Polysaccharide Building Blocks E-Book

Youssef Habibi

• Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
• Kategorie: Fachliteratur
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 762

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2012

Beschreibung

This book is an archival reference for the evolving field of biomaterials and their applications in society, focusing on their composition, properties, characterization, chemistry and applications in bioenergy, chemicals, and novel materials and biomaterials. It has broad appeal due to the recent heightened awareness around bioenergy and biomass as potential replacements for petroleum feedstocks. The book is divided into three parts: cellulose-based biomaterials, chitin and chitosan biomaterials, and hemicelluloses and other polysaccharides. Each chapter addresses a separate biomaterial, discussing its chemical, physical, and biological attributes, and hones in on each compound's intrinsic tunability for numerous chemical transformations. In the current quest for a "green" economy and resources, this book will help inspire scientists towards novel sources for chemicals, materials, and energy in the years to come.

Leseprobe

Contents

Cover

Title Page

Copyright

Foreword

Preface

Contributors

Chapter 1: Recent Advances in Cellulose Chemistry

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Technical Important Cellulosics

1.3 Nucleophilic Displacement Reactions (SN)

1.4 Sulfation of Cellulose

1.5 Regioselectively Functionalized Cellulose Ether

1.6 Summary

1.7 Conclusion and Future Perspective

Acknowledgments

References

Chapter 2: Cellulosic Aerogels

2.1 Fascinating Aerogels: An Introduction

2.2 Cellulosic Aerogels

2.3 Summary

2.4 Future Perspectives

References

Chapter 3: Nanocelluloses: Emerging Building Blocks for Renewable Materials

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Structural and Morphological Features of Cellulose

3.3 Preparation of Nanocelluloses

3.4 Morphology of Nanocelluloses

3.5 Nanocellulose-Based Materials

3.6 Conclusion and Future PERSPECTIVES

Acknowledgments

References

Chapter 4: Interactions of Chitosan with Metals for Water Purification

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Extraction of Chitin

4.3 Preparation of Chitosan

4.4 Influence of the N-Deacetylation Method

4.5 Role of Repeated Treatment and the Addition of NaBH4

4.6 Interaction of Chitosan with Metals

4.7 Conclusion

References

Chapter 5: Recent Developments in Chitin and Chitosan Bio-Based Materials Used for Food Preservation

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Background

5.3 State of the Art of Applications of Chitosan in Biomatrices

5.4 Discussion

5.5 Summary

5.6 Future Trends

References

Chapter 6: Chitin and Chitosan as Biomaterial Building Blocks

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Background

6.3 Applications

6.4 Commercial Products

6.5 Summary

References

Chapter 7: Chitosan Derivatives for Bioadhesive/Hemostatic Applications: Chemical and Biological Aspects

7.1 Introduction

7.2 Biocompatibility and Cytotoxicity of Chitosan-Based Matrices

7.3 Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan and its Derivatives

7.4 Hemostatic Potential of Chitosan and its Derivatives

7.5 Conclusions

References

Chapter 8: Chitin Nanofibers as Building Blocks for Advanced Materials

8.1 Introduction

8.2 Chitin in the Cell Wall

8.3 Chitin Extraction from Its Natural Sources

8.4 Structural Features

8.5 Architecture of Chitin Nanofibers

8.6 Nanochitin-Based Materials

8.7 Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References

Chapter 9: Electrical Conductivity and Polysaccharides

9.1 Introduction

9.2 Textiles

9.3 Conductive Polysaccharide-Based Composites

9.4 Derivatives

9.5 Summary and Outlook

References

Chapter 10: Polysaccharide-Based Porous Materials

10.1 Introduction

10.2 Porous Polysaccharides

10.3 Starbon® Mesoporous Carbons

10.4 Summary and Future Perspectives

Acknowledgments

References

Chapter 11: Starch-Based Bionanocomposites: Processing and Properties

11.1 Introduction

11.2 Types of Nanoreinforcements

11.3 Processing of Starch Nanocomposites

11.4 Properties of Starch Nanocomposites

11.5 Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References

Chapter 12: Starch-Based Sustainable Materials

12.1 Introduction

12.2 Native Starch

12.3 Plasticized Starch

12.4 Starch-Based Biocomposites

12.5 Summary

References

Chapter 13: The Potential of Xylans as Biomaterial Resources

13.1 Introduction

13.2 Structural Diversity and Occurrence of Xylans in Plants

13.3 Application Potential of Polymeric and Oligomeric Xylan Isolates

13.4 Application Potential of Xylan Derivatives

13.5 Summary and Future Perspectives

Acknowledgments

References

Chapter 14: Micro- and Nanoparticles from Hemicelluloses

14.1 Introduction

14.2 Background

14.3 Preparation Strategies for Hemicellulose Particles

14.4 Examples for Hemicellulose Particle Application

14.5 Future Perspectives

References

Chapter 15: Nonxylan Hemicelluloses as a Source of Renewable Materials

15.1 Introduction

15.2 Background

15.3 Hemicelluloses as a Source of Renewable Materials

15.4 Applications of Hemicelluloses

15.5 Summary and Future Perspectives

References

Index

Copyright © 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey

Published simultaneously in Canada

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, [phone], fax [phone], or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, [phone], fax [phone], or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.

For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at [phone], outside the United States at [phone] or fax [phone].

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic formats. For more information about Wiley products, visit our web site at www.wiley.com.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:

Polysaccharide Building Blocks: A Sustainable Approach to the Development of Renewable Biomaterials / edited by Youssef Habibi, Lucian A. Lucia.

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-0-470-87419-6

1. Polysaccharides. I. Habibi, Youssef, editor of compilation. II. Lucia, Lucian A., editor of compilation.

QP702.P6P6395 2012

572′.566–dc23

2011046734

Printed in the United States of America

ISBN: 9780470874196

Foreword

The first polysaccharide was discovered in edible fungi while assessing their nutritional value in 1811, and was later named chitin. The bicentennial has been celebrated in a review article (Carbohydrate Polymers, 2012, 87: 995–1012) that enables us to appreciate the immense spiritual resources of the western countries; in the context of the American and French revolutions, they elaborated new scientific interests, research methodologies, and communication means. The botanical studies made in Europe on thousand of unknown plants imported from Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and other countries explored at that time, stimulated the characterization of cellulose, lignin, pectin, and starch. Research was often aimed at alleviating food shortages, not to say famine that the European populations had to face. One century later, those polysaccharides together with alginates, xanthans, and others were to play major roles as technological commodities and food ingredients.

The unique structures of polysaccharides combined with appealing properties such as atoxicity, hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, multichirality, and multifunctionality imparted by hydroxyl, amino, acetamido, carboxyl, and sulfate groups conferred additional importance to polysaccharides as valuable and renewable resources, chemically amenable to elaborated specialties.

In the last quarter of the twentieth century, prominent research topics among others have been the following: technology (textiles, personal care items, drug delivery); food technology (quality of foods and drinks, functional foods, dietary supplements); biochemistry (hemostatics, blood anticoagulants, wound dressing, bone regeneration, glycosaminoglycans); enzymatic modification and inhibition of the biosynthesis (synthases, hydrolases, insecticides); environmental protection (industrial waste reclamation); combination with synthetic polymers and inorganics (grafting, polyelectrolyte complexes, spontaneous association, composites).

As a consequence of the great steps forward made in the elucidation of the enzyme structures and in the understanding of molecular recognition, in those years some research groups brought forward the concept that poly- and oligosaccharides had to be seen as components of supramolecular structures, and that associations with proteins (glycoproteins/proteoglycans) are necessary in vivo for molecular recognition, association, adhesion, bioactivity, and more. For example, the ordered and most elaborated structures of aggrecan and other compounds present in the extracellular matrix, elegantly confirm that the single components are to be seen as natural building blocks. Moreover, the complex structure of the carbohydrate moieties of glycoproteins contains biochemical messages. This way of thinking provides inspiration today for targeted drug delivery, tissue engineering and imaging, transfection, and other complex biotechnological manipulations that are prolonging our life expectation and contribute to our welfare. Polysaccharides (alone or in reciprocal combination) in the form of hydrogels, aerogels, and membranes, for instance, exert control over differentiation of stem cells, proliferation and phenotype preservation, and provide most satisfactory results in tissue engineering.

