The Quest for the Celtic Key E-Book

Karen Ralls-MacLeod

• Herausgeber: Luath Press
• Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013

Beschreibung

The Quest series from Luath Press continues with the quest for all things Celtic, an investigation into aspects of Celtic history that have previously been neglected or lost. The authors argue strongly that the evidence they have uncovered within folklore, legends, the guilds, and the oral traditions of secret societies in Scotland, link together with striking similarities. They further suggest that these links are not coincidence but the last visible threads of belief systems that have been at the center of the Scottish psyche for centuries. The Celtic Key makes sense of the underlying beliefs that have contributed to, motivated, and shaped a nation through the ages. REVIEWS A fascinating journey through the mystery and magic of Scotland's past...the authors describe the people, places and traditions -- Watkins Review, London, Winter 2002, Issue no. 4A refreshing look at Scotland's past...we are presented with such a wealth of information; well worth reading -- Dalriada, journal of Celtic heritage, Scotland, 2003A spellbinding step into the...world of ancient Caledonia and the people who laid the foundations of Scotland -- West Lothian Courier newspaper, 27 June 2002An enthralling and informative journey through time which deserves a place on every Scottish bookshelf...their sources are well documented -- Scots magazine, Vol 158 No.2, 2003Without resorting to colourful conjecture...it nevertheless adds its own voice to the enduring mysteries of Scotland's Celtic heritage -- Historic Scotland magazine, Winter 2002-3 issue

Leseprobe

DR. KAREN RALLS-MacLEOD, FSA Scot., Medieval historian and Celtic scholar, is author ofThe Templars and the Grail: Knights of the Quest(2003) andMusic and the Celtic Otherworld(University of Edinburgh/St. Martin’s Press, 2000). She was Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Edinburgh for 5 years and is now based at Oxford. Karen lectures worldwide and is also founder of Ancient Quest (www.ancientquest.com) an historical research organisation.

IAN ROBERTSON is a local Scottish researcher with a special interest in Edinburgh and Midlothian history, folk traditions and legends. In 1988, upon becoming a Freemason, his research interests moved into the exploration of Scottish Freemasonry. A member of Masonic research groups, he has presented lectures to many Scottish Masonic lodges. Ian lives in the Edinburgh area and works as a trainer and youth worker.

‘The reader who travels with Karen Ralls-MacLeod and Ian Robertson... will find a travelogue which enriches the mythologies and histories so beautifully told, with many newly wrought connections to places, buildings, stones and other remains which may still be viewed in the landscape and historic monuments of modern Scotland...’

REV. DR. MICHAEL NORTHCOTT, Faculty of Divinity, University of Edinburgh

‘Karen Ralls-MacLeod is endowed with that rare jewel of academia: a sharp and inquisitive mind blessed with a refreshing openness. Her stimulating work has the gift of making the academic accessible, and brings a clear and sound basis to the experiential... from ‘Idylls of the King’ to ‘Indiana Jones’, the search for the Holy Grail will never be the same again. This is a ‘must read’ book for all who sense the mystery and magic of our distant past...’

ROBERT BAUVAL, bestselling author ofThe Secret ChamberandKeeper of Genesis

‘This book takes us on a fascinating journey through the mystery and magic of Scotland’s past. Along the way, the authors describe the people, places and traditions associated with Scotland’s legends and history... the Declaration of Arbroath, the Stone of Destiny, the ‘missing library’ of Iona, Arthurian traditions, the Holy Grail, the Picts, the Druids... Celtic saints... Robert the Bruce... Rosslyn Chapel... the Knights Templar, and much more...’

WATKINS REVIEW

‘... a refreshing look at Scotland’s past. I find this style of history reading wonderful. From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Druids, leading on to Stone Circles, Early Celtic Saints and the culdees, we are presented with such a wealth of information without being overwhelmed. Arthur, the Holy Grail and Masonic and Guild traditions, all with such strong connections to Scotland, also find a home in this book. Well worth reading.’

DALRIADA, the journal of Celtic culture, heritage and traditions

‘... bringing together many of the disjointed history, folklore and legends of the past ... explores the development and impact of freemasonry in Scotland ... goes beyond the official documents and records to bring you some of the sidelined aspects of Scottish and Celtic history.’

THE ASHLAR

‘An enthralling and informative journey through time which deserves a place on every Scottish bookshelf. Like a giant jigsaw puzzle all the pieces are here for the reader to fit together or discard as he or she chooses. In case anyone should think this a lightweight rehash of old legends, let me assure you that the authors have brought all their academic skills to their research.’

MARGARET GRAEME, SCOTS MAGAZINE

‘The book is the accumulation of a life’s passion for Scottish history and the myths and legends which surround it. What they have done is produce a well-laid out, concise and fascinating book which, while being far from the idiot’s guide, offers the uninitiated in Scottish history a fresh and clearly laid out path to the past. Commendably, the book is based on information gathered from a wide range of expert sources, both old and new, and this offers as objective a view of events as any new enthusiast could hope for. The book brings together disjointed myths, folklore and legends from the earliest Scottish history through to the 14th century and beyond, and does so uniquely by looking past the official documents and records. Rosslyn Chapel, the search for the Holy Grail and the Stone of Destiny all get an intriguing airing as do the legends of Robert the Bruce, King Arthur and the Knights Templar. Complete with illustrations and photographs, The Quest for the Celtic Key is a spellbinding step into the strange world of ancient Caledonia and the people who laid the foundations of the country known as Scotland today.’

WEST LOTHIAN COURIER

‘Anyone who likes to turn over questions and then take the opportunity to visit the many charismatic places mentioned will be entertained by this book. Without resorting to colourful conjecture and wild surmising, it nevertheless adds its own voice to the enduring, and probably unsolvable, mysteries of Scotland’s Celtic heritage.’

BARBARA FRASER, HISTORIC SCOTLAND magazine

The Quest for the Celtic Key

KAREN RALLS-MacLEOD

and

IAN ROBERTSON

LuathPress Limited

EDINBURGH

www.luath.co.uk

First Published2002

First Paperback Edition Published2003

This edition2005

eBook 2013

ISBN (eBook): 978-1-909912-43-4

Permission to use the Green Man image on the front cover has kindly been granted by Rosslyn Chapel Trust.

