164,99 €
In rare cases of stroke in children and youths, a likely cause is the idiopathic disease moyamoya, characterized by the slow and progressive stenosis and occlusion of the internal carotid artery and the arteries of the circle of Willis. A result of these stenoses is the formation of collaterals that are typically small and fragile, and liable to rupture.
While there is no cure for moyamoya, a variety of surgical procedures can be performed to reestablish and maintain adequate blood supply to the affected brain areas. The procedures described here include various revascularization techniques and recommended bypasses.
Key Features:
Surgical Techniques in Moyamoya Vasculopathy is an indispensable guide for the experienced neurovascular surgeon.
This book includes complimentary access to a digital copy on https://medone.thieme.com.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Seitenzahl: 414
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Surgical Techniques in Moyamoya Vasculopathy
Tricks of the Trade
Peter Vajkoczy, MDProfessorChairman, Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatric NeurosurgeryCharité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany
471 illustrations
ThiemeStuttgart • New York • Delhi • Rio de Janeiro
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the publisher
Illustrator: Lucius Fekonja, Berlin, Germany
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KGRüdigerstrasse 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany+49 [0]711 8931 421, [email protected]
Thieme Publishers New York333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA+1 800 782 3488, [email protected]
Thieme Publishers DelhiA-12, Second Floor, Sector-2, Noida-201301Uttar Pradesh, India+91 120 45 566 00, [email protected]
Thieme Publishers Rio de Janeiro,Thieme Publicações Ltda.Edifício Rodolpho de Paoli, 25· andarAv. Nilo Peçanha, 50 – Sala 2508Rio de Janeiro 20020-906 Brasil+55 21 3172 2297
Cover design: Thieme Publishing GroupCover illustration: Lucius Fekonja, Berlin, GermanyTypesetting by Thomson Digital, India
Printed in Germany by CPI Books 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN 978-3-13-145061-6
Also available as an e-book:eISBN 978-3-13-147081-2
Important note: Medicine is an ever-changing science undergoing continual development. Research and clinical experience are continually expanding our knowledge, in particular our knowledge of proper treatment and drug therapy. Insofar as this book mentions any dosage or application, readers may rest assured that the authors, editors, and publishers have made every effort to ensure that such references are in accordance with the state of knowledge at the time of production of the book.
Nevertheless, this does not involve, imply, or express any guarantee or responsibility on the part of the publishers in respect to any dosage instructions and forms of applications stated in the book. Every user is requested to examine carefully the manufacturers’ leaflets accompanying each drug and to check, if necessary in consultation with a physician or specialist, whether the dosage schedules mentioned therein or the contraindications stated by the manufacturers differ from the statements made in the present book. Such examination is particularly important with drugs that are either rarely used or have been newly released on the market. Every dosage schedule or every form of application used is entirely at the user’s own risk and responsibility. The authors and publishers request every user to report to the publishers any discrepancies or inaccuracies noticed. If errors in this work are found after publication, errata will be posted at www.thieme.com on the product description page.
Some of the product names, patents, and registered designs referred to in this book are in fact registered trademarks or proprietary names even though specific reference to this fact is not always made in the text. Therefore, the appearance of a name without designation as proprietary is not to be construed as a representation by the publisher that it is in the public domain.
This book, including all parts thereof, is legally protected by copyright. Any use, exploitation, or commercialization outside the narrow limits set by copyright legislation without the publisher’s consent is illegal and liable to prosecution. This applies in particular to photostat reproduction, copying, mimeographing or duplication of any kind, translating, preparation of microfilms, and electronic data processing and storage.
Foreword
Preface
Contributors
Part 1General Concepts
1 Perioperative Management and Considerations
Bettina Föhre and Susanne König
1.1 Physiology
1.1.1 Basic Physiology of Cerebral Blood Flow
1.1.2 What Is Different in Patients with Moyamoya Disease?
1.2 Anesthesia
1.2.1 Choice of Anesthesia Technique
1.2.2 Preoperative Evaluation and Premedication
1.2.3 Monitoring
1.2.4 Targets of Anesthesia
1.2.5 Induction and Maintenance
1.2.6 Emergence
1.3 Postoperative Care for Moyamoya Disease Patients
1.3.1 Where?
1.3.2 Pain Control
1.4 Threats of Anesthesia for Moyamoya Disease Surgery
1.4.1 Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attacks
1.4.2 Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome
References
Suggested Readings
2 General Principles of Direct Bypass Surgery
Marcus Czabanka and Peter Vajkoczy
2.1 History and Initial Description
2.2 Analysis of Hemodynamic Compromise for Direct Bypass Surgery
2.3 Key Principles of Direct Revascularization Surgery
2.3.1 Graft Choice
2.3.2 Recipient Artery
2.3.3 Standardized Strategies versus Targeted Bypass Procedures
2.3.4 Peri- and Intraoperative Management and Neuroprotection
2.3.5 Intraoperative Flow Assessment
2.4 General Complications and Risk Stratification
References
3 General Principles of Indirect Bypass Surgery
Satoshi Kuroda
3.1 Introduction
3.2 History and Initial Description
3.3 Pathophysiology
3.4 Concept of Indirect Bypass Surgery
References
Part 2Indirect Revascularization
4 Multiple Burr Holes
Thomas Blauwblomme, Philippe Meyer, and Christian Sainte-Rose
4.1 History and Initial Description
4.2 Indications
4.3 Key Principles
4.4 SWOT Analysis
4.4.1 Strengths
4.4.2 Weakness
4.4.3 Opportunities
4.4.4 Threats
4.5 Contraindications
4.6 Special Considerations
4.6.1 Imaging
4.6.2 Patient
4.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
4.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
4.8.1 Anesthesia
4.8.2 Position
4.9 Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
4.10 Difficulties Encountered
4.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
4.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
5 Encephalo-myo-synangiosis
Nils Hecht and Peter Vajkoczy
5.1 History and Initial Description
5.2 Indications
5.3 Key Principles
5.4 SWOT Analysis
5.4.1 Strengths
5.4.2 Weaknesses
5.4.3 Opportunities
5.4.4 Threats
5.5 Contraindications
5.6 Special Considerations
5.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
5.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
5.9 Key Surgical Steps
5.9.1 Patient Position and Skin Incision
5.9.2 Pterional Skin Incision
5.9.3 Separate Skin and Muscle Flaps
5.9.4 Mobilization of the Temporalis Muscle
5.9.5 Elevation of the Muscle Flap
5.9.6 Craniotomy and Drilling of the Sphenoid Wing
5.9.7 Opening of the Dura and Encephaloduro-synangiosis
5.9.8 Suturing of the Muscle Fascia to the Edge of the Dural Opening
5.9.9 Bone Flap Reimplantation
5.10 Difficulties Encountered
5.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
5.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
6 Encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis: Pediatric
Edward Smith
6.1 History and Initial Description
6.2 Indications
6.3 Key Principles
6.4 SWOT Analysis
6.4.1 Strengths
6.4.2 Weaknesses
6.4.3 Opportunities
6.4.4 Threats
6.5 Contraindications
6.5.1 General Contraindications to Revascularization Surgery
6.5.2 Specific Contraindications to EDAS
6.6 Special Considerations
6.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
