47,11 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Bentham Science Publishers
- Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
- Sprache: Englisch
Religious Philosophies and Environmental Ethics addresses the critical environmental crisis caused by human activity and examines how religious philosophies can contribute to solutions. The book explores the intersection of environmental ethics and religious thought, offering a fresh perspective on how spiritual beliefs might help guide humanity toward sustainable living. It examines the causes of environmental degradation, and various religious perspectives on the issue, and proposes faith-based solutions for a more harmonious relationship with nature. Through a blend of philosophical inquiry and practical application, the book aims to inspire change in how we approach environmental conservation.
Key Features:
- Explores the role of religious philosophies in solving environmental problems.
- Discusses the ethical implications of environmental degradation.
- Offers faith-based solutions for future sustainability.
- Proposes a new framework for integrating religious thought into environmental policy.
Readership:
Undergraduate and graduate students, researchers, and scholars in environmental studies, philosophy, and theology.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Seitenzahl: 396
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2024
Ähnliche
BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS LTD.
End User License Agreement (for non-institutional, personal use)
This is an agreement between you and Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. Please read this License Agreement carefully before using the book/echapter/ejournal (“Work”). Your use of the Work constitutes your agreement to the terms and conditions set forth in this License Agreement. If you do not agree to these terms and conditions then you should not use the Work.
Bentham Science Publishers agrees to grant you a non-exclusive, non-transferable limited license to use the Work subject to and in accordance with the following terms and conditions. This License Agreement is for non-library, personal use only. For a library / institutional / multi user license in respect of the Work, please contact: [email protected].
Usage Rules:
All rights reserved: The Work is the subject of copyright and Bentham Science Publishers either owns the Work (and the copyright in it) or is licensed to distribute the Work. You shall not copy, reproduce, modify, remove, delete, augment, add to, publish, transmit, sell, resell, create derivative works from, or in any way exploit the Work or make the Work available for others to do any of the same, in any form or by any means, in whole or in part, in each case without the prior written permission of Bentham Science Publishers, unless stated otherwise in this License Agreement.You may download a copy of the Work on one occasion to one personal computer (including tablet, laptop, desktop, or other such devices). You may make one back-up copy of the Work to avoid losing it.The unauthorised use or distribution of copyrighted or other proprietary content is illegal and could subject you to liability for substantial money damages. You will be liable for any damage resulting from your misuse of the Work or any violation of this License Agreement, including any infringement by you of copyrights or proprietary rights.Disclaimer:
Bentham Science Publishers does not guarantee that the information in the Work is error-free, or warrant that it will meet your requirements or that access to the Work will be uninterrupted or error-free. The Work is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied or statutory, including, without limitation, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The entire risk as to the results and performance of the Work is assumed by you. No responsibility is assumed by Bentham Science Publishers, its staff, editors and/or authors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products instruction, advertisements or ideas contained in the Work.
Limitation of Liability:
In no event will Bentham Science Publishers, its staff, editors and/or authors, be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, special, incidental and/or consequential damages and/or damages for lost data and/or profits arising out of (whether directly or indirectly) the use or inability to use the Work. The entire liability of Bentham Science Publishers shall be limited to the amount actually paid by you for the Work.
General:
Any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with this License Agreement or the Work (including non-contractual disputes or claims) will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Singapore. Each party agrees that the courts of the state of Singapore shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with this License Agreement or the Work (including non-contractual disputes or claims).Your rights under this License Agreement will automatically terminate without notice and without the need for a court order if at any point you breach any terms of this License Agreement. In no event will any delay or failure by Bentham Science Publishers in enforcing your compliance with this License Agreement constitute a waiver of any of its rights.You acknowledge that you have read this License Agreement, and agree to be bound by its terms and conditions. To the extent that any other terms and conditions presented on any website of Bentham Science Publishers conflict with, or are inconsistent with, the terms and conditions set out in this License Agreement, you acknowledge that the terms and conditions set out in this License Agreement shall prevail.Bentham Science Publishers Pte. Ltd. 80 Robinson Road #02-00 Singapore 068898 Singapore Email: [email protected]
PREFACE
The environment in which we reside faces numerous challenges, including pollution, overpopulation, and various other forms of degradation. The existing philosophies within environmental ethics have proven insufficient in addressing the current state of our environment. This book will explore various aspects of environmental degradation and evaluate environmental philosophies to determine their adequacy in addressing this degradation and fostering attitudinal and behavioral change concerning the environment. Recent times have witnessed a growing call for a new ethical framework that can alter human attitudes towards the environment, to reduce the adverse impacts of these attitudes. One potential avenue for transforming this status quo is religion. All the world's religions have historically expressed ethical concerns for the environment and its inhabitants. They have attributed moral significance to non-human creatures and proposed ethical responsibilities for humans, even though these ethical dimensions are often considered secondary or subordinate to responsibilities towards other humans. Throughout history, religions worldwide have recognized the earth's religious significance and humanity's religious obligations to care for its inhabitants. These shared ethical concerns are evident in historical teachings rather than actual religious practices. This book contends that religious philosophies and principles can complement existing environmental philosophies, thereby strengthening environmental protection. Specifically, it delves into the religious principles of Daoism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam, comparing them to existing environmental philosophies such as deep ecology, to construct a new environmental ethical framework. Through a nuanced examination of religious teachings and environmental philosophies, this book aspires to contribute to the ongoing discourse on environmental ethics, inviting readers to contemplate the potential of an integrated approach that transcends disciplinary boundaries and embraces the wisdom of both secular and spiritual traditions.
