94,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Fachliteratur
- Serie: Aerospace Series (PEP)
- Sprache: Englisch
Small Unmanned Fixed-wing Aircraft Design is the essential guide to designing, building and testing fixed wing UAVs (or drones). It deals with aircraft from two to 150 kg in weight and is based on the first-hand experiences of the world renowned UAV team at the UK's University of Southampton. The book covers both the practical aspects of designing, manufacturing and flight testing and outlines and the essential calculations needed to underpin successful designs. It describes the entire process of UAV design from requirements definition to configuration layout and sizing, through preliminary design and analysis using simple panel codes and spreadsheets to full CFD and FEA models and on to detailed design with parametric CAD tools. Its focus is on modest cost approaches that draw heavily on the latest digital design and manufacturing methods, including a strong emphasis on utilizing off-the-shelf components, low cost analysis, automated geometry modelling and 3D printing. It deliberately avoids a deep theoretical coverage of aerodynamics or structural mechanics; rather it provides a design team with sufficient insights and guidance to get the essentials undertaken more pragmatically. The book contains many all-colour illustrations of the dozens of aircraft built by the authors and their students over the last ten years giving much detailed information on what works best. It is predominantly aimed at under-graduate and MSc level student design and build projects, but will be of interest to anyone engaged in the practical problems of getting quite complex unmanned aircraft flying. It should also appeal to the more sophisticated aero-modeller and those engaged on research based around fixed wing UAVs.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 667
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017
Ähnliche
Table of Contents
Cover
Related titles
Related titles
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
List of Figures
List of Tables
Foreword
Series Preface
Preface
Acknowledgments
Part I: Introducing Fixed-Wing UAVs
Chapter 1: Preliminaries
1.1 Externally Sourced Components
1.2 Manufacturing Methods
1.3 Project DECODE
1.4 The Stages of Design
1.5 Summary
Chapter 2: Unmanned Air Vehicles
2.1 A Brief Taxonomy of UAVs
2.2 The Morphology of a UAV
2.3 Main Design Drivers
Part II: The Aircraft in More Detail
Chapter 3: Wings
3.1 Simple Wing Theory and Aerodynamic Shape
3.2 Spars
3.3 Covers
3.4 Ribs
3.5 Fuselage Attachments
3.6 Ailerons/Roll Control
3.7 Flaps
3.8 Wing Tips
3.9 Wing-housed Retractable Undercarriage
3.10 Integral Fuel Tanks
Chapter 4: Fuselages and Tails (Empennage)
4.1 Main Fuselage/Nacelle Structure
4.2 Wing Attachment
4.3 Engine and Motor Mountings
4.4 Avionics Trays
4.5 Payloads – Camera Mountings
4.6 Integral Fuel Tanks
4.7 Assembly Mechanisms and Access Hatches
4.8 Undercarriage Attachment
4.9 Tails (Empennage)
Chapter 5: Propulsion
5.1 Liquid-Fueled IC Engines
5.2 Rare-earth Brushless Electric Motors
5.3 Propellers
5.4 Engine/Motor Control
5.5 Fuel Systems
5.6 Batteries and Generators
Chapter 6: Airframe Avionics and Systems
6.1 Primary Control Transmitter and Receivers
6.2 Avionics Power Supplies
6.3 Servos
6.4 Wiring, Buses, and Boards
6.5 Autopilots
6.6 Payload Communications Systems
6.7 Ancillaries
6.8 Resilience and Redundancy
Chapter 7: Undercarriages
7.1 Wheels
7.2 Suspension
7.3 Steering
7.4 Retractable Systems
Part III: Designing UAVs
Chapter 8: The Process of Design
8.1 Goals and Constraints
8.2 Airworthiness
8.3 Likely Failure Modes
8.4 Systems Engineering
Chapter 9: Tool Selection
9.1 Geometry/CAD Codes
9.2 Concept Design
9.3 Operational Simulation and Mission Planning
9.4 Aerodynamic and Structural Analysis Codes
9.5 Design and Decision Viewing
9.6 Supporting Databases
Chapter 10: Concept Design: Initial Constraint Analysis
10.1 The Design Brief
10.2 Airframe Topology
10.3 Airframe and Powerplant Scaling via Constraint Analysis
10.4 A Parametric Constraint Analysis Report
10.5 The Combined Constraint Diagram and Its Place in the Design Process
Chapter 11: Spreadsheet-Based Concept Design and Examples
11.1 Concept Design Algorithm
11.2 Range
11.3 Structural Loading Calculations
11.4 Weight and CoG Estimation
11.5 Longitudinal Stability
11.6 Powering and Propeller Sizing
11.7 Resulting Design: Decode-1
11.8 A Bigger Single Engine Design: Decode-2
11.9 A Twin Tractor Design: SPOTTER
Chapter 12: Preliminary Geometry Design
12.1 Preliminary Airframe Geometry and CAD
12.2 Designing Decode-1 with AirCONICS
Chapter 13: Preliminary Aerodynamic and Stability Analysis
13.1 Panel Method Solvers – XFoil and XFLR5
13.2 RANS Solvers – Fluent
13.3 Example Two-dimensional Airfoil Analysis
13.4 Example Three-dimensional Airfoil Analysis
13.5 3D Models of Simple Wings
13.6 Example Airframe Aerodynamics
Chapter 14: Preliminary Structural Analysis
14.1 Structural Modeling Using AirCONICS
14.2 Structural Analysis Using Simple Beam Theory
14.3 Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
14.4 Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity
14.5 Summary of Preliminary Structural Analysis
Chapter 15: Weight and Center of Gravity Control
15.1 Weight Control
15.2 Longitudinal Center of Gravity Control
Chapter 16: Experimental Testing and Validation
16.1 Wind Tunnels Tests
16.2 Airframe Load Tests
16.3 Avionics Testing
Chapter 17: Detail Design: Constructing Explicit Design Geometry
17.1 The Generation of Geometry
17.2 Fuselage
17.3 An Example UAV Assembly
17.4 3D Printed Parts
17.5 Wings
Part IV: Manufacture and Flight
Chapter 18: Manufacture
18.1 Externally Sourced Components
18.2 Three-Dimensional Printing
18.3 Hot-wire Foam Cutting
18.4 Laser Cutting
18.5 Wiring Looms
18.6 Assembly Mechanisms
18.7 Storage and Transport Cases
Chapter 19: Regulatory Approval and Documentation
19.1 Aviation Authority Requirements
19.2 System Description
19.3 Operations Manual
19.4 Safety Case
19.5 Flight Planning Manual
Chapter 20: Test Flights and Maintenance
20.1 Test Flight Planning
20.2 Test Flight Examples
20.3 Maintenance
Chapter 21: Lessons Learned
21.1 Things that Have Gone Wrong and Why
Part V: Appendices, Bibliography, and Index
Appendix A: Generic Aircraft Design Flowchart
Appendix B: Example AirCONICS Code for Decode-1
Appendix C: Worked (Manned Aircraft) Detail Design Example
C.1 Stage 1: Concept Sketches
C.2 Stage 2: Part Definition
C.3 Stage 3: “Flying Surfaces”
C.4 Stage 4: Other Items
C.5 Stage 5: Detail Definition
Bibliography
Index
End User License Agreement
Pages
2
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
xxi
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
xxv
xxvi
xxvii
xxviii
xxix
xxx
xxxi
xxxiii
xxxiv
xxxv
xxxvii
xxxix
xl
xli
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
189
190
191
192
193
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
329
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
393
395
396
397
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
Guide
Cover
Table of Contents
Foreword
Preface
Part I: Introducing Fixed-Wing UAVs
Begin Reading
List of Illustrations
Chapter 1: Preliminaries
Figure 1.1 The University of Southampton UAV team with eight of our aircraft, March 2015.