6.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
6.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
6.10 Difficulties Encountered
6.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
6.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
Suggested Readings
7 Encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis: In Adults
Hao Jiang, Michael Schiraldi, and Nestor R. Gonzalez
7.1 History and Initial Description
7.1.1 Literature Support for the Use of EDAS in Adults
7.2 Indications
7.3 Key Principles for the EDAS Surgery in Adults
7.4 SWOT Analysis
7.4.1 Strengths
7.4.2 Weaknesses
7.4.3 Opportunities
7.4.4 Threats
7.5 Specific Adult EDAS Contraindications
7.5.1 Absolute
7.5.2 Relative
7.5.3 Not Contraindications
7.6 Special Considerations
7.6.1 Care Beyond the Surgical Field
7.7 Risk Assessment and Complications
7.8 Preoperative Workup
7.8.1 Specific Consideration with Anticoagulation
7.9 Patient Preparation
7.9.1 Patient Position with Skin Incision
7.10 Surgical Steps
7.10.1 STA Dissection
7.10.2 STA Care and Preservation
7.10.3 Craniotomy
7.10.4 Middle Meningeal Artery Preservation
7.10.5 Cerebrospinal Fluid Release
7.10.6 Dural Flaps Preparation and Superficial Temporal Artery Fixation
7.10.7 Craniotomy Closure
7.11 Difficulties Encountered and Pearls of Management
7.12 Pitfalls
7.13 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
7.14 Postoperative Care
7.14.1 Patient Surveillance
7.14.2 EDAS Functional Assessment
7.14.3 EDAS Angiographic Assessment
7.14.4 Advanced Imaging
References
8 Bifrontal Encephalo-duro-periosteal-synangiosis Combined with STA–MCA Bypass
Giuseppe Esposito, Annick Kronenburg, Jorn Fierstra, Kees P.J. Braun, Catharina J.M. Klijn, Albert van der Zwan, and Luca Regli
8.1 History and Initial Description
8.2 Indications
8.3 Key Principles
8.4 SWOT Analysis
8.5 Contraindications
8.6 Special Considerations
8.7 Complications
8.8 Special Instructions and Anesthesia
8.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
8.9.1 Direct (STA–MCA) and Indirect (EDMS) Bypass for Unilateral MCA Territory Revascularization
8.9.2 Bifrontal EDPS
8.10 Difficulties Encountered
8.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Manoeuvres
8.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
Part 3Direct Revascularization
9 STA–MCA Bypass for Direct Revascularization in Moyamoya Disease
Alessandro Narducci and Peter Vajkoczy
9.1 History and Initial Description
9.2 Indications
9.3 Key Principles
9.4 SWOT Analysis
9.4.1 Strengths
9.4.2 Weaknesses
9.4.3 Opportunities
9.4.4 Threats
9.5 Contraindications
9.6 Special Considerations
9.6.1 Preoperative Imaging
9.6.2 Anticoagulation
9.6.3 Other Considerations
9.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
9.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
9.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
9.9.1 Preparation
9.9.2 Surgical Technique
9.10 Difficulties Encountered
9.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
9.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
9.12.1 Preoperative Evaluations
9.12.2 Technical Tips
9.12.3 Postoperative Care
References
10 Double-Barrel Bypass in Moyamoya Disease
John E. Wanebo and Robert F. Spetzler
10.1 History and Initial Description
10.2 Indications
10.3 Key Principles of the Double-Barrel Bypass
10.4 SWOT Analysis
10.4.1 Strengths
10.4.2 Weaknesses
10.4.3 Opportunity
10.4.4 Threats
10.5 Contraindications
10.6 Special Considerations
10.7 Risk Assessment and Complications
10.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
10.8.1 Preoperative Workup
10.8.2 Patient Position
10.8.3 Anesthesia
10.9 Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
10.9.1 Skin Incision and Dissection of STA
10.9.2 Temporal Muscle Dissection and Craniotomy
10.9.3 Dural Opening
10.9.4 Anastomotic Site Selection
10.9.5 Donor STA Preparation
10.9.6 Recipient MCA Branch Preparation
10.9.7 MCA Arteriotomy
10.9.8 Anastomosis
10.9.9 Graded Release of the Temporary Clips and Hemostasis
10.9.10 Second Anastomoses
10.9.11 Closure Phase
10.9.12 Postoperative Care
10.10 Difficulties Encountered
10.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
10.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
11 Occipital Artery–Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass in Moyamoya Disease
Ken Kazumata
11.1 History and Initial Description
11.2 Indications
11.3 Key Principles
11.4 SWOT Analysis
11.4.1 Strengths
11.4.2 Weaknesses
11.4.3 Opportunities
11.4.4 Threats
11.5 Contraindications
11.6 Special Considerations
11.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
11.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
11.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
11.10 Difficulties Encountered
11.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
11.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
12 STA–ACA/MCA Double Bypasses with Long Grafts
Akitsugu Kawashima
12.1 History and Initial Description
12.2 Indications
12.3 Key Principle of STA–ACA/MCA Double Bypasses with Long Grafts
12.4 SWOT Analysis
12.4.1 Strength
12.4.2 Weaknesses
12.4.3 Opportunity
12.4.4 Threats
12.5 Contraindications
12.6 Special Considerations
12.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
12.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
12.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
12.10 Difficulties Encountered
12.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
12.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
12.12.1 Graft Management
12.12.2 Anastomosis
12.12.3 Training
Suggested Readings
13 Double Anastomosis Using Only One Branch of the Superficial Temporal Artery: Single-Vessel Double Anastomosis
Ziad A. Hage, Gregory D. Arnone, and Fady T. Charbel
13.1 History and Initial Description
13.2 Indications
13.3 Key Principles
13.4 SWOT Analysis
13.4.1 Strengths
13.4.2 Weaknesses
13.4.3 Opportunities
13.4.4 Threats
13.5 Contraindications
13.6 Special Considerations
13.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
13.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
13.9 Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
13.10 Difficulties Encountered
13.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
13.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
Suggested Readings
Part 4Combined Revascularization
14 Combined STA–MCA Bypass and Encephalo-myo-synangiosis
Marcus Czabanka and Peter Vajkoczy
14.1 History and Initial Description
14.2 Indications
14.3 Key Principles
14.4 SWOT Analysis
14.4.1 Strengths
14.4.2 Weaknesses
14.4.3 Opportunities
14.4.4 Threats
14.5 Contraindications
14.6 Special Considerations
14.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
14.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
14.9 Patient Position and Key Surgical Steps 97
14.10 Difficulties Encountered
14.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
14.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons learned
References
15 STA–MCA Bypass and EMS/EDMS
Ken Kazumata and Kiyohiro Houkin
15.1 History and Initial Description
15.2 Indications
15.3 Key Principles
15.4 SWOT Analysis
15.4.1 Strengths
15.4.2 Weaknesses
15.4.3 Opportunities
15.4.4 Threats
15.5 Contraindications
15.6 Special Considerations
15.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
15.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
15.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
15.10 Difficulties Encountered
15.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
15.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
16 Combined Direct (STA–MCA) and Indirect (EDAS) EC–IC Bypass
Erez Nossek, Annick Kronenburg, and David J. Langer
16.1 History and Initial Description
16.2 Indications
16.3 Key Principles
16.4 SWOT Analysis
16.5 Contraindications
16.6 Special Considerations
16.6.1 Preoperative Considerations
16.6.2 Postoperative Considerations
16.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
16.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