Introduction to Religious Philosophies and Environmental Ethics
Muzzamel Hussain ImranAbstract
This chapter provides a general overview of the intricate relationship between religious philosophies, environmental ethics, and the ongoing global environmental crisis. The chapter begins by tracing the historical background of the environmental movement, highlighting the unprecedented challenges humanity faces, including climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss. It emphasizes the role of technological advancements and human activities in significantly impacting the natural environment. The environmental crisis is portrayed as a multifaceted challenge necessitating a shift in societal values, attitudes, and behaviors. This chapter further delves into the intersection of religion and environmental issues, acknowledging the influential role of religious beliefs in shaping individual attitudes and behaviors. It underscores the need for a collaborative effort between environmentalists and religious organizations to address environmental degradation effectively.
The chapter explores the historical development of environmental philosophies, emphasizing the anthropocentric perspective that has contributed to the current environmental crisis. It suggests a reevaluation of existing ethical frameworks and proposes a novel approach rooted in religious principles. The chapter discusses how to bridge the gap between religion and sustainability, offering insights for policymakers to make informed decisions for environmental planning and management. The chapter argues that, given the prevalence of diverse religious beliefs globally, understanding and incorporating religious perspectives is crucial for tackling contemporary environmental challenges. Ultimately, the chapter advocates for a transformative vision that integrates the wisdom of faith to foster a harmonious coexistence between humanity and the environment, addressing the urgent environmental concerns facing the planet.
INTRODUCTION
For many individuals, an environmental crisis is not solely a consequence of specific economic, political, and social factors. It also constitutes a moral and
spiritual crisis, necessitating a broader philosophical and religious comprehension of ourselves as natural beings integrated into life cycles and reliant on ecosystems. This is because religion plays a role in shaping our perceptions of nature, both consciously and unconsciously. Religion furnishes fundamental interpretative narratives about our identity, the essence of nature, our origins, and our destination (Shehu, 2015). Moreover, it offers guidance on how we should interact with fellow humans and our relationship with the natural world (Hessel & Ruether, 2000). Religion fosters worldviews and ethical systems that underpin the core attitudes and values of diverse cultures and societies. Undeniably, religions play a pivotal role in shaping our perspectives on nature, as well as offering guidance on how we should treat our fellow humans and relate to the natural world. Consequently, religions are instrumental in molding worldviews and ethics that form the foundational attitudes and values of various cultures and societies. These religious values and ethical convictions influence our interactions with others, including our relationship with all forms of life, such as plants and animals (Tucker & Grim, 2001). Some argue that the environmental crisis is, in fact, a religious or moral crisis and that returning to religious traditions represents a key solution. Current evidence suggests that people are now more receptive to religious teachings than in the past. Therefore, the timing is opportune for an exploration of the potential contributions of specific religions in addressing the environmental crisis, particularly by cultivating more comprehensive environmental ethics for the global community (Tucker & Grim, 2001).
Hence, it is essential to delve into the environmental ethics within religions. These religious philosophies may, in turn, provide potential solutions to mitigate the harmful patterns and behaviors of humans (Sewpershad, 2018). With this viewpoint, it becomes evident that religious philosophies have the capacity to reshape or enhance environmental ethical philosophies and improve environmental stewardship. This was the driving force behind my exploration of this research topic—to examine whether a connection exists between religious philosophies and environmental ethical philosophies and how they might mutually influence one another.