Figure 1.2 The design spiral.
Chapter 2: Unmanned Air Vehicles
Figure 2.1 The Southampton University SPOTTER aircraft at the 2016 Farnborough International Airshow.
Figure 2.2 University of Southampton SPOTTER UAV with under-slung payload pod.
Figure 2.3 Integral fuel tank with trailing edge flap and main spars.
Figure 2.4 A typical carbon spar and foam wing with SLS nylon ribs at key locations (note the separate aileron and flap with associated servo linkages).
Figure 2.5 A typical SLS structural component.
Figure 2.6 A typical integral fuel tank.
Figure 2.7 Typical telemetry data recorded by an autopilot.
Figure 2.8 Flight tracks of the SPOTTER aircraft while carrying out automated takeoff and landing tests. A total of 23 fully automated flights totaling 55 km of flying is shown.
Figure 2.9 A typical UAV wiring diagram.
Figure 2.10 The SkyCircuits SC2 autopilot (removed from its case).
Figure 2.11 University of Southampton SPOTTER UAV with under-slung maritime flight releasable AUV.
Chapter 3: Wings
Figure 3.1 Variation of airfoil section drag at zero lift with section Reynolds number and thickness-to-chord ratio.
Figure 3.2 A UAV with significant FDM ABS winglets (this aircraft also has Custer ducted fans).
Figure 3.3 Wing foam core prior to covering or rib insertion – note strengthened section in way of main wing spar.
Figure 3.4 Covered wing with spar and rib – in this case, the rib just acts to transfer the wing twisting moment while the spar is bonded directly to the foam without additional strengthening.
Figure 3.5 A SPOTTER UAV wing spar under static sandbag test.
Figure 3.6 SLS nylon wing rib with spar hole – note the extended load transfer elements that are bonded to the main foam parts of the wing and also flap hinge point.
Figure 3.7 Two wing foam cores with end rib and spar inserted – note in this case the rib does not extend to the rear of the section, as a separate wing morphing mechanism will be fitted to the rear of the wing.
Figure 3.8 SPOTTER UAV wing under construction showing the two-part aileron plus flap, all hinged off a common rear wing spar – note also the nylon torque peg on the rib nearest the camera.
Figure 3.9 UAV that uses wing warping for roll control.
Figure 3.10 UAV that uses tiperons for roll control.
Figure 3.11 Fowler flap – note the complex mechanism required to deploy the flap.
Figure 3.12 Simple FDM-printed wing tip incorporated into the outermost wing rib.
Figure 3.13 UAV with pneumatically retractable undercarriage – the main wheels retract into the wings while the nose wheel tucks up under the fuselage (wing cut-out shown prior to undercarriage installation).
Figure 3.14 Integral fuel tank in central wing section for SPOTTER UAV.
Chapter 4: Fuselages and Tails (Empennage)
Figure 4.1 SPOTTER SLS nylon engine nacelle/fuselage and interior structure.
Figure 4.2 Bayonet system for access to internal avionics (a) and fuselage-mounted switch and voltage indicators (b).
Figure 4.3 Load spreader plate on Mylar-clad foam core aileron.
Figure 4.4 Commercially produced model aircraft with foam fuselage (and wings).
Figure 4.5 Space frame structure made of CFRP tubes with SLS nylon joints and foam cladding.
Figure 4.6 DECODE aircraft with modular fuselage elements.
Figure 4.7 Wing attachment on SPOTTER fuselage. Note the recess for square torque peg with locking pin between main and rear spar holes.
Figure 4.8 Typical engine and motor mounts for SLS nylon fuselages and nacelles. Note the steel engine bearer in first view, engine hours meter in second image, and vibration isolation in third setup.
Figure 4.9 Frustratingly small fuselage access hatch.
Figure 4.10 Typical plywood avionics boards with equipment mounted. Note dual layer system with antivibration mounts in last image.
Figure 4.11 SULSA forward-looking video camera.
Figure 4.12 SPOTTER payload pods with fixed aperture for video camera (a) and downward and sideways cameras (b and c).
Figure 4.13 Simple two axis gimbal system and Hero2 video camera mounted in front of nose wheel.
Figure 4.14 Three-axis gimbal system and Sony video camera mounted in front of the nose wheel. Note the video receiver system on the bench that links to the camera via a dedicated radio channel.
Figure 4.15 SPOTTER integral fuel tank. Note internal baffle and very small breather port (top left) in the close-up view of the filler neck.
Figure 4.16 Aircraft with SLS nylon fuselage formed in three parts: front camera section attached by bayonet to rear two sections joined by tension rods. Note the steel tension rod inside the hull just behind bayonet in the right-hand image.
Figure 4.17 Example hatches in SLS nylon fuselages. Note the locking pins and location tabs on the right-hand hatch.
Figure 4.18 Metal-reinforced nose wheel attachment with steering and retract hinge in aluminum frame attached to SLS nylon fuselage. Note the nose wheel leg sized to protect the antenna.
Figure 4.19 Nylon nose wheel attachment. Note the significant reinforcement around the lower and upper strut bearings.
Figure 4.20 Tails attached directly to the fuselage. The right-hand aircraft is a heavily modified commercial kit used for piggy-back launches of gliders.
Figure 4.21 Tails attached using CFRP booms, both circular and square in cross-section.
Figure 4.22 All-moving horizontal stabilizer with port/starboard split to augment roll control and provide redundancy.
Figure 4.23 SLS nylon part to attach tail surfaces to a CFRP tail boom.
Chapter 5: Propulsion
Figure 5.1 UAV engine/electric motor/propeller test cell. Note the starter generator on the engine behind the four-bladed propeller.
Figure 5.2 UAV engine dynamometer.
Figure 5.3 Typical maximum powers, weights, and estimated peak static thrusts of engines for UAVs in the 2–150 kg MTOW range.
Figure 5.4 OS Gemini FT-160 glow-plug engine in pusher configuration. Note the permanent wiring for glow-plugs.
Figure 5.5 OS 30 cc GF30 four-stroke engine installed in a hybrid powered UAV. Note the significant size of the exhaust system.
Figure 5.6 Saito 57 cc twin four-stroke engine in pusher configuration. Note the pancake starter generator fitted to this engine.