16.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
16.9.1 Description of the Technique
16.10 Difficulties Encountered
16.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
16.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
17 STA–MCA Anastomosis and EDMAPS
Satoshi Kuroda
17.1 History and Initial Description
17.1.1 STA–MCA Anastomosis and EDMAPS as an “Ultimate” Bypass
17.2 Indications and Contraindications
17.2.1 Asymptomatic Moyamoya Disease
17.2.2 Ischemic-Tpe Moyamoya Disease
17.2.3 Hemorrhagic-Type Moyamoya Disease
17.3 Key Principles
17.4 SWOT Analysis
17.5 Special Considerations
17.6 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
17.7 Special Instructions and Anesthesia
17.8 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
17.8.1 Skin Incision and Donor Tissue Preparation
17.8.2 Craniotomy and Dural Opening
17.8.3 Direct STA–MCA Anastomosis
17.8.4 Indirect Bypass and Cranioplasty
17.9 Difficulties Encountered
17.9.1 Preservation of Scalp Blood Flow
17.9.2 Preservation of the MMA during Craniotomy
17.9.3 ICG Videoangiography before Craniotomy 124
17.9.4 STA–MCA Anastomosis
17.10 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
References
18 STA–MCA Bypass and Encephaloduro-arterio-synangiosis
Sepideh Amin-Hanjani
18.1 History and Initial Description
18.2 Indications
18.3 Key Principles
18.4 SWOT Analysis
18.4.1 Strengths
18.4.2 Weaknesses
18.4.3 Opportunity
18.4.4 Threat
18.5 Contraindications
18.6 Special Considerations
18.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
18.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
18.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
18.9.1 Position
18.9.2 Skin Incision and STA Harvest
18.9.3 Craniotomy
18.9.4 Recipient Vessel Preparation
18.9.5 Donor Vessel Preparation
18.9.6 STA–MCA Bypass
18.9.7 Encephalo-arterio-synangiosis
18.9.8 Encephaloduro-synangiosis
18.9.9 Closure
18.10 Difficulties Encountered
18.10.1 Donor Vessel
18.10.2 Craniotomy/Durotomy
18.10.3 Recipient Vessel
18.10.4 Anastomosis
18.10.5 Closure
18.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
18.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
18.12.1 Preoperative Management
18.12.2 Intraoperative Anesthetic Management
18.12.3 Intraoperative Technique
References
19 Individualized Extracranial-Intracranial Revascularization in the Treatment of Late-Stage Moyamoya Disease
Bin Xu
19.1 History and Initial Description
19.2 Indications
19.3 Key Principles
19.4 SWOT Analysis
19.4.1 Strength
19.4.2 Weaknesses
19.4.3 Opportunities
19.4.4 Threats
19.5 Contraindications
19.6 Special Considerations
19.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
19.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
19.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
19.9.1 Skin Incision
19.9.2 Temporal Muscle
19.9.3 Bone Flap
19.9.4 Dura Mater
19.9.5 Target Revascularization
19.9.6 The Simplest Anastomosis Techniques
19.10 Difficulties Encountered
19.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
19.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
Suggested Readings
Part 5Rescue Strategies for Repeat Surgery
20 Omental–Cranial Transposition
Mario Teo, Jeremiah N. Johnson, and Gary K. Steinberg
20.1 Background
20.1.1 History
20.2 Indications
20.3 Key Principles
20.4 SWOT Analysis
20.4.1 Strength
20.4.2 Weakness
20.4.3 Opportunity
20.4.4 Threat
20.5 Contraindications
20.6 Special Considerations
20.7 Risk Assessment: Our Experience
20.8 Preoperative Workup
20.8.1 Specific Consideration with Anticoagulation
20.9 Patient Preparation
20.9.1 Patient Position with Skin Incision
20.10 Surgical Steps
20.10.1 Key Procedural Step 1: Omental Harvest
20.10.2 Key Procedural Step 2: Delivery and Tunneling
20.10.3 Key Procedural Step 3: Craniotomy
20.11 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
20.12 Pitfalls
20.13 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
20.14 Postoperative Care
20.14.1 Patient Surveillance
20.14.2 Bypass Function Assessment
20.15 Case Illustrations
20.15.1 Case 1
20.15.2 Case 2
20.16 Conclusion
Suggested Readings
21 ECA–MCA Bypass with Radial Artery Graft
Satoshi Hori and Peter Vajkoczy
21.1 History and Initial Description
21.2 Indications
21.3 Key Principles
21.4 SWOT Analysis
21.4.1 Strength
21.4.2 Weaknesses
21.4.3 Opportunity
21.4.4 Threat
21.5 Contraindications
21.6 Special Considerations
21.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
21.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
21.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
21.10 Difficulties Encountered
21.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
21.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
22 OA–MCA or OA–PCA Bypass
Mario Teo, Jeremiah N. Johnson, and Gary K. Steinberg
22.1 Background
22.1.1 History
22.2 Indication
22.3 Key Principles
22.4 SWOT Analysis
22.4.1 Strength
22.4.2 Weakness
22.4.3 Opportunity
22.4.4 Threat
22.5 Contraindications
22.5.1 Relative Contraindications
22.6 Special Considerations
22.7 Risk Assessment—Stanford Experience
22.8 Preoperative Workup
22.8.1 Specific Consideration with Anticoagulation
22.9 Patient Preparation
22.9.1 Patient Position with Skin Incision
22.10 Surgical Steps
22.10.1 Key Procedural Step 1: OA Harvest
22.10.2 Key Procedural Step 2: Craniotomy and Dural Opening
22.10.3 Key Procedural Step 3: Prepare Recipient Vessel
22.10.4 Key Procedural Step 4: Prepare Donor Vessel
22.10.5 Key Procedural Step 5: Microanastomosis
22.10.6 Key Procedural Step 6: Ensure Bypass Graft Patency
22.10.7 Key Procedural Step 7: Closure
22.11 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
22.12 Pitfalls
22.13 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
22.14 Postoperative Care
22.14.1 Patient Surveillance
22.14.2 Bypass Function Assessment
22.15 Case Illustrations
22.15.1 Case 1: OA–PCA Bypass
22.15.2 Case 2: OA–MCA Bypass
22.16 Conclusion
Suggested Readings
23 PAA–MCA Bypass
Menno R. Germans and Luca Regli
23.1 History and Initial Description
23.2 Indications
23.3 Key Principles
23.4 SWOT Analysis
23.4.1 Strengths
23.4.2 Weakness
23.4.3 Opportunity
23.4.4 Threat
23.5 Contraindications
23.6 Special Considerations
23.7 Pitfalls, Risk Assessment, and Complications
23.8 Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia
23.9 Patient Position with Skin Incision and Key Surgical Steps
23.10 Difficulties Encountered
23.11 Bailout, Rescue, and Salvage Maneuvers
23.12 Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned
References
Index
I have to admit that during the course of my professional career, I have not encountered anything as fascinating as moyamoya disease (MMD). I can still remember those days when MMD was considered a rare disease, mostly seen in patients from Japan, where it was originally described more than 50 years ago. It was fascinating to see the unusual cerebral angiograms of these patients, showing steno- occlusive changes to the brain-supplying arteries in combination with numerous newly formed small collateral channels at the base of the brain. These changes were difficult to comprehend, particularly when compared with vascular changes noticed in common cerebral ischemia. When it came to treating these patients, we had the option of choosing from a variety of procedures, again mostly introduced by our colleagues from Japan. These procedures were later on summarized under the broad category of “indirect cerebral revascularization.” Moreover, it was found more difficult from a technical point of view to perform an extraintracranial arterial bypass using the superficial temporal artery as the donor vessel. This was, however, not because the epicerebral recipient vessels were smaller in diameter in comparison to the situation in chronic cerebral ischemia. It was discovered later on that the cortical arteries in patients with MMD have a different morphologic design, with a thinner structure of the arterial wall, which in turn requires increased attention and a greater amount of skills when performing a direct end-to-side anastomosis.
