18,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Fachliteratur
- Sprache: Englisch
Target high returns and greater consistency with this insightful guide from a leading investor The market volatility exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic has led many to question their exposure to risk in their own portfolios. But what should one do about it? In Risk Parity: How to Invest for All Market Environments, accomplished investment consultant Alex Shahidi delivers a powerful approach to portfolio management that reduces the potential for significant capital loss while maintaining an attractive expected return. The book focuses on allocating capital amongst four diverse asset classes: equities, commodities, Treasury bonds, and Treasury Inflation Protected Securities. You'll learn about: * The nature of risk and why traditional approaches to risk management unnecessarily give up potential returns or inadequately protect against catastrophic market events * Why proper risk management is more important now than ever * How to efficiently implement a risk parity approach Perfect for both individual and professional investors, Risk Parity is a must-have resource for anyone seeking to increase consistency in their portfolio by building a truly balanced asset allocation.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 372
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Ähnliche
Table of Contents
Cover
Praise for
Risk Parity
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Foreword
Preface
Acknowledgments
About the Author
Introduction
NOTE
CHAPTER ONE: What Is Risk Parity?
RISK PARITY IS ALL ABOUT BALANCE
THE SOURCE OF RETURNS
WHAT IS RISK?
THE 60/40 PORTFOLIO IS NOT WELL‐BALANCED
RISK PARITY FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
PEER GROUP RISK
CHAPTER TWO: Two Steps to Build a Well‐Balanced Portfolio
STEP 1: WHICH ASSET CLASSES TO REDUCE RISK?
STEP 2: HOW TO STRUCTURE EACH ASSET CLASS TO HAVE EQUITY‐LIKE RETURNS
CHAPTER THREE: Equities
WHAT ARE STOCKS?
HOW DO STOCKS PERFORM ACROSS DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS?
WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO INVEST IN EQUITIES?
STOCK MARKET CYCLES
ARE THERE EXTRAORDINARY ENVIRONMENTS TO CONSIDER?
SUMMARY
NOTE
CHAPTER FOUR: Treasuries
WHAT ARE TREASURIES?
HOW DO TREASURIES PERFORM ACROSS DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS?
WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO INVEST IN TREASURIES?
ARE THERE EXTRAORDINARY ENVIRONMENTS TO CONSIDER?
SUMMARY
CHAPTER FIVE: TIPS
WHAT ARE TIPS?
HOW DO TIPS PERFORM ACROSS DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS?
WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO INVEST IN TIPS?
ARE THERE EXTRAORDINARY ENVIRONMENTS TO CONSIDER?
SUMMARY
NOTES
CHAPTER SIX: Commodities
WHAT ARE COMMODITIES?
HOW DO COMMODITIES PERFORM ACROSS DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS?
WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO INVEST IN COMMODITIES?
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
SUMMARY
CHAPTER SEVEN: Other Asset Classes
EQUITY SUBGROUPS
NON‐US BONDS
CORPORATE BONDS
MUNICIPAL BONDS
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
PRIVATE EQUITY
HEDGE FUNDS
CRYPTOCURRENCIES
CASH
SUMMARY
CHAPTER EIGHT: Risk Parity Portfolio Summary
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
TARGET ALLOCATION
RISK PARITY WITHOUT LEVERAGE OR WITH MORE LEVERAGE
SUMMARY
NOTE
CHAPTER NINE: Risk Parity Portfolio Historical Returns
RETURNS SINCE 1998 (TIPS INCEPTION)
RETURNS SINCE 1970
RETURNS SINCE 1926
SUMMARY
NOTES
CHAPTER TEN: The Timeliness of Risk Parity
THE CENTRAL BANK
THE DELEVERAGING HEADWIND
RISE OF POPULISM
THE NET OUTCOME OF MAJOR HEADWINDS AND TAILWINDS IS HIGHLY UNCERTAIN
THE NEED FOR LIQUIDITY, LOW FEES, AND TAX EFFICIENCY
CHAPTER ELEVEN: The Rebalancing Boost
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: BUY LOW, SELL HIGH
LOW CORRELATION AND HIGH VOLATILITY
THE REBALANCING BOOST APPLIED TO THE RISK PARITY PORTFOLIO
SUMMARY
CHAPTER TWELVE: Efficient Implementation
SIMPLICITY
HIDDEN LINE ITEMS
LOW COST
HIGH LIQUIDITY
LOW TAXES
TRANSPARENCY
LEVERAGE
SUMMARY
NOTES
CHAPTER THIRTEEN: When Does Risk Parity Underperform?
