PREFACE
This
book is designed to set forth the main principles of effective
platform delivery, and to provide a large body of material for
student practice. The work laid out may be used to form a separate
course of study, or a course of training running parallel with a
course in debating or other original speaking. It has been prepared
with a view also to that large number who want to speak, or have to
speak, but cannot have the advantage of a teacher. Much is therefore
said in the way of caution, and untechnical language is used
throughout.The
discussion of principles in Part One is intended as a help towards
the student's understanding of his task, and also as a common basis
of criticism in the relation between teacher and pupil. The
preliminary fundamental work of Part Two, Technical Training, deals
first with the right formation of tone, the development of voice as
such, the securing of a fixed right vocal habit. Following comes the
adapting of this improved voice to the varieties of use, or
expressional effect, demanded of the public speaker. After this
critical detailed drill, the student is to take the platform, and
apply his acquired technique to continued discourse, receiving
criticism after each entire piece of work.The
question as to what should be the plan and the content of Part Three,
Platform Practice, has been determined simply by asking what are the
distinctly varied conditions under which men most frequently speak.
It is regarded as profitable for the student to practice, at least to
some extent, in all the several kinds of speech here chosen. In thus
cultivating versatility, he will greatly enlarge his power of
expression, and will, at length, discover wherein lies his own
special capability.The
principal aim in choosing the selections has been to have them
sufficiently alive to be attractive to younger speakers, and not so
heavy as to be unsuited to their powers. Some of them have proved
effective by use; many others are new. In all cases they are of good
quality.It
is hoped that the new features of the book will be found useful. One
of these is a group of lighter after-dinner speeches and anecdotes.
It has been said that, in present-day speech-making, humor has
supplanted former-day eloquence. It plays anyway a considerable part
in various kinds of speaking. The young speaker is generally
ineffective in the expression of pleasantry, even his own. Practice
in the speaking of wholesome humor is good for cultivating quality of
voice and ease of manner, and for developing the faculty of giving
humorous turn to one's own thought. It is also entertaining to fellow
students. Other new features in the book are a practice section for
the kind of informal speaking suited to the club or the classroom,
and a section given to the occasional poem, the kind of poem that is
associated with speech- making.A
considerable space is given to argumentative selections because of
the general interest in debating, and because a need has been felt
for something suited for special forensic practice among students of
law. Some poetic selections are introduced into Part Two in order to
give attractive variety to the student's work, and to provide for the
advantage of using verse form in some of the vocal training. The few
character sketches introduced may serve for cultivating facility in
giving entertaining touches to serious discourse. All the selections
for platform practice are designed, as seems most fitting, to occupy
about five minutes in delivery. Original speeches, wherein the
student presents his own thought, may be intermingled with this more
technical work in delivery, or may be taken up in a more special way
in a subsequent course.It
should, perhaps, be suggested that the plan of procedure here
prescribed can be modified to suit the individual teacher or student.
The method of advance explained in the Discussion of Principles is
believed to be the best, but some who use the book may prefer, for
example, to begin with the second group of selections, the familiar,
colloquial passages, and proceed from these to those more elevated
and sustained. This or any other variation from the plan here
proposed can, of course, be adopted. For any plan the variety of
material is deemed sufficient, and the method of grouping will be
found convenient and practical.The
making of this kind of book would not be possible except for the
generous privileges granted by many authors and many publishers of
copyrighted works. For the special courtesies of all whose writings
have a place here the editor would make the fullest acknowledgment of
indebtedness. The books from which extracts are taken have been
mentioned, in every case, in a prominent place with the title of the
selection, in order that so far as possible students may be led
carefully to read the entire original, and become fully imbued with
its meaning and spirit, before undertaking the vocal work on the
selected portion. For the purpose of such reading, it would be well
to have these books collected on a section of shelves in school
libraries for easy and ready reference.The
publishers from whose books selections have been most liberally drawn
are, Messrs. Houghton Mifflin Company, Messrs. Lothrop, Lee and
Shepard, Messrs. Little, Brown, and Company, of Boston, and Messrs.
Harper and Brothers, Messrs. Charles Scribner's Sons, Messrs. G. P.
