73,99 €
A wave of corporate mergers, acquisitions, restructuring, and similar transactions has created unprecedented opportunities for those versed in contemporary risk arbitrage techniques. At the same time, the nature of the merger wave has lent such transactions a much higher degree of predictability than ever before, making risk arbitrage more attractive to investors. Surprisingly, there is little transparency and instruction for investors interested in learning the latest risk arbitrage techniques. Merger Arbitrage - A Fundamental Approach to Event-Driven Investing helps readers understand the inner workings of the strategy and hedge funds which engaged in this investment strategy. Merger arbitrage is one of the most commonly used strategies but paradoxically one of the least known. This book puts it in the spotlight and explains how fund managers are able to benefit from mergers and acquisitions. It describes how to implement this strategy, located at the crossroad of corporate finance and asset management, and where its risks lie through numerous topical examples. The book is split into three parts. The first part, examining the basis of merger arbitrage, looks at the key role of the market in takeover bids. It also assesses the major changes in the financial markets over recent years and their impact on M&A. Various M&A risk and return factors are also discussed, alongside the historical profitability of merger arbitrage, the different approaches used by fund managers and the results of academic studies on the subject. The second part of the book deals with the risk of an M&A transaction failing in terms of financing risk, competition issues, the legal aspects of merger agreements and administrative and political risks. The third part of the book examines specificities of M&A transactions, comprehensively covering hostile takeovers and leveraged buyouts. Each part contains many recent examples and case studies in order to show how the various theories and notions are put into practice. From researching prospects and determining positions, to hedging and trading tactics, Lionel Melka and Amit Shabi present the full complement of sophisticated risk arbitrage techniques, making Merger Arbitrage a must read for finance and investment professionals who want to take advantage of the nearly limitless opportunities afforded by today's rapidly changing global business environment. The book builds on its authors' diverse backgrounds and common experience managing a merger arbitrage fund, providing readers with an enriching inside view on M&A operations. Translated by Andrew Fanko and Frances Thomas
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 485
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2012
Contents
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Foreword
Acknowledgements
About the Authors
Introduction
Part I: The Arbitrage Process
Chapter 1: The Arbitrage Process The Role of the Market in Mergers and Acquisitions
1.1 STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO THE FINANCIAL MARKETS
1.2 CHANGES TO M&A PRACTICE
1.3 MARKET EVALUATION OF M&A
1.4 TYPES OF SYNERGIES AND WAVES OF M&A
Chapter 2: The Different Types of Transactions
2.1 TYPES OF TRANSACTIONS
2.2 THE CHOICE OF PAYMENT METHOD
Chapter 3: Risk and Return Factors
3.1 THE DIFFERENT OUTCOMES
3.2 M&A TIMETABLE
Chapter 4: The Merger Arbitrage Strategy
4.1 THE LONG-TERM PROFITABILITY OF THE STRATEGY
4.2 THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE RETURNS
4.3 THE DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE STRATEGY DEVELOPED BY SPECIALIST MANAGERS
4.4 THE CONCLUSIONS OF ACADEMIC STUDIES
Part II: Analyzing the Risk of Failure
Chapter 5: Analyzing the Risk of Failure Financing Risk
5.1 THE DIFFERENT FINANCING METHODS
5.2 THE LEGAL SECURITY OF THE FINANCING
Chapter 6: Competition Risk
6.1 ORIGINS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF COMPETITION LAW
6.2 COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND APPROVAL PROCESS
6.3 COMPETITION REMEDIES
6.4 COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN EVALUATION
6.5 THE ALLOCATION OF COMPETITION RISK BETWEEN THE PARTIES
Chapter 7: Legal Aspects of Merger Agreements
7.1 THE DIFFERENT DOCUMENTS
7.2 STRUCTURE OF A MERGER AGREEMENT
7.3 MAC CLAUSES
7.4 OTHER LEGAL CLAUSES
Chapter 8: Other Risks
8.1 ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORIZATIONS
8.2 POLITICAL RISK
8.3 NATURAL-DISASTER RISK
8.4 THE RISK OF FRAUD OR FALSE ACCOUNTING
Part III: Specific Transactions
Chapter 9: Specific Transactions Hostile Transactions
9.1 A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF HOSTILE TRANSACTIONS
9.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR HOSTILE OFFERS AND HOW THEY DIFFER IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES
9.3 DEFENSE MECHANISMS
9.4 REGULATORY DIFFERENCES IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES
Chapter 10: Leveraged Buyouts
10.1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF LBOs
10.2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF PRIVATE EQUITY
10.3 HOW LBOs AFFECT ARBITRAGE
Conclusion
Glossary
References
Index
© 2013 by John Wiley & Sons,Ltd
Translated by Andrew Fanko and Frances Thomas from the French edition Arbitrage sur Fusionset Acquisitions, Le Merger Arbitrage published in 2012 by Economica
Registered Office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Melka, Lionel. Merger arbitrage : a fundamental approach to event-driven investing / Lionel Melka, Amit Shabi. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-118-44001-8 (cloth) – ISBN 978-1-118-44006-3 (ebk.) – ISBN 978-1-118-44007-0 (ebk.) – ISBN 978-1-118-44008-7 (ebk.) 1. Arbitrage. 2. Consolidation and merger of corporations. 3. Stock exchanges and current events. I. Shabi, Amit. II. Title. HG4521.M4345 2013 658.1'62–dc23
2012029646
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
ISBN 978-1-118-44001-8 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-118-44006-3 (ebk) ISBN 978-1-118-44007-0 (ebk) ISBN 978-1-118-44008-7 (ebk)
Cover images: Shutterstock.com
To our beloved children: Tia, Ilaï, Raphaël and Gabriel
Foreword
In my professional life I have learned to respect the power and influence of merger arbitrage in the transaction process. Good fortune gave me the opportunity to do so in very different ways: as an investment banker in charge of M&A deals; as an investor in event-driven funds; and most recently as a director of a public company under offer. If you are contemplating being involved in financial markets in any of these capacities, you must read this book.
During my many years at one of the greatest investment banks in history, Morgan Stanley, I had the privilege to execute several of the largest mergers, acquisitions, takeovers, and defenses on both sides of the Atlantic. My career there (from 1986 to 2008) spanned the two decades which saw the greatest M&A bull market in recent history. Activity charts mark the beginning of what became known as “merger mania” towards the end of 1983; one of the deals which started it was Pennzoil's offer to buy 20% of Getty Oil in December of that year. Ultimately all of Getty Oil was acquired by Texaco; the deal was large, complex and contested, a perfect combination for merger arbitrage which provided an early, yet spectacular, opportunity to deploy capital and to take calculated risk. For many of them, playing that situation paid off, and, although it was before my time on Wall Street, I knew it had been a defining moment.
The development of professional merger arbitrage logically accompanied the enormous wave of merger activity which followed, and soon the question “what are the arbitrageurs doing?” became central to understanding and sometimes predicting the outcome of takeovers. To put it simply, merger arbitrageurs analyze transaction risks in public deals and put capital to work, increasingly in scale, by going long or short on financial instruments from different issuers in ways that reflect their risk assessment and ultimate convictions. The combined strength of such convictions and of the capital used to back them might result, for example, in a higher price for the security “in play” – e.g. the stock of a public company under offer. Nowhere would this be more relevant than in contested situations, whether as a result of a hostile bid or competitive offers for a company. To quote a business magazine article from the previous decade, “these are the situations M&A bankers live for”. The same could be said of merger arbitrageurs, although more plain-vanilla agreed transactions have long constituted the bulk of the activity for all.