Initially, we came across these patients only rarely, maybe two or three cases per year. But this has changed drastically over the years. At the end of my career, the number of patients with MMD had increased to about 30 to 40 per year, and it was no longer a local phenomenon. Meanwhile, sizable clinical series of patients with MMD have been published from centers all over the world.
So, what do we know now about MMD that we did not know 25 years ago? The lessons from clinical experience and related research data have further substantiated that MMD is a particular form of ischemic cerebral disease that can be differentiated from more common entities of cerebrovascular occlusive disease beyond characteristic angiographic findings. Based on functional studies, we now know that MMD is representative of hemodynamic cerebrovascular insufficiency. A further distinctive feature of MMD is the unique capability of the brain to create new collateral inflow channels to compensate for the impaired blood flow due to the underlying stenoocclusive process within the basal arteries. This is clearly illustrated in patients with advanced MMD, where angiographic findings demonstrate arterial collaterals from meningeal and even extracranial arteries, which is never observed in common cerebrovascular diseases. Considering this observation, surgical revascularization is the logical treatment of choice in patients with MMD.
In fact, it can be viewed as an enhancement of an underlying and ongoing natural process. Even in the absence of randomized clinical trials, it is now generally accepted that surgical revascularization is the only effective treatment for patients with MMD. This is further supported by clinical information derived from large postoperative follow-up studies.
It should be mentioned that this is good news for the field of vascular neurosurgery in general. It was not long ago that in the larger context of vascular neurosurgery, MMD was only mentioned under the heading “miscellaneous.” The situation is significantly different now; with extraintracranial bypass surgery for cerebral ischemia becoming obsolete, patients with cerebral aneurysms are increasingly being treated by interventional means, and patients with cerebral AV malformations are being referred to stereotactic radiosurgery. In view of these developments, it is difficult to provide a young colleague with an interest in vascular neurosurgery with good advice on what to do in the future, and I am happy that I do not have to answer this question for myself. However, I'm convinced that the management of patients with MMD will become more important in the future, especially in view of the fact that this disease is still underdiagnosed. It is also good to know that each patient with MMD is usually a candidate for two surgical procedures. There is obviously great potential for further research activities in relation to MMD.
This would not only include research on epidemiology and genetics of MMD but also on its pathophysiology, based on contemporary techniques of molecular biology and other techniques that have become available more recently. We require further information on questions such as what is the optimal surgical technique, if there is one, and if we should use different surgical approaches for pediatric and adult patients with MMD.
We also need more long-term follow-up studies involving our operated patients, and I am quite sure that there will be more surprises.
Finally, coming back to my personal fascination with MMD that I mentioned in the beginning, let me give you another example for purposes of illustration.
I found it most intriguing to study postoperative angiograms in patients who underwent a combined revascularization procedure 1 or 2 years earlier.
It was amazing to see the number and size of the muscular arterial branches that had ingrown and found connection with the cortical arterial network!
Sometimes, it is difficult to differentiate these newly formed muscular branches from the original extraintracranial arterial bypass. This is another unique feature of MMD, and one wonders if the identification of this mechanism or the isolation of the factor that enables this ingrowth of vessels intothe brain could be used for the treatment of other ischemic brain conditions as well.
I am grateful that my long-term coworker Peter Vajkoczy has obviously inherited this interest in MMD, and I will follow his future work with great interest.
Moyamoya vasculopathy (MMV) is a rare cerebrovascular disease that is characterized by bilateral progressive steno-occlusion of basal cerebral arteries, with the emergence of coexisting abnormal net-like vessels. In moyamoya disease, MMV is the single manifestation, whereas in moyamoya syndrome or quasi-moyamoya, MMV is associated with a potentially underlying disease such as a genetic disorder or other coexisting pathology. Although MMV is most frequent in Asian countries, it is ranked among the most frequent causes of stroke in children and adults across the world. The incidence of MMV is on the rise due to increasing awareness of the disease.
The relevance of surgical treatment of moyamoya disease by way of bypass revascularization is undisputed, which is in contrast to the surgical treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion. The main aims of revascularization are to restore the blood supply to stabilize cerebrovascular hemodynamics and to regress the fragile moyamoya vessels in order to prevent bleeding. A successful improvement or normalization of cerebral hemodynamics will then result in secondary stroke prevention and improved neurological or neurocognitive outcome. Consequently, bypass surgery for MMV has become an integral part of the clinical practice of many microvascular neurosurgeons around the world. While the role of bypass surgery is well accepted, a versatile range of surgical techniques and strategies exists in the field, which makes it difficult to determine and appreciate the subtle nuances of the varied surgical strategies.