At present advanced technologies permit to isolate and produce large amounts of nanosized crystalline building blocks, particularly those of cellulose and chitin. The nanofibrils obtained via mechanochemical disassembly of said polysaccharides can be manufactured with good yield but minimum environmental impact and energy expenditure. Extremely long nanofibers can be manufactured by electrospinning: in both cases the materials obtained have enormous and unprecedented specific surface area, suitable for enhanced performances.

Notwithstanding the technological advances made, the daily life problems faced two centuries ago still afflict the majority of the exceedingly large contemporary world's population. The early research subjects in the areas of personal care, food production and preservation, innovative agriculture, plant protection, fishing activities and related issues are still pivotal for envisaging sustainable green solutions with the aid of polysaccharides.

Riccardo A. A. MuzzarelliEmeritus Professor of EnzymologyUniversity of Ancona, Italy

Preface

This book is a succinct and in-depth account of the progress and evolution of specific scientific concepts that fall under the umbrella of polysaccharide-based renewable biomaterials. Our aspiration is that the book will provide a panoramic snapshot of highly important developments in the field of science and engineering of polysaccharides. These are materials that to a certain extent have not received the attention they merit, especially because they currently occupy an important place in the emerging biomaterials and bioenergy disciplines.

A fundamental overview and treatment of important recent advances in cellulosic chemistry will comprise the basis for the first three chapters. These chapters will provide an in-depth account of the importance of cellulose, its wonderfully adaptable chemistry for providing a myriad of by-products, and ultimately explore two of these by-products, namely aerocellulose and nanocellulose.

The panoply of polysaccharide materials for research applications is not just limited to cellulosics but also includes chitin. The following five chapters are among the most thorough and written by several of the most involved researchers in the arena of chitin/chitosan. Chitin may be one of the most abundant polysaccharides in the biosphere today, but only recently have we begun to realize its potential as a valuable biomaterial especially in structural and functional nanocomposite applications, as well as in biomedical applications including bioadhesives/hemostatics. We have two entire chapters devoted to exploring the role of chitin and chitosan as unique building blocks for a number of highly valuable transformations. We then provide a much more in-depth investigation of a few of the many important functions that are mentioned, including the ability of chitosan and its derivatives to provide a potential water remediation role. This represents an altogether novel and highly economic and beneficial function that has very little precedent in the annals of renewable materials bioremediation efforts. In the same vein, we then explore the role of these polysaccharides within the field of nutrition science. Coma overviews the basic constructs that are involved in food preservation and how chitin/chitosan products can elegantly address almost all of the needs in this unique and highly valuable area. Finally, Yamazaki and Hudson will examine one of chitosan's most important and singularly attractive functions, namely that of bioadhesion and hemostasis.

We move on to some unique, very high value functions of polysaccharides in the chapters 9 and 10. In Chapter 9, Rußler and Rosenau explore electrical conductivity aspects of polysaccharides with respect to the necessary modifications that can be pursued to impart electro-active character to this abundant class of materials. In Chapter 10, Shuttleworth et al. explore the emerging area of porous materials with attention to the ability of polysaccharides to deliver new high value functionality in the area of absorption, storage, and delivery.

Chapters 11 and 12 examine starch, which is one of the most scientifically explored and manipulated polysaccharides in the research community. These chapters examine the fundamental properties of starch-based material, why they are so attractive for research applications, their utility now and in the future, and also provide a compilation of highly useful starch-based bionanocomposites, their chemical and physical properties, and the techniques and approaches for their processing.

Finally, the last three chapters explore the kingdom of the heteropolysaccharides (hemicelluloses), a species of polysaccharides that are amorphous in their structural dispersity. They are highly available and abundant biomaterials as are cellulose, chitin, and starch, but again they suffer from a relative paucity of advanced applications within the biomaterials community. The chapters will examine xylans, one of the most abundant hemicelluloses in the biosphere, which are well represented within angiosperms. Xylans and other related and nonxylan-based hemicellulosics are treated not only in terms of their structural aspects, properties, uses as viable starting material resources but also as highly functional precursors for advanced nanotechnological and other applications.

Our sincere hope is that the work represented herein serves as a useful and functional platform for practitioners in the art and for researchers who intend to explore the extraordinary “plasticity” and adaptability of polysaccharides. Henry Ford, the great U.S. Industrialist, once said, “An idealist is a person who helps other people to be prosperous.” The editors of this book and all those associated with it from the publishers to the authors may be classified as idealists whose sincere hope and trust is that the collection of knowledge contained herein will serve to make our readers prosperous. We believe that the polysaccharide materials that nature offers us provide us with that possibility—it is our sacred duty, all of us, therefore, to explore and exploit these remarkable materials for the betterment of humankind.

Youssef Habibi

Lucian A. Lucia

Contributors

Luc Avérous, LIPHT-ECPM, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex 2, France

James H. Clark, Green Chemistry Centre of Excellence, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, UK

Véronique Coma, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, LCPO, UMR 5629, F-33600 Pessac, France

Anna Ebringerova, Institute of Chemistry, Center for Glycomics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

Ram B. Gupta, Chemical Engineering Department, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA

Youssef Habibi, Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

Emmerich Haimer, Departments of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, and Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

Natanya Hansen, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

Thomas Heinze, Center of Excellence for Polysaccharide Research, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany; Finnish Distinguished Professor at Åbo Akademi/University, Åbo, Finland

Samuel M. Hudson, Fiber and Polymer Science Program, College of Textiles, Centennial Campus, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

Falk Liebner, Department of Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

José F. Louvier-Hernández, Chemical Engineering Department, Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Celaya, Guanajuato, México

Lucian A. Lucia, Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

Avtar Matharu, Green Chemistry Centre of Excellence, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, UK

Aji P. Mathew, Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Division of Wood and Bionanocomposites, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden

Kristiina Oksman, Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Division of Wood and Bionanocomposites, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden

Katrin Petzold-Welcke, Center of Excellence for Polysaccharide Research, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany

David Plackett, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

Visakh P. M., Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Division of Wood and Bionanocomposites, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden; Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India

Antje Potthast, Department of Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

Mohammed Rhazi, Laboratory of Natural Macromolecules, E. N. S., Marrakech, Morocco

Thomas Rosenau, Department of Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

Axel Rußler, Department of Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

Peter S. Shuttleworth, Green Chemistry Centre of Excellence, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, UK

Sabu Thomas, Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India

Abdelouhad Tolaimate, Laboratory of Natural Macromolecules, E. N. S., Marrakech, Morocco

Mai Yamazaki, Fiber and Polymer Science Program, College of Textiles, Centennial Campus, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

Chapter 1

Recent Advances in Cellulose Chemistry

Thomas Heinze and Katrin Petzold-Welcke

1.1 Introduction

The chemical modification of polysaccharides is still underestimated regarding the structure and hence property design of materials based on renewable resources. At present, the cellulose derivatives commercially produced in large scale are limited to some ester with C2–C4 carboxylic acids, including mixed esters and phthalic acid half-esters as well as ethers with methyl-, hydroxyalkyl-, and carboxymethyl functions. In general, organic chemistry of cellulose opens a wide variety of products by esterification and etherification. In addition, novel products may be obtained by nucleophilic displacement reactions, unconventional chemistry like “click reactions,” introduction of dendrons in the cellulose structure, and regiocontrolled reactions within the repeating units and along the polymer chains. The aim of this chapter is to highlight selected recent advances in chemical modification of cellulose for the synthesis of new products with promising properties as well as alternative synthesis paths in particular under homogeneous conditions, that is, starting with dissolved polymer considering own research results adequately.

1.2 Technical Important Cellulosics

The application of the glucane cellulose as a precursor for chemical modifications was exploited extensively even before its polymeric nature was determined and well understood. Cellulose nitrate (commonly misnomered nitrocellulose) of higher nitrogen content was one of the most important explosives. Its partially nitrated ester was among the first polymeric materials used as a “plastic” well known under the trade name of Celluloid. Today, cellulose nitrate is the only inorganic cellulose ester of commercial interest (Balser et al., 1986). Further cellulose products like methyl-, ethyl-, or hydroxyalkyl ethers or cellulose acetate, and, in addition, products with combinations of various functional groups, for example, ethylhydroxyethyl and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, cellulose acetopropionates, and acetobutyrates are still important, many decades after their discovery. Ionic cellulose derivatives are also known since a long time. Carboxymethyl cellulose, up to now the most important ionic cellulose ether, was first prepared in 1918 and produced commercially in the early 1920s in Germany (Brandt, 1986). Various cellulose derivatives are produced in large quantities for diversified applications. Their properties are primarily determined by the type of functional group. Moreover, they are influenced significantly by adjusting the degree of functionalization and the degree of polymerization (DP) of the polymer backbone (Table 1.1).