Putnam's Sons, Messrs. G. W. Dillingham Company, Messrs. Doubleday,
Page and Company, and Mr. C. P. Farrell, New York. Several of the
after-dinner speeches are taken from the excellent fifteen volume
collection, "Modern Eloquence," by an arrangement with Geo.
L. Shuman and Company, Chicago, publishers. In the first three
volumes of this collection will be found many other attractive
after-dinner speeches.I.
L. W. CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS.
INTRODUCTION
Happily,
it is no longer necessary to argue that public speaking is a worthy
subject for regular study in school and college. The teaching of this
subject, in one form or another, is now fairly well established. In
each of the larger universities, including professional schools and
summer schools, the students electing the courses in speaking number
well into the hundreds. These courses are now being more generally
placed among those counted towards the academic degrees. The demand
for trained teachers in the various branches of the work in schools
and colleges is far above the present supply. Educators in general
look with more favor upon this kind of instruction, recognizing its
practical usefulness and its cultural value. The question of the
present time, then, is not whether or not the subject shall have a
place. Some sort of place it always has had and always will have.
Present discussion should rather bear upon the policy and the method
of that instruction, the qualifications to be required of teachers,
and the consideration for themselves and their work that teachers
have a right to expect.Naturally,
public speaking in the form of debating has received favor among
educators. It seems to serve the ends of practice in speaking and it
gives also good mental discipline. The high regard for debating is
not misplaced. We can hardly overestimate the good that debating has
done to the subject of speaking in the schools and colleges. The
rigid intellectual discipline involved in debating has helped to
establish public speaking in the regular curriculum, thus gaining for
it, and for teachers in it, greater respect. To bring training in
speech into close relation with training in thought, and with the
study of expression in English, is most desirable. This, however,
does not
mean that training in speech, as a distinct object in itself, should
be allowed to fall into comparative neglect. It is quite possible
that, along with the healthy disapproval of false elocution and
meaningless declamation, may come an underestimation of the important
place of a right kind and a due degree of technical training in voice
and general form.In
a recent book on public speaking, the statement is made that it is
all well enough, if it so happens, for a speaker to have a pleasing
voice, but it is not essential. This, though true in a sense, is
misleading, and much teaching of this sort would be unfortunate for
young speakers. It would seem quite unnecessary to say that beauty of
voice is not in itself a primary object in vocal training for public
speaking. The object is to make voices effective. In the effective
use of any other instrument, we apply the utmost skill for the
perfect adjustment or coordination of all the means of control. We do
this for the attainment of power, for the conserving of energy, for
the insuring of endurance and ease of operation. This is the end in
the training of the voice. It is to avoid friction. It is to prevent
nervous strain, muscular distortion, and failing power, and to secure
easy response to the will of the speaker. The point not wholly
understood or heeded is that, as a rule, the unpleasing voice is an
indication of ill adjustment and friction. It denotes a mechanism
wearing on itself—it means a voice that will weaken or fail before
its time—a voice that needs repair.Since
speech is to express a speaker's thought, training in speech should
not be altogether dissociated from training in thinking. It ought to
go hand in hand, indeed, with the study of English, from first to
last. But training in voice and in the method of speech is a
technical matter. It ought not to be left to the haphazard treatment,
the intense spurring on, of vocally unskilled coaches for speaking
contests. Discussions about the teaching of speaking are often very
curious. We are frequently told by what means a few great orators
have succeeded, but we are hardly ever informed of the causes from
which many other speakers have been embarrassed or have failed. A
book or essay is written to prove, from the individual experience of
the author, the infallibility of a method. He was able to succeed,
the argument runs, only by this or that means; therefore all should
do as he did. It seems very plausible and attractive to read, for
instance, that to succeed in speaking, it is only necessary to plunge
in and be in earnest. But another writer points out that this is
quite absurd; that many poor speakers have not lacked in intense
earnestness and sincerity; that it isn't feeling or intense spirit
alone that insures success, but it is the attainment as well of a
vocal method. Yet he goes on to argue that this vocal method, this
forming of a public speaking voice and style, cannot be rightly
gained from the teachers; it must be acquired through the exercise of
each man's own will; if a man finds he is going wrong he must will to
go right—as if many men had not persistently but unsuccessfully
exercised their will to this very end. It is so easy, and so
attractive, to resolve all problems into one idea. President Woodrow
Wilson, of Princeton University, once said that he always avoided the
man or the book that proclaimed one idea for the correcting of
society's ills. These ideas on which books or essays are written are
too obviously fallacious to need extended comment; the wonder is that
they are often quoted and commended as being beneficial in their