Therefore, it seemed logical to create an instructive manual for neurosurgeons with a step-by-step guide to the surgical techniques. The focus of this book is on introducing neurosurgeons (and other physicians involved in the treatment of these patients) to the different surgical techniques, to the inherent strengths and weaknesses of each technique, and to the surgical considerations that need to be kept in mind. We are grateful to the contributing authors, who are all authorities in their respective fields, for sharing their unique knowledge and expertise with the readers. The descriptions provided by each of them are characterized by an expert assessment of the distinct surgical techniques and their variations, as well as by a standardized illustration of the surgical steps. This book will thus serve as the key manual for everyone interested in the treatment of these complexities and for those who find it a rewarding experience to treat these patients.
Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Gregory D. Arnone, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Penn State College of Medicine
Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
Thomas Blauwblomme, MD
Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery
Hospital Necker
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)
Université René Descartes, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité
Paris, France
Kees P.J. Braun, MD
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
UMC Utrecht Brain Center
Utrecht, The Netherlands
Fady T. Charbel, MD, FAANS, FACS
Professor and Head, Department of Neurosurgery
Richard L. and Gertrude W. Fruin Professor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Marcus Czabanka, MD
Professor and Vice Chairman
Department of Neurosurgery
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Giuseppe Esposito, MD, PhD
Neurosurgeon, Senior Physician
Department of Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurocenter
University Hospital Zurich
University of Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
Jorn Fierstra, MD, PhD
Department of Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurocenter
University Hospital Zurich
University of Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
Bettina Föhre, MD
Consultant of Anesthesiology
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK)
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Menno R. Germans, MD
Neurosurgeon
Department of Neurosurgery
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
Nestor R. Gonzalez, MD, MSCR, FAANS, FAHA
Professor of Neurosurgery
Director, Neurovascular Laboratory
Neuroendovascular Fellowship Program Director
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Advanced Health Sciences Pavilion (AHSP)
Los Angeles, California, USA
Ziad A. Hage, MD, FAANS
Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center
Adjunct Associate Professor
Campbell University
School of Osteopathic Medicine
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Nils Hecht, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Satoshi Hori, MD, PhD
Department of Neurosurgery
Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmacological Science
University of Toyama
Toyama, Japan
Kiyohiro Houkin, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Faculty of Medicine
Hokkaido University
Sapporo, Japan
Hao Jiang, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
The First Affiliated Hospital
Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, China
Jeremiah N. Johnson, MD, FAANS
Assistant Professor
Department of Neurosurgery
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas USA
Akitsugu Kawashima, MD, PhD
Chief, Department of Neurosurgery
Tokyo Women’s Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center
Chiba, Japan
Ken Kazumata, MD, PhD
Department of Neurosurgery
Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine
Sapporo, Japan
Catharina J.M. Klijn, MD
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
UMC Utrecht Brain Center
Utrecht, The Netherlands
Department of Neurology
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior
Center for Neuroscience
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Susanne König, MD, DESA
Consultant of Anesthesiology
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK)
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Annick Kronenburg, MD
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
UMC Utrecht Brain Center
Utrecht, The Netherlands
Satoshi Kuroda, MD, PhD
Professor and Chairman
Department of Neurosurgery
Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Science
University of Toyama
Toyama, Japan
David J. Langer, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Hofstra North Shore–Long Island Jewish School of Medicine
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, USA
Philippe Meyer, MD
Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology
Hospital Necker
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)
Paris, France
Alessandro Narducci, MD
Division of Neurosurgery
San Giovanni Bosco Hospital
Turin, Italy
Erez Nossek, MD
Division of Neurosurgery
Maimonides Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, USA
Luca Regli, MD
Professor and Chairman
Department of Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurocenter
University Hospital Zurich
University of Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
Christian Sainte-Rose, MD
Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery
Hospital Necker
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)
Université René Descartes, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité
Paris, France
Michael Schiraldi, MD, PhD
Neurosurgeon
Institute of Clinical Orthopedics & Neurosciences
Desert Regional Medical Center
Palm Springs, California, USA
Edward Smith, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Boston Children’s Hospital
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Robert F. Spetzler, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Barrow Neurological Institute
St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Gary K. Steinberg, MD, PhD
Bernard and Ronni Lacroute-William Randolph Hearst Professor of Neurosurgery and the Neurosciences
Chair, Department of Neurosurgery
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, USA
Mario Teo, MBChB(Hons), FRCS(SN)
Consultant Neurosurgeon
Department of Neurosurgery
Bristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience
North Bristol University Hospital
Bristol, UK
Peter Vajkoczy, MD
Professor
Chairman, Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
John E. Wanebo, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Barrow Neurological Institute
St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Bin Xu, MD, PhD
Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital
Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University
Shanghai, China
Albert van der Zwan, MD
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
UMC Utrecht Brain Center
Utrecht, The Netherlands
1 Perioperative Management and Considerations
2 General Principles of Direct Bypass Surgery
3 General Principles of Indirect Bypass Surgery
Bettina Föhre and Susanne König
Abstract
Typically in patients with moyamoya disease (MMD), the cerebrovascular reactivity and the cerebral hemodynamic reserve capacity are impaired, causing transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke. Therefore the superior aim of anesthetic management for revascularization procedures is to ensure the adequate perfusion and oxygenation of the brain to avoid ischemic episodes.
Special attention is paid to maintain the systolic blood pressure between 120 and 140 mm Hg perioperatively, to avoid hypo- and hypertension and to ensure normoxemia, normocapnia, and normovolemia with crystalloids.
The two concepts of a propofol-based anesthesia and an inhalational anesthesia, either in combination with a short-acting analgesic agent, are both established for surgery in moyamoya patients. The authors favor the total intravenous anesthesia, because of the lower rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the better preservation of the regional cortical blood flow in the frontal lobe.
Postoperatively early extubation for an immediate neurological assessment is usually attempted. It demands adequate analgesia and often the use of alpha- or beta-blocking agents to ensure a smooth, stressless, and hemodynamically controlled awakening.
Keywords: impaired hemodynamic reserve capacity, ischemic episodes, normotension, normocapnia, total intravenous anesthesia, early neurological assessment
The normal cerebral blood flow (CBF) of 50 mL/100g/min-1 is dependent on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), i.e., the difference between mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure (MAP − ICP).
Three main principles regulate CBF: (1) flow-metabolism coupling, (2) autoregulation, and (3) carbon dioxide (CO2) reactivity. In regions of increased metabolic activity the local CBF is increased by vasodilation of arterioles to deliver more oxygen and glucose, whereas vasoconstriction is encountered in phases of diminished activity.
In healthy adults, cerebral autoregulation keeps CBF constant within blood pressure ranges between 50 and 150 mm Hg, thus preventing cerebral ischemia. Cerebral vessels react to arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) by responding to hypercapnia with vasodilation and vice versa.
As described in the Monro-Kellie doctrine, the intracranial volume is the sum of brain tissue, intracranial blood volume, and cerebrospinal fluid and is limited by the non-expandable skull.
