Practical Manual of Clinical Obesity - Robert Kushner - E-Book

Practical Manual of Clinical Obesity E-Book

Robert Kushner

0,0
56,99 €

-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.

Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

Practical Manual of Clinical Obesity provides practical, accessible and expert advice on the clinical diagnosis and management of obesity and will be your perfect go-to tool in the management of your patients.

Information is clear, didactic and attractively presented, with every chapter containing plenty of engaging text features such as key points, pitfall boxes, management flowcharts and case studies to enable a rapid
understanding of obesity diagnosis and management. Key clinical trials and major international society guidelines are referred to throughout.

Topics covered include:
• Assessment of the patient, including patient history, examination and investigations
• Patterns, risks and benefits of weight loss
• Evaluation of management options: diet, exercise, drugs, psychological treatments, and surgery
• Management of obesity related co-morbidities

Practical Manual of Clinical Obesity is ideal reading for endocrinologists of all levels, as well as all other health professionals who manage obese patients such as specialist nurses, dieticians, and GP’s with an interest in obesity management.

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern

Seitenzahl: 301

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013

Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



Contents

Preface

PART 1 The Biology of Obesity—Why It Occurs

CHAPTER 1 Energy Balance and Body Weight Homeostasis

Introduction

Basic concepts and principles in human energetics

Components of energy expenditure

Mechanisms of thermogenesis

Inter-individual variability in metabolic adaptation

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 2 The Genetic Basis of Obesity

Introduction

Evidence for the heritability of fat mass

Gene–environment interactions

Molecular mechanisms involved in energy homeostasis

Human monogenic obesity syndromes

Fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO)

Pleiotropic (“syndromic”) obesity

Summary

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 3 Adipocyte Biology

Introduction

TAG storage and release

Secretory function of WAT

Brown adipose tissue (BAT)

Conclusion

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 4 Fetal and Infant Origins of Obesity

Introduction

Measurement

Conceptual framework of early origins of obesity

Modifiable developmental disease determinants

Summary

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 5 Metabolic Fuels and Obesity

Introduction

Physiological conditions in weight-stable individuals

Exercise

Summary

Key web links

Further reading

PART 2 Clinical Management of the Obese Individual

CHAPTER 6 Practical Guide to Clinical Assessment and Treatment Planning

Setting up a clinic

Broaching the topic of obesity

Taking an obesity-focused history

Physical examination of the obese patient

Identifying the high-risk obese patient

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 7 Stages of Obesity and Weight Maintenance

Stages of obesity

Factors affecting weight loss maintenance

The successful weight maintainer

Further reading

CHAPTER 8 Dietary Management

Specific strategies to help patients reduce calories

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 9 Physical Activity and Exercise

Exercise and weight reduction

Exercise and obesity-related CVD

Key web links

Reference

Further reading

CHAPTER 10 Behavior Therapy

Principles of behavior therapy

Components of behavioral treatment

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 11 Pharmacotherapy

The legacy of anti-obesity medications

Drugs that reduce food intake primarily by acting on the CNS

Drugs that reduce fat absorption

Weight-gaining medications

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 12 Surgery

Weight loss procedures

Weight loss and complications

Effect on co-morbid conditions

Changes in QOL after bariatric surgery

Patient selection and pre-operative management

Post-operative management

Key web links

References

Further reading

PART 3 Clinical Management of Obesity-Related Co-morbidities

CHAPTER 13 Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases

Principles guiding management

Management algorithm

Key web links

References

Further reading

CHAPTER 14 Obesity and Reproductive Health

Obesity and reproductive health

Managing PCOS

Obesity and assisted reproduction therapy (ART)

Managing the pregnant obese woman

Key societies

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 15 Gastro-intestinal and Hepatobiliary Disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

Gallbladder disease

Gastritis and GERD

Other GI disorders

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 16 Respiratory Disease

Obesity and lung function

Common respiratory diseases associated with obesity

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS)