Table 1.1 Examples of Important Cellulose Esters and Ethers Commercially Produced.

1.3 Nucleophilic Displacement Reactions (SN)

It is well known from the chemistry of low molecular alcohols that hydroxyl functions are converted to a good leaving group for nucleophilic displacement reactions by the formation of the corresponding sulfonic acid esters (Heinze et al., 2006a). Moreover, cellulose derivatives obtained by SN reactions are suitable starting materials for the preparation of novel products by unconventional chemistry like “click reactions.” Even selectively dendronized celluloses could be prepared.

1.3.1 Cellulose Sulfonates

Typical structures of sulfonic acid esters used in polysaccharide chemistry are shown in Figure 1.1. The synthesis of sulfonic acid esters is realized heterogeneously by reaction of cellulose with sulfonic acid chlorides in aqueous alkaline media (NaOH, Schotten–Baumann reaction), or is most efficiently completely homogeneous in a solvent like N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA)/LiCl. The main drawback of heterogeneous procedures is a variety of side reactions, including undesired nucleophilic displacement reactions caused especially by long reaction times and high temperatures required. In contrast, the homogeneous process using cellulose dissolved in DMA/LiCl yields well soluble sulfonic acid esters (McCormick and Callais, 1987).

Figure 1.1 Typical sulfonic acid esters of cellulose.

The p-toluenesulfonic (tosyl) and the methanesulfonic (mesyl) acid esters of cellulose are the most widely used sulfonic acid esters, due to their availability and hydrolytic stability (Heinze et al., 2006a). The homogeneous reaction of cellulose in DMA/LiCl with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride permits the preparation of cellulose tosylate with defined degree of substitution (DS) easily controlled by the molar ratio reagent to anhydroglucose unit (AGU) with almost no side reactions (McCormick and Callais, 1986, 1987; Rahn et al., 1996; Siegmund and Klemm, 2002). The structure of the product may depend on both the reaction conditions and the workup procedure used (McCormick et al., 1990). The tosyl chloride may react with DMA in a Vilsmeier–Haak-type reaction forming the O-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-N,N-dimethylacetiminium salt, which attacks the OH groups of the cellulose depending on the reaction conditions used. For a higher efficiency of tosylation of cellulose, stronger bases such as triethylamine (pKa 10.65) or 4-(dimethylamino)-pyridine (pKa 9.70) are necessary, which react with the O-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-N,N-dimethylacetiminium salt building a quaternary ammonium salt and hence lead to the formation of tosyl cellulose without undesired side reactions (Figure 1.2) (McCormick et al., 1990). On the contrary, the use of a weak organic base like pyridine (pKa 5.25) or N,N-dimethylaniline (pKa 5.15) for the reaction with cellulose yields a reactive N,N-dimethylacetiminium salt, which may form chlorodeoxy celluloses at high temperatures or cellulose acetate after aqueous workup (Heinze et al., 2006a).

Figure 1.2 Mechanism of the reaction of cellulose with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride in DMA/LiCl in the presence of triethylamine. Adapted from McCormick et al. (1990).

Various cellulose materials with degree of polymerization in the range of 280–1020 were transformed to the corresponding tosyl esters (Rahn et al., 1996). DS values in the range of 0.4–2.3 with negligible incorporation of chlorodeoxy groups were obtained at reaction temperatures of 8–10°C for 5–24 h (Table 1.2).

Table 1.2 Results and Conditions of the Reaction of Cellulose with p-Toluenesulfonyl Chloride (TosCl) in DMA/LiCl Applying Triethylamine as Base (2 mol/mol TosCl) for 24 h at 8°C.

Cellulose tosylates are soluble in various organic solvents; beginning at DS of 0.4, solubility in aprotic dipolar solvents like DMA, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) occurs. The cellulose tosylates become soluble in acetone and dioxane at a DS value of 1.4 and solubility in chloroform and methylene chloride appears at DS of 1.8. Position 6 reacts faster compared to the secondary OH groups at positions 2 and 3, which can be characterized by means of FTIR and NMR spectroscopy of cellulose tosylate (Rahn et al., 1996).

1.3.2 SN Reactions with Cellulose Sulfonates

Cellulose sulfonates are studied for a broad variety of SN reactions, as discussed in various review papers (Belyakova et al., 1971; Hon, 1996; Siegmund and Klemm, 2002). Usually the SN reaction occurs selectively at the primary sulfonates. The mechanism (SN1 versus SN2) of nucleophilic substitution reaction of cellulose derivatives is still a subject of discussion. A remarkable finding is that a treatment of partially substituted cellulose tosylates (DS 1.2–1.5) with strong nucleophiles like azide or fluoride ions leads to a substitution of both primary and secondary tosylates (Siegmund and Klemm, 2002; Koschella and Heinze, 2003).

Water-soluble 6-deoxy-6-S-thiosulfato celluloses (Table 1.3) form S–S bridges by oxidation with H2O2—in analogy to nonpolymeric compounds of this type (Milligan and Swan, 1962)—leading to waterborne coatings (Klemm, 1998).

Table 1.3 Examples of Products Yielded by Nucleophilic Displacement Reactions of Cellulose Tosylate.

ReagentProductReferencesNa2S2O36-Deoxy-6-S-thiosulfato celluloseKlemm (1998)NaSCH3 (subsequent carboxymethylation)6-Deoxy-6-thiomethyl-2,3-di-carboxymethyl celluloseWenz et al. (2005)NaSO3Sodium deoxysulfate-co-tosylate celluloseArai and Aoki (1994); Arai and Yoda (1998)Iminodiacetic acid6-Deoxy-6-iminodiacetic acid cellulose sodium saltHeinze (1998)Triethylamine6-Deoxy-6-triethylammonium celluloseKoschella and Heinze (2001)N,N-Dimethyl-1,3-diaminopropane6-Deoxy-6-(N,N-dimethyl-3-aminopropyl)ammonium celluloseKoschella and Heinze (2001)2,4,6-Tris(N,N-dimethylaminomethyl)phenol6-Deoxy-6-(2,6-di(N,N-dimethylaminomethyl)phenol-4-methyl-N,N-dimethylamino celluloseKoschella and Heinze (2001)R(+)-, S(−)-, and racemic 1-phenylethylamine6-Deoxy-6-(1-phenylethyl)amino celluloseHeinze et al. (2001)Aminomethane6-Deoxy-6-methylamino celluloseKnaus et al. (2003)

Water-soluble 6-deoxy-6-thiomethyl-2,3-carboxymethyl cellulose forms self-assembled monolayers at a gold surface (Wenz et al., 2005). The insoluble products yielded by SN reactions of cellulose tosylate with iminoacetic acid have high water retention values of up to 11,000% (Heinze, 1998). A number of aminodeoxy celluloses are accessible. The nucleophilic displacement reaction with various amines results in water-soluble 6-deoxy-6-trialkylammonium cellulose (Koschella and Heinze, 2001). The initial chirality of the cellulose has no significant influence on its reactivity with the two enantiomeric amines by the SN reaction of cellulose tosylate with R(+)-, S(−)- and racemic 1-phenylethylamine (Heinze et al., 2001). Methylamino celluloses are suitable as hydrophilic polymer matrices for immobilization of ligands for extracorporeal blood purification, for example, quaternary ammonium groups (Knaus et al., 2003). Conversion of cellulose tosylate with diamines or oligoamines yields polymers of the type P-CH2-NH-(X)-NH2 (P = cellulose, (X) = alkylene, aryl, aralkylene, or oligoamine) at position 6 and solubilizing groups at positions 2 and 3, which form transparent films that may be applied for the immobilization of enzymes like glucose oxidase (GOD), peroxidase, and lactate oxidase (Figure 1.3). The products are useful as biosensors (Tiller et al., 1999, 2000; Berlin et al., 2000, 2003; Becher et al., 2004).

