39,99 €
Winner: 2012 The American Publishers Award for Professional and Scholarly Excellence in Theology and Religious Studies, PROSE Award. In this thought-provoking new work, the world renowned theologian Gary Dorrien reveals how Kantian and post-Kantian idealism were instrumental in the foundation and development of modern Christian theology. * Presents a radical rethinking of the roots of modern theology * Reveals how Kantian and post-Kantian idealism were instrumental in the foundation and development of modern Christian theology * Shows how it took Kant's writings on ethics and religion to launch a fully modern departure in religious thought * Dissects Kant's three critiques of reason and his moral conception of religion * Analyzes alternative arguments offered by Schleiermacher, Schelling, Hegel, and others - moving historically and chronologically through key figures in European philosophy and theology * Presents notoriously difficult and intellectual arguments in a lucid and accessible manner
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1682
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2012
Contents
Cover
Books by Gary Dorrien
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Preface and Acknowledgments
Chapter 1: Introduction: Kantian Concepts, Liberal Theology, and Post-Kantian Idealism
Imagining Modern Theology
Kantian Liberalism and Mediating Theology
Kantian and Hegelian Ordering
Ideal and Normative, Subjective and Objective
Chapter 2: Subjectivity in Question: Immanuel Kant, Johann G. Fichte, and Critical Idealism
Refashioning Enlightenment Metaphysics: Immanuel Kant
Pure Reason and the Bounds of Sense
Moral Religion Within the Bounds of Reason
The Kantian Legacy
Kant, Jacobi, Fichte, and Post-Kantianism
Chapter 3: Making Sense of Religion: Friedrich Schleiermacher, John Locke, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Liberal Theology
Sense for the Infinite: Friedrich Schleiermacher
Spiritual True Religion
Christian Theology of Religious Feeling
John Locke, British Empiricism, and the Anglican Threefold Cord
Samuel Taylor Coleridge and English Romanticism
Chapter 4: Dialectics of Spirit: F. W. J. Schelling, G. W. F. Hegel, and Absolute Idealism
Imagining Hegelian Idealism: Schelling, Hölderlin, and Hegel
Concept and Intuition: Hegel, Schelling, Kant, and Jena
Phenomenology of Spirit: Conception, Consciousness, Self-Consciousness
Spirit, Absolute Religion, Absolute Knowing
The Struggle for Recognition
Logic, Encyclopedia, Right
Hegelian Philosophy of Religion
Hegelianism
Chapter 5: Hegelian Spirit in Question: David Friedrich Strauss, Søren Kierkegaard, and Mediating Theology
Mediating Schleiermacher's Legacy
David Friedrich Strauss and Left-Hegelianism
History, Myth, and Hermeneutics
Becoming a Self: Sren Kierkegaard
The End as the Middle: The Fragments and the Postscript
Provoking Ridicule
Training in Christianity, Attack Upon Christendom
Chapter 6: Neo-Kantian Historicism: Albrecht Ritschl, Adolf von Harnack, Wilhelm Herrmann, Ernst Troeltsch, and the Ritschlian School
Ritschlian Theology
Adolf von Harnack and the Spirit of Liberal Protestant Theology
Wilhelm Herrmann, Ernst Troeltsch, and the Scope of Historical Criticism
Another Kind of Ritschlianism
Revelation as Freedom from History
Ernst Troeltsch: The Relativity of Christianity and the History of Religion
Political Ethics and Social Christianity
Chapter 7: Idealistic Ordering: Lux Mundi, Andrew Seth Pringle-Pattison, Hastings Rashdall, Alfred E. Garvie, Alfred North Whitehead, William Temple, and British Idealism
Lux Mundi and Liberal Catholicism
Getting Hegel and Personality Right: Andrew Seth Pringle-Pattison
Idealistic Elitism: Hastings Rashdall
Liberal Evangelicalism: Alfred E. Garvey
Idealistic Ordering: William Temple
Organic Realism as Theology: Temple and Alfred North Whitehead
Chapter 8: The Barthian Revolt: Karl Barth, Paul Tillich, and the Legacy of Liberal Theology
Fire Alarm of a Coming New World
Dialectic in the Service of Dogmatics
Refashioning German Idealism: Paul Tillich
Interrogating German Liberal Theology and Idealism
Dialectics of the Open Word
Chapter 9: Idealistic Ironies: From Kant and Hegel to Tillich and Barth
Idealism as White Supremacist Ordering
Deflating Idealism: G. E. Moore and the Analytic Turn
Idealism Fading and Embattled
Tillich and the Future of Idealism
The Neo-Kantian/Postmodern Barth: Realism, Idealism, and Dialecticism
Index
Books by Gary Dorrien
Logic and Consciousness
The Democratic Socialist Vision,
Reconstructing the Common Good