Figure 5.7 Twin 3W-28i CS single-cylinder two-stroke engines fitted to 2Seas UAV. Note again the significant size of the exhaust systems.
Figure 5.8 Twin OS 40 cc GF40 four-stroke engines installed in SPOTTER UAV, with and without engine cowlings.
Figure 5.9 Raw performance data taken from an engine under test in our dynamometer.
Figure 5.10 Hacker brushless electric motor.
Figure 5.11 Outputs from JavaProp “multi analysis” for a propeller operating at fixed torque. Note the differing horizontal scales.
Figure 5.12 Large UAV fuel tanks. Note clunks and fuel level sensor fitting at rear left-hand corner of one tank.
Figure 5.13 SPOTTER fuel tank level sensors. One sensor lies behind the central flap in the upper wider part of the tank (just visible in the right-hand image), while the second one lies at the bottom just above the payload interface.
Figure 5.14 Engine-powered brushless generators driven directly or by toothed belt.
Chapter 6: Airframe Avionics and Systems
Figure 6.1 Outline avionics diagram for SPOTTER UAV.
Figure 6.2 Outline avionics diagram for SPOTTER UAV (detail) – note switch-over unit linking dual receivers and dual autopilots.
Figure 6.3 Typical avionics boards. Note the use of MilSpec connectors (the Futaba receivers are marked 1, the switch-over unit 2, the SC2 autopilot and GPS antenna 3, and the avionics and ignition batteries 4 and 5, respectively).
Figure 6.4 Fuselage with externally visible LED voltage monitor strips. Here, one is for the avionics system and the second for the ignition system.
Figure 6.5 Aircraft with twin on-board, belt-driven generators as supplied by the UAV Factory and a close-up of UAV Factory system.
Figure 6.6 On-board, belt-driven brushless motor used as generators.
Figure 6.7 Aircraft with a Sullivan pancake starter–generator system.
Figure 6.8 A selection of aircraft servos from three different manufacturers.
Figure 6.9 Variation of servo torque with weight for various manuafcturers' servos.
Figure 6.10 SPOTTER aircraft showing multiple redundant ailerons and elevators.
Figure 6.11 Servo cut-out in wing with SLS nylon reinforcement box.
Figure 6.12 Typical servo linkage. Note the servo arm, linkage, and servo horn (with reinforcing pad).
Figure 6.13 SPOTTER “iron bird” test harness layout. Note the full-size airframe drawing placed under the wiring.
Figure 6.14 Generator and drive motor for “iron bird” testing.
Figure 6.15 SPOTTER “iron bird” with resulting professionally built harness in place.
Figure 6.16 Decode-1 “iron bird” with harness that uses simple aero-modeler-based cable connections.
Figure 6.17 Baseboard with mil spec connections on left- and right-hand edges. Note SkyCircuits SC2 autopilot fitted top right with GPS antenna on top and switch-over unit in the center with very many wiring connections.
Figure 6.18 Laser-cut plywood baseboards.
Figure 6.19 Components located directly into 3D SLS nylon printed structure. The servo is screwed to a clip-in SLS part, while the motor is bolted directly to the fuselage.
Figure 6.20 Basic Arduino Uno autopilot components including GPS module on extension board, and accelerometer, barometer and three-axis gyro on daughter boards.
Figure 6.21 Pixhawk autopilot.
Figure 6.22 The SkyCircuits SC2 autopilot (removed from its case (a), and with attached aerials and servo connection daughter board (b). See also Figure 6.3, where the SC2 is fitted with its case and a GPS aerial on top).
Figure 6.23 A selection of professional-grade 5.8 GHz video radiolink equipment: (front) transmitter with omnidirectional antenna in ruggedized case, and (rear left to right) receiver, directional antenna, and combined receiver/high intensity screen unit.
Figure 6.24 A hobby-grade 5.8 GHz video radiolink: (a) receiver with omni-directional antenna and (b) transmitter with similar unclad antenna and attached mini-camera.
Figure 6.25 Futaba s-bus telemetry modules:(clockwise from left) temperature sensor, rpm sensor, and GPS receiver.
Chapter 7: Undercarriages
Figure 7.1 Some typical small UAV undercarriages.
Figure 7.2 An aircraft with spats fitted to its main wheels to reduce drag.
Figure 7.3 Nose wheel and strut showing suspension elements, main bearings, control servo, and caster.
Figure 7.4 Tail wheel showing suspension spring.
Figure 7.5 Nose wheel mechanism with combined spring-coupled steering and vertical suspension spring.
Figure 7.6 UAV with a pneumatic, fully retractable undercarriage system.
Figure 7.7 Details of fully retractable undercarriage system.
Chapter 8: The Process of Design
Figure 8.1 Explosion of information content as design progresses.
Figure 8.2 2SEAS aircraft with redundant ailerons and elevators.
Figure 8.3 Autopilot system on vibration test.
Figure 8.4 Treble isolated engine mounting.
Figure 8.5 Typical military UAV work-breakdown structure interface definitions, from MIL-HDBK-881C for UAVs.
Figure 8.6 Example military system requirements flowdown [13].
Figure 8.7 Systems engineering “V” model.
Figure 8.8 Weight prediction of SPOTTER UAV.
Figure 8.9 Pie chart plots of SPOTTER weight.
Figure 8.10 Example weight and cost breakdown.
Chapter 9: Tool Selection
Figure 9.1 Outline design workflow.
Figure 9.2 Analysis tool logic.
Figure 9.3 Mission analysis using the AnyLogic event-driven simulation environment.
Chapter 10: Concept Design: Initial Constraint Analysis
Figure 10.1 On May 14, 1954, Boeing officially rolled out the Dash-80, the prototype of the company's 707 jet transport.
Figure 10.2 Four semi-randomly chosen points in an immense space of unmanned aircraft topologies: (starting at the top) the Scaled Composites Proteus, the NASA Prandtl-D research aircraft, the AeroVironment RQ-11 Raven, and the NASA Helios (images courtesy of NASA and the USAF).
Figure 10.3 Minimum mass cantilever designed to carry a point load.
Figure 10.4 NASA oblique-wing research aircraft (images courtesy of NASA). Could your design benefit from asymmetry?
Figure 10.5 Multifunctionality: the 3D-printed fuel tank (highlighted) of the SPOTTER unmanned aircraft does not only hold the fuel (with integral baffles) but also generates lift and it has a structural role too, see also Figures 2.3, 2.6, and 3.14
Figure 10.6 Typical constraint diagram. Each constraint “bites” a chunk out of the versus space; whatever is left is the feasible region, wherein the design will have to be positioned.
Chapter 11: Spreadsheet-Based Concept Design and Examples
Figure 11.1 Decode-1 in the R.J. Mitchell wind tunnel with wheels and wing tips removed and electric motor for propeller drive.
Figure 11.2 Decode-1 in flight with nose camera fitted.
Figure 11.3 Decode-1 spreadsheet snapshot – inputs page.