Management algorithm for OSA

Key web links

Further reading

CHAPTER 17 Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease

Introduction

Obesity and CVD risk

Physical fitness and cardiovascular risk in obesity

Obesity and hypertension

Obesity and stroke

Obesity and CHF

Obesity and sudden death

Management of cardiovascular risk in obesity

Key web links

Reference

Further reading

CHAPTER 18 Obesity: Mental Health and Social Consequences

Principles for management

Obesity and mental illness

Obesity and major psychiatric diseases

Obesity and mental well-being in children

Management

Key web link

Further reading

CHAPTER 19 Obesity and Musculo-skeletal Disease

Obesity and musculo-skeletal disease

Obesity and osteoarthritis

Obesity and gout

Obesity and low back pain

Management algorithms

Key web link

Further reading

CHAPTER 20 The Obese Patient in Hospital

The obese patient in hospital

Specialist equipment for the morbidly obese

Emergency care

Managing the severely obese in hospital

Key web links

Further reading

Conversion Table

Index

This edition first published 2013 © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Wiley-Blackwell is an imprint of John Wiley & Sons, formed by the merger of Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business with Blackwell Publishing.

Registered OfficeJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

Editorial Offices9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UKThe Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030–5774, USA

For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell

The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.

Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting a specific method, diagnosis, or treatment by physicians for any particular patient. The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. Readers should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization or Website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or Website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet Websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. No warranty may be created or extended by any promotional statements for this work. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any damages arising herefrom.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been applied for

ISBN 978-0-4706-5476-7 (Paperback)

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.

Cover image: iStockphoto.comCover design by Grounded Design Ltd.

Preface

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), obesity is one of the greatest public health challenges of the 21st century. In 2008, more than 1.4 billion adults, 20 years and older, were found to be overweight. Of these, over 200 million men and nearly 300 million women were obese. In the 27 member states of the European Union, approximately 60% of adults and over 20% of school-age children are overweight or obese. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the USA is even more distressing, affecting over 68% of adults and 33% of children and adolescents. Overweight and obesity are now linked to more deaths worldwide than underweight. The cause for the rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity is multifaceted, brought about by an interaction between predisposing genetic and metabolic factors and a rapidly changing “modern” environment.

The health risks of excess weight have been demonstrated in multiple population studies. Obesity significantly increases a person’s risk of developing numerous non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, sleep disturbance, and other disabilities. The risk of developing more than one of these diseases (co-morbidity) also increases with increasing body weight. Accordingly, obesity-related health-care costs are soaring and contribute to an increasing percentage of total health-care expenditures. These data suggest that halting and reversing the obesity epidemic will require involvement of multiple stakeholders, including the medical profession.

Regardless of which health-care area a provider is working, clinicians are being called upon to provide care for persons affected by obesity. It is no longer sufficient to simply advise our patients to “eat less and move more.” Obesity is now considered a complex disease determined by ­genetic, physiological, behavioral, psychosocial, cultural, economic, and societal factors. The etiological mechanisms underlying obesity-related co-­morbidities, for example, hemodynamic alterations, insulin resistance, hormonal abnormalities, ectopic fat, and secretion of adipokines, continue to be clarified. Research over the past decade has also elucidated the metabolic and genetic control systems that govern regulation of body weight and energy expenditure, leading to the development of novel pharmacological and surgical interventions. Each year new intervention trials demonstrate the beneficial effect of weight loss on a myriad of obesity-related co-­morbidities.

In an effort to translate the emerging science and practice of obesity care for clinicians, the Practical Manual of Clinical Obesity has been written as a practical, evidence-based companion guide to the textbook Clinical Obesity in Adults and Children, edited by P.G. Kopelman, I.D. Caterson, and W.H. Dietz. The manual is intended for physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, and students who care for overweight and obese individuals. The 20 concise chapters of the manual are divided into three major sections: The Biology of Obesity—Why It Occurs, Clinical Management of the Obese Individual, and Clinical Management of Obesity-Related Co-morbidities. Each chapter includes features that are directly intended to improve its readability and usefulness for the busy clinician—key points, case studies, boxed figures, pitfalls, key web links, and references. A collective effort has been made by the three editors to write all chapters with “one voice.” We hope that we have succeeded in publishing a manual that will be a valuable resource for the care of patients affected by obesity.