The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture, and the War of Ideology
Soul in Society: The Making and Renewal of Social Christianity
The Word as True Myth: Interpreting Modern Theology
The Remaking of Evangelical Theology
The Barthian Revolt in Modern Theology
The Making of American Liberal Theology: Imagining Progressive Religion, 1805–1900
The Making of American Liberal Theology: Idealism, Realism and Modernity, 1900–1950
Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana
The Making of American Liberal Theology: Crisis, Irony and Postmodernity, 1950–2005
Social Ethics in the Making: Interpreting an American Tradition
Economy, Difference, Empire: Social Ethics for Social Justice
Obama in Question: A Progressive Critique and Defense
Kantian Reason and Hegelian Spirit: The Idealistic Logic of Modern Theology
This edition first published 2012 © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Wiley-Blackwell is an imprint of John Wiley & Sons, formed by the merger of Wiley's global Scientific, Technical and Medical business with Blackwell Publishing.
Registered Office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services, and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.
The right of Gary Dorrien to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Dorrien, Gary J. Kantian reason and Hegelian spirit : the idealistic logic of modern theology / Gary Dorrien.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-470-67331-7 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. Philosophical theology. 2. Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804–Influence. 3. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831–Influence. I. Title. BT40.D67 2012
230.09′034–dc23
2011045996
For Cindy, Nelleke, Mike, Xan, Kevin, and Hannah, with affection andtreasured memories.
Preface and Acknowledgments
Until now, I lacked an answer for one of the nicest questions: “Which book of yours means the most to you?” Usually I stammered the truth – “I have no idea.” Otherwise I settled for an evasion – “The next one.” At last I have a real answer, because this book makes an argument about the thinkers and ideas that underlie modern religious thought as a whole.
My work ranges across social ethics and politics, on the one hand, and modern religious philosophy and theology, on the other. I am equally committed to these subject areas, having never tried to settle on one of them or even ranked one higher than the other. There is a disciplinary link between the fields of ethics and theology – theological ethics – but that is not where most of my work takes place. On the ethical side, I work mostly at the intersections of social ethics, social theory, and politics, and on the theological side, I work mostly in the branch of historical theology that deals with modern religious and philosophical thought.
I started this book with the idea of something analogous to my three volumes on The Making of American Liberal Theology, but soon I realized that I had too much at stake in this project to give it the encyclopedic treatment. Instead of tracking, in a multi-volume format, the history and variations of modern German and British theology, I went straight for an argument about the importance of Kantian and post-Kantian idealism in the founding of modern theology.
This decision reflects something about how I learned modern religious and philosophical thought, something about how I teach it, and something about my constructive perspective. In college, I cut my teeth intellectually on G. W. F. Hegel and Paul Tillich. Long before I had an inkling of a future in the academy or anything pertaining to religion, I was drawn to Hegel's theory of self-knowing Spirit arising through the realization of consciousness, an idea that, importantly to me, held a similar lure for Martin Luther King, Jr. But one day I realized that it was pointless to grapple any further with modern philosophers and theologians until I took on Immanuel Kant's critiques of reason. Kant is the single unavoidable thinker in modern philosophy, and one of the founders of modern religious thought along with Hegel and Friedrich Schleiermacher. Today, in the classroom, I find it impossible to teach almost any subject in religious thought or social ethics without spending at least two weeks on what the subject in question owes to Kant and Hegel. This interpretive and pedagogical standpoint underlies the normative argument that I make in this book – that progressive theology at its best is always buoyed with idealistic conviction and armed with a realistic brake on it.
