The Celtic Religion
The Celtic ReligionCHAPTER I—INTRODUCTORY: THE CELTSCHAPTER II—THE CHIEF PHASES OF CELTIC CIVILISATIONCHAPTER III—THE CORRELATION OF CELTIC RELIGION WITH THE GROWTH OF CELTIC CIVILISATIONCHAPTER IV—CELTIC RELIGION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUALISED DEITIESCHAPTER V—THE HUMANISED GODS OF CELTIC RELIGIONCHAPTER VI—THE CELTIC PRIESTHOODCHAPTER VII—THE CELTIC OTHER-WORLDCopyright
The Celtic Religion
Edward Anwyl
CHAPTER I—INTRODUCTORY: THE CELTS
In dealing with the subject of ‘Celtic Religion’ the first duty of
the writer is to explain the sense in which the term ‘Celtic’ will
be used in this work. It will be used in reference to those
countries and districts which, in historic times, have been at one
time or other mainly of Celtic speech. It does not follow that all
the races which spoke a form of the Celtic tongue, a tongue of the
Indo-European family, were all of the same stock. Indeed,
ethnological and archæological evidence tends to establish clearly
that, in Gaul and Britain, for example, man had lived for ages
before the introduction of any variety of Aryan or Indo-European
speech, and this was probably the case throughout the whole of
Western and Southern Europe. Further, in the light of comparative
philology, it has now become abundantly clear that the forms of
Indo-European speech which we call Celtic are most closely related
to those of the Italic family, of which family Latin is the best
known representative. From this it follows that we are to look for
the centre of dissemination of Aryan Celtic speech in some district
of Europe that could have been the natural centre of dissemination
also for the Italic languages. From this common centre, through
conquest and the commercial intercourse which followed it, the
tribes which spoke the various forms of Celtic and Italic speech
spread into the districts occupied by them in historic times. The
common centre of radiation for Celtic and Italic speech was
probably in the districts of Noricum and Pannonia, the modern
Carniola, Carinthia, etc., and the neighbouring parts of the Danube
valley. The conquering Aryan-speaking Celts and Italians formed a
military aristocracy, and their success in extending the range of
their languages was largely due to their skill in arms, combined,
in all probability, with a talent for administration. This military
aristocracy was of kindred type to that which carried Aryan speech
into India and Persia, Armenia and Greece, not to speak of the
original speakers of the Teutonic and Slavonic tongues. In view of
the necessity of discovering a centre, whence the Indo-European or
Aryan languages in general could have radiated Eastwards, as well
as Westwards, the tendency to-day is to regard these tongues as
having been spoken originally in some district between the
Carpathians and the Steppes, in the form of kindred dialects of a
common speech. Some branches of the tribes which spoke these
dialects penetrated into Central Europe, doubtless along the
Danube, and, from the Danube valley, extended their conquests
together with their various forms of Aryan speech into Southern and
Western Europe. The proportion of conquerors to conquered was not
uniform in all the countries where they held sway, so that the
amount of Aryan blood in their resultant population varied greatly.
In most cases, the families of the original conquerors, by their
skill in the art of war and a certain instinct of government,
succeeded in making their own tongues the dominant media of
communication in the lands where they ruled, with the result that
most of the languages of Europe to-day are of the Aryan or
Indo-European type. It does not, however, follow necessarily from
this that the early religious ideas or the artistic civilisation of
countries now Aryan in speech, came necessarily from the conquerors
rather than the conquered. In the last century it was long held
that in countries of Aryan speech the essential features of their
civilisation, their religious ideas, their social institutions,
nay, more, their inhabitants themselves, were of Aryan
origin.
A more critical investigation has, however, enabled us to
distinguish clearly between the development of various factors of
human life which in their evolution can follow and often have
followed more or less independent lines. The physical history of
race, for instance, forms a problem by itself and must be studied
by anthropological and ethnological methods. Language, again, has
often spread along lines other than those of race, and its
investigation appertains to the sphere of the philologist. Material
civilisation, too, has not of necessity followed the lines either
of racial or of linguistic development, and the search for its
ancient trade-routes may be safely left to the archæologist.
Similarly the spread of ideas in religion and thought is one which
has advanced on lines of its own, and its investigation must be
conducted by the methods and along the lines of the comparative
study of religions.
In the wide sense, then, in which the word ‘Celtic religion’ will
be used in this work, it will cover the modes of religious thought
prevalent in the countries and districts, which, in course of time,
were mainly characterised by their Celtic speech. To the sum-total
of these religious ideas contributions have been made from many
sources. It would be rash to affirm that the various streams of
Aryan Celtic conquest made no contributions to the conceptions of
life and of the world which the countries of their conquest came to
hold (and the evidence of language points, indeed, to some such
contributions), but their quota appears to be small compared with
that of their predecessors; nor is this surprising, in view of the
immense period during which the lands of their conquest had been
previously occupied. Nothing is clearer than the marvellous
persistence of traditional and immemorial modes of thought, even in
the face of conquest and subjugation, and, whatever ideas on
religion the Aryan conquerors of Celtic lands may have brought with
them, they whose conquests were often only partial could not
eradicate the inveterate beliefs of their predecessors, and the
result in the end was doubtless some compromise, or else the
victory of the earlier faith.
But the Aryan conquerors of Gaul and Italy themselves were not men
who had advanced up the Danube in one generation. Those men of
Aryan speech who poured into the Italian peninsula and into Gaul
were doubtless in blood not unmixed with the older inhabitants of
Central Europe, and had entered into the body of ideas which formed
the religious beliefs of the men of the Danube valley. The common
modifications of the Aryan tongue, by Italians and Celts alike, as
compared with Greek, suggests contact with men of different speech.
Among the names of Celtic gods, too, like those of other countries,
we find roots that are apparently irreducible to any found in
Indo-European speech, and we know not what pre-Aryan tongues may
have contributed them. Scholars, to-day, are far more alive than
they ever were before to the complexity of the contributory
elements that have entered into the tissue of the ancient religions
of mankind, and the more the relics of Celtic religion are
investigated, the more complex do its contributory factors become.
In the long ages before history there were unrecorded conquests and
migrations innumerable, and ideas do not fail to spread because
there is no historian to record them.