What He Must Be E-Book

Voddie Baucham Jr.

• Herausgeber: Crossway
• Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
• Sprache: Englisch

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2009

Beschreibung

All parents want their daughters to marry godly young men. But which qualities, specifically, should they be looking for? What will you say when that certain young man sits down in your living room, sweaty-palmed and tongue-tied, and asks your permission to marry your daughter? What criteria should he meet before the two of them join together for life? What He Must Be… If He Wants to Marry My Daughter outlines ten qualities parents should look for in a son-in-law, including trustworthiness, a willingness to lead his family, an understanding of his wife's role, and various spiritual leadership qualities. Author Voddie Baucham follows up on his popular book Family Driven Faith with this compelling apologetic of biblical manhood. By studying the principles outlined in his book, parents who want their daughter to marry a godly man-as well as those who want their sons to become godly men-will be well equipped to help their children look for and develop these God-honoring qualities.

Leseprobe

WHAT HE MUST BE

. . . if he wants to marry my daughter

VODDIE BAUCHAM JR.

CROSSWAY BOOKS

WHEATON, ILLINOIS

What He Must Be . . . If He Wants to Marry My Daughter

Copyright © 2009 by Voddie Baucham Jr.

Published in association with Yates & Yates, LLP, Attorneys and Counselors, Orange County, California

Published by Crossway Books

a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers1300 Crescent StreetWheaton, Illinois 60187

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, except as provided for by USA copyright law.

Cover design: Amy Bristow

Cover illustration: iStock

First printing, 2009

Printed in the United States of America

Unless otherwise indicated, Bible quotations are taken from TheHoly Bible: English Standard Version®. Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Scripture quotations indicated as from NIV are taken from TheHoly Bible: New International Version®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. The “NIV” and “New International Version” trademarks are registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office by International Bible Society. Use of either trademark requires the permission of International Bible Society.

All emphases in Scripture quotations have been added by the author.

ISBN PDF: 978-1-4335-0573-7

ISBN Mobipocket: 978-1-4335-0574-4

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Baucham, Voddie.

      What he must be — if he wants to marry my daughter / Voddie Baucham.

            p. cm.

      Includes bibliographical references.

      ISBN 978-1-58134-930-6 (tpb)

      1. Mate selection—Religious aspects—Christianity. 2. Marriage—Religious aspects—Christianity. 3. Family—Religious aspects—Christianity. 4. Parenting—Religious aspects—Christianity. I. Title.

BV835.B3485       2009

248.4—dc22                                      2008032937

ML                 18    17    16    15    14    13    12    11    10    09

14    13    12    11    10     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2     1

ToJasmine

CONTENTS

Introduction

1 Multigenerational Vision

2 The Ministry of Marriage

3 A Father’s Role

4 He Must Be a Follower of Christ

5 He Must Be Prepared to Lead

6 He Must Lead Like Christ (Ephesians 5)

7 He Must Be Committed to Children

8 He Must Practice the Four P’s

9 Don’t Send a Woman to Do a Man’s Job

10 Can’t Find One . . . Build One

Conclusion

Notes

INTRODUCTION

My desire in this book is to kill two birds with one stone. First, I want to lay out a clear, balanced, realistic, biblical picture of what moms and dads should be looking for on behalf of their daughters and seeking to produce in their sons. Unfortunately, most parents give little or no thought to what it takes to raise godly men. Moreover, we tend to be very vague when we encourage our daughters to find them. However, the Bible is far from silent on the issue. God has given us a clear picture of the role of the husband/father in the home, and by looking at that picture we can set a path for our sons to follow.

This book does not present a pie-in-the-sky portrait of the perfect man. My hope is to present the biblical principles that Paul puts forth so clearly in Ephesians 5 in an effort to give us some idea of the basic requirements that all men should seek to achieve.

In addition, I want to provide a road map for men who have a desire to lead their families biblically but simply do not know how. Since the release of Family Driven Faith (Crossway Books, 2007), I have been bombarded with calls, letters, and e-mails from families in general and from men in particular who are desperate for someone to tell them what to do next. “I get it. I see now that I am called to lead my family. Do you have any resources to teach me how to do that?” This is typical of the correspondence I’ve received. I knew that a groundswell of people out there was interested in family discipleship, but I was not quite prepared for the eagerness with which parents sought further instructions.