R.F. KushnerV. LawrenceS. Kumar

PART 1

The Biology of Obesity—Why It Occurs

Victor Lawrence, Section Editor

CHAPTER 1

Energy Balance and Body Weight Homeostasis

Key points
Energy intake is highly variable, and mechanisms to defend a “set point” in energy stores appear to have evolved.Energy is spent doing useful physical, chemical, and electrical work and also producing heat (thermogenesis) as a by-product of these activities.Thermogenesis is subject to regulation and may be adapted to prevailing energy balance.Basal metabolic rate (BMR) increases predominantly in proportion to lean body mass and is higher in the obese. Its fall with caloric restriction may present a barrier to long-term weight loss.Energy is also spent in voluntary (exercise) and other non-exercise activity ­thermogenesis (NEAT).Spontaneous physical activity (SPA) is a major component of NEAT and is regulated by the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), and its fall with caloric restriction may present a barrier to successful weight loss.Genetic and acquired variations in the amount and efficiency of these largely unconscious processes may explain some inter- and intra-individual variability in energy metabolism and thus predisposition toward obesity.Food (energy) intake is subject to complex regulation by circulating and gut-derived signals which include leptin.In addition to its effects on energy intake, leptin has the ability to stimulate adaptive thermogenesis via SPA, uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, and possibly via futile cycling. Many of these effects depend on the SNS.Leptin deficiency or receptor mutations are a very rare cause of human obesity. Nevertheless, relative defects in leptin action may (at least in theory) influence body weight homeostasis and are the subject of current research.Brown adipose tissue (BAT) exists in adults; it is regulated by the SNS and contributes to thermogenesis. Stimulating its differentiation and activation is a target of current research.
CASE STUDIES

Case study 1

CF is a 24-year-old woman with a body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m2. She describes an apparently healthy diet which she considers to be no higher in calories than that taken by many of her friends and family who do not have weight problems. She also walks regularly. She feels immensely frustrated over her seeming inability to achieve or maintain an ideal body weight despite good habits and is starting to feel like giving up.
Comment: You explore her concerns and find that she is certain that she has an undiagnosed metabolic problem leading to a slow metabolism, a problem she feels runs in her family despite repeatedly normal tests of thyroid function. You explain that the body does adapt over time to a change in weight and the new higher or lower weight tends to be opposed by changes in metabolic rate and overall energy expenditure which can make the achievement and maintenance of weight loss progressively harder. You arrange to measure her resting metabolic rate principally to demonstrate to her that it lies in the range expected for body composition, age, and sex. You explain how SPA may lessen over time in people who are losing weight and discuss ways of maintaining this, for example, walking to the shops, taking stairs rather than escalators, and measuring the number of daily footsteps with a pedometer. You also explain that periods of weight maintenance are perfectly logical (and successful) as part of a long-term program of weight control and may permit the body to acclimatize and form a new set point—the only outcome that represents failure is to give up and regain any weight lost. She finds sufficient motivation in these concepts to re-energize herself in her weight loss goals.

Case study 2

LW, an obese 58-year-old man, has been very gradually but successfully reducing his weight with your support over the past year. However, his weight loss trajectory has stopped over the past month and he has begun to regain weight.
Comment: You enquire about changes in his circumstances and discover that his primary care physician recently started him on a beta-blocker following possible, although incompletely ascertained, intolerance of first-line drug therapy for his hypertension. You explain that beta-blockers inhibit the actions of the SNS. This could affect his overall energy balance in several ways, including reduced lipolysis (and possibly therefore reduced futile cycling of fatty acids between free and esterified forms) and reductions in thermogenesis, SPA, and in overall metabolic rate. Furthermore, beta-blockers may also reduce exercise capacity and cause fatigue, all of which may counter attempted weight loss. Although the magnitude of these effects is small (typically 1–2 kg, 2.2–4.4 lb), it is possible that some individuals may be affected more than this. Older “non-selective” beta-blockers appear to be more problematic than newer “cardioselective” agents. On discussing this, together with possible adverse effects on insulin sensitivity, you agree to try an angiotensin receptor blocking agent.

Introduction

In most individuals, body weight remains relatively stable over years to decades despite wide variations in energy intake and expenditure. This would seem to suggest that body weight is rigorously defended by ­homeostatic mechanisms. However, whilst a useful defense against the development of obesity, any tendency to defend a set point once obesity is established may act as a barrier to the achievement and maintenance of planned weight loss.

