"And there was light". OM= m*c2= E E-Book

Frank Ludwig

• Herausgeber: Books on Demand
• Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 31

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017

Beschreibung

This book with its formula Om = m*c2 = E may serve as a binding bracket for spirituality/religion and science. With quotes of Jesus of Nazareth, it was proven the thesis that Om = m*c2= E, using Hindu and Buddhist teachings as well to close the circle with modern science. The reconciliation of energy and matter, of spirit and body is healing both body and soul as well as religion and science. The gap between science and religion, that existed nearly for 400 years since the scientific revolution can be closed now. The age old OM explained with the only 100 years old formula from Einstein leads to a beneficial connection from religion and science. It heals the division of body (matter) and spirit (energy) too.

Leseprobe

„I have come to light a fire in this world. I wished nothing more than that it would be burning already.“

Jesus of Nazareth

(Eternal flame, sign of the eternal source God-IT-self, source: shutterstock)

„To share is more holy than to divide.“

Frank Ludwig

(Apple orchard: “What was hidden will become obvious.” (Jesus), source: shutterstock)

„Science without religion is poor, religion without science is blind.“

Albert Einstein

Dedicated to the Divine Source of all Being, God, and to my woman.

“And there was light…”

Content:

Introduction

Einstein’s Formula E=m*c

2

The Origin of God and the world

The Essence of God

The Face of God

The Origin of man

Implications

The Universal Source as the sun of suns

The divine Trinity and the source

A new symbol of the Universal Source God ITself

Résumé

Sources & Literature

1. Introduction

Have you ever asked yourself, how God would look like? For sure, you have! But the version with the old bearded man is probably out of date. As an optimist, I assume that the perception of God of humans can evolve. (See Chris Griscom, “The Evolution of God”).

Attention, there are three things you should not mix: First is the “being of God”; the second is your perception of the “being God”. Third is the model you built to represent your perception of the relationship between you and God. They need not necessarily be the same.

Let us go for a little mind-adventure and let’s look how the answer to the perhaps oldest question “How does God look like” could be answered today.

If you look at the images of God in the world (see the images man “made” of God -> they are manmade!), there is one still quite dominant: “The punishing God”. This archetype from the old part of the Bible still dominates western civilisation.

Often, the idea of God are more diffuse and a mixture. You get taught what God is like at an age when you still could remember but the concepts thought by parents, teachers and priests are replacing your own knowledge.

Characteristically for the image of God as a punishing God is the overshadowing of the singularity, the source of all being that is pure love, pure intelligence and pure joy by images of “the gods” that came to earth to reign mankind. In Buddhism, these beings, the gods are long living sentient beings with supernatural forces that made them superior to man. Be it Jawhe, Enki, Zeus, Indra, Amun or Odin, the are all these “gods with supernatural forces” but the are not God, they are not the source of all being.

They just used a trick and occupied the place of God the source and stood in front of God, shining in IT’s light. Then they said, “We are God” and reigned humankind.

It might have been a true identification in some cases; mostly it was just a trick to occupy power when they said, “I am God”. Jesus said too “I am”, but he never said “God”. That is the difference.

The gods might have impressed humans by their supernatural forces, but the were mostly driven by the ego. That is the difference between the gods and Jesus. Jesus was god too, he performed miracles to show that, but he was not driven by the ego.

I would like to look at the images of God that are characteristically for the three important religions better known to me, Christianity, Buddhism and Hinduism: