21,99 €
Although Islamic philosophy represents one of the leading philosophical traditions in the world, it has only recently begun to receive the attention it deserves in the non-Islamic world. This important text provides a concise and accessible introduction to the major movements, thinkers and concepts within that tradition, from the foundation of Islam to the present day.
Ever since the growth of Islam as a religious and political movement, Muslim thinkers have sought to understand the theoretical aspects of their faith by using philosophical concepts. Leaman outlines this history and demonstrates that, although the development of Islamic philosophy is closely linked with Islam itself, its form is not essentially connected to any particular religion, and its leading ideas and arguments are of general philosophical significance. The author illustrates the importance of Islamic thought within philosophy through the use of many modern examples. He describes and contrasts the three main movements in Islamic philosophy ? Peripatetic, Sufi and Illuminationist ? and examines the Persian as well as the Arabic traditions. Wide coverage is given to key aspects of Islamic philosophy, including epistemology, ontology, politics, ethics and philosophy of language, providing readers with a balanced view of the discipline. The second edition has been thoroughly revised and updated throughout, including the addition of two new chapters on recent debates surrounding Islam's need for an enlightenment, and on the future of Islamic philosophy.
The new edition of Islamic Philosophy will continue to be essential reading for students and scholars of the subject, as well as anyone wanting to learn more about one of the most significant and influential philosophical traditions in the world today.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 538
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013
Islamic Philosophy
Islamic Philosophy An Introduction
Oliver Leaman
Polity
Copyright © Oliver Leaman 2009
The right of Oliver Leaman to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
First published in 2009 by Polity Press
Polity Press
65 Bridge Street
Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK
Polity Press
350 Main Street
Malden, MA 02148, USA
All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-5907-7
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Typeset in 10.5 on 12 pt Sabon
by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire
Printed and bound by MPG Books Group, UK
The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.
Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publishers will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
For further information on Polity, visit our website: www.politybooks.com
Contents
Preface to the Second Edition
Author’s Note and Abbreviations
Glossary
1
A SHORT HISTORY OF ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY
The growth of Islam
Neoplatonism
Major thinkers
2
MAIN CONTROVERSIES
What is Islamic philosophy?
Early reactions to Greek philosophy in Islamic culture: the Great Debate
Al-Ghazali and philosophy: the question of creation
The nature of time
Mulla Sadra on change
Iqbal on time
Ibn Rushd on time
What can God do?
Miracles and meaning
The afterlife
What can God know?
Philosophical accounts of religious concepts
How free is God?
Essence, existence and miracles
The meaning of words
Meaning and unity
bi-la kayfa
Ibn Taymiyya on talking about God
3
KNOWLEDGE
The notion of Islamic science
Science and rationality
The nature of knowledge
What is knowledge for?
Imagination
Ibn Sina on knowledge and the ‘oriental’ philosophy
Sufism, knowledge and imagination
Knowledge by presence
4
MYSTICISM
Mysticism as a system
Being
Mysticism as a science
The perfect man
The deepening of prayer
Criticisms of Sufism
5
ONTOLOGY
Being and existence in Islamic philosophy
Ibn Rushd vs Ibn Sina on existence
Mulla Sadra vs al-Suhrawardi on existence
The equivocality of being
Mulla Sadra and mysticism
The imaginal realm
Different routes to one truth and the role of imagination
Allegory and meaning: the imaginal realm again
Prophecy and its psychological basis
Is being really the first question in metaphysics?