Figure 1.3 Reaction path for the synthesis of 6-deoxy-6-amino cellulose ester derivatives by subsequent acylation and nucleophilic displacement with phenylenediamine of tosyl cellulose. Adapted from Tiller et al. (2000).

Water-soluble and film-forming amino cellulose tosylates from alkylenediamines can be used as enzyme support matrices with Cu2+ chelating properties (Jung and Berlin, 2005). The synthesis of 6-deoxy-6-amino cellulose via azido derivative is described in detail (Figure 1.4). The reaction conditions for a complete functionalization at position 6 are optimized, as well as various subsequent reactions of the product are studied (e.g., N-carboxymethylation, N-sulfonation) (Liu and Baumann, 2002; Heinze et al., 2006b).

Figure 1.4 Scheme of the synthesis of 6-deoxy-6-amino cellulose via cellulose tosylate and reduction of 6-deoxy-6-azido cellulose.

1.3.2.1 Huisgen Reaction: “Click Chemistry” with Cellulose

Recently, Sharpless introduced click chemistry, that is, a modular approach that uses only the most practical and reliable transformation, which are experimentally simple, needing no protection from oxygen, requiring only stoichiometric amounts of starting materials, and generating no by-products (Kolb et al., 2001). The 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of an azide moiety and a triple bond (Huisgen reaction) is the most popular click reaction to date (Rostovtsev et al., 2002; Lewis et al., 2002). Sharpless describes the Huisgen reaction as “the cream of the crop” of click chemistry. The path of tosylation, SN with sodium azide and subsequent copper-catalyzed Huisgen reaction, has significantly broaden the structural diversity of polysaccharide derivatives because the method yields products that are not accessible via etherification and esterification, the most commonly applied reactions (Liebert et al., 2006). The preparation of 6-deoxy-6-azido cellulose and subsequent copper-catalyzed Huisgen reaction of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazols formed as linker lead to novel cellulose derivatives with methylcarboxylate, 2-aniline, and 3-thiophene moieties (Figure 1.5). No side reactions occur, the synthesis leads to pure and well-soluble derivatives with conversion efficiency of the azido moiety of 75–98% depending on the reaction temperature and the molar ratio (Table 1.4).

Figure 1.5 Reaction path for the preparation of 6-deoxy-6-azido cellulose and subsequent copper-catalyzed Huisgen reaction of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazols used as linker for the modification of cellulose with methylcarboxylate, 2-aniline, and 3-thiophene moieties.

Table 1.4 Conditions of the Copper-Catalyzed Huisgen Reaction of 6-Deoxy-6-Azido Cellulose (Azido Cellulose) and Degree of Substitution (DS) of the Products.

As can be concluded from the NMR spectra exemplified for the spectrum of 6-deoxy-6-methylcarboxytriazolo celluloses (DS 0.81) acquired in DMSO, no structure impurities are present (Figure 1.6). The signals at 48.5 ppm represent the methyl ester, and at 160.6 ppm the signals of the carbonyl group appear. The C-atoms of the triazole moieties give signals at 138.6 and 129.9 ppm, and peaks in the range of 51.6–110 ppm are related to the carbons of the repeating unit. A weak signal at about 60 ppm reveals the existence of remaining OH groups at position 6.

Figure 1.6 NMR spectrum of methylcarboxytriazolo celluloses (DS 0.81) in DMSO-d6. Reproduced with permission from Wiley–VCH, Liebert et al. (2006).

The 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of 6-azido-6-deoxycellulose with acetylenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester and subsequent saponification with aqueous NaOH yield bifunctional cellulose-based polyelectrolytes (Figure 1.7) (Koschella et al., 2010).

Figure 1.7 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of 6-azido-6-deoxycellulose with acetylenecarboxylic acid dimethyl ester.

Up to 62% of the azide moieties are converted. Starting with a 6-azido-6-deoxy cellulose with a DS of 0.84, the reaction is completed within 4 h using 2 mol of acetylenecarboxylic acid dimethyl ester per mole modified AGU to get 6-deoxy-6-(1-triazolo-4,5-disodiumcarboxylate) cellulose with a DS up to 0.52. The products form water-insoluble complexes with multivalent metal ions and organic polycations that may possess different shapes; metal salts like calcium(II) chloride or aluminum(III) chloride yield a bagel-like shape. The polyelectrolyte complex with poly(diallyldimethylammonium) chloride is very smooth and unstable “tubes” are formed (Figure 1.8).

Figure 1.8 Ionotropic gels of 6-deoxy-6(1-triazolo-4,5-disodiumcarboxylate) cellulose (DS 0.51) with aqueous calcium chloride (5 w/v), aqueous aluminum(III) chloride (5% w/v), and poly(diallyldimethylammonium) chloride (1% w/v). Reproduced with permission from Elsevier, Koschella et al. (2010).

A promising approach for the synthesis of unconventional cellulose products is the introduction of dendrons in the cellulose backbone, which are easily accessible through the convergent synthesis of dendrimers (Vögtle et al., 2007). Apart from the first described amino triester-based dendrons (Behera's amine) with an isocyanate moiety (Hassan et al., 2004, 2005), carboxylic acid-containing dendrons (Heinze et al., 2007; Pohl et al. 2008a) are explored, which are allowed to react with cellulose or cellulose derivatives like ethyl cellulose (Khan et al., 2007), hydroxypropyl cellulose (Oestmark et al., 2007), or carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (Zhang and Daly, 2005, 2006; Zhang et al., 2006a). Regioselective introduction of dendrons in cellulose is achieved by the reaction of 6-deoxy-6-azido cellulose with propargyl-polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendron homogeneously in DMSO or heterogeneously in methanol in the presence of CuSO4·5H2O/sodium ascorbate (Figure 1.9, Table 1.5) (Pohl et al., 2008b). Even ionic liquids (ILs) like 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (EMImAc) could successfully be applied as reaction medium due to the solubility of 6-deoxy-6-azido cellulose (Figure 1.9, Table 1.5) (Heinze et al., 2008a; Schöbitz et al., 2009).

Figure 1.9 Reaction path for the conversion of cellulose with propargyl-PAMAM dendron of first generation via tosylation, nucleophilic displacement by azide, and conversion with the dendron.

Table 1.5 Degree of Substitution (DS) of Dendritic PAMAM-Triazolo Cellulose Derivatives of First (1), Second (2), and Third (3) Generations Synthesized Homogeneously in Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) or 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Acetate (EMImAc) as well as Heterogeneously in Methanol by Reacting 6-Deoxy-6-Azido Cellulose (DS 0.75) with Propargyl Polyamidoamine Dendrons of First, Second, and Third Generations via Copper-Catalyzed (CuSO2·5H2O/Sodium Ascorbate) Huisgen Reaction.

Under homogeneous conditions, 6-deoxy-6-azido cellulose reacts with propargyl-PAMAM dendrons of first to third generation. The structure characterization of the dendritic PAMAM-triazolo celluloses succeeded by FTIR and NMR spectroscopy, including two-dimensional techniques. The HSQC-DEPT NMR spectrum of second-generation PAMAM-triazolo celluloses (DS 0.59) allows the complete assignment of the signals of the protons of the substituent in NMR spectra (Figure 1.10).

Figure 1.10 HSQC-DEPT NMR spectrum of second-generation PAMAM-triazolo celluloses (DS 0.59). Adapted from Pohl et al. (2008b).

In Figure 1.11, a comparison of NMR spectra of first-, second-, and third-generation PAMAM-triazolo celluloses synthesized in EMImAc demonstrate the possibility to assign the signals of the dendrons and the AGU. However, the intensity of the peaks of the carbon atoms of the repeating unit decreases due to the large number of branches and corresponding carbon atoms.

Figure 1.11 NMR spectra of A first (DS 0.60), B second (DS 0.48), and C third (DS 0.28) generation PAMAM-triazolo celluloses in DMSO-d6 at 60°C.). Reproduced with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Heinze et al. (2008a).