Many individuals seeking professional help in relation to their own obesity become confused or frustrated by what appears to be inability to lose weight (or a tendency to gain weight) despite behaviors that might appear no less healthy than other individuals who do not appear to have a weight problem. Some will have developed counterproductive health beliefs that may act as barriers to weight loss (e.g., that they must have a slow meta­bolism and that this is genetically programmed or is the result of some ­undiagnosed metabolic disorder and therefore beyond their control). These misunderstandings can rapidly evolve into a sense of “learned helplessness” and all too often result in disengagement and failure to achieve goals.

Clear and accurate explanations of the complexities of energy balance regulation are often of practical help, particularly where such frustration or despondency exists.

Basic concepts and principles in human energetics

Energy balance and laws of thermodynamics

According to the first law of thermodynamics,

The chemical energy obtained from food is used to perform a variety of work, such as

synthesis of new macromolecules (

chemical work

)

muscular contraction (

mechanical work

)

maintenance of ionic gradients across membranes (

electrical work

)

If the intake and expenditure of energy are not equal, then a change in body energy content will occur, with negative energy balance resulting in the degradation of the body’s energy stores (glycogen, fat, and protein) or positive energy balance resulting in an increase in body energy stores, primarily as fat.

The second law of thermodynamics makes a distinction between the potential energy of food, useful work, and heat. It states essentially that

and describes the fact that when food is utilized in the body, these processes must be accompanied inevitably by some loss of heat. In other words, the conversion of available food energy is not a perfectly efficient process: about 75% of the chemical energy contained in foods may be ultimately dissipated as heat because of the inefficiency of intermediary metabolism. The energy “wasted” as heat may be calculated as the sum of BMR and adaptive thermogenesis. Adaptive thermogenesis refers to the increase in resting energy expenditure in response to stimuli such as food intake, cold, stress, and drugs.

Figure 1.1 Principles of energy balance within a schematic framework that depicts the transformation of energy from food to heat throughout the body. Note that on diets typically consumed in developed countries, the total energy losses in feces and urine are small (about 5%) so that the metabolizable energy available from these diets is around 95%. Reproduced from Kopelman et al. (eds). Clinical Obesity in Adults and Children, 3rd edn, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2010, with permission from Blackwell Publishing.

Components of energy expenditure

It is customary to consider human energy expenditure as being made up of three components:

Energy spent on basal metabolism (BMR)

Energy spent on physical activity (work done plus exercise- or ­non-exercise-associated thermogenesis)

The increase in resting energy expenditure in response to stimuli such as food, cold, stress, and drugs (adaptive thermogenesis).

These three components are depicted in Figure 1.1 and are described in the following text.

Basal (or resting) metabolic rate (BMR)

This is the largest component of energy expenditure for most individuals. Typically, BMR accounts for 60–75% of daily energy expenditure. It is measured under standardized conditions, that is, in an awake subject lying in the supine position, in a state of physical and mental rest in a comfortable warm environment, and in the morning in the post-absorptive state, usually 10–12 h after the last meal.

By far the most important determinant of BMR is body size, in particular lean (fat-free) body mass which is influenced by weight, height, age, and gender. Lean body mass is increased in obese individuals, although to a lesser extent than fat mass. This means that, counter to many obese subject’s expectations, their BMR is almost certainly higher than that of their lean counterparts, and a low BMR is, with the debatable exception of hypothyroidism, virtually never a direct cause of obesity. On the contrary, a higher BMR in obese subjects tends to oppose further weight gain, although its fall with weight loss may act as a barrier to successful weight management.

Measurement of BMR by indirect calorimetry is a non-invasive test used in a number of obesity clinics often as a means of demonstrating to an individual that their BMR lies within the range expected for body composition, age, and sex.

In addition to increasing BMR, there appears to be a decrease in metabolic efficiency in obese subjects, which also acts to favor a return to the previous “set point.” Subjects made under experimental conditions to maintain body weight at a level 10% above their initial body weight show a compensatory change in resting energy expenditure (approximately 15%), which reflects changes in metabolic efficiency that oppose the maintenance of a body weight that is above or below the set or preferred body weight.

Energy expenditure due to physical activity

Physical activity can represent up to 70% of daily energy expenditure in an individual involved in heavy manual work or competition athletics, although values of 10–25% are more usual in modern Westernized ­civilizations.