© Karen Ralls-MacLeod and Ian Robertson

Acknowledgements

We have been assisted in this effort by various individuals and organisations that we would very much like to thank for their time, knowledge, patience and encouragement: the National Library of Scotland, the City of EdinburghLibrary, Edinburgh UniversityLibrary, British Library, Bodleian library, Glasgow University library, Scottish Public RecordOffice, West Register House, Royal Society of Edinburgh, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Historic Scotland, Royal Celtic Society, National Archives of Scotland, National Museum of Scotland, New College Divinity library, Royal Historical Society, National Trust for Scotland, Midlothian library headquarters, Newbattle Abbey library, East Lothian library headquarters, West Lothian library headquarters, University of Aberdeen library, Dundee University library, University of Highlands & Islands, Dingwall public library, Inverness city library, Dumfries and Galloway regional library, Whithorn Museum, Stornoway Museum, Grand Lodge of Scotland library, Canonbury Masonic Research Centre (London), United Grand Lodge of England library, Warburg Institute, Smithsonian Institute, Prince Henry Sinclair Society, Niven Sinclair, Ian Sinclair, Robert BrydonFSAScot., Lindsay Brydon, Goethe Institute, Peter and Sarah Dawkins, Francis Bacon Research Trust, Tom Leggett, Trades Maiden Hospital archive, Ian Fyfe, Theosophical Society library (London), The Theosophical Society in America, Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis (AMORC) library headquarters, San Jose,CA, Judy Fisken, Stuart Beattie, Rosslyn Chapel Trust, the Friends of Rosslyn, the Earl of Rosslyn, Clan Sinclair, Clan MacLeod, Professor William Gillies, School of Scottish Studies, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Bill Taylor of Ardival Harps, Barnaby Brown, Simon Chadwick, Professor Thomas Charles-Edwards, Dr Nerys Jones, Marianna Lines, Zin Craig, Pictish Arts Society, Susan Seright, Curator of the Groam House Museum (Rosemarkie), Netherbow Director Dr Donald Smith, the Church of Scotland, the Scottish Episcopal church, the Scottish Roman Catholic church, the Scottish Reformation Society, Domhnall MacCormaig, Scottish Poetry library, Saltire Society, Lesley Stuart, Greyfriars Kirk Gaelic service community, Yvonne Sinclair, John and Joy Millar, the Sauniere Society, the Most Rev Bishop Richard Holloway, John Algeo, Alan Bain, Hamish Henderson, Margo Fish, John and Caitlin Matthews, Merlinda Arnold, Olivia Keith-Mitchell, Michael Newham, Anne-Marie Mullen, Dr Margaret Bennett, the late Anne Macaulay (Hon Fellow of Music, University of Edinburgh), Robert Holden, Rev Miranda Holden (New Seminary), Rev Avril Carson, Deirdre O’Flinn, Mark Dosier, Marigold Hutton, Jeremy Naydler, Michael and Seza Eccles, Simon le Fevre, Professor Gerard Leduc, Paul Falardeau, Eleri Golesworthy, Claudine Glot of the Centre de l’Imaginaire Arthurien, Chateau de Comper-en-Broceliande, Brittany, Professor Philippe Walter, University of Grenoble, Elizabeth Lane, the New York Open Center, Caroline McCausland, the late Alan Bruford, and the late Ian Ferguson (Edinburgh).

We would also like to make some special dedications and heartfelt thanks to those special family members, partners, and friends who helped us through the process of writing this book: From Dr Karen Ralls-MacLeod: ‘To my husband Jon, whose special encouragement, patience, sense of fun and unshakable belief in this project were always truly inspirational, and to my other special friends, family and colleagues here and abroad who have been supportive throughout, many thanks. Also, a tribute to the ancient library of Alexandria, for inspiring us all.’ From Ian Robertson: ‘To my mother and father who gave me my curiosity and love of learning, my partner Vivienne who put up with me and encouraged me throughout the writing of this book and to Samantha, Kevin, and the rest of the family for believing in me even when I didn’t myself.’ We would both like to give many thanks, too, to Gavin and Audrey MacDougall of Luath Press Edinburgh.

We also thank you, our readers, as you embark on your own journey. The real Quest never ends, as all of us search for the Truth... now and in the future.

Contents

INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 In the Beginning… the story of Scotland and its origins

CHAPTER 2 The Druids:TheirHistory andLegacy

CHAPTER 3 Stone Circles, Megaliths, and early sacred sites

CHAPTER 4 The Early Celtic Saints of Scotland

CHAPTER 5 The Culdees: Servants and Companions of God

CHAPTER 6 King Arthur, Merlin, and Guinevere: Scottish Traditions

CHAPTER 7 The Holy Grail

CHAPTER 8 Masonic andMedieval Guild Traditions

CHAPTER 9 Rosslyn Chapel: AnArchetypal ‘King Solomon’s Temple’

Bibliography

Map of Territories of the Celtic Saints

Introduction

We’ll tak a cup o’ kindness yet, for auld lang syne.

Robert Burns,Auld Sang Syne(1796)

‘The past remains integral to us all, individually and collectively. We must concede the ancients their place... But their place is not simply ‘back there’, in a separate and foreign country; it is assimilated in ourselves, and re-surrected into an ever-changing present.’

Dr David Lowenthal,The Past is a Foreign Country(1985)

What is remembered, lives... History is alivingmemory of the past. It has always meant different things to different people and this seems to have been especially true of the history of Scotland. Travel to historic places has always been a powerful tradition the world over, to see and explore the ancient sites, medieval monastic remains and buildings that still survive today.

But places have their history and unique traditions, some from a long, long time ago. Many people today want to know much more about the origin-myth of the Scots, Robert the Bruce, Iona, Arthurian traditions, Rosslyn Chapel, the Culdees, the Knights Templar, Celtic saints, the Holy Grail or the Stone of Destiny, for example. So mainly due to the increasing popular demand for more detailed information and the fact that many aspects of these subjects have not been readily available in more conventional histories, we bring you this book.

InThe Quest for the Celtic Keywe share with you the results of our journey which started ten years ago. This began when Dr Karen Ralls-MacLeod, a Celtic scholar and medieval religious historian from the University of Edinburgh, was in the process of writing a Celtic history book and was invited to the home of a member of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. As it happened, a local Scottish Masonic researcher named Ian Robertson was also present and after further discussion and research exchanges, was subsequently asked to join this effort, especially regarding Masonic material for chapter 8. The resulting odyssey has taken us from our widely divergent fields to bring to light various facts and traditions of Scottish history.

To help meet the continuing public demand for more information, we have drawn together material from a wide variety of sources. In addition to examining the standard historical sources from academic books and journals, Historic Scotland, the National Library of Scotland, the Society of Antiquaries, the National Archives of Scotland and the Public Record Office, we have also made an effort to consult records from private archives, law tracts, church records, accounts of saints’ lives, Masonic records, newspaper accounts, family histories, ballads, legendary accounts of specific places; chivalric libraries and archives, Highland storytellers, monastery receipts and business records to enrich and enlarge our analysis of history. We have also included some of the lesser-known, sidelined and previously unavailable or unacknowledged aspects of history that, for one reason or another, may not have made it into more conventional accounts to date.

