This is Your Everest E-Book

Tom English

• Herausgeber: Polaris
• Kategorie: Lebensstil
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021

Seitenzahl: 597

Beschreibung

Shortlisted for the William Hill Sports Book of the Year 'Magnificent ... the pinacle of rugby writing' – Owen Slot, The Times The 1997 British & Irish Lions tour to South Africa is one of the most iconic in rugby history. Written off at home and abroad, Martin Johnson's men were given no hope of success against the world champion Springboks in their own backyard. But a combination of brilliant coaching, astute selections and outstanding players laid the foundations for the touring side's outstanding attacking mindset and brutal stonewall defence. On the other side was a team expected to stamp their authority on the tourists and confirm their place as the best side on the planet. But with political, racial and economic scandals swirling around the Springbok camp, plus a rookie coach parachuted into office just before the tour began, the hosts were under huge pressure. In a Test series that will go down in legend as one of the most compelling of all time, the sides could barely be separated. This is the inside story from both camps as they battle for supremacy, lifting the lid like never before as a huge cast of characters look back on those extraordinary weeks and the impact it had on their lives and careers thereafter. Hilarious, insightful and spine-chilling, Tom English and Peter Burns provide the perfect read for all Lions fans.

Leseprobe

THIS IS YOUR

EVEREST

THIS IS YOUR

EVEREST

THE LIONS, THE SPRINGBOKS ANDTHE EPIC TOUR OF 1997

TOM ENGLISHPETER BURNS

POLARIS PUBLISHING LTD

c/o Aberdein Considine2nd Floor, Elder HouseMultrees WalkEdinburghEH1 3DX

Distributed by Birlinn Limited

www.polarispublishing.com

Text copyright © Tom English and Peter Burns, 2021

ISBN: 9781913538125eBook ISBN: 9781913538132

The right of Tom English and Peter Burns to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Interviews have been edited and condensed for clarity.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the express written permission of the publisher.

The views expressed in this book do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or policies of Polaris Publishing Ltd (Company No. SC401508) (Polaris), nor those of any persons, organisations or commercial partners connected with the same (Connected Persons). Any opinions, advice, statements, services, offers, or other information or content expressed by third parties are not those of Polaris or any Connected Persons but those of the third parties. For the avoidance of doubt, neither Polaris nor any Connected Persons assume any responsibility or duty of care whether contractual, delictual or on any other basis towards any person in respect of any such matter and accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by any such matter in this book.

Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders and obtain their permission for the use of copyright material. The publisher apologises for any errors or omissions and would be grateful if notified of any corrections that should be incorporated in future reprints or editions of this book.

British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available on request from the British Library.

Designed and typeset by Polaris Publishing, EdinburghPrinted in Great Britain by Clays, St Ives

CONTENTS

PROLOGUE

ONE: THE DEATH OF DANIEL BONGANE

TWO: IT’S THE KAFFIRS, MAN

THREE: EIGHT BOKS OF THE APOCALYPSE

FOUR: TELFER

FIVE: IT HAD TO BE JOHNNO

SIX: WE DOUBLED DOWN, REMORTGAGED THE HOUSE

SEVEN: KOBUS WIESE IS ANGRY

EIGHT: HE KEPT HIS DEAFNESS SECRET

NINE: ONE-ALL, WANKER!

TEN: WE NEEDED TO SUFFER

ELEVEN: SOMETHING WASN’T RIGHT

TWELVE: VICTORY IS A FORMALITY, SAYS OS DU RANDT

THIRTEEN: TOM SMITH, BOSTON STRANGLER

FOURTEEN: LAWRENCE DALLAGLIO AND HIS JUTTY-OUT JAW

FIFTEEN: DO A JOB ON JOOST

SIXTEEN: EVEREST

SEVENTEEN: I TROD IN A DOG SHIT

EIGHTEEN: GARY TEICHMANN’S PAIN

NINETEEN: THE ASSASSIN JERRY GUSCOTT

TWENTY: COME ON JIM, WE’RE LEAVING

TWENTY-ONE: TRAGEDY OF THE FALLEN BOKS

TWENTY-TWO: WONDERWALL

EPILOGUE: THE ’97 LIONS WILL BE REMEMBERED FOREVER

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

To my lovely mum, Anne, for everything.TE

To Julie, Isla and Hector.PB

A Lion in South Africa is special.The Lions are special; the legends go with it.

IAN McGEECHAN

PROLOGUE

IN A CONFERENCE room deep in the bowels of the Lions’ team hotel in Cape Town, Jim Telfer was positioning chairs, setting them out in rows, then in a single line, muttering to himself the whole time, oblivious to the camera trained upon him. ‘We’ve got to be sharp as a fucking knife . . . There’s no way we go back . . . We take every step forward . . .’

Preparing his final address before the Lions ran out to play South Africa in Newlands in the first Test of the momentous summer of 1997, Telfer was in a world of his own. For more than a month he had pushed his players harder than he’d ever pushed players before – and that was saying something. Just behind him there was a flip chart. On it he had written some put-downs taken directly from the South African press. Meat and drink to the great man.

Hadn’t he feasted on this stuff when coaching Scotland to a Grand Slam in 1984, hadn’t he made hay with talk of England’s supremacy when assisting Ian McGeechan in another Scottish Slam in 1990? Some of the South African newspapers had written off the Lions and it was those headlines that Telfer gravitated towards. He’d heard all that bombast before. Every last word.

Their weak point is the scrum

The Boks must exploit this weakness

The Boks must concentrate on the eight-man shove every scrum

Scrummaging will be the key

Their weakness is the scrum

He surveyed the room. Straightened a chair and checked his watch. The forwards would be here soon. ‘Everest,’ he whispered. ‘This is your fucking Everest . . .’

*

Across the city at the Cape Sun Hotel, Springbok head coach Carel du Plessis was preparing to give his own team talk to a group of players who’d already started having silent misgivings about him. Nice guy, but talked in riddles sometimes. A Springbok playing legend, but what did he know about going head-to-head with the McGeechans and the Telfers of this world? And what was that bullshit he said when appointed to the gig only a few short months ago? ‘You don’t need to have coached to be able to coach the Springboks. All you need is vision – and I have the vision.’

The vision that the Boks appreciated the most was that of an opponent bent double in a scrum or disorientated in a ruck, a man broken in body and mind by the relentless men in green and gold. They understood brute force and physical domination, some of the qualities that had made them world champions two years before. They had issues with their coach but they also had certainty about their ability to win regardless. They had too much power up front, too much class behind. To a man they were cocksure they had the artillery to put the Lions to sleep.

These uppity Lions travelling around the country beating up the provinces with their flowing rugby and their easy style. These tourists who thought they were something because they rolled over some weakened sides. Thirty-eight points against Western Province, forty-two points against Natal, fifty-one points against the Emerging Springboks, sixty-four points against Mpumalanga.

That was peace-time, though. This was war. Os du Randt, Naka Drotske and Adrian Garvey – the Lions had not scrummaged against such an awesome force before, not this summer, not ever. In behind them, Hannes Strydom and Mark Andrews – world champions, both. In the back row, Ruben Kruger, André Venter and Gary Teichmann – aggression, athleticism, class.

The Lions had shown they could play, but the Springboks weren’t in any mood to let them. This was fifteen versus fifteen, but really it was eight versus eight. The series would be decided in the forward battle and the Boks had more beasts than any game reserve. ‘I don’t believe in false modesty,’ Andrews had said. ‘I can, without blushing, say that I’m the greatest forward in my position on the planet.’

Andrews was asked about Martin Johnson, the towering Lions captain. ‘I’ve heard a lot about him,’ he said. ‘I just hope he can live up to what is written about him. He could get very demoralised if it doesn’t work out.’ That day in Cape Town was when Andrews and his band of bruisers intended to show Johnson and his Lions what Springbok rugby was all about.

CHAPTER ONE

THE DEATH OF DANIEL BONGANE

ON THE DOORNKOP farm in the conservative hotbed of Western Transvaal, Jan Tromp and his son Henry were judge and jury when it came to allegations of petty theft among the labourers on their payroll. Daniel Bongane was black and sixteen years old when he found himself accused of stealing seventy-five rand – about eleven quid – from a fellow worker. To the Tromps there was only one way to settle this. They produced a fan belt, got two other farmhands to hold the boy down and then took it in turns to use it as a lash on Bongane, Tromp Snr hitting the teenager five times, Tromp Jnr delivering twice as many blows, each one more savage than the next.

Bongane bled to death. The Tromps were brought up on a charge of manslaughter and were sentenced to two years apiece for assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. An appeal court cut the punishment in half. In the end they did four months and returned to their old life. For Henry Tromp, in his mid-twenties, that old life was part farmer, part rugby player. And not just any rugby player. Tromp was a hooker with a burgeoning reputation, a player of mighty strength, mobility and promise. It was 1993 and in two years’ time South Africa would host the World Cup, their first appearance in the tournament since emerging from sporting isolation. Tromp was a live contender to make the squad, until that business with Bongane – an ‘altercation’ as one newspaper with apartheid-leaning tendencies put it at the time.

Kitch Christie, the shrewd Springbok coach, selected three hookers in his World Cup party, but Tromp wasn’t one of them. He was talented, but toxic. Christie recognised the mood and ran a mile. When the Boks went on to beat the All Blacks in a final of spine-tingling drama and emotion, nobody gave so much as a passing thought to Henry Tromp. In these early glimpses of what everybody prayed could be a new and better South Africa, François Pienaar, the victorious captain, and Nelson Mandela, the great president, shared an unforgettable moment that symbolised hope and unity.

‘I grew up in an Afrikaner community, went to an Afrikaner school, spoke only Afrikaans,’ Pienaar said years later, when talking about the country of his youth. ‘Children were seen and not heard and you believed the publicity of the day. I remember when I heard Nelson Mandela’s name mentioned at barbecues or dinner parties, the words “terrorist” or “bad man” were an umbilical cord almost to his name. As a young kid I wish I’d questioned it, but I never did. I just thought that guy’s maybe not a good guy, because sadly we didn’t engage with our parents. You didn’t ask questions like why black kids didn’t go to school with you, why it was all just white. That’s how you grew up, which is very wrong and very sad. I wish I’d had the courage of my convictions to ask questions, but I didn’t. During those six weeks [of the World Cup], what happened in this country was incredible. I’m still gobsmacked when I think back to the profound change that happened.’

There were 60,000 people in Ellis Park for the final and 59,000 of them were white. After Joel Stransky’s extra-time drop goal saw off one of the greatest All Black sides of them all, Mandela appeared in the green and gold Springbok jersey, for so long the symbol of apartheid, and walked out into an arena dominated by Afrikaners. He was now being celebrated by some people who had previously been content to see him rot in prison on Robben Island.

Looking back on one of the most famous scenes in rugby history, the captain now wishes he’d hugged Mandela on the podium. ‘He handed the trophy to me and said: “François, thank you for what you have done for South Africa.” I said to him: “No, Mr Mandela. Thank you for what you have done for South Africa.”’ When the final whistle went, said Pienaar, ‘This country changed for ever.’

Maybe Pienaar said it more in hope than expectation because barely a year had passed before the name Henry Tromp came to the surface again and with it came ugliness, rancour and the kind of complexity that makes South Africa the most enduringly fascinating rugby country on the planet.

In August of 1996, the Springboks were preparing for a Tri Nations match followed by a three-Test series against the All Blacks in their citadels in Cape Town, Durban, Pretoria and Johannesburg – and a debate about Tromp raged all the while. Should he or shouldn’t he be capped? The arguments, and the people making the arguments, illustrated with crystal clarity the labyrinthine nature of rugby politics in South Africa.

Steve Tshwete was sports minister in the African National Congress government. Born in Springs on the Witwatersrand in what was then Transvaal but is now Gauteng, Tshwete was a black activist. He joined the ANC in the late 1950s and when the organisation was banned he went underground and became leader of its military wing. Captured in 1963, he was sentenced to fifteen years on Robben Island where he became president of the prison rugby club. If anybody had cause to oppose Tromp’s elevation to Springbok status it was Tshwete, but he didn’t. By 1996, Tshwete was all about reconciliation. He felt that Tromp had done his time and deserved his chance.

So, too, did Mluleki George, another activist who was rounded up by apartheid forces and put away for five years from 1978. George was now vice president of the South African Rugby Football Union (Sarfu). ‘Tromp deserved the sentence he got but I believe he has paid for his sins,’ he said. A phone poll carried out by the Star newspaper, one of the nation’s leading dailies, recorded seventy per cent opposition to Tromp’s selection. Many of the callers were white South Africans. Some vowed that they would never again pay to watch the Springboks play if Tromp was given the nod. Two black icons of the struggle against apartheid expressing support for Tromp’s inclusion and thousands of Afrikaners going the other way – Tromp became South Africa’s perplexing mystery in microcosm.

The arrival of the Lions was less than a year away, but on the pitch and off it, South African rugby was unravelling. The waves of optimism that swept over the nation when François and Nelson had danced together at Ellis Park had now largely gone. Kitch Christie, the coach so beloved by the World Cup-winning Boks, had also left the scene. Christie had contracted leukaemia – he would die in 1998 – and had to step down, a horrible blow to the players who had come to look on him not just as a coach but also as a father figure. Christie was a disciplinarian but he was a brilliant man-manager. The Springboks won every single game under his leadership. His players would have run through walls for him.

André Markgraaff was his successor. Like Christie before him, Markgraaff had never played Test rugby but he had been a Junior Springbok lock, a successful businessman and had forged a strong reputation as an intelligent provincial coach with Griqualand West in Kimberly in the Northern Cape. He had also proved to be a popular figure during his brief time as Christie’s assistant.

New Zealand arrived in Cape Town in August of 1996 already crowned Tri Nations champions, but the Springboks looked back to their best when they went into an 18–6 lead thanks to tries from prop Os du Randt and centre Japie Mulder along with two penalties and a conversion from Joel Stransky’s boot. Shortly after half-time, however, Pienaar went to tackle Sean Fitzpatrick and took a knee to the side of the head. He was knocked out cold. He tried to play on but five minutes later he collapsed to the ground and was stretchered off.

Deep inside Newlands, Pienaar slowly came to his senses. Morné du Plessis, the team manager, came down to see how he was doing – and to break the news that in the subsequent minutes, the All Blacks had roared back into the game. When the full-time whistle blew, the Springboks had been defeated 29–18. Pienaar could barely believe his ears. To add salt to wound, he missed the entirety of the subsequent three-match series through injury.

‘That was one of the hardest games of my career,’ said scrum-half Joost van der Westhuizen later. ‘I couldn’t believe we lost. We lost a sense of direction when François left the field. That’s no criticism of Gary [Teichmann, who took over the captaincy], but we’d got so used to François leading us over the previous few seasons and I think we would have held on if he hadn’t been injured.’

With the Tri Nations now behind them, focus turned to the series. There was a different mentality when it came to an All Black tour. The Tri Nations was in its infancy; what was not was the rivalry between the Boks and the All Blacks. Despite nearly seventy years of trying, the All Blacks had never managed to win a series in South Africa, while the Boks still crowed about the legend of Boy Louw, Danie Craven, Ebbo Bastard and the mighty team of 1937 who had won their series in New Zealand.

With Pienaar ruled out with concussion, Teichmann was made Springbok captain. ‘The captaincy was never something that I had aspired to – or even really wanted,’ he reflects. ‘But when François was ruled out and André asked me to step up, I had to accept. I had some encouraging words from my father and changed my mindset to embrace the challenge. But within hours of my appointment a storm blew up when some New Zealand journalists reported seeing James Small out at a nightclub at one in the morning on the Friday before the Test. James was initially dropped from the squad, then reinstated, summoned to a disciplinary hearing, hauled over the coals and then dropped again. At least, I think that was the sequence of events.’

Having sat as an unused substitute in Cape Town, Henry Tromp came into the starting line-up for his debut in the first Test of the series in Durban, packing down opposite Sean Fitzpatrick. The Boks lost again, 23–19.

‘The series moved to Pretoria,’ said Teichmann, ‘and we were being hit by the press who said we were on the brink of ignominy, the first team in Springbok history to lose a home series to the All Blacks. Our backs were pinned to the wall.’

Tromp kept his place in the side for this mammoth occasion. The All Blacks were on the brink of rugby immortality; the Springboks on the cusp of disgrace. It proved to be one of the great encounters between the old rivals. All Black scrum-half Justin Marshall darted and probed, Jeff Wilson seared down the wing to score two tries, replacement scrum-half Jon Preston came off the bench to kick two long-range penalties under blistering pressure, and number eight Zinzan Brooke played like a man from another planet, his gargantuan workload topped off with a try and an audacious drop goal. In response, the Springboks scored tries through flanker Ruben Kruger, lock Hannes Strydom and Joost van der Westhuizen with 11 points coming via Stranky’s boot. As the score settled at 33–26 in New Zealand’s favour, Teichmann’s men battered the All Black line in an effort to score the converted try they needed to draw the match and take the series to the final game at Ellis Park. But they just couldn’t break the All Black wall. At the final whistle players from both sides collapsed to the turf, utterly spent. Fitzpatrick thumped his fist on the ground in triumph.

‘Exhaustion just flooded every cell of my body,’ recalled Teichmann. ‘I lay on my back, eyes closed, racked with pain. I heard nothing, saw nothing. Everything was screaming: my legs, my arms, my knees and the history books had just been rewritten. It was agony.’

The All Blacks, still hurting from the World Cup final, had their revenge. It didn’t make up for what had happened the previous summer at Ellis Park, but routing the South Africans in their own back yard was glorious all the same.

The third Test was a dead rubber as far as the series went, but not for the Springboks who were determined to make amends. It may have been too little, too late, but they played some fantastic attacking rugby, scoring a sweeping opening try that was finished under the posts by Van der Westhuizen, who then turned provider when he darted for the line from a tapped penalty and slipped the ball to André Venter to score, while André Joubert added three penalties to his own try and Henry Honiball contributed a conversion and a penalty. The New Zealanders had been outmatched for most of it, two late tries from Walter Little and Justin Marshall just about taking the dirty look off the scoreline. The Springboks saved some face with a 32–22 victory. In terms of the series result it was immaterial; what was compelling, though, was the growing shift in mood among watchers of the Boks.

