Philosophy of Contemporary Spirituality E-Book

Vladimir Živković

• Herausgeber: WS
• Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 75

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2024

Beschreibung

Why do atheism, science and philosophy have no answers to the question of the Self? Why do religion and modern spirituality fall into more and more delusions? Gain knowledge about yourself and life through this book. Participate in philosophical debates through knowledge and experience and overcome the ignorance of the world. Contemporary and easy-to-understand philosophy of spirituality on the palm of your hand. Many people today will tell you that you have to be highly educated to have knowledge. However, informational knowledge is not the same as knowledge of Self and God. For such basic knowledge you need life, experience and self-belief. This book is very interesting because it will show you that wisdom does not require intelligence and broad education, but wisdom, effort, reason and own experience. Restore faith in yourself and your life, discover that knowledge is within you and escape the modern dogma of intelligence from the mind that tells us that someone else is smarter and more responsible than ourselves. The issues of theism and atheism, free will, consciousness, the purpose of life and creation, the explanation of God and the purpose of man, morality, relations between religions, spiritual movements, science and philosophy were touched upon. Emphasis was placed on the harmfulness of atheism and pointing out the weaknesses of atheism, of which there are many. The topics of rules of evidence, proofs that reveal God as well as God's laws of the Cosmos are excellently covered. We also have an explanation of what the soul is, what is the task of the soul, and with this book we can also gain insight into the Akashic Chronicle, the record of past lives. All in all, very diverse attractive questions with the author's experiential knowledge.

Leseprobe

PHILOSOPHY OF CONTEMPORARY SPIRITUALITY

“New Philosophy”

Živković Vladimir

Smashwords Edition

Copyright 2024

TABLE OF CONTENT

INTRODUCTION

SIMPLE THINGS

ATHEISM HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF GOD

ATHEISM DOESN'T CHANGE

WHY ATHEISTS HAVE NO ARGUMENT?

NEGATIVITY OF ATHEISM

PSYCHOTHERAPY AS IRRESPONSIBILITY

ATHEISM IS FICTION

ATHEISM IS WILLFUL WEAKNESS

THE POSITION OF ATHEISM

ATHEISM DOESN'T KNOW HOW

ATHEISM CREATES LIMITATIONS

AGNOSTICISM

MOUSSAKA

BAD ARGUMENT

ATHEISM AS AN ETERNAL STUMBLING STONE

DISBELIEF IN GOD AS MODERN INDOCTRINATION

ATHEIST CONSCIOUS LIE

THE SPIRITUAL PATH

SELF-LIMITATION

MORALITY

FAITH IS MOST IMPORTANT

CORRECTNESS OF RELIGIONS

ALL RELIGIONS ARE PURE KNOWLEDGE

WEALTH OF MAN THROUGH DIFFERENT RELIGIONS

INTOLERANCE TO ISLAM OR ANY RELIGION BRINGS WARS

NOTHING MAKES SENSE WITHOUT FAITH IN GOD

THEORY OF EVOLUTION AND SPIRITUAL SCRIPTURES

GOD'S GAME

GOD IS ONE

FAITH IS MANDATORY

ENDANGERING THE FAITH

GOD IS IN EVERYTHING, NOT JUST IN DEITIES

UNSUSPECTED AVATARS

CREATION AND THE LAWS OF THE COSMOS

ACCEPTANCE OF KARMA

WHY GOD THIS OR THAT?

NOTHING IS PRIVATE AND EVERYTHING IS PRIVATE

KNOWLEDGE IS SINCERE KARMIC EFFORT

FREE WILL AND PERFECTION OF GOD AND CREATION

EVIL IS A CHOICE

IT IS NOT GOD'S FAULT FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT

IS THE PARADOX AN ILLUSION OR AN ILLUSION A PARADOX?

WHAT IS A MIRACLE?

COMBINATION OF PHILOSOPHY AND SPIRITUALITY

IDENTITY

THE WATCHMAKER ANALOGY

WHAT IS EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE?

WHY DO INDIVIDUALS CLAIM THAT BELIEVERS DON'T RESPECT THE FACTS?