BREAK GLASS IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
RISKY ASSETS VERSUS CASH
CASH IS KING DURING TWO ENVIRONMENTS
RARE AND SHORT‐LIVED PERIODS
CONCEPTUALLY NETTING THE IMPACT TO ASSET‐CLASS PRICES
ABSOLUTE VERSUS RELATIVE UNDERPERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
CHAPTER FOURTEEN: FAQs
DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO OWN LONG DURATION BONDS WITH LOW INTEREST RATES?
HOW DOES RISK PARITY FIT WITHIN THE TOTAL PORTFOLIO?
DOES DIVERSIFICATION WORK DURING A CRISIS?
IF RISK PARITY IS SO OBVIOUS, WHY ISN'T EVERYONE INVESTING THIS WAY?
DOES REBALANCING MORE OR LESS FREQUENTLY MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE?
CHAPTER FIFTEEN: Conclusion
Index
End User License Agreement
List of Tables
Chapter 1
Table 1.1 Portfolios of High Returning, Uncorrelated Investments
Chapter 3
Table 3.1 Asset‐Class Economic Biases
Table 3.2 Equity Excess Returns by Decade
Table 3.3 Long‐Term Equity Cycles (1926–2021)
Table 3.4 10‐Year Rolling Equity Excess Returns (1926–2021)
Chapter 4
Table 4.1 Asset‐Class Economic Biases
Table 4.2 Equities and Treasuries During Recent Bear Markets
Table 4.3 Starting and Ending 10‐Year Treasury Yield During Recent Bear Markets...
Table 4.4 Equities and Treasuries During Recent Bull Markets
Chapter 5
Table 5.1 Asset‐Class Economic Biases
Chapter 6
Table 6.1 Asset‐Class Economic Biases
Table 6.2 Asset‐Class Economic Biases
Chapter 7
Table 7.1 The Economic Bias of Four Major Asset Classes
Table 7.2 The Economic Bias of Major Asset Classes (Expanded List)
Chapter 8
Table 8.1 Average Standard Deviation of Equities, Treasuries, TIPS, and Commodit...
Table 8.2 Equal
Capital
Allocation to Each Asset Class
Table 8.3 Equal
Risk
Allocation to Each Asset Class
Table 8.4 The Risk Parity Portfolio
Table 8.5 An Unlevered Risk Parity Portfolio
Table 8.6 More Levered Risk Parity Portfolio
Table 8.7 Summary of Three Risk Parity Portfolios with Different Leverage Amount...
Chapter 9
Table 9.1 Risk Parity Portfolio versus Global Equities and 60/40 – April 1998 to...
Table 9.2 Risk Parity Portfolio versus Global Equities and 60/40 – by Decade*...
Table 9.3 Risk Parity Portfolio versus Global Equities and 60/40 – by Calendar Y...
Table 9.4 Asset‐Class Returns During Major Equity Down Years
Table 9.5 Asset‐Class Returns – April 1998 to March 2021
Table 9.6 Risk Parity Portfolio versus Global Equities and 60/40 – January 1970 ...
Table 9.7 Risk Parity Portfolio versus Global Equities and 60/40 – by Decade*...
Table 9.8 Asset‐Class Returns by Decade*
Table 9.9 Risk Parity During Historical Bear Markets
Table 9.10 Risk Parity Bear Markets
Table 9.11 Risk Parity Portfolio versus Global Equities and 60/40 – by Calendar ...
Table 9.12 Equities and Unlevered Treasuries – January 1926 to March 2021*...
Table 9.13 Equities, Treasuries, and 50/50 Mix – January 1926 to March 2021*...
Table 9.14 Equities, Treasuries, and 50/50 Risk Balanced Mix – by Decade*...
Table 9.15 Risk Balanced Mix during Equity Bear Markets pre‐1970
Chapter 11
Table 11.1 Rebalancing After Year 1
Table 11.2 Ending Value After Year 2
Table 11.3 Rebalancing After Year 1 – More Volatile Assets
Table 11.4 Ending Value After Year 2 – More Volatile Assets
Table 11.5 Risk Parity Portfolio Asset‐Class Returns – April 1998 to March 2021...
Chapter 13
Table 13.1 Negative Calendar‐Year Excess Returns for Risk Parity – Since January...
Table 13.2 Factors That Impacted Asset‐Class Returns – First Quarter 2020...
Table 13.3 Percentage of Time Risk Parity Portfolio Beat Global Equities – Janua...
Table 13.4 Percentage of Time Risk Parity Portfolio Beat 60/40 – January 1970 to...
Table 13.5 Percentage of Time Risk Parity Portfolio Beat Cash – January 1970 to ...