Like Tshwete and George, Trevor Manuel had been an ANC activist back in the day, regularly detained in his early years for his firebrand opposition to the way things were in his homeland. In 1994 he was elected as an ANC member of parliament and was soon given the brief of Minister for Trade and Industry by Nelson Mandela. By 1996, as Minister of Finance, he was a high-ranking figure in government.

Manuel made no bones about who he was supporting during the All Blacks trip to South Africa – he was, unreservedly and unapologetically, on New Zealand’s side. The feelgood of Ellis Park 1995 seemed to wash right over Manuel, the notion that the Springboks were now a team for all South Africans and not just white South Africans cut no ice with him, not when there wasn’t a single black player in the Springboks squad now that Chester Williams was injured, and not when Tromp was welcomed into the fold despite the brutal death of Daniel Bongane. During that series with the All Blacks, more and more home fans waved the old flag of the apartheid era. That wasn’t lost on Manuel either.

That series defeat to the All Blacks was a bad enough beginning to his reign but there was worse – much worse – to come for André Markgraaff. Things had become strained between the coach and the captain François Pienaar. ‘I could see that André was a clever man and his understanding of the game was beyond question,’ said Pienaar, ‘but I didn’t think he was sure what he wanted to do tactics-wise. I took the decision to take a much stronger hand as captain.’ It was a decision that wasn’t welcomed by the coach.

At the end of 1996, Markgraaff named a squad for a tour to Argentina, France and Wales and though available again after missing the series against the All Blacks, the World Cup-winning captain was not in it. Troubled by Pienaar’s totemic stature and constantly disagreeing with him about tactics and selection, Markgraaff cut him loose – and it was a sensation. A media poll attracted tens of thousands of responses, ninety-six per cent of whom wanted Markgraaff sacked for his lack of respect towards one of South Africa’s most beloved figures. The anger was raw. Henry Tromp, who had beaten a black man to death, was on the trip, but the heroic Pienaar, a powerful force for unity in a divided country, was not. He’d never play for the Springboks again. ‘It’s not the way I would have liked to finish my Test career . . . but there it is,’ said Pienaar. ‘It’s well documented that I didn’t really agree with certain things that happened around that time. If there was more honesty, I would have appreciated it. But there wasn’t. I don’t really want to talk about it anymore.’

The fallout was colossal. Markgraaff was inundated with hate mail, some of which even contained death threats. The newspapers went after him as well. ‘The public hanging of a national hero impacts not just on the game, but on the nation,’ wrote The Mail & Guardian. ‘Outrage grows over the weekend sacking of charismatic Springbok captain François Pienaar, hero of the country’s Rugby World Cup championship last year,’ reported the South African Press Association. Even The New York Times got in on the story: ‘It seems that South African rugby has much in common with American baseball. The two can’t help but destroy themselves.’ Writing in Le Monde in France, Frederic Chambon eloquently summarised the situation: ‘The sidelining of the Springboks’ captain, the most popular player in the country, has caused a national psychodrama.’

The next day, Springbok selector Ray Mordt and Sarfu executive committee member Keith Parkinson both quit their jobs in protest. ‘I want nothing more to do with the national team,’ raged Mordt. ‘The coach gets the team he wants. I’m finished as a selector.’

‘It is a sad day for South African rugby,’ said Kitch Christie. ‘How can you do that to a man who made this country so proud?’

Gary Teichmann: It caused outrage. This was just sixteen months after François led the Springboks to victory in the World Cup and now he was being left out of a squad of thirty-six players. The story was everywhere – all over the radio, on TV, in the newspapers.

Os du Randt: But no one was looking at the fact that François was struggling with form.

Gary Teichmann: He was only twenty-nine – he was hardly history.

Os du Randt: All the injuries he’d sustained during the preceding years were taking their toll and it reflected in his game. He’d had several concussions which affected his reactions and timing and he wasn’t as good a defender as he’d been before. François was left out because he wouldn’t make the team on his standard of play.

Mark Andrews: Markgraaff had a battle with François and there was lots of dissent and unhappiness within the group. But personally, I enjoyed being coached by Markgraaff. He was all about the players – they were his priority. With him, the team always came first.

Joost van der Westhuizen: François had been so close to Kitch Christie, it was always going to be awkward, but any team takes a strong cue from the relationship between the coach and the captain, and the players are usually the first to sense any lack of harmony. It wasn’t easy, but I don’t think either André or François was to blame. It was the situation. The players wanted everything to be the same as in 1995, but it wasn’t working. The squad was starting to divide: you were either a Markgraaff man or a Pienaar man. I was trying to keep out of the whole situation because I respected both of them. Sometimes you can get the atmosphere right and other times just get it wrong.

André Markgraaff: It was one of those situations that develops when a person is revered by everyone for something he has done and he becomes almost untouchable, but sooner or later a change would have had to be made.

Joost van der Westhuizen: It seemed to us that André wanted to be in complete charge of the team and that wouldn’t be the case while François was captain. There didn’t seem to be a particularly healthy relationship between André and Morné du Plessis either. The management team had worked so well during the World Cup, it was quite a shock to sense the tension at training and around the hotels. The vibe wasn’t good, but we were still a powerful team.

André Markgraaff also had other problems on his hands – playing contracts. After more than a century of staunch – and often draconian – protection of the game’s amateur status, the International Rugby Board had finally bowed its head to modernity after the 1995 World Cup and announced that the sport was going to go professional. As giant television companies around the world vied for control of this new professional entity it became clear very quickly that the Springboks would play a massive role in determining the future direction of the sport. The Australian tycoon, Kerry Packer, began to pitch his vision for a fully professional version of the game, which he called the World Rugby Championship.

The WRC proposed a northern and southern hemisphere league, with the respective winners of each playing off for the title of World Club Champions. The WRC would pay the players’ wages and offer the unions forty-nine per cent ownership of the franchises in exchange for using their existing stadiums. It was a bold, imaginative and innovative vision that could have borne significant fruit for all involved. And Louis Luyt was having none of it.

