0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic Modification," Samuel Butler examines the intricate interplay between chance and design in the evolution of species. Written in Butler's characteristic satirical style, the book critiques the deterministic views of Darwinian evolution, positing that both luck and cunning play pivotal roles in the modification of organic life. The text carefully navigates the philosophical underpinnings of natural selection and blends literary wit with scientific inquiry, creating a thought-provoking narrative that challenges established notions within the Victorian scientific context. Samuel Butler, a 19th-century novelist, cultural critic, and philosopher, was deeply influenced by his own experiences and observations of the natural world. His critique of established institutions, including religion and science, emerged from his belief in the importance of individuality and creativity. Butler's exposure to both the literary circles of his time and the burgeoning debates in evolutionary biology shaped this work, reflecting his conviction that evolution is an amalgamation of unpredictable chance and deliberate adaptation, rather than mere survival of the fittest. This book is highly recommended for anyone interested in the intersections of literature, philosophy, and science. Butler's compelling arguments and engaging prose invite readers to reconsider the complexities of evolution while providing a fresh perspective that remains relevant in contemporary discussions of natural history and adaptation. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic Modification
Table of Contents
Introduction
Framed as a decisive contest between blind chance and purposeful resourcefulness, Samuel Butler’s Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic Modification asks whether the history of life is best understood as an accumulation of lucky accidents or as the outcome of living beings’ own adaptive ingenuity, a question he presses with the polemical energy of a Victorian controversialist, the satirical agility of a novelist-essayist, and a steady determination to reopen debates that late nineteenth-century scientific orthodoxy seemed eager to close, compelling readers to weigh how explanations of change become persuasive, authoritative, and, perhaps too quickly, canonical.
First published in 1887, in the thick of Victorian arguments over evolution, this work belongs to the tradition of argumentative nonfiction that probes scientific theory through historical evidence, philosophical analysis, and rhetorical critique rather than laboratory experiment. It is not a narrative with characters and plot, but an intellectual intervention situated within the era’s ferment of ideas surrounding heredity, adaptation, and the interpretation of nature. Butler writes as a lay critic deeply engaged with scientific literature, addressing an educated public and contributing to a broader cultural conversation about how new knowledge is made, defended, and transmitted.
The premise is disarmingly simple yet far-reaching: if organisms change over time, is their transformation better explained by random variation sifted by circumstances, or by the accumulated effects of their own habits and efforts? Butler examines published arguments, historical precedents, and the language of his opponents to test the plausibility of each account. The reading experience is bracing and argumentative, marked by a confident, sometimes sardonic voice, lucid exposition, and a taste for pointed analogy. Rather than building a new experimental program, he offers a sustained critique of prevailing assumptions and invites readers to scrutinize the logic that underpins them.
Key themes surface quickly: agency versus accident in natural history; the power of habit and memory as metaphors for inheritance; and the ethics of influence, credit, and priority in the making of scientific reputations. Butler is preoccupied with how explanations gain authority—through evidence, rhetoric, or social position—and with the risk that tidy narratives can eclipse live ambiguity. He positions competing evolutionary frameworks in dialogue, not simply to score points, but to demonstrate how framing steers conclusions. The book’s central tension endures: does life merely happen to adapt, or do living things participate, in some form, in shaping their futures?
Stylistically, the book blends essayistic clarity with a caustic wit that keeps the prose alert and adversarial without lapsing into obscurity. Butler reads other writers closely, tests definitions, and worries at inconsistencies, using examples from everyday reasoning to expose where concepts drift or harden into dogma. The mood alternates between earnest exposition and satirical pressure, a pattern that gives the argument both intellectual traction and dramatic verve. Readers will notice how often the debate hinges on language—what counts as chance, what counts as intention—and how much turns on whether metaphors illuminate mechanisms or merely repackage assumptions.
For contemporary readers, its relevance lies less in adjudicating the science than in watching a culture negotiate uncertainty, evidence, and authority. The book models how dissent can sharpen questions, how historical memory shapes theoretical commitments, and how intellectual frameworks invite or exclude certain kinds of explanation. It resonates with ongoing conversations about the roles of behavior, development, and environment in evolutionary change, without requiring agreement with Butler’s positions to find value in his scrutiny. Above all, it urges attentiveness to method: what we count, what we discount, and how the stories we tell about nature guide what we look for next.
Approached as both history of ideas and rhetorical performance, this work offers a challenging, invigorating encounter with evolutionary thought at a formative moment. Readers can expect careful summaries of opposing views, sharp-edged criticism, and an insistence on definitional clarity that keeps the argument anchored. It rewards patient engagement, whether one comes for its Victorian intellectual drama or for the perennial questions it raises about causation, agency, and explanation. Butler’s contention—posed as a choice between luck and cunning—functions as a lens, encouraging us to examine how we decide what counts as an adequate cause in the living world and why that decision matters.
Synopsis
In Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic Modification (1887), Samuel Butler examines whether organic change chiefly proceeds by chance variations sifted by natural selection ("luck") or by intention-like, habit-driven processes within organisms ("cunning"). He frames the inquiry historically and conceptually, setting out to reassess prevailing evolutionary doctrines. The book blends argument, quotation, and example to track how living beings adapt and diversify. It proposes that purposive behavior, memory, and use are central to modification, while environmental filtering plays a secondary role. Butler positions the question as decisive for understanding heredity, instinct, and the continuity of mental and bodily life.
Butler begins by surveying predecessors to Darwin, especially Buffon, Erasmus Darwin, and Lamarck. He summarizes their accounts of use and disuse, habit, and the inheritance of acquired characteristics, presenting them as earlier, coherent explanations of adaptive change. He contends that the modern theory of natural selection repackages portions of these ideas while downplaying their purposive elements. Through extensive citation, he reconstructs a lineage of thought that treats organisms as agents whose repeated actions leave transmissible traces. This groundwork introduces the book’s central contrast: a history of evolution centered on directed effort versus one centered on accidental variations and the external sieve of selection.
Turning to contemporary evolutionary theory, Butler analyzes the language of natural selection and variation. He argues that selection, conceived as a process of elimination, cannot originate adaptive novelties and therefore requires a prior source of direction. He scrutinizes terms such as "chance," "spontaneous variation," and "sports," claiming they obscure causal gaps. He also compares statements across editions and authors to show shifts in emphasis between internal and external causes. The narrative presents natural selection as a real but subordinate principle that preserves outcomes, whereas primary causation—if organisms are purposive—must lie in their organized responses, habits, and accumulated adjustments.
Butler then advances his alternative: heredity as a form of "unconscious memory." He holds that each organism embodies recollections of ancestral acts, consolidated through repetition and transmitted across generations. Instincts are treated as inherited memories, guiding behavior without explicit awareness. Development and growth are described as the re-expression of remembered sequences, enabling coordinated structure and function. This framework, he suggests, provides an internal source of direction for variation. By assimilating the phenomena of habit formation in individual life to the mechanisms of descent, Butler proposes a single, continuous process linking ontogeny, instinct, and evolutionary modification through memory-like persistence.
Examples and analogies ground this view. Butler ranges across plant and animal behaviors, noting cases that resemble ingenuity—flowers that secure pollination, animals that learn and refine actions, and bodily parts that strengthen with practice. He compares such patterns to human skill acquisition, where repetition engrains performance that later feels automatic. Over time, he suggests, repeated organismal efforts imprint structure and response, so that what began as deliberate or laborious may become inherited facility. The examples are presented to illustrate how "cunning"—the directed use of parts and the economy of effort—could, by accumulation, shape organs, instincts, and life histories more directly than chance variation.
From these cases Butler develops his treatment of use and disuse. He maintains that sustained use fosters development and specialization, while disuse leads to reduction, and that both tendencies are heritable. Variation is depicted not as abrupt and groundless but as biased by the acquired habits of ancestors. Domestic breeding is discussed to contrast selection’s preservative role with the creative role of use. He emphasizes continuity between individual adaptation and species-level change, arguing that gradual, experience-based modifications can become stable traits. The upshot is a directional account: organisms orient themselves by need and effort, and evolution follows the lines traced by those orientations.
The book also revisits teleology. Butler distinguishes between external design imposed from without and internal purposiveness expressed from within living systems. He draws on natural-theological writers, including Paley, for their close attention to function, while reinterpreting design language in organismic terms. Mechanical analogies are retained but recast: an organism is likened to a self-adjusting machine whose structure records past use and guides future action. This stance aims to reconcile mechanism and purpose by locating design-like efficacy in the continuity of memory and habit, rather than in accidental aggregation or in a separate designer acting apart from the life of the organism.
Addressing contemporary interlocutors, Butler comments on Wallace, Darwin, and other evolutionists, examining how their formulations handle instinct, variation, and heredity. He highlights textual changes, questions attribution, and urges clearer acknowledgement of earlier sources. He also notes emerging views on germ–soma relations and challenges attempts to sever inheritance from experience. Throughout, he stresses methodological clarity: naming causes precisely, distinguishing preservation from origination, and testing explanations against developmental and behavioral regularities. The book’s argumentative course is cumulative, pressing the claim that a coherent vocabulary of habit, memory, and use better integrates evidence from growth, instinct, and adaptation than a reliance on chance-centered terms.
The work concludes by restating its preference for "cunning" over "luck" as the main means of organic modification. Butler holds that organisms, through sustained, purposive interaction with their environments, generate the lines along which selection subsequently acts. He calls for revising evolutionary theory to foreground internal, memory-based causation, treating natural selection as subsidiary. He also urges fairness in historical credit and precision in terminology. The overarching message is that life’s adaptations reflect continuity between mind-like processes and bodily change: what is practiced becomes habitual, what is habitual becomes inherited, and the long accumulation of such directed habits constitutes the primary engine of evolution.