Figure 11.5 Decode-1 spreadsheet snapshot – geometry page.
Figure 11.6 Decode-1 outer geometry as generated with the AirCONICS tool suite.
Figure 11.7 Decode-2 spreadsheet snapshot.
Figure 11.8 Decode-2 in flight with nose camera fitted.
Figure 11.9 Decode-2 outer geometry as generated with the AirCONICS tool suite.
Figure 11.10 SPOTTER spreadsheet snapshot.
Figure 11.11 SPOTTER in flight with payload pod fitted.
Figure 11.12 SPOTTER outer geometry as generated with the AirCONICS tool suite.
Chapter 12: Preliminary Geometry Design
Figure 12.1 Basic AirCONICS airframe geometry for a single tractor engine, twin-boom, H-tail design.
Figure 12.2 AirCONICS model of complete Decode-1 airframe with control surfaces, undercarriage, and propeller disk.
Chapter 13: Preliminary Aerodynamic and Stability Analysis
Figure 13.1 and streamline plot for the NACA0012 foil at angle of attack as computed with XFoil.
Figure 13.2 Results of XFoil analysis sweep for the NACA 64–201 foil at Mach 0.17 as computed with XFLR5.
Figure 13.3 Results of XFLR5 analysis sweep for a wing generated from the NACA 64–201 foil sections at Reynold's number of 4.4 million and Mach 0.17.
Figure 13.4 Convergence plot of two-dimensional
k
-ω SST RANS-based CFD analysis.
Figure 13.5 Pathlines and surface static pressure plot from Fluent RANS based CFD solution.
Figure 13.6 Section through a coarse-grained 3D Harpoon mesh for typical Spalart–Allmaras UAV wing model and close-up showing a boundary layer mesh.
Figure 13.7 Histogram of parameter for typical boundary layer mesh using the Spalart–Allmaras one-parameter turbulence model.
Figure 13.8 Histogram of parameter for typical boundary layer mesh using the SST turbulence model.
Figure 13.9 Lift versus drag polar for NAC0012 airfoil from XFoil and experiments.
Figure 13.10 Low-resolution NASA Langley 2D mesh around the NACA0012 foil.
Figure 13.11 Middle-resolution NASA Langley 2D mesh around the NACA0012 foil.
Figure 13.12 ICEM 2D mesh around the NACA0012 foil (courtesy of Dr D.J.J. Toal).
Figure 13.13 Experimental and 2D computational lift and drag data for the NACA0012 airfoil (using the SST turbulence model).
Figure 13.14 Computed two-dimensional flow past the NACA0012 foil when almost fully stalled.
Figure 13.15 Section through a fine-grained Harpoon 3D mesh around the NACA0012 foil suitable for the SST turbulence model. Note the wake mesh extending from the trailing edge.
Figure 13.16 Experimental and 3D computational lift and drag data for the NACA0012 airfoil (using the Spalart–Allmaras and SST turbulence models).
Figure 13.17 Experimental [20 22] and computational lift and drag data for the NACA 64–210 section. Source: Adapted from Abbott 1959.
Figure 13.18 Pathlines from a RANS solution for the NACA 64–210 airfoil at angle of attack. Note the reversed flow and large separation bubble on the upper surface.
Figure 13.19 Experimental and computational lift and drag data for the Sivells and Spooner [21] wing and for the SST Harpoon mesh.
Figure 13.20 XFLR5 model of the Sivells and Spooner wing.
Figure 13.21 Experimental and computational lift and drag data for the Sivells and Spooner [21] wing with enhanced SST Harpoon mesh of 76 million cells and for the enhanced mesh.
Figure 13.22 Pathlines and static pressure around the Sivells and Spooner [21] wing with enhanced SST Harpoon mesh at angle of attack.
Figure 13.23 XFLR5 model of Decode-1 airframe as generated by AirCONICS with main wing setting angle of and elevator setting angle of , at an angle of attack of and 30 m/s. Note the use of cambered sections for the main wing and symmetrical profiles for the elevator and fins. The green bars indicate the section lift, with the tail producing downforce to ensure pitch stability.
Figure 13.24 XFLR5-generated polar plot for Decode-1 airframe as generated by AirCONICS with main wing setting angle of and elevator setting angle of , showing speed variations from 15 to 30 m/s. The black circles indicate flight at an angle of attack of at which Cm is zero.
Figure 13.25 XFLR5-generated polar plot for Decode-1 airframe as generated by AirCONICS with main wing setting angle of and elevator setting angle of , showing speed variations from 15 to 30 m/s. Note that Cl is 0.28 and Cm is zero at an angle of attack of as required in the cruise condition.
Figure 13.26 XFLR5-generated polar plot for Decode-1 airframe at 30 m/s with main wing setting angle of , showing variations in center of gravity position by 100 mm, reduction in tail length by 300 mm, and elevator set at an angle of .
Figure 13.27 Time-domain simulation for XFLR5-generated eigenvalues at 30 m/s taken from Table 13.2 showing for the roll mode and for the spiral mode.
Figure 13.28 University of Southampton flight simulator.
Figure 13.29 Decode-1 mesh shown inside Harpoon along with wake surfaces and refinement zones.
Figure 13.30 Fluent mesh on the center plane for the Decode-1 airframe SST analysis at 30 m/s, together with resulting histogram.
Figure 13.31 Fluent convergence plot for Decode-1 whole aircraft model at 30 m/s.
Figure 13.32 Polar plot for Decode-1 airframe at 30 m/s showing both Fluent and XLFR5 results for lift and drag. Those for Fluent include results for just the lifting surfaces and with the complete airframe fuselage, control surfaces, and undercarriage gear; those for XFLR5 show also the impact of adding a fixed parasitic drag coefficient of 0.0375.
Figure 13.33 AirCONICS model of Decode-1 lifting surfaces.
Figure 13.34 AirCONICS model of complete Decode-1 airframe with control surfaces, undercarriage, and propeller disk.
Figure 13.35 Streamlines colored by velocity magnitude around the complete Decode-1 airframe with deflected ailerons.
Chapter 14: Preliminary Structural Analysis
Figure 14.1 Typical composite Vn diagram for gust and maneuver loads on a small UAV (here for Decode-1 assuming maneuver load factors of +5 and
2, 9.1 m/s gust velocity, and a dive speed of 160% of the cruise speed).
Figure 14.2 Breakdown of Decode-1 outer mold line model into individual components for structural modeling.
Figure 14.3 Decode-1 components that will be produced by 3D printing or made from laser-cut ply.
Figure 14.4 Deflection and slope variations for the Decode-1 main spar when flying at 30 m/s and an angle of attack of using loading taken from XFLR5, a load factor of , and simple beam theory analysis. The spar is assumed to be made from a circular CFRP section of outer diameter 20 mm, wall thickness 2 mm, Young's modulus of 70 GPa, and extending the full span of the aircraft, being clamped on the center plane.