A BRIEF HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT
We are currently confronted with an array of unprecedented crises, including climate change, pollution, biodiversity loss, zoonotic diseases, and more. The natural environment, which humanity has historically struggled against in the pursuit of economic development, is now being significantly impacted by our technological advancements. Technology has granted humans the status of a major geological force capable of influencing continental or even planetary scales (Bourdeau, 2004). The immense progress in science and technology poses a substantial threat to environmental stability, a threat best comprehended when we consider that humans have often perceived themselves as deities. Furthermore, in the modern age, humans lack sufficient restraints on their interactions with the natural environment (Abedi-Sarv & Shahvali, 2008). Tucker (2003) characterized it as biocide and genocide, and Gottlieb (1996) described it as a crisis encompassing our entire civilization—a slow, collective suicide. Gardner (2002) framed it as the defining challenge of our age (Tucker, 2003; Gottlieb, 1996; Gardner, 2002). The patterns of human production and consumption, industrialization, urbanization, dependence on fossil fuels and nuclear power, industrialized agriculture, and fishing practices have led to climate change, deforestation, desertification, habitat destruction, species decline, hazardous waste, and toxic chemical pollution. These factors collectively threaten the composition of life on Earth as we currently understand it (Jones, 1995). Since the onset of the Industrial Revolution in 17th century England, coal, and later petroleum, have served as fuels driving scientific and technological progress. This, in turn, led to industrial factories emitting ever-increasing quantities of carbon dioxide. Furthermore, advancements in automotive technology related to transportation and logistics also result in substantial carbon dioxide emissions. Human activities have triggered a rapid upsurge in greenhouse gas emissions, thereby affecting temperature changes over the past three decades. These changes are largely attributed to human attitudes and behaviors that exhibit a lack of awareness and ethical responsibility toward the environment, potentially exacerbating the issue further if a solution remains elusive (Wuebbles, 2012).
The environmental crisis, characterized by its multifaceted dimensions, severity, and far-reaching impacts, has been labeled as one of the most pressing challenges confronting humanity today (Gerten & Bergmann, 2012). The suffering inflicted on millions of people worldwide and the existential threats posed to the Earth's future and human society due to anthropogenic environmental impacts have underscored the imperative need for concerted efforts to align human affairs with the natural world's dynamics. Research reports published by prominent international organizations in recent decades have consistently sounded the alarm about a bleak future if humanity fails to reverse the trend of environmental degradation (Gottlieb, 2006). For example, as outlined by the IPCC (2014), climate change resulting from human activities is the primary driver behind the swift alterations in precipitation and the rising sea levels. These changes are, in turn, reshaping global hydrological systems and affecting both the quality and quantity of water resources worldwide. Climate change's adverse effects are also evident in the form of declining agricultural yields in various regions, raising significant concerns about food security for the expanding human population. The IPCC (2014) further identifies species extinction and ecosystem shifts as additional detrimental consequences of anthropogenic climate change on the natural environment. Anthropogenic climate change has various potential and realized impacts on human systems, including heightened occurrences of temperature-related illnesses and diseases resulting from shifts in the quality and availability of water resources, among other factors. Climate-induced ecosystem disruptions contribute to societal, economic, and institutional pressures, particularly in regions considered “vulnerable” (UNFCCC, 2007). The repercussions of environmental deterioration, especially on the world's impoverished populations, whose livelihoods are intricately linked to the physical environment and who often lack the resources required for adaptation, are profound.
While climate change is widely recognized as the most pressing environmental challenge of our contemporary world, there is a growing focus on environmental degradation stemming from human activities. As noted by the United Nations (UNEP, 2012), the accelerated consumption of resources driven by a burgeoning global population and technology-driven production is surpassing the Earth's capacity to renew depleted resources and mitigate the adverse effects of waste. Consequently, similar to climate change, direct environmental degradation resulting from human actions, such as excessive deforestation, land clearance for agriculture, and urbanization, as well as pollution from domestic and industrial waste, stands among the primary causes of environmental decline. The destruction of natural habitats due to these activities is already disrupting the delicate balance within ecosystems and leading to species extinction. Extensive deforestation serves as a major catalyst for desertification and soil degradation, while land, air, and water pollution are significant contributors to a multitude of health problems faced by human societies (UNEP, 2012). In recent years, experts, policymakers, and the general public have exhibited a mounting concern regarding the search for solutions to the escalating challenges presented by modern environmental issues. Tackling these environmental problems necessitates a transformation in our social values, attitudes, and behaviors. Moreover, formulating and executing an efficient strategy for mitigating these environmental issues demands a comprehension of how communities perceive environmental change and how they react to its consequences (Leiserowitz, 2008). Social theory and research concerning the interaction between society and the environment are, to a significant extent, motivated by the “aspiration to develop the necessary insights for effectively altering human behaviors that contribute to environmental issues” (Stern, 2000). Beyond acquiring the knowledge required to ameliorate society's adverse impact on the environment, social theory and research are profoundly shaped by the imperative to comprehend public perceptions of and responses to environmental risks. This stems from the shared understanding that, in order to adapt to and mitigate environmental crises, human society must foster positive changes in both public attitudes toward environmental conditions and the actions of the billions of individuals believed to contribute to environmental problems.
