Agatha Christie E-Book

Mark Campbell

• Herausgeber: No Exit Press
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015

Beschreibung

Marking the 125th anniversary of Agatha Christie's birth, this new edition offers an informed introductin to the chief proponent of the English village murder mystery. Although she created two enormously popular characters - the Belgian detective Hercule Poirot, and the inquisitive elderly spinster and amateur sleuth Miss Jane Marple of St Mary Mead - it is not generally acknowledged that Agatha Christie wrote in many different genres: comic mysteries (Why Didn't They Ask Evans?), atmospheric whodunits (Murder On The Orient Express), espionage thrillers (N or M?), romances (under the pseudonym of Mary Westmacott), plays (The Mousetrap) and poetry. This guide examines all of Christie's novels and short stories and lists the various TV and film adaptations of her works.

Leseprobe

Agatha Christie

Since her debut in 1920 withThe Mysterious Affair at Styles, Agatha Christie has become the chief proponent of the English village murder mystery. Although she created two enormously popular characters – the Belgian detective Hercule Poirot, and the inquisitive elderly spinster and amateur sleuth Miss Jane Marple of St Mary Mead – it is not generally acknowledged that she wrote in many different genres: light-hearted mysteries (Why Didn’t They Ask Evans?), atmospheric whodunits (Murder On The Orient Express), espionage thrillers (N or M?), romances under the pseudonym of Mary Westmacott, plays (such as the enormously successfulThe Mousetrap) and even poetry and children’s stories. She was never afraid to break the rules either, and provoked a storm of controversy with the unorthodox resolution ofThe Murder of Roger Ackroyd, now acclaimed as one of the classics of British crime fiction. Christie wrote complex whodunits in a clear, readable style, which is why her books are as popular now as they were almost a century ago. Exemplary film and TV adaptations starring Peter Ustinov and David Suchet as Poirot, and Margaret Rutherford and Joan Hickson as Miss Marple, have also encouraged new readers to search out her work.

As well as an informed introduction to the Christie phenomenon, this book examines all her novels and short stories. The film, TV and stage adaptations are listed, and the appendices point you to books and websites where you can find out more.

Mark Campbell

Mark Campbell has written for The Independent, Midweek, Crime Time and The Dark Side, and is one of the main contributors to the two-volume British Crime Writing: An Encyclopedia. He has written Pocket Essentials onSherlock Holmes,AgathaChristieandCarry on Films.  He lives in Kent and was the last theatre critic for The Kentish Times when they published reviews. He directs and appears in plays when he’s not busy reading his collection ofWhizzer and Chipscomics.

Praise forAgatha Christie

Mark Campbell on Agatha Christie’s Dartmoor’

–Independent on Saturday

‘everything you ever wanted to know about

Christie’s stories in incredible detail’

–Glasgow Evening Times

‘I am getting more impressed by the Pocket Essentials

with each one I see...’

–Diverse Books

‘one of the most useful books I’ve come across in

the vast array of titles available to Christie fans...’

–Mostly Harmless

For Mum and Gran

Contents

Acknowledgements

Foreword by Simon Brett

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

Chapter 7

Chapter 8

Chapter 9

Chapter 10

Chapter 11

Chapter 12

Chapter 13

Chapter 14

Chapter 15

Chapter 16

Chapter 17

Chapter 18

Chapter 19

Chapter 20

Chapter 21

Chapter 22

Copyright

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to the following people who have helped me get this book finished: to the person I can’t name for help above and beyond the call of duty, to Andy Slater for donating his PC to a very worthy cause (me), to Mary for proofreading, emotional support and generally keeping the children out of my hair, to the Slade Library staff for their usual friendliness and to the staff of the BFI, the NFT, the British Museum and Madame Tussaud’s – to each and every one, I extend a heartfelt thank you. My thanks also to David Wilkins, Julia Beaver, Nancy Lee Child and John Curran for supplying further information.

Foreword by Simon Brett

Some contemporary crime writers are a bit sniffy about Agatha Christie, but I’ve always been a great admirer. As an author, she achieved what she set out to do, and was more massively successful than she could ever have anticipated.