This is clearly a risky business, but so is deal making. As a banker, you know the transactions you've worked on and which never saw the light of day – these are many in number. I always told my colleagues “there will be more reasons for a deal not to happen than for it to happen”. A dose of humility is healthy in the banking business, and not just because of the current climate. Investment bankers often felt that the toughest part of the job was to get to the announcement stage; yet this was only the beginning of the story for the market, of which merger arbitrage instantly became a key component. Risk is no longer about pursuing alternative strategies to the deal in question, or testing the CEO's and board's resolve in following it through; attention moves to market reaction, interloper action, regulatory delays, defensive moves, and other execution risks. This is the time for merger arbitrageurs to deploy their skills in assessing these risks, to mitigate them using the range of available securities and derivatives instruments, and to push for their preferred outcome. So for their transactions to be successful, M&A bankers need to know and understand what the merger arbitrageurs are thinking at all times.
The authors of this book have chosen several notable transactions to illustrate these points with competence and clarity. I was involved in the Alcan-Pechiney deal as Alcan's banker, and encourage you to read the case study. It has many of the components of a textbook unsolicited offer: compelling strategic logic, as evidenced by prior discussions between the two companies; vigorous bidding and takeover defense strategies; powerful and positive market reactions for both stocks; and finely conducted negotiations which ultimately resulted in an agreement. I remember the question the board of Alcan asked me the first time I met with them in Montreal: “Can it be done?”. The question essentially related to whether it was then possible to acquire a French company via a hostile offer. I replied without hesitation: “Yes it can”. Certainly by 2003, European equity markets were driven by institutional shareholders – including merger arbitrageurs – whose objective is to maximize the value of their investment. It was increasingly hard for any target company to successfully reject an opportunity to get a premium without providing shareholders with a better option. Indeed, in my entire career, the “just say no” defense worked only once, in 1999, when Société Générale rebuffed BNP's offer, in an exceedingly complicated situation. Going back to Alcan/Pechiney, it was significant that we received the “Deal of the Year” award in 2003 from the “Club des Trente”, an association of major French CFOs, as a mighty French industrial name had fallen to shareholders' power.
Deal stories, and their lessons, could be the subject of another book. But ensuring that you become a successful investment banker is not the only reason you should be familiar with the content of this book. Merger arbitrage provides investors, in the great tradition of other forms of securities arbitrage, with a highly effective way to invest capital. As this book will explain, arbitrage plays a significant role in providing liquidity and ensuring the good functioning of securities markets. Investing in so-called event-driven funds has therefore become a permanent feature of asset management. Many portfolios include allocations to such funds, which are in principle uncorrelated to macroeconomic trends – or indeed the value of securities such as bonds or stocks going up or down. Because the returns produced are based on arbitrage opportunities, such funds provide an attractive diversification from other types of investments. Some of the smartest people I have met on Wall Street run such funds.
Understanding the role of merger arbitrage is also critical for boards. As I write this, GDF-Suez has made an offer for the 30% it does not own in International Power, a company listed on the London Stock Exchange. I am a director of International Power and, for the first time, I was going to live through the deal experience from a board seat: how exciting for someone who has spent most of his life advising boards in such situations! I had not forgotten the grueling rhythm of meetings imposed on the directors of Gucci during the “handbag war” with LVMH (I was Gucci's banker), to the point where we joked “today there is a board meeting, so it must be Sunday”. Interestingly, the agreement between GDF-Suez and International Power provided that, for a period of time following the original business combination, all six independent directors must approve any offer for buying out the minorities; here we had the power to just say no. After due consideration, we rejected GDF-Suez' first offer at 390p; our investment banks provided us with relevant analyses and market views to support such a stance, and the stock price actually settled above the offer price. The message from shareholders was clear, yet it must have been challenging for merger arbitrageurs to factor our right to veto into their risk analyses. That additional element of uncertainty must have weighed on many people's decision to intervene: unlike in standard takeovers, the bidder could not bypass the board and take its proposal directly to the shareholders. In the end, we obtained a price of 418p, whereas the market price had stabilized at around 404p (I was involved in the negotiations). By the time you read this, shareholders will have voted on the transaction.