This book largely covers aspects of Scottish history from very early times up until the year 1320 and the signing of the Declaration of Arbroath. Chapter 8, by necessity, deals with some elements of 18th C Scotland, but for us to largely go any further than the 14th C would be another work in itself. Specific chapters in this book address the history and issues surrounding the origin-myth of the Scots, the Declaration of Arbroath, the Picts, stone circles and megaliths, Druidic philosophy, Celtic saints, the Culdees, the Celtic church, Iona, Scottish Arthurian traditions, the Holy Grail, the Guild traditions of medieval Edinburgh, Masonic history in Scotland, Robert the Bruce, medieval chivalric Orders, Rosslyn Chapel and Prince Henry Sinclair’s 14th C journey from Scotland to the New World.

Places associated with these subjects include Arbroath, Iona, Edinburgh, Melrose, Bannockburn, Temple, St Andrews, Glasgow, Whithorn, Aberdeen, Inverness, Stirling, Callanish, Rosslyn Chapel, villages and churches in the Highlands and Islands, Arthurian localities of Midlothian and the Borders, the Pictish stones of Fife and Angus and many, many more, far too numerous to mention here.

The factual history, customs, beliefs, myths and legends of a specific local or regional area are often intertwined with each other, layer upon layer, in early Scottish history. Of course simply because we, as authors, also include some references to mythic and legendary material in our discussions, does not mean that we necessarily endorse or advocate any particular viewpoint; we merely aim to include information from a wide variety of sources for the reader to make up his or her own mind. Although we do discuss the historical traditions of a number of places and localities, this book is not a travel book per se, as the focus is mainly on history and Celtic historical traditions, customs and beliefs.

New links between the history of the New World and Scotland are being discovered all the time, as with Prince Henry Sinclair’s voyage to Nova Scotia in 1398. It is now acknowledged by an increasing number of experts on both sides of the Atlantic that the Scottish Declaration of Arbroath (1320) most likely had an influence on the American Declaration of Independence, a view put forth by Professor Ted Cowan of Glasgow University and others. A similar connection is presented by Scottish author Duncan Glen in his recent bookPrinting Type Designs: a New History from Gutenburg to 2000– that America’s Declaration of Independence was typeset by printer John Dunlap in type that was made by an Edinburgh man named John Baine, from ‘Calton’. He and his grandson went on to become the leading typefounders in America. These types were later referred to as ‘Scotch’ type in America. They were used on the first ‘pirated’ version of theEncyclopedia Britannicain early America, which was then the largest American printing production that had ever been undertaken. These types were the precursors of the typeface now known as ‘Scotch Roman’.

So no matter where one comes from, history is a Quest of continuing, unfolding discovery. On our quest in this book we have explored a number of fresh new perspectives and fascinating glimpses into various areas of Scottish history and the places associated with it. Like putting together many pieces of a diverse puzzle, what lies before you may seem unusual at times, but will hopefully be an intriguing look at the past.

Ultimately, the quest for a ‘Celtic key’ leads to a more ‘Universal key’, a Truth that can propel us on, encouraging all of us to recall that history in its many different forms is alivingmemory. We hope that you, too, will enjoy the journey, keeping in mind the courage of the universal traveller:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—

I took the one less travelled by,

And that has made all the difference.

Robert Frost,The Road Not Taken(1916)

Dr. Karen Ralls-MacLeod

Ian Robertson

March 2002

Edinburgh

CHAPTER ONE

In the Beginning… the story of Scotland and its origins

IN THE BEGINNING… are the origin-myths, traditions and history of a people. The efforts by a people to define their history, origin and place in the grand scheme of things has been true of nearly every society on earth – many tribes and nations have tried to define themselves in relation to the larger Universe in some way.

Artefacts, written records, monastic manuscripts, trading receipts, laws, family history, religion, heroic poetry, saints’ lives, tales, art and storytelling traditions all play a part in how history comes down to future generations. Of course, Scotland has been no exception to this – take, for example, the many traditions and legends about the Stone of Destiny.

Long before castles, whisky, golf or major scientific inventions, Scotland existed and had a history. But just how an ‘image of Scotland’ started, how it was shaped and evolved though time is fascinating enough. The ‘tartan and shortbread’ image is known to have largely been started by Sir Walter Scott in comparatively recent times. The ‘Ossian controversy’ of the 18th C is still being discussed among researchers today, whether James MacPherson’s famous workOssianwas authentic or not. But given that it was known to be Napoleon’s favourite reading at the time, and also that of many other prominent people on the Continent in the 18th C, perhaps it does not ultimately matter. It certainly put Scotland ‘on the map’ to the rest of the world at the time, much like the filmBraveheartdid in more recent times. Fact or fiction, theeffectremains.

But there have actually been many other portrayals of early Scotland throughout the ages, and many of these come from a variety of sources, some of which might seem rather unusual to us today. Much of the major origin-myth of Scotland started in ancient times as part of oral tradition, and was then later further developed throughout the so-called Dark Ages, culminating in the famous Declaration of Arbroath in 1320.

Recently, the world was watching on 1 July 1999 as the new, devolved Scottish Parliament was opened in Edinburgh. This was a truly historic occasion, as the last Parliament in Scotland was in 1707, nearly three hundred years ago. In 1996, a stone (dubbed by some the ‘Stone of Destiny’) that Edward I took from Scone in 1296 was finally returned to Scotland. In April 2001, Sir Sean Connery, a living legend of our time, was presented with the William Wallace Award in Washington DC for his contribution to furthering American-Scottish relations, as part of the new USA ‘Tartan Day’ celebrations. It is now widely known that for a country of its relatively small size, Scotland has produced an inordinately high number of geniuses including Carnegie and Adam Smith. Scotland, it seems, has been in the news more than ever.

Other major Scottish symbols like the Stone of Destiny, tartan and the saltire, the national flag of Scotland, are also important to history and of which we will learn about later. But we will begin with the origin-myth, history and traditions about the origin of a people and their nation.