A key question is to what extent religion plays a role in the various categories of human resources mentioned above. To address this matter, we must examine the social impacts of religion. Religion is recognized for its role in influencing attitudes, behaviors, perceptions, coping mechanisms, and responses to environmental issues. Consequently, it is regarded as a crucial domain for research and policy related to contemporary environmental changes (Gerten & Bergmann, 2012). Empirical research provides evidence that religious beliefs and experiences significantly influence individual environmental attitudes and behaviors, as well as the perceptions and responses of communities to environmental change in numerous societies worldwide (Guth et al., 1995). Durkheim positions religion as a vital component of society when he states, “If religion has given birth to all that is essential in society, it is because the idea of society is the soul of religion” (Bellah, 1973). Religion imparts meaning to life, offers authoritative figures, and, most significantly for Durkheim, reinforces the morals and collective social norms within a society. Rather than dismissing religion as a mere fantasy, despite its natural origins, Durkheim regards it as an integral part of the social system. Religion provides cohesion, social control, and purpose for individuals, serving as a means of communication and gathering to facilitate interactions and the reaffirmation of social norms. According to him, religion works to unite people, thereby reiterating collective beliefs and morals in the minds of all society members (Bellah, 1973). While Max Weber (1992) drew his conclusions from a limited set of samples, he embarked on an extensive investigation of religions worldwide. His primary focus was on major, global religions boasting millions of followers. Weber conducted thorough examinations of Ancient Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Taoism. In “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism,” Weber probed the influence of Christianity on Western thought and culture. The central aim of Weber's research was to discern the impact of religion on social change. For instance, he identified the roots of capitalism, especially the “Protestant Work Ethic,” within Protestantism, while in Eastern religions, he perceived obstacles to capitalism (Weber, 1992; Haferkamp & Smelser, 1992). Additionally, Weber employs the concept of prophetic charisma to elucidate social change. According to his perspective, prophetic charisma emerges in more intricate societies and is vested in a prophet who heralds a divine mission or espouses a radical political doctrine. This manifestation of charisma often precipitates revolutions and fosters social change (Weber, 1992; Len, 2015). Considering these social impacts of religion, whether they obstruct or incite social change, it becomes evident that environmental issues, which necessitate global collaborative efforts for resolution, cannot be fully understood without addressing this significant aspect. Contemporary development experts concur that the active involvement of local communities is indispensable for resolving the majority of environmental problems (Kula, 2001). When we take into account that 84 percent of the global population holds diverse religious beliefs, it becomes evident that religion is a critical factor in addressing these worldwide challenges (PMC, 2022).
The Relationship Between the Humanity and the Environment
According to scientific understanding, the Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old, roughly a quarter-and-a-half of the age of the universe. As far as current knowledge goes, ours is the only planet in the universe that supports life. In their article “Sustainability: A Systems Approach,” Clayton and Radcliffe assert that biological life began on Earth nearly four billion years ago, which is only slightly less than the age of the planet itself. However, humans are of significantly more recent origin; our presence represents only about 0.005% of the existence of biological life on this planet, equivalent to one day in a 55-year lifespan (Clayton & Radcliffe, 1996). If one accepts the Darwinian theory of evolution, the emergence of human beings or Homo sapiens can be traced back to hominids approximately seven million years ago, with Homo sapiens appearing about 200,000 years ago. According to Clayton and Radcliffe, the earliest well-documented evidence of cultural behavior can be dated back to a mere 40,000 years ago. Nevertheless, certain examples, such as the Blombos caves, extend even further into the past. The domestication of both plants and animals commenced a mere 12,000 years ago, the first form of farming began about 8,000 years ago, and the development of the first small city occurred 6,000 years ago (Clayton & Radcliffe, 1996). Nonetheless, humanity has faced challenges in its quest to comprehend and control the natural world. Our studies of the Earth have primarily been aimed at uncovering its fundamental building blocks for the purpose of manipulating them to satisfy our needs and desires. We often behave as though we are disconnected from nature, asserting our superiority and inherent superiority (Chu & Karr, 2017). As a consequence, within the remarkably brief period of humanity's coexistence with other living beings, humans have wrought significant destruction. This persistent discord between humanity and nature has given rise to environmental deterioration and decay, which are proliferating at a pace that demands solutions not solely from environmentalists. The inclination in human culture is to regard these issues as purely scientific, technological, or political challenges, when, in fact, they represent challenges for both the entirety of humanity and each individual (Chu & Karr, 2017).