TASK OF TIME

WHY DOESN'T SCIENCE HAVE NOR WILL IT HAVE THE TRUTH ABOUT GOD-SELF?

COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT

DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT

WHO DOESN'T KNOW GOD?

SIN

EXPRESSION OF OWN IGNORANCE

ABOUT GOD

ONE

GOD IS RATIONALITY

SIMPLE LOGIC

GOD IS IMMATERIAL BUT COGNITIVE

ONLY GOD IS GOD

GOD AND SCIENCE

SCIENCE PROGRESS?

REAL EVOLUTION

SCIENCE IS CHILDREN'S PLAY IN THE SAND

THE RULE OF EVIDENCE IS PROVEN IRRELEVANCE

ENERGY IS CREATED

SCIENTIFIC COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

SCIENCE IS A BELIEF SYSTEM

SCIENCE IS FULL OF FLAWS AND IGNORANCE

INDOCTRINATION OF SCIENCE

SCIENCE IS LIMITED

KNOWLEDGE

REAL KNOWLEDGE

KNOWLEDGE IS FAITH

HOW TO GAIN KNOWLEDGE?

ANOTHER BASIC KNOWLEDGE

WHY DOES KNOWLEDGE (GOD) ESCAPE?

DOGMA IS DOGMA (be it religious, atheistic, philosophical or scientific)

KNOWLEDGE IS HEALING

IGNORANCE CAN BE A LIE

UNTRUTH

SOUL

THE SOUL IS SAFE

ILLUSION OR REALITY?

DARKNESS OF THE SOUL

VIBRATIONS

STAY HIGH

REALITY

LIFE

LIFE OR INCARNATION?

CERTAINTY (ethics and faith)

WEALTH (ethics)

REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY (lack of critical thinking)

ONLY GOD IS ETERNAL

CREATION IS VERY SIMPLE

CREATOR AND CREATION

YOU ARE ALREADY IMMORTAL

LIFE WITHOUT DESIRE OR LIFE WITH SUFFERING?

THE AKASHIC CHRONICLE

AKASHIC CHRONICLE – KNOWLEDGE OF PAST LIVES

FAITH IN GOD IS FAITH IN SELF

ABOUT PROVING

EVIDENCE

PROOF OF GOD

FAITH IN EVIDENCE DENIES ITSELF

LACK OF EVIDENCE

CLEAR LOGICAL PROOFS

CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

Due to the rapid development of science and technology, there has been a fast transfer of information through social networks and the media.

Because of this and many other improvements, science has taken precedence in society.

That happened primarily because man wants to be smart and wants to enjoy himself. Science enables him to do that. However, treating science as primary knowledge has no valid assumption or correct argument.

Science hasno spiritual knowledge. Knowledge about God, Self, happiness, freedom, wisdom, logic, morality, love, our origin, our destination, our consciousness and many other things is much more important than science itself and its achievements. More precisely, science does not have mainstream knowledge, but have very poor and often erroneous and delusional worldly knowledge.

Therefore, on social networks and in the media today we have a large number of debates and discussions, which is very good because it is a way to reach the truth and knowledge.

Many beliefs and groups appear that represent certain paths, disciplines and directions.

Let's say, religious people, modern spiritualists, philosophers, atheists, scientific groups clearly appear even politics has reached a huge potential for debate on social networks.

All of this results in many truths being conveyed at high speed and with exceptional clarity and certainty.

However, there is much more false information and ignorance being treated as knowledge.

In order for modern society to progress, all those untruths, false beliefs and false rules must be found, marked and exposed so that modern man in such good circumstances would gain true knowledge and happiness.

This means that there are many mistakes not only in the interpretation of religious teachings, but ignorance is greatly contributed by science, whose rules and methods are transferred in an impossible way to other spheres of life. Therefore, science is to blame for the decline of culture, faith in God and real experiential knowledge and human dignity.