Water-soluble deoxy-azido cellulose derivatives could be obtained by heterogeneous carboxymethylation applying 2-propanol/aqueous NaOH as medium. Starting from the cellulose derivatives with different DS values of the azide moiety (0.58–1.01), various DS values of the carboxymethyl functions (1.01–1.35) could be realized (Pohl, 2009a). The carboxymethyl deoxy-azido cellulose provides a convenient starting material for the selective dendronization of cellulose via Huisgen reaction yielding water-soluble carboxymethyl 6-deoxy-(1-N-(1,2,3-triazolo)-4-PAMAM) cellulose derivatives of first (DS 0.51) (Figure 1.12), second (DS 0.44), and third generation (DS 0.39).

Figure 1.12 Homogeneous conversion of carboxymethyl 6-deoxy-6-azidocellulose (DSAzide 0.81, DSCM 1.25) with first generation of propargyl-polyamidoamine dendron via the copper-catalyzed Huisgen reaction.

The conformation and the flexibility of the dissolved polymer are estimated qualitatively using conformation zoning and quantitatively using the combined global method. Sedimentation conformation zoning shows a semiflexible coil conformation and the global method yields persistence length in the range of 2.8–4.0 nm with no evidence of any change in flexibility after dendronization (Table 1.6).

Table 1.6 Conformational Parameters for Carboxymethyl Deoxy-Azido Cellulose and Dendronized Carboxymethyl 6-Deoxy-(1-N-(1,2,3-Triazolo)-4-PAMAM) Celluloses.

6-Deoxy-(1-N-(1,2,3-triazolo)-4-PAMAM) cellulose of the 2.5th generation (DS 0.25) is a promising starting polymer for biofunctional surfaces (Pohl et al., 2009b), either by embedding the dendronized cellulose in cellulose acetate (DS 2.5) matrix or by modifying the deoxy-azido cellulose film heterogeneously with the dendron (Figure 1.13). The heterogeneously functionalized cellulose solid support provides the higher amount of amino groups (determined by acid orange 7). The enzyme immobilization on the dendronized cellulose films after activation with glutardialdehyde is demonstrated using glucose oxidase (GOD) as a model enzyme. The specific enzyme activity of immobilized GOD (28.73 mU/cm2) and the coupling efficiency (2.2%) are rather small compared to the blend of dendronized cellulose and cellulose acetate (135.16 mU/cm2, 27.2%). Nevertheless, the heterogeneous approach of dendronization with propargyl-polyamidoamine dendron of 2.5th generation affords an interesting possibility for biofunctionalized surfaces and thus protein attachment.

Figure 1.13 Scheme preparation of biofunctional surfaces. (a) Blend of 6-deoxy-6-(1,2,3-triazolo)-4-polyamidoamine cellulose (DS 0.25) and cellulose acetate (DS 2.50). (b) Heterogeneous functionalization of deoxy-azido cellulose film with propargyl-polyamidoamine dendron of 2.5th generation via copper-catalyzed Huisgen reaction and for both subsequent surface activation with glutardialdehyde for covalent immobilization of glucose oxidase. Adapted from Pohl et al. (2009b).

Chemoselective synthesis of dendronized cellulose may be realized with regioselectively functionalized propargyl cellulose at position 6 (Pohl and Heinze, 2008) or at position 3 (Fenn et al., 2009) (see Section 1.5.3). By nucleophilic displacement reaction of 6-O-tosyl cellulose (DS 0.58) with propargyl amine, 6-deoxy-6-aminopropargyl cellulose is formed that provides an excellent starting material for the dendronization of cellulose via the copper-catalyzed Huisgen reaction yielding 6-deoxy-6-amino-(4-methyl-(1,2,3-triazolo)-1-propyl-polyamido amine) cellulose derivatives of first (DS 0.33) and second (DS 0.25) generation (Figure 1.14).

Figure 1.14 Reaction path for the synthesis of 6-deoxy-6-amino-(4-methyl-(1,2,3-triazolo)-1-propyl-polyamido amine) cellulose derivatives of first generation (DS 0.33) via 6-deoxy-6-aminopropargyl cellulose. Adapted from Pohl and Heinze (2008).

3-Mono-O-propargyl cellulose could be synthesized by treatment of 2,6-di-O-thexyldimethylsilyl (TDS) cellulose with propargyl bromide in the presence of sodium hydride and the subsequent complete removal of the silicon-containing group of the 3-mono-O-propargyl-2,6-di-O-thexyldimethylsilyl cellulose with tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (see Section 5.3). Copper-catalyzed Huisgen reaction with azido-propyl-polyamidoamine dendron of first and second generation leads to regioselectively functionalized 3-O-(4-methyl-1-N-propyl-polyamidoamine-(1,2,3-triazole)) cellulose (Figure 1.15) (Fenn et al., 2009).

Figure 1.15 Reaction scheme for the synthesis of 3-O-(4-methyl-1-N-propyl-polyamidoamine-(1,2,3-triazole)) cellulose of first generation via 3-O-propargyl cellulose. Adapted from Fenn et al. (2009).

1.4 Sulfation of Cellulose

Polysaccharide sulfuric acid half-esters are often referred to as polysaccharide sulfates (PSS), constituting a complex class of compounds occurring in living organisms. They possess a variety of biological functions, for example, inhibition of blood coagulation, or may be present as component of connective tissues (Fransson, 1985). These polysaccharides are usually composed of different sugars, including aminodeoxy and carboxy groups containing derivatives, for example, β-D-glucuronic acid, α-L-iduronic acid, and N-acetyl-β-D-galactosamine (Nakano et al., 2002). Heparan sulfate, chondroitin-6-sulfate, and dermatan sulfate are among the most important naturally occurring PSS (Figure 1.16).

Figure 1.16 Typical repeating units of heparan sulfate (a), chondroitin-6-sulfate (b), and dermatan sulfate (c).

Promising biological properties are not only observed for naturally occurring PSS but also for semisynthetic ones that can be received by introduction of sulfate groups into the polymer backbone of polysaccharides such as cellulose, dextran, pullulan, or chitosan. They have a number of advantages over their natural occurring counterparts. The isolation of the naturally occurring PSS often requires high cost due to intensive enrichment, extraction, and purification procedures, while homopolysaccharides suitable for sulfation are often easily available by biotechnological processes (dextran, pullulan) or even by industrial scale production (cellulose, xylan, and chitosan). On one hand, natural PSS constitute of very complex structures making it difficult to elucidate structure–property correlations, while on the other hand, ease of chemical modification of polysaccharides in combination with modern structure characterization methods offers a broad structural diversity of semisynthetic PSS with well-defined chemical structures. These products can mimic the structure and biological activity of naturally occurring PSS and are intensively studied regarding their applications in various fields especially in biotechnology and medicine.

Many procedures for the preparation of cellulose sulfates (CS) have been developed (Figure 1.17). The properties of CS, like water solubility, superstructure formation, and biological activity, strongly depend on the DS, on the molecular weight, and on the distribution of substituents within the repeating unit and along the polymer chain, which are ascertained by the course of reaction. The influence of the pattern of substitution on the properties is especially distinct at very low DS values.

Figure 1.17 Overview of different approaches for the preparation of cellulose sulfate under heterogeneous (light gray), quasi-homogeneous (medium gray), and homogeneous (dark gray) conditions. I: heterogeneous sulfation with propanol/H2SO4; II: sulfation in DMF or pyridine under heterogeneous starting conditions; IIIa: parallel acetylation and sulfation of cellulose; IIIb: sulfation of cellulose acetate; IV: sulfation of trimethylsilyl cellulose; Va: dissolution of cellulose in N2O4/DMF; Vb: sulfation of cellulose trinitrite in N2O4/DMF solution; and VI: direct sulfation in ionic liquids.

Complete heterogeneous sulfation of cellulose is carried out with mixtures of H2SO4 and propanol (Yao, 2000; Lukanoff and Dautzenberg, 1994). The course of the reaction is largely committed by the equilibrium formation of propylsulfuric acid. Cooling to about −10°C is necessary in order to limit acid-catalyzed chain cleavage. The CSs yielded are not uniformly substituted and contain large amounts of water-insoluble parts without previous activation of the cellulose. An increase of the DS due to increasing reaction time, temperature, and amounts of H2SO4 is in general not only combined with a decrease of insoluble parts but also with considerable polymer degradation and hence lower solution viscosities of the aqueous solutions of the products (Figure 1.18) (Lukanoff and Dautzenberg, 1994).