To save this planet, every individual must engage in self-examination. As the Iranian-American philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr (2007) aptly put it, “The environmental crisis is fundamentally a crisis of values” (Nasr, 2007). The value we assign to the environment, including its inhabitants such as animals, is the root cause of the environmental challenges we confront today. Human activities pose a significant threat to the very existence of our planet. An illustrative example is the meat industry, which is experiencing exponential growth. “As environmental science has progressed, it has become evident that the human desire for animal meat is a leading factor contributing to nearly every major form of environmental harm currently jeopardizing the future of humanity. This includes deforestation, erosion, freshwater scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the disruption of communities, and the proliferation of diseases” (World Watch, 2003).
The notion of 'value' discussed earlier is primarily rooted in policies and philosophies that have been developed over centuries. Environmental philosophies, despite their evolution, remain significantly shaped by the initial idea that the environment exists for the benefit of humankind. The values that govern humanity's connection with the environment stem from fundamental philosophies, including environmental ethics and various religious beliefs (Biel & Nilsson, 2005), which will be the central focus of this book.
The Relationship Between Philosophy and the Environmental Ethics
The history of philosophy and environmental ethics is extensive. The earliest recorded Western philosophy revealed a concern for the accurate comprehension of the non-human world. The ancient Greek Socratic philosophers extensively examined humanity's role in relation to the natural world and the universe's order (Katz, 1991). This demonstrates a significant connection between Western philosophy and environmental philosophy. In more recent times, the focus has shifted toward direct ethical principles governing human actions concerning the environment and the natural world. This 'new' perspective emerged in response to the growing awareness of the environmental crisis and can be traced back to the 1960s, with philosophers like Leopold, White, and Muir (Katz, 1991). These environmental discussions raise essential questions about our individual values, the nature of our existence, and the lives we lead. As succinctly put, “In short, environmental questions pose fundamental ethical and philosophical inquiries” (Des Jardins, 2001:24).
Contemporary environmental policies frequently derive from outdated philosophies, influencing our current practices significantly. The crisis we confront today, to a great extent, stems from decisions made in the past. It is crucial to acknowledge that these decisions were not made with malicious intent or the aim of harming the environment. Rather, they were made for reasons that were perceived as beneficial at the time and aligned with the prevailing 'philosophy' of that era (Des Jardins, 2001). Therefore, the examination of this decision-making process is a necessary step before we can embark on a different course of action. Various factors, such as the needs and requirements of the time, the availability of environmental resources, population size, and prevalent philosophies, played a pivotal role in shaping the decision-making process. As Weston (1999:6) points out, philosophy serves as a means by which humanity can give a voice to those who cannot speak or who are often not heard. Philosophy and ethics, in turn, offer an opportunity to contemplate decision-making and the kind of life we desire and should lead. They prompt us to question not only what we currently do but also what we ought to do (Weston, 1999). Remarkably, it was only in 1971 that the first conference dedicated to environmental philosophy was convened. In 1973, Richard Sylvan (2003) delivered a paper titled “Is there a need for a new environmental ethic?”. Following this, there was an increased emphasis on environmental philosophy and how we perceive the natural world (Sylvan, 2003). Nonetheless, the question persisted: What was the origin of the arguments that had emerged? On what grounds was it determined that something possesses intrinsic value, and by whom?
So, the question remains: What shapes philosophy? The values stemming from environmental philosophies have been embraced throughout history. However, it is essential to inquire about the origins of these philosophies and values. One of the wellsprings of human values is religion. Religious principles often guide human behavior and define what is deemed acceptable or unacceptable. Thus, it would be beneficial to investigate the connection between environmental philosophy and religion.
The Relationship Between Religion and the Environment
Religions have incorporated the environment into their philosophies for many centuries. The idea that environmental concerns and religion are intertwined has been explored by numerous writers. Unfortunately, many of the contemporary ecological issues are attributed to Christianity, especially the Judeo-Christian doctrine of creation (Attfield, 1994). Lynn White's controversial statement illustrates this point: “Since the roots of our troubles are so largely religious, the remedy must also be essentially religious” (White, 1967). Religion is perceived as the overarching framework upon which all things are built and from which they originate. One's value system is profoundly influenced by and fundamentally rooted in religion, to the extent that this framework molds our cultural systems, laws, ethics, and common sense (Greeley, 1993).
Debates have revolved around whether the relationship between religion and the environment leans more positively or negatively. These discussions encompass a spectrum, with White contending that anthropocentric Western Christianity has exerted a negative impact on the environment, while Buddhist teachings assert that everything on Earth is sacred and should not be harmed, potentially fostering a more positive perspective on the connection between religion and the environment. If it is through anthropocentric views of nature that Western religion has contributed to environmental degradation, then a pertinent question arises: Can Eastern religions serve as a constructive resource to help us address this pressing dilemma (Gill, 1999)? John Passmore's perspective on Western religions and their traditional ethical approach to nature has been widely embraced by many of his contemporaries as authoritative. A prevailing consensus has maintained that the core stance of Christianity is autocratic and anthropocentric. This stance asserts that everything in the natural world exists for the benefit and use of humanity, and thus, no moral constraints are deemed applicable in our interactions with non-human entities. Passmore contended that Christianity reinforced the notion that we are the ultimate masters of nature. While there have been dissenting voices against this perspective, a conclusive consensus has remained elusive (Attfield, 1994).