The ICP-volume curve is nonlinear and shows the relationship between intracranial volume and ICP. When the initial intracranial volume is low and compensatory mechanisms are not exhausted, an increase in intracranial volume produces a small change in ICP. On the steep part of the curve a similar increase of intracranial volume results in a large increase of ICP, resulting in a decrease of CPP, respectively CBF (▶ Fig. 1.1).
Fig. 1.1 Basic physiology of cerebral blood flow.
Moyamoya is characterized by chronic progressive stenotic to occlusive changes in the terminal parts of the intracranial internal carotid arteries including the proximal parts of anterior and middle cerebral arteries. A compensatory fine vascular network is developed. Classically, moyamoya disease (MMD) is present bilaterally, but may also develop unilaterally. In these compromised areas, the cerebrovascular reactivity and the cerebral hemodynamic reserve capacity are impaired, causing transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or strokes. 1 The risk of impaired autoregulation may be even higher in pediatric patients. 2
Furthermore, the fragile moyamoya vessels are prone to hemorrhage. Typically, CBF shows a paradoxic reactivity to a vasodilatory stimulus in the altered areas. The altered moyamoya vessels are already maximally dilated to provide adequate oxygen supply and perfusion to the brain tissue. These vessels cannot react to a stimulus like hypercapnia the way normal vessels do. Thus, in a hypercapnic state flow will increase in brain areas of preserved normal vasculature and decrease in moyamoya affected vessels, leading to insufficient perfusion. This regional redistribution of blood flow to healthy areas is called “steal phenomenon” 3 and might clinically present as a neurologic deficit.
The superior aim of anesthesia for revascularization procedures is to ensure adequate perfusion and oxygenation of the brain and to avoid ischemic episodes. The ideal anesthetic agent should deliver smooth and hemodynamically stable anesthesia, good operating conditions (“slack brain”), and a smooth and rapid emergence to allow early neurological assessment. Cerebral perfusion pressure should be maintained, autoregulation and CO2 reactivity should be preserved.
There are some studies that have investigated propofol-maintained versus inhalational-maintained anesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy. Both strategies were associated with similar brain relaxation, although mean ICP values were lower and CPP values higher with propofol-maintained anesthesia. The recovery profiles, e.g., eye opening, tracheal extubation, obeying verbal commands, and orientation varied only in the range of minutes without clinical significance. Also the incidence of postoperative pain, seizures, and agitation were similar with both techniques. Nevertheless, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower during propofol-maintained anesthesia. 4
Concerning moyamoya patients, both anesthetic concepts are established and no significant differences in patient outcome were noted. Rather the carefully titrated induction drugs and good control of blood pressure, oxygenation, and stability of CO2 level are determinative. 5
In authors’ opinion, there are some important arguments in favor of total intravenous anesthesia: the lower rate of PONV, 6 the better preservation of the regional cortical blood flow in the frontal lobe in comparison to sevoflurane, 7 the occurrence of steal phenomenon with inhalational anesthesia, 8 and finally, a positive practical experience with this technique for intracranial surgery over the past 20 years in their center.
Patients with MMD often present with many other medical conditions, which may impact anesthetic management. Therefore, a profound preoperative anesthetic assessment is necessary and special attention should be paid to the preexisting neurologic deficits and the neurologic physical status. Motor deficits or epilepsy are signals of chronic ischemia. A history of frequent TIAs, prolonged intermittent neurologic deficits, or stroke should draw attention to an already impaired cerebral blood supply in these patients, and has been identified as a significant risk factor for perioperative complications. 9 Preoperative evaluation must also include the determination of the individual baseline blood pressure, which involves several measurements before the day of surgery. A comparative blood pressure measurement on both arms is recommended to exclude falsely low blood pressure measurement intraoperatively due to, for example, subclavian artery stenosis.
Hypertension is found in some patients as a compensatory mechanism for cerebral vascular insufficiency. Caution is necessary when attempting to treat an elevated blood pressure in these patients.
Special attention has to be paid to the patient’s chronic medication. Anticonvulsive and antihypertensive medication should be continued until the day of surgery.
Regarding the antiplatelet-medication in MMD patients, the practice of continuing the medication varies among centers. The perioperative application of aspirin and the postoperative antiplatelet therapy have become controversial. Some centers are giving antiplatelet-medication while others have abandoned them. In our center we determine the effectiveness of aspirin in each patient through a platelet-function test. Thereby detected aspirin nonresponders receive alternative antiplatelet agents. 10
Premedication should be prescribed carefully. Anxiolysis may be necessary and beneficial in children with MMD, as crying should be strictly avoided, because the resultant hyperventilation may lead to hypocapnia and consecutively to cerebral vasoconstriction, resulting in cerebral ischemia. Vice versa oversedation followed by hypoventilation should also be avoided.
Midazolam is most often used for premedication, but other drugs can also be used. 11
The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) standard monitoring should be extended to invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring and urine output measurement. Anesthesiologists should consider placing the arterial line prior to induction, especially if preexisting medical conditions prompt it, and if the procedure is not considered too stressful for the patient.
Continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring intra- and postoperatively is the key for keeping the blood pressure within a predefined range (see Chapter 1.2.4).
Adequate venous access is essential and can be established by two “well-running” intravenous lines. A central venous catheter is not mandatory but should be considered in patients with very poor venous access or severe coexisting medical conditions.
Cerebral function can be monitored in various ways. Most reliable techniques are the combined transcranial motor-evoked potentials (MEP) and sensory-evoked potentials (SEP) monitoring. Cerebral function monitoring is of crucial importance especially in pediatric patients and in unstable adult patients, because they may experience strokes even after short-term blood pressure drops. Electroencephalography can help identify focal slowing, indicating a compromise CBF. Although near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is only validated for measurement of cerebral oxygen saturation on the forehead, it has been shown that a sustained drop in regional oxygen saturation is closely related to the occurrence of neurological events following surgery, 12 and thus NIRS may provide useful information intraoperatively.
It is very important to have appropriate hemodynamic conditions throughout the perioperative period. Reduction in CBF is poorly tolerated, especially in children because they have a diminished autoregulatory response and a higher cerebral metabolic rate. 5
Hypotension may cause ischemia or threaten the graft patency because of developing thrombosis. Hypertension may lead to bleeding or cause a hyperperfusion syndrome with clinical symptoms such as an ischemic attack (see also ▶ Chapter 1.4.2).
There is not the one optimal blood pressure for all MMD patients. Generally it is recommended to maintain the blood pressure normotensive or to keep it within 10 to 20% of the preoperatively established baseline. 11,13 Some MMD patients induce hypertension and are dependent on higher systolic blood pressure levels. Therefore, the systolic blood pressure target should be determined for the individual MMD patient between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. It is of tremendous importance to maintain the blood pressure stable perioperatively within the defined limits. According to our experience, in case of hypertensive adult MMD patients, we suggest to keep the systolic blood pressure 20% above the individual baseline systolic blood pressure. For normotensive adult patients, we suggest to keep the systolic blood pressure at 140 mm Hg. The individual baseline systolic blood pressure can function as the lower threshold for the systolic blood pressure.