Energy expended in physical activity may be thought of as being spent either on deliberate “exercise” or on all other “non-exercise” activities. Non-exercise activities may be deliberate and consciously modifiable (e.g., daily tasks such as work, shopping, cooking), may be related to ­posture and balance, or may be involuntary purposeless movements (e.g., ­fidgeting, movements during sleep), the latter being termed spontaneous physical activity (SPA). The energy dissipated as heat through such forms of “non-exercise” activities is called non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT).

Levels of SPA are regulated in part by the SNS. Losses in body weight are accompanied by a major reduction in SPA, which can persist for several months after weight recovery and favor disproportionate recovery of fat mass. Twenty-four-hour energy expenditure attributed to SPA may vary between 100 and 700 kcal/day between individuals and can predict subsequent weight gain after a period of caloric restriction. In one study, more than 60% of the increase in total daily energy expenditure in response to overfeeding could be attributed to SPA, variability of which was the best predictor of individual weight gain.

Other components of NEAT also differ between obese and lean individuals. One study showed that obese participants were seated, on average, for 2 h longer per day than lean participants. This difference (corresponding to about 350 kcal/day) was not altered after weight gain in lean individuals or weight loss in obese individuals, suggesting that it might be biologically determined. Increased skeletal muscle work efficiency after experimentally induced weight loss has also been reported.

It seems likely that such mechanisms form a barrier to the effectiveness of planned weight loss regimens and are subject to as yet largely unknown genetic influences.

Energy expenditure in response to various thermogenic stimuli

Exertion, whether as exercise or as NEAT, generates heat as a by-product and contributes to thermogenesis. However, several non-exertional thermogenic stimuli with relevance to body weight regulation also exist. These include the following.

Diet-induced thermogenesis or the “thermic effect of food”

The thermic effect of food refers to heat production due to the mechanical and chemical consequences of food ingestion. This process dissipates some 7–9% of the energy content of a typical mixed meal and is affected by meal size, meal composition, meal frequency, thermogenic ingredients such as caffeine, and the individual subject’s insulin sensitivity.

Psychological thermogenesis

Psychological thermogenesis refers to heat dissipation over baseline in response to states such as anxiety or stress. Thermogenesis in this setting may depend on both changes in physical activity (e.g., SPA) and via central (e.g., endocrine) mechanisms.

Cold-induced thermogenesis

Energy is spent on maintaining temperature homeostasis through “­shivering” (muscular activity) and “non-shivering” (SNS activity, partly via BAT) responses to cold. The extent to which maintenance of warm environments through modern central heating may contribute to obesity is at present unknown, although average temperature settings continue to rise steadily and there is some evidence that a lack of need to respond to “mild thermogenic stress” may lead to a long-term loss of BAT.

Drug-induced thermogenesis

Caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, and other prescription or “recreational” drugs may stimulate the dissipation of energy as heat. Of these, the most clinically relevant is probably the effect of smoking cessation on body weight with some 7 kg (15.4 lb) weight gained on average, partly through changes in food intake and partly through a reduction in thermogenesis. Discouraging the abuse of tobacco for weight control purposes remains a considerable practical challenge for clinicians.

Mechanisms of thermogenesis

The SNS, through its neurotransmitter norepinephrine (NE), acts via α- and β-adrenoceptors to influence heat production by either increasing the use of ATP (e.g., ion pumping and substrate cycling) or by reducing the efficiency of ATP synthesis. These actions induce metabolic inefficiency, which has the potential to oppose any change from the body weight set point.

The recent realization that brown fat exists in adult humans has rekindled interest in pharmacologic activation of BAT in anti-obesity therapy.

Leptin is a cytokine whose principal role is thought to be to defend minimum fat stores in the longer term. As fat stores fall, leptin levels also fall, with the net result being that of reduced thermogenesis and increased metabolic efficiency. This action is an example of a “lipostatic” model of weight defense: the set point is for body fat stores, and homeostatic regulation (e.g., by leptin pathways) acts to defend this set point (Box 1.1).

Inter-individual variability in metabolic adaptation

A striking feature of virtually all experiments of human overfeeding (­lasting from a few weeks to a few months) is the wide range of individual variability in the amount of weight gain per unit of excess energy ­consumed. Some of these differences in the efficiency of weight gain could be attributed to inter-individual variability in the gain of lean tissue relative to fat tissue (i.e., variability in the composition of weight gain), but mostly lie in the ability to convert excess calories to heat, that is, in the large inter-individual capacity for diet-induced (and other forms of adaptive) thermogenesis.