6
ETHICS
Theological background: Mu‘tazilites vs Ash‘arites
Ethics and divine power
Al-Ghazali’s attack on objectivism in ethics
Trusting authority
The need for guidance
7
POLITICS
Plato vs Aristotle
The diversity of human beings
Islamic accounts of history
The notion of the ‘medieval’
Liberalism vs Islam
The case of
jihad
Modern political consequences
8
THE QUESTION OF TRANSMISSION
Philosophy and religion
The notion of cultural contact
The Andalusi connection
Getting back to basics
Falsafa
and
hikma
: philosophy and wisdom
The concept of religious reason
The concept of inclusive reason
Robinson Crusoe
and
Hayy ibn Yaqzan
9
LANGUAGE
The case of Ibn Rushd
Ibn Rushd on meaning
Ibn Rushd and elitism
The Enlightenment Project
Ibn Rushd as a critic of mysticism
The implications for language
10
ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY TODAY
The West as decadent
Confronting tradition
Islamic exceptionalism
Did al-Ghazali destroy Islamic philosophy?
11
DOES ISLAM NEED AN ENLIGHTENMENT?
Jewish and Muslim reactions to modernity
Moses Mendelssohn and ‘Muhammad Abduh
Islamic exceptionalism again
The Enlightenment and theology
Christianity as the symbol of modernity
The need for an Enlightenment
The lack of radicalism in Islamic Qur’an commentary 207
References and Bibliography
Guide to Further Reading
Index
Preface to the Second Edition
This is not the first introductory text which I have written on Islamic philosophy, which raises the obvious question of why there should be a need for another one, and by the same author. Whether, ultimately, this book has been worth the effort of writing and reading is of course something that the reader will have to decide; but from my point of view it has been worthwhile, because I have changed my ideas about some of the ways in which I formerly saw the main issues. In the past I had what seems to me now to be a rather narrow view of the discipline. I prioritized Islamic philosophy in the Peripatetic or Greek tradition, Islamic philosophy based on logic and the sort of analysis with which most philosophers in the Anglo-American world feel at home. I still think that this is the most important strain of Islamic philosophy; but I now think that the other two main schools – the mystical, or Sufi, school and the illuminationist, or ishraqi, school – produce interesting and important arguments that have to be assessed as parts of the whole enterprise. Ignoring these traditions does an injustice to the breadth of the enterprise of Islamic philosophy. In any case, very few of those writing within the Peripatetic tradition of falsafa restricted themselves to this type of writing; they merely saw it as playing a role in the rational understanding of our place in a world created by God – not the only role, but just one role among many others. Moreover, these other roles, especially those of mysticism or illuminationist thought, are also important ways in which we can know who we are and how far we can understand what is above us. I think it is true of any general philosophical movement that we go awry if we concentrate merely on one aspect of it. In this book I present a more rounded and comprehensive guide to the topic than I could have in the past.
Another difference from some of my earlier work is that I now think that it is not so obvious who the heroes and the villains are or were. It is not uncommon to point to ‘conservatives’ and ‘progressives’ in the Islamic world, just as today we can divide Muslims into ‘traditionalists’ and ‘modernists’. Although in the past I always thought that the quality of the arguments of the opponents of philosophy was high, I thought that the arguments of the defenders of philosophy were higher. Now I am not so sure. It seems to me that often those Muslim thinkers who seek to emphasize their faith at the expense of what they see as philosophy produce better philosophical arguments than do the defenders of philosophy. I think this brings out nicely the ways in which Islamic philosophy is really part and parcel of the general working-out of the implications of Islam itself, as a consequence of which any attempt at artificially segregating philosophy from faith is too one-dimensional to do justice to Islamic philosophy. On the other hand, I have written this book on the assumption that one does not need to be committed to any particular religion, or indeed any religion at all, to understand Islamic philosophy. Nor does one have to know much about Islam itself. I have kept the technical vocabulary to a minimum, and have tried to explain whatever cultural and religious details are important for an understanding of Islamic philosophy. I have also on occasion used Islamic philosophy to pursue controversies in the modern Islamic world, to bring to the attention of the reader the contemporary relevance and interest of the ideas and arguments discussed within Islamic philosophy. Because I presuppose no knowledge of either Islam or philosophy, I start with a brief history of Islamic philosophy that also introduces the reader to some of the basic concepts of Islam, and throughout the text ideas in Islam and philosophy are discussed together. There are omissions from the book that should be found in a more comprehensive account of the topic, of course; logic in particular is a notable absentee, but I did not feel that this was a particularly appropriate topic for the general reader. Logic aside, I hope I have included most of the main categories of Islamic philosophy, and have given sufficient bibliographical details for those interested in pursuing the subject further.