Figure 14.5 Preliminary spar layout for Decode-1. Here the linking parts are taken directly from AirCONICS without being reduced to either thick-walled or thin-walled rib-reinforced structures.
Figure 14.6 Simplified Abaqus® main spar model with solid SLS nylon supports for Decode-1, showing subdivided spar and boundary conditions for a maneuver loading.
Figure 14.7 Deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for Decode-1 main spar under flight loads using a uniform spar load. The tip deflection is 189.7 mm.
Figure 14.8 Abaqus loading for full Decode-1 spar model under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity.
Figure 14.9 Deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for full Decode-1 spar model under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity. The main spar tip deflections are 143.9 mm, the elevator spar tip deflections are 10.8 mm, and the fin spar tip deflections are 11.1 mm.
Figure 14.10 Further details of the deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for full Decode-1 spar model under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity.
Figure 14.11 Deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for nylon support part in full Decode-1 spar model under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity.
Figure 14.12 Deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for full Decode-1 spar model with locally refined mesh under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity.
Figure 14.13 Deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for full Decode-1 spar model with fully refined mesh and reduced boundary conditions under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity.
Figure 14.14 Simplified Abaqus thick-walled structural model for Decode-1 SLS nylon part. The mesh for this part contains 25 000 elements.
Figure 14.15 Deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for thick-walled nylon part in full Decode-1 spar model with fully refined mesh and reduced boundary conditions under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity.
Figure 14.16 Deformed shape and von Mises stress plot for 2 mm thick-walled nylon part in full Decode-1 spar model with fully refined mesh and reduced boundary conditions under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5 together with a load factor of plus elevator and fin loading based on Cl values of unity.
Figure 14.17 Abaqus model of foam core created with CAD shell and fillet commands and meshed with brick hex elements.
Figure 14.18 Abaqus model of glass-fiber wing cover created with CAD shell commands and meshed with continuum shell hex elements. Note the wedge elements used for the sharp trailing edge.
Figure 14.19 Abaqus assembly with foam parts added, highlighting the tie constraint between the foam and the SLS nylon support.
Figure 14.20 Pressure map on Decode-1 foam part under wing flight loads taken from XFLR5.
Figure 14.21 Resulting deflections and stresses in foam core and cover for wing under flight conditions.
Figure 14.22 Resulting deflections and stresses in SLS nylon part with foam mounting lug for wing under flight conditions.
Figure 14.23 Two-degrees-of-freedom model of wing aeroelasticity.
Figure 14.24 Truncated Abaqus contour plot of a first twist mode revealing the nodal line and hence the elastic axis.
Figure 14.25 Abaqus plots of first flap and twist modes for Decode-1 wing.
Chapter 15: Weight and Center of Gravity Control
Figure 15.1 Channel wing aircraft being weighed after final assembly.
Chapter 16: Experimental Testing and Validation
Figure 16.1 Decode-1 and channel wings on wind tunnel mounting rig. Note the circular boundary plate that stands in for the absent fuselage.
Figure 16.2 AirCONICS model of Decode-1 airframe in a representation of the R.J. Mitchell 11' 8' wind tunnel working section at Southampton University, illustrating degree of blockage.
Figure 16.3 AirCONICS half-model of Decode-1 airframe in the R.J. Mitchell 11' 8' wind tunnel prior to mesh preparation.
Figure 16.4 Section through Fluent velocity magnitude results and Harpoon mesh for Decode-1 airframe in the R.J. Mitchell 11'
8' wind tunnel.
Figure 16.5 Decode-1 baseline wind tunnel results (control surfaces in neutral positions) under varying wind speed. (a) Lift coefficient. (b) Drag coefficient. (c) Side coefficient. (d) Pitch coefficient. (e) Roll coefficient. (f) Yaw coefficient.
Figure 16.6 Decode-1 elevator effectiveness with varying deflection angles and wind speed. (a) Lift coefficient at 15 m/s. (b) Drag coefficient at 15 m/s. (c) Pitch coefficient at 10 m/s. (d) Pitch coefficient at 15 m/s. (e) Pitch coefficient at 24 m/s.
Figure 16.7 Decode-1 rudder effectiveness with varying deflection angle. (a) Lift coefficient at 24 m/s. (b) Drag coefficient at 24 m/s. (c) Side coefficient at 24 m/s. (d) Pitch coefficient at 24 m/s. (e) Roll coefficient at 24 m/s. (f) Yaw coefficient at 24 m/s.
Figure 16.8 Dial gauge in use to measure aiframe deflection during static test in the lab.
Figure 16.9 Lab-quality force transducer, piezoelectric accelerometers, and electromagnetic shakers.
Figure 16.10 Flight-capable piezoelectric accelerometer and data-capture system.
Figure 16.11 Mounting system for wing and main spar assembly under sandbag load test.
Figure 16.12 Clamping system for main spar.
Figure 16.13 Wing assembly under sandbag load test.
Figure 16.14 Partial failure of SLS nylon structural component during sandbag load test. Note the significant cracks and large deformations.
Figure 16.15 Load testing of an undercarriage leg and associated SLS nylon mounting structure. Note the dummy carbon-fiber tubes present to allow the SLS structure to be correctly set up.
Figure 16.16 Ground vibration test of a Decode-1 wing showing support and mounting arrangements.
Figure 16.17 Ground vibration test of a Decode-1 wing ((a) accelerometer on starboard wing tip: (b) shaker and force transducer near wing root).
Figure 16.18 Frequency response from ground vibration test of a Decode-1 wing: accelerometer on port wing tip and cursors on first flap mode.
Figure 16.19 Frequency response from ground vibration test of a Decode-1 wing: flapping mode accelerometer placement (upper) and twisting mode placement (lower), cursors on first twist mode.
Figure 16.20 SPOTTER iron-bird being used to test a complete avionics build-up: note motors to spin generators in a realistic manner.
Figure 16.21 Avionics board under vibration test. Note the free-free mounting simulated by elastic band supports. In this case, a force transducer has been placed between the shaker and the long connecting rod that stimulates the board. The in-built accelerometer in the flight controller is used to register motions.
Figure 16.22 Typical Servo test equipment: (front left to right) simple low-cost tester, large servo, motor speed tester with in-built power meter, and servo control output; (rear) avionics battery and standard primary receiver.
Chapter 17: Detail Design: Constructing Explicit Design Geometry
Figure 17.1 Detail design process flow.
Figure 17.2 The structure of well-partitioned concept design models.
Figure 17.3 Example configuration studies.
Figure 17.4 Example 3D models of Rotax aircraft engine and RCV UAV engine.
Figure 17.5 Example of images used to create realistic looking 3D Solidworks geometry model.
Figure 17.6 2D side elevations of Rotax aircraft engine and RCV UAV engine.
Figure 17.7 Scaling dimension added to drawing (mm).
Figure 17.8 “Spaceframe” aircraft structure.
Figure 17.9 Illustrative student UAV assembly.
Figure 17.10 UAV assembly model can be modified by changing design table parameters.
Figure 17.11 Plan and side view hand sketches.
