0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Unconscious Memory," Samuel Butler explores the intricate tapestry of human consciousness through the lens of memory. Employing a distinctive blend of philosophical inquiry and scientific exploration, Butler delves into the nature of remembrance, positing that memories can exist beneath our conscious awareness, influencing our thoughts and actions. His style is both reflective and analytical, weaving together personal anecdotes with broader philosophical discourse typical of the late 19th century, as he challenges contemporary understandings of psychology and the mind. Samuel Butler was a polymath, a novelist, essayist, and social critic, known for his unorthodox views on evolution and culture. His experiences growing up in a rigid religious community and later engaging with the scientific discourse of his time likely shaped his inquisitive mind. Notably, Butler's interactions with Charles Darwin's theories may have propelled him to investigate the unconscious dimensions of human experience, thus revealing the interplay between instinct and cognition. For readers eager to engage with foundational ideas in psychology and philosophy, "Unconscious Memory" offers a compelling exploration of the unseen forces shaping our lives. Butler's thought-provoking arguments and evocative prose will not only challenge your perceptions of memory but also encourage a deeper reflection on self-awareness and the complexities of the human psyche. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
Unconscious Memory
Table of Contents
Introduction
Unconscious Memory proposes that the life of an organism is guided by a vast reservoir of unrecognized remembrance, so that inheritance, development, and instinct are expressions of memory operating beneath awareness, a thesis through which Samuel Butler contests prevailing evolutionary explanations, reframes the relation between purpose and accident, and invites readers to consider heredity as a form of communication by which the past acts within the present to shape conduct before consciousness arises, raising persistent questions about how living beings act aptly prior to experience and about what, in the life sciences, should count as a satisfying account of mind and mechanism.
Published in 1880, Unconscious Memory belongs to Butler’s series of non-fiction investigations into evolution and mind that includes Life and Habit (1877) and Evolution, Old and New (1879). Written in late Victorian Britain, the book participates in a crowded, contentious conversation about how to explain organic change and mental phenomena. Butler engages contemporary scientific literature, notably the physiologist Ewald Hering’s 1870 address on memory, and places his own reflections alongside earlier evolutionary proposals associated with Lamarck and Erasmus Darwin. The result is not a laboratory treatise but an argumentative, essayistic work that situates biological theory within broader cultural and philosophical debates.
Readers encounter a polemical yet curious voice that moves between close reading of scientific claims and wide-ranging analogies drawn from ordinary experience. Butler presents a sustained line of reasoning rather than experimental data, inviting the audience to follow his definitions, distinctions, and examples as he recasts inheritance as a mode of remembering. The mood is exploratory and provocative, sometimes combative, often witty, and consistently attentive to how words shape thought. The book offers the experience of an intellectual debate conducted in clear Victorian prose, where a literary sensibility is brought to bear on questions usually reserved for physiology and natural history.
At the center of the argument is the proposal that habits formed across generations become embodied as tendencies that guide growth and action, thereby linking instinct with memory. This view prompts reflections on continuity of identity, the formation of character, and the extent to which organisms carry forward the solutions of their ancestors. Butler examines how regularities in life might be explained by reference to stored experience rather than by chance alone, and he asks what kinds of causes satisfy the human demand for understanding. In doing so, he wrestles with the boundary between mind and matter without collapsing one into the other.
The book engages directly with evolutionary theory, challenging the sufficiency of explanations that emphasize selection while downplaying the role of inherited directionality. Butler revisits ideas associated with Lamarck and Erasmus Darwin, not to restore older systems wholesale, but to reopen questions he felt had been prematurely settled. He scrutinizes how scientific narratives assign influence and priority, urging a more capacious account of the sources of biological order. By bringing Hering’s reflections into the discussion, Butler situates his own thesis within a broader intellectual lineage, positioning memory as a key concept for interpreting development, instinct, and the transmission of form.
Stylistically, Unconscious Memory blends analysis with analogy, proceeding by carefully staged contrasts and thought experiments that clarify what different theories can and cannot explain. Butler’s method is dialogic in spirit: he addresses possible objections, refines terms, and tests his claims against familiar examples, all while maintaining a steady, ironic poise. The prose invites readers to weigh competing explanations on their merits rather than on institutional authority. This approach reflects Butler’s broader conviction that scientific and literary reasoning can illuminate one another, and that clarity of language is indispensable when sorting causes from descriptions in complex living processes.
For contemporary readers, the book’s significance lies less in its alignment with any single school than in the questions it insists on keeping open. What does it mean to inherit a past that shapes present action without passing through awareness? How should competing kinds of explanation be judged in the life sciences? Butler’s reflections speak to ongoing interdisciplinary conversations about memory, heredity, identity, and the communication of knowledge across time. Unconscious Memory offers an invitation to think across categories, to scrutinize explanatory habits, and to consider how conceptual choices steer scientific inquiry as much as data do.