Box 1.1 Leptin effects on thermogenesis.
Diminished skeletal muscle work efficiency
Increased SPA
Thermogenic action of leptin via the SNS on BAT and skeletal muscle
Central effects on SPA-associated thermogenesis
Regulation of reward signals, motivated behaviors that influence appetite, and locomotor activity
Direct action on skeletal muscle, possibly through stimulation of “futile” substrate cycling between de novo lipogenesis and lipid oxidation

Over-and under-feeding experiments suggest that in addition to the control of food intake, changes in the composition of weight (via partitioning between lean and fat tissues) and in metabolic efficiency (via adaptive thermogenesis) both play an important role in the regulation of body weight and body composition. Evidence from identical-twin studies suggests that the magnitude of these adaptive changes is strongly influenced by the genetic makeup of the individual.

Current evidence suggests the existence of two distinct but overlapping control systems underlying adaptive thermogenesis.

One control system responds rapidly to attenuate the impact of changes in food intake on changes in body weight through alterations in the activity of the SNS which is suppressed during starvation and increased during overfeeding.

The other control system, exemplified by leptin, has a slower time-­constant since it operates as a feedback loop between the size of the fat stores and thermogenesis. Its suppression during weight (and fat) losses serves to restore body fat to its set or preferred level.

These autoregulatory control systems operating through adjustments in heat production or thermogenesis play a crucial role in attenuating and correcting deviations of body weight from its set or preferred value. The extent to which these adjustments through adaptive thermogenesis are brought about is dependent upon the environment (e.g., diet composition) and is highly ­variable from one individual to another. In societies where food is plentiful all year round and physical activity demands are low, the resultant subtle vari­ations among individuals in adaptive thermogenesis can, in dynamic systems and over the long term, be important in determining long-term constancy of body weight in some and in provoking the drift toward obesity in others.

Pitfalls
Significant weight loss is followed by metabolic adaptation which tends to oppose it. This includes reduced SPA, increased metabolic efficiency, reduced resting metabolic rate, and increased skeletal work efficiency. Losing weight in the short term is often achievable with relative ease. Difficulties presented by defense of a set point are a common reason for failure to maintain weight loss in the longer term, and explanations may help keep the patient engaged.Metabolic rate is higher in the obese and correlates best with lean body mass which is also higher in them. However, many obese people consider that they have an undiagnosed metabolic problem and may lose confidence if this belief is not sympathetically addressed.Energy may be spent by increasing NEAT, for example, taking stairs, not using a car to travel short distances, cycling to work, and so on.Periods of weight maintenance may be an effective strategy to permit adaptation to a newly reduced body weight and is certainly better than giving up. The only completely failed weight loss episode is one where weight is initially lost but regained after despondency sets in, the episode concluding with acquisition of a new weight higher than that at the start.Not exploring a patient’s belief that because they find weight loss harder than others, they are unable to do it. There is no doubt that some people and some lifestyles do present challenges, but they can be overcome.Diets that are difficult to digest, require energy to obtain and chew, and that are low in calorie density may help with weight loss. Compare, for example, walking to a market to buy fresh carrots or growing one’s own (and perhaps eating them raw) with snacking on crisps or biscuits kept in the house.Not appreciating sympathetically the degree to which the thermogenic and appetite-reducing effects of tobacco consumption may be used by some patients as an adjunct to weight control.

Key web links

Weight Control Information Network (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases). http://win.niddk.nih.gov/resources/ [accessed on December 29, 2012].

Association for the Study of Obesity. http://www.aso.org.uk/ [accessed on December 29, 2012].

National Institutes of Health. http://health.nih.gov/topic/Obesity [accessed on December 29, 2012].

Further reading

Garland, T., Jr., Schutz, H., Chappell, M.A. et al. (2011) The biological control of voluntary exercise, spontaneous physical activity and daily energy expenditure in relation to obesity: Human and rodent perspectives. Journal Experimental Biology, 214 (Pt 2), 206–229.

Gautron, L. & Elmquist, J.K. (2011) Sixteen years and counting: An update on leptin in energy balance. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 121, 2087–2093.

King, N.A., Hopkins, M., Caudwell, P., Stubbs, R.J. & Blundell J.E. (2008) Individual variability following 12 weeks of supervised exercise: Identification and characterization of compensation for exercise-induced weight loss. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 177–184.