Figure 17.12 Hand sketch scaled and positioned orthogonally in Solidworks.
Figure 17.13 Exact, dimensioned sketch being created on hand-sketch outline.
Figure 17.14 The “master” driving sketches in the assembly.
Figure 17.15 Design table for example UAV.
Figure 17.16 Input reference geometry.
Figure 17.17 The input geometry modeled as partitioned parts.
Figure 17.18 The assembly generated from reference geometry.
Figure 17.19 “Debugging” the detailed model.
Figure 17.20 Trimming of boom tube fairing.
Figure 17.21 Final detailed model.
Figure 17.22 Multipanel wing of PA-28. Photo courtesy Bob Adams https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ – no copyright is asserted by the inclusion of this image.
Figure 17.23 NACA four-digit section coordinate spreadsheet.
Figure 17.24 Curve importing in Solidworks.
Figure 17.25 Use of “convert entities” in Solidworks.
Figure 17.26 Closing the 2D aerofoil shape.
Figure 17.27 Deleting sketch relationship with reference geometry.
Figure 17.28 Reference geometry.
Figure 17.29 Constraining curve to reference “scaffold” geometry.
Figure 17.30 “3D” scaffold to define the relative positions in space of two independently scalable wing sections.
Figure 17.31 Wing surface with span, twist, taper, and sweep variables.
Figure 17.32 Multipanel wing.
Figure 17.33 Example of a double-curvature composite wing.
Figure 17.34 Fabricated wing structures.
Figure 17.35 Simple wooden rib and alloy spar structure.
Figure 17.36 Parametric wing structure.
Chapter 18: Manufacture
Figure 18.1 3D SLS nylon parts as supplied from the manufacturer.
Figure 18.2 3D SLS stainless steel gasoline engine bearer after printing and in situ.
Figure 18.3 3D SLS nylon manufacturing and depowdering.
Figure 18.4 Small office-based FDM printer. Parts as they appear on the platten and after removal of support material.
Figure 18.5 FDM-printed ABS fuselage parts.
Figure 18.6 Aircraft with FDM-printed fuselage and wing tips.
Figure 18.7 In-house manufactured hot-wire foam cutting machine. This cuts blocks of foam up to 1400 mm 590 mm 320 mm.
Figure 18.8 Large hot-wire foam cutting machine.
Figure 18.9 Hot-wire-cut foam wing parts: (Left) The original material blocks with and without cores removed; (right) with FDM-manufactured ABS joining parts.
Figure 18.10 Foam wings after cladding: glass fiber, Mylar, and filled glass fiber.
Figure 18.11 Aircraft with wings fabricated from laser-cut plywood covered with aero-modeler film.
Figure 18.12 Avionics base board and servo horn reinforcement made from laser cut plywood.
Figure 18.13 Foam reinforcement ribs made from laser-cut plywood.
Figure 18.14 Logical wiring diagram (detail).
Figure 18.15 Iron bird for building wiring looms.
Figure 18.16 Soldering station (note the clamps, heat-resistant mat, and good illumination).
Figure 18.17 Female and male bayonet produced in SLS nylon with quick-release locking pin.
Figure 18.18 Quick-release pin fitting used to retain a wing to a fuselage (note lug on wing rib).
Figure 18.19 SLS nylon clamping mechanisms.
Figure 18.20 Cap-screws and embedded retained nuts, here on an undercarriage fixing point.
Figure 18.21 Transport and storage cases.
Chapter 19: Regulatory Approval and Documentation
Figure 19.1 Typical take-off performance.
Figure 19.2 Typical wiring schematic.
Chapter 20: Test Flights and Maintenance
Figure 20.1 Typical flight log.
Figure 20.2 Typical pre-flight checklist.
Figure 20.3 Typical flight procedures checklist.
Chapter 21: Lessons Learned
Figure 21.1 Our first student-designed UAV.
Figure 21.2 Not all test flights end successfully!
Figure 21.3 Aircraft with variable length fuselage. (a) Fuselage split open. (b) Spare fuselage section.
Figure 21.4 Student-designed flying boat with large hull volume forward and insufficient vertical tail volume aft.
Figure 21.5 Aircraft with split all-moving elevator. (a) Without dividing fence. (b) With fence.
Figure 21.6 Autopilot on vibration test.
Figure 21.7 Student UAV with undersized wings. The open payload bay also added to stability issues.
Figure 21.8 2SEAS aircraft after failure of main wheel axle.
Appendix A: Generic Aircraft Design Flowchart
Figure A.1 Generic aircraft design flowchart.
Appendix C: Worked (Manned Aircraft) Detail Design Example
Figure C.1 Vans RV7 Aircraft. Cropped image courtesy Daniel Betts https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ – no copyright is asserted by the inclusion of this image.
Figure C.2 Concept sketches of an aircraft.
Figure C.3 Side elevation hand sketch imported and scaled.
Figure C.4 Plan, side, and front view imported and scaled.
Figure C.5 Tracing the outline of the hand sketch to capture the “essential” geometry.
Figure C.6 Dimensioned parametric geometry sketch.
Figure C.7 View of all three of the dimensioned parametric geometry sketches.
Figure C.8 Center fuselage part, with side elevation parametric geometry sketch in the background.
Figure C.9 Underlying geometry for the center fuselage.
Figure C.10 Completion of center fuselage.
Figure C.11 Rear fuselage synchronized with center fuselage at shared interface.
Figure C.12 Fully realized fuselage geometry.
Figure C.13 Two-panel wing and wing incidence and location line in side elevation.
Figure C.14 All the major airframe surface parts added.
Figure C.15 Checking against original sketch.
Figure C.16 Addition of propeller disk and spinner so that ground clearance can be checked.
Figure C.17 Engine installation checking cowling clearance and cooling (note: lightweight decal engine geometry).
Figure C.18 Checking the instrument panel fit (again use of decal for instruments).
Figure C.19 Checking the ergonomics of crew seating and canopy clearance/view.
Figure C.20 Hand sketches–to parameterized sketches–to solid assembly.
Figure C.21 Whole aircraft parametric variables.
Figure C.22 Wing geometry used to calculate lift centers for static margin calculations.
Figure C.23 Final parametric aircraft design with all major masses added.
Figure C.24 Final detailed geometry.
List of Tables
Chapter 1: Preliminaries
Table 1.1 Design system maturity
Chapter 2: Unmanned Air Vehicles
Table 2.1 Different levels of UAV autonomy classified using the Wright–Patterson air force base scheme
Chapter 5: Propulsion
Table 5.1 Typical liquid-fueled IC engine test recording Table (maximum rpms are of course engine-dependent)
Table 5.2 Typical IC engine BMEP values taken from various sources
Chapter 6: Airframe Avionics and Systems
Table 6.1 Typical primary transmitter/receiver channel assignments
Table 6.2 Typical servo properties
Chapter 8: The Process of Design
Table 8.1 Example responsibility allocation matrix for a maintenance team
Chapter 9: Tool Selection
Table 9.1 Concept design requirements
Chapter 11: Spreadsheet-Based Concept Design and Examples
Table 11.1 Typical fixed parameters in concept design.
