122,99 €
Tighten due diligence procedures for more successful hedge fund investment
Practical Operational Due Diligence on Hedge Funds is an encyclopaedic, comprehensive reference, written from the perspective of an experienced practitioner. Accompanied by a useful archive of factual material on different hedge fund issues, including failures, fines, and closures, this book focuses on the areas due diligence professionals should address, and explains why they're important. Extensive discussion of publicised cases identifies the manager entities and actual fund vehicles involved, and provides commentary on what could have been done differently in each case, backed by actual regulatory materials, such as SEC complaints, that recreate the events that took place. Readers gain a deeper understanding of the many facets of due diligence and the many possible pitfalls, learning how standardise processes and avoid major errors and oversights.
The amount of money managed by hedge funds has almost doubled from the $1 trillion under management at the time of the financial crisis. Hedge funds can be extremely risky, but can be extremely profitable — as money increasingly flows back in, due diligence on these alternative investments becomes more and more critical. This book provides complete guidance toward the due diligence process, with plentiful real-world examples.
Proper due diligence can be a massive undertaking, but thoroughness is essential when the price of failure is so high. Practical Operational Due Diligence on Hedge Funds provides the details professionals need to be on point every time.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1940
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2016
Series Page
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Preface
Acknowledgments
About the Author
Disclaimer
Part I: Processes and Procedures
Chapter 1: What is a Hedge Fund?
1.1 THE ROLE OF A HEDGE FUND IN AN INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
Chapter 2: Defining Operational Issues
2.1 CLASSIFYING PROBLEMS AND FAILURES
2.2 FRAUD
2.3 INSOLVENCY AND WINDING UP
2.4 INVESTMENT LOSSES OUTSIDE THE FUND'S STATED VOLATILITY RANGE
2.5 OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS, FUND DEFAULTS AND MATERIAL BREACHES OF CONTRACT
2.6 REGULATORY INTERVENTION RESULTING IN A SETTLEMENT, FINE OR FUND CLOSURE
2.7 WHAT HAPPENS WHEN IT ALL GOES WRONG
Chapter 3: Structures for Investment in Alternatives
3.1 A QUICK PRIMER ON FUND STRUCTURES
3.2 LIMITED COMPANIES
3.3 UNIT TRUSTS
3.4 PARTNERSHIPS
3.5 MANAGED ACCOUNTS
3.6 MASTER FEEDER AND MINI MASTER STRUCTURES
3.7 UMBRELLA STRUCTURES
3.8 UCITS
3.9 THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR INVESTORS
3.10 REGULATORY ARBITRAGE
Chapter 4: Is the Fund for Real? Establishing the Basics
4.1 CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENTS
4.2 FUND CONTRACTS AND THE BASICS OF CONTRACT REVIEWS
4.3 SERVICE PROVIDERS TO THE FUND
4.4 MANAGER VISITS
4.5 BACKGROUND CHECKS
4.6 INITIAL QUESTIONNAIRES TO COMMENCE DUE DILIGENCE WORK
4.7 “GENERIC RISKS” IN DOCUMENTS AND CONTRACTS
Chapter 5: Understanding Fund Operations and Controls
5.1 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND WHAT THEY INVOLVE
5.2 OPERATIONAL STRUCTURES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT AN INVESTMENT STRATEGY
5.3 ESTABLISHING THE EXISTENCE OF CONTROLS
Chapter 6: Governance – Managing Risk Through a Non-Executive Board
6.1 INVESTOR-NOMINATED DIRECTORS
6.2 MANAGING RISK AS A NON-EXECUTIVE BOARD
Chapter 7: Reporting to Members and Statutory Reporting
7.1 STATUTORY REPORTING
7.2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7.3 DESIGNING A TEMPLATE FOR REVIEWING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7.4 SHAREHOLDER VOTING: THE AUTOMATIC PROXY
7.5 INVESTOR REPORTING AND TRANSPARENCY
7.6 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND TRANSPARENCY
Chapter 8: The Curse of Leverage (Fund Liabilities)