Figure 1.18 Correlation of DS value, viscosity, and amount of water-soluble part of cellulose sulfates obtained by heterogeneous sulfation of cellulose using propanol/H2SO4 mixtures. Adapted from Lukanoff and Dautzenberg (1994), and with permission from Nova Science Publishers, Heinze et al. (2010a).

Sulfation of cellulose suspended in DMF with a SO3 complex starts under heterogeneous conditions and leads to the dissolution of the CS formed at a certain DS. This method is suitable for the preparation of CS with high DS > 1.5 only. Lower substituted derivatives are sulfated in the swollen amorphous parts of the cellulose, while the crystalline parts remain unfunctionalized. Thus, water insolubility and nonuniform sulfation among the cellulose chains, that is, different amounts of water-soluble parts (high DS) and water-insoluble parts (low DS) are formed (Schweiger, 1972).

Sulfation of cellulose derivatives, in particular cellulose acetate, cellulose nitrite, and trimethylsilyl cellulose (TMSC), and subsequent cleavage of the initial functional group are a valuable quasi-homogeneous route for the CS preparation. The major drawbacks are the requirement of large amounts of chemicals and the additional effort necessary for both the reaction and purification processes.

In this context, N2O4/DMF was intensively studied as derivatizing cellulose solvent for the preparation of CS, although it is very hazardous. The intermediately formed cellulose nitrite is attacked by various reagents (SO3, ClSO3H, SO2Cl2, and H2NSO3H), resulting in CSs via transesterification with DS values ranging from 0.3 to 1.6 after cleavage of the residual nitrite moieties during the workup procedure under protic conditions (Schweiger, 1974; Wagenknecht et al., 1993). The regioselectivity of the transesterification reaction can be controlled by reaction conditions used (Table 1.7). The polymer degradation is rather low-yielding products that form high-viscous solutions. Besides their promising properties, the application of CS prepared in N2O4/DMF, especially for biomedical application, is limited due to the high toxicity of the solvent and the by-products formed (nitrosamines).

Table 1.7 Regioselectivity of Sulfation of Cellulose Nitrite with Different Reagents (2 mol/mol AGU) Depending on the Reaction Conditions.

In order to avoid the toxic N2O4/DMF solvent, TMS cellulose was used, which is soluble in various organic solvents, for example, DMF and tetrahydrofuran (THF), that readily reacts with SO3–pyridine or SO3–DMF complex (Wagenknecht et al., 1992). The synthesis of TMS cellulose is quite easy and can be achieved by homogeneous reaction of cellulose in DMA/LiCl and ionic liquids with hexamethyldisilazane or heterogeneously in DMF/NH3 with trimethylchlorosilane (DS < 1.5) (Köhler et al., 2008; Mormann and Demeter, 1999; Heinze, 1998).

Similar to the sulfation of cellulose nitrite, the TMS group acts as leaving group. The first step consists of an insertion of SO3 into the Si−O bond of the silyl ether (Figure 1.19). The instable intermediate formed is usually not isolated. Subsequent workup with aqueous NaOH results in a cleavage of the TMS group under formation of CS (Richter and Klemm, 2003).

Figure 1.19 Synthesis of cellulose sulfate via trimethylsilyl cellulose (upper scheme) and starting from cellulose acetate (lower scheme).

It is described that due to the course of reaction, the DSSulfate is limited by the DSTMS of the starting TMS cellulose and can be adjusted in the range of 0.2–2.5. Typical reaction conditions and DS values are summarized in Table 1.8. The sulfation reaction is fast and takes about 3 h with negligible depolymerization. Thus, products of high molar mass are accessible if TMS cellulose of high DP was applied as starting material. For instance, the specific viscosity of a CS with DS 0.60 is 4900 (1% in H2O) (Wagenknecht et al., 1992).

Table 1.8 Sulfation of Cellulose via TMS Cellulose.

The sulfation could be carried out in a one-pot reaction, that is, without isolation and redissolution of the TMS cellulose (Wagenknecht et al., 1992). After silylation of cellulose in DMF/NH3, the excess of NH3 is removed under vacuum followed by separation of the NH4Cl formed. The sulfating agent, for example, SO3 or ClSO3H, dissolved in DMF is added and the CS is formed.

Carboxylic acid esters of cellulose, in particular commercially available cellulose acetate with DS 2.5 as well as cellulose formiate both dissolved in DMF, are useful intermediates for the preparation of CS (Philipp et al., 1990). In case of cellulose formiate, the DSSulfate can be higher than the amount of remaining OH groups partly because of the displacement of formiate moieties by sulfate groups. In contrast, no transesterification appears during sulfation of cellulose acetate. The acetyl groups act as protecting group and the sulfation with SO3–pyridine, SO3–DMF complex, or acetylsulfuric acid proceeds exclusively at the remaining hydroxyl functions (Figure 1.19). The cellulose acetosulfate formed is neutralized with sodium acetate and subsequently treated with NaOH in ethanol to cleave the acetate moieties in an inert atmosphere within 16 h at room temperature (RT).

Regioselective deacetylation of cellulose acetate at position 2 is achieved by treating the starting polymer (DS 2.5) with amines of low basicity, such as hexamethylene diamine, together with certain amounts of water at 80°C (Wagenknecht, 1996). Thus, CS with preferred sulfation at position 2 could be isolated (Table 1.9).

Table 1.9 Partial DS Values of Cellulose Sulfate obtained by Conversion Position 2 and 3 of partly in 1 Deacetylated Cellulose Acetate with NH2SO3H in DMF (80°C, 2 h)

Acetosulfation, that is, competitive esterification of cellulose suspended in DMF, DMA, or N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) with a mixture of acetic anhydride and SO3 or ClSO3H, is another route toward CS with distinct sulfation at position 6 (Hettrich et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2009, 2010a, 2010b). The synthesis involves the formation of a mixed cellulose acetosulfate combined with dissolution of the polysaccharide derivative in the dipolar aprotic solvent. Acetylating agent up to 6–11 mol and sulfating agent up to 3 mol are needed to yield CS with DSsulfate up to about 2. As a result of this quasi-homogeneous reaction, water solubility of CS is achieved at rather low DS > 0.3. In addition, high solution viscosities can be observed when celluloses with high DP such as cotton linters are used.

Homogeneous sulfation of dissolved cellulose can also overcome the problem of irregular substituent distribution. Although widely used for the esterification of cellulose with carboxylic acids, DMA/LiCl is not the solvent of choice for sulfation, because insoluble products of low DS are obtained due to gel formation by addition of the sulfating agent (Klemm et al., 1998a). Several other cellulose solvents including N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMNO) have also been investigated for the homogeneous sulfation of cellulose, but showed coagulation of the reaction medium yielding badly soluble CS (Wagenknecht et al., 1985).

Promising solvents for the sulfation of cellulose are ionic liquids. This group of salt-like compounds with melting points below 100°C turned out to be excellent media for shaping and functionalization of cellulose (Swatloski et al., 2002; El Seoud et al., 2007). Cellulose dissolved in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (BMIMCl)/cosolvent mixtures can be easily transformed into CS by using SO3–pyridine and SO3–DMF complex or ClSO3H (Gericke et al., 2009a). Highly substituted CSs are described for sulfation in BMIMCl at 30°C (Wang et al., 2009), but it has to be noted that cellulose/IL solutions slowly turned solid upon cooling to room temperature depending on cellulose and moisture content. Furthermore, they have rather high solution viscosities, which make it very difficult to ensure sufficient miscibility and to guarantee even accessibility of the sulfating agent to the cellulose backbone. Consequently, the synthesis of CS with a uniform distribution of sulfate groups along the polymer chains demanded a dipolar aprotic cosolvent that drastically reduces the solution viscosity (Gericke et al., 2009a). The reactivity of the sulfating agent is not influenced by the cosolvent. At a molar ratio of 2 mol SO3–DMF complex per mole AGU, the sulfation of microcrystalline cellulose in BMIMCl and BMIMCl/DMF mixtures yields CS with comparable DS values of about 0.9. While the CS synthesized without cosolvent shows water insolubility, the other one readily dissolves in water (Gericke et al., 2009a). On one hand, the increase of temperature results in a considerable decrease of the viscosity of cellulose/IL solutions, which improves solution miscibility (Gericke et al., 2009b), while on the other hand, high temperatures favor the acid-catalyzed chain degradation leading to rather low solution viscosities of aqueous solutions of the resulting CSs of about 2 mPa·s (1%).

