Cryptids - Mysterious Unknown Creatures
Nicholas Dylan© Copyright 2023 Nicholas Dylan
ContentsMokele-MbembeBigfootSpring-Heeled JackDe Loy's ApeFaversham WolfLake Champlain MonsterLoch Ness MonsterShapeshifting LizardsEnfield HorrorThe Jersey DevilShessieZuiyo Sea MonsterAliensKentish ApemanMngwaBeast of BodminOrang-PendickYetiChupacabraThe Fouke MonsterOgoPogoGoblinWildman of EuropeBlack ShuckAhoolSurrey PumaBlob of Batteries CloseAlmasKent CavemanMorgawrSkunk ApeAkkorokamuCaddyBeast of BladenboroDevonshire DevilKiwi VampireRed Eyed Dog ManNandi BearThetis Lake MonsterAgogweMiscellaneous CryptidsFurther ReadingMOKELE-MBEMBEMokele-Mbembe
is an amphibious dinosaur said to reside in the Congo. This name comes
from the Lingala language and means ‘one who stops the flow of rivers’.
This creature is sort of like the African version of the Loch Ness
Monster and has become one of the most famous cryptids. You might think
the idea of a 35 foot dinosaur living in the Congo undiscovered is
preposterous but then new species of plant, insect, and monkeys have
been discovered in that region in fairly recent times so it isn't as if
the world's wildlife and nature has been completely charted and
classified. Admittedly though it is something of a stretch to think
that a dinosaur might exist but then the creature would have plenty of
places to hide in an area that large and remote."Some people
believe that some dinosaurs linger on," wrote the Live Science website.
"Hiding until the present time in the remote jungles of central Africa,
especially in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The region is the
reputed home of the mokele-mbembe, an amphibious dinosaur-like creature
said to be up to 35 feet long, with brownish-gray skin and a long,
flexible neck. According to legends, it lives in caves it digs in
riverbanks and feeds on elephants, hippos, and crocodiles."The
creature is a 20th century cryptid and has been spoken of for just over
one hundred years now. Despite mokele-mbembe being a part of local
legend and no shortage of eyewitness descriptions or sightings any
tangible proof of the monster's existence has proved to be elusive so
far. Several expeditions have been launched in the area but they've -
for the most part - departed without any concrete evidence for a
dinosaur roaming around central Africa. Footprints alleged to have been
left by the monster have proved inconclusive. In 1992 a
Japanese film crew shot some aerial footage of what they believe could
be the mokele-mbembe swimming in the sea but - as with Loch Ness - the
footage was far from certain and could have been anything from a small
animal swimming to a piece of wood or a large fish. Some though would
point to the fact that the object seemed to have a dinosaur type neck.
The problem with the footage is that - like all cryptid and indeed UFO
footage - it is taken from a long distance away and subject to camera
shaking and a certain blurriness. You could be forgiven for wondering
why no one ever seems to get any crystal sharp unshaken footage of a
cryptid or UFO!There have been several alleged sightings of
mokele-mbembe in fairly recent years. The creature is said to live in
caves that it digs for itself. Some believe the origin of this cryptid
derives from the 1909 book titled Beasts and Men by Carl
Hagenbeck. Hagenback said in the book that dinosaurs could still exist
in Africa and this claim seemed to activate imaginations and lead to
various monster hunters going off in search of dinosaurs. There was
actually a Kickstarter funded expedition to search for mokele-mbembe in
fairly recent times but this expedition came up empty handed and found
life in the Congo Basin rather difficult.There have been around
50 expeditions mounted to find evidence of the mokele-mbembe but none
of them have been successful. The main problem for the alleged
existence of this monster is that if it is some sort of undiscovered
dinosaur then it can't be alone and there must be more of them. If this
was the case though why hasn't a body or a convincing sighting of one
captured by film or camera emerged? As such this legend, as fascinating
as it is, must be taken with a pinch of salt. There are many
possible theories surrounding the demise of dinosaurs - like a
meteorite, an epidemic or a pathogenic fungi. Dinosaurs were not merely
overgrown reptiles but far more complex. Some must have been
surprisingly cunning and intelligent in order to survive and hunt and
so it was clearly an epic disaster the did for them.An
interesting question to consider is this - what would the world be like
today if the dinosaurs hadn't become extinct? Well, velociraptors were
intelligent enough to hunt in packs and even had their own form of
language. Imagine dinosaurs with many years more evolution than us. It
is highly probable they would have developed intelligence like humans
and be living in an advanced dinosaur society with their own
technology. Who wouldn't pay money to get a glimpse of what that would
have looked like? BIGFOOTDo
huge and elusive ape creatures that walk upright like humans lurk
around in the dark and lonely forests of the American Pacific
Northwest? Bigfoot is a fun and creepy mystery and it does have perhaps
the most famous piece of 'monster' film of all time in the Bluff Creek
footage Roger Patterson took in 1967 of what he claimed was a female
Bigfoot walking across a shallow stream and rocks towards the woods.