Historical Context
Samuel Butler’s Luck, or Cunning, as the Main Means of Organic Modification appeared in London in 1887, late in the Victorian era, when industrial prosperity, urban growth, and the professionalization of science shaped public debate. Butler wrote from Clifford’s Inn, off Fleet Street, within walking distance of the periodical press that mediated scientific controversies. The work is set within the intellectual world of post-Darwin Britain, after Charles Darwin’s death in 1882 and amid the consolidation of scientific naturalism in London’s societies and museums. It engages a readership formed by expanding schools, lecture halls, and reading rooms, addressing questions of evolution, heredity, and purpose against a backdrop of confident imperial and metropolitan modernity.
The decisive historical event framing Butler’s argument was the Darwin-Wallace presentation at the Linnean Society of London on 1 July 1858, arranged by Charles Lyell and Joseph Dalton Hooker, and the publication of On the Origin of Species on 24 November 1859. Darwin’s mechanism of natural selection emphasized differential survival by chance variation—what Butler polemically calls luck—while Alfred Russel Wallace independently reached similar conclusions. Origin’s first print run sold out the day of publication, making selection the axis of British evolutionary thought. Butler’s book directly contests this ascendancy, recasting evolutionary change as guided by purpose and habit (cunning) and criticizing Darwin for minimizing teleology and the contributions of earlier thinkers.
Public controversy crystallized at the British Association meeting in Oxford on 30 June 1860, during the famous exchange in the University Museum involving Bishop Samuel Wilberforce, Thomas H. Huxley, and Joseph D. Hooker. The debate tied evolution to questions of Church authority and scientific method, popularizing a combative rhetoric that endured for decades. In 1864, Huxley, Hooker, John Lubbock, Edward Frankland, George Busk, Thomas Archer Hirst, William Spottiswoode, and others formed the X Club in London, consolidating influence across journals and societies. Butler’s book mirrors resistance to this new scientific establishment, portraying selectionist orthodoxy as a gatekeeping creed and positioning himself as an independent critic of its institutional power.
John Tyndall’s Belfast Address to the British Association in 1874, delivered at Belfast and widely reprinted, advocated the legitimacy of materialistic hypotheses in science and provoked intense ecclesiastical backlash throughout the United Kingdom. The address helped cement a public alignment of evolutionary theory with philosophical materialism. Butler’s work is connected to this moment as a teleological counterpoint: he accepts evolution but argues that purposeful habit and unconscious memory, not random variation, are the principal drivers of modification. The sacralization of Darwin after his death on 19 April 1882 and burial in Westminster Abbey intensified the cultural authority of selection. Butler’s 1887 volume intervenes in a climate that treated Darwinism as near-canonical science.
Butler’s colonial years in New Zealand (1860–1864) also informed his views. After leaving England in 1859, he settled in Canterbury Province, a Church of England settlement organized by the Canterbury Association (1848–1850) near Christchurch and Lyttelton, within a colony founded following the Treaty of Waitangi (1840). He ran sheep at Mesopotamia Station on the upper Rangitata River, observing husbandry, selective breeding, and animal habit firsthand. In 1863, he published the satirical essay Darwin among the Machines in the Christchurch Press, connecting technological development to evolutionary analogies. These experiences shaped his later insistence that practice, training, and acquired tendencies—cunning—offer a better explanatory model for organic change than impersonal luck alone.
Mass education and the press structured the reception of evolutionary debates. The Elementary Education Act of 1870 created elected school boards and expanded elementary schooling; the 1880 Act made attendance compulsory, enlarging a literate audience for science. Nature (founded 1869 by Norman Lockyer) and organs like the Athenaeum and the Academy became arbiters of reputation. Figures close to Darwin, including George J. Romanes, reviewed and policed dissenting views, while controversies such as the vivisection debates led to the Royal Commission of 1875 and the Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876. Butler’s book is connected to this print and policy environment, crafted to persuade educated lay readers outside professional scientific networks.
Pre-Darwinian evolutionary currents shaped Butler’s alternative genealogy. Erasmus Darwin’s Zoonomia (1794–1796, Lichfield and London) proposed transformist ideas; Jean-Baptiste Lamarck’s Philosophie zoologique (1809, Paris) advanced use-and-disuse and the inheritance of acquired characteristics; Robert Chambers’s Vestiges (1844, Edinburgh/London) popularized progressive evolution. Butler revived these strands in Evolution, Old and New (1879) and Unconscious Memory (1880), accusing Charles Darwin of underplaying such antecedents. Luck, or Cunning synthesizes this rehabilitation, arguing that inherited habit and purposive adjustment—cunning—explain modification more convincingly than chance variation. The book thus mirrors Victorian disputes over priority, fairness, and the moral horizons of science, contesting a narrative of progress dominated by London-based selectionists.
As social and political critique, the book challenges the concentration of authority within metropolitan scientific networks and their alignment with a laissez-faire ethos that treated competition and chance as natural law. By elevating cunning—practice, intention, and adaptive effort—it exposes anxieties about mechanization of life, the marginalization of nonprofessional voices, and the moral indifference implied by strict selectionism. Butler’s polemic points to class-inflected gatekeeping in journals and societies, questions the public costs of materialist orthodoxy amid vivisection controversies, and resists the sanctification of scientific heroes. In doing so, it articulates a broader Victorian unease with expertise unmoored from ethical purpose, proposing a teleological counter-vision of organism and society.