Table 11.2 Typical limits on variables in concept design.
Table 11.3 Estimated secondary airframe dimensions.
Table 11.4 Variables that might be used to estimate UAV weights
Table 11.5 Items for which weight estimates may be required and possible dependencies
Table 11.6 Other items for which weight estimates may be required
Table 11.7 Design brief for Decode-1
Table 11.8 Resulting concept design from spreadsheet analysis for Decode-1
Table 11.9 Design geometry from spreadsheet analysis for Decode-1 (in units of mm and to be read in conjunction with Table 11.3 and 11.8)
Table 11.10 Design brief for Decode-2
Table 11.11 Estimated secondary airframe dimensions for Decode-2
Table 11.12 Resulting concept design from spreadsheet analysis for Decode-2
Table 11.13 Design geometry from spreadsheet analysis for Decode-2 (in units of mm and to be read in conjunction with Table 11.11 and 11.12)
Table 11.14 Design brief for SPOTTER
Table 11.15 Estimated secondary airframe dimensions for SPOTTER
Table 11.16 Resulting concept design from spreadsheet analysis for SPOTTER
Table 11.17 Design geometry from spreadsheet analysis for SPOTTER (in units of mm and to be read in conjunction with Table 15 and 16)
Chapter 13: Preliminary Aerodynamic and Stability Analysis
Table 13.1 A summary of some of the Fluent turbulence models based on information provided in Ansys training materials
Table 13.2 Decode-1 eigenvalues as calculated from XFLR5 stability derivatives using the formulae provided by Phillips [24 25] and the estimated inertia properties for a flight speed of 30 m/s and MTOW of 15 kg
Chapter 14: Preliminary Structural Analysis
Table 14.1 Shear forces (), bending moments (), slopes (, in radians), and deflections () for Euler–Bernoulli analysis of uniform encastre cantilever beams
Table 14.2 A selection of results from various Abaqus models of the Decode-1 airframe
Table 14.3 Natural frequency results (Hz) using Abaqus modal analysis for the Decode-1 airframe
Chapter 15: Weight and Center of Gravity Control
Table 15.1 Typical weight and LCoG control Table (LCoG is mm forward of the main spar)
Chapter 18: Manufacture
Table 18.1 Typical properties of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) tubes
Table 18.2 Typical properties of SLS nylon 12.
Table 18.3 Typical properties of closed-cell polyurethane floor insulation foam.
Table 18.4 Typical properties of glass-fiber-reinforced plastics.
Chapter 19: Regulatory Approval and Documentation
Table 19.1 Typical small UAS operations manual template part Ai
Table 19.4 Typical small UAS operations manual template parts Bii, C, and D
Table 19.5 Typical summary airframe description
Table 19.6 Typical engine characteristics
Table 19.7 Typical aircraft performance summary in still air
Table 19.8 Radio control channel assignments
Table 19.2 Typical small UAS operations manual template part Aii
Table 19.3 Typical small UAS operations manual template part Bi
Table 19.9 Risk probability definitions (figures refer to flight hours)
Table 19.10 Accident severity definitions
Table 19.11 Risk classification matrix
Table 19.12 Risk class definitions
Table 19.13 Typical failure effects list (partial)
Table 19.14 Typical hazard list (partial)
Table 19.15 Typical accident list (partial)
Table 19.16 Typical mitigation list (partial)
Table 19.17 Typical accident sequences and mitigation list (partial)
Related titles
Aerospace Series
Small Unmanned Fixed-wing Aircraft Design: A Practical Approach
Keane
October 2017
Performance of the Jet Transport Airplane: Analysis Methods, Flight Operations, and Regulations
Young
August 2017
Differential Game Theory with Applications to Missiles and Autonomous Systems Guidance
Faruqi
May 2017
Advanced UAV Aerodynamics, Flight Stability and Control: Novel Concepts, Theory and Applications
Marques and Da Ronch
April 2017
Introduction to Nonlinear Aeroelasticity
Dimitriadis
April 2017
Introduction to Aerospace Engineering with a Flight Test Perspective
Corda
March 2017
Aircraft Control Allocation
Durham, Bordignon and Beck
January 2017
Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems: A Human Systems Integration Perspective
Cooke, Rowe, Bennett. Jr. and Joralmon
October 2016
Adaptive Aeroservoelastic Control
Tewari
March 2016
Theory and Practice of Aircraft Performance
Kundu, Price and Riordan
November 2015
The Global Airline Industry, Second Edition
Belobaba, Odoni and Barnhart
July 2015
Modeling the Effect of Damage in Composite Structures: Simplified Approaches
Kassapoglou
March 2015
Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads, 2nd Edition
Wright and Cooper
December 2014
Aircraft Aerodynamic Design: Geometry and Optimization
Sóbester and Forrester
October 2014
Theoretical and Computational Aerodynamics
Sengupta
September 2014
Aerospace Propulsion
Lee
October 2013
Aircraft Flight Dynamics and Control
Durham
August 2013
Civil Avionics Systems, 2nd Edition
Moir, Seabridge and Jukes
August 2013
Modelling and Managing Airport Performance
Zografos, Andreatta and Odoni
July 2013
Advanced Aircraft Design: Conceptual Design, Analysis and Optimization of Subsonic Civil Airplanes
Torenbeek
June 2013
Design and Analysis of Composite Structures: With Applications to Aerospace Structures, 2nd Edition
Kassapoglou
April 2013
Aircraft Systems Integration of Air-Launched Weapons
Rigby
April 2013
Design and Development of Aircraft Systems, 2nd Edition
Moir and Seabridge
November 2012
Understanding Aerodynamics: Arguing from the Real Physics
McLean
November 2012
Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach
Sadraey
October 2012
Introduction to UAV Systems 4e
Fahlstrom and Gleason
August 2012
Theory of Lift: Introductory Computational Aerodynamics with MATLAB and Octave
McBain
August 2012
Sense and Avoid in UAS: Research and Applications
Angelov
April 2012
Morphing Aerospace Vehicles and Structures
Valasek
April 2012
Gas Turbine Propulsion Systems
MacIsaac and Langton
July 2011
Basic Helicopter Aerodynamics, 3rd Edition
Seddon and Newman
July 2011
Advanced Control of Aircraft, Spacecraft and Rockets
Tewari
July 2011
Cooperative Path Planning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Tsourdos et al
November 2010
Principles of Flight for Pilots
Swatton
October 2010
Air Travel and Health: A Systems Perspective
Seabridge et al
September 2010
Design and Analysis of Composite Structures: With applications to aerospace Structures
Kassapoglou
September 2010
Unmanned Aircraft Systems: UAVS Design, Development and Deployment
Austin
April 2010
Introduction to Antenna Placement & Installations
Macnamara
April 2010
Principles of Flight Simulation
Allerton
October 2009
Aircraft Fuel Systems
Langton et al
May 2009
The Global Airline Industry
Belobaba
April 2009
Computational Modelling and Simulation of Aircraft and the Environment: Volume 1 - Platform Kinematics and Synthetic Environment
Diston
April 2009
Handbook of Space Technology
Ley, Wittmann Hallmann
April 2009
Aircraft Performance Theory and Practice for Pilots
Swatton
August 2008
Aircraft Systems, 3
rd
Edition
Moir & Seabridge
March 2008
Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity And Loads
Wright & Cooper
December 2007
Stability and Control of Aircraft Systems
Langton
September 2006
Military Avionics Systems
Moir & Seabridge
February 2006
Design and Development of Aircraft Systems
Moir & Seabridge
June 2004
Aircraft Loading and Structural Layout
Howe
May 2004
Aircraft Display Systems
Jukes
December 2003
Civil Avionics Systems
Moir & Seabridge
December 2002
Small Unmanned Fixed-wing Aircraft Design
A Practical Approach
Andrew J. Keane
University of Southampton UK
András Sóbester
University of Southampton UK
James P. Scanlan
University of Southampton UK
This edition first published 2017
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Andrew J. Keane, András Sóbester and James P. Scanlan to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Offices
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Office
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty
While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Keane, Andrew J., author. | Sóbester, András, author. | Scanlan, James P., author.