To complain that she didn’t write slice-of-life realist novels seems to me as misguided as to criticise Shakespeare for not writing any operas. That was not what he was trying to do. Agatha Christie had a comparable knowledge of her skills and limitations. She aimed to write literate, entertaining crime novels that would puzzle and confuse – but never cheat – her readers. And that’s what she achieved – magnificently.

She also helped to define the crime novel. Though nobody now writes the same sort of books except as pastiche, Agatha Christie still casts a long shadow over the genre. Taking her cue from that other great shadow-caster, Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes, she developed the amateur detective into the dandified, infuriating but brilliant Hercule Poirot. She also created the archetypal observant little-old-lady sleuth in Miss Marple, and she set them both in a world where the only rôle of the official police force was to be permanently baffled. Agatha Christie’s characters have spawned many descendants in crime fiction over the years.

Her other huge skill lay in her plotting. Until examining her books, it is hard to imagine that so many legitimate ways exist for an author to fool readers. One of the reasons why nobody now writes the sort of puzzle novel that Agatha Christie made her own is that she thought of and developed all the best puzzles. There aren’t any left.

And now lovers of Agatha Christie’s work – or those unaware of its breadth and scope – can have all the important details to hand in this neatly-packaged little volume by Mark Campbell. I’ll certainly always have a copy handy.

Simon Brett

August 2001

Simon Brett worked as a light entertainment producer in radio and television before taking up writing full time in 1979. Since then he has written over sixty books, more than half of them crime novels, including Situation Tragedy (1981), Mrs, Presumed Dead (1988) and Death on the Downs (2001); his 1984 novel A Shock to the System was made into a film starring Michael Caine. He is also the author of the radio and television series After Henry and the bestselling book How to be a Little Sod. A former Chairman of the Crime Writers’ Association and the Society of Authors, Brett is President of the Detection Club and lives in an Agatha Christie-style village on the South Downs.

1

The Puppet-Master

It was the covers that did it for me. I would peruse the crime shelves of our local Bournemouth bookshops – a scrawny ten-year-old with unruly blonde hair and National Health glasses – and drink deeply of those violent, nightmarish images: telephones dripping with blood, skulls grinning out of golf balls, eyeballs poking from blood-spattered tennis racquets… it’s a wonder I wasn’t scarred for life. (Actually, that’s a moot point.) And each time I’d slide a book from the shelf, the name ‘Agatha Christie’ in big, bold letters would stare back at me (like that dratted eyeball). Yes, she – and Dick Francis, ugh, his covers were terrifying too – would guarantee a brief spine-chilling thrill in the bustling first floor of WH Smith, when I was probably supposed to be looking for Enid Blyton.

Then a few years later I read one. It was Murder on the Orient Express. Well, all I can say is I’ve never seen such a flagrant flaunting of the Trade Descriptions Act. Where was the dripping blood? The gouged eyeballs? The grinning skull on a mound of worm-infested earth? They were nowhere to be seen. All I got was a posh train, a load of upper-class people speaking in old-fashioned language, and a very confusing story about one person after another being accused of killing someone (in a very bloodless way, I was disappointed to find). The covers may have promised blood and guts (those ‘70s cover artists – what were they on?), but the contents couldn’t be more different – they were as gentle and dated as a pat on the shoulder from your great-aunt.

So I didn’t read many more after that. (After a brief love affair with the Pan Books of Horror Stories, I turned to James Herbert and the odd Stephen King. Gouged eyeballs aplenty there.) But of course the thing I’d missed – the thing that those covers claimed in spades – was that these light, genteel murder mysteries were far more gripping precisely because they were so bloodless. Death stalked in broad daylight down some country lane, a person everyone hated would end up murdered in a conspicuous location, all the villagers would be suspected… it wasn’t the blood that was scary, it was the paranoia. And you can’t paint paranoia on a book cover.