Despite what I hope is a more inclusive account of Islamic philosophy than hitherto, there is no doubt about whom I regard as the major thinker in the subject, and that is Ibn Rushd (Averroes). I make no excuse for my choice, and hope that in this eight-hundredth anniversary of his death the exceptional interest of his arguments will impress the reader. The difficult life of Ibn Rushd, who brought forth great theoretical works while suffering intermittent political disruption, reminds those of us who work in more comfortable conditions of the essentially radical nature of the philosophical enterprise when it confronts, or even tries to coexist with, tradition.
I have added a couple of new chapters and generally updated what remains, but the structure of the book is similar to the first edition, in that this is not primarily a historical introduction to the topic but is rather based on topics and issues, very much how I see Islamic philosophy as needing to be done. Not of course that there is anything wrong with history, but it can be very limiting in its attitude to its subject matter, when that subject matter consists of arguments and debates. One of the new chapters looks at some modern Islamic philosophers, and here I have only been able to discuss a few of the relevant thinkers. The other considers the frequent assertion that Islam needs an enlightenment, and missed out on it, since this is primarily a philosophical claim, although it is often given a political and theological direction.
Many of the arguments in this book were originally presented to various audiences in different countries, and I must thank all those who made comments on such occasions, who are too many to enumerate, and especially the students with whom I have been privileged to work. No one is to be held responsible for my views here, of course, except their author.
Oliver Leaman
Lexington, 2009
Author’s Note and Abbreviations
Dates are generally given in this form: AH / CE. AH refers to the hijra, when in 622 CE the Prophet Muhammad moved to Medina and established a political community. This marks the first Muslim year in the lunar calendar.
Transliteration from Arabic and Persian is partial, omitting diacritics and macrons, but otherwise using ordinary conventions.
Quotations from the Qur’an are generally from the Arberry version, with occasional alterations, and carry the normal form of references to the original text.
Readers should note that the dates provided for books relate to the date of publication, and not of course to when they were written.
The following abbreviation has been used:
Glossary
For more detail on theological terms, see Leaman, O. (ed.), The Qur’an: An Encyclopedia, London: Routledge, and on philosophical terms, see Groff, P., in Islamic Philosophy A–Z, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
ahadith
Traditions, plural of hadith
‘alam al-ghayb
hidden world
‘alam al-khayal
world of imagination
‘alam al-mithal
world of images
‘alam al-shahada
visible world
anniya
being
‘aql al-awwal
first intellect
‘aql al-fa‘‘al
active intellect
asalat al-wujud
priority of being
asbab al-nuzul
occasions of revelation
ayat
signs, verses of the Qur’an
barzakh
isthmus, passage between this world and the next
bi-la kayfa
without asking how
dar al-ahd
land of truce
dar al-aman
land of safety
dar al-harb
land of war
dar al-islam
land of Islam, i.e., peace
dar al-sulh
land of peace
dhat
essence
dhawq
taste
dhikr
remembrance
dhimmi
protected subject, i.e., non-Muslim
falasifa, falsafa, faylasuf
philosophers, philosophy, philosopher
fana’
annihilation
faqih
lawyer
fasad
corruption
fayd
emanation
fiqh
jurisprudence
fitra
innate nature; destiny
hadith
Tradition, report of something said by the Prophet or his Companions truth
al-haraka al-jawhariya
substantial motion
harakat al-tanwir
enlightenment movement
haskala
enlightenment
hikma
wisdom, philosophy
hikma mashraqiya
Eastern wisdom
huwiyya
being
ihya’
revival
i‘jaz al-qur’an
miracle of the Qur’an
ijma‘
consensus
‘ilm
knowledge
‘ilm al-tasawwuf
mystical knowledge, science of mysticism
inhitat
decadence
insan al-kamil
perfect man, i.e., Muhammad
ishraqi
Illuminative (philosophy)
isnad