Karl Barth enjoyed regaling his students with the story of how Hegel and Schleiermacher came up at the same time, Hegel eclipsed Schleiermacher when they lived, and Schleiermacher overtook Hegel, at least in theology, after they were gone. Usually Barth cautioned his students about their acquired liberalism, telling them that they lived in Schleiermacher's age and under his influence, whether or not they realized it. Sometimes he urged them to imagine what theology might have been like had Schleiermacher never existed. But I will argue that even Barthian theology is unimaginable without Kant, Hegel, and Schleiermacher.
This book is like my previous one for Wiley-Blackwell, Social Ethics in the Making, in that I held my students at Union Theological Seminary and Columbia University chiefly in mind as I wrote it, especially my doctoral students. For me, it is always a high priority to help students grasp the story of the field they are entering. My understanding of it has been greatly enriched by working with three recently graduated doctoral students (Ian Doescher, Eboni Marshall Turman, and Christine Pae), and a special group of graduate students with whom I have worked closely (Nixon Cleophat, Preston Davis, Peter Herman, Dwayne Meadows, and Elijah Prewitt-Davis), and my current group of doctoral students: Lisa Anderson, Nkosi Anderson, Malinda Berry, Chloe Breyer, Babydoll Kennedy, Jeremy Kirk, David Orr, Tracy Riggle, Dan Rohrer, Gabriel Salguero, Charlene Sinclair, Joe Strife, Rima Vesely-Flad, Colleen Wessel-McCoy, Demian Wheeler, and Todd Willison. Blessings and thanks to all.
All my colleagues at Union and Columbia are superb colleagues and some are special friends; in the latter category I am especially grateful to James Cone, Roger Haight, Esther Hamori, Kelby Harrison, Obery M. Hendricks, Jr., Brigitte Kahl, Paul Knitter, Serene Jones, Barbara Lundblad, Daisy Machado, John McGuckin, Christopher Morse, Aliou Niang, Su Yon Pak, Jan Rehmann, Mark C. Taylor, John Thatamanil, and Janet Walton. Many thanks to my editors at Blackwell for their skillful work, especially project manager and copy-editor Graeme Leonard and publisher Rebecca Harkin. And thanks to Diana Witt for another superb index.
Chapter 1
Introduction
Kantian Concepts, Liberal Theology, and Post-Kantian Idealism
This is a book about the role of Kantian and post-Kantian idealism in founding modern theology. More specifically, it is a book about the impact of Kantian and post-Kantian idealism in creating what came to be called “liberal” theology in Germany and “modernist” theology in Great Britain. My descriptive argument is implied in this description, which folds together with my normative argument: Modern religious thought originated with idealistic convictions about the spiritual ground and unifying reality of freedom, and there is no vital progressive theology that does not speak with idealistic conviction, notwithstanding the ironies and problems of doing so.
Liberal theology was born in largely illiberal contexts in eighteenth-century Germany and England, a fact that helps to explain why much of it was far from liberal. Most of the great thinkers in this story were Germans, the key founding thinkers were Germans, and there was a vital intellectual movement of liberal theology in Germany for a century before a similar movement existed in Britain. Thus, the German story dominates this book. British theology comes into the picture mostly as it engages German idealism, as do the book's principal other non-German thinkers, Sren Kierkegaard and Karl Barth, although the British story begins with a figure that preceded Kant by a century, John Locke. For better and for worse, German thinkers dominated modern theology right up to the point that liberal theology in Germany crashed and burned, after which the field was still dominated by the intellectual legacies of Immanuel Kant, G. W. F. Hegel, Friedrich Schleiermacher, and the Ritschlian School.
The idea of a distinctly modern approach to Christian theology built upon early Enlightenment attempts in Britain and Germany to blend Enlightenment reason with a Christian worldview. I will argue, however, that early Enlightenment rationalism and empiricism did not privilege the questions of subjectivity, historical relativity, and freedom, and thus did not develop a liberal approach to theology. It took Kant's three critiques of reason and his writings on religion and ethics to launch a fully modern departure in religious thought, through which Kant became the quintessential modern philosopher and inspired rival streams of theology and idealism.
I will argue that Kant's influence in modern religious thought is unsurpassed by any thinker, that his use of metaphysical reason is usually misconstrued, that he was a subjective idealist who mediated between extreme subjective idealism and objective idealism, that his recognition of universal forms of experience paved the way to post-Kantian objective idealism, that his moral faith mattered more to him than anything except his idea of freedom to which it was linked, and that the key to his system – terrible ironies notwithstanding – was the emancipating and unifying reality of freedom. I will argue that Kant's transcendental idealism laid the groundwork for all post-Kantian versions and that the post-Kantian idealisms of Hegel, Schleiermacher, Friedrich W. J. Schelling, and, very differently, Kierkegaard, surpassed Kant in creatively construing religious experience and the divine. I will argue that the dominant forms of liberal theology flowed out of German idealism and tried to calibrate the right kind of idealism to distinct positions about the way that any religion is true. And I will argue that even the important critiques of religious idealism proffered by Kierkegaard, William James, G. E. Moore, Paul Tillich, and Karl Barth demonstrated its adaptability and continued importance.
Philosophers loom large in this story. Kant defined himself against René Descartes, the founder of modern philosophy, G. W. Leibniz and Christian Wolff, the leaders of the German Enlightenment, and John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume, the luminaries of British empiricism. By the late 1780s, everyone had to deal with Kant and the beginnings of post-Kantian idealism. Samuel Taylor Coleridge plays a major role in this book for doing so, as Coleridge brought post-Kantian idealism to England. Kierkegaard plays a similar role in the book's scheme by prefiguring the twentieth-century reaction against religious idealism from a standpoint that assumed it. Alfred North Whitehead plays a key role in this book's account of the beginning of process theology in England. None of these thinkers was a theologian.
One should not make too much of the lack of theologians. Schleiermacher and Barth, the major Protestant theologians of the modern era, are central figures in this book's narrative. The book also features theologians Albrecht Ritschl, Adolf von Harnack, Wilhelm Herrmann, Ernst Troeltsch, Hastings Rashdall, William Temple, and Paul Tillich. But it matters that non-theologians played such important roles in founding and shaping modern theology.
Until the eighteenth century, Christian theology operated exclusively within houses of biblical and ecclesiastical authority. External authorities established and compelled what had to be believed on specific points of doctrine if one was to claim the Christian name. In theory, the Anglican tradition cracked open the rule of external authority by making reason an authority second to scripture and (in Richard Hooker's formulation) ahead of church tradition. But Anglican theology up to and through the Enlightenment was cautious about what it meant to recognize the authority of reason. The English tradition, though producing a major forerunner of modern theology, John Locke, did not produce any important founders. An ethos of provincialism and the oppressive weight of the state church slowed the development of liberalizing trends in British theology. Plus, the greatest British philosopher, David Hume, was someone that religious thinkers had to get around, not someone who helped them get somewhere. The modern departure in religious thought had to wait for the later Enlightenment, biblical criticism, the liberalizing of German universities, Kant, an upsurge of Romantic and Absolute idealism, and Schleiermacher's determination to liberalize Christian theology within the context of the Christian church and tradition.
The founding and early development of liberal theology was sufficiently rich in Germany and Britain that this book restricts itself to accounting for it, always in a manner that focuses on the importance of German idealism. I do not pursue the founding of liberal religious thought in other national contexts, aside from occasional references that illuminate what happened in Germany and Britain. I do not take the story of liberal theology beyond the responses of Barth and Tillich to it; otherwise I would have another multi-volume project on my hands. For the same reason, plus two more, I do not describe the attempts to develop a Roman Catholic version of liberal theology that occurred during the historical frame of this account. Roman Catholic Modernism was mostly a French phenomenon, and the Vatican crushed it in the early twentieth century. The development of a Catholic tradition of liberal theology had to wait until Vatican Council II.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!