Chapter 14
Table 14.1 Asset‐Class Returns During Rising Interest Rates – March 1971 to Sept...
Table 14.2 Various Asset‐Class Cumulative Returns During Last Four Bear Markets...
Table 14.3 Risk Parity Portfolio Results with Various Rebalancing Frequencies
List of Illustrations
Chapter 1
Figure 1.1 Building a Smoother Path
Chapter 3
Figure 3.1 Annualized Global Equity Excess Returns by Economic Environment –...
Chapter 4
Figure 4.1 Annualized Long‐Term Treasury Excess Returns by Economic Environm...
Chapter 5
Figure 5.1 Annualized Long‐Term TIPS Excess Returns by Economic Environment ...
Chapter 6
Figure 6.1 Annualized Long‐Term Commodity Futures and Commodity Producer Equ...
Figure 6.2 Annualized Long‐Term Commodity Futures versus 60/40 Commodity Pro...
Chapter 9
Figure 9.1 $1 Invested in Risk Parity, Equities, and 60/40 – January 1970 to...
Chapter 10
Figure 10.1 US Total Debt as a Percentage of Potential Nominal GDP (1915–202...
Guide
Cover Page
Table of Contents
Praise for Risk Parity
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Foreword
Preface
Acknowledgments
About the Author
Introduction
Begin Reading
Index
End User License Agreement
Pages
i
ii
iii
iv
v
ix
x
xi
xii
xiii
xiv
xv
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
xxi
xxii
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
173
174
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
185
186
187
Praise for Risk Parity
“A must‐read for anyone investing in the market who wants to maximize upside return while minimizing downside risk. Alex has skillfully crafted a ‘how to’ book that spells out, step‐by‐step, building a balanced portfolio that can generate equity‐like returns across a diverse spectrum of asset classes without the concomitant risk of equity securities, a strategy that will deliver in the long run no matter the market or economic environment. His proven, no‐nonsense approach is communicated in such a refreshingly straightforward manner that it can be easily understood and applied in practice by novice investors while simultaneously educating and informing the savviest wealth manager. If you're laboring under the belief that a balanced portfolio is 60% stocks and 40% bonds, then this book is for you. Risk Parity will change your life—and your wallet!”
—Lloyd Greif, President and CEO, Greif & Co.; Founder, Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies at the University of Southern California's Marshall School of Business
“Alex has written a book that perfectly encapsulates why his vision and perspective on finances is so deeply respected. I've been lucky enough to have his wisdom and guidance around risk parity investing and now you can, too.”
—Greg Berlanti, writer, producer, and director
“This book is an excellent roadmap for understanding both how, and more importantly why, risk parity strategies work. Alex deftly explains the differences between a 60/40 portfolio and a more balanced strategy.”
—Bill Lee, former CIO, Kaiser Permanente
“When done right, diversification can be the key to producing better investment returns over the long haul—yet not enough investors have been paying enough attention. For this reason, I consider Risk Parity one of the best portfolio strategy books for growth investors and money managers.”
—Daniel Martins, Founder, DM Martins Capital Management; regular contributor to Seeking Alpha
“Alex shows that the standard portfolio of stocks and bonds may be a lot riskier than most people realize. This is a terrific critique of conventional thinking on asset allocation.”
—Brett Arends, MarketWatch columnist
Risk Parity
How to Invest for All Market Environments
Alex Shahidi
Copyright © 2022 by Alex Shahidi. All rights reserved.
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.Published simultaneously in Canada.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per‐copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750‐8400, fax (978) 646‐8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748‐6011, fax (201) 748‐6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at (800) 762‐2974, outside the United States at (317) 572‐3993, or fax (317) 572‐4002.
Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e‐books or in print‐on‐demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.
Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data
Names: Shahidi, Alex, author.
Title: Risk parity : how to invest for all market environments / AlexShahidi.
Description: Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., [2022] |Includes index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2021031557 (print) | LCCN 2021031558 (ebook) | ISBN 9781119812562 (hardback) | ISBN 9781119812432 (adobe pdf) | ISBN 9781119812425 (epub)
Subjects: LCSH: Risk management. | Portfolio management.
Classification: LCC HD61 .S389 2022 (print) | LCC HD61 (ebook) | DDC 658.15/5—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021031557LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021031558
Cover Design: WileyCover Image: © Dimitri Otis/Getty Images
I dedicate this book to the investors with curiosity to learn and open‐mindedness to overcome convention.