Although most people probably take Patterson's footage with a grain of
salt it has never been 100% debunked and some experts have pointed out
the very strange gait of the creature and presence of what appear to be
moving breasts and muscles. If it was a hoax then it was a clever one. Some
claim that the 'Bigfoot' was Patterson's colleague Bob Gimlin in a suit
and note that Patterson was a well known opportunist who had previously
written a book about The Abominable Snowman. It is on the face of it a
remarkable coincidence that he just happened to ride out into the
forest to look for Bigfoot and managed to film one fairly swiftly -
although not for very long with a somewhat shaky camera. It appears
that more than one person has claimed to have been the man in the suit
in the Patterson footage but the suit itself has never turned up and
special effects people of the time were impressed with the footage.
Anthropological artist and photogrammetrist Bill Munns estimated the
height of the 'Bigfoot' in Patterson's film to be 7'4 (!) and no one
has ever got close to replicating the eerie footage with a man in a
monkey suit, even though many have tried.But what of the
practical chances of these creatures actually existing? The mountain
forests where they are said to reside are surprisingly unexplored and
very dank, dark places where hunters and people rarely venture into the
darkest corners. Is it possible they could hide there on a frugal
vegetarian diet? The main problem with the Bigfoot legend is that these
furry rascals are rather elusive and no body or skeleton is ever found
- something which you'd imagine would have happened by now if they
really existed. In these huge dank forests, it is easy for someone's
imagination to run away with them and see shadows or glimpses of
animals. Strange noises that echo through the trees, especially at
night, are also prone to have people putting two and two together and
coming up with five.Places like the Klamath National Forest and
the Six Rivers National Forest can be very spooky. There is the obvious
fact too that some of the more strange characters who live out in these
places on their own have long since worked out that a few Bigfoot tales
will have a chance of getting them a bit of cash and attention. The
roots of Bigfoot come from the late nineteenth century, from the idea
that some naturalists had about a 'missing link' roaming the earth
somewhere undetected. Sightings have been steady since the 1920s and
despite skepticism from the scientific community (who believe folklore,
hoaxes and misidentified animals are responsible for the Bigfoot
legend) this enduringly compelling mystery shows no sign of losing its
appeal just yet.SPRING-HEELED JACKSpring-Heeled
Jack is an alleged supernatural criminal first sighted in 1837 in
London. In the volume Encounters with Flying Humanoids, Ken Gerhard
describes Spring-Heeled Jack in the following way - "So named because
of his apparent ability to bound effortlessly through the air,
Spring-Heeled Jack was greatly feared by residents of suburban London
during the 1830s. A diabolical, super-villain of sorts, he was usually
described as being tall, thin, and cloaked in a tight-fitting oilskin
suit, as well as a flowing cape. Jack first gained notoriety when he
began to accost solitary, young women by ripping at their clothing with
steely claws while he breathed noxious, blue flames into their faces.
To this day, no one is sure of Jack’s true identity, nor from where
this notorious scoundrel came.'The legend of this bizarre
menace began in October 1837 when a young woman named Mary Stevens was
walking home from Lavender Hill (where she was employed as a servant).
The girl said she was assaulted in an alley by a monstrous figure who
ripped at her clothes with claw like hands and had the cold clammy
fingers of an animated corpse. Mary claimed that words could hardly do
justice to the terrifying nature of this flesh crawling assailant. He
was like some ghostly monster with the face of a zombie and bright red
eyes that seemed to come from the fiery pits of Hell itself. Mary
managed to scream for help during the attack and this brought members
of the public onto the scene - whereupon the mysterious and alarming
fiend fled into the night in impossible fashion. The beast was not only
lightning quick but also elusive. One minute he was there and in the
next second he was gone in a flash. Who did Mary encounter
that night? She was deemed to be a credible enough witness when she
spoke of her spine chilling encounter with god knows what. Mary wasn't
a drunk or someone who was prone to making up stories. She really did
seem to have had a strange and bewildering encounter with someone very
frightening indeed. And so began the mystery and legend of the uncanny
rascal destined to be forever known as Spring-Heeled Jack. The alarming
encounter with Mary Stevens was merely the tip of the iceberg for this
dreaded fiend. Jack was soon creating mass panic in various parts of
England. You might say that, for a time, Spring-Heeled Jack became
ubiquitous. He was all over the place. The next day
Spring-Heeled Jack was sighted again by a coachman who claimed that
Jack leapt in front of his carriage in death-defying fashion and then
made his escape over a wall (a wall that no mere mortal would have been
able to scale) with a spine-chilling cackle of laughter before
vanishing into the night. Jack, as you've probably worked out by
now, got his name because of his reputed ability to leap up into
the air - almost as if he was flying. This famous rascal
therefore had what what you might describe as supernatural qualities
attributed to him. It would obviously be rather difficult to catch a
criminal who had the ability to leap over houses so you might say that
Jack was rather elusive - to put it mildly! The legend of Spring-Heeled
Jack now had firm roots and began to flourish. In the England of the
late 1830s, Spring-Heeled Jack was like Blighty's version of Bigfoot.
The actual existence of the fiend seemed unlikely but all the same
plenty of people claimed to have seen it. Illustrations of
Jack tend to have him as a scrawny and sinister figure with winged
arms. He is usually depicted as looking like a cross between the child
catcher in Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and the monster in the horror film
Jeepers Creepers. He is usually depicted as having an impish Devil like
appearance with a pointed Jimmy Hill chin and red eyes. Jack looks
rather like Emperor Ming from Flash Gordon (albeit a less suave version
of Ming) in some of the illustrations I perused in the writing of this
chapter. Sometimes he is depicted with artificial wings like Batman and
sometimes the wings appear to be real wings. The one constant in
illustrations of Spring-Heeled Jack seems to be an evil smirk. He
obviously got a big kick out of frightening the living daylights out of
the general public. Separating fact from fiction in this
legend is not easy though. Was there any truth to this legend at all or
is Jack is simply an urban myth or piece of entertaining English
folklore? We should remember that people at the time were very prone to
believing in the supernatural. Many people still believed in witches
and even vampires. Tales of a winged monster who could leap over
tremendously high walls were obviously taken at face value by more
people in 1837 than they would be today. If you described an encounter
with Spring Heeled-Jack today you'd probably be asked why you hadn't
filmed him on your phone! It was obviously a lot easier in 1837 to come
up with a fantastic story without having to provide too much in the way
of evidence. The two most famous accounts of Spring-Heeled
Jack are the Jane Alsop and Lucy Scales cases. In the Alsop case, a
young woman named Jane Alsop claimed that she answered the door to a
police officer (presumably, the police officer wanted some assistance
from Jane's father - that seems to be the general perception) who
claimed to have captured the fiend. Jane went out to see for herself if
the police officer really had captured Jack (you could say that Jane
was rather brave in doing this but maybe curiosity just got the better
of her - who wouldn't want a look at Spring-Heeled Jack if given the
chance?) - whereupon Jack then threw off his cloak and vomited blue
flame as his eyes sparkled a hellish red glow. Jack then fled the scene
in his usual magical gymnastic fashion - though not before Jane had
seen his hideous appearance for herself. Cases like this,
whether true or not, were enough to get Spring-Heeled Jack in the
newspapers by now. Very soon servant girls all over London were
swapping lurid stories about this alleged fiend who seemed to enjoy
scaring people - especially young women. A man named Thomas Millbank
was initially arrested for the attack on Alsop but then set free when
it was established he was incapable of breathing blue fire! You
honestly couldn't have made that up! Millbank had actually
turned himself in to the police claiming to be Spring-Heeled Jack but
he was obviously just some crazy person looking for attention. The fact
that Millbank looked fairly normal (no red eyes at all and a normal
chin) and patently lacked the ability to leap over houses also rather
torpedoed his fanciful claims of being the dreaded and notorious
Spring-Heeled Jack! Millbank was set free by the police and after this
five minutes of fame and notoriety slid back into the obscurity from
whence he came.