8.1 WHO PROVIDES FINANCE
8.2 HOW FINANCING IS SECURED
8.3 HOW COLLATERAL CREATES FUND RISK
8.4 UNDERSTANDING DEFAULT CLAUSES AND COVENANTS
8.5 COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT AND THE CONCEPT OF MARGINING
8.6 REHYPOTHECATION
8.7 BLOW-UPS DUE TO LEVERAGE
Chapter 9: Fund Assets
9.1 VALUATION CONCEPTS
9.2 DESIGNING PRINCIPLES FOR VALUATIONS
9.3 VALUATIONS FROM AN ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE
9.4 AIMA RECOMMENDATIONS
9.5 VALUING LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS AND ILLIQUID INVESTMENTS
9.6 VALUATION TRICKS AND DISCREPANCIES INCLUDING ACCOUNTING AND DEALING NAVS
9.7 LIQUIDITY
9.8 STYLE DRIFT
9.9 THE SIDE POCKET
9.10 REVIEWING DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS
9.11 BETTING THE HOUSE AND ITS CONTENTS
9.12 NAKED SHORTS AND OPTIONS
9.13 MONTHLY REPORTING AND WHAT IT MEANS
9.14 HEDGING CURRENCY RISK AND IMPLICATIONS FOR LIQUIDITY
9.15 REALISING FEES ON A FUND AND DEFERRALS
9.16 THE BASICS ON TAXATION OF HEDGE FUNDS
Chapter 10: Fraud
10.1 PHANTOM FUNDS AND THEFT
10.2 PONZI SCHEMES
10.3 INTENTIONAL MISVALUATION
10.4 PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT
10.5 MISREPRESENTATION/MISREPORTING
10.6 THE NICK LEESON SYNDROME: ROGUE TRADERS
10.7 COVERING UP MISTAKES
Chapter 11: Fees: the Essence of Hedge Funds
11.1 HIGH WATER MARKS, HURDLES AND CLAW BACK PROVISIONS
11.2 WHAT DOES IT COST TO RUN A FUND?
11.3 CAN INVESTORS POSE A RISK TO THE SURVIVAL OF A FUND?
11.4 THE GATE
11.5 REDEMPTION TERMS AND LOCK-UPS
11.6 FEES ON SIDE POCKETS AND ILLIQUIDS
11.7 THE CAPITAL BASE OF THE FUND
11.8 ALIGNING INTERESTS
11.9 ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES: FUND DILUTION, REBALANCING AND BOX MANAGEMENT
Chapter 12: Regulatory Actions, Politics and Market Confidence
12.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF SUCCESSFUL COMPLAINTS AND DEFENCES
12.2 THE BASICS OF AN SEC COMPLAINT
12.3 INVESTIGATIONS BY THE UK FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY
12.4 LARGE FINANCIAL SERVICES FIRMS VS SMALL FINANCIAL SERVICES FIRMS
12.5 MANAGING ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY
12.6 AIFMD
12.7 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION
12.8 INVESTOR PROTECTION THROUGH REGULATION
12.9 IDENTIFYING FUTURE RISKS
Chapter 13: Key Man Risk, Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity
13.1 THE HOUSE OF CARDS – DISASTER RECOVERY OR BUSINESS CONTINUITY
13.2 WHOSE INFORMATION IS IT ANYWAY?
13.3 INSURANCE
Chapter 14: Negotiating Terms and Exercising Rights
14.1 THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCUMENT
14.2 THE NECESSITY FOR SIDE AGREEMENTS
14.3 THE IMPLICATIONS OF SIDE AGREEMENTS
14.4 THINGS TO CONSIDER
14.5 EXERCISING SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
14.6 TAKING OVER THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
14.7 EXITING OR REDEEMING FROM A FUND
Chapter 15: Risk Ratings and Scoring
15.1 SCORING: TEMPTATIONS AND DANGERS
15.2 RISK MAPPING AND SOX CONTROLS
15.4 EXTERNAL RATING AGENCIES
15.5 OUTSOURCING DUE DILIGENCE BY FUNDS OF FUNDS AND INSTITUTIONS
Chapter 16: Marketing to Investors
16.1 WHAT THE PROSPECTUS DOES NOT SAY
16.2 DOES OPERATIONAL RISK REALLY MATTER?
16.3 MARKETING AS A DIFFERENTIATING FACTOR
16.4 CAREER RISK MANAGEMENT
16.5 INVESTMENT SELECTION PROCESSES –THE DECEPTIVENESS OF THE POWER OF VETO AND OVERRIDING CONTROLS
Part II: Case Studies
Chapter 17: Case Studies Pre-2000
17.1 FLESCHNER BECKER ASSOCIATES
17.2 D.E. SHAW & CO LP
17.3 ASKIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT L.P.
17.4 GUARENTE-HARRINGTON ASSOCIATES
17.5 HUBSHMAN MANAGEMENT CORP
17.6 INVESTOR OVERSEAS SERVICES LIMITED
17.7 LONG-TERM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT L.P.
17.8 NIEDERHOFFER INVESTMENTS INC/NCZ COMMODITIES INC
17.9 ODEY ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD
17.10 OMEGA ADVISORS INC
17.11 PHAROS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
17.12 PIPER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
17.13 STEADMAN SECURITY CORPORATION
17.14 STEINHARDT MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC
17.15 TAKARA ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Chapter 18: Case Studies 2000
18.1 ASHBURY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
18.2 LASER ADVISERS INC
18.3 MANHATTAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC
18.4 MARICOPA INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
18.5 PENTA INVESTMENT ADVISERS LTD
18.6 SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT LLC
18.7 TIGER MANAGEMENT CORP.
Chapter 19: Case Studies 2001
19.1 E THOMAS JUNG AND E THOMAS JUNG PARTNERS LTD
19.2 MARQUE MILLENNIUM GROUP, INC.
19.3 HEARTLAND ADVISORS INC
Chapter 20: Case Studies 2002
20.1 BEACON HILL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
20.2 INTEGRAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LP
20.3 KLESCH & CO LIMITED
20.4 ORCA FUNDS INC
20.5 TROUT TRADING MANAGEMENT COMPANY LTD
Chapter 21: Case Studies 2003
21.1 CPTR LLC
21.2 CANARY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
21.3 EIFUKU INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED
21.4 J.T. INVESTMENT GROUP INC AND NEW RESOURCE INVESTMENT GROUP INC
21.5 LANCER MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC AND LANCER MANAGEMENT GROUP II LLC
21.6 LIPPER HOLDINGS, LLC
21.7 MILLENNIUM CAPITAL GROUP LLC
Chapter 22: Case Studies 2004
22.1 DOBBINS OFFSHORE CAPITAL LLC
22.2 FOUNTAINHEAD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
22.3 LF GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LLC
22.4 NEXTRA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SGR
Chapter 23: Case Studies 2005
23.1 CREEDON KELLER & PARTNERS
23.2 AMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PTE LTD
23.3 APPLEGATE INVESTMENTS
23.4 AMERINDO INVESTMENT ADVISORS INC
23.5 LAKE DOW CAPITAL, LLC
23.6 BAILEY COATES ASSET MANAGEMENT LLP
23.7 BAYOU MANAGEMENT LLC
23.8 AJR CAPITAL INC AND CENTURY MAXIM FUND INC.
23.9 DURUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
23.10 ENTRUST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
23.11 EPG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
23.12 HMC INTERNATIONAL, LLC
23.13 K.L. GROUP LLC, KL FLORIDA LLC & KL TRIANGULUM MANAGEMENT LLC
23.14 HUNTER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
23.15 LINUXOR ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
23.16 LYCEUM CAPITAL LP
23.17 MARIN CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
23.18 MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC
23.19 NORSHIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT (CANADA) LTD
23.20 PHILADELPHIA ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
23.21 PHOENIX KAPITALDIENST GMBH
23.22 PIPPIN INVESTMENTS
23.23 PORTUS ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT INC
23.24 REFCO INC.
23.25 SPRINGER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC
23.26 TENET ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
23.27 MELHADO, FLYNN & ASSOCIATES INC
23.28 VERAS INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC
23.29 WOOD RIVER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
Chapter 24: Case Studies 2006
24.1 AMARANTH ADVISORS LLC
24.2 ARCHEUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
24.3 BENCHMARK ASSET MANAGEMENT – UK
24.4 CAPITALWORKS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC
24.5 CMG-CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
24.6 DIRECTORS FINANCIAL GROUP LTD
24.7 ENDEAVOUR FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED
24.8 GLOBAL CROWN CAPITAL LLC AND J&C GLOBAL SECURITIES INVESTMENTS LLC
24.9 GLG PARTNERS INC
24.10 INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES LLC
24.11 BRUMMER & PARTNERS
24.12 MANCHESTER TRADING LLC
24.13 MOTHERROCK LP
24.14 LANGLEY CAPITAL LLC
24.15 RCG CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
24.16 SAMARITAN ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
24.17 SEAFORTH MERIDIAN ADVISORS LLC
24.18 PLUSFUNDS GROUP INC
24.19 SPINNER ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
24.20 VIPER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC AND COMPASS FUND MANAGEMENT LLC
Chapter 25: Cases Studies 2007
25.1 ABSOLUTE CAPITAL GROUP LTD
25.2 ABSOLUTE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LTD
25.3 ARAGON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
25.4 AXA INVESTMENT MANAGERS INC
25.5 BASIS CAPITAL FUNDS MANAGEMENT LTD
25.6 BEACON ROCK CAPITAL, LLC
25.7 BEAR STEARNS ASSET MANAGEMENT INC
25.8 CAMBRIDGE PLACE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLP
25.9 CHEYNE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (UK) LLP
25.10 CLARION MANAGEMENT LLC
25.11 COOPER HILL PARTNERS LLC
25.12 DSJ INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES LTD (CHELSEY CAPITAL)
25.13 EVERCREST CAPITAL (PTY) LTD
25.14 FORSYTH PARTNERS LTD
25.15 BRADDOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
25.16 GERONIMO FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
25.17 GOLDLINK CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED
25.18 CARIBBEAN COMMODITIES LTD
25.19 HAIDAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
25.20 LAKE SHORE ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD
25.21 LYDIA CAPITAL LLC
25.22 BEAR STEARNS & CO INC
25.23 MDL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
25.24 MERCURIUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
25.25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
25.26 ODDO AND CIE/ODDO ASSET MANAGEMENT
25.27 EIGER CAPITAL LIMITED
25.28 SACHSEN LB
25.29 BNP PARIBAS SA
25.30 PIRATE CAPITAL LLC
25.31 QUATTRO GLOBAL CAPITAL LLC
25.32 IKB CREDIT ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH
25.33 RITCHIE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
25.34 RUBICON FUND MANAGEMENT LLP
25.35 SENTINEL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
25.36 SOWOOD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
25.37 STRATIX ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
25.38 SYNAPSE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLP
25.39 TPG-AXON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
25.40 TRIBECA GLOBAL MANAGEMENT LLC
25.41 DILLON READ CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
25.42 UBS SECURITIES LLC
25.43 UNION INVESTMENT ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING AG
25.44 UNITED CAPITAL MARKETS HOLDINGS INC
25.45 WHARTON ASSET MANAGEMENT GB LTD
Chapter 26: Case Studies 2008
26.1 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC MAT/ASTA FUNDS
26.2 GABRIEL CAPITAL CORPORATION
26.3 BLUE RIVER ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
26.4 BLUEBAY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLC
26.5 CARLYLE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
26.6 CENTAURUS CAPITAL LTD
26.7 1861 CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.8 ANDOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.9 CERES CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
26.10 CITADEL LLC
26.11 COADUM ADVISERS INC & MANSELL CAPITAL PARTNERS III LLC
26.12 CORNERSTONE QUANTITATIVE INVESTMENT GROUP INC
26.13 CITIGROUP CAPITAL MARKETS INC – CSO PARTNERS FUND
26.14 DALTON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP LLP
26.15 D.B. ZWIRN & CO. L.P.
26.16 DEEPHAVEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC AND KNIGHT CAPITAL GROUP
26.17 DRAKE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.18 DREIER LLP
26.19 ENDEAVOUR CAPITAL LLP
26.20 EPIC CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
26.21 DELTAONE CAPITAL PARTNERS CORP
26.22 CITIGROUP ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS LLC
26.23 FAIRFIELD GREENWICH ADVISORS LLC
26.24 FOCUS CAPITAL INVESTORS LLC
26.25 FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
26.26 FRONT STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION
26.27 GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES (GO) CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT B.V.