Synopsis
Samuel Butler’s Unconscious Memory (1880) develops and defends a central idea first advanced in his earlier Life and Habit: that heredity and instinct are forms of memory operating below awareness. The book situates this thesis within ongoing Victorian debates about evolution, clarifying Butler’s terminology, motives, and relations to contemporaries. He aims to replace mystical or purely mechanical accounts of development with a naturalized concept of memory extended to living matter. The work combines exposition, controversy, and documentation, including translations and reprints, to trace sources, establish priority, and provide readers with primary texts that shaped his position. The tone is argumentative but directed toward a constructive biological synthesis.
The leading proposition states that memory is a general function of organized matter, not confined to conscious recollection. On this view, the ease with which organisms repeat complex life-processes—such as growth, development, and instinctive behavior—reflects retained experience accumulated over innumerable generations. Butler calls this store “unconscious memory,” distinguishing it from personal, reflective memory. Individual habits furnish the model: repeated acts become automatic and require less attention. He extrapolates this principle to heredity, treating the embryo’s orderly stages and instinctive performances as rehearsals of ancestral acts now performed without awareness. The argument’s aim is to connect the familiar phenomena of habit with biological inheritance.
To render the claim concrete, Butler surveys examples where repetition and facility align: the chick’s pecking, the insect’s cocoon-making, and the embryo’s recapitulation of developmental steps. He portrays these as cases in which organisms “remember” how to proceed because their forebears have done so persistently. Nutrition and assimilation are similarly framed as remembered acts, expressed as reliable cooperation among tissues. Instinct, in this analysis, is not an inexplicable endowment, but a historically acquired habit deposited in the germ and reproduced in offspring. By treating growth and behavior as memory-driven, Butler proposes a common explanatory ground for development, inheritance, and adaptive action.
Set against this is a critique of explanations that rely solely on natural selection. While allowing selection a preservative role, Butler argues it cannot by itself generate the coordinated novelties required for intricate instincts and developmental regularities. He emphasizes use and disuse, with experienced actions leaving durable traces transmissible to descendants. He considers Darwin’s provisional hypothesis of pangenesis as an approach gesturing toward transmission of acquired states, yet he faults Darwin for underestimating the breadth of memory-like processes. Butler also situates his view historically, noting precursors such as Buffon and Erasmus Darwin, to show that hereditary habit and purposive adjustment are longstanding evolutionary themes.
A turning point in the book is Butler’s encounter with Ewald Hering’s 1870 lecture on memory as a function of organized matter. Butler found that Hering had independently articulated a closely allied doctrine. To clarify the relation, Unconscious Memory summarizes Hering’s arguments and includes a translation so readers can judge the agreements and differences. Butler adopts much of Hering’s framework—especially the universality of memory in organic systems—while pursuing his own emphases on habit, identity, and evolution. This documentation serves both to acknowledge precedence and to integrate Continental physiological ideas into the English debate about heredity and instinct.
Responding to critics, Butler distinguishes his naturalistic account from metaphysical speculations such as those associated with Eduard von Hartmann’s “Unconscious.” He maintains that “unconscious memory” names observable regularities in behavior and development, not a separate entity or occult agency. Reviews and objections are addressed with clarifications of terms and with analogies intended to keep the thesis within empirical bounds. Where possible, Butler ties claims to accessible experiences—learning a skill, acquiring a language, or automatizing movements—to illustrate how complexity can be grounded in cumulative practice that, over generations, becomes hereditary. The aim is to render the doctrine testable in spirit, if not yet experimentally formalized.
The book also explores implications for identity and continuity. Butler proposes that what links successive generations is a continuous chain of memory-like deposits, making descendants, in an important sense, extensions of ancestral life. He employs cases of habit retention and amnesia to differentiate kinds of memory, proposing that the hereditary kind underlies organismal stability through time. Language and custom supply analogies: communities preserve practices beyond individual lifespans, so too do germ-line transmissions preserve acquired facility. Without invoking later genetic concepts, Butler treats the hereditary mechanism as a repository of organized recollections, offering a way to understand both sameness of form and the emergence of directed change.
Applying the thesis, Butler revisits canonical examples of instinct—nest-building, migration, and tool-like behaviors—arguing that they show the signatures of long-practiced acts now executed automatically. He extends the notion to embryology, where the sequence of developmental events is interpreted as a patterned remembering of ancestral construction. The roles of use, disuse, and environment appear as conditions that strengthen or weaken the retention of acts. Natural selection is retained as a filter that preserves effective memories, while origination is ascribed to practice stabilized through inheritance. Throughout, Butler relies on comparisons with learning and skill acquisition to make the continuity from conscious to unconscious memory intelligible.
The book concludes by drawing together its historical, argumentative, and documentary strands. Butler presents unconscious memory as a unifying principle that links habit, development, instinct, and evolution, while acknowledging predecessors and contesting competing frameworks. He urges that biological inquiry attend to how organized systems retain and reproduce successful acts, seeing in this a bridge between individual experience and hereditary transmission. By including translations and reprints, he positions the volume as both contribution and sourcebook. The overall message is that many regularities of life can be understood as memory rendered automatic and inherited, providing a coherent, naturalistic account of organismal continuity and change.