As we peel back the layers of what the Bible requires of husbands and fathers, several realities come crashing in on the male reader. I know this because they came crashing in on me as I researched and wrote. As you read, I pray that the Lord will guide you through the process of regret, repentance, revival, and reformation.

First, it is my prayer that these truths will cause men to regret the years the locusts have eaten. We have been lied to. We’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, and led astray. As a result, many of us have experienced lamentable losses in our personal lives and in our families. Some have failed marriages, estranged children, and other issues lingering over their heads as a result of having bought the lies that our culture has sold us concerning true manhood. Unless we come to regret these losses, we will never arrive at the next phase—repentance.

Beyond mere regret, it is my prayer that these truths will cause men to repent. Repentance is a change in attitude that leads to a change in behavior. It is a turning away. We turn from sin toward God. Once we have recognized the error of our ways, the biblical response is to repent. It is not enough to look at the damage that has occurred as a result of our failures as men and wallow in regret; we must repent. As the truths in the coming pages resound in our minds, it is my hope that the Holy Spirit would grant repentance.

Third, it is my prayer that these truths will cause men to experience revival. We need an awakening. We need to experience what Jonathan Edwards called “a genuine work of the Holy Spirit.”1 We do not need men to merely feel guilty about falling short of the biblical standard; we need to see a supernatural wave of genuine gospel revival. Our culture has been on the losing end of a spiritual battle for far too long. As a result, most men are numb to the constant pummeling to which we are constantly subjected. It is going to take more than just good intentions to turn the tide. We need a genuine movement of God.

Finally, it is my prayer that these truths will cause men to seek reformation. Revival changes the affections, but reformation changes our course. To reform something means to remove its ineffective or unjust qualities. Our current understanding of manhood is in many ways ineffective and unjust. It is ineffective in that the current state of the family is confusion and disorder. It is unjust in that it is in direct violation of the Word of God.

Of course, there is always the danger that these truths will cause men to retreat from their high calling. Two types of men stand at the base of Mount Everest. The first (and most common) type is the man who says, “That’s incredible . . . I could never make it to the top.” The second type is the man who says, “That’s incredible . . . I can’t wait to see the view from the top.” Some men will look at the biblical portrait of a multigenerational family leader and say that the bar is set much too high. Those men will continue to be satisfied with doing just a little bit better than our failing culture. Others, however, will see the heights to which they have been called and the fruit that the climb will bear in their lives and in the lives of those whom they are called to lead and will gladly take up the challenge.

1

MULTIGENERATIONAL VISION

“I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.”

EXODUS 20:5–6

WHO GIVES THIS WOMAN?

My hands were shaking as I stood at the altar staring into the eyes of all those people. I tried to relax, but the more I thought about it, the worse it got. My hands were sweating, my mouth was dry, and I had a thousand things running through my head. The music started, the crowd stood to their feet, and then, like something out of a movie script, the bride appeared. I thought I was going to pass out . . . and it wasn’t even my wedding.

Here I was, a young seminarian about to perform his first “real” wedding ceremony. It was all I could do to get through my lines and remember the bride’s and groom’s names. Since then I’ve thought a lot about weddings. To tell the truth, I’m not much of a fan. The whole thing has become so commercialized that the sacred covenant at the center of it all has been all but lost. However, a closer look at the wedding ceremony offers important insight.

For one thing, most people—whether they are Christians or not—want to get married in a church. They also usually want to have the ceremony performed by a minister. Why? I believe this is due to the fact that we all know deep down that God is the author of marriage. We understand that marriage is sacred.

However, what intrigues me most is a simple ritual that goes almost unnoticed in contemporary ceremonies—the consent of the father for the bride to marry. As I stood there that day, I asked the age-old question, “Who gives this woman to be married?” Even in the movies sentimental screenwriters often work the traditional response, “Her mother and I do” into the script. But where does this come from? What does it mean? Do we really believe that a woman needs the consent of her father in order to marry? Do we really believe a young man needs permission from the father of the bride? Or is this question (and the corresponding “may I have your daughter’s hand in marriage?” before the official engagement) merely a quaint, anachronistic touch that we can do without if we wish?

I believe it’s more than that. I believe these two steps are extremely important. I also believe that their true meaning and significance must be recovered. Young men have traditionally asked a woman’s father for her hand in marriage because we have always known that fathers are responsible for protecting their daughters. Unfortunately, this question is often reserved until after the couple has been seeing each other for years and, in many instances, have already begun to enjoy the privileges of marriage. At that point the question is reduced to an insulting, symbolic gesture.

