supportive response his post received in parts of the search community.

Some Points on Kris' Post

Kris begins his article with a personal realization:

I started realizing there were only really 2 kinds of white-hats. The ones complaining about how they were doing everything by the book and getting their asses handed to them by “unethical tactics”, and the ones that were claiming success that didn't belong to them ... because they ... happened to be in a niche that bloggers find interesting or entertaining.

It's easy to preach great content when you have a great subject. But no one gives a shit about non-clog toilets or pulse oximeters or single phase diode bridge rectifiers. Sure you might be able to piece together 1 or 2 bits of link-bait but you can be sure that you aren't going to get the anchor text that you want.

Kris' premise seems compelling and even has elements of truth. Great content does work better in fields where there's more interest from web-savvy site owners. On the whole, though, his proposition is a lie. That lie—that “great content” doesn't work in boring niches—is one told out of laziness, jealousy and contempt. It's told by spammers to other spammers because it glosses over the fact that white hat, legitimate marketing can work well in ANY field, for any site.

How about some examples, you ask? I am happy to provide them.

Editor's Note: These examples refer to the status of the sites in 2011, when this post was originally written.

• Here's Ready for Zero (www.readyforzero.com). It's a Y-Combinator backed startup tackling the horrifically spammy and incredibly boring field of credit card debt relief. They don't rank yet (as they've just launched), but if they invest in SEO, they will. They have the content they need to earn all the links they'll need—a great team, great story, great investors and the right product. If I were an SEO consultant for a company seeking rankings for debt relief type searches, that's exactly the “great content” I'd recommend.

• Here's one that does rank: Oyster Hotel Reviews (www.oyster.com). Today, Oyster is on the first page for nearly every hotel they've covered, and in position five for the massively competitive phrase “hotel reviews.” (They're also the best listing in the SERPs.)

• Another that ranks well is Pods Moving Company (www.pods.com). It's not the most exciting site in the world, but it's a good idea with good marketing. It's on the first page for “moving company,” another incredibly competitive result. And guess what? I couldn't find any black/gray hat links. No links from bloggers, either.

• Speaking of not exciting, but white hat and “great content,” allow me to introduce you to Ron Hazelton's DIY Home Improvement (www.ronhazelton.com). Ron is a mini-celebrity thanks to a home repair-focused TV show. While his site isn't exactly drawing in the Linkerati, he markets it well and his stuff is good. As a result, Ron's site is #1 for searches like “toilet replacement.”

• Slightly less boring, but more competitive and equally un-blogger friendly, is the world of business invoicing and bill paying. Yet, the gang at Freshbooks (www.freshbooks.com) is taking Page 1 rankings all over the place.

• Sound effects are another unlikely arena for building a big SEO success story. Despite avoiding every black hat tactic leveraged by the typical ringtone spammers, though, Seattle-based Hark.com has kicked serious butt here. They generate millions of visits from more than 750K keyword phrases each month, and they've built a serious brand in an industry rife with manipulation.

• Kris specifically called out bridge rectifiers as being an impossibly boring industry, yet AllAboutCircuits (www.allaboutcircuits.com) shows up on page one for virtually every diode-related search. There's nothing fancy there, either, just great content. Look at the page on rectifier circuits, (http://mz.cm/Y1hNWg). The illustrations are detailed, the content is awesome and they follow an almost-Wikipedia-like model to get contributors who often link back to them.

I try hard in my writing, my presentations and my other professional contributions to this industry to be warm, generous and understanding. But black hats telling the world that they turned their back on white hat because white hat SEO is impossible is a load of crap, and I'm not feeling very empathetic toward that viewpoint.

Yes, white hat SEO, particularly in boring industries for non-established sites, is a tremendous challenge. It requires immense creativity, huge quantities of elbow grease, and a lot of patience. Black hat SEO sometimes requires creativity. More often, though, it's finding the tactic Google and Bing haven't caught up to, and applying it over and over—until it burns down your site and you have to find another. Black hat is fundamentally interesting, and often amazingly entertaining, in the same way movies and TV shows featuring clever bank robbers are. But a statement like this has no legs to stand on:

The longer I practiced and studied greyhat, the more annoyed I got with the poor advice and absolute falsehoods I saw being doled out by so called SEO experts to newbies who had no way of knowing that the advice they were soaking up was going to keep them at the back of the search engine results pages (SERPs) for the foreseeable future. Whitehat isn't just a bit slower. It's wishful thinking. It's irresponsible.

Thankfully, it's easy to refute Kris' points with hard, substantive examples (something his post doesn't do at all).

Job searches are among the most challenging, competitive keyword phrases to rank well for in the SERPs. Back in 2008, when we still had a consulting practice, we worked with the crew at Simply Hired (www.simplyhired.com) to set up a long-term strategy for beating the odds. It involved creating a syndication strategy with smart linking and anchor text, embeddable widgets, and a search-friendly, crawlable site with a data-rich blog. It included a massive online brand-building campaign, too. After six months, Simply Hired's rankings and traffic had improved, but they certainly weren't #1 across the board for job searches. However, I'm incredibly proud of their progress since then. I stay in touch with their team and help out informally when/where I can do so. They're on Page 1 for “job search” and rank for hundreds of thousands of job title + geo combination searches. Thanks to SEO (and dozens of other successful marketing and sales programs), they're poised to become industry leaders in a massive market.

These strategies that worked for Simply Hired (and other former Moz clients like Yelp, Etsy and Zillow) aren't some dark secret, either. I wrote a lengthy blog post explaining the process in depth in a Moz post (www.moz.com/blog/ranking-for-keyword-cityname-in-multiple-geographies). I'm not alone, either. Blogs produced by SearchEngineLand, SEOBook, Distilled, and many others give tremendously valuable advice day after day.

I think Kris owes us some examples of “poor advice and absolute falsehoods” being “doled out by so called SEO experts.” I'll agree that there's some bad advice floating around the SEO world, and I'll even admit to giving some myself. Regardless, that's a bold statement for Kris to make without any evidence.

Unfortunately, this next statement can't be written off so easily:

If you are charging your clients for service and not being competitive then you are ripping off your clients. It's as simple as that. I know you white hats are squirming in your seats right now shaking your little fists and saying, “It's not sustainable. Our strategy is based around long term results!” No, it's not. Your strategy is based around wishful thinking and hoping that someday Google will do your job for you so you don't have to. Until Google starts enforcing the rules, there aren't any. And as long as that is true anyone who is not waiting around for them to be enforced is going to rank. Anyone who does wait around won't. You have an obligation to your clients to do everything in your power to rank their sites using the most effective methods currently available to you.

He's dead wrong on the false choice between either being black hat or “not using the most effective methods.” A tax advisor that recommends quasi-legal, high-risk shelters might be using “the most effective methods” to protect wealth, but that doesn't make his more responsible peers obligation-dodging sissies. Search marketers have an obligation, in my opinion, to know and understand the full spectrum of tactics from white hat to black hat. We also carry the same responsibility that any other professional with specialized knowledge does: to recommend the right strategy for the situation.

Unless your manager/company/client is wholly comfortable with the high-risk variable that comes with black hat SEO, you'd better stay clear. I'm also of the mind that there's almost nothing black hat can accomplish that white hat can't do better while building far more value in the long run. Unless it's “I want to rank in the top five for ‘buy viagra' in the next 7 days,” you'd better explain that you're recommending black hat primarily because you're not smart, talented and creative enough to find a white hat strategy to do it.

Kris makes a fair point with regards to Google, though (and Bing as well). The engines are not doing enough to stop spam and manipulation from black hat tactics (see www.moz.com/blog/im-getting-more-worried-about-the-effectiveness-of-webspam). And, for as long as they fail on this front, there will be those seduced by Kris' viewpoint (Kris himself used to be quite white hat). To be fair, they've done a good job on several fronts recently—pushing down low-quality content farms in the Panda/Farmer update, making original content rank better, and putting more high quality brands in the SERPs (even if they're not doing perfect SEO).

The biggest problems (IMO) that we are seeing today are manipulative, black hat links obtained through paid sources; automated link drops, reciprocal spam, link rings and article spinning. (Article spinning is probably my least favorite tactic on the rise.) There aren't a lot of truly new types of black hat link manipulation techniques, but the old ones are, tragically, working again in a lot of niches. I hope that's next on Google's and Bing's radar. If it is, a lot of black hats are going to have some painful times. Even if it's rough, I think that's the only way to solve the problems web spam creates. One of my favorite parts of being a white hat is cheering for the search quality teams rather than against them, and getting that little bump in traffic every time they improve the quality of their algorithms.

Black Hat ≠ SEO

The last point of Kris' I'll tackle revolves around the jobs an SEO performs:

If your main offering is quality content—YOU ARE NOT AN SEO, you are a writer. If you are billing your client SEO prices for writing services you are ripping them off. If you didn't go to college for or otherwise study writing and literature and you are offering writing services to your client rather than advising them to hire someone who actually specializes and is trained in writing, you are ripping them off.

With the exception of very large sites, most onsite optimization opportunities can be identified and charted in an audit in a matter of a few days. Implementation in most cases won't take very long either and doesn't even really need to be conducted by an SEO if the audit is written up properly. What does that leave: content strategy and off-site SEO. The content strategy is just that … a STRATEGY, which can be handed off to a competent writer. If you are still charging your client after this point and you aren't competing with all the tools available and you aren't advising them of someone else who could or would, then you are doing your client a disservice.