Historical Context
Unconscious Memory (1880) is not a narrative set in a fictional locale; its setting is the late-Victorian scientific world, centered in London. Samuel Butler wrote from Clifford’s Inn, off Fleet Street, amid publishers, journals, and debating societies, and the book was issued in London in 1880 by David Bogue. Its places are lecture halls of the Royal Institution, meetings of the Royal Society and British Association, and the pages of Nature and the Athenaeum. The time is one of rapid industrialization and professionalized science in Britain, when evolutionary theory, physiology, and psychology were transforming public discourse and unsettling the authority of church and gentlemanly tradition.
The publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (London, 1859) and the public clash at the Oxford University Museum on 30 June 1860 between Bishop Samuel Wilberforce and Thomas H. Huxley set the stage for two decades of debate over natural selection. Joseph Dalton Hooker’s intervention that day, and the ensuing institutional consolidation of Darwinism, created an intellectual climate in which dissent had high stakes. Butler’s Unconscious Memory responds to this ferment by challenging strict natural selection, arguing that heredity involves stored, purposive “memory.” The book mirrors the period’s polarization by scrutinizing Darwinian authority and revisiting earlier evolutionary sources, including Erasmus Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck.
Arguments about heredity intensified after Darwin’s The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication (1868), which advanced the pangenesis hypothesis of hereditary “gemmules.” Fleeming Jenkin’s 1867 critique in the North British Review had already pressed the problem of blending inheritance. Unknown to most contemporaries, Gregor Mendel had presented pea experiments in Brünn (1865) and published them in 1866; these laws would be rediscovered only in 1900 by Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns, and Erich von Tschermak. Butler locates Unconscious Memory within this contested terrain, recasting heredity as the transmission of accumulated “habit” and experience—an organic memory—thus offering an alternative to particulate gemmules and to what he perceived as Darwin’s excessive emphasis on selection.
A decisive influence was Ewald Hering’s lecture “Über das Gedächtnis als eine allgemeine Funktion der organisierten Materie,” delivered at Prague in 1870 and printed in the Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Hering, a German physiologist, argued that memory is a general function of organized matter, extending beyond the nervous system. Butler translated Hering’s essay and appended it to Unconscious Memory (1880), adopting its physiological language to argue that heredity is memory embodied in germ cells and tissues. This concrete cross-Channel exchange—Prague to Vienna to London—gave Butler a scientific scaffold and historical warrant for treating “memory” as a biological, not merely psychological, mechanism.
The consolidation of British “scientific naturalism” after 1864—embodied by the X Club (Huxley, Hooker, John Tyndall, Herbert Spencer, John Lubbock, Edward Frankland, Thomas Archer Hirst, George Busk, William Spottiswoode)—shaped the reception of evolutionary theories. Nature (founded 1869, edited by Norman Lockyer) and the Royal Institution amplified this network. Tyndall’s Belfast Address to the British Association (1874) openly championed evolutionary materialism, igniting a public controversy with theologians. Butler’s book was entangled in these circuits: his evolution works, including Life and Habit (1877) and Unconscious Memory (1880), were criticized in journals such as Nature, often by Darwin’s allies like George John Romanes. The polemics sharpened Butler’s insistence on priority, sources, and fair acknowledgment in evolutionary science.
Victorian reforms in education and the professions altered who could speak with authority about nature. The Elementary Education Act (1870) expanded literacy; the Universities Tests Act (1871) removed Anglican religious tests at Oxford, Cambridge, and Durham, hastening secularization of academic posts; and new laboratories and professorships institutionalized research. These shifts created a credentialed elite of scientific experts whose consensus could marginalize heterodox views. Unconscious Memory reflects this social transformation by challenging the gatekeeping of specialized journals and committees, insisting that central questions of heredity and evolution remain open. Butler’s critique of scientific etiquette and priority disputes must be read against the era’s rapid professionalization and the narrowing of acceptable discourse.
Butler’s own colonial experience in New Zealand (1859–1864), where he farmed sheep near the Rangitata in Canterbury and wrote A First Year in Canterbury Settlement (1863), also informs the book’s social angle. The Canterbury Association’s planned Anglican colony at Christchurch and Lyttelton met the realities of a global commodity economy and settler self-reliance. This encounter with practical adaptation, habit-formation, and improvisation in a frontier setting under the British Empire’s expansion (notably after the 1850s) influenced Butler’s skepticism toward metropolitan orthodoxies. Unconscious Memory translates such lessons into biology: learned routines, once stabilized across generations, resemble “habit” nested in organisms—a social analogy that bolsters his argument about organic memory.
As a social and political critique of the period, Unconscious Memory exposes how Victorian authority migrated from pulpit to laboratory without relinquishing hierarchical habits. It questions the concentration of intellectual power in elite societies and journals, scrutinizes priority and citation practices, and resists a purely mechanistic, selection-only account that dovetailed with laissez-faire ideologies. By emphasizing inherited “habit” and purposive adaptation, Butler challenges narratives that naturalized competition and dismissed agency. The book thus indicts the era’s technocratic gatekeeping, its conflation of consensus with truth, and its readiness to marginalize dissenting lines of inquiry, offering an alternative vision of science accountable to history, fairness, and broader human experience.