Various religions have held differing viewpoints. Ultimately, the environmental crisis boils down to a crisis of the mind, and the only means of altering the mindset is to instill apprehension about the inevitable consequences if change does not occur. Our thoughts define us, and our thoughts are shaped by our beliefs, faith, and culture. There is now a renewed call for humanity to transform its treatment of the environment. However, to ensure this transformation takes place, it must address people's values and beliefs, which often have their roots in religion. In the present day, environmentalists and philosophers are increasingly reaching out to religious organizations to collaborate in the battle against environmental degradation. Many philosophers recognize that the moral consensus necessary in the face of this global environmental crisis will not be solely the product of reason. This moral consensus may also need to incorporate religious narratives (Attfield, 1994).
This book will present how history has molded the widely accepted anthropocentric environmental ethic and how it has played a part in the environmental crisis confronting us today. Following a discussion of the philosophies and principles of four religions, this study will put forth a solution. This solution will elucidate how religious philosophies from the following two religions, namely Daoism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam, can be employed to enrich and enhance the prevailing anthropocentric philosophy. This, in turn, will establish a framework capable of reshaping our perspective on the environment.
CONTEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM
Environmental degradation, which is indicative of an environmental crisis, is intimately linked to the issues of development and modernity in our society and their impact on the physical and biological environment. Typically, development and modernity lead to a decline in environmental quality, and this predicament is primarily the result of human actions. Economic activities have been a significant contributor to pollution, deforestation, and environmental abuse. These economic activities are both environmentally polluting and detrimental to nature. Any environmental behavior that extracts from the natural environment without replenishing what has been taken in the name of progress, modernity, and development is bound to precipitate an environmental crisis. It is imperative that we do not sacrifice nature to merely fulfill human needs and insatiable desires (Young, 1994).
Over the past two decades, concerns regarding the ongoing environmental degradation have been mounting. Globally, we have witnessed challenges related to the scarcity of rainfall or excessive precipitation. Temperatures have been steadily increasing. Natural disasters have grown in both severity and frequency. Pollution of water bodies, extensive deforestation, poaching, and droughts have become recurring occurrences in our present times. Disasters now dominate the headlines on many international news channels. The environmental problems currently faced by the world are on the upswing, and humanity bears the blame for these mounting challenges. Even though the situation is already dire, as described above, the problems are far from abating; in fact, they are worsening. This is evident from the ongoing rise in sea levels and the increasing occurrence of droughts and heatwaves (Raygorodetsky, 2011).
It has become increasingly evident that the so-called ecological crisis stands as the foremost global concern. This is an issue that impacts all human beings, irrespective of nationality, race, or religion. Currently, humanity finds itself embroiled in a monumental battle to rectify the environmental wrongs committed. Unfortunately, there is a lack of coordinated efforts, which is a significant setback in the global mission to avert the irreversible consequences of global warming. Achieving success in this endeavor will necessitate the awakening of the majority, if not all, of the world's population, evoked by a collective sense of imminent peril faced by living species.
Recognizing this, the purpose of this book is to show how belief systems and practices rooted in religion can contribute to reducing environmental degradation. Consequently, the key question that this book aims to address is: What role can religious philosophies and their associated teachings play in assisting humanity in mitigating the ongoing environmental crisis?
The purpose of this book is nothing short of a profound reevaluation of our approach to environmental ethics and policy development. In an era marked by increasingly severe environmental crises and ethical dilemmas, this book undertakes the ambitious task of establishing a fresh framework for policymakers, one deeply rooted in the diverse tapestry of religious principles and philosophies. The ultimate objective is to examine, question, and ultimately enhance the existing environmental ethical philosophies, which have proven inadequate in addressing the ongoing issue of environmental degradation. By delving into the spiritual and moral underpinnings of various religious traditions, this research aims to determine whether these profound belief systems can indeed act as a corrective lens for the deficiencies in current environmental ethical frameworks. This book aims to present the possible harmonies that can be found between religious philosophies and modern environmental ethics, with a particular emphasis on alleviating the detrimental impacts of human interactions with the natural world. The ultimate goal is to create a new, more all-encompassing environmental ethical philosophy capable of guiding policymakers and society as a whole in establishing a sustainable and harmonious coexistence with the environment. This, in turn, ensures the well-being of both the present and future generations. This book, characterized by its innovative approach, endeavors to provide a pathway toward a more enlightened and responsible relationship with the planet, rooted in the enduring wisdom of religious thought.