26.28 BARCLAYS BANK PLC
26.29 GORDIAN KNOT LTD
26.30 GRADIENT CAPITAL PARTNERS LLP
26.31 HEADSTART ADVISERS LIMITED
26.32 HERITAGE WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC
26.33 HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
26.34 ING (NZ) LIMITED
26.35 INSANA CAPITAL PARTNERS LP
26.36 LAHDE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.37 LAWRENCE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP
26.38 LIBERTYVIEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
26.39 LONDON DIVERSIFIED FUND MANAGEMENT LLP
26.40 UBS THIRD PARTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY S.A. AND ACCESS PARTNERS S.A.
26.41 TREMONT GROUP HOLDINGS INC
26.42 BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC
26.43 KINGATE MANAGEMENT LTD
26.44 MANHASSET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.45 MAXAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.46 MKM LONGBOAT CAPITAL ADVISORS LLP
26.47 MORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT INC
26.48 OAK GROUP INC
26.49 OKUMUS CAPITAL LLC
26.50 CITIGROUP INC – OLD LANE PARTNERS LP
26.51 BANCO SANTANDER SA
26.52 ORE HILL PARTNERS LLC
26.53 OSPRAIE MANAGEMENT LLC
26.54 PARDUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
26.55 PARKCENTRAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
26.56 PELOTON PARTNERS LLP
26.57 PENTAGON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PLC
26.58 PLATINUM GROVE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP
26.59 POLAR CAPITAL LLP
26.60 POLYGON INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLP
26.61 POWE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLP
26.62 QUANTEK ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
26.63 REGAN & COMPANY
26.64 ROCKWATER MUNICIPAL ADVISORS LLC
26.65 DEUTSCHE BANK AG
26.66 RUMSON CAPITAL LLC
26.67 RUSSELL CAPITAL INC
26.68 WINDMILL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.69 SAILFISH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
26.70 SALIDA CAPITAL LP
26.71 SATELLITE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP
26.72 SEXTANT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
26.73 STANDARD BANK PLC
26.74 STONE & YOUNGBERG LLC
26.75 GALLOWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
26.76 TANTALLON CAPITAL ADVISORS PTE LTD
26.77 TEQUESTA CAPITAL ADVISORS LP
26.78 TOSCAFUND ASSET MANAGEMENT LLP
26.79 JO HAMBRO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LTD
26.80 TURNBERRY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
26.81 FIRST REPUBLIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC
26.82 WEBB ASSET MANAGEMENT CANADA INC
Chapter 27: Case Studies 2009
27.1 SCOOP MANAGEMENT INC & SCOOP CAPITAL LLC
27.2 ASENQUA INC
27.3 ASTARRA ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
27.4 ATTICUS CAPITAL
27.5 AUSTIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LTD
27.6 ACORN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
27.7 BOSTON PROVIDENT LP
27.8 CHAIS 1991 FAMILY TRUST
27.9 CEREBRUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
27.10 COHMAD SECURITIES CORPORATION
27.11 CRW MANAGEMENT LP
27.12 DYNAMIC DECISIONS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LTD
27.13 EVERGREEN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
27.14 FINVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
27.15 GALLEON MANAGEMENT LP
27.16 HFV ASSET MANAGEMENT LP
27.17 JADIS INVESTMENTS LLC
27.18 JWM PARTNERS LLC
27.19 K1 FONDS GBR
27.20 LANCELOT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
27.21 LOCKE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
27.22 LODGE CAPITAL GROUP LLC
27.23 M.A.G. CAPITAL LLC
27.24 NEW CASTLE FUNDS, LLC
27.25 NEW STAR ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP PLC
27.26 NORTHERN RIVERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
27.27 NYLON CAPITAL LLP
27.28 NORTH HILLS MANAGEMENT LLC
27.29 ONYX CAPITAL LLC
27.30 CROSSROAD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
27.31 PEQUOT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
27.32 PONTA NEGRA GROUP LLC
27.33 RAPTOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
27.34 RCS HEDGE FUND
27.35 RUDERMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
27.36 SAND DOLLAR INVESTING PARTNERS LLC
27.37 SNC ASSET MANAGEMENT INC
27.38 SOLARIS MANAGEMENT LLC
27.39 3V CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
27.40 WEAVERING CAPITAL (UK) LTD
27.41 WEST END CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC & WEST END FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLC
27.42 WESTGATE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
27.43 WESTRIDGE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
27.44 S2 CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
Chapter 28: Case Studies 2010
28.1 CAMULOS CAPITAL LP
28.2 DIAMONDBACK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
28.3 EASY EQUITY ASSET MANAGEMENT INC
28.4 EBULLIO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLP
28.5 FRONTPOINT PARTNERS LLC
28.6 GARTMORE GROUP PLC
28.7 GEM CAPITAL LLC
28.8 GLOBAL HOLDINGS LLC
28.9 GRIFPHON ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC AND SASQUATCH CAPITAL LLC
28.10 GSC GROUP INC AND J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
28.11 CHIMAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC
28.12 HORSEMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
28.13 IMPERIUM INVESTMENT ADVISORS LLC
28.14 LANEXA MANAGEMENT LLC
28.15 LIFE'S GOOD INC
28.16 ONYX CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
28.17 PEF ADVISORS LLC
28.18 GARCIA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
28.19 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO
28.20 PLAINFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
28.21 SOUTHRIDGE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
28.22 THINKSTRATEGY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC/LILABOC LLC
28.23 COWEN GROUP INC
Chapter 29: Case Studies 2011
29.1 AXA ROSENBERG INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
29.2 BARAI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
29.3 BAYSTAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
29.4 BENCHMARK ASSET MANAGERS LLC, AND HARVEST MANAGERS LLC
29.5 360 GLOBAL CAPITAL LLC
29.6 AETHRA ASSET MANAGEMENT B.V.
29.7 3 DEGREES ASSET MANAGEMENT PTE LTD
29.8 FLETCHER ASSET MANAGEMENT INC
29.9 DUMA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC AND DUMA CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
29.10 HARBINGER CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
29.11 ALNBRI MANAGEMENT, LLC & MANAGED ACCOUNTS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
29.12 IU GROUP INC
29.13 JAMES CAIRD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLP
29.14 JUNO MOTHER EARTH ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
29.15 KOMODO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PTE LTD
29.16 LEADDOG CAPITAL MARKETS LLC
29.17 LIQUID CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
29.18 LOCUST OFFSHORE MANAGEMENT, LLC
29.19 LONGACRE FUND MANAGEMENT LLC
29.20 MICHAEL KENWOOD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
29.21 MILLENNIUM GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LTD
29.22 NEURAL MARKETS LLC
29.23 NEW CENTURY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
29.24 O.S.S. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
29.25 PAULSON & CO INC
29.26 PEGASUS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
29.27 RAB CAPITAL LTD
29.28 SEATOWN HOLDINGS PTE
29.29 SHK ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
29.30 SJK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
29.31 SPENCER HOUSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLP
29.32 TASK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, ARM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC & VIGILANT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
29.33 TONTINE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
29.34 TRAFALGAR ASSET MANAGERS LIMITED
29.35 VANQUISH CAPITAL GROUP LLC
29.36 WCM CAPITAL INC
29.37 WESSEX ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Chapter 30: Case Studies 2012
30.1 ABANTE CAPITAL (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED AND BASILEUS CAPITAL (PTY) LTD
30.2 TELL INVESTMENTS LLP
30.3 TIG ADVISORS LLC
30.4 TRADEWINDS GLOBAL INVESTORS LLC
30.5 VORAS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
30.6 BLUEGOLD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLP
30.7 THADDEUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (HK) LIMITED
30.8 BRICKELL FUND LLC
30.9 ALETHEIA RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT INC
Appendix A: Index of Case Studies by Investment Manager
Appendix B: UK Serious Fraud Office Hedge Fund Investor Questionnaire
Index
List of Funds
List of Fund Managers
End User License Agreement
ii
v
vi
xliii
xliv
xlv
xlvii
xlix
li
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Chapter 2: Defining Operational Issues
Table 2.1 A taxonomy of fraud in alternative investments
Chapter 9: Fund Assets
Table 9.1 Segregation of fair value responsibilities
Table 9.2 Comparison of AIMA recommendations with IOSC Principles
Chapter 12: Regulatory Actions, Politics and Market Confidence
Table 12.1 Ten most common complaints during FY 2010
Table 12.2 Ten most common complaints
Chapter 15: Risk Ratings and Scoring
Table 15.1 Key functions and processes for each individual (i.e. What do they do, why would it matter if they didn't do it and how would you know?).
Table 15.2 Generic departmental risks (i.e. What are they and how are they covered?).
Table 15.3 Hedge fund scoring template
Table 15.4 Prime brokerage scoring template
Table 15.5 Liquidity profile scoring template
Table 15.6 Auditors scoring template
Table 15.7 Regulatory issues scoring template
Table 15.8 Transparency scoring template
Table 15.9 Fund management scoring template
Table 15.10 Contractual arrangements scoring template
Table 15.11 Operational controls risk escalation and segregation scoring template
Table 15.12 Cash and trading controls scoring template
Table 15.13 Operational staff quality and manager background scoring template
Table 15.14 Service providers scoring template
Table 15.15 Insurance arrangements scoring template
Table 15.16 Disaster recovery arrangements scoring template
Table 15.17 Investor profile and concentration scoring template
Table 15.18 Scoring template for overall view
Chapter 17: Case Studies Pre-2000
Table 17.1 Comparison of LTCM's leverage to major securities and future firms
Chapter 26: Case Studies 2008
Table 26.1 The Global Energy Fund performance
Chapter 29: Case Studies 2011
Table 29.1 Terms for investors in Rivulet Capital
Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons is the oldest independent publishing company in the United States. With offices in North America, Europe, Australia and Asia, Wiley is globally committed to developing and marketing print and electronic products and services for our customers’ professional and personal knowledge and understanding.
The Wiley Finance series contains books written specifically for finance and investment professionals as well as sophisticated individual investors and their financial advisors. Book topics range from portfolio management to e-commerce, risk management, financial engineering, valuation and financial instrument analysis, as well as much more.
For a list of available titles, visit our Web site at www.WileyFinance.com.
RAJIV JAITLY
This edition first published 2016
© 2016 John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Registered office
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please visit our website at www.wiley.com.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is Available
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
ISBN 978-1-119-01875-9 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-119-01873-5 (ePDF)
ISBN 978-1-119-01874-2 (ePub) ISBN 978-1-119-01872-8 (obk)
Cover Design: Wiley
Top Image: © wrangler/Shutterstock
Bottom Image: © JetKat/Shutterstock
ToMum & DadandRahul & Anuradha
Pray to God sailor, but row for the shore.
—nautical proverb
In the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer than the windshield
.
–Warren Buffet
We all talk about blow-ups in the world of hedge funds. Indeed, it is a word that strikes fear in the heart of any due diligence professional. Yet it is a loose term which means different things to different people.
To some it may be catastrophic losses from a trade, to others an inability to make a strategy viable. Often it may be a failure to recover from cumulative or even one-off trading losses. It may be caused by operational failure, the unexpected loss of key staff or a service provider failing. Frequently it is the impact of leverage, or sometimes because fraudulent activity is exposed.
This book is an attempt to consolidate collective experience on issues that arise in hedge fund due diligence and covers more than just “blow-ups”, as it is intended to address structural issues and problems that may have been identifiable during the due diligence process and which investors should arguably have known about prior to investment. The book is based on the premise that often (but not always), most of the information to make due diligence judgements is available to investors who are prepared to do the work – particularly institutional investors – but factors such as career risk, remuneration policies and governance practices mean that the realities of the risks and dangers may be ignored. This can make it difficult to challenge views which are sometimes no more than “received wisdom” against the probabilities of a problem occurring around an identified issue. When issues cannot be challenged and addressed openly then in such an environment the fable of the emperor's new clothes is likely to flourish – such as in the case of Madoff, where the issues and risks were arguably well known to many investors but where few dared to challenge the status quo and point out that the emperor had no new clothes.