As for the question at the altar, I believe that too has great significance. Fathers do indeed “give [their] daughters in marriage” (Jeremiah 29:6). This is a symbol of protection and care for the daughter being entrusted to her husband. It is also a symbol of trust. The father is saying to his daughter, “I have evaluated and appraised this man, and I trust him with the most precious thing in the world, my little girl.”

If this is true (and I believe it is), then fathers must do more than just send their daughters off into the world and “hope they come back with a good one.” We must take our responsibility seriously. We must walk with our daughters through this process of finding a suitable husband. We must also actively protect our daughters from men who do not measure up to God’s standard. If we don’t, the consequences may be dire.

Unfortunately, most of us have little or no experience or coaching in this area. We have been conditioned by our culture to take a backseat and just hope for the best. As a result, our daughters are left to fend for themselves, and the results are sometimes frightening. But what’s a father to do? Are we supposed to arrange marriages? Should we lock our daughters in the basement until they’re thirty? Besides, how appropriate would it be for me to stick my nose in her business?

These questions and a whole host of others have kept many fathers on the sidelines. But this simply is not good enough. There is too much at stake. For the sake of our children and our children’s children, we must reclaim this ground. We must begin to think outside the cultural box in order to protect our sons and daughters from the devastation all around us.

A MULTIGENERATIONAL OBJECT LESSON

Several years ago, my family had the privilege of building our first home. People warned us that the experience would be traumatic, but we went forward nonetheless. Several events surrounding that experience are burned indelibly on the forefront of my mind. One of the most poignant memories is the day I decided to plant some shade trees.

I had talked about planting shade trees in our backyard for weeks. I researched the different types of trees known to thrive in our part of the country. I looked into the type and amount of shade each would provide. I even estimated the amount of time it would take for each type of tree to reach maturity. In short, I did my homework. Finally, the day came and I went out and bought our trees. I bought a magnolia because it is one of my all-time favorites. I also bought a sweetgum, a red maple, and an oak tree. I had the trees delivered and planted them in strategic sections of our yard, paying particular attention to the course of the setting summer sun.

At last, after the last support stake was driven into the ground, my work was done. I stepped back, took in the glorious sight, and hurried off to collect Bridget and the kids. I had them all close their eyes as they walked through the back door. Then, after everyone was in perfect viewing position, I yelled, “Ta da!”

I wish I could say that everyone marveled at the grandeur of our new landscape. However, much to my dismay the children were actually quite disappointed. They looked at the trees, then back at me, then back at the trees, then back at me. Finally, after a few moments of silence, one of them said, “That’s it?” “What do you mean?” I replied. “I thought you were planting trees,” the let-down child added. “That’s what I did,” I said with a hint of frustration in my voice. Then it dawned on me. They were expecting full-grown, thick-limbed, ready-to-climb trees! They couldn’t understand why I was so excited about these glorified bushes. Fortunately, I recognized that was an incredible teaching moment.

I told the children that planting trees takes patience. We would have to wait for the trees to reach maturity. However, in five or ten years there would be more shade than they could imagine. At this point they looked at each other and shook their heads. “Dad, five or ten years is like forever,” my daughter said as she folded her arms in disappointment. Here was another teachable moment. I looked at my children and told them something that I have since said to them no less than a hundred times. “Kids, you must seek to become the kind of people who plant shade trees for others to sit under.” I went on to explain how people in the past had sacrificed in order for us to enjoy virtually everything we had. We talked about our Founding Fathers, about brave African slaves, about adventurers, and even about grandparents.

I’m not sure how much of that day’s lesson sank in with the children. However, since then I have been trying to teach the same lesson in myriad ways. We constantly talk about living our lives in such a way that we plant spiritual shade trees for the benefit of others. We use phrases like multigenerational vision and legacy. As our children get older and anticipate their future, they are beginning to understand that life is about more than the here and now. They are beginning to catch the vision.

One area where this vision is taking hold is in our family’s understanding of marriage, family, and manhood and womanhood. Think about it. If we think multigenerationally, that has to impact the way we view marriage and family. Where do these multiple generations come from if not through marriage and the family?

Thus I can no longer view my role in raising sons and daughters merely as an eighteen-year sentence to be endured. If I have a multigenerational vision for my family, then my role in fathering my children is a lifelong partnership in kingdom expansion. These truths force us to adjust our thinking in regard to what we are teaching our daughters to expect and our sons to become in regard to biblical manhood.