WHY THIS BOOK IS IMPORTANT
The importance of this book is multifaceted and reverberates on several crucial fronts. Primarily, it tackles an existential issue of utmost significance. Environmental degradation presents an imminent peril to the survival of humanity and the varied ecosystems that inhabit this planet. The dire repercussions of such degradation, spanning reduced crop yields, depletion of vegetation cover, and heightened susceptibility to climate fluctuations, carry profound implications for all denizens of Earth. This research functions as an alert, casting a spotlight on the urgency of the environmental crisis and underlining the fact that the destiny of our species and the planet's biodiversity are intricately interconnected.
Secondly, the importance of this book extends to the domain of knowledge and decision-making. Through its exploration of the intricate interplay between religious philosophies and environmental ethics, it offers valuable insights that can guide decision-makers in the realms of environmental planning, management, and policy. This research equips policymakers and stakeholders with a more comprehensive comprehension of the ethical aspects related to environmental issues, thus enabling more informed and conscientious decision-making for the betterment of the environment.
Lastly, the significance of this book is rooted in its effort to bridge the gap between religion and sustainability. Through its engagement with religious philosophies, it aims to enhance the ethical and moral underpinnings of the environmental dialogue. In doing so, it establishes the foundation for a more inclusive and culturally aware approach to sustainable development, acknowledging that individuals from various religious backgrounds hold a significant role in influencing the future of our planet. In essence, this research embodies a transformative vision that harnesses the wisdom of faith to motivate ethical action, nurturing a harmonious coexistence between humanity and the environment for generations to come.
CONCLUSION
The challenges facing our environment today are undeniable. Pollution, overpopulation, and various forms of degradation are persistent and growing concerns. The existing environmental philosophies and ethics have proven insufficient in addressing the current state of our environment, leading us to explore new avenues for addressing these pressing issues. This book seeks to delve into the multifaceted dimensions of environmental degradation, evaluating the existing environmental philosophies and their adequacy in fostering attitudinal and behavioral changes towards the environment. Recent times have witnessed a growing call for a new ethical framework to transform human attitudes towards the environment, and one potential avenue for this transformation is religion. All major world religions have historically expressed ethical concerns for the environment and its inhabitants, attributing moral significance to non-human creatures and proposing ethical responsibilities for humans. This shared ethical concern is evident in the historical teachings of these religions, even though the practical application of these principles has often fallen short.
The book's objective is to demonstrate the potential harmonies between religious philosophies and modern environmental ethics, with a specific focus on mitigating the detrimental impacts of human interactions with the natural world. The ultimate goal is to create a new and comprehensive environmental ethical philosophy capable of guiding policymakers and society as a whole toward a sustainable and harmonious coexistence with the environment. In doing so, it ensures the well-being of both present and future generations.
As the subsequent chapters unfold, this book promises to be an enlightening journey that reevaluates our approach to environmental ethics and offers fresh insights into addressing the environmental challenges of our time. The profound connection between religion and environmental ethics will be explored, offering a transformative vision that harnesses the wisdom of faith to motivate ethical action and nurture a harmonious relationship between humanity and the environment for generations to come.
The next chapter will discuss the fundamental concepts of the environment and environmental degradation. It emphasizes the profound interconnection between the environment and humanity, rejecting the notion that they are separate. Growing human populations and resource-dependent economies have amplified this interdependence, with the environment bearing the brunt of our actions, evident in concerns like global warming and species extinctions. The exploitation of resources, once perceived as limitless, is at the core of environmental degradation, now recognized as a major global threat by the United Nations. Historical examples illustrate the decline in biodiversity and habitats. The chapter intends to delve further into diverse environmental conceptions and manifestations of degradation to foster a holistic understanding and seek sustainable solutions.
The Environmental Degradation
Muzzamel Hussain ImranAbstract
The concept of the environment is multifaceted and encompasses a complex interplay of physical, chemical, and biotic elements that sustain life. This chapter explores the diverse dimensions of the environment, encompassing the atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere. It emphasizes the interdependence between humans and the environment, highlighting the crucial role the environment plays in shaping various aspects of human life. The environment is not solely the natural world but also includes the built environment and cultural creations. The chapter delves into environmental degradation, emphasizing the threefold interaction humans have with the world—living off, in, and with the world. Human activities, such as resource extraction, habitat alteration, and waste generation, contribute to environmental degradation, disrupting ecosystems and posing threats to sustainable development. Unequal distribution of environmental consequences, often disproportionately affecting the impoverished, is also discussed.