Finally, I would like to say that this excellent book gave me yet another opportunity to learn, this time as a student of merger arbitrage theory. Nowadays, it is impossible to understand how capital markets function without mastering the analyses contained herein. Indeed, you will read how complex such analyses need to be in certain takeover situations – dare I say sometimes in direct proportion to the creativity displayed by those involved? I referred above to the very complicated situation created by BNP's dual offer for Société Générale and Paribas, which had previously agreed to merge, so that all three stocks' movements became interdependent. A five-month rollercoaster was stopped with BNP taking control of Paribas but missing out on Société Générale. Other situations where I led the defense were certainly difficult to analyze at times, such as when Elf, in a bold defense move against Total's hostile offer, launched a counterbid for Total itself. This was an unprecedented defense strategy in 1999, which observers quickly named “Pac-Man” after the popular video game. In this case, which stock do you buy and which one do you short? To end the battle, Total raised its price and Elf agreed to merge. In another famous situation mentioned earlier, what were merger arbitrageurs to do when Gucci issued stock overnight (as could be done then on the Amsterdam exchange), first as part of an employee share ownership plan and then to white squire PPR (at a premium to the market price, of course), to stop competitor LVMH from taking creeping control of its capital? In a second stage which took place in 2004, PPR acquired the rest of Gucci, also at a premium. Merger arbitrageurs must have been surprised again in 2004 when Aventis announced it would issue “Plavix warrants” to holders of its shares should Sanofi (the maker of Plavix) succeed in its takeover plans, undoubtedly creating confusion in the marketplace and prompting a regulatory review of yet another innovative structure. Sanofi increased its offer, and Aventis agreed to merge. In 2006, merger arbitrageurs were taken aback when Arcelor, under a hostile offer from Mittal, agreed to sell a significant non-controlling stake to Severstal in exchange for assets and cash; Mittal had to raise its offer to see off the competition (and I received a bottle of champagne from a happy merger arbitrageur). Ultimately, in all these situations, merger arbitrageurs had to incorporate previously unseen complexities into their analyses; but ultimately, and without exception, these moves resulted in a superior outcome for shareholders, including merger arbitrageurs themselves.
There is a fifth and final reason why you should read this book, even if you do not plan on becoming a better banker, investor, director or scholar of market efficiency theories: it could very well set you on the path to becoming a merger arbitrage professional.
Michael Zaoui
Acknowledgements
We are deeply grateful for the invaluable guidance, ideas, and work from numerous colleagues and friends that have made this book possible.
Throughout the development of this text, many people have provided critical feedback and ideas for improvement. We would like to express our deepest thanks to Coralie Amar, Rachel Chicheportiche, Sébastien Dettmar, Emmanuel Dinh, Romain Geiss, Hako Graf von Finckenstein, Sophie Sassard, and Aurélie Yacoël. We are particularly indebted to them for their insightful suggestions and valuable expertise.
Valuable and constructive observations have also come from Fabrice Anselmi, Séverin Brizay, Thomas Candillier, Christoph Englisch and Donat Vidal-Revel, who have read and reviewed earlier drafts of this text. Without their patience, enthusiasm, and wise comments, this book would not have been the same. The pleasure of discussing these topics with them was worth every moment spent writing this book.
We would like to thank Michel Cicurel, CEO of LCF Rothschild, who wrote the foreword of the French edition, as well as our editors there, Delphine Lautier, Jean Pavlevski and Yves Simon.
Michael Zaoui did us the great honor of contributing to this work by writing its foreword. His experience as Morgan Stanley's Head of Mergers and Acquisitions provided us with invaluable additional expertise and details.
On this same note, we want to thank Serge Benchetrit, Madison Marriage and Matthieu Pigasse for endorsing the book.