Philosophy has always had a tendency towards thinking and intelligence, which is certainly not a bad thing, but it is bad when the goal and knowledge are missed. That's why philosophy, which flourished in the modern era, still does not have a valid scientific function in the world and among people, but this does not mean that philosophy does not have or will not realize its potential.

The vast majority of people have always been weak with knowledge, so the breakthrough of atheism is certainly something we should have expected. Nevertheless, atheism as doubt and ignorance must be exposed and sent into retirement.

People ask me all the time why I am so opposed to atheism.

The answer is very simple and clear. Atheism as atheism has only doubt and ignorance and as such only harms society and the individual. Atheism certainly attracts great unhappiness with the help of doubt and helplessness, which causes damage in the field of unhappiness and pessimism.

The new spirituality brought new spiritual disciplines and new explanations and approaches, which is certainly a great enrichment in relation to the outdated and often wrong interpretations of religions, but we must not lose sight of the fact that religions in their original teachings have the best knowledge about God and spirituality. Therefore, it is important to understand that the innovations in contemporary spirituality must not be considered better than religious teachings. What is needed is a transformation of the understanding of religious teachings and their application.

That is why in this book I will initiate an inexplicable and illogical transformation for many.

That transformation is actually not inexplicable and illogical, but the media and marketing made people forget their own experience, life and knowledge and forced people to constantly repeat that they are no longer capable of recognizing lies and ignorance.

I guarantee that this book will reborn every person who wants knowledge and wisdom.

SIMPLE THINGS

This book, unlike my previous books, will begin with some plain and simple philosophical truths, using spiritual knowledge as a base on which to arrive at experiential knowledge. Each quote is a final statement which, if we process it well and manage to look at it critically, will have a conclusion just like food that had to be chewed to give it the right taste. Therefore, each of these truths can be realized experientially and logically.

The book is definitely not only spiritual, but we use spirituality to crystallize the role of science and to understand that science has its limited sphere of action, to incorporate the basis of philosophy, to promote contemporary spirituality and religion and to mark atheism as one of the pernicious philosophies of today.

When we all do this, humanity will enter the New Age. Many call it the "Golden Age". Make that Golden Age come as soon as possible.

Good luck!

Quotes:

Education is not knowledge.

Science literally has no access to universal truth because of its sphere of action and methods.

Every man eventually becomes a knower, even an atheist, but not atheism.

Who can give us evidence for Hitchens Razor?

Who can give us evidence for the "burden of proof"?

Evidence is creation and Creation is evidence. Simple.

Ignorance is the source of evil.

Man and nature do not create anything. Man only observes uses and shapes what has already been created. Only God is the Creator.

They claim that the Creator must be proven through matter. They have the entire material Universe before them. What's the problem?

We will use blind faith to prove that faith in God is blind.

The atheist has no evidence that I need to give him evidence of God.

The only pure indoctrination is atheism which claims that God does not exist. Every other indoctrination has at least some truth in it.

Claiming that there is no evidence does not mean that there is no evidence. It just means you don't see or recognize the evidence.

Life and all of creation are clear and irrefutable evidence of God.

Fact:

- God has no alternative.

Physics is just the study of magic.

You are already immortal.

The paradox is omnipotence, not mental impotence.

Finding objects and determining the past based on those objects is not really evidence, but the mental construction of evidence and stories.

A widely accepted proven self-deception: no one knows God.

False assumption: we need evidence of God.

Consciousness seeks reality and experience, not evidence.

There is only one logic:the logic of the perfect God.

There is only one morality: the perfect morality of a perfect God.

Faith without knowledge exists, but knowledge without faith does not exist.

We do not need to know science that is not knowledge. Knowing ignorance is not knowledge.

Atheism is a false destructive logic. The proof is the senselessness of looking for meaning in the transient.

A human who does not seek God sincerely, remains forever in ignorance and hopelessness.

Only ignorance criticizes God. This is a proven fact.

Even when we dream, we believe that the dream is real until we wake up.

Reality is cognitive, not tangible.

The path to God is not of a purely intellectual nature because the mind has always been and remains ignorant.

Is there correct morality without knowledge of morality?