The homogeneous sulfation in IL allows tuning of CS properties by simply adjusting the amount of sulfating agent and choosing different types of cellulose (Table 1.10). The reaction proceeds with almost no polymer degradation if conducted at room temperature (Gericke et al., 2009a). This makes the procedure very valuable for the preparation of water-soluble CS over a wide DS range. Especially CS with low DS could be prepared efficiently in IL/cosolvent mixture that is of interest for the bioencapsulation (see pp. 25).

Table 1.10 DS Values and Water Solubility of Cellulose Sulfates Obtained by Sulfation of Spruce Sulfite Pulp Dissolved in BMIMCl/DMF at Different Conditions.

Sulfation of cellulose in BMIMCl/DMF yields a preferred 6-sulfated product. A typical NMR spectrum of CSs with DS 0.48 prepared in BMIMCl/DMF and the assignment of the peaks are shown in Figure 1.20. The signal at 67.3 ppm corresponds to sulfation at position 6. Peaks in the region of 82 ppm that would correspond to sulfated position 2 or 3 are missing in the spectrum and no splitting of the C-1 signal can be observed, which would indicate sulfation at position 2.

Figure 1.20 NMR spectrum (in D2O) of cellulose sulfates (DS = 0.48) obtained by sulfation in BMIMCl/DMF with SO3–DMF. Reproduced with permission from Wiley–VCH, Gericke et al. (2009a).

Disadvantages of IL are their costs and the high viscosities. These drawbacks are compensated by the ease of recycling due to their negligible vapor pressure. Reusability of IL for sulfation has already been reported for BMIMCl leading to similar DS values compared to fresh IL (Gericke et al., 2009a). Furthermore, the use of cosolvents and the development of low viscous task-specific IL, bearing additional functional groups, can lead to further improvement of the homogeneous sulfation of cellulose. It should be noted that IL can act as “noninnocent” solvents that participate in the reaction. For instance, sulfation of cellulose in the room-temperature IL 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate yields cellulose acetate instead of CS (Liebert et al., 2009). Similar side reactions were previously observed for acylation, tritylation, and tosylation of cellulose in EMIMAc (Köhler et al., 2007).

Thus, acetosulfation and homogeneous sulfation in IL are suitable pathways for the preparation of well-soluble, high-molecular weight CS under lab-scale conditions. Commercial application of acetosulfation, however, is limited due to the large amounts of acetylating agent necessary and the inefficient workup.

Besides the bioactivity, sulfates of polysaccharides were investigated toward their ability to form polyelectrolyte complexes (PEC) with various synthetic (Li and Yao, 2009; Renken and Hunkeler, 2007a, 2007b; Zhang et al., 2005, 2006b) and natural polycations (Xie et al., 2009). The process is based on the sequential deposition of interactive polymers from their solutions by electrostatic, van der Waals, and hydrogen bonding, as well as charge transfer interactions (Decher, 1996). These interactions can be applied to create layer-by-layer (LbL) assemblies of functional material surfaces with defined biodegradability or bioactivity (Heinze et al., 2006c).

Microencapsulation of biological material within PEC capsules based on CS has been studied for numerous applications, especially in biotechnology and medicine (Dautzenberg et al., 1999). CSs for bioencapsulation are preferably synthesized via homogeneous sulfation in IL because water-soluble products with high solution viscosities and rather low DS values of 0.3–0.7 are required (Gericke et al., 2009a). CSs of higher DS lead to complexes of low stability (Dautzenberg et al., 1993). Capsular PECs can be achieved with diameters in millimeter till 100 μm scale by dropping a polyanion solution into a polycation precipitation bath, such as poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (polyDADMAC) (Figure 1.21).

Figure 1.21 Scheme of the microencapsulation of biological material in polyelectrolyte complex capsules based on cellulose sulfate and poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (polyDADMAC). Reproduced with permission from Wiley–VCH, Gericke et al. (2009a).

Immobilization of enzymes allows simple recovery and improves their mechanical stability drastically during agitation, which makes this technique very attractive for large-scale biotechnological processes where high durability is required (Hanefeld et al., 2009). After encapsulation within PEC capsules, the velocity of substrate conversion is determined by diffusion through the PEC membrane leading to a decrease of relative enzyme activity. For GOD-containing capsules, they retain 14% of their initial activity after encapsulation within CS-polyDADMAC (Gericke et al., 2009a). Higher capsule stability without further loss of GOD activity is maintained using a more complex four-component system composed of CS, sodium alginate (SA), CaCl2, and the cation poly(methylene-co-guanidine) (PMCG) (Vikartovská et al., 2007). The capsule preparation includes the formation of calcium alginate gel and subsequently polyanion–polycation complexation. Relative activity of GOD-CS-SA-PMCG capsules is 13%. Another elegant two-component approach for enhancing PEC properties applies water-insoluble CS with very low DS values of about 0.15, dissolved in ionic liquid, for the formation of CS–polyDADMAC capsules with increased mechanical stability (Figure 1.22a) (Gericke et al., 2009c). The increase of mechanical stability can be attributed to reestablished hydrogen bonds of the low substituted CS in addition to the electrostatic interaction of polyanion–polycation (Figure 1.22b). Despite the fairly harsh conditions, enzyme entrapment is also realized with IL-based CS/polyDADMAC capsules. The membrane properties, determining matter transfer between the inner core of the PEC capsule and the outer medium, are comparable to common capsules from water-soluble CS, because the same relative activity of 14% of the initial activity is found. Thus, sulfation, in situ PEC formation, and encapsulation in a one-pot procedure may be established. After completed reaction, GOD is suspended in the reaction mixture and GOD–PEC capsules are prepared by dropping the mixture directly into aqueous polyDADMAC, omitting time- and energy-consuming isolation and purification steps.

Figure 1.22 (a) Polyelectrolyte capsules prepared from water-insoluble cellulose sulfate (CS). (b) Scheme of the in situ polyelectrolyte complex formation and enzyme encapsulation using water-insoluble CS and ionic liquids. Reproduced with permission from Nova Science Publishers, Heinze et al. (2010a).

The high biocompatibility and lack of cytotoxicity of CS-polyDADMAC capsules make them ideal candidates for the encapsulation of cells (Pelegrin et al., 1998; Wang et al., 1997). PEC layer is inert to metabolic breakdown, can survive for several months in vivo, and prevents recognition and attack of the protected cells by the immune system (Pelegrin et al., 1998). Thus, xenotransplantation of encapsulated cells may become a powerful therapeutic tool for the treatment of various diseases, including cancer and diabetes. Encapsulation of insulin producing porcine islet cells demonstrates that the CS-polyDADMAC PEC membrane is permeable for vital nutrients as well as oxygen, allowing glucose-dependent cell growth (Schaffelner et al., 2005). Moreover, PEC immobilization is used to protect cells during cryopreservation (Stiegler et al., 2006).

PEC capsules with trigger-controlled release have been studied applying cellulose-producing cells (Fluri et al., 2008). Transgenic mammalian cells, which exhibit doxycycline (DOX)-controlled (1 → 4)-β-glucanase expression, are encapsulated within CS-based PEC capsules. The removal of the inducer molecule DOX suppressing cellulase accumulation enabled time-dependent capsule rupture and discharge of therapeutic proteins (Figure 1.23).

Figure 1.23 Encapsulated (1 → 4)-β-glucanase secreting mammalian cells cultivated in the presence (+DOX) and absence (−DOX) of doxycycline. Control cell line produces no cellulose. Reproduced with permission from Nova Science Publishers, Heinze et al. (2010a).