We are particularly grateful to Ygal Abergel, David Amar, Dr Teddy Amar, Clarisse Anger, Régis Attuil, Jeremy Benamara, Stéphanie Bianco, Vanessa Bogaardt, Stéphane Bourdon, Antonine Chenevier, Didier Chicheportiche, Nicolas Contis, Itai Dadon, Bertrand Demesse, Fabien Dersy, Tony Esposito, Grégory Gallais, Ori Gruenpeter, Nicole Guedj, David Haller, Vinh-Thang Hoang, Marc Irisson, Yaël Lebrati-Attuil, Alain Leclair, Mathieu Lemesle, Isabelle Lixi, Sébastien Mathieu, Serge Muller, Roger Nordmann, Dr Marion Nordmann-Amar, Philippe Paquet, Rozenn Peres, Michel Piermay, Bénédicte Provost, Jacques-Henri Rieme, Antoine Rolland, Benjamin Rouach, Yakhara Sembene, Oren Shilony, Edouard Sigwalt, Ludovic Uzan, Serge and Valérie Ventura, Tom Wilner and Marcelle Yacoël for making this possible.
We would also like to thank the editors and staff at John Wiley & Sons – Werner Coetzee, Aimée Dibbens, Bill Falloon, Samantha Hartley, Jennie Kitchin, Lori Laker and Vivienne Wickham – for their constant support as well as their helpful comments and suggestions throughout the realization of this project. The team of editors who worked on this book improved it tremendously.
Special thanks go to Harriet Agnew, Caroline Allen, David Benoit, Deirdre Brennan, Mary Campbell, Marietta Cauchi, Barry Cohen, Nicola Culley, Kris Devasabai, Joy Dunbar, Tony Griffiths, Jessica Hodgson, William Hutchings, Sam Jones, Tara Lachapelle, Margie Lindsay, Bill McIntosh, Mike Prest, Phil Serafino, Mimosa Spencer, Martin Steward, Sten Stovall, Meg Tirrell, Albertina Torsoli and Will Wainewright.
We also want to express immeasurable gratitude to our families and friends for their encouragement and support throughout this project: special thanks to Elad, Hana, Marcelle, Moti and Ofer Shabi, and Marie-Paule, Nicole, Pascal and Raymond Melka.
We would like to thank François Bourriguen for his contributions and the quality of his research. Bright, patient, and creative, he showed great care and dedication in his work – this book could not have been completed without him. All errors are naturally our own.
Finally, we are grateful to our children, Raphaël, Gabriel, Tia and Ilaï, who offered welcome relief from long stretches of writing and rewriting. Although they are only nine, eight, four and one, someday they will grow up and study the principles of finance. We hope this book provides its readers with some of the education and enlightenment that we wish for our own children.
About the Authors
Lionel Melka started his career in 1998 with Lazard Frères, where he undertook numerous M&A advisory engagements for blue-chip clients (LVMH, Saint-Gobain, Casino, France Telecom, Thomson, Air Liquide, Kingfisher) in a large scope of situations: privatizations, friendly and hostile takeover bids, LBOs, asset disposals, and IPOs. He then joined the M&A Department of Calyon, where he worked on various advisory assignments in the TMT-Defense team and LCF Rothschild in 2005, where he led many M&A cross-border assignments in various industry sectors.
Lionel is also a teacher at the University of Paris Dauphine, one of the leading academic institutions in Europe, in the fields of corporate finance, asset allocation, and alternative investments.
Amit Shabi is an ex-commander of an analyst team in a military intelligence unit of the Israel Defense Forces. After completing three years of army service, he moved to Paris to pursue his studies and obtained a Master's degree in Finance from Sorbonne University.
Amit started his career in the asset management department of LCF Rothschild. After this experience in traditional asset management, he worked in the Capital Markets divisions of MAN Group and Cantor Fitzgerald selling sophisticated financial instruments to hedge funds and institutional investors.