‘The Scots’ of history

So who were ‘the Scots’ of history? This is a complex question, as much of the whole process of defining the nation and its people started long, long ago. Dr William Ferguson of the University of Edinburgh points out inThe Identity of the Scottish Nationthat there formed in Dark Age Europe:

… compounds of tribal lore, of the fabulous histories of Greece and Rome, and above all, the new source of religious knowledge, the Holy Bible… the pagan West Saxon dynasty in England derived its descent from Woden, but by the ninth century the descent of Alfred the Great was traced back to Adam… tribes had relied on oral tradition… but after the acceptance of the Christian faith reliance came to be placed more on writings, though oral transmission would long continue Indeed, the written record and oral transmission began to interact.1

So the earlier stories that had been told for centuries were then later written down. This also happened in many other countries – Ireland, England, France, Greece, Israel, Spain, to name but a few. But as Ferguson and others believe, ‘in few countries has this particular issue of the antiquity and virtue of the race lasted longer or caused more controversy than in Scotland.’2

Scotland has always had strong oral traditions and some of these were later incorporated into various origin-myths about who the Scots were and where they came from. As Dr Ferguson says,

The reception and elaboration of the origin-myth of the Scots in early medieval Scotland is, in fact, shrouded in mystery. Was it transmitted by oral tradition alone? That might account for some of its vagaries… Or did the medieval Scots use their current oral versions to help preserve… earlier written sources? That is also a possibility… But, unfortunately, conclusive documentary proof of the exact provenance of the Scottish origin-myth that was advanced in medieval Scotland is not to be had.3

So, the exact source(s) for the major origin-myth of Scotland is still not known for certain today. Historians acknowledge that many early written sources in Scotland were either sacked by the Vikings, stolen, destroyed, or perhaps hidden away, leaving much less for modern researchers to work with than would normally be the case. But what is indisputable is the fact that the Scots in the 12th and 13th centuries were growing more and more concerned about their ethnic origins, their right to the land they inhabited, and were fearful of a growing threat from their powerful English neighbours. So, they did what many peoples in history have done in similar circumstances: they relied on the origins, history, oral and written traditions of the nation, to help solidify a feeling of national identity, a right to independence, ethnic origins, and so on. This resulted one of the most passionate, memorable and rhetorical documents of all time – the Declaration of Arbroath.

The Declaration of Arbroath

In the year 1320AD, a letter to the Pope was written that defined and outlined the character of a people and their nation. It was written in the aftermath of the difficult Wars of Independence against England which came to a head in 1314 with the Scottish victory at the Battle of Bannockburn. It has become synonymous with the terms freedom and civil liberty. It had quite an impact in its day, and is also believed to have had an influence on the American Declaration of Independence some 450 years later.4

This letter, also known as theLetter from the Barons of Scotland to Pope JohnXXII, was designed to influence the papacy in the favour of the Scottish king Robert the Bruce, who had been bravely fighting against the English king Edward I and his aggressive moves towards Scotland for some time. Bruce (Robert I) had been excommunicated by the church primarily due to his having murdered a competitor in the past with some accomplices, something that is admittedly abhorrent, but actually was not as rare in medieval times as we may think today. So, understandably, the church took action against Bruce and then began harassing the powerful nationalistic bishops of Scotland:

As a sacrilegious murderer and excommunicate he and his cause were ill-regarded in Rome, and The Letter of the Barons aimed to explain the situation in Scotland and to exculpate King Robert. The result was a truly remarkable document…5

The Declaration of Arbroath was summarised by one historian as ‘one of the masterpieces of political rhetoric of all time’.6And indeed it was.

Who? And where?

For many years, the author of the Declaration has been assumed to have been Bernard de Linton, Abbot of Arbroath and Chancellor of Scotland, as he was the overall signatory who signed the document dated 6 April 1320. However, recent scholarship has contested this, as Professor Ted Cowan of Glasgow University explains:

Just who did mastermind the letter of 1320 is not known. An earlier generation was confident that it was composed by Bernard de Linton… [but] Professor Duncan has now demonstrated that Bernard de Linton and Abbot Bernard of Arbroath, the chancellor, were different people… The case against Bernard, however, is not absolutely conclusive… The candidate suggested for authorship by Professor Barrow is Mr Alexander Kinninmonth, a canon lawyer with considerable curial experience and future bishop of Aberdeen; he was one of the ambassadors who accompanied the 1320 missive to the papal court at Avignon… Authorship will probably never be conclusively proven…7

Cowan believes that whoever did write the Declaration very likely had access to important earlier documents, such as the Declaration of 1309, the Irish letter of 1317, the works of John of Salisbury, as well as other material in 1320. So, although actual authorship may never be known for certain, it is very likely that a specific group contributed to its overall rhetoric, metaphor and style.

Arbroath Abbey, in the northeast of Scotland, was founded by William I in 1178 and dedicated to St Thomas Becket. It has always been assumed that the 1320 Declaration was written at Arbroath, although it is now believed by experts at Historic Scotland to have been drafted at a council held at Newbattle Abbey, in Midlothian, near Edinburgh, in March of 1320.8

But it is now also being questioned by experts whether or not the Declaration was actually signed at Arbroath on the 6 April 1320, as has always been assumed. Today, the USA and some Canadian provinces have officially adopted the 6 April as Tartan Day, in honour of Scotland and its beliefs in freedom and resistance to tyranny, concepts which largely have come down to us from the Declaration of Arbroath. Exact date or not, the 6 April continues to remain symbolic of Scotland, freedom and the Declaration of Arbroath.

The origin-myth in the Declaration of Arbroath

So what did the Declaration of Arbroath say about who ‘the Scots’ were and where they came from? And why is it so important? Clearly, this is a rhetorical document and passionate in its pleas. A brief summary might be something like this:

The Scottish nation had a very distinguished history, originating in Greater Scythia, in the vicinity of the Black Sea, from where they wandered through the Mediterranean to the Straits of Gibraltar for a lengthy sojourn in Spain. Then, 1,200 years after the Israelites crossed the Red Sea, the Scots were identified as a chosen people, and arrived in Scotland to defeat the Britons and Picts while fighting off constant attacks from the Scandinavians and the English.The Declaration then says that the Scottish nation had held its possessions ‘free of all servitude ever since,’ under the custodianship of 113 kings, ‘the line unbroken by a single foreigner’. Even though the Scots existed ‘at the uttermost ends of the earth’, they were singled out among the first for salvation through the medium of St Andrew, the first-called of all the disciples.9

Then, the Declaration continues, saying that the Scots, a favoured people in the eyes of God, were protected by successive popes as a ‘special charge’ of St Andrew, and were living in freedom and peace until the English arrived in the guise of a friend, when in fact, they were an enemy. God intervened to save his people through King Robert the Bruce, who is compared to another courageous Maccabeus or a Joshua.10

Next – the most famous part – is about King Robert the Bruce and the role of the king in relation to his people, which deserves to be quoted in full:

… [our] king. We are bound to him for the maintaining of our freedom both by his rights and merits… Yet if he should give up what he has begun, seeking to make us or our kingdom subject to the king of England or the English, we would strive at once to drive him out as our enemy and a subverter of his own right and ours, and we would make some other man who was able to defend us our king. For as long as a hundred of us remain alive we will never on any conditions be subjected to the lordship of the English. For we fight not for glory nor riches nor honours, but for freedom alone, which no good man gives up except with his life.11

The Pope is then urged to ‘admonish and exhort’ the English king Edward II ‘to leave in peace us Scots’… who are willing to concede whatever is necessary for peace, even offering to help the Pope fight in future Crusades, if peace be theirs. However,ifthe Pope will not credit their sincerity, future calamities will be laid at his door. They undertake to obey the Pope and they entrust their cause to God, and conclude by wishing the Pope holiness, health and long life. Dated 6 April 1320.12

The Community of the Realm: a new concept

This is an extraordinary claim – where the Scots say that if their king, Robert the Bruce, would not defend them for any reason, that they would replace him. This was a bold statement to make, and especially in those times, as European monarchs were generally perceived as ruling from ‘the top down’ and rarely with the consent of the people. However, here the Scots are declaring, to put it plainly: if King Robert (or his descendants) ever ‘sells out’ to the English, then he will simply be kicked off the Scottish throne and replaced.

The implication behind this is that the sovereign only remains a sovereignby the will of the people, and not merely by ‘divine right’ – a new idea at the time. Unlike the subjects of England, by inference, the Scots were saying that in Scotland, their view was thatallof the people were equal in status to the king. The whole Scottish concept of ‘the Community of the Realm’ was further nurtured by this courageous document, akin to a type of Scottish constitution. Later, in the American Declaration of Independence, we also find the concept of governance by ‘the consent of the governed’. In 1776, Thomas Jefferson wrote:

… that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it…13

In his 1993 book on the Declaration of Arbroath, James Adam says:

It is a document remarkable for its sturdy independence ex-pressed within a loyalty to the Pope. It is noteworthy also for its Celtic attitude to the power of the Throne. Almost alone among the nations of feudal Europe where the accepted concept was that authority flowed downward from the crown, Scotland stated clearly and firmly that here the rights flow upward from the people. In the presence of the King, they made it plain that he had their support as long as he did not betray them and that, should he do so, they would choose another King. The Letter used exceptionally direct language to the Pope and did not hesitate to indicate potential areas of guilt and blame.14

This statement is the first recorded instance in European history of the contractual theory of monarchy, a fact that is taken for granted now but which originates from this unprecedented work. It is a document that takes a strong stand for freedom, especially from oppression and tyranny. In modern times, one can almost sense the spirit of this with the admittedly stereotyped image of Mel Gibson and his men inBraveheartshouting ‘Freedom’!

The very idea that King Robert the Bruce might actually be deposed and another set up in his place was revolutionary in its time, a concept that scholars have tried to determine the precise source of. Many theories abound, from the powerful Celtic concepts of kingship that the Scots obviously already knew about, to the Arthurian ideal of the king that would ‘rise again’ and ‘save his people’, to biblical parallels, and so on.

Professor Ted Cowan mentions that the writings of the churchman Thomas Aquinas may even have been an inspiration to the clerics, nobles and barons who wrote the Declaration, perhaps especially the powerful bishops of the time, such as Bishop Wishart or Lamberton.15Aquinas is seen by many historians as an important link between classical thought and civic humanism, and was widely read at the time. He observed that ‘the state is nothing but the congregation of men’ and ‘lesser evil follows from the corruption of a monarchy than from the corruption of an aristocracy’.16Aquinas addressed the problem of tyranny, and in some of his writings, implied that tyrants may be removed by public authority and that the king’s power must be limited – points that are also evident in the Declaration of Arbroath.

The Scottish Wars of Independence

The Declaration was obviously written in reaction to what had been happening in the period leading up to 1320, which had been a most difficult and challenging time for the Scots. In spite of the Scots’ stunning victory over the English at Bannockburn in 1314, Edward II carried on the hostilities that his father Edward I had started in 1296 in his attempts to conquer Scotland. In 1296, Edward I attempted to show the Scots that they had become annexed to England – as had already happened to the Welsh.

The annexation of Wales resulted from the Statute of Wales in 1284; in 1301 it was finalised by the creation of the title of ‘the Prince of Wales’, which is still in use today by the heir to the throne. Ceremoniously, Edward also carried the most powerful talismanic symbols held by the Welsh on his Scottish campaign in 1296, including the important relic of a piece of the True Cross and the legendary Crown of King Arthur. These were then later taken to Westminster to humiliate the Welsh even further.

Edward I was astute in that he clearly saw the value of such symbols to a nation’s pride and identity. After subduing the Welsh, he then tried to break the will of the Scots, by having the national seal broken and carrying off special symbols of power – the Scottish Coronation Stone of Scone, the Holy Rood of St Margaret, other precious relics, and national records. Understandably, the Scots angrily retaliated with an aggressive series of battles to save their independence. These would last for some time.

The 1320 Declaration by the Scots was an appeal to the Pope against continued aggression from the English. The problem was that the Pope acknowledged the sovereignty of Edward I, but not that of Robert the Bruce, as he had murdered his opponent to the Scottish throne, John ‘the red’ Comyn, in the Greyfriars Kirk of Dumfries on 11 February 1306.

As a result of this, Robert became king. However, as this act had also defiled the church as a sanctuary, he was understandably excommunicated by the Pope. But by doing so, Bruce was obviously aware that this would have probably been a likely result, as historians now note. It is also interesting that the powerful nationalistic bishops, especially Wishart and Lamberton, had what we might call today a rather ‘muted response’ to this. Bruce was clearly acting in deliberate defiance of the papacy in a number of ways early on.

Robert the Bruce as ‘a Maccabean hero’

Robert the Bruce was certainly a courageous leader and in the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scots compare him to the great hero of the Maccabees of Israel. From a rare 1850 book by William Livingston entitledVindication of the Celtic Character, we read that:

… our Prince and King, Robert, who, in delivering his people out of the hands of their enemies, as another Maccabee or Joshua… whom also, by Divine Providence, and the right of succession, according to our laws and customs, which we will maintain to the utmost, and with the due consent of all of us, have we made him our Prince and King…17

Here the Scottish king, Robert I, is compared to the great hero of the Apocryphal first book of Maccabees, Judas Maccabeus. The confident tone of the words that follow are perhaps not too unlike the message of the Declaration of Arbroath. The account is from I Maccabees 3: 2–6:

He had the support of all his brothers and his father’s followers, and they carried on Israel’s campaign with zest. He enhanced his people’s glory. Like a giant he put on his breastplate and girt himself with weapons of war. He waged many a campaign from a camp well guarded with the sword. He was like a lion in his exploits… while the cause of freedom prospered in his hands.