Foreword
Alex is doing a great service to the savers and investors of the world and, in particular, those who are responsible for their livelihood in retirement. Statistics show that the average individual investor has substantially underperformed most passively held asset mixes. And the history of markets shows that every asset class in every country over the past 200 years has suffered massive wealth destruction at one time or another, meaning a decline in real purchasing power of 50% to 80% within the course of a decade. Even cash is a very risky asset when you view it through the lens of inflation‐adjusted returns. Today, cash and bonds are particularly risky, because policy makers have pushed real interest rates into negative territory and are holding them there as a means of reducing the burdens on debtors, shifting that burden to the retirements of savers and asset holders.
In recognition of the risks, we at Bridgewater believe that the most reliable solution is a balanced portfolio. By balanced I mean a portfolio whose risk allocation is distributed across a set of asset classes which have offsetting exposures to shifts in the economic environment. Shifts in economic growth and inflation exert a dominant influence on asset returns. Therefore, you want a mix of assets that neutralizes these influences on returns.
At Bridgewater we refer to this as the All Weather approach: a portfolio that is balanced to the influences of economic growth and inflation, enabling performance across all environments. Many of us have applied this All Weather approach for decades to our own personal portfolios and for the largest and most sophisticated institutional investors in the world. In time, the approach has become known as Risk Parity, and a number of professional asset managers developed their own way of doing it. There are significant differences, but what they all have in common is a balanced allocation of risk across complementary asset classes.
What Alex is doing in this book is making this balanced approach available to anyone who wants reliability of investment returns over time, regardless of how economic conditions transpire. There is no fluff or bluster in the book. Each chapter is a relevant building block toward a well‐balanced whole. This is not a book of empty assertions or unproven theories. It is backed up by research and logic, which he presents in each chapter. The research and logic have been borne out through time.
We at Bridgewater have known Alex for a very long time and can attest to the thoughtfulness and thoroughness of his approach. He describes his journey; we watched it unfold first‐hand. There is legitimacy and authenticity to what follows. I hope that you take it seriously and put it into action.
Bob Prince
Co‐CIO, Bridgewater Associates
Preface
A fundamental question all investors face is whether they want their portfolio to be balanced or imbalanced. Framing the decision in this simple way leads to an obvious answer. Why would anyone not desire good balance, particularly when a portfolio can be easily diversified without sacrificing long‐term returns?
Surprisingly, nearly every portfolio that I have observed over the past couple of decades has been poorly balanced. These portfolios are overly sensitive to shifting economic environments, performing brilliantly during good times and underperforming the rest of the time. In fact, it seems that investors have become accustomed to their portfolios rising and falling along with the stock market's wild swings. We cheer on bull markets and suffer through the inevitable downturns as we are all in the market together. Investors have been conditioned to believe that attractive long‐term returns can only be attained by allocating a large percentage of their portfolio to stocks, which can be highly volatile. Those who can't stomach the ride should not participate.
I wrote this book with the aim of debunking this widely held myth. I introduce an easy‐to‐follow conceptual framework that allows for strong balance while targeting long‐term returns competitive with equities. This is not an approach that involves market timing, a sophisticated trading strategy, or the use of esoteric investment vehicles. A simple, fixed allocation across a diversified mix of major asset classes is all that is needed to achieve the objective.
The investment strategy, commonly termed “Risk Parity,” is not something new and untested. Some of the world's most sophisticated institutions have adopted and successfully implemented this approach for several decades. Bridgewater Associates, the largest hedge fund in the world, developed the concepts presented in this book over 25 years ago and has been running a risk parity strategy for its giant institutional portfolios ever since.
It seems that investors' portfolios are not only imbalanced, but that investors don't have a full understanding of what it means to be balanced. I want to share these insights that I have gleaned from the smartest minds in the industry because every investor, large and small, deserves to know. In this book, I attempt to describe the framework in a language that anyone interested in investing will understand regardless of their investment acumen and experience. Over the years, I have had the opportunity to walk through the concepts with a wide variety of investors and investment professionals. With repetition comes an appreciation of the points that resonate and a refined narrative for more complex topics.
Moreover, I feel strongly that investors need more balance today than perhaps at any point in our lifetimes. The potential range of economic outcomes is exceedingly broad, and the odds of extreme results only seem to increase over time. My goal is to equip investors with the knowledge and tools they need to build smarter portfolios and avoid taking unnecessary risk.
Acknowledgments
The author is not the sole writer of a book. The ideas presented were likely sparked by someone else. The manner in which the concepts are described was probably polished from constructive feedback from the audience. One of the greatest challenges writers face is appropriately zooming out to ensure the overall message is clear when we are deeply immersed in the current paragraph that we strive to perfect. Thoughtful feedback from friends, family, and colleagues who offered a fresh perspective of the big picture enabled me to stay on course.
Damien Bisserier, my business partner since 2014 and close friend long before then, has not only taught me the intricate details of the risk parity approach but also how to tell the story. Damien worked at Bridgewater Associates for nearly a decade, so he was steeped in these concepts and was trained by the most sophisticated proponents of the strategy to effectively convey the concepts. I have immensely benefited from his hard work and brilliance for many years and would like to acknowledge his contribution.
Michael Marco, a valued colleague of mine at Evoke Advisors and former Investment Associate at Bridgewater, provided extremely insightful feedback throughout this process. His unique background and time commitment to carefully read the entire manuscript was an invaluable asset in this journey. Thank you Michael.
My deepest gratitude goes to the entire Bridgewater organization, particularly to Jim Haskel, Ray Dalio, Bob Prince, and Greg Jensen, all of whom were integral in familiarizing me with the concepts presented in this book many years ago. Without my connection to Bridgewater and their support to write this book (and my previous book), none of this would have made it to print.
Brendan Corcoran and Aman Ahluwalia, who work with me at Evoke, took the time to read every word and offer valuable comments. I recognize that they both had little time to spare, so I appreciate their commitment to help. I am also thankful for the contributions of the following partners at Evoke: David Hou, Mark Sear, Kim Ip, Darell Krasnoff, Andrew Palmer, and Eric Bright. I appreciate your interest on the subject and input into the process.
Eric Schwartz, Abigail Johnson, Mike Miller, Diane Mirowski, Corey Barash, Aaron Iba, and Andrew Gwozdz dove in and thoughtfully shared their views. Each comes from a very different background, which provides a unique perspective that helped shape how the book was written.
The team at Wiley deserves recognition for the countless hours spent on this project. It all started with Bill Falloon, who gave me an opportunity to publish my first book seven years ago. Thank you for taking a chance on an inexperienced author and for trusting me to write a second one. Purvi Patel and Samantha Enders, your professionalism and dedication to develop my manuscript into the final product is greatly appreciated. It has been an absolute joy working with all of you.
Finally, I am thankful for my soulmate of over 20 years, Danielle, and our precious children, Michael and Bella, for their continued support throughout. Their persistent encouragement fueled me through writing challenges I faced along the way and helped me stay focused on the finish line.
About the Author
Alex Shahidi is a Managing Partner and Co‐Chief Investment Officer at Evoke Advisors, a $21 billion registered investment advisor. Alex has more than 20 years of experience as an investment consultant managing billions of dollars for institutional and ultra‐high‐net‐worth clients. He began his career at Merrill Lynch, where he led one of the firm's largest institutional consulting groups, advising more than $10 billion in assets with an average client size of approximately $300 million. After Merrill, Alex co‐founded Advanced Research Investment Solutions (ARIS), where he, along with co‐founder Damien Bisserier, oversaw the firm's research and client service efforts.
Alex is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA®), a Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA®), a Certified Financial Planner (CFP®), and a Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC®). Barron's magazine has repeatedly ranked him as one of America's Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors, Top 1,200 Financial Advisors, and Top 1,000 Financial Advisors.
Alex graduated cum laude from the University of California, Santa Barbara, with degrees in business economics and law. He earned a JD from the University of California, Hastings Law School, and is a member of the bar in California.
Alex's first book, Balanced Asset Allocation: How to Profit in Any Economic Climate, was published by Wiley in 2014. The article introducing the premise of the book was recognized with the IMCA 2012 Stephen L. Kessler Writing Award as well as in the Wall Street Journal, Market Watch, Money News,Fidelity.com, and Wall Street Daily.
Alex has been interviewed on Bloomberg Television and Radio, BBC World News, and Yahoo Finance and for articles in the Wall Street Journal, Barron's, and other major publications. He has also been featured in numerous podcasts including Capital Allocators, The Investor's Podcast, and Seeking Alpha.
Introduction
My business partners and I have been on a multidecade journey to discover the optimal portfolio. We recognize that we will never reach the destination of this lifelong crusade – investing is like an impossible puzzle that has no perfect solution. But we have set out as our mission to endlessly progress toward the ultimate goal. Fortunately, we have the opportunity to explore potential answers with some of the most sophisticated investors in the world. As Co‐Chief Investment Officer of Evoke Advisors, a multibillion‐dollar SEC‐registered investment advisor in Los Angeles, I regularly engage with well‐respected investment managers and industry thought leaders. We at Evoke have also been blessed to build a network of some of the greatest investment minds of our time, including CIOs of leading institutional investors and founders of the world's largest and most successful money managers. As students of the market with an intense focus, we have gleaned insight over the years from repeated interactions with the smartest investors who are also searching for similar investment answers.