In 2006, Lionel and Amit cofounded Bernheim, Dreyfus & Co., a Paris-based asset manager specialized in alternative investments. Since then, they have used a merger arbitrage strategy to manage the Diva Synergy funds.
Introduction
It is Monday morning. Before the markets open, Salinas PLC announces a $50-per-share takeover bid for Migjorn Inc. Shares in the target company closed at $36 in New York on Friday. Trading will begin again at any moment. What price will Migjorn shares open at? Who will buy? Who will sell? Does that really matter in the grand scheme of things? And, perhaps most importantly, is there a way of making money from the situation?
Arbitrageurs spend their working days asking themselves these questions, analyzing operations and taking (or not, as the case may be) positions on the stock market. In friendly operations, they often act in the buyer's favor and facilitate the conclusion of the transaction. In hostile operations, they tend to be more of an arbitrator, in terms of the “fairness” of the final price, by rotating capital as soon as the takeover bid is announced.
Merger arbitrage is one of the event-driven alternative strategies applied by hedge funds, whereby they trade in the stocks of companies that find themselves at a particular stage in their life cycle. This could be a merger, a takeover bid, a restructuring or insolvency proceedings. Merger arbitrage was developed in the 1940s by Gus Levy at investment bank Goldman Sachs and enjoyed its heyday during the fourth big wave of mergers and acquisitions in the 1980s. Let us first give a brief reminder of what a hedge fund is and what merger arbitrage is.
Hedge funds are investment vehicles that aim to deliver absolute returns with no benchmark. They are generally free to invest in any asset class, and insofar as they do not raise money from the public, they are subject to very little regulation, if any. They can use leverage and sell short (something we will come across several times in this book). Hedge fund managers, who invest significant sums in the funds, are paid according to their performance. They may be vilified by some, but they actually play a positive role by adding liquidity to the markets and helping the prices of the financial assets in which they trade to level off more quickly.
Merger arbitrage aims to make a profit on the difference between the market price of a stock and the price put forward in a takeover bid. The price at which the shares of a target company settle after an operation has been announced is an implicit indicator of whether arbitrageurs feel the transaction will go ahead. Where there is competition (a situation often instigated by the target company's management), the market price is usually higher than the bid price. In general, offer execution risks and uncertainties surrounding the ability of the bidder to complete the transaction are more likely to get an arbitrageur's attention. In these cases, the market price will tend to be less than the bid price, generating a difference known as the spread.
This spread varies depending on how likely the transaction is to fail. There are risks related to:
the financing of the transaction;the intervention of government bodies and other regulatory authorities (such as competition regulators);the shareholder vote (or reaching approval thresholds for takeovers);the implementation of legal clauses featuring in the merger agreement.If these conditions precedent are met, the spread will gradually narrow as the transaction completion date approaches.
All these risks can appear after an M&A transaction has been announced, and they must therefore be evaluated by arbitrageurs. In order to capitalize on the control premium usually offered by a buyer, some investors try to buy shares in potential target companies even before a deal is announced. These pre-event strategies are founded on several decisions that relate to risks of varying importance.
The most risky strategy is to take positions on the basis of pure speculation, a practice adopted by Ivan Boesky, who was the inspiration for the Gordon Gekko character in Oliver Stone's film Wall Street. At the other end of the scale, there are arbitrageurs who wait until the buyer and the target company have signed a definitive agreement. Others make their move somewhere in the middle: upon the entry of an activist investor, a mere approach, advanced discussions, or a conditional offer. In this book, we will look only at deals that have been formally announced, as these represent the majority of situations targeted by arbitrageurs.