WHY, WHAT HE MUST BE

I am convinced that one of the most crucial questions I face is, whom should my daughter marry? Notice I did not say, will but should. Far too often we think about the marriages of our children like pagan mystics. We close our eyes real hard and just hope against hope that the stars will align and the right man will come along. I think this is a mistake. The issue of whom our daughters will marry is far too important to be approached in this unbiblical fashion.

I believe God has spoken rather decisively in his Word about what our daughters should look for. Moreover, I believe there are some non-negotiables that our daughters must be looking for. There are some things a man simply must be before he is qualified to assume the role of a Christian husband. For instance, he must be a Christian (2 Corinthians 6:14); he must be committed to biblical headship (Ephesians 5:23ff.); he must welcome children (Psalm 127:3–5); he must be a suitable priest (Joshua 24:15), prophet (Ephesians 6:4), protector (Nehemiah 4:13–14), and provider (1 Timothy 5:8; Titus 2:5). A man who does not possess—or at least show strong signs of—these and other basic characteristics does not meet the basic job description laid down for husbands in the Bible.

Moreover, as a father, it is my responsibility to teach my daughter what these requirements are, encourage her not to settle for less, and walk with her through the process of evaluating potential suitors. Of course, these ideas may come as a shock to many in contemporary Christian circles (not to mention society at large). However, I have found that there is a growing discontentment among young women today. They are tired of being thrown to the wolves. They are also tired of feeling like they have to settle for less than God’s best. My question is, why should they?

I am not talking about setting an unreasonable standard. In fact, if you think the aforementioned list is unreasonable, I recommend you look at it again. We’re not talking about requiring a man to be six feet tall or have a six-figure income, a college degree, or a two-car garage. We’re talking basic, biblical requirements. And if we desire to see God’s favor in generations to come, we had better be committed to upholding his standards when it comes to “giving [our] daughters in marriage” (Jeremiah 29:6).

I have often been asked when I started to think multigenerationally in regard to my family. The truth is, I have always thought in terms of multigenerational legacy. Unfortunately, I learned the hard way. I watched the negative multigenerational legacy of my family from my childhood. All around me families were falling apart. My parents, my grandparents, and eventually my cousins all bore evidence of the reality of multigenerational legacy. Of course, I didn’t recognize this right away. In fact, it would be many years before I would grasp the magnitude of my multigenerational family legacy.

THE INEVITABILITY OF MULTIGENERATIONAL LEGACY

It was Thursday, April 27, 2006, and my life was about to change. I walked into the house after running a few errands, and I could tell something was wrong. The house was eerily quiet. The kind of quiet we’re not used to with all the kids we have running around. I made my way through the living room into our bedroom where Bridget was ending a phone call rather abruptly. She tried to smile at me, but she couldn’t. The corners of her mouth quivered as she fought to keep them from turning downward. “Sit down, baby,” she said as she stroked my arm. She didn’t have to say another word, but she did. “Your dad is dead.” Those words reverberated in my ears. I can almost hear them today. I had waited for this day. Truth be told, I had at times hoped for this day. However, I wasn’t ready for it. I wasn’t ready to be fatherless . . . again.

Another Fatherless Child

As a boy I had grown accustomed to fatherlessness. My mother and father were high-school sweethearts who found themselves dealing with an unplanned pregnancy in the climate of the late 1960s. In those days there was no Roe v. Wade screaming at young men and women from every corridor of society that abortion is the answer. In those days Planned Parenthood—which now has more than 70 percent of its offices in minority neighborhoods in keeping with the eugenics of their founder, Margaret Sanger—wasn’t as ubiquitous as it is today. In those days the culture of death refrained from screaming at young black women and men, “Better to kill the baby than to allow him to be born black and poor.” In those days a young man knew he was expected to “do the right thing” and get married. So that’s exactly what my parents did.

Unfortunately, my parents’ marriage did not last long. I have seen pictures of the three of us together, but I have no memories of that brief stint. All I ever knew was fatherlessness. I was blessed to have occasional contact with my dad. I spent time with him on numerous occasions. However, I, like most of the kids I knew growing up, did not have the privilege of his presence in our home.