Population growth, pollution, deforestation, desertification, and ozone depletion are identified as major contributors to environmental degradation. The chapter discusses the interconnected challenges posed by resource depletion, waste disposal, and urbanization. It calls for a conscious shift towards sustainable practices in science, technology, and population management to mitigate environmental degradation's far-reaching impacts on human health, quality of life, and overall well-being. Recognizing the environment's intrinsic value and fostering harmony with the natural world are emphasized as imperative steps in achieving global environmental sustainability. The chapter underscores the urgent need for responsible environmental stewardship, emphasizing that sustainable development hinges on safeguarding the environment.
INTRODUCTION
It is crucial to recognize that the natural environment not only predates but also surpasses human existence; humanity is an integral part of this all-encompassing system (Attfield, 1983). Consequently, the environment, which constitutes the shared natural habitat for humanity and all other living beings, holds a dual status: it is invaluable as the backdrop for sustaining life, yet also precarious due to its
susceptibility to maltreatment by its inhabitants. Throughout history, humanity has often viewed the environment as an infinite reservoir of invaluable resources and a boundless receptacle for all our waste and pollution (Attfield, 1983).
These repercussions of human behaviors and actions resonate on a global scale. The increasing pace of human population growth and economic expansion relies significantly on substantial amounts of natural resources. It is crucial to abandon the idea of perceiving the environment as distinct from the economy; in truth, they are interdependent, and any damage inflicted on the environment has serious consequences for all living beings. The repercussions of human presence in the environment are now resonating throughout nature (Taylor, 1986). In alignment with this perspective, Weston (1999) lends support to the idea, emphasizing that when humans perceive themselves as distinct or independent from nature, they open the door to the potential for exploitation and destruction. Humans, often irrationally, harbor the belief that the world's environment will perpetually provide for their needs and regenerate as required (Weston, 1999).
Humans are inherently predisposed or designed to utilize the natural world for their survival. Nevertheless, there exists a delicate balance between using it for survival and exploiting it for self-serving purposes. This mentality of exploitation, combined with the misguided notion that resources are boundless, along with humanity's unbridled actions, gives rise to grave issues such as global warming, the mass extinction of species, and various other significant consequences, culminating in environmental degradation (Attfield, 2003). Numerous organizations have meticulously documented various forms and the extent of environmental degradation. Environmental degradation is defined as any alteration or disruption to the environment that is regarded as objectionable or harmful. In essence, 'degradation' signifies a negative shift in both the quality and quantity of natural resources. In broader terms, it can be loosely understood as the deterioration of the environment resulting from the depletion of natural resources and the destruction of ecosystems. The scale of environmental degradation has surged to such an extent that it now stands as one of the ten threats officially recognized by the United Nations' High-Level Threat Panel (Tyagi et al., 2014). As previously mentioned, the principal cause of environmental degradation is widely attributed to human interference.
This is not a recent phenomenon, and if society believes that there's ample time to address it, that is a painful misconception. This degradation has been ongoing for centuries and has now reached critical levels. For instance, in 1594, Verrazano reported smelling cedar a hundred leagues away (one league is approximately 5,556 km) from land, and there were accounts of sailing through beds of floating flowers. Abundant poultry, deer, and lynx greeted people in unimaginable numbers. Whales congested the seas to the extent that they posed a navigational hazard. Cape Cod teemed with marine life, and salmon thrived in the Atlantic Ocean. Lobsters were so plentiful that they were used as pig food, fish bait, and even potato fertilizer. They served as the staple diet for the navy, consumed five times a week. Islands were densely populated with seals, walrus, and seabirds. However, a mere 45 years later, many of these species have been slaughtered, displaced, over-farmed, or over-fished to the point of extinction (Weston, 1999). Some subspecies of animals have vanished before we could even acknowledge their existence. Vast tracts of rainforests that housed countless and diverse species are now engulfed in flames. Species like the spotted owl, willow flycatcher, lynx, rhinoceros, elephant, bobcat, scarlet tanager, and many more find themselves on the endangered list, or perilously close to extinction. Blue whales, which are among the largest living creatures on Earth, have seen their numbers plummet from approximately half a million to around 3,000 worldwide in just 200 years. The destruction of habitats poses a severe threat to numerous species, placing them on the brink of extinction (Weston, 1999).
The disheartening outcomes persistently accumulate: various other types of environmental degradation persist, dwindling resources are being exploited, and humans are fundamentally jeopardizing the planet's life support system (Cyprian Obiora Alokwu, 2009). To gain insight into the extent of environmental degradation, it is imperative to have a comprehensive grasp of the term “environment.” This chapter will, therefore, commence by examining the diverse conceptions of the environment as presented by different authors and provide a clear definition of this concept. Subsequently, it will delve into a discussion of various manifestations of environmental degradation.