As a child, the idea of paranoia was too abstract to get my head round – it’s an adult fear really and, thankfully, most of the time it has no basis in reality (except, of course, for us writers). But it happens all the time with Agatha Christie. Pick up one of her books and you will have absolutely no idea whodunit – it could be anyone. And I mean anyone. And there’s nothing cosy about that, is there? We need reassurance, we need to tell the goodies from the baddies. It’s a strange and rather terrifying notion when we can’t, and Christie delights in denying us this privilege. She will choose who’s guilty, she will deceive with her bluff and double-bluff, she will show you just who’s in charge. And you, the reader, stumble blindly in her shadow.

Paranoia goes hand-in-hand with claustrophobia, and thus Christie’s best stories are ones that make a feature of small settings and small casts. Her globetrotting thrillers automatically disappoint by moving around so much – we need to feel isolated, trapped; be it in a hotel on a desolate island or the book-lined study of a smart country house snowed up for the winter. Christie is an absolute genius at using similar ingredients over and over, and yet each time providing new thrills, new twists, new rushes of anticipation and horror. Even the worst of her books has its own unique frisson of excitement. She just can’t help it – even in her eighties, she still came up with the goods.

Her critics say she wrote glorified crossword puzzles – meticulously plotted narratives that turned her characters into zombiefied ciphers who had to be in place ‘A’ by point ‘B’ in order to overhear person ‘C’. Well, yes, there is an element of that. But within these contrivances, there is a huge amount of ‘give’. Her characters exhibit real personalities, their motivations are for the most part believable, and the interplay between them is always a joy. For Christie’s observance of the nuances of conversation is second to none. She captures the curious half-sentences and ungrammatical constructions that we call ‘talking’ and slaps them straight down onto the page. It’s like we’re hearing real conversation, and of course that’s where she wrong-foots us – within these throwaway lines are clues that she has planted, not the characters. Remember, she is the puppet-master, even when her creations seem to have a life of their own.

People mainly read Agatha Christie for one reason – a book written by her is a guarantee of a good story, reasonably well told, with a hard-to-guess ending. There’s nothing too deep in her books (although she is, accidentally, a social historian of some note), but what there is is set down with such a casual air of authority that you feel obliged to pay attention. Her lowbrow reputation masks her highbrow techniques – she is one of this country’s finest novelists (crime or otherwise) – if you haven’t done so already, go out and buy, borrow or steal The Murder of Roger Ackroyd and you’ll see I’m right.

Those 1970s covers might have been scary, but the stuff inside is a whole lot scarier.

2

Dame Agatha Christie Biography

“If anybody writes about my life in the future, I’d rather they got the facts right.”

Agatha Christie, quoted in The Sunday Times, 27 February 1966.

Agatha Mary Clarissa Miller was born at her parents’ home of Ashfield in Barton Road, Tor Mohun, a district of Torquay, on 15 September 1890. She was the last of Frederick and Clarissa Miller’s three children: Margaret (‘Madge’) Frary was born in 1879, and Louis (‘Monty’) Montant arrived a year later. Educated at home, she taught herself to read and write at an early age – her first published piece was a poem about electric trams printed in an Ealing newspaper when she was 11, the same year that her father died of pneumonia. In 1910, after Christie’s return from a Parisian finishing school, she and her mother spent the winter months in Egypt, an experience that would stay with her for the rest of her life.

Back in England she had some of her poetry published in The Poetry Review and won some prizes. But her attempts at stories were less successful: writing under the pen names of ‘Mac Miller’ and ‘Nathaniel Miller’ they were rejected. Her mother suggested that local author Eden Philpotts might be permitted to give her some advice. He proved very encouraging, complimenting her on her grasp of structure and dialogue and recommending that she continue writing.

She became engaged in 1912 to Major Reggie Lucy, but while he was serving in Hong Kong she fell in love with Lt Archibald Christie of the Royal Field Artillery. They married 18 months later on Christmas Eve 1914, with Archie now a Captain in the Royal Flying Corps. He went to war two days later, and Christie began working as a nurse in Torbay Hospital, later moving to the dispensary where she acquired her knowledge of poisons. Remembering her sister’s claim years before that she couldn’t write a detective story, she decided to prove her wrong and began working on one during quiet periods at the dispensary. Poison would be central to the plot of The Mysterious Affair at Styles, her first published novel (and the Pharmaceutical Journal would later write approvingly of her knowledge).