Luyt was the hectoring bully in charge of Sarfu, the president described by turns as a boorishly fractious individual with an unquenchable self-regard, or a bit of a sociopath with few redeeming graces. Nelson Mandela once called him a ‘pitiless dictator’.

He was born Oswald Louis Petrus Poley. When his father was exposed as a polygamist and his mother annulled their marriage, he took the name of his grandfather and became Louis Luyt. He was a talented rugby player with the Free State, but not quite as talented as he claimed to be over the years. Luyt became a pillar of the Afrikaner world and regarded rugby as a white man’s sport, their own personal fiefdom. He was close to the apartheid establishment and made little attempt to transform the game’s racial profile. Throughout his presidency he was blighted by allegations of racism and nepotism.

There was always a feeling with Luyt that he was only in it for himself. One by one he pissed everybody off. When South Africa won the World Cup in 1995 he caused a walkout at the post-final function when he pompously claimed that if it hadn’t been for isolation, South Africa would have won the previous two World Cups to boot.

Luyt manoeuvred his way from relative poverty to kingpin status in the Transvaal Rugby Union to the top job in 1989. He packed a lot of power into his giant frame and he wasn’t giving any of it away to the likes of Kerry Packer.

Packer needed South Africa on board if his venture was to take flight, but Luyt headed it off at the pass. Just when it looked like François Pienaar was going to be the totem for the new WRC, there was a change of heart. Pienaar suddenly backed away. Captains and senior players from other countries were literally waiting for him at a meeting to move the project to the next level but Pienaar never showed. The Springboks withdrew from Packer’s brave new world and the project died a death thereafter.

Luyt had committed to putting the World Cup-winning Boks on lucrative new deals. For the world champions, he pushed the boat out, albeit reluctantly. It cost the union a fortune – and Louis didn’t like it. The repercussions were serious. In negotiating a better financial deal for his teammates, Pienaar had upset Luyt. That was one very powerful enemy. Some will always believe that Pienaar’s sacking was belated revenge for forcing Luyt’s hand.

The new contracts were welcomed with open arms by the heroes of 1995 but by the time the World Cup-winners were looked after there wasn’t a whole lot left for the rest, the boys who had emerged in the wake of the great triumph against the All Blacks. Men like Gary Teichmann, the new captain in the post-Pienaar age.

Gary Teichmann: It is very difficult when you’re supposed to play as one team but you have different players being paid vastly different amounts for essentially doing the same thing. Henry Honiball, André Venter and I weren’t on World Cup contracts, so we got rawer deals than the guys who had them. I remember Louis Luyt said to me, ‘You will get this much per game and this much per day and if you don’t like it, I will get three other okes to do the job.’ Because there were so few of us non-World Cup players, we knew he probably could have done just that. So I told Henry that we’d better just accept the offer, even though we weren’t being paid anywhere near what the World Cup-winners were getting. They made up the bulk of the squad, so there wasn’t that much unhappiness, but the situation started to change quite quickly. More and more new guys were coming in, replacing the World Cup guys, and Henry was becoming a key player in the team. He started to get the shits. He wasn’t being paid enough to justify being away from his farm.

One day in a meeting he told André Markgraaff that he could earn more money just sitting on his farm. Sarfu had a lot of money tied up in the contracted guys. It caused unhappiness and Markgraaff was the guy who had to find the money.

Henry Honiball: It felt as if Markgraaff was constantly discussing our contracts with us. We weren’t asking for a lot of money, but they were playing hardball. I remember that, at one of those meetings, I was looking at my watch while Markgraaff was talking. He asked me what I was doing and I told him I was working out if I could get back to my farm in Winterton by nightfall. I said I was ready to go back because I could get more money from farming. The tactic must have worked, because Markgraaff got us the money we were asking for.

Joost van der Westhuizen: We tried to bond as a team but it was difficult when players were effectively being paid according to their status in 1995 rather than on current form. I know some people started to resent the World Cup players because their contracts guaranteed payments regardless of results or even whether they were playing. It was said some players didn’t mind if they were picked or not, since they’d earn the same either way. I think it’s true that some guys sat back and relaxed. For my part, I don’t think my approach to the game changed. I still desperately wanted to play for the Boks. That was the way I was brought up. Money wasn’t going to change that.

Gary Teichmann: At Natal we had Mark Andrews, André Joubert and James Small earning anything between six and ten times as much as their teammates. It was the same everywhere. Provincial players were invariably given one-year contracts loaded towards match fees rather than monthly salaries, but the World Cup Springboks, some of whom were on the brink of retirement, had been given three-year deals with the income guaranteed whether they played or not. It was absolutely catastrophic for team dynamics within the Test squad. There’s no doubt in my mind that a lot of the problems we experienced in 1996 and 1997 were largely caused by that underlying issue. We spent far too much time talking, worrying and arguing about money. It was a shit show. Just one thing after another. We were wallowing in our problems.

André Markgraaff: Rugby seemed to be the last thing on anyone’s mind.

CHAPTER TWO

IT’S THE KAFFIRS, MAN

ANDRÉ MARKGRAAFF HAD a turbulent start to his coaching reign, but after the victory in the final Test against the All Blacks he was determined to keep the momentum going on the end-of-year tour. Before they could leave South Africa, not only did he have to deal with the fallout of the François Pienaar affair, he also had to reconfigure his backroom staff.

Morné du Plessis stepped down from the manager’s role in August, disturbed by the waving of apartheid-era flags during the Test against the Wallabies in Bloemfontein during the Tri Nations. Du Plessis issued a statement condemning the gesture. He himself then came under attack for his statement and was left hung out to dry by Sarfu. The lack of support from Louis Luyt was too much for the former Springbok captain and he tendered his resignation.

With Du Plesssis gone, Markgraaff assumed all the responsibilities for team management. He appointed three young coaches as his assistants for the tour – Nick Mallett came in to help with the forwards, Hugh Rees-Edwards with the backs and Carel du Plessis was appointed as a general technical advisor.