Careful and smooth titration of anesthetic drugs for induction, maintenance of anesthesia as well as anticipating cardiovascular responses to surgical stimuli is very important for blood pressure control. Episodes of hypotension should be treated immediately with vasoactive drugs, e.g., norepinephrine or phenylephedrine.
The postoperative goal for blood pressure maintenance should be consented with the surgeon. The target blood pressure depends on the quality and diameter (which determines also the flow) of the bypass. It is also to be taken into consideration if additional indirect techniques have been performed, for example, encephalo-myo-synangiosis. Hyperperfusion of the brain has to be strictly avoided as well as insufficient flow and hypoperfusion. Thus, no general rule can be given. An appropriate analgesic management has to be established before emergence from anesthesia and during the postoperative period to prevent hypertensive episodes. Vasodilating drugs such as urapidil or labetalol should be kept handy.
Normocapnia should be the target of ventilation, regardless of the ventilator mode chosen. The arterial pCO2 should range between 39 and 43 mm Hg, because the cortical blood flow is maximal in this range. 14,15 A retrospective analysis of 124 children undergoing surgery for MMD showed that those patients who suffered from postoperative ischemic complications had intraoperatively PaCO2 levels significantly above 45 mm Hg. If additional risk factors (preoperative TIA) were present, the incidence of postoperative ischemic complications was even higher. 9 This is consistent with a recent investigation of adult MMD patients. It has been demonstrated that hemodynamically unstable Berlin Moyamoya Grade 3 patients (severe MMD) have the highest risk for perioperative ischemia. 16
The collateral network of vessels in patients with MMD is in a state of maximal vasodilation. When healthy vessels dilate in response to hypercapnia, they steal the blood from the hemodynamically compromised areas (of maximal vasodilation). 5,8 See Chapter 1.1.2.
The major aim of anesthesia induction in MMD patients is to perform a smooth induction, not to allow blood pressure to swing between hypertension and hypotension, as well as to avoid hyperventilation, hypoventilation, and hypoxemia.
In children, it is recommended to carefully guide the separation from the parents before anesthesia to prevent crying and thus an increase of ICP or hyperventilation. Intubation should be performed in a deeply anesthetized patient to avoid any hemodynamic effect.
For intravenous induction the choice of agents includes propofol, thiopental, or etomidate.
Also in children, intravenous induction has some advantage over inhalational induction. For the latter, sevoflurane is the agent of choice. Intravenous opioids are recommended to attenuate the response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. The authors prefer the short-acting remifentanil. Administration may be started at a low dose before the induction agent is applied (e.g., remifentanil 0.1 µg/kg BW/min for 5 minutes) and then continued and increased in dosage (e.g., 0.2–0.3 µg/kg BW/min) throughout the procedure as part of the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Bolus administration of fentanyl (e.g., 3–3.5 µg/kg BW) for induction and repetitive doses throughout surgery is another option.
The ideal choice for muscle relaxation is a nondepolarizing agent, unlikely to cause hemodynamic changes or histamine release. 11,13,17
Body temperature should be monitored throughout the procedure and measures should be taken to maintain normal body temperature. The proposed beneficial effect of mild hypothermia reduces the cerebral metabolic rate and thus protects the brain against hypoxia and ischemia to some degree. However, as to date, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to show the benefit of hypothermia for vascular patients in neurosurgery.
Moreover, hypothermia bears the risk of increased bleeding by compromising coagulation and may further precipitate postoperative shivering, and thus increase cerebral metabolic rate.
Anesthesiologists might be asked to administer an intravenous bolus of indocyanine green (ICG) during bypass surgery. ICG video-angiography visualizes the patency of a bypass graft. Technically the angiography requires a microscope with an integrated ICG camera that applies near-infrared light on the surgical field.
ICG is delivered as a powder (25 mg) that has to be diluted in 5 cc of distilled water. Usually the applied dose ranges between 5 and 25 mg. Following the intravenous ICG injection, a short period of “falsely low” pulse oximetry values has to be anticipated due to the dye. ICG is administered in close communication with the surgeon either through a well running intravenous line or a central line, which is immediately flushed with a bolus of 20 cc sodium chloride.
ICG is generally a safe drug, nevertheless, cases have been reported of patients who showed adverse reaction to the ICG injection, especially hypotension. 18
Perioperative fluid management should aim at maintaining normovolemia.
The holding of packed red blood cells or fresh frozen plasma for the surgical procedure should be agreed upon with the surgeon in each institution, depending on the average need for transfusion for the procedure. Intraoperatively, it is crucial to check hemoglobin and hematocrit values regularly. Severe anemia should be treated. There is no ideal hematocrit or hemoglobin level for all MMD patients, but polycythemia should be avoided as much as pronounced hemodilution, because both can lead to cerebral ischemia, the latter by reducing the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. 5,13
The major target at emergence is a smooth and hemodynamically controlled awakening. Extubation may be performed in the operating room (OR) if feasible, to allow for immediate neurological assessment. At the end of surgery an individual blood pressure range should be agreed upon between surgeon and anesthesiologist individualized for each patient, and any deviations should be treated immediately. Usually, the range for systolic blood pressure in adult patients will be set between 120 and 140 mm Hg. Blood pressure increases may occur during patient awakening and should be carefully treated with a well-controllable antihypertensive agent, e.g., with a beta-blocking agent (e.g., esmolol) or alpha-blocking agent urapidil (the latter is not available in United States and Canada). It is also crucial to prevent coughing or shivering and to administer sufficient pain relief.
Sufficient spontaneous ventilation will aid to maintain normocapnia, which should be regularly controlled via PaCO2 measurement through blood gas analysis. Adequate oxygen supply may be assured through oxygen insufflation via a nasal line. An oxygen mask should be avoided, since the straps put direct pressure on the side of the head where bypass surgery had just been performed.
Patients are transferred under continuous monitoring and care from the OR to an intensive care or postanesthesia care unit, where they are monitored overnight. Discharge to the normal ward should be decided the next morning, after neurologic examination and depending on the patient’s well-being.
Blood pressure, oxygen saturation, hematocrit, volume status, and urine output should be closely monitored in the postoperative period. Maintaining normovolemia and avoiding blood pressure exaggeration is crucial. Neurologic examination has to be performed frequently to identify ischemia at an early state. 13
Good analgesia is an important factor in reducing the risk of postoperative cerebral ischemia or infarction. In children, pain relief can also help avoid crying and associated negative effects of hyperventilation and hypocapnia. Pain management can be performed according to the institution’s standards. Early after surgery, opioids will usually be part of the regimen. There are several options, e.g., piritramid (which is not approved in the United States), morphine, or fentanyl, which can be applied by titrating intravenous doses or by continuous infusion, the latter only if the patient is permanently monitored for signs of ventilatory suppression. Of note, when anesthesia was performed with a short-acting agent such as remifentanil, adequate additional analgesia, e.g., with an opioid such as morphine, has to be applied before emergence.