teaching. If we want to row or sprint or play golf, we do not simply
go in and do our utmost; we apply the best technical skill to the
art; we seek to learn how, from the experience of the past, and
through the best instructors obtainable. Both common sense and
experience show that the use of the human voice in the art of
speaking is not the one thing, among all things, that cannot be
successfully taught. The results of vocal teaching show, on the
contrary, from multitudes of examples, from volumes of testimony,
that there are few branches of instruction wherein the specially
trained teacher is so much needed, and can be so effective as in the
art of speaking.In
an experience extending over many years, an experience dealing with
about all the various forms of public speaking and vocal teaching,
the present writer has tried many methods, conducted classes on
several different plans, learned the needs, observed the efforts,
considered the successes and failures, of many men and women of
various ages and of many callings. The constant and insistent fact in
all this period of experience has been that skillful, technical
instruction, as such, is the one kind of instruction that should
always be provided where public speaking is taught, and the one that
the student should not fail to secure when it is at hand. Other
elements in good speech-making may, if necessary, be obtained from
other sources. The teacher of speaking should teach speech. He should
teach something else also, but he should, as a technician, teach
that. The multitude of men and women who, in earlier and later life,
come, in vocal trouble, to seek help from the experienced teacher,
and the abundance of testimony as to the satisfactory results; the
repeated evidences of failure to produce rightly trained voices
wholly by so-called inspirational methods; the frequent evidences of
pernicious vocal results from the forcing of young voices in the
overintense and hasty efforts made in preparing for prize speaking,
acting, and debating,—all these may not come to the understanding
of the ordinary observer; they may not often, perhaps, come within
the experience of the exceptionally gifted individuals who are
usually cited as examples of distinguished success; they cannot
impress themselves on educators who have little or no relation with
this special subject; they naturally come into the knowledge and
experience of the specially trained teacher of public speaking, who
is brought into intimate relations with the subject and deals with
all sorts and conditions of men. Out of this experience comes the
strong conviction that the teacher of public speaking should be a
vocal technician and a vocal physician, able to teach constructively
and to treat correctively, knowing all he can of all that has been
taught before, but teaching only as much of what he knows as is
necessary to any individual.For
the dignity and worth of the teaching, the teacher of speaking should
be trained, and should be a trainer, as has been indirectly said, in
some other subject—in English literature or composition, in
debating, history, or what not. He should be one of the academic
faculty—concerned with thought, which speech expresses. He should
not, for his other subject, be mainly concerned with gymnastics or
athletics; he should not, for his own good and the consequent good of
his work, be wholly taken up merely with the teaching of technical
form in speaking. He should not be merely—if at all—a coach in
inter- collegiate contests; nor should his service to an institution
be adjudged mainly by the results of such contests. He should be an
independent, intellectually grown and growing man, one who—in his
exceptionally intimate relations with students—will have a large
and right influence on student life. The offer recently held out by a
university of a salary and an academic rank equal to its best, to a
sufficiently qualified instructor in public speaking, was one of the
several signs of a sure movement of to-day in the right direction—the
demand for a man of high character and broad culture, specially
skilled in the technical subject he was to teach, and the providing
of a worthy position.One
fact that needs to be impressed upon governing bodies of school and
college is that the cultivation of good speaking cannot but be
unsatisfactory when it is continued over only a very brief time. It
may only do mischief. A considerable period is necessary, as is the
case with other subjects, for reaching the student intelligence, for
molding the faculties, for maturing the powers, for adapting method
to the individual, and for bringing the personality out through the
method, so that method disappears. Senator George F. Hoar once gave
very sensible advice in an address to an audience of Harvard
students. He did not content himself with dwelling on the inevitable
platitude, first have something to say, and then say it; he said he
had been, in all his career, at a special disadvantage in public
speaking, from the want of early training in the use of his voice;
and he urged that students would do well not only to take advantage
of such training in college, but to have their teacher, if it were
possible, follow them, for a time, into their professional work. This
idea was well exemplified in the case of Phillips Brooks—a speaker
of spontaneity, simplicity, and splendid power. It is said that, in
the period of his pulpit work, in the midst of his absorbing church
labors, he made it a duty to go from time to time for a period of
work with his teacher of voice, that he might be kept from falling
back into wrong ways. It is often said that, if a man has it in him,
he will speak well anyway. It is emphatically the man who has it in
him, the man of intense temperament, like that of Phillips Brooks,
who most needs the balance wheel, the sure reliance, of technique.