1.5 Regioselectively Functionalized Cellulose Ether

Etherification is a very important branch of commercial cellulose functionalization. Cellulose ethers are prepared in technical scale by reaction of alkali cellulose with alkylating reagents, for example, epoxides, alkyl-, and carboxymethyl halides (Brandt, 1986; Klemm et al., 1998b). In heterogeneous synthesis, the accessibility of the hydroxyl groups is determined by hydrogen bond-breaking activation and by interaction with the reaction media (Klemm et al., 1998b, 2005). The reaction of cellulose with reagents of low steric demand leads to a random distribution of ether functions within AGU and along the polymer chain provided a sufficient activation is carried out. It is well known that not only DS but also the pattern of substitution may influence the properties of cellulose ethers (Heinze, 2004). To gain detailed information about the influence of the structures on properties of cellulose derivatives, not only a comprehensive structure characterization but also cellulose ethers with a defined distribution of the functional groups (i.e., regioselective functionalization pattern) are indispensable for the establishment of the structure–property relationships. “Regioselectivity” in cellulose chemistry means an exclusive or significant preferential reaction at one or two of the three positions 2, 3, and 6 of AGU as well as along the polymer chain (Figure 1.24).

Figure 1.24 Distribution of the functional groups by regiocontrolled synthesis of cellulose derivatives (a) within the anhydroglucose units and (b) along the polymer chain. With permission from Elsevier, Heinze and Petzold (2008).

Up to now, the most important approach to control the functionalization within the repeating unit is the application of protecting groups (Figure 1.25). Other methods comprising, for example, selective cleavage of primary substituents by chemical or enzymatic treatment play a minor role (Deus et al., 1991; Wagenknecht, 1996; Altaner et al., 2003). Examples are the deacetylation of cellulose acetate under aqueous acidic or alkaline conditions or in the presence of amines (see Section 1.4). In addition, activating groups like the tosyl moiety may also be disposed for selective reactions (see Section 1.3.1).

Figure 1.25 Scheme of protecting group technique as the main tool for regioselective functionalization of cellulose exemplified for the 2,3-di-O-cellulose derivatives.

The most widely used protecting group for the primary OH group is the triphenylmethyl (trityl) moiety (Figure 1.26). Heterogeneous introduction of the trityl groups starts with an activated polymer obtained either by deacetylation of cellulose acetate (Harkness and Gray, 1990; Kondo and Gray, 1991) or by mercerization of cellulose (Kern et al., 2000) followed by a conversion in anhydrous pyridine. More efficient tritylation of cellulose yielding polymers with DS values of 1.0 takes place in DMA/LiCl (preferred solvent) and DMSO/SO2/diethylamine (Kasuya and Sawatari, 2000; Hagiwara et al., 1981). Methoxy-substituted triphenylmethyl compounds are more effective protecting groups for the primary hydroxyl group of cellulose (Camacho et al., 1996). The conversion of cellulose dissolved in DMA/LiCl with 4-monomethoxytriphenylmethyl chloride is 10 times faster than the reaction with unsubstituted trityl chloride. Complete functionalization of the primary hydroxyl groups occurs within 4 h and 70°C. Even after long reaction times, excess of the reagent, and elevated temperatures, alkylation at the positions 2 and 3 is less than 11%, which is in the same range as for the unsubstituted trityl function. Moreover, the detritylation proceeds 20 times faster (Heinze, 2004).

Figure 1.26 Protecting group techniques: tritylation with trityl chloride or derivatives in N,N-dimethyl acetamide (DMA)/LiCl, silylation with thexyldimethylchlorosilane in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP)/ammonia for the regioselective blocking of the primary OH group, and silylation in DMA/LiCl to protect the 6 and 2 positions simultaneously.

Trialkyl- (with at least one bulky alkyl moiety) and triarylsilyl groups are known to protect the primary groups of cellulose. Pawlowski describes the synthesis of tert-butyldimethylsilyl cellulose with a DS of 0.68 in DMA/LiCl with functionalization at position 6 (Pawlowski et al., 1988). Among this type of derivatives, 6-O-thexyldimethylsilyl cellulose is most suitable (Figure 1.26) (Koschella and Klemm, 1997; Petzold et al., 2003). The synthesis starts with a heterogeneous phase reaction in ammonia-saturated polar aprotic liquids at −15°C by conversion of the cellulose with TDS chloride leading to a specific state of dispersion after evaporation of the ammonia at about 40°C, which does not permit any further reaction of the secondary hydroxyl groups, even with a large reagent excess, increased temperature, or long reaction time (Petzold et al., 2003). The degree of TDS groups introduced by homogeneous silylation in DMA/LiCl to a total DS value of 0.99 is determined to be 85% at position 6 only (GC/MS analysis). However, the homogeneous reaction in DMA/LiCl may yield 2,6-di-O-TDS cellulose (Koschella and Klemm, 1997; Heinze, 2004; Fenn et al., 2007).

The structural uniformity and regioselectivity of the silylated cellulose products are characterized by means of one- and two-dimensional NMR techniques after subsequent acetylation of the remaining hydroxyl groups (Figure 1.27) (Hagiwara et al., 1981; Petzold et al., 2003) or after permethylation of the residual OH groups and chain degradation by means of HPLC and GC-MS (Mischnik et al., 1995; Camacho et al., 1996; Koschella and Klemm, 1997; Kern et al., 2000).

Figure 1.27 NMR spectrum (a) and /-correlated NMR spectrum (b) of peracetylated 6-O-thexyldimethylsilyl celluloses in CDCl3: assigned cross-peaks of the anhydroglucose unit (2,3-O-Ac-6-O-TDS) (Ac = acetyl). Reproduced with permission from Wiley–VCH, Petzold et al. (2003).

Recently, tert-butyldimethylsilyl cellulose with a degree of substitution of up to 2 could be obtained by homogeneous conversion of the biopolymer with tert-butyldimethylchlorosilane in DMA/LiCl in the presence of imidazole. The cellulose derivatives are characterized in detail by means of two-dimensional NMR spectroscopic techniques, including subsequent derivatization of the original polymer by consecutive methylation–desilylation–acetylation (Figure 1.28). The very well-resolved NMR spectra indicate that depending on the reaction temperature, 2,6-di-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl moieties are the main repeating units. 3,6-Di-O- and 6-mono-O-functionalized repeating units are identified in very small amounts if the reaction is carried out at room temperature. In addition, 2,3,6-tri-O-silylated functions appear if reaction is carried out at temperature of 100°C (Heinze et al., 2008b).

Figure 1.28, COSY NMR spectra of two acetyl methyl celluloses in CDCl3. Silylation conditions for (a) DSSi 1.98: molar ratio 1:3.5:4.2 (cellulose:TBS chloride:imidazole), 24 h, 20°C; (b) DSSi 2.11: molar ratio 1:4.0:4.8 (cellulose:TBS chloride:imidazole), 24 h, 100 °C; assigned cross-peaks: — cross-peaks of the unit 2,6-di-O-acetyl-3-mono-O-methyl (2,6-Ac-3-Me); ···· cross-peaks of the unit 6-mono-O-acetyl-2,3-di-O-methyl (6-Ac-2,3-Me), positions marked with ′, (dashed lines) cross-peaks of the unit 3,6-di-O-acetyl-2-mono-O-methyl (3,6-Ac-2-Me), positions marked with ″, — — cross-peaks of the unit 2,3,6-tri-O-acetyl (2,3,6-Ac), positions marked with *. Adapted from Heinze et al. (2008b).

1.5.1 2,3-Di-O-Ethers of Cellulose

The 6-mono-O-trityl cellulose or the more efficient 6-O-mono-O-(4-mono-methoxy)trityl derivative and the 6-mono-O-TDS cellulose are used to synthesize regioselectively functionalized cellulose ethers at positions 2 and 3 after the exclusive cleavage of the protecting groups (Table 1.11). The deprotection is carried out most efficiently with HCl in a suitable solvent (e.g., THF) in case of trityl derivatives. Tetrabutylammonium fluoride in THF is most successful for the cleavage of the silyl groups in TDS-protected derivatives.

Table 1.11 Examples of Regioselectively Functionalized 2,3-Di-O-Cellulose Ethers.

The alkylation of the 6-O-trityl cellulose is carried out in DMSO with solid NaOH as base and the corresponding alkyl halides at 70°C within several hours. Interestingly, a small amount of water in the mixture (about 1 mL per 60 mL DMSO) increases the conversion up to a nearly complete functionalization of the secondary hydroxyl groups (Kondo and Gray, 1991). Ionic 2,3-O