It was vital that the tour was a success for the players on and off the field – and, despite everything, it was. Markgraaff’s new-look team recorded two thumping wins over the Pumas in Buenos Aires, then defeated France in Bordeaux and at the Parc des Princes (and in so doing became the first Springbok team to win a series on French soil), and then steamrollered Wales in Cardiff in the last Test to be played at the old Arms Park. ‘At the end of the tour I was exhausted, relieved and proud of my team,’ said Teichmann. ‘The 1995 World Cup was history. This new squad were the real deal and we flew home looking forward to the twin challenges in 1997 of the British and Irish Lions tour and mounting a serious campaign in the Tri Nations.’

At the end of an intense and tumultuous thirteen-Test year, Markgraaff had won six in a row; after enduring severe criticism and scrutiny at the start of his time, his team were now beginning to purr. The Springboks were playing devastating, expansive rugby; their set piece was rock solid and their defence was dominant. ‘We can look forward to the Lions tour with real confidence,’ declared the head coach in the aftermath of the Cardiff victory.

But there was another storm brewing. A calamitous one.

In October 1996, Markgraaff met with André Bester, one of his former provincial players at Griqualand West. After a while the conversation turned to the dropping of François Pienaar and the intense flak Markgraaff had received from the English-speaking media, particulalry the TV channel, Top Sport. Markgraaff had no idea that Bester was recording the conversation.

‘The whole fucking Pienaar thing is politics,’ raged Markgraaff, ‘the whole fucking country is behind him – in terms of the press. Top Sport is the media. TV is the government. Top Sport is the government. It is a kaffir station . . . it is for the kaffirs . . . it’s the government, the whole fucking lot, it’s the government. That guy [Pienaar] can be walking on fucking crutches, but they still fucking want him . . . it’s the kaffirs, man . . . it’s the fucking kaffirs.’

Bester was a former captain of the Griquas; he and his brother Piet, also a Griqua, had a simmering grudge against Markgraaff for failing to renew their contracts with the province when he had been president of the union. André Bester later claimed that he had recorded the conversation because Markgraaff had reneged on a promise to make him the director of coaching at the Griquas. ‘I taped the meeting so that, if my agreement wasn’t honoured, I could have used it,’ said Bester. In February 1997, the Besters leaked their recording to the press.

It was 8.00 p.m. on 17 February when the SABC (South African Broadcasting Company) released a snippet of the recording. Markgraaff later claimed that the audio had been doctored and that he had paid Dr Len Jansen, an expert in voice recordings, a vast amount of money to prove it. He admitted that he may have been drawn to utter the word ‘kaffir’ once, but not the numerous times it appeared on the tape. As if it really mattered how many times he said it. Once was more than enough.

The fallout was seismic. Markgraaff called a press conference in his hometown of Kimberley. He was in tears as he spoke. ‘I’m not making any excuses, but I was very emotional at the time,’ he said. ‘I apologise to the black people of this country and to the whites for causing them embarrassment. I’ve not acted in a spirit of reconciliation and I hope you will forgive me. This is not easy for me and I herewith tender my resignation as coach of the Springbok rugby team.’

‘I admired the way Markgraaff handled the situation because he didn’t deny anything,’ said the Springbok hooker, James Dalton, years later. ‘He took accountability, called a media conference and explained the context to what he said, why he said it and to whom it was said. He then resigned, knowing the scandal was too big to save him as the Springbok coach. I watched his conference and felt sorry for him as he wept. I knew the feeling of addressing the country and being reduced to tears because the emotion was overwhelming. It had happened to me after my suspension from the 1995 Rugby World Cup after a fight broke out in the game against Canada. I know Markgraaff wasn’t everyone’s kind of person, but I’d grown to understand him on the 1996 end-of-season tour to Europe and, from a rugby perspective, I thought he and Gary Teichmann had formed a strong partnership as coach and captain.’

Markgraaff had been confident that the Springboks were back on the road to becoming the best team in the world, but now everything was in tatters. Not only was he gone, but an internecine war was breaking out between Louis Luyt at Sarfu and Steve Tshwete, the South African Minister of Sport, who wanted a state investigation into issues of racism and suspected financial irregularities within rugby’s governing body. Brian Van Rooyen, a lawyer and former Transvaal Rugby Union vice president, produced a 500-page dossier of alleged abuses and malpractices in Sarfu. Tshwete appointed a three-member task team to investigate Sarfu, a development which enraged Luyt and his son-in-law Rian Oberholzer, the Sarfu chief executive.

To add to the tumult, on 2 May 1997, it was announced that the Springbok lock, Johann Ackermann, and two Gauteng Lions players, Bennie Nortje and Stephan Bronkhorst, had tested positive for anabolic steroids. They were banned for two years. South African rugby was in freefall.

With Markgraaff gone, Sarfu needed to appoint a new head coach. With all the other pressures they were under, the executive committee decided that the easiest option was to simply promote one of Markgraaff’s assistant coaches. It seemed obvious to many that it would be Nick Mallett who would make the step-up. ‘Among the players,’ said Teichmann, ‘the consensus was that Nick would be named as the new Springbok coach. He’d been the dominant personality among the assistant coaches on tour and he appeared ready for the challenge.’

Having enjoyed a successful coaching stint in France, Mallett had returned to South Africa in 1995 to take charge of Boland – and transformed one of the country’s weakest provincial teams into Currie Cup quarter-finalists. His work with the Springbok forwards on the end-of-year tour had been widely regarded as excellent. But while Mallett may have been lauded by pundits and fans, behind the scenes he was regarded with suspicion. Having fiercely criticised the Sarfu executive committee in a magazine article – and been dragged over the coals for it – he had made enemies. There was a school of thought within the corridors of power that he was too headstrong and too emotional for the top job. Mallett got bypassed. Instead, it was Carel du Plessis who was offered the role. It was a decision that stunned the country.

In the wake of the appointment, the journalist Donald McRae sat down with James Small at his home in Cape Town. ‘Shit,’ sighed Small when the conversation turned to the Springboks, ‘we’ve had five coaches in the past four years. On the tour back in December we’d started to sort things out again. Everybody had found their place in the squad. Now with a new coach, Carel du Plessis, who hasn’t done much coaching at all, there’s a whole new ball game. Players don’t like this kind of uncertainty because it kills your confidence. So, right now, it’s very unsettled in South African rugby. We’ve got all this shit off the field and, on it, no one knows what the new coach is thinking or which players he might want to use. We’re starting from a clean slate – again.’