Moreover, my relatives with whom I had contact were in the same boat. Both my parents were married twice. My paternal grandparents lived next door to each other, had three children, and were not married. Bridget didn’t fare any better. Her parents divorced twice, and at the time of this writing her father is on his sixth marriage. Out of our four parents, one is currently married (for the sixth time), all four have been divorced, and three have had children out of wedlock.

Things don’t get any better with our siblings. We have seven siblings between us. Because of the ravages of sin, immorality, and divorce, nearly half of our siblings are half siblings. Nevertheless, the legacy has continued. Four of our seven siblings are currently married. Five of seven (all who have married) have been divorced. Four of the seven have had children out of wedlock.

The legacy also extends to my first cousins. Few of my first cousins—on both my mother’s side of the family and on my father’s side—had fathers in the home. The lone exceptions were the five children of one of my mother’s six siblings whom I barely knew. Thus, only five of my twenty-three first cousins grew up with a father in the home. That’s just shy of 22 percent. Ironically, their father died before they were all grown.

As to the marks of the family legacy, they are definitely present among my first cousins. Only eight of the twenty-three (35 percent) ever married. Five of the eight (63 percent) who married have been divorced. However, that number is a bit deceiving since one is deceased, one was widowed, and another is currently separated. Thus, only one of my twenty-three first cousins is currently married and living with her spouse. That represents less than one half of 1 percent!

Unfortunately, the trend is being passed on to yet another generation, as is evident in the parenting practices of the current generation. At least fourteen of my twenty-three first cousins (61 percent) have parented children out of wedlock. More specifically, twenty-eight of the thirty-eight children born to my first cousins (73 percent) were born out of wedlock.1

Though this may sound shocking to some, I never gave it a second thought. In fact, as I think back over my childhood, I can hardly remember one close friend who had a father in his home. I remember Terence and Howard who lived across the street. Their father did not live with them. Martin, who lived on my block, lived with his mother as well. Try as I might, I cannot think of one kid with whom I played in the neighborhood who had a mother and a father in the home.

In some ways this eased my burden. Had I grown up in a neighborhood full of boys whose dad lived with them and had family members with intact families, I would probably have felt the weight of my father’s absence (and my family legacy) more acutely than I did. Nevertheless, I knew something was missing. I remember watching television shows like I Love Lucy and wishing I had parents who fought like Ricky and Lucy did. At least little Ricky had immediate access to both of them.

As I grew up, the yearning subsided. This was due in part to other father figures such as coaches and teachers who began to stand in the gap. However, it was largely due to my father’s constant struggle to overcome a drug habit. His life was filled with the highs and lows of drug use, rehab, sobriety, and relapse. I rode the roller coaster with him for a while, but when I started a family of my own, that became an untenable proposition. I would hear from my father when he was on the mountaintop; then he would disappear for months, and we knew he had “fallen off the wagon” again.

I wish I could say I stayed strong through it all. However, I did not. There were days when I prayed he would die. I remember praying, “Lord, it would be easier knowing he was dead than wondering how he’s destroying his life today.” Then there were other days when I tried to seek him out and help him. It all seemed quite hopeless until four months prior to his death.

In January 2006 I got a call from my father and had a conversation with a different man. He wasn’t just clean and sober—he was changed! We began to talk more regularly, and for the first time we really talked. We discussed spiritual matters, politics, current events, history, family, and a host of other things. It got to the point where my wife, Bridget, would walk into my office and know right away if it was my father on the phone. There was just something special in the connection we had established.

Unfortunately, those were our final days together. One day my father was in the middle of a conversation when the man with whom he was speaking was called away. When he came back he found my father slumped over dead. That was it. It was as though the Lord had brought my father back to his right mind just long enough to set a few things straight. However, the life that he had led ultimately took its toll.

One of the first people I called was my brother, Gebel. Gebel was a senior in high school at the time. We barely knew each other. However, in many ways I knew Gebel well. I knew the struggles that he had to endure in my father’s absence during his formative years. I also knew the struggles that lay ahead as he embarked on the rest of his life without even the possibility of his father’s presence. I knew Gebel because I knew the cost of fatherlessness. I knew Gebel because I had tasted the reality of multigenerational legacy.

The Cost of Fatherlessness

Anyone who doubts the reality of multigenerational legacy need only look at statistics related to fatherlessness. Nearly 75 percent of fatherless American children will experience poverty before the age of eleven, compared to 20 percent of those raised by two parents.2 In fact, fatherlessness is the number one cause of poverty in America. Although it happens on occasion, very few children are living in poverty with a father in the home. However, poverty is not the only legacy of fatherlessness.