Li, M.D. (2011) Leptin and beyond: An odyssey to the central control of body weight. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 84, 1–7.

van Marken Lichtenbelt, W.D. & Schrauwen, P. (2011) Implications of nonshivering thermogenesis for energy balance regulation in humans. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 301, R285–R296.

van Marken Lichtenbelt, W.D., Vanhommerig, J.W., Smulders, N.M. et al. (2009) Cold-activated brown adipose tissue in healthy men. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1500–1508. Erratum in New England Journal of Medicine (2009), 360, 1917.

Richard, D. & Picard, F. (2011) Brown fat biology and thermogenesis. Frontiers in Bioscience, 16, 1233–1260.

Rosenbaum, M., Hirsch, J., Gallagher, D.A. & Leibel, R.L. (2008) Long-term persistence of adaptive thermogenesis in subjects who have maintained a reduced body weight. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 88, 906–912.

Schoeller, D.A. (2009) The energy balance equation: Looking back and looking forward are two very different views. Nutrition Review, 67, 249–254.

Sharma, A.M., Pischon, T., Hardt, S., Kunz, I. & Luft, F.C. (2001) Hypothesis: ß-­adrenergic receptor blockers and weight gain—a systematic analysis. Hypertension, 37, 250–254.

CHAPTER 2

The Genetic Basis of Obesity

Key points
Genetic influences may explain up to 70% of population variation in BMI. However, the influence of very many genes, all interacting with the environment, is likely to determine individual susceptibility. The presence of risk alleles in all the currently known susceptibility loci only explains a few percent of this variance.Most genetic influences are likely to be polygenic (depending on very many different genes rather than a single risk allele).Complex gene–environment interactions are likely to explain why obesity has become so prevalent recently, although the human gene pool has changed little over the past 30 years. This is well exemplified by the fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) risk allele.Many genetic forms of obesity are syndromic: the presence of learning difficulties, growth disorders, dysmorphic features, or profound early-onset obesity should certainly prompt consideration of a syndromic form of obesity.A number of monogenic obesity syndromes have now been described, most notably that of leptin deficiency but also including MC4 receptor and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) mutations among others. The rarity of these conditions means that their importance lies more in unraveling mechanisms and pathways important in obesity rather than in the clinical management of the individual patient. Nevertheless, profound early-onset obesity, particularly if associated with other specific features, for example, adrenocortical insufficiency, recurrent infection, and a family history of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, should prompt consideration of these rare but potentially treatable monogenic syndromes.MC4 receptor mutations may explain up to 6% of non-syndromic early-onset severe obesity, although the precise role of risk alleles in more typical obesity is currently debated.Unraveling genetic mechanisms has done much to further the understanding of regulatory pathways governing body weight and perhaps how we have come to view the whole problem of obesity.Further advances in obesity genetics have the potential to herald the development of more rational mechanism-based interventions at both the individual and population levels.
CASE STUDIES

Case study 1

A 42-year-old woman who, together with several other members of her family, has been struggling with her obesity for some years has heard that between 40% and 70% of adult obesity may be attributable to genetic constitution. She has essentially given up on trying to lose weight as a consequence and is referred to you for advice. She asks what can be done about her genetic problem and how long it will take to find a cure.
Comment: You acknowledge her feelings of negativity, examine her to exclude features of monogenetic or syndromic obesity, and explain that although overall genetic influences do appear to be important and are the subject of much research interest, no one single gene is likely to be responsible in her case. You go on to explain that any one individual’s personal energy balance equation depends on the sum of the tiny effects of hundreds or possibly thousands of genes, none of which alter the fact that she will lose weight if she is able to achieve a state of negative energy balance through diet and exercise. Genetic influences leading to the “thrifty phenotype” may well explain why some people have to work harder to achieve and maintain weight loss than others but do not make it impossible to do so. You explain how genes will have changed little over the past 50 years and it is the effect of our changed environment on these genes that has led to the recent upsurge in obesity and we do have some control over our environment. You therefore encourage her to plan small but achievable lifestyle changes that she agrees she can adopt. You point out that genetic studies may well identify useful treatments for obesity in the future, although it usually takes many years for a novel drug to come to the market from its first conception.

Case study 2

A 34-year-old man with a BMI of 46 kg/m2