No fight E-Book

Silja Nathe

• Herausgeber: BookRix
• Kategorie: Ratgeber
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2018

Beschreibung

Was ist Krieg und wieso gibt es Krieg und wieso stehen Bilinguale zwischen den Fronten, zwischen zwei Ländern? Das macht uns zu etwas Besonderem. Wie ticken Bilinguale und was können sie für den internationalen Frieden tun? Internationaler Frieden bedeutet hier die Sicherheit von Arbeit, Nahrung, Wohnung, Kleidung, Gesundheit, Recht und Selbstbestimmung. Mit Hilfe der Medizin, dem Recht und ihrer eigenen zwischennationalen Sicht hat die Autorin zum Frieden beigetragen. Silja Nathe ist eine studierte Bildende Künstlerin der University of Arts in London und studiert selbst. Ein kleiner Teil des Textes ist in Deutsch. What is war, and why is there war and why are bilinguals standing in between the fronts, in between two countries? That makes them special. How do bilingual people think and in which way can they contribute to international peace? International peace means here the security of work, food, clothes, house, health, law and self-determination. With the aid of medicine, law, and her own transnational view the author has contributed to peace. Silja Nathe is a studied Fine Artist from University of Arts in London, and makes self research. The chapter "notes" has not been translated.

Leseprobe

Silja Nathe

No fight

bilingual view on war

Ich weiß, dass ich Krieg schaffe, und ich weiß auch, dass ich Frieden schaffe. I know that I create war, and I know that I create peace.BookRix GmbH & Co. KG80331 Munich

Introduction

The concept dealing with peace and security issues was developed in the years 2009 until 2011 of my study and in particular in my self-study at the University of Hamburg. I did make some corrections in 2016. Health and security is seen as body well-being.

I therefore combined this research areas. As I never have had problems with guns before you may learn from my protection system to avoid and talk with people that offer gun violence to you.

Women are peaceful and to transfer this to script and writing was a challenge to me and my financial givers.

I want to reach the people like political actors in Germany and Europe, as well as the academia and public.

Fine Art is humanities, and together with other soft skills like economics, thus becoming a multi-lingual and multiprofessional style.

The soft and hard skills are inter-disciplinary, reaching from literature, linguistics, economics, fine art, medicine, migration, sociology, risk and danger policies, hermeneutics and multi-linguistics.

The soft and hard skills come from different countries and their way of organization, more exactly four different nations like Germany, former UdSSR and modern GUS, England, France, crossing the borders regularly every 5 years.

The Relationships to embassy, business, global companies and locals have been maintained and used for my concept.

Some principles

How I interpretate the movements of other humans depends not only from my eyes and ears. There are many non verbal parameters that coexist with the verbal at the same time.

=> verbal and non-verbal at the same time.

The non verbal is far more „stronger“ contained in communication (see Management by Coulter and Robbins) .

The socialization theory is based on the principle on socialization through movement, and not through sight. (Management by Coulter & Robbins)

=> Sight and Non sight.

How does the human perceive with all this different senses together?

Including the „clothes Sense“ and „Flat / House sense“ which are the physical senses that belong to the wohle body who needs warmth.

The theories

The theories I have invented so far are the following:

Laws of grammar in script versus laws of the human body

(Linguistics, script thinking, medicine, Fine arts)

The relationship of the human body and products – the inner and outer relationship of being

(Physics, biology, Fine arts)

Do women have another security system?

(different securities for female and male, migration and security)

 Do different countries have different securities or are they the same?

1. Talking and [ ]:

Body laws are not Grammar laws: The movement of the body is not only the movement when talking, thinking, or writing. 

1. What is talking?

Body laws are Grammar laws: There is the plan level (words), and the realization of the plan ([   ]), - not a word, anymore. 

The first point

The first point is about perceiving security.

Some matter-of-facts:

My breakfast: fried tomato, mushrooms, bread and butter from Edeka.

My bike: Böttcher, my university: Universität Hamburg.

Writing on my PC: Samsung and Microsoft.

Sitting on a chair: IKEA.

Going to my flat: Horx Immobilien.

Having lunch: REWE and AEG.

Putting laundry in the washing machine: AEG and ironing some shirts: P&C and Philips. Writing to a friend and finishing my text for Hufeland: MS Office 2007.

If I really want to be matter-of-fact concerning security, this is what I am doing every day.

The second point

It must be further scrutinized if the movements on work we do are important: PC work is bound to the keyboard. Can I, at all, talk to someone that does not use a PC? Or else never used one? No.

=> I do not understand “gun people”. I will not use a gun to make business. There are other ways of getting to money.

Am I therefore writing about my own security?

The way we bind our biological I (talking, selling) to the physical I (PRODUCTS) is interesting and there are many methods:

I could survive with Russian clothes, Russian food, and Russian flats: I have done it. It does work. So my biological German identity – my roots are German speaking - at this point was bound to the physical Russian identity.

The question that came up was: am I remaining German when all my physical things are Russian? That was the beginning of my multilingual identity. How else is biology connected to foreign physics considering all the products of all nations that I wear and use? Am I still German, at all? No. If German is defined as the language, you use, and the things you wear, and the activities you do in the same land, then it is like a crocodile in Africa, that would not naturally live in Germany. But the human has always travelled, and is not specifically bound to a country, like a tree that cannot move around. The human is free to go wherever he wants. He can become any nation, he wants to. Bilingual people are both nations, both together, without any problem.