Children living in homes where fathers are absent are far more likely to be expelled from school.3 They are also more likely to drop out of school, develop emotional or behavioral problems, commit suicide, and fall victim to child abuse or neglect.4 Fatherless males are far more likely to become violent criminals (fatherless males represent 70 percent of the prison population serving long-term sentences).5

We have all heard these startling statistics associated with fatherlessness. Nevertheless, the trend toward fatherlessness continues. It is as though we do not care about the high price we all pay for fatherlessness. These facts should compel us to take a hard look at what we are doing to raise and train godly men and what we are willing to do to see to it that our daughters find godly men and refuse to settle for anything less.

As a pastor, I have had the unfortunate experience of trying to communicate this harsh reality to men considering divorce. It breaks my heart to realize that so many men out there are infected with the poison of self-centeredness. However, try as I might it is often impossible to get through to a man who is committed to the view that “God wouldn’t want me in an unhappy marriage” or “It’s better for the kids to have divorced parents than for them to have parents who are in conflict.”

Anyone who has been around for a while knows that these statements represent the norm. What’s worse, many of these men have heard these comments fall from the lips of pastors or “Christian counselors.” I am not suggesting that all divorced men are calloused. Nor do I believe that divorce is always a man’s “fault.” A discussion about the theology of divorce and remarriage is beyond the scope of this book. However, I do believe that the way we think about the consequences of weak, ungodly, or absent fatherhood is unbiblical and unhealthy.

The result of this is a generation of young men and women who view marriage as a temporary arrangement as opposed to a lifelong covenant. As a father, I must protect my daughter from men who think this way. I must also see to it that I do not allow such thinking in my sons. A young man who is worthy of a wife will have a clear understanding of the covenantal nature of marriage. He will also have a healthy apprehension when he thinks about the magnitude of his responsibility should he assume the role of a husband and father. He must know the weight he is taking on his shoulders and be willing to accept it. He must be a man who is willing to endure hardship for the sake of his family should he be called upon to do so.

What is it going to take for us to hear the alarm? Or as researchers Carol and Don Browning ask, what is it going to take for us to sound the alarm? They write, “We have asked dozens of people from . . . churches, ‘Have you ever heard in your church a discussion about the crisis of fatherhood?’ and have yet to hear one member say yes.”6 This is astonishing! Admittedly, this is anecdotal evidence. However, one cannot help but be alarmed by the experience of these researchers.

THE OTHER SIDE OF MULTIGENERATIONAL LEGACY

Jonathan Edwards is perhaps the most influential American theologian of all times. Born in 1703, his books are still a mainstay in Christian colleges and seminaries. More importantly, his collected works are featured prominently in many pastors’ libraries. However, far too few people know the other side of Edwards’s story. Edwards was not only a remarkable preacher, professor, pastor, and prolific author. He was also a loving family man. He was devoted to his wife, Sarah, for thirty-one years until his death in 1758. He led in regular family worship and oversaw the education of his eleven children. Moreover, his was a multigenerational legacy seldom seen before or since.

In 1900, A. E. Winship studied what happened to 1,400 descendants of Jonathan and Sarah by the year 1900. He found they included 13 college presidents, 65 professors, 100 lawyers and a dean of a law school, 30 judges, 66 physicians and a dean of a medical school, and 80 holders of public office, including three US Senators, mayors of three large cities, governors of three states, a Vice-President of the United States, and a controller of the United States Treasury. They had written over 135 books and edited eighteen journals and periodicals. Many had entered the ministry. Over 100 were missionaries and others were on mission boards.7

Interestingly, many overlook the fact that Edwards was the leader of the Great Awakening. In other words, he lived during a time of great decline! As Charles Finney often said, “Revival presupposes declension.” The Puritans had come to this land and established an amazing foundation. However, the passion of their descendants began to wane. The fire had begun to die. Jonathan Edwards was not the product of a great revival; he was one of its catalysts.

As real as the aforementioned facts and statistics about my family legacy may be, they are far from the final word. Multigenerational legacy is real but not quite insurmountable. We can change course. We must change course! We must recognize the price we have paid and say, enough! We, like Jonathan Edwards, must fan the flames of revival even when the embers appear to be dead. God can use us in the midst of a cold, dead heritage to bring about the winds of revival.