Title: Small unmanned fixed-wing aircraft design : a practical approach /
Andrew J. Keane, University of Southampton, UK, András Sóbester,
University of Southampton, UK, James P. Scanlan, University of
Southampton, UK.
Description: First edition. | Hoboken, NJ, USA : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
[2017] | Series: Aerospace series | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
Identifiers: LCCN 2017024962 (print) | LCCN 2017027876 (ebook) | ISBN 9781119406327 (pdf) | ISBN 9781119406310 (epub) | ISBN 9781119406297 (cloth)
Subjects: LCSH: Drone aircraft-Design and construction. | Airplanes-Design and construction.
Classification: LCC TL685.35 (ebook) | LCC TL685.35 .K43 2017 (print) | DDC 629.133/39-dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017024962
Cover image: Courtesy of the authors
Cover design by Wiley
This book is dedicated to the students of the University of Southampton who have designed, built and flown many UAVs over the last decade and who have been great fun to work with.
List of Figures
Figure 1.1
The University of Southampton UAV team with eight of our aircraft, March 2015.
Figure 1.2
The design spiral.
Figure 2.1
The Southampton University SPOTTER aircraft at the 2016 Farnborough International Airshow.
Figure 2.2
University of Southampton SPOTTER UAV with under-slung payload pod.
Figure 2.3
Integral fuel tank with trailing edge flap and main spars.
Figure 2.4
A typical carbon spar and foam wing with SLS nylon ribs at key locations (note the separate aileron and flap with associated servo linkages).
Figure 2.5
A typical SLS structural component.
Figure 2.6
A typical integral fuel tank.
Figure 2.7
Typical telemetry data recorded by an autopilot.
Figure 2.8
Flight tracks of the SPOTTER aircraft while carrying out automated takeoff and landing tests. A total of 23 fully automated flights totaling 55 km of flying is shown.
Figure 2.9
A typical UAV wiring diagram.
Figure 2.10
The SkyCircuits SC2 autopilot (removed from its case).
Figure 2.11
University of Southampton SPOTTER UAV with under-slung maritime flight releasable AUV.
Figure 3.1
Variation of airfoil section drag at zero lift with section Reynolds number and thickness-to-chord ratio.
Figure 3.2
A UAV with significant FDM ABS winglets (this aircraft also has Custer ducted fans).
Figure 3.3
Wing foam core prior to covering or rib insertion – note strengthened section in way of main wing spar.
Figure 3.4
Covered wing with spar and rib – in this case, the rib just acts to transfer the wing twisting moment while the spar is bonded directly to the foam without additional strengthening.
Figure 3.5
A SPOTTER UAV wing spar under static sandbag test.
Figure 3.6
SLS nylon wing rib with spar hole – note the extended load transfer elements that are bonded to the main foam parts of the wing and also flap hinge point.
Figure 3.7
Two wing foam cores with end rib and spar inserted – note in this case the rib does not extend to the rear of the section, as a separate wing morphing mechanism will be fitted to the rear of the wing.
Figure 3.8
SPOTTER UAV wing under construction showing the two-part aileron plus flap, all hinged off a common rear wing spar – note also the nylon torque peg on the rib nearest the camera.
Figure 3.9
UAV that uses wing warping for roll control.
Figure 3.10
UAV that uses tiperons for roll control.
Figure 3.11
Fowler flap – note the complex mechanism required to deploy the flap.
Figure 3.12
Simple FDM-printed wing tip incorporated into the outermost wing rib.
Figure 3.13
UAV with pneumatically retractable undercarriage – the main wheels retract into the wings while the nose wheel tucks up under the fuselage (wing cut-out shown prior to undercarriage installation).
Figure 3.14
Integral fuel tank in central wing section for SPOTTER UAV.
Figure 4.1
SPOTTER SLS nylon engine nacelle/fuselage and interior structure.
Figure 4.2
Bayonet system for access to internal avionics (a) and fuselage-mounted switch and voltage indicators (b).
Figure 4.3
Load spreader plate on Mylar-clad foam core aileron.
Figure 4.4
Commercially produced model aircraft with foam fuselage (and wings).
Figure 4.5
Space frame structure made of CFRP tubes with SLS nylon joints and foam cladding.
Figure 4.6
DECODE aircraft with modular fuselage elements.
Figure 4.7
Wing attachment on SPOTTER fuselage. Note the recess for square torque peg with locking pin between main and rear spar holes.
Figure 4.8
Typical engine and motor mounts for SLS nylon fuselages and nacelles. Note the steel engine bearer in first view, engine hours meter in second image, and vibration isolation in third setup.
Figure 4.9
Frustratingly small fuselage access hatch.
Figure 4.10
Typical plywood avionics boards with equipment mounted. Note dual layer system with antivibration mounts in last image.
Figure 4.11
SULSA forward-looking video camera.
Figure 4.12
SPOTTER payload pods with fixed aperture for video camera (a) and downward and sideways cameras (b and c).
Figure 4.13
Simple two axis gimbal system and Hero2 video camera mounted in front of nose wheel.
Figure 4.14
Three-axis gimbal system and Sony video camera mounted in front of the nose wheel. Note the video receiver system on the bench that links to the camera via a dedicated radio channel.
Figure 4.15
SPOTTER integral fuel tank. Note internal baffle and very small breather port (top left) in the close-up view of the filler neck.
Figure 4.16
Aircraft with SLS nylon fuselage formed in three parts: front camera section attached by bayonet to rear two sections joined by tension rods. Note the steel tension rod inside the hull just behind bayonet in the right-hand image.
Figure 4.17
Example hatches in SLS nylon fuselages. Note the locking pins and location tabs on the right-hand hatch.
Figure 4.18