It is of course much easier to apply the benefits of hindsight to problems that have eventually transpired, but this book's contention is that even though there are cases where it would have been difficult if not impossible to identify potential failure or problems, it is often the case that some, if not all, the signals to pay attention to were available prior to the making of investment decisions in many instances, and that these were more often than not ignored. In order to learn from those experiences, applying hindsight is no bad thing – particularly where it is clear that the evidence would have been available to make the right judgement calls.
This book is not just about fraud but also includes situations – commercial and otherwise – that perfectly legitimate businesses have found themselves in. Some have managed to navigate through them and come out at the other end having survived either in their original form or through a change in shape and direction. Others have had to close and exit from the business. The focus of the book is to use these situations as case studies for what the due diligence teams should have been able to identify. It is also important to acknowledge why in some cases it would not have been possible to do anything. The book also tries to assess what impact each set of circumstances had. Failures of investment strategies and the inability to raise capital are also discussed in terms of their operational impact. Some case studies have little or no information about them but appear nonetheless because they are examples of businesses that started and closed in short order. Many have similar themes.
The case studies also include plenty of examples of fraud. No amount of due diligence is likely to prevent someone minded to commit fraud, and inevitably mistakes do get made. But if investors are prepared to invest resource in due diligence functions and, more importantly, pay attention to what they unearth, then it should be possible to recognise many of the indicators to avoid. Indeed, there are now consultants who are beginning to collate signals that may constitute red flags ahead of investment for precisely that reason. Of course, some of the problems cited may be evident in many hedge funds that continue to operate and generate returns for their investors today, such as in relation to some of the conflict of interest issues raised here. However, in these circumstances, I would argue that investors have either had to invest blindly or by taking a leap of faith. I believe that there should be very little justification for investments – particularly by institutional investors responsible for managing the money of others – to proceed in this way.
Analysing what we know of problems linked to hedge funds, it is often possible to identify some basic steps that investors might have taken in their due diligence to avoid the issues they were confronted with. Many funds of hedge funds in the early 2000s made much of their due diligence processes to explain why they had avoided investing in Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) – one of the first of the “too big to fail” blow-ups. Some failures such as Madoff are simpler to classify as failures of investor due diligence. Any analysis also needs to take into account how markets and market practice have evolved as only 10 years after LTCM, Amaranth's problems barely caused a ripple in the market.
As an insolvency practitioner I have been lucky during the course of my working life to work in one form or another on some of the major failures arising from or resulting in insolvencies in the UK. The exposure I had in the 80s and 90s to companies such as Polly Peck, BCCI, Maxwell Communications and Frazer Nash, to name a few, provided the best possible training grounds for the direction my career eventually took, giving me a ringside seat in the world of hedge funds, where I have worked since 2000 and where I have even had the opportunity to deal with some of those who feature in this book. In writing a book such as this I have had to tread a fine line to ensure that the access I had to highly sensitive information was respected and I have therefore restricted the analysis to just those matters that can be easily accessed from information found in the public domain such as on the internet. I have been mindful of the fact that a lot of information continues to remain behind closed doors. This has meant that some of the analysis is limited, but I hope it will still shed light on the possible approaches one might choose to adopt on what was publicly available.
I am also conscious that many names of managers mentioned in the context of a book such as this may view their inclusion as being unfair or pejorative because they continue to be successful businesses where investors remain invested – but the case studies have been chosen because the problems faced by the hedge funds managed by these managers were the subject of press comment at the time, and, in some cases, caused investors problems because of a wide range of issues including trading losses, structural problems such as key man risk, client redemptions, insolvency and formal regulatory actions which investors should, in many instances, have been able to identify prior to investment. Whilst there is always a risk that a manager views its inclusion as a case study pejoratively, I hope that the facts that I have accessed and analysed and drawn conclusions from will stand on their own. Ultimately the responsibility for including or excluding a name is dependent on the research I did and is mine alone.
The case studies in this book would not have been possible without the vast library that is the internet and all those who post information on it.
I have been immensely privileged to be involved in the industry that is the world of hedge funds. It is full of interesting people. But it is also a world populated by some people prepared to take shortcuts in the name of expediency, where nothing is necessarily ever quite as it seems and where the stakes can be immensely high.
It is for those whose job it is to conduct operational due diligence on funds and who are responsible for verifying the claims of others and identifying potential problems for which they may even eventually be held responsible, that this book has been written. The consequences for them of the problems that can arise can be significant. It would be good to think that this work might help to point them in the right direction and that they might be able to benefit from my experience.
There are far too many people to name individually who have contributed to the making of this book – whether through discussions on due diligence within my teams or in making investment decisions or indeed in arriving at practical solutions to problems. Without them there would be no experience to reflect in this book – and for that I am immensely grateful to all of them.
Finally, my thanks to Dr Chris Jones, who breathed life into this book through his introductions to John Wiley and to the Naked Short Club – a radio programme – which was to lead me to Matthias Knab, who very kindly reintroduced me to John Wiley and triggered this publication, and of course to Thomas Hyrkiel at John Wiley, who persevered with its publication.
Rajiv Jaitly is the managing partner at Jaitly LLP a consultancy that provides independent fund governance expertise and due diligence services to global clients. He set up and managed due diligence and investment management (middle and back office) operations for major groups of companies such as UBS, Santander and AXA. More recently he has also worked with the Regulatory Policy team of the UK Pensions Regulator advising on matters including asset protection, fund costs, employer covenants, capital adequacy and auto-enrolment for 2012. He was appointed an expert by the Office of Fair Trading in 2013 for its market study on defined contribution pensions. He was also commissioned by the UK Financial Services Consumer Panel to write a report on fund costs, which was published in November 2014.
While the author has used his reasonable efforts in preparing this book, he makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaims any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be appropriate for your particular circumstances or for the legal environment within which you operate and it does not constitute legal, financial or investment advice.