Du Plessis was born in the Eastern Cape in June of 1960. He made his debut as the Springbok head coach against Tonga in Cape Town on 10 June 1997, just two weeks before his thirty-seventh birthday. That Test with Tonga was the only game his Springboks played before they faced the Lions. Set against the ferocious backdrop of the Tromp, Markgraaff, Ackermann and Sarfu scandals, he faced a daunting start.

Du Plessis had never played against the Lions, but he had a long history with them. As a twelve year old boy he had stood with his father on the terraces at Boet Erasmus Stadium when the Lions clinched the 1974 series with victory in the third Test. He had been utterly entranced by the tourists and the image of Gordon Brown punching the air at full time had seared itself on his mind forever after. It was the audacious attacking talents of the Lions’ backline that made the most lasting impression, though. ‘To this day if you think about the ’74 Lions, the names just trip off the tongue,’ said Du Plessis in almost misty-eyed admiration. ‘JPR Williams, Andy Irvine, Gerald Davies, JJ Williams, Ian McGeechan, Phil Bennett and Gareth Edwards. What a team.’ He missed out the Irish centre, Dick Milliken, but there was no doubt that Du Plessis was entranced.

He forged a glittering career with Western Province, establishing a reputation as one of the all-time greats of South African rugby. People called him ‘the Prince of Wings’. Because South Africa were in international isolation for the majority of his career he only played twelve Tests and never had the chance to face the Lions – he was too young to play against Bill Beaumont’s class of 1980 and when it looked like he might finally have a chance against Colin Deans’ 1986 team, the tour was cancelled. He retired in 1989 aged just twenty-nine, but with a heavily laden trophy cabinet. Du Plessis scored eighty-one tries in 108 games for Western Province, captained the side on fifty-seven occasions and won five Currie Cups alongside his brothers Willie and Michael. In his final season, he scored twenty-five tries, a Western Province record.

As a partner in a successful Cape Town financial services company he could have walked away from the game without a backwards glance, but he couldn’t leave it behind. He became an assistant coach with the University of Western Cape and then, out of the blue, Markgraaff called him in late 1996 and asked him to join his Springbok staff as a technical adviser for the end-of-season tour.

When Markgraaff resigned in February 1997, Du Plessis was among those who expected Mallett to be offered the head coach position. He was as shocked as anyone when Sarfu offered him the gig. He had never been a head coach – at any level. In truth, he had hardly even been a coach. A lifetime of wanting to represent the Springboks had been reduced to a handful of appearances because of isolation. Now he had a chance to do as a coach what he had never done as a player – lead a team of world champions against the Lions, the team that had captured his imagination as a child.

In many ways you could see the logic of Sarfu’s decision. In the aftermath of the Bester tapes, the understated Du Plessis was a safe option. The Prince of Wings was a clean-cut poster boy of South African rugby, the perfect antidote to the travails that had been continually befalling the Springboks since the turn of 1996. The appointment of a new black team manager, Arthob Petersen, also helped reinforce the sense of a fresh start.

‘There have been questions raised about my suitability,’ reflected Du Plessis ahead of the Lions’ visit. ‘I thought there would be a reaction as it’s traditionally a position filled by someone with more experience. I accept that and now have to try and live up to the responsibility. If I didn’t believe that I could make a difference and have some valuable input then I wouldn’t have made myself available.’

Du Plessis decided against retaining Nick Mallett as assistant coach and instead appointed his former Stellenbosch, Western Province and Springbok teammate Gert Smal as his number two. Smal had been a robust flanker whose career had been cut short by a knee injury. He had sealed his place in Springbok rugby folklore for knocking out All Black prop Gary Knight with a counter-punch during the New Zealand Cavaliers’ rebel tour to South Africa in 1986.

Gary Teichmann: Carel phoned me a few days after his appointment and asked if I would meet with him and Gert. He flew up from Cape Town and we all had breakfast at the Elangeni Hotel on Durban’s beachfront. Carel said he wanted me to remain as Springbok captain and was eager to hear what I believed the priorities were for the squad. I talked about the advantages of shorter and more intense training sessions, but I was much more intrigued to know which direction he wanted to take.

My impression was that he wanted to carry on where we left off in Wales. He seemed completely sincere and honest, young and enthusiastic. I left the meeting thinking that we could work successfully together, but there’s no doubt that there was a nagging worry that he was inexperienced and we were moving forward on a bit of a wing and a prayer.

Du Plessis sounded like his own man when making his first state of the nation address. ‘I want to develop a multifaceted style of attacking, winning rugby in which South Africa will be innovators rather than followers in the world game,’ he said. ‘I am excited by the challenge, particularly because we have so many exceptionally gifted players, and I would hope that I can encourage the team to play with flair and a bit of risk.’

These words were music to the ears of the Springbok fans – but the pressure was on. Untried, untested, Du Plessis was not only entering a political and administrative storm, but also a sporting one – he had to follow in the footsteps of Kitch Christie and the towering achievements of the 1995 World Cup winners but without the experience of François Pienaar and other Ellis Park immortals. And in the dugout opposite he would have a most formidable rival, one of the greatest minds the rugby world has ever known, a man steeped in Lions legend and one of Du Plessis’ heroes from 1974 – Ian McGeechan.

CHAPTER THREE

EIGHT BOKS OF THE APOCALYPSE

GEECH STILL REMEMBERS the day the letter arrived, how he carefully sliced open the envelope, the first thing catching his eye being the embossed Lions badge on the top of the page. All these years later he can recall the sensation of standing in his hallway and staring at the words inviting him to be part of the 1974 Lions trip to South Africa. It still feels like it was yesterday.

That trip changed him. When he returned home his wife Judy said that he had a new confidence about him, a new belief in his own ability. He knew what it was to be a successful Lion and, as a coach, he desperately wanted that life-changing experience for his players. He was forty-two years old and only in his second season as head coach at Test level when he took charge of the Lions for the first time. It was 1989 and the Lions were in Australia. The visitors lost the first Test and won the next two to take the series. In his second spell, against New Zealand in 1993, the series went the other way, 2–1 to the All Blacks.