Additionally a peripherally acting analgesic should be applied before emergence, such as paracetamol or metamizol.
Placement of a skull block may be a useful addition to anesthesia in MMD patients. It has been shown to be helpful in children during encephalo-duro-arterio-myo synagiosis (EDAMS) surgery, providing calm awakening and lower analgesic requirements postoperatively. 19
Prevention of any deterioration of cerebral perfusion is pivotal in the care of MMD patients.
Transitory ischemic attacks can occur as a result of inappropriate cerebral perfusion and cannot be reliably detected while the patient is under anesthesia. Alternatively, a graft thrombosis may be the cause. As pointed out previously, hypotension or suboptimal blood pressure control has to be strictly avoided intra- and postoperatively. Generally, the controlled mild hypertension is of greatest relevance to prevent ischemic events in MMD patients. Clinicians should keep in mind the increased risk for ischemic complications in patients with a history of TIAs (see also Chapter 1.2.2). Patients undergoing indirect revascularization procedures will have a persistent risk for cerebral ischemia until the neovascularization has been completed, which may require months.
Intraoperatively bypass patency should be assessed directly and/or with ICG spectroscopy by the surgeon. Postoperatively, transcranial Doppler evaluation or perfusion CT/MRI are valuable diagnostic tools.
Typically in moyamoya patients the diseased vessels are already maximally vasodilated and show little autoregulatory capacity. The low-flow superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STAMCA) bypass might lead to cerebral hyperperfusion in a previously poorly perfused cerebral vascular bed, often presenting as a transient neurological deterioration or an ischemic attack.
Furthermore, cerebral hyperperfusion may lead to intracranial hemorrhage with potentially fatal outcome, thus underlining the emphasis which has to be put onto a strict blood pressure control.
Key Points
Pathophysiologic considerations
Impaired autoregulation
Reduced cerebral hemodynamic reserve capacity
Steal phenomenon
Preoperative evaluation
Attention to previous transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), preexisting neurologic deficits
Stage of hemodynamic failure (see Chapter 1.2.2)
Concomitant disease
Antiplatelet and anticoagulation management of your center
Anesthetic goals
Adequate cerebral perfusion
Normotension, within 10–20% of baseline blood pressure
Normoxia, elevate fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to 1.0 during temporary occlusion
Normocapnia
Normothermia
Normovolemia
Prefer propofol and a short-acting opioid
Sufficient analgesia intra- and postoperatively
Prevent hypo- and hypertension, hypo- and hypercapnia
Monitoring
Electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure (BP)
Arterial line for invasive BP
Intravenous lines
Central venous catheter if required by concomitant disease
Urine output, body temperature
Near–infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)
Postoperative care
Transfer to intensive care unit
BP control within set limits
Ensure graft perfusion (antiplatelet or anticoagulation)
[1] Kuwabara Y, Ichiya Y, Sasaki M, et al. Response to hypercapnia in moyamoya disease. Cerebrovascular response to hypercapnia in pediatric and adult patients with moyamoya disease. Stroke. 1997; 28(4): 701‐707 PubMed
[2] Lee JK, Williams M, Jennings JM, et al. Cerebrovascular autoregulation in pediatric moyamoya disease. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013; 23(6): 547‐556 PubMed
[3] Han JS, Abou-Hamden A, Mandell DM, et al. Impact of extracranial-intracranial bypass on cerebrovascular reactivity and clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic moyamoya vasculopathy. Stroke. 2011; 42(11): 3047‐3054 PubMed
[4] Chui J, Mariappan R, Mehta J, Manninen P, Venkatraghavan L. Comparison of propofol and volatile agents for maintenance of anesthesia during elective craniotomy procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2014; 61(4): 347‐356 PubMed
[5] Chui J, Manninen P, Sacho RH, Venkatraghavan L. Anesthetic management of patients undergoing intracranial bypass procedures. Anesth Analg. 2015; 120(1): 193‐203 PubMed
[6] Sneyd JR, Andrews CJ, Tsubokawa T. Comparison of propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil for maintenance of anaesthesia for elective intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94(6): 778‐783 PubMed
[7] Kikuta K, Takagi Y, Nozaki K, et al. Effects of intravenous anesthesia with propofol on regional cortical blood flow and intracranial pressure in surgery for moyamoya disease. Surg Neurol. 2007; 68(4): 421‐424 PubMed
[8] Sato K, Shirane R, Kato M, Yoshimoto T. Effect of inhalational anesthesia on cerebral circulation in Moyamoya disease. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1999; 11(1): 25‐30 PubMed
[9] Iwama T, Hashimoto N, Yonekawa Y. The relevance of hemodynamic factors to perioperative ischemic complications in childhood moyamoya disease. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38(6): 1120‐1125, discussion 1125–1126 PubMed
[10] Smith ER, Scott RM. Surgical management of moyamoya syndrome. Skull Base. 2005; 15(1): 15‐26 PubMed
[11] Baykan N, Ozgen S, Ustalar ZS, Dagçinar A, Ozek MM. Moyamoya disease and anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005; 15(12): 1111‐1115 PubMed
[12] Orihashi K, Sueda T, Okada K, Imai K. Near-infrared spectroscopy for monitoring cerebral ischemia during selective cerebral perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004; 26(5): 907‐911 PubMed
[13] Parray T, Martin TW, Siddiqui S. Moyamoya disease: a review of the disease and anesthetic management. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011; 23(2): 100‐109 PubMed
[14] Kurehara K, Ohnishi H, Touho H, Furuya H, Okuda T. Cortical blood flow response to hypercapnia during anaesthesia in Moyamoya disease. Can J Anaesth. 1993; 40(8): 709‐713 PubMed
[15] Yusa T, Yamashiro K. Local cortical cerebral blood flow and response to carbon dioxide during anesthesia in patients with moyamoya disease. J Anesth. 1999; 13(3): 131‐135 PubMed
[16] Czabanka M, Boschi A, Acker G, et al. Grading of moyamoya disease allows stratification for postoperative ischemia in bilateral revascularization surgery. Acta Neurochir. 2016; 158:18951900
[17] Brown SC, Lam AM. Moyamoya disease--a review of clinical experience and anaesthetic management. Can J Anaesth. 1987; 34(1): 71‐75 PubMed
[18] Bjerregaard J, Pandia MP, Jaffe RA. Occurrence of severe hypotension after indocyanine green injection during the intraoperative period. A A Case Rep. 2013; 1(1): 26‐30 PubMed
[19] Ahn HJ, Kim JA, Lee JJ, et al. Effect of preoperative skull block on pediatric moyamoya disease. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008; 2(1): 37‐41 PubMed