Investing can be incredibly humbling. Mistakes are inevitable and seem to conveniently transpire just when you think you've figured it all out. This is evidently one of those industries in which the more you learn the more you realize how little you know. It is interesting to take a step back and observe that we know so much more now than we did 20 years ago, but that only means that we will certainly be more knowledgeable 20 years from now. This simple recognition is imperative because it prevents complacency and forces us to march on and continue the search. The crystallization of the end goal also makes it easier to find other like‐minded individuals from whom we can expand our learning.
For me, a monumental step forward occurred in 2005 when I was first introduced to Bridgewater Associates. As an institutional investment consultant at Merrill Lynch, I was seeking insightful investment managers to allocate the billions of dollars that were entrusted to my team and me. Our group was founded and led by John Ebey, one of the brightest investment minds I have met to this day. John is also one of the most genuine, charming, and generous individuals I have ever known. However, his greatest talent may be his remarkable storytelling abilities. He's the one who originally discovered Bridgewater, which he eloquently conveys in a story that I repeat next.
Bridgewater is the largest hedge fund in the world and typically only works with major pools of capital such as sovereign wealth funds, enormous pension plans, and college endowments. Unlike most investment firms, they typically do not cater to high‐net‐worth individuals, evidenced by their current stated minimum client size of $5 billion! John had known of Bridgewater by reading about them and hearing good things from investors he highly respected. John is not bashful, particularly when it comes to pursuing solutions to investment problems for clients. He called Bridgewater's front desk and asked to speak with an investment professional who would answer his questions about their strategies. No one returned his call. He tried again and again without success. He concluded that the likely reason for the lack of response was that he worked at Merrill Lynch, which is better known for advising wealthy families (rather than institutions with over $5 billion in assets).
John's persistence eventually paid off and he was able to set up a time to meet with someone at the firm. He flew from Los Angeles to Bridgewater's campus in rural Westport, Connecticut. Thanks to his charming demeanor, the meeting swiftly transitioned from the normal discussion about investment philosophy to him instantly gaining favor. He was introduced to the top professionals in the firm shortly thereafter and eventually became one of Bridgewater's favorite clients. They even studied his presentation style and asked for tips to better inform how they interacted with clients.
The next time Bridgewater was in Los Angeles, John set up a time for me to meet them. I was captivated by their unique approach from that initial meeting, and I set out to learn as much as I could from this organization. John started to allocate our client capital to Bridgewater's strategies, officially launching my multidecade relationship with this firm.
Bridgewater is first and foremost a research organization. They have been publishing their “Daily Observations” every business day for over 30 years. These deliberately private pieces are reserved for their clients, and they are designed to provide an over‐the‐shoulder peak into the firm's latest thinking. The Daily Observations are widely considered so insightful that they have essentially become required reading for managers of the largest pools of capital across the globe and for leading central bankers and policymakers. My first task upon discovery of this gold mine was to download and print every Daily Observations in their client archive. My reading stack of past “wires,” as they are commonly termed, measured over six inches thick and continued to grow since new wires came out every day. I read every single one and attained more investment knowledge in three months than I had collected in my previous six years.
Ray Dalio founded Bridgewater in 1975. Ray is among the most successful and highly regarded investors of all time and one of the wealthiest individuals in the world. Ray hired my business partner, Damien Bisserier, at Bridgewater in 2004, when the firm had about 200 employees (today they have over 1,500). Damien started his Bridgewater career in the research department and worked his way to a client‐facing role because of his passion for helping sophisticated institutions solve complex investment problems. I was one of Damien's clients, which is how we originally connected.
The year 2007 was a major turning point. Damien set up a meeting with Ray and me, which was the first time that I had ever met him in person. He explained the origins of his investment philosophy and what led to his work that formed the foundation for his All Weather portfolio, which is commonly referred to as “risk parity” today. Ray had been searching for years for a simple portfolio that could be used to manage his family's assets for generations. As a professional investor he appreciated the difficulty of timing markets and generating “alpha,” so his goal was to identify an investment solution that was completely passive: a set‐it‐and‐forget‐it portfolio that is designed to deliver attractive returns while surviving all the bumps along the way. He walked me through the logical sequence for his pioneering work and creation of All Weather.