Whilst the author has used his reasonable endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the material as described herein at the time of writing this, the author is not responsible for checking the up-to-date position of the law, technical matters or facts relating to situations discussed in the book after the date of writing.
The rules and regulations relating to matters discussed in the book are continuously evolving and other subsequent events may have occurred on the case studies discussed such as further developments on the case law referred to, which may not be publicly available or has occurred since the time of writing. Many of the matters discussed in the book are based on internet research that was accessible without registration and which was not behind paywalls. No warranties are given on the accuracy, completeness or up-to-date position of the material accessed and no liability is accepted to any party for the discussions in relation to such material. The material by its very nature is difficult to verify and is based on reports and papers published on the internet and because of the changing nature of the internet no warranties can be given that URLs or other references and contents therein remain accurate or continue to be maintained or remain accessible.
This book is designed to assess the impact of those reports and papers for due diligence professionals by presenting the author's views on reported matters and processes. You should always consult with a professional who understands your circumstances and the up-to-date position relating to applicable rules and regulations and technical matters prior to taking any action relating to matters discussed herein. Neither the author nor the publisher shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages including but not limited to any special, incidental, consequential, or other damages whatsoever or howsoever arising.
In the investment world, “I run a hedge fund” has the same meaning as “I'm a consultant” in the rest of the business world
.
1
Whenever I have interviewed staff for roles in operational risk and due diligence for alternative investments – one of the questions I tend to ask is “what is a hedge fund?” The responses in my view provide a good indication of the way someone approaches this industry and the range of answers has been a source of much discussion amongst members of my teams. It is not an easy question to answer and formal definitions are scarce.
Alternative investments themselves appear easy enough to identify by eliminating traditional investing but even here the boundaries continue to blur with 130/30 funds, REITs and the ability to use derivatives beyond just efficient portfolio management as regulators have come to accept the use of such instruments. The Alternative Investment Funds Directive (AIFMD) in Europe makes the definition even more interesting as possibly everything that is a collective investment but not an Undertaking in Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) is now likely to be an Alternative Investment Fund if it does not fall under one of the specified exemptions.
To quote Circuit Judge Randolph in Phillip Goldstein, et al v Securities and Exchange Commission: “‘Hedge funds’ are notoriously difficult to define. The term appears nowhere in the federal securities laws, and even industry participants do not agree upon a single definition.” He also refers to an SEC Roundtable on Hedge Funds in 2003 where David Vaughan, a partner in law firm Decherts, cited 14 different definitions for hedge funds found in government and industry publications. Referring to the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, Hedge Funds, Leverage and the Lessons of Long Term Capital Management (1999) he points out that “[t]he term is commonly used as a catch-all for ‘any pooled investment vehicle that is privately organised, administered by professional investment managers, and not widely available to the public.’”
Hedge funds are hard to pin down by definition but have some common characteristics:
The main vehicles/structures in which the investments are managed (funds) tend to be in a jurisdiction that is not the same as that of the investment manager – generally for tax, regulatory and disclosure reasons (although onshore hedge funds are getting more common in Europe and have always been common in the US, where the manager will often have an onshore and an offshore version of the funds).
The funds generally have a lighter form of regulatory overview and the investment managers are often subject to lighter regulatory regimes (although AIFMD has changed that in Europe as has the Dodd–Frank Act in the US).
The funds are able to use leverage which can be unlimited even though the manager may indicate the level of leverage they expect to employ in the prospectus.
There is little prescription on the form that the offering documents for the fund need to take, the types of disclosure required in them and the nature of reporting to investors.
There is minimal proscription on the types of investment activity and instruments that the manager can use or enter into on behalf of the fund unless restrictions are voluntarily adopted in the fund documents or rules that arise from a listing need to be complied with.
A number of the significant operational activities such as trade settlement, administration, transfer agency and custody are outsourced to third parties who may themselves be in another jurisdiction.
These funds are not generally available to the investing public and there are generally qualification requirements in respect of nationality and types of investors including investor sophistication and knowledge (ironically, often measured by the amount of wealth the investor has).
There is an assumption of
caveat emptor
when investing in these funds as it is assumed that the investor has done its homework prior to investing and these investments are for institutional and very wealthy investors who generally hold non-voting preferential interests in the fund.
The focus of the investment manager of the fund is normally to preserve capital and to try to achieve absolute returns for their investors rather than returns relative to an index.
The manager is usually remunerated for its efforts by a fixed fee with reference to the assets being managed and a variable fee with reference to the returns it is able to generate.
The governance of the fund is generally determined and controlled for all practical purposes by the investment manager to the fund, e.g. through the use of management shares which retain the voting rights in the fund for most things other than adverse changes to the investor's rights.
The risks of investing in these funds – apart from the investment risks themselves – are driven primarily by the structure of the fund, its service providers and the contracts with these third parties for services, the manner and extent of control over investments, the independence of governance and the nature of the instruments and the manner in which they are used. Fraud can also be an issue, but the chances of detecting fraud (as opposed to its indicators) are, in my view, low in any due diligence review. In relation to fraud the best one can expect to do is identify those environments in which fraud is possible and seek to avoid or control them. But for the investor, in the absence of fraud, the main impact hedge fund risks have on the safety of their investment can be summed up simply into:
asset loss/investment risks – whether through leverage, trading bets, concentration, market events;
liquidity and exit risks;
valuation risks; and
reporting risks.
Operational risk in a hedge fund context has been evolving as a concept and different people have different views on what it means. Even looking at the books currently available on the subject, the approaches differ, emphasising the backgrounds of the authors – whether it be a quantitative modelling approach or one that emphasises background research. For the purposes of this book, operational risk covers all those risks that are not investment risks and this defines the scope of the due diligence requirements discussed in this work. Some risks arguably are both operational and investment risks – leverage, liquidity, concentration risk and counterparty risk are some examples – but the focus of the investment professional is different to that of the operational risk professional, even in these areas of overlap, and therefore in my view merits discussion. In any event operational due diligence cannot be done in isolation of the investment due diligence. The two should be done in tandem if they are to be effective.