chain (of transmitters of ahadith)
isti’ghrab
occidentalism
jahada
struggle
jihad
a struggle, war
jihad al-nafs
struggle with the soul
jism al-khayali
imaginal bodies
kalam
theology
kana
being
kashf
unveiling, i.e., to open the heart to mystical illumination
khilafa
caliphate
malaki
knowledge/esoteric knowledge
ma‘arifa
angelic
mashsha’i
Peripatetic (philosophy)
maskilim
enlightened, i.e., modern scholars
mawjud
existence
mutakallimun
theologians
nahda
(Arab) renaissance
nawabit
weeds
qalb
heart
qudsi
sacred
salaf, salafi
ancestors, original, i.e., orthodox
shari‘a
religious law
shaykh
leader
shaykh al-ra’is
the first master
shi‘at ‘Ali
the party of Ali
shirk
idolatry
shura
consultation
al-sirat al-mustaqim
the straight path
sunna
tradition
surah
chapter of the Qur’an
tajdid
renewal
ta‘lim
education
taqlid
imitation
tasawwur
conception
tasdiq
assent, judgement
tashkik
equivocation
tashkik al-wujud
equivocality of being
tawhid
unity
ta’wil
interpretation
umma
community
‘ulama
scholars
usul
principles
velayet-i faqih
rule by the clergy
wahdat al-shuhud
unity of consciousness
wahdat al-wujud
unity of being
wali
friend
1
A Short History of Islamic Philosophy
Adherents of religion often start off by thinking that the religion provides everything they need in order to understand reality. Not practical or scientific knowledge, perhaps, but certainly knowledge of how to live and what the real nature of the world is (Islam does also provide scientific information in the view of some believers, see Shamsher Ali 2006). It is interesting to speculate about why a religious movement should feel the need to take on systems of theoretical thought which come from outside that movement. After all, many such movements possess a considerable theoretical machinery of their own. Believers might well feel that there is enough within the system of thought of Islam itself to encompass any conceptual problems or issues which could arise. Within the system of Islam itself there exists, first and foremost, the Qur’an, with its detailed analysis of the nature of reality and its advice to readers. The Qur’an stresses that it is written in a simple Arabic and the implication is that it is then not difficult to understand (19: 97; 54: 17). Then there exist for many Muslims the practices (sunna) of the Prophet and his Companions, and his community (), while for others there is the continuing guidance of a spiritual leader (imam). The former acquire their name of Sunni Muslims from the fact that they are committed to using the reports of the practices of the Prophet and his close Companions as a source of information about how to behave. The latter are the Shi‘ites, or Shi‘i, who derive their name from the term (the party of‘Ali), because they pay particular attention to the Prophet’s son-in-law,‘Ali, and his successors as sources of spiritual knowledge (Muhajirani 1996; Lalani 2006). As sources of authority there are also the traditions (, sing. ) that reproduce important sayings of the Prophet and his Companions, and a methodology for distinguishing between reliable and suspect traditions. On this basis, a superstructure of theology () was constructed, which investigates the theoretical problems in understanding the combination of all the former techniques, and jurisprudence (), which specifies what actions are acceptable or otherwise. Finally, there is the grammar of the Arabic language, the language in which the Qur’an itself was transmitted, the speech of God himself, so crucially important for understanding the meaning of the message in the text. It is hardly surprising that many Muslims felt, and continue to feel, that there is more than enough within Islam and its systems of knowledge, often called the Islamic sciences, to deal with any problem which might arise, and hence that there is no need for any additional source of theoretical information to be employed. This is a common reaction of adherents to many religions which have a sophisticated system of explanation, who, as a result, resent the idea of going outside the religion in order to resolve theoretical and even practical problems (Leaman 1988b, 2000c).
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