Whatever your opinion of the financial markets (an instrument of economic efficiency and resource allocation, or a sounding box for short-term and copycat behavior), it is these markets that decide the fate of major mergers and acquisitions. This notion of “market” has, however, become increasingly diverse and fragmented. The presence of new types of investor (US/UK mutual funds, arbitrage funds, activist funds, sovereign wealth funds, etc.), each with their own incentives and constraints, makes it increasingly difficult to analyze investment decisions. The M&A market has also undergone major changes: the outbreak of hostile bids; the rise of private-equity firms; the emergence of buyers from emerging nations; and the growing impact of ratings agencies and government bodies (particularly competition authorities). All these mechanisms, changes, and issues are at the heart of this book.
The book is split into three parts. In the first part, we examine the basis of merger arbitrage. Chapter 1 looks at the key role of the market in takeover bids. It also assesses the major changes in the financial markets over recent years and their impact on M&A. Chapter 2 uses recent examples to describe the different types of transaction that provide investment opportunities for arbitrageurs. In Chapter 3, we look at the various M&A risk and return factors, such as the risk of the deal failing, the timetable, and bidding wars. Chapter 4 focuses on the historical profitability of merger arbitrage, the different approaches used by fund managers and the results of academic studies on the subject.
In the second part of the book, we look in more detail at the risks of an M&A transaction failing, which is the key factor in an investment process. Chapter 5 deals with financing risk, Chapter 6 with competition issues, Chapter 7 with the legal aspects of merger agreements and Chapter 8 with other risks, such as administrative and political risks.
The third part of the book examines specificities of M&A transactions. Chapter 9 deals with hostile takeovers and Chapter 10 with leveraged buyouts.
We will examine many recent examples and case studies in order to show how the various theories and notions are put into practice. These include Dow Chemicals' purchase of Rohm & Haas to illustrate financing risk and Oracle's takeover of Sun to demonstrate competition risk. Sanofi's purchase of Genzyme will reveal the dynamics of a hostile takeover, while the takeover of Del Monte Foods by a KKR-led consortium will illustrate the particular characteristics of a leveraged buyout.
Part I
The Arbitrage Process
The first part of this book describes the environment in which arbitrageurs work, as well as the major principles of merger arbitrage. Although they are often analyzed within the context of corporate financing, M&A are essentially tied to the financial markets and to changes therein, as the first chapter will show. In Chapter 2, we will study the financial mechanisms at work in the arbitrage process, as well as their different characteristics depending on the payment method of the transaction. The third chapter looks at the risk and return factors of merger arbitrage.The final chapter in Part I examines the historical performance of merger arbitrage and the different approaches adopted by specialist managers.
1
The Role of the Market in Mergers and Acquisitions
In spite of the many laws governing mergers and acquisitions (M&A), it is always the market that has the final say. Takeover bids may have to comply with various national and international laws, but by accepting or rejecting the terms of these bids the market is the ultimate judge of whether they are successful. Whether they like it or not, the market can sometimes usurp even the decision-making bodies of the target company in this role as the ultimate judge. As you might expect, the market's role of arbitrator is governed strictly by securities regulations, whether during bull periods, such as the beginning of the 1990s, or during more difficult times for financial markets, such as we have seen since 2008.
The concept of “the market” has evolved considerably. It now comprises as many different operators as strategies, and recent changes have served only to make it more fragmented and diverse in terms of the operators it groups together. These market operators include investment funds (arbitrage funds, private-equity funds, etc.), family offices, wealth managers, asset management units of major financial institutions, and individual shareholders. Each operator follows its own investment process in order to achieve its own goals, whether it is managing its own money or someone else's. All this means that the market, now more than ever, is a complex sum of individual interests. The partial or total liquidation of many so-called alternative investment funds, in the wake of early redemption requests from investors following the recent financial crisis, is a prime example. Moreover, the increase in trading volumes on global stock exchanges means a much greater turnover of shareholders in the share capital of companies. Combined with the different behaviors of market operators and the wide range of financial instruments available, this makes takeover bids – and the factors that determine whether they will be successful – more complex.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!