These characteristics make operational risk and the operational due diligence process an essential element of investing in alternative investment funds.
Although this book focuses on hedge funds, its application to other alternative investment funds is not significantly different because the principles do not differ, except perhaps in minor detail and regulatory focus.
A lot of empirical research appears to suggest that active investment management rarely beats the market. So why bother? I am no expert in this area, but sophisticated investors consider hedge funds for the following reasons:
Alternative investment funds tend to operate on a tax-neutral basis, which makes them attractive to investors to maximise tax planning opportunities.
A lot of investment talent in the industry has moved to the world of alternative fund investment and this is one of the ways to tap into that talent.
These investments provide a degree of diversification.
Research suggests that although the main driver of returns is asset allocation strategy; investors who understand this and can identify the right alternative investment funds for their time horizons can benefit from such investments.
Alternative investment funds focus on capital preservation and absolute returns – theoretically this means that a manager can go to cash if they are not comfortable with the investment environment.
Although leverage can magnify the risks of loss, such investments give the opportunity to get leveraged exposure, thereby increasing the return (and of course loss) potential.
It is argued that the manager and investor's interests are more greatly aligned through the fee structure and level of investment by the manager in the fund.
It therefore seems clear that there is a place for hedge funds and alternative investments in the market and that as these products evolve, due diligence processes need to evolve to enable investors to take sensible decisions in the light of the risks that they identify and assess. This makes understanding some of the structural and operational issues of previous due diligence exercises important.
1
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/what-is-a-hedge-fund.html
. This material is reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
It's fine to celebrate success but it is more important to heed the lessons of failure
.
– Bill Gates
Whenever an investor asks an investment manager if they have been involved in a failure or “blow-up” you can palpably sense the eyes glazing over. I have heard of some interesting justifications as to why the existence of a particular fund in a portfolio or a particular matter did not constitute a blow-up and therefore did not require disclosure to an investor or adviser asking the question. The problem in part is created by the vagueness of the term itself – everyone thinks they know what a blow-up is and generally it is never something they have been involved in!
Vagueness can be a problem in due diligence. It often means that the question and answer relate to different interpretations. Precision is boring but necessary to ensure that the right question has been asked in order to get the required accurate answer.
A CRS Report for Congress on Hedge Fund Failures in December 20061 cited a study which classified hedge fund failures into three broad categories:
financial issues;
operational issues; and
fraud.
But a blow-up from an investor's perspective is usually two-dimensional – it is either because the investor has suffered an investment loss or is unable to get their money out of a fund when they want to, having suffered such a loss. The reasons for this may be investment-related or operational. This book primarily deals with those issues that would be operational. I say primarily, because of the overlaps that inevitably exist.
The analysis needs to be about whether an investor has done enough to address the probabilities of these two dimensions arising prior to making an investment. If they have not, then it is my contention that in a number of (but not all) cases they are unlikely to have covered all the areas that are the subject matter of this book in making an investment decision or have ignored the signs that the work may have uncovered. These are the real issues this book addresses – the funds themselves simply present the symptoms to study.
How these two dimensions play out is a function of some more nuances. For our purposes let us try to tie this down.
Operational issues in a hedge fund context arise in respect of these two dimensions from circumstances such as:
accusations of fraud;
insolvency and winding up proceedings;
investment losses that exceed the fund's “normal” “volatility range”;
operational problems and structural issues including fund defaults and material breaches of contract, leading to significant investor withdrawals, imposition of gates, suspension of redemptions or fund closure (which could be from a failure to raise capital or the loss of a key man); and
regulatory intervention resulting in a settlement or fine or fund closure.
Significant withdrawals of funds by investors mean different things to different people – whether it should be defined depends on the effect those withdrawals have.
It is perhaps worth making one statement as an overarching principle for all due diligence – whatever kind it may be and in whatever context it is applied to in this book:
If it sounds too good to be true, it generally is.
Fraud is a type of criminal activity, defined as “intentional deception to obtain an advantage, avoid an obligation or cause loss to another person or company”
.
– Serious Fraud Office website, United Kingdom
Perhaps the most damning finding of the survey is that initial red flags are now raised more frequently than ever before, yet responses to these early warning signs have fallen significantly. Every ignored red flag is potentially a missed opportunity to stop fraud
.
– KPMG Survey June 2011, Who is the typical fraudster?
Fraud is not as simple as it may first sound, as it can take a number of forms, for example:
deception in the provision of information and results – misrepresentation;
deception in the purpose for which funds are used – misappropriation;
failure to disclose information; and
abuse of position.
The United Kingdom Serious Fraud Office (SFO) have developed an interesting taxonomy of fraud which splits fraud into seven areas.2 This taxonomy can be adapted to analyse the types of fraud that we see in the world of hedge funds by reducing it to three broad areas – fraud linked to an individual, fraud through a corporate shell conducted by a group of people acting together and market abuse. Each of these can be further categorised depending on the nature of the fraud in order to assist analysis (Table 2.1). Where the founder of an organisation has had allegations of fraud levelled at them resulting in the demise of the fund, this would be classified as corporate fraud even though there may be a number of innocent employees, because the corporate structure can facilitate the fraud.
Table 2.1 A taxonomy of fraud in alternative investments
1. Individual Fraud
committed by an individual
Theft
Deception
False accounting
Abuse of position of trust
Manipulation of information
Exploiting assets and information
Pyramid or Ponzi schemes
Insolvency/bankruptcy-related frauds
PR theft
False claims
Failures to disclose
Corruption and bribery
Tax, public funding and grants fraud
2. Corporate Fraud