That this technique should not be too technical; that form should not
be too formal; that teaching should not be too good, or do too much,
is one of the principles of good teaching. The point insisted on is
that a considerable time is needed, as it is in other kinds of
teaching, for thoroughly working out a few essential principles; for
overcoming a few obstinate faults; for securing matured results by
the right process of gradual development.There
is much cause for gratification in the evidences of a growing
appreciation, in all quarters, of the place due to spoken English, as
a study to be taught continuously side by side with written English.
Much progress has also been made toward making youthful platform
speaking, as well as youthful writing, more rational in form, more
true in spirit, more useful for its purpose. In good time written and
spoken English, conjoined with disciplinary training in thought and
imagination, will both become firmly established in their proper
place as subjects to be thoroughly and systematically taught. Good
teaching will become traditional, and good teachers not rare. And
among the specialized courses in public speaking an important place
should always be given to an exact training in voice and in the whole
art of effective delivery.
PART ONE
A
DISCUSSION OF PRINCIPLESTECHNICAL
TRAININGESTABLISHING
THE TONEThe
common trouble in using the voice for the more vigorous or intense
forms of speaking is a contraction or straining of the throat. This
impedes the free flow of voice, causing impaired tone, poor
enunciation, and unhealthy physical conditions. Students should,
therefore, be constantly warned against the least beginnings of this
fault. The earlier indications of it may not be observed, or the
nature of the trouble may not be known, by the untrained speaker. But
it ought to have, from the first, the attention of a skilled teacher,
for the more deep-seated it becomes, the harder is its cure. So very
common is the "throaty" tone and so connected is throat
pressure with every other vocal imperfection, that the avoiding or
the correcting of this one fault demands constant watchfulness in all
vigorous vocal work. The way to avoid the faulty control of voice is,
of course, to learn at the proper time the general principles of what
singers call voice production. These principles are few and, in a
sense, are very simple, but they are not easily made perfectly clear
in writing, and a perfect application of them, even in the simpler
forms of speaking, often requires persistent practice. It will be the
aim here to state only what the student is most likely to understand
and profit by, and to leave the rest to the personal guidance of a
teacher.The
control of the voice, so far as it can be a conscious physical
operation, is determined chiefly by the action of the breathing
muscles about the waist and the lower part of the chest. The voice
may be said to have its foundation in this part of the physical man.
This foundation, or center of control, will be rightly established,
not by any very positive physical action; not by a decided raising of
the chest; not by any such marked expansion or contraction as to
bring physical discomfort or rigid muscular conditions. When the
breath is taken in, by an easy, natural expansion, much as air is
taken into a bellows, there is, to a certain degree, a firming of the
breathing muscles; but this muscular tension is felt by the speaker
or singer, if felt at all, simply as a comfortable fullness around,
and slightly above, the waistline, probably more in front than
elsewhere. An eminent teacher of singing tells his pupils to draw the
breath into the stomach. That probably suggests the sensation. When
the breath has been taken in, it is to be gently withheld,—not
given up too freely,—and the tone is formed on the top, so to
speak, of this body of breath, chiefly, of course, in the mouth and
head. For the stronger and larger voice the breath is not driven out
and dissipated, but the tone is intensified and given completer
resonance within—within the nasal or head cavities, somewhat within
the pharynx and chest. This body of breath, easily held in good
control, by the lower breathing muscles, forms what is called the
vocal "support." It is a fixed base of control. It is a
fundamental condition, and is to be steadily maintained in all the
varied operations of the voice.