Those summers taught him much but he always said that 1974 was seminal. He had Ireland’s Dick Milliken as a midfield partner in the Test series and they’ve been friends ever since. That tour, and the endless amounts of defending that had to be done in the face of waves of demonic Springbok attacking, is still fresh in his mind. He drew on those experiences when speaking to his players in 1997.

He spoke about the thirty-eight-minute Springbok bombardment in the third Test in Port Elizabeth, the unadulterated aggression of the Boks as they tried to save the series. The Lions had won the first two Tests and would win the third as well, but only after withstanding a battering the like of which McGeechan never experienced before or after.

Those minutes spent protecting his own try line lived with him, their relevance growing over time. ‘The toughest thing I’ve ever been involved in,’ he said. ‘Dick and I were so under the cosh with these big men running at us time and time again that we never even had time to speak to each other. But we didn’t have to. We just looked at each other and got on with it – we had to find a way to exist in those long minutes. The Lions chemistry, the communal feeling, it comes from respect. Many of my Lions feelings spring from that third Test. Sometimes you don’t have to say anything to a fellow Lion, there’s just a look.’

All of the big moments in Geech’s rugby life happened after the death of his father. Bob McGeechan was brought up in Govan in sight of Ibrox, home of Glasgow Rangers. He was just five foot six inches tall; a useful boxer, a handy footballer, good enough to be a youth player at Rangers. But whatever dreams he might have had about becoming a professional footballer went before his twentieth birthday. He signed up for the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders as a stretcher-bearer in the medical corps and went to war.

Bob’s big mate was Ginger. Geech never knew the surname. On the odd occasion when Bob spoke about his army life he’d mention his pal and how close they were and what happened to him in the North African desert when their convoy came under fire from a low-flying Messerschmidt. Bob jumped out of the jeep to the left, Ginger jumped right. When the attack ceased, Bob crawled round the side of the vehicle to find Ginger lying dead.

His father’s life was short but inspirational. Bob contracted cancer but never complained once. People talk about mental strength on a rugby field, but the character of his dad in coping with his disease was courage of an altogether different dimension. Bob McGeechan died in 1969 at the age of forty-eight. He missed his son’s Scotland debut in 1972, missed him playing for the Lions in 1974 and 1977, missed him coaching his country to a Grand Slam in 1990. Geech tells a story about that famous day against England at Murrayfield. In the warm-up, Geech took a walk across the pitch. The Queen Victoria pipe band from Dunblane were getting ready to do their thing when the old pipe major approached Geech, told him that he’d gone to school with his father and that Bob would be very proud of him.

Geech was shocked and moved in equal measure. He said he didn’t believe in the spirit world, but in that moment he wanted, and chose, to believe that this was no coincidence, that on some level Bob was with him. After missing his greatest days as a player, it gave him comfort to think that he was looking down on his greatest day as a coach.

After Scotland, Geech went on to coach Northampton. Although he had been out of international rugby for three years by the time Lions manager Fran Cotton approached him to lead the tour in 1997, Cotton knew that there was no better man. Geech had the passion and the knowledge. Having done it twice already, he knew all about the wonderful possibilities and the dangerous pitfalls of the job.

Ian McGeechan: We had a fantastic squad in 1989 and every single player was good enough to play in the Tests. They enjoyed themselves and kept each other honest and there wasn’t a single player that we carried. In 1993 it was different. The squad had been chosen by committee and there were all sorts of trade-offs between countries and we ended up with six or seven players I wouldn’t have taken had it been down to me. It had a huge impact on the tour. I said never again. When Fran asked me if I would come back as head coach in ’97, I said I would, but on two conditions. Number one, I wanted to pick my own assistant coach; number two, I wanted myself, my assistant and Fran to pick the players – and nobody else. The tour was going to be hard enough without horse-trading. If I was going to fail then I was going to fail with the players I’d chosen. I blame myself for some of the things that went wrong in 1993. Towards the end of that tour some players lost heart as well as form and we allowed them to feel peripheral to what was happening. That was a mistake that I was determined to learn from.

In the summer of 1996, when the Springboks were hosting the All Blacks in that three-game series, he spent a week in camp with the New Zealanders. John Hart, the Kiwi coach, welcomed him in and gave him the benefit of his sometimes bitter experiences of touring South Africa. In those hours with Hart, Geech metamorphosed into a human sponge.

Ian McGeechan: John Hart was brilliant. New Zealand had learned from past tours that if they turned up for a training session at a rugby club, the scrum machine they had been promised would have mysteriously disappeared. There would be no rucking shields or tackle bags. They’d be given nothing. So they brought all their own equipment – they even brought their own scrum machine, which was unheard of at the time. We had to be self-sufficient and that was a first for the Lions.

The most important thing I learned was about the size of the squad and how to manage key positions. The All Blacks took an extra scrum-half and an extra hooker when they went to South Africa. We’d never done that before, but it was Sean Fitzpatrick who told me how important it was. It allowed him to get some rest through rotation. Without it, he’d have to start every game, or be on the bench, and he would have been knackered by the time it came to the Test series.

Sean Fitzpatrick: These were lessons that we’d learned over decades of touring there. The key to beating the Springboks is taking the game to them. They’re so passionate about their rugby, you feel you’re playing against the whole country. They don’t lie down and you can’t afford to let up for one minute. It’s a physical and mental challenge. You’ve got to be superbly fit and lucky with injuries, but part of managing that is through squad rotation. A long tour to South Africa is a great test of a player’s character. Anyone who plays in South Africa finds out a lot about themselves.

Ian McGeechan: John and I talked long and hard about what it took to beat the Springboks on their home patch. The All Blacks had thoroughly vetted every hotel and every training facility, so we did too – Fran went for a twelve-day reconnaissance mission to make sure that everything was just as we wanted it. We also had the biggest backup squad the Lions had ever taken. I produced a twenty page report on what I felt was needed to beat the Boks. I identified eight key players in their side. I got videos of every game those eight had played over the past two years. I wanted to know how they wanted to play so I could figure out a plan on how to stop them.