It was a memorable hour that culminated in my asking a simple question: If this is so obvious, then why is this approach so different from the conventional portfolio? Ray said that he had grappled with that very question for years and finally concluded that it was because of a lack of smart, independent thinkers. We are educated in school to read and regurgitate what we learned on exams and papers. Those who master this process tend to excel in school and earn highly coveted job offers. At work, they are generally trained to follow the lead of others before them, and the process repeats itself. Rarely are we encouraged to challenge convention and discern the truth by investigating the core issues ourselves. Inertia and peer risk can also play material roles in prolonging the status quo. Both can prevent adoption of new approaches even when there's agreement that it is better. The pull to follow others and the risk of being different and looking wrong can be powerful forces that require both independent thinking as well as high conviction to overcome.
To reach the All Weather framework he had to challenge the assumptions he had been taught at Harvard Business School and through broadly accepted investment tenets. He had to think independently to, in effect, reinvent the proverbial wheel. One of Ray's gifts is his intuitive drive to avoid blindly accepting traditional perspectives and to start from the most basic level to uncover his own conclusions. He described it as going from assumption A to assumption B and so on until you reach the conclusion. Most people don't go back to A, they start at E since it is widely viewed as the truth. If you start at E, then you end up in the same place as everyone else, but if you start at A you end up where he did.
I learned from Ray not to accept investment assumptions on their face without doing the independent work to determine if I arrive at the same point. Therefore, I took what he taught me and set out to figure it out on my own. This sparked a multiyear research project and development of a 10,000‐page Excel spreadsheet as I studied 100 years of financial market data. Of course, I ended up in the exact same place as Ray and eventually published my findings in my first book, Balanced Asset Allocation: How to Profit in Any Economic Climate, which was published by Wiley in 2014. Ray and Bridgewater were strongly supportive of the project and instrumental in providing me with the required data to back my findings.
Damien called me after my first meeting with Ray to let me know that Ray enjoyed our encounter and hoped that I would join Bridgewater. I managed to flip the discussion by explaining to Damien why I loved my career and my position of helping my clients, and I would never consider a change. That led to an ongoing dialogue about possibly working together at some point in the future. Over time, we realized that we were completely aligned in our mission to strive to continually improve client portfolios and our belief about how an ideal business should be managed. Six years later Damien got married and decided it was time to move back to California to be closer to his family and to raise a family of his own. He left Bridgewater in 2013 after a successful nine‐year career and took 10 months off to travel to 23 countries on an extended honeymoon. Damien joined me when I departed Merrill Lynch after 15 years, and we launched our own firm, Advanced Research Investment Solutions (ARIS), in 2014. This marked another major inflection point in my career.
ARIS managed over $12 billion in client assets for many years and was consistently ranked among the top advisory firms in the country by Barron’s.1 We implemented the investment framework, which was described in my first book, across our client portfolios. Five years after founding ARIS, we created the Advanced Research Risk Parity Index as a proxy for the investment approach. This allowed us to back test and publish the results over a long period of time through shifting economic environments.
This brings us to the present. The reason I wrote this book is to describe the thought process that has led our journey to risk parity. My goal is to memorialize our learning over the past 15 years in simple‐to‐understand, nontechnical language that anyone who is interested in investing can absorb. I begin with bigger‐picture topics and work my way down to the details. For those who enjoyed my first book, this may essentially be viewed as a second, more refined edition that is tailored for the specific risk parity index that we created. I strive to present this information to you so you can objectively decide for yourself whether the framework is sound.
The book is divided into the following chapters:
Chapter 1
describes the conceptual framework for risk parity. I will explain what it means to be well balanced and why the conventional portfolio is surprisingly poorly balanced.
Chapter 2
gets into the two required steps to build balance: (1) selecting the right asset classes, and (2) structuring each to have similar returns.
Chapters 3
–
7
dive into the major asset classes used in our risk parity model. I explain what they are, how they perform in different economic environments, and their role in a balanced mix of assets.
Chapter 8
lays out the details of our risk parity portfolio, including the desired weighting to each asset class and, most important, the rationale for the specific allocation.
The Risk Parity Portfolio
25% global equities
25% commodities (15% commodity producer equities, 10% gold)
35% long‐term Treasuries
35% long‐term TIPS
Chapter 9
provides a long‐term historical return series to show how the risk parity portfolio would have performed through varying market environments.
Chapter 10
covers the timeliness of the risk parity approach. Given the wide range of potential economic outcomes looking forward, today appears to be a prudent time for investors to maintain strong balance.
Chapter 11
gets into the “rebalancing boost,” which refers to the increase in returns that comes from a repeated process of buying low and selling high.
Chapter 12
covers implementation strategies to put the concepts into practice.
Chapter 13
points out the unique environments during which the risk parity portfolio may be expected to perform poorly. I think of this chapter as a “Break in Case of Emergency” warning. It serves as a reminder to adopters of risk parity to read this section if tempted to abandon the strategy.
Chapter 14
summarizes my responses to the most commonly raised questions and objections I've heard about risk parity over the past 15 years.
Chapter 15
offers some concluding remarks.
NOTE
1
The
Barron
's Top RIA Firms rankings are based on data provided by over 4,000 of the nation's most productive advisors. Factors used in the rankings include: assets under management, revenue produced for the firm, regulatory record, technology spending, staff diversity, succession planning, quality of practice, and philanthropic work. Investment performance isn't an explicit component because not all advisors have audited results and because performance figures often are influenced more by clients' risk tolerance than by an advisor's investment‐picking abilities. Barron's is a registered trademark of Dow Jones & Company, L.P. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER ONEWhat Is Risk Parity?
Ray Dalio, Bob Prince and their team at Bridgewater pioneered most of the concepts presented in this book about 30 years ago and have been successfully refining and implementing the strategy ever since. Our risk parity mix uses the same overall framework as Bridgewater's, although the specific asset classes and allocation represent a simplified version. Our approach also differs slightly as it is designed for a wide range of investors, many of whom are subject to paying taxes, as opposed to being tailored for the largest tax‐exempt institutions in the world. This also represents our best thinking as of this writing. As previously stated, we hope to continue to evolve our understanding and make improvements in future iterations.
RISK PARITY IS ALL ABOUT BALANCE
The ultimate goal of a risk parity portfolio is to earn attractive equity‐like returns while taking less risk than equities. Both objectives are important. We want good absolute returns (competitive with equities) over the long run since that is the main purpose behind investing capital. Controlling risk is also paramount because losses are painful and can be difficult to recover from, both mathematically and emotionally. A portfolio that achieves attractive returns while minimizing risk can be constructed with a well‐balanced allocation that invests in public market securities, which will be the focus here.
The operative term is balance. Webster's dictionary defines balance as a “state in which different things have an equal or proper amount of importance.” Ideally, we should seek balance in all aspects of life. From the most basic level, we hope to equally distribute our weight so we can stand upright without falling. We should probably also strive to maintain a balanced diet or appropriate work‐life balance. Many of us have discovered that excessive and prolonged imbalance in these areas often ends in a painful outcome that forces us back toward better balance.
Within the context of an investment portfolio, balance has a comparable connotation and is similarly important. In a portfolio, balance means giving similar importance, or weight, to asset classes that behave differently from each other. A balanced portfolio has some assets that perform well when others perform poorly. As a result, the portfolio is not overly exposed or vulnerable to a particular market or economic outcome. Instead, no matter what happens, the portfolio is reasonably well protected. This is what it means to have a “well‐diversified” portfolio. A diversified portfolio is one that minimizes risk for a given level of return. Said differently, the objective is to take risk efficiently so that we don't take unnecessary risk when a similar return can be earned through a smoother path that experiences less frequent and less severe drawdowns.
A Smoother Path
Starting from a high‐level conceptual framework, a smoother path can be attained by investing across a wide range of return streams that are different from one another. By different, I mean that while they all go up over time, their ups and downs generally do not coincide. As a result, a total portfolio that is made up of these fluctuating constituents should exhibit less variability over time than any single one of them. This is the core insight of Modern Portfolio Theory, which posits that a portfolio made up of diverse components can exhibit less risk for a given level of return than a less diversified mix. The bold line in Figure 1.1 illustrates the conceptual idea of a smoother path – one that takes less risk to earn a similar return.
If we strive to grow the portfolio from Point A to Point B, allocating across multiple assets that all end at Point B but proceed through different paths yields a less bumpy ride for the total portfolio. A good metaphor for this framework is an automobile engine. The engine is made up of a diverse mix of parts: pistons, cylinders, chains, spark plugs, crankshafts, valves, and so on. Each component is necessary and functions very differently from the other parts. Each has a pre‐defined role to ensure smooth operation for the whole. If you were to view the inside of a properly designed and constructed engine block, you would observe chaos as various pieces would be operating in different directions and at a varying pace. Yet, the finely tuned machine purrs along smoothly when viewed from the outside. I believe we can build portfolios using a similar construct.
Figure 1.1 Building a Smoother Path
Ray famously referred to this investment approach as “the holy grail.” If investors are able to identify 10 good, uncorrelated investments and split their portfolio roughly equally among them, then they could enjoy attractive returns with low risk. The concept is supported by the notion that when one investment is doing well, another may be underperforming, and they can balance each other out to yield a return closer to the average of the two. Including more uncorrelated return streams would drastically reduce the total risk of the portfolio.