Slightly further on in I Maccabees 3: 19–22, it says:

Victory does not depend on numbers; strength is from Heaven alone. Our enemies, inflated with insolence and lawlessness, are coming against us; they mean to kill us… But we are fighting for our lives and for our laws and customs, and Heaven will crush them before our eyes; you have no need to be afraid of them.

The spirit of the wording in these biblical passages does seem to parallel certain sentiments of the Declaration, especially regarding King Robert the Bruce as a leader of an oppressed people, blessed by God, to fight for their freedom no matter what the cost.

Who were the Maccabees?

But who, then, were the Maccabees? The books of the Maccabees were known to many throughout Europe at the time the Declaration was written, with the Jewish martyrs already having an established cult. TheOxford Dictionary of Saintstells us a bit more about the Maccabees, who fought and died rather than compromise their beliefs:

The cult of these Old Testament martyrs in the Christian Church is both ancient and widespread… They are believed to typify the Christian martyrs who found themselves in similar circumstances and the cult may be held to reveal the close connection between Jewry and early Christianity and to show Christian sympathies for the sufferings of Jewish martyrs in the Roman Empire.18

Interestingly, earlier, in 1301,EdwardIhimself was compared to the tyrant Antiochus, the infamous defiler of the Temple of Jerusalem, by Scottish envoys at the papal court. This notorious action of Antiochus is widely believed to have been the primary cause of the whole Maccabean revolt. The envoys alleged that like the biblical tyrant Antiochus, Edward I afflicted Scotland with many atrocities, and, ‘like Antiochus he defiled despotically with sacrilegious recklessness [its] church abominations of numerous kinds’.19

Robert the Bruce, knighthood and chivalric values

The chivalric ideal of the Crusading knight, brave, loyal and courageous, has also influenced Scotland’s values. For example, when historian Walter Bower repeated the charges against the English king, ‘he explicitly evoked the chivalric ethic, claiming that Edward began to stir up strife ‘as soon as he became a knight’…’20Robert the Bruce, after Bannockburn, was known by the epithet ‘First Knight of Christiandom’.

Regarding the Declaration of Arbroath, ‘the widespread admiration in which Joshua and Judas Maccabeus were held in the Middle Ages was a notable aspect of the cult of chivalry and, from an early stage, chivalric writers had ranked these two – and the latter in particular – foremost amongst the heroes of Christian chivalry’.21Indeed, in the tradition of the devout French Knight Templar Geoffrey de Charney, Judas Maccabeus represented the pinnacle of courage and knightly achievement and was seen as representative of the highest honours of chivalry.22

As King of Scotland, Robert the Bruce also destroyed the previous alliance that he had enjoyed with Edward I in earlier times, and so naturally Edward then became a formidable enemy. The decisive victory over the English army in 1314 at Bannockburn finally assured his reign and brought together the Scottish people as a confident force, and a stronger feeling of nationhood emerged.

The ‘right to anointment’

However, years were to pass before England, or the papacy, actually accepted that outcome. A truce wasn’t established until 1323, nine years later. In 1328, when Robert the Bruce was finally recognised as the king of an independent realm by the Treaty of Northampton, he asked the Pope to grant him and his successors the ‘right to anointment’, i.e. the right to anoint successive kings of Scots. Although Robert was recognised as king of Scotland, he didn’t yet have the right to anoint a successor, which needed to come from the Pope. But the Scots still had to wait quite some time before this was done; finally, Pope John XXII issued his bull of 13 June 1329 which authorised the anointing of the kings of Scots. This was the same year that Robert the Bruce was gravely ill and finally died.

Strangely enough, this bull never mentions anything about Scotland still being a ‘papal fief’, as that previously oft-repeated claim seems to have rather suddenly lapsed. Unfortunately Robert the Bruce died before the actual anointing ceremony could take place. But it was the Declaration of Arbroath in 1320 that eventually achieved, among other things, the full recognition of the Scottish king and his right to anoint successive kings of Scots

As Dr William Ferguson puts it (emphasis ours): ‘The origin-myth wasthe linchpin that held the Scottish case together, and it figured prominently in the long disputes from 1290 to 1329.’23Truly, the power of assorted historical myths and legends to literally ‘make history’ is evident in this case.

Early Scottish origin legends

Of course, received wisdom says of the Declaration of Arbroath that most of it was merely very clever rhetoric, an assortment of various myths and legends. Certainly this would appear to be the case. But upon learning that we were working on this book, and of hearing about the origin-myth in the Declaration of Arbroath, a friend of one of the authors, a trial attorney, asked: But perhaps there might have been ‘a kernel of truth’ in their case somewhere? After all, it doesn’t seem that the Scots would have had any motive to simply lie outright to the papacy – especially when trying to make a good impression and seeking the Pope’s help on behalf of their excommunicate king. They would have wanted to put their ‘best case forward’. So, did the Pope ever actually dispute their claims? If he felt they were lying, he would certainly have every reason to be angry and tell them so, and even take action. The English would certainly have exploited that, too. So, what did he say in response?

Ironically, we had to admit that we didn’t know, but acknowledged that these were interesting, provocative points, perhaps typical coming from a trial lawyer who loves to argue!

But we also had to admit that we had rarely seen this particular issue addressed directly in the established histories, as complicated issues like this are often dealt with as footnotes in fine print, or sidelined in relation to other larger issues. We did acknowledge, however, that it is widely known that the Declaration was deliberately constructed by those in favour of Bruce, so, in a sense, it was, at the very least, a brilliant ‘medieval spin doctor’ document, in modern-day parlance.

We also knew that the Pope did not deny the important connection of the Scots to St Andrew, for example. This was only one point about one of the claims by the Scots in the Declaration. St Andrew was said by the Church to have gone to Asia Minor and also to parts of the Scythian area to spread the gospel – precisely where the Scots claimed they came from. Clearly, much more research needs to be done regarding the specific arguments used in both directions about these claims, for clarification.

Admittedly, in our modern times, it does seem quite unusual – or even outright bizarre – for the Scots to have stated that they originally came from Greater Scythia by the Black Sea, and that they had travelled a very great distance for centuries, finally arriving in what is now Scotland. A strange tale indeed. But, to be fair, every nation has its myths. The Americans have the cherished legend of George Washington and the cherry tree, for instance, and so the Scots have stories of their Scythian origins, the Stone of Destiny, and so on.

However, whilst ‘myth-bashing’ has been common in modern times, much of this type of material has not been studied in any great detail at all. However, an increasing number of serious scholars are now acknowledging thatthe belief systems of a people– which, like it or not, do include their historical tales, legends and myths – have been found to have influenced the core political, economic and legal aspects and values of society in a much larger way than has been previously believed. They are worthy of serious study in their own right, as history has shown that their effect has been great and enduring. After all, Heinrich Schliemanndidshock the world when he actually found the ancient city of Troy, based on clues in Homer’sIliad, years ago.

Historical facts and legends are often so intertwined in early history that it is often difficult to distinguish between the two. But does this then mean thatallmyths and legends are automatically false, or that all history is true? No, it does not, as it all depends on who wrote it, and what their viewpoints and intentions were. Usually, as we know today, the victor ends up writing the history. So, their worldview and values predominate, whether accurate or not.

The important thing here is to try to get into the mind of the medieval Scots in order to really understand wheretheywere coming from. In medieval times, people believed differently than we do now, and we must remember this, difficult as it may seem to us today.

‘Greater Scythian’ origins

As historians have noted, in telling the Pope in the Declaration of their conversion by St Andrew, and of their arrival in Scotland 1,200 years or so after ‘the outpouring of the peoples of Israel’, the Scots – incredibly – seem to be implying to him that they were actually connected to Israel in some way. This legendary origin-myth of a ‘chosen people by God’ is one that other peoples in history have also claimed, for various reasons. Of course, this is a seemingly fanciful area to explore, but it cannot be denied that the many existing legends about, for example, the Stone of Destiny, Scottish kingship, and for some reasonseem to relate to biblical or Old Testament themes and legends. The question is: why? And why is this emphasis so persistent?

The 9th C Welsh writer Nennius mentions early migrations to the north, where the Scots come from Egypt via Spain before landing in Ireland:

According to the most learned among the Scots… Ireland was a desert and uninhabited when the children of Israel crossed the Red Sea, in which … the Egyptians who followed them were drowned. At that period, there lived among this people, with a numerous family, a Scythian of noble birth who had been banished from his country, and did not go to pursue the people of God. The Egyptians who were left, seeing the destruction of the great men of their nation, and fearing lest he should possess himself of their territory, took counsel together and expelled him.24

The expulsion of this Scythian noble man and his family, who is later said to have led his descendants into Spain, and then further north to become the Scots, is the crux of the matter here. However, the overall idea of the Scots being ‘a wandering people’ or nation remains consistent. That certain tribes of Israel constitute this ‘wandering nation’ are also part and parcel of other traditions:

These Jews were, in fact, not the people that Moses led out of Egypt but the remnant of Judah taken to Egypt by Jeremiah, following the fall of Jerusalem in 586BC.25

So why is ‘Scythia’ mentioned so often?

Again and again we seem to be faced with the term ‘Scythia’ and reference to the ‘Greater Scythia’ area. These terms have been much debated through the years. The term Scythian has been linked with more than one early people from the British Isles in their early histories. The Scots, Picts, Irish, Britons and Anglo-Saxons all have ancient accounts of ancestors supposedly coming from Scythia, near the Black Sea, and also from an area called ‘Greater Scythia’, as stated in the Declaration of Arbroath, which incorporates a larger area in the same vicinity.

The Welsh, who rightly identify themselves with the ancient P-Celtic speaking Britons, still refer to themselves as the Cymry. The term Cymry equates with the Cimmerians in early accounts, who are related to the Welsh and the lowland Scots, and they, too, have claimed descent at various times from the Scythian area:

Homer tells: ‘And it (Ulysses’ ship) reached the extreme boundaries of the deep-flowing ocean; where are the people and city of the Cimmerians covered with shadow and vapour, nor does the shining sun behold them with his beams, neither when he goes towards the starry heaven, nor when he turns back again from heaven to earth; but pernicious night is spread over the hapless mortals.’ Historically the Cimmerii lived to the east of the Black Sea, in what was called Sarmatia… according to Herodotus, the Sarmatians themselves were a horse-riding people descendants of the Amazons by Scythian fathers… the (Scythian) men failed to learn the language of the women and the women learned that of the men imperfectly, and thus ‘Sarmatian’ was a corrupt Scythian.26

Interestingly, as we will see in chapter 6, one of the more controversial academic theories currently being debated is about the possible origins of many of the Arthurian themes supposedly coming from a Scythian tribe called the Sarmatians, near the Black Sea.

Many writers have concluded that rather than just being simply a reference to ethnic origins, ‘Scythian’ is also a term that has been used to designate a migratory or a wandering people in general. Sandford, Lancaster Herald of Arms in the time of James II, states that when Edward I brought the coronation stone from Scotland, there was a piece of wood attached to it, on which were cut in Latin the following lines:

Ni fallst fatum Scoti hune quocunque locatum, Inyeniunt lapidem regnare tenentur ibidem.

If fates go right, where’er this stone is found, The Scots shall monarchs of that realm be found.

Sir Walter Scott, in a translation of Irish lines into English regarding the same stone, writes:

Unless the fates be faithless grown, or prophet’s voice be vain, Where’er is found this sacred stone, the wanderers race shall reign.27

Here Scott is referring to a ‘wanderers race’. The following translation, made by the Scottish historian Hector Boece in 1537, is interesting in that Boece gives a translation of the Gaelic original which we are told read:

If the prophecy is not false, Wherever the hoary pillow is found, By right out of the free nation of Scots Kings will be taken.28

Boece here refers to the stone as ‘the hoary pillow’, thought by many to be a reference to Jacob’s Pillow and the implications that has regarding the Stone of Destiny.

The Picts were, according to some accounts, ‘descended from a colony of ‘Scythian’ or ‘Thracian’ seafarers who took wives from among the Irish before settling in the Orkney Islands and northern Scotland’.29Early writers like Herodotus, Bede and Nennius all mention this. We will learn more about the enigmatic Picts in chapter 3.

The term ‘Scot’ can mean many different things to many different people, an issue which we will explore at various points throughout this book. In ancient times, northern Britain was also called ‘Alba’, a named still referred to by some as Scotland today.30

Dr Vittorio Bertoldi, a highly regarded language scholar, has shown that the prefix ‘alb’ is actuallypre-Indo-European, and that it is found in the largest concentrations around the Caucasian mountains near the Black Sea area. He believes that the prefix ‘alb’ probably entered Latin as a loan word with a connotation of ‘white’, acquired by an association with snow-capped mountains in the area. So, consider the theory of some: Did these very earlypre-Indo-European ‘wanderers’ somehow end up in early Scotland?31

Ancient human habitation in the Black Sea area

Ironically, in September 2000 a highly unusual discovery was made by professional archaeologists twelve miles off the coast of Sinop, Turkey, in the Black Sea, which could possibly significantly change history regarding early migrations into Europe.

Dr Robert Ballard, Director of the Institute for Exploration and the expert marine geologist who discovered the wreck of the Titanic, has now discovered signs of ancient human habitation 300 feetbelowthe current surface of the Black Sea. Emmy-award winning science and medical journalist Linda Moulton Howe explains:

Never before in world archaeology has any human habitation been found so deep under water. He has been using submersion vessels to look for old river beds beneath the Black Sea where people might have lived before a great flood inundated the region about 7,000 years ago… using that river bed strategy, he found the remains of a stone house with fireplace and grooved wooden beams…32

Many cultures have stories and legends about a great flood, and of course, the Black Sea is no exception. Dr Ballard himself states ‘What you have in the Black Sea flood, is a permanent flood that would have driven people away forever who would have to have settled a new land…’33Dr Ballard and his colleagues believe that these people had no choice but to flee, and that they possibly went into Mesopotamia, as well as further west and north. This Black Sea flood was 7,000 years ago, having occurred in about 5000BC.

But, of course, we are not implying that this necessarily means anything in relation to the ancient Scots, or Celts, per se, but, nonetheless, it would seem that this new discovery cannot be totally discounted either. The important issue here is that the very idea of early peoples migrating into Europe, saying that they had been a ‘travelling people’ from very far away, seems to have been a rather common phenomenon in early times, and may have been for very good reasons. Even now, there are many refugees in Europe who come from many faraway locales, sometimes due to a natural disaster, for example.

Many ancient peoples in their traditions and legends say they migrated from somewhere far away, and it appears that the early ‘Scots’ – or, more accurately, those who werecalled‘the Scots’ – seem to be no exception to this. But it seems rather ironic that a leading international archaeological expert is now saying that certain early peoples were obviously forced to flee from the Black Sea area, i.e. Greater Scythia, by a great flood that is known by scientists today to have occurred around 5000BC.

Linguistic and genetic research: ‘Greater Scythia’

Linguists – and now geneticists – have known for some time that the Indo-Europeans, of whom the Celts are a part, are thought to have originated in Turkey, then migrated from the Caucasian mountains area near the Black Sea in the southern steppes of Russia, into Europe. This theory has been put forth by Dr Colin Renfrew of Cambridge University and others. The early Kurgan culture is known to have been located in the southern Russian steppes, and to have been a major area from which Indo-European languages spread, as argued by archaeologist Dr Marjia Gimbutas and shown by modern-day genetic research. New excavations have shown that horses and war chariots were a key part of this culture, and, of course, we know that they are frequently mentioned in many early Celtic tales and legends.

One prominent geneticist and cultural historian, Professor Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, states that:

...it may be useful to refer to the original Indo-European spoken in Turkey 10,000 years ago as the primary Indo-European, pre-proto-Indo-European, and to that spoken 4,000 or 5,000 years later in the Kurgan region as secondary or proto-Indo-European. It is clear that, genetically speaking, peoples of the Kurgan steppe… immigrated there from Turkey. To arrive north of the Black Sea, farmers from Turkey may have expanded west of the Black Sea, through Romania, and/or along the eastern coast of the Black Sea… Shortly after their arrival, these Neolithic farmers domesticated the horse… [later]… with the first development of bronze (around 5,000 years ago) they were on the brink of an expansion… there were many expansions, both eastward to Central Asia and westward toward Europe…34

The Celts came from the western part of the Kurgan area, originally from Turkey, very early on, he and other experts now believe. The Celtic languages are part of one of the major Indo-European branches of languages, along with Balto-Slavic, Italic, and Germanic subfamilies, as linguists and geneticists acknowledge. But, of course, there were also indigenous peoples present in Europe already, before these ‘waves’ of conquering Indo-Europeans arrived, of which little is known about today.

The strange case of the ‘Tartan Mummies’ of Takla Makan

If the Black Sea archaeological discovery mentioned earlier doesn’t seem surprising enough, consider this: another archaeological discovery was finally made public in the 1990s, involving the almost perfectly preserved 3,500 year-old mummies of an unknown, extinct people in China’s Takla Makan desert. This desert lies along the ancient ‘Great Silk Road’ between Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tibet. It is still one of the driest places on earth, so these mummies and their graves were incredibly well preserved for scientists to study.

This extraordinary discovery was featured in Britain on the BBC and in a Channel 4 documentary two years ago. With their reddish-blond hair, pale skin, long noses, round eyes and finely woven tartan clothing, these extraordinary mummies werescientifically proven to have had undeniably European roots. They are believed to be those of an early Indo-European people called the Tocharians, who migrated east from the southern steppes of Russia in earlier times.

But, understandably, this discovery has also caused a major political storm in China, as the mummies are clearly not of Chinese origin as they obviously have Caucasian features. The government there has called a halt to all excavation in the area. However, a team of western archaeologists did study them throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the results of which have more recently been made public.

But it is thetartan(or twill) woven clothing that was found on the mummies that is of special interest here. Specialist textile experts were also among the archaeological teams that were allowed to examine and test the mummies. InThe Tarim Mummies, Archaeologists Dr J P Mallory and Dr Victor H Mair state:

...the earliest twills known derive from the region between Turkey and the Caucasus where they are dated to the late 4th and 3rd millennium BC, and they are found in abundance from the late 2nd millennium BC in Europe… true twills are unknown in China until well into the 1st millennium BC. The Qizilchoqa twill is virtually identical to the textile fragments recovered from Hallstatt… the earliest Indo-Europeans would have known plaid twill and carried it west into central and western Europe, where it would later emerge among the Celts of the Hallstatt culture…35

Highly regarded ancient – textile expert Dr Elizabeth W Barber commented on the great similarity to Scottish tartan, saying:

Not only does this woollen plaid twill look like Scottish tartans, but it also has the same weight, feel and initial thickness as kilt cloth, and as the Hallstatt materials… If the Bronze and Iron Age ancestors of the historic Celts wove woollen plaid twills so similar to modern ones, clearly the prenationalist Scots in the intervening centuries wove this sort of thing too…36

Perhaps the references to the early Scythians, the Black Sea area, and so on, may now be better clarified in light of these recent scientific discoveries. The word ‘tartan’ itself derives from the Frenchtiretaine, a cloth that was half wool and half linen. The oldest tartan in Scotland dates from about 325AD, the early part of the 4th C. It was found near Falkirk and is now housed in